Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

Trump

Trump Says China Convinced the World 'Let's All Do Magnets'
Product Reviews

Trump Says China Convinced the World ‘Let’s All Do Magnets’

by admin August 25, 2025


Donald Trump was all over the place during two press conferences at the White House on Monday, where he rambled about his fascist vision for the country. But there were some points of levity, including when the president tried to explain how China became a leader in rare earth minerals. Or at least that’s what we think he was talking about.

“China intelligently went in and they sort of took a monopoly of the world’s magnets,” Trump said. “Nobody needed magnets until they convinced everybody 20 years ago, ‘let’s all do magnets.’”

Trump went on to say that there “were many other ways that the world could have gone” and insisted “we’re heavily into the world of magnets now.” Trump went on to say that he sent Boeing “all the parts so that their planes could fly,” referring to parts that were held up during the trade war.

Trump: “China intelligently went in and they sort of took a monopoly of the world’s magnets. Nobody needed magnets until they convinced everybody 20 years ago, ‘let’s all do magnets.’ There were many other ways that the world could have gone … we’re heavily into the world of magnets now.”

[image or embed]

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) August 25, 2025 at 10:16 AM

Trump went on to say that tariffs are “much more powerful” than magnets and that China would be charged a “200% tariff or something” if leaders in the country “don’t give us magnets.” Trump insisted that eventually the U.S. would have “so many [magnets] we won’t know what to do with them.”

Trump made the remarks during his meeting with South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, but what is he talking about? It seems the president is trying to refer to the tit-for-tat that’s been happening ever since his so-called “Liberation Day” tariffs were announced on April 2. China retaliated on April 4 by announcing new export controls on seven rare earth elements and magnets that are vital for things like electric vehicle motors, wind turbines, and electronics.

U.S. automaker Ford has faced production delays over its inability to source rare earth magnets, according to the Wall Street Journal, even temporarily shutting down a facility in Chicago over the shortage back in May. China controls roughly 90% of the world’s rare earth metals, making Trump’s unnecessary trade war a truly idiotic fight to pick if you’re trying to boost manufacturing in the U.S.

What does Trump mean by saying that China convinced the world “let’s all do magnets”? That’s unclear, but it might be a reference to the fact that China has been a leader in developing sustainable energy production. Trump and the Republican Party more broadly have been committed to fossil fuel energy for purely ideological reasons, and it probably makes sense to the president’s base for him to insist China somehow hoodwinked the world into accepting the energy transition to sell magnets. Or something. As with all things Trump, it’s often hard to read his mind.

At one point during the press conference that preceded his meeting with the South Korean leader, Trump referred to a governor named “Kristi Whitman,” someone who doesn’t exist. Trump later corrected himself to say “Whitmer,” apparently referring to the governor of Michigan, but her name is Gretchen, not Kristi. The Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, was nearby, which may explain why the name Kristi was rattling around in that hollow noggin of his.

Trump also signed an executive order on Monday that would jail anyone who burned an American flag for one year. That issue was most famously litigated in the 1980s, resulting in the 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case Texas v. Johnson, which holds that burning a flag is protected speech.

But Trump obviously doesn’t care. He’s going to keep testing the boundaries of what’s accepted by the American public, recently escalating his military occupation of Washington, D.C., by having members of the National Guard carrying weapons. Federal agents are terrorizing the city, and people are getting arrested for little more than just filming police, according to videos that are being posted to social media.

Trump has threatened to send the National Guard to Chicago next, something the governor of Illinois has explicitly said he doesn’t want. But it’s a brand new world. And things are going to get a lot worse before they get better.





Source link

August 25, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
U.S. Government Now 'Controls' 10% of Intel, Trump Says
Product Reviews

U.S. Government Now ‘Controls’ 10% of Intel, Trump Says

by admin August 23, 2025


President Donald Trump announced Friday that the U.S. government would be taking a 10% stake in Intel, the struggling U.S.-based chip manufacturer. But the president’s choice of words will definitely raise more than a few eyebrows, especially since the Trump regime has previously said the federal government will have no corporate governance role at the tech company.

“It is my Great Honor to report that the United States of America now fully owns and controls 10% of INTEL, a Great American Company that has an even more incredible future,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

The government taking a 10% ownership stake in Intel shouldn’t be surprising, as rumors about the deal leaked last week. But what might surprise people is Trump’s use of the word “control.” Nobody seems to know what that means yet.

“I negotiated this Deal with Lip-Bu Tan, the Highly Respected Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The United States paid nothing for these Shares, and the Shares are now valued at approximately $11 Billion Dollars,” Trump continued.

“This is a great Deal for America and, also, a great Deal for INTEL. Building leading edge Semiconductors and Chips, which is what INTEL does, is fundamental to the future of our Nation,” according to Trump. The president ended his post with the now-customary, “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!” and “Thank you for your attention to this matter.”

Lutnick’s denials on Tuesday

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was asked about the plans for a government stake in Intel during an interview with CNBC on Tuesday. Lutnick was specifically quizzed whether the government would get a governance role at Intel, something the Commerce Secretary insisted would not happen.

“Do you get governance here?” CNBC host David Faber asked.

“No, no, no, no, no…” Lutnick said over and over to the question, suggesting the entire idea was absurd. “Come on, stop that stuff. It’s not governance, right, we’re just what was a grant under Biden into equity for the Trump administration, for the American people.”

Faber pointed out that any other entity owning 10% would expect to have a say in how that company was run. “Why wouldn’t you want some…” Faber started to say before Lutnick drowned him out by repeatedly saying “non-voting, non-voting.”

Faber noted that the U.S. government got a so-called “golden share” when Japan-based Nippon Steel tried to buy U.S. Steel, meaning that Trump can potentially veto corporate decisions he doesn’t like. It’s unclear at this point what kind of influence Trump can have at Intel with this new 10% stake, which likely involves converting $10.86 billion in grants for Intel from the Biden-era CHIPS ACT into equity, according to reporting Tuesday the New York Times.

Who actually negotiated the deal?

Lutnick was the first to break the news on social media in a tweet shortly before Trump, though the Commerce Secretary’s announcement obviously carries less weight in an increasingly authoritarian country like the U.S. It’s not real until Dear Leader says it’s real.

“BIG NEWS: The United States of America now owns 10% of Intel, one of our great American technology companies. This historic agreement strengthens U.S. leadership in semiconductors, which will both grow our economy and help secure America’s technological edge,” Lutnick wrote.

BIG NEWS: The United States of America now owns 10% of Intel, one of our great American technology companies.

This historic agreement strengthens U.S. leadership in semiconductors, which will both grow our economy and help secure America’s technological edge.

Thanks to Intel… pic.twitter.com/AYMuX14Rgi

— Howard Lutnick (@howardlutnick) August 22, 2025

Lutnick’s tweet was sent at 4:10 p.m. ET and included a photo of him with Intel CEO Lip Bu-Tan. That presumably irked Trump, who sent his own post on Truth Social almost an hour later, at 5:04 p.m. ET, and included the claim “I negotiated this Deal with Lip-Bu Tan” in the second sentence.

Trump reportedly met with Tan last week after the president called for the Intel CEO’s resignation over alleged links to China. Trump insisted there was “no other solution to this problem” but changed his tune after the meeting.

What do the Dems say?

Folks on the left have been divided on whether Trump’s plan for Intel is a good one for America. Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont who caucuses with the Democrats, said earlier this week that he supports the plan for the U.S. government to take an equity stake.

“If microchip companies make a profit from the generous grants they receive from the federal government, the taxpayers of America have a right to a reasonable return on that investment,” Sanders told Reuters.

But Sen. Mark Warner, a Democrat from Virginia, wouldn’t commit so emphatically one way or another. In an email to Gizmodo, Warner said taking an equity stake “may or may not be the right approach,” while emphasizing that cutting-edge chips should not “flow to China without restraint” if that undercuts investments made in the U.S.

“We need a strategy that protects American innovation, strengthens our workforce, and keeps the technologies of the future firmly in American hands,” Warner said. “Additionally, given the administration’s recent approach to other high-profile technology transactions, Congress must apply thorough scrutiny for potential conflicts of interest or undue interference in private-sector decisions unrelated to national security.”

Intel is a drop in the ocean

Warner is absolutely right that Congress needs to look into any conflicts of interest or “undue interference” on private companies. But given the current trajectory of the U.S.—where we’ve got armed troops on the streets of D.C. and harassment campaigns against the president’s opponents—it seems unlikely that Congress will be deploying any checks or balances soon.





Source link

August 23, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
At This Point, It’s Impossible to Know What the Trump Phone Looks Like
Product Reviews

At This Point, It’s Impossible to Know What the Trump Phone Looks Like

by admin August 22, 2025


It’s been over two months since Trump Mobile announced the T1 Phone was being “Made in the USA” designed “with American values in mind,” and it seems that anyone deciding to preorder it still can’t be sure exactly what phone they might receive.

In posts on X and Instagram on Wednesday, the Trump Mobile account encouraged followers to place their preorder, promising them that “the wait is almost over.” This was joined by an image that looks nothing like the one of the T1 phone that’s currently on the Trump Mobile website. It instead looks rather suspiciously like the rear side of a Samsung Galaxy S25.

Not just that, it actually appears to be the back of a third-party S25 phone case from Spigen that has been Photoshopped gold and stamped with the T1 logo and trademark American flag. Still visible, just behind the flag, is the Spigen company logo.

Spigen’s social media account commented under the post on X with an apt “??? bro what,” before writing on its own page that it had a “lawsuit incoming.” WIRED has reached out to Spigen for comment.

This isn’t the first time that questions as to what the T1 Phone will actually turn out to be have been raised. Not long after it was announced in June, the specs of the phone changed on the Trump Mobile website, along with deleting claims that it would be made in the USA.

Currently, the Trump Mobile website claims the T1 Phone will have a 6.2-inch punch-hole AMOLED screen with 120 Hz refresh rate, 50 MP main camera with a 16 MP selfie camera, and a 5,000 mAh battery. There’s also 256 GB of internal storage, an in-screen fingerprint sensor and “AI face unlock.”

It’s priced at $499, which includes a $100 deposit that apparently covers shipping and handling as well as your first month of Trump Mobile service. This suggests buyers will be required to use Trump Mobile with their T1 Phone, with no clear details before you authorize payment of any ongoing commitment to the service.

Users can, at least, wait to receive the phone before activating the service, and can request a full refund “at any time prior to the shipment of the phone.”

As to what the phone will look like when (and if) that ever happens though, it’s currently impossible to know—and Trump Mobile seems as unsure as the rest of us. All of which isn’t helping to curb suspicions that, right now, the T1 Phone—initially pegged to arrive in August—probably doesn’t exist in any shape or form.





Source link

August 22, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
DAAPrivacyRightIcon
Product Reviews

Trump Mobile is promoting its smartphone with terribly edited photos of other brands’ products

by admin August 22, 2025


Since it was announced in June, Trump Mobile has committed to an increasingly-surreal smoke-and-mirrors approach to its promised T1 smartphone. Despite the initial claims that the phone would be made in the United States, it seemed highly unlikely from the start that it was accurate. The “Made in USA” claims were quietly removed from the Trump Mobile website at a later date. AppleInsider spotted the latest bizarre wrinkle to this story, which is that the actual phone still does not exist.

The publication noticed that promotional images for T1 all show different smartphones that appear to be tweaked in a photo editor to look gold. While the website shows a badly edited image of what appears to be a Revvl 7 Pro 5G phone, an Instagram ad seems to depict an iPhone 16 Pro Max, again with the company’s branding overlaid. A third confusing image edit was posted on X earlier this week:

That photo shows a Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra equipped with a case made by Spigen. The South Korean accessory company’s logo can be seen behind the render of an American flag. Spigen’s response sums our reaction up pretty succinctly: “??? bro what.”



Source link

August 22, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Trump Is Betting Big on Intel. Will the Chips Fall His Way?
Product Reviews

Trump Is Betting Big on Intel. Will the Chips Fall His Way?

by admin August 21, 2025


The US government is aiming to take an equity stake in Intel in exchange for grants the company was already committed to receive under the Biden era CHIPS Act, according to comments US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick made in an interview with CNBC. The move is part of the government’s efforts to boost US chip manufacturing.

“We should get an equity stake for our money, so we’ll deliver the money which was already committed under the Biden administration,” Lutnick said. “We’ll get equity in return for it.” Previously, the government was discussing taking a 10 percent stake in Intel, according to the New York Times.

The deal could help the venerable chipmaker fund its US-based semiconductor fabrication plants, or fabs, which have required billions of dollars to construct and maintain, even as demand for Intel chips has waned in recent years. Some chip industry experts and members of the Trump administration say that keeping Intel afloat is essential to US national security, because it lessens the country’s reliance on chipmakers overseas.

But analysts and one notable economist say a potential tie-up between Intel and the US government could present a conflict of interest and may not result in the kind of domestic chipmaking industry the administration is angling for.

“It’s not the right policy to have the US government own things, to have privatization in reverse,” says Stephen Moore, a visiting fellow at The Heritage Foundation and a former senior economic adviser to Trump’s 2016 campaign. “That’s similar to Europe’s industrial model, and we haven’t done that often here in the US, because a lot of it ends up failing.”

Government Intervention

The US government has some history of investing in the private sector. Moore cites a 1980s program called the Synthetic Fuels Corporation, a federally directed multibillion-dollar investment in companies producing liquid fuels from coal, oil shale, and tar sands. It was hailed by President Jimmy Carter as “the cornerstone of our energy policy” and had fallen apart by 1986.

Then, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the US government stepped in with multibillion-dollar bailouts to stop US automakers and some banks from going under. Those funds were issued either through the Troubled Asset Relief Program, in which the US Treasury Department bought up or guaranteed toxic assets, or in the form of bridge loans. Many were eventually repaid.

More recently, the Department of Defense agreed to fund a US-based rare-earth magnet company, MP Materials, via equity and loans, in order to expand production and decrease the country’s reliance on China. The deal would in theory give MP Materials the capital to increase its manufacturing capacity from 3,000 to 10,000 metric tons.

Moore says the ideal scenario is that these arrangements between the government and private industry have an end point. “It should be an agreement to own a short-term stake and then divest,” he says.

But the current Trump administration has been taking some of these public-private business dealings a step further: In June, the administration approved a partnership between Japanese steel company Nippon Steel and Pittsburgh-based US Steel, dependent on a national security agreement and a so-called golden share provision. The government insisted that it have a say in US Steel’s company decisions, including board appointees and future relocation plans. (This deal was also designed to help the US compete with China on steel production.)



Source link

August 21, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
There’s ‘No Question In The World’ Bitcoin Will Be Worth $1M: Eric Trump
GameFi Guides

There’s ‘No Question In The World’ Bitcoin Will Be Worth $1M: Eric Trump

by admin August 21, 2025



JACKSON HOLE, Wyo. — U.S. President Donald Trump’s son, Eric Trump, is convinced bitcoin

will eventually be worth over $1 million.

Trump, who co-founded bitcoin mining company American Bitcoin earlier this year, reiterated his excitement for bitcoin during an appearance at the SALT conference in Jackson Hole on Wednesday.

He even called himself a “bitcoin maxi.”

The businessman and executive vice president of the Trump organization said he now spends over 50% of his time on crypto projects.

He said he believes that the crypto asset will be worth $175,000 a token by the end of the year, sticking with his earlier prediction.

Trump told several personal stories pointing out what he described as the flaws of the current financial system and how bitcoin and blockchain technology can solve those issues, including faster transactions and payment settlements.

American Bitcoin, which merged with Eric and his brother Donald Trump Jr-owned American Data Center in March, is expected to go public on Nasdaq via a merger with Gryphon Digital Mining (GRYP).

The brothers own 20% of the company while bitcoin miner Hut 8 holds the remaining 80%.

Trump’s comments came hours after Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong made a similar prediction.

Join the crypto policy conversation Sept. 10 in D.C. — Register now for CoinDesk: Policy & Regulation.



Source link

August 21, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Decrypt logo
Crypto Trends

Bitcoin Miner Bitdeer Aims to Expand US Rig Manufacturing Amid Trump Tariff Headwinds

by admin August 20, 2025



In brief

  • Nasdaq-listed Bitdeer posted earnings this week—with slimming profits but increased revenue.
  • The miner is laser-focused on its expansion.
  • But it won’t be pivoting to a treasury strategy yet.

Bitcoin mining has faced challenging times as costs rise, rewards fall and the macroeconomic environment grows more uncertain, but Nasdaq-listed Bitdeer (BTDR) told Decrypt that it will focus on expansion in the months ahead.

The firm plans to build rigs and invest in U.S. resources, Bitdeer CFA Jeff LaBerge told Decrypt, even as its profits have slimmed. LaBerge said that U.S. President Donald Trump’s favorable cryptocurrency policies may help the firm even as his trade policies hurt its ability to acquire mining equipment.   

“It’s created more things to think about,” LaBerge said of President Trump’s approach, but added that “the policies have been supportive of crypto and energy” on the whole. 

“On the tariffs side, we’re confident that we’ll come to a Bitcoin-friendly resolution that will allow companies like ours to grow,” he said. 

LaBerge’s comments followed the release of the Singapore-based company’s second quarter earnings reflecting at least some of the same impact faced by miners throughout the industry, even as Bitcoin’s price has jumped. 



Bitdeer increased revenue to $155.6 million, beating analysts’ estimates by more than 90% and higher than the $70.1 million for its 2024 first quarter. But it posted a net loss of $147.7 million compared to a net profit of $409.5 million for its first quarter. 

Bitdeer’s (BTDR) stock closed down by 0.3% on Wednesday to trade at $12.87. BTDR shares are off more than 43% year-to-date.  

Bitdeer’s now hoping manufacturing mining rigs—due to start this year for U.S. customers—will help the firm, along with its self-mining business. Many of its competitors are similarly planning to shift production to the U.S. 

In a statement, Matt Kong, chief business officer at Bitdeer, said he expected the firm’s financial results would “improve sequentially.” 

Bitcoin was recently trading at $114,581, up 1.2% over the past 24 hours, but well off its most recently high of $124,128, set earlier this month. 

Miners, which are typically large industrial operations of specialized computers processing transactions and minting new coins for the cryptocurrency’s network, have faced increasing headwinds over the past year. Bitcoin network difficulty now stands at a record high of 129 trillion. That’s a 6.4% increase over the past 90 days, according to mining data provider CoinWarz.

Meanwhile, transaction fees have slipped below 1% of block rewards for the first time ever. The revenue earned by miners comes from the static block reward, which is currently 3.125 BTC per block mined, and transaction fees paid by users. Before last year’s halving the payoff for miners stood at 6.25 Bitcoin. 

Amid these trends, a number of miners have moved resources to capture surging interest in artificial intelligence technology or refocused entirely to become cryptocurrency treasuries. BitMine Immersion now holds about $6.6 billion in Ethereum, while Bit Digital’s treasury totals more than $520 million. 

Bitdeer said that it did not have plans to reposition itself, even as its own Bitcoin holdings have grown. 

“We’re more practical than idealistic about holding Bitcoin on our balance sheet—it’s not part of our identity, we’re not looking to be seen as a Bitcoin treasury necessarily,” LaBerge said.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

August 20, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Trump Family Expands Crypto Bets as Thumzup Pivots Into Dogecoin Mining
NFT Gaming

Trump Family Expands Crypto Bets as Thumzup Pivots Into Dogecoin Mining

by admin August 20, 2025



Thumzup Media Corp. (TZUP), which counts Donald Trump Jr. as a large shareholder, said it will acquire Dogehash Technologies, Inc. in an all-stock deal, pivoting from digital marketing into industrial-scale crypto mining

Under the agreement, Dogehash shareholders will receive 30.7 million Thumzup shares, according to a Tuesday release, valuing the transaction at $153.8 million, based on the shares’ closing price. The combined company will rebrand as Dogehash Technologies Holdings, Inc. and list on Nasdaq under the ticker XDOG, pending shareholder approval later this year.

Dogehash operates about 2,500 Scrypt ASIC miners across renewable-powered data centers in North America, with plans to scale up further in 2026. Unlike firms that pad their balance sheets by simply buying coins, Dogehash has invested in its own infrastructure, giving it direct exposure to dogecoin

and litecoin block rewards at a lower cost base.

The deal comes on the heels of Thumzup’s $50 million stock offering in July, earmarked for mining expansion and digital asset accumulation. The company says it will also use Dogecoin’s DogeOS layer 2 to stake in DeFi products, aiming to boost miner returns beyond standard rewards.

This new deal adds to the Trump family’s expanding crypto empire. Eric Trump and Donald Jr. launched American Bitcoin earlier this year with Hut 8, which has over 60,000 miners.

Meanwhile, World Liberty Financial, another Trump-backed venture, struck a $1.5 billion deal with Nasdaq-listed ALT5 Sigma to inject its WLFI token into the firm’s treasury.

Thumzup stock fell 41% to $5.01 on Tuesday.



Source link

August 20, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Intel
Gaming Gear

Trump eyes up Intel: What the White House’s reported 10% stake could mean for the struggling manufacturer

by admin August 19, 2025



In a surprising turn of events on Monday, it was reported that the U.S. government was considering buying a 10% stake in Intel using CHIPS and Science Act in a bid to provide the struggling chipmaker much-needed cash. Coincidentally, SoftBank agreed to acquire Intel stock worth $2 billion, offering Intel another boost. But can an approximately $12.9 billion injection in liquid cash help Intel turn its fortunes?

Grants to equity

The Trump Administration is reportedly studying whether to convert up to $10.9 billion in promised grants under the CHIPS and Science Act into equity. iGiven the current stock price, it would give the U.S. government a 10% stake in the company.

That amount would equal about $10.5 billion at Intel’s current market capitalization of around $103 billion, which is below the value of the company’s real estate and fabrication facilities. However, this decision has yet to officially happen, but there are strong signs pointing toward it.


You may like

Under the CHIPS and Science Act, Intel was awarded a package of $7.86 billion in grants and access to up to $11 billion in loans. The latest figure from the Bloomberg report suggests that a potential purchase of equity in Intel would exceed the previously agreed grant, from $7.86 billion, to a reported $10.9 billion, which is $3.3 billion more than previously agreed upon.

The subsidies were structured as reimbursements tied to the buildout of new fabs and construction milestones, so the funds were to be released in tranches over several years. Intel had already received $2.2 billion of those funds in late January 2025, according to Techcrunch.

The new thing about the Trump administration’s plan is not more money, but a different form of support. Instead of gradually paying the grants, Washington would convert part (or all) of Intel’s $10.9 billion package into equity and Intel in a lump sum, becoming the largest shareholder in the company, with a 10% stake.

As a result, Intel would not get any additional funds from the U.S. government. Intel would receive the funds sooner, and in a lump sum, while the U.S. government would move from a grantor to a shareholder.

The strategic importance of Intel

(Image credit: Intel)

Intel is a strategically important company for the United States both in terms of economic and national security.

Processors made using leading-edge process technologies are crucially important for American companies, such as Apple, AMD, Dell, HP, Nvidia, Qualcomm, and dozens of others. Without advanced silicon, these companies will quickly lose competitive positions to Asian rivals, which might result in trillions in losses to the U.S. economy.

Intel directly employs tens of thousands in high-skilled engineering and factory jobs, though the company enacted significant layoffs in June 2025.

There’s a ripple effect across suppliers, construction, and local economies, with the large number of people Intel employs. Additionally, large projects — such as the Ohio campus, known as the Silicon Heartland — are drivers of national and local economies, and are political symbols of American industrial strength and job creation.

The advantages of having a homegrown manufacturer

Advanced military and intelligence systems increasingly depend on advanced processors, many of which are now produced by TSMC in Taiwan or Samsung in South Korea. However, a domestic supplier ensures that chips intended for defense and aerospace programs are securely sourced and not exposed to supply chain disruptions or espionage risks.

Also, having a strong U.S. chipmaker improves America’s position in negotiations with allies (Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and the E.U.) that are also investing in semiconductors, and adversaries like China.

Intel is the only U.S.-based company with ambitions to make chips using leading-edge process technologies on American soil. While both TSMC and Samsung Foundry intend to build chips for U.S. companies in Arizona and Texas using advanced production nodes, they will not be their latest nodes.

In that sense, it is crucial for the U.S. government not only to keep Intel alive but also to ensure that it prospers. Losing Intel as a major player in the semiconductor industry would erode the U.S.’s foothold in one of the most important industries for the 21st-century economy, and make the country vulnerable to supply chain interruptions or foreign espionage initiatives.

Is $12.9 billion enough to save Intel?

Intel’s fab projects in Arizona and Ohio are part of the U.S. push to re-shore advanced manufacturing, so the country is not entirely dependent on foreign foundries. While Intel is about to begin high-volume manufacturing (HVM) at its Fab 52 and Fab 62 facilities in Arizona, HVM in Ohio has been pushed away from late 2025, to before 2030. But the importance of the Silicon Heartland in Ohio is hard to overestimate.

(Image credit: Intel)

Intel’s Silicon Heartland project in Ohio — the company’s first greenfield manufacturing site in decades — has heavily relied on government funding under the CHIPS Act, is instrumental to Intel’s foundry ambitions.

The planned Ohio site will span about 1,000 acres (4 km²), with room for as many as eight chip fabs along with facilities for suppliers and partner firms. Intel projected that a complete build-out could cost roughly $100 billion, while the initial phase was budgeted at about $28 billion for two fabs and support facilities.

If Intel had four new fabs capable of producing chips on its latest process technologies, 20A and 18A, by late 2025 or early 2026, it would have capacity for its own products and foundry customers.

However, as the semiconductor market shrank in 2022 – 2023 and Intel failed to get commitments from big customers, it delayed multiple projects and scaled down its capital expenditures in 2023 – 2024.

As a result, while the Arizona fabs are enough to serve Intel’s own needs and some foundry customers, it is unknown whether Intel can accommodate a large foundry client, such as Apple, Nvidia, or Qualcomm.

Intel needs to prepare for clients

(Image credit: Intel)

If Intel plans to land a major foundry customer, it needs additional production capacity that is specifically tailored for contract chipmaking (i.e., a high-mix/low-volume fab). Since Intel is preparing to build in Ohio, the best way for the company to build additional capacity likely is to construct at least one fab in Ohio to produce chips using its 18A-P or 14A process technologies. It’s also possible that Intel could build an additional fab at its Arizona site, which has all support facilities in place and a supply chain around it.

But, no matter where the new fab is — which will have both current-generation Low-Numerical Aperture (NA) and next-generation High-NA lithography tools installed — it will cost between $20 billion and $30 billion. This would be a lot of money for Intel, which bleeds billions every quarter. To add to the issue, Intel needs to begin construction as soon as possible to have the available capacity for prospective foundry partners in the years ahead.

According to Intel’s latest financial reports, the company has $21.04 billion in cash and cash equivalents. So, an influx of $12 billion could be instrumental in stabilizing the company and accelerating the Ohio site buildout, or starting a new fab phase in Arizona. However, a lot depends on timing.

Since support facilities and supply chains already exist in Arizona, it could be cheaper and faster to add a new fab module in Arizona, rather than accelerating the greenfield site in Ohio.

The political and financial importance of Intel

The combined infusion of $10.9 billion from the U.S. government and $2 billion from SoftBank carries weight well beyond the balance sheet, serving as both a financial lifeline and a symbolic endorsement of Intel, following a rocky patch.

For the U.S. government, converting CHIPS Act support into equity transforms subsidies into direct political ownership, which signals to both the industry and allies that America is serious about rebuilding advanced chipmaking capabilities, particularly through the high-profile Ohio project. Also, SoftBank’s $2 billion bet highlights Masayoshi Son’s belief in Intel’s design and production potential and its relevance amid the ongoing AI revolution.

Together, these moves represent a dual vote of confidence — one stemming from national strategy, the other from commercial opportunity and the strategic importance of Intel. This could reassure markets and strengthen Intel’s credibility at a moment when doubts over its competitiveness are quite high.

However, Intel needs to invest money in capacity for its future major foundry customers sooner, rather than later.

Follow Tom’s Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.



Source link

August 19, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Decrypt logo
GameFi Guides

SEC Punts on Trump Media Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF Decision, Plus XRP and Dogecoin Funds

by admin August 19, 2025



In brief

  • The SEC will decide on the Truth Social Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF on October 8, likely after a rules change request from two exchanges that could shorten approval processes.
  • The agency delayed decisions on XRP funds from Grayscale, Bitwise, CoinShares, Canary Capital, and 21Shares.
  • It also pushed back deadlines on separate Dogecoin and Litecoin ETFs, and a proposal to add staking to an existing spot Ethereum ETF.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has delayed its decisions on an exchange-traded fund proposed by Donald Trump’s media and technology company to track the performance of Bitcoin and Ethereum and seven other ETFs based on single digital assets.

In a filing Monday, the regulator said that it moved its deadline back 45 days for weighing in on the Truth Social Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF to October 8.

It announced identical delays for applications filed for spot XRP funds by Grayscale, CoinShares, Canary Capital, Bitwise and 21Shares, a spot Dogecoin ETF from Grayscale, and a spot Litecoin product from CoinShares, although the dates for potential approvals of those funds vary.

It also held up resolving a request to add staking to the the 21Shares Core Ethereum ETF, which tracks the price of the second-largest cryptocurrency by market value.



The delays comes four days after the agency delayed decisions on Solana ETFs from Bitwise, 21Shares, and VanEck, and a Dogecoin fund from 21Shares.

The SEC is weighing a wave of proposals tracking cryptocurrencies. Those submissions have resulted from the dramatic success of 11 spot Bitcoin and nine Ethereum ETFs, a more favorable political environment for cryptocurrencies ushered in by the Trump administration, and growing interest by traditional finance giants who were formerly resistant to the asset.

The filings also follow roughly three weeks after two major U.S. exchanges asked the SEC to approve amendments that could significantly shorten the approval process for future crypto exchange-traded funds, automatically listing certain products without requiring case-by-case filings.

In separate filings, Cboe BZX and NYSE Arca requested changes to their listing standards that would allow certain crypto ETFs to be listed without enduring the SEC’s rigorous evaluation under Rule 19b-4, a process that requires exchanges to submit proposed rule changes. Under current guidelines, such reviews of proposed changes to funds could take 240 days.

Bloomberg Senior ETF Analyst Eric Balchunas told Decrypt that the SEC’s filings Monday were “nothing significant,” and were likely timed to follow a probable SEC green light of Cboe and NYSE’s amendments next month following the conclusion of a comments period.

“Even though it feels like ‘Isn’t this SEC supposed to approve all this stuff?’, the listing standards are out for comment,” Balchunas said. “So just in the nick of time, these listing standards should be approved. And then we’re anticipating a batch of approvals based on the listing standard starting in October.”

“So this delay feels discouraging, but it’s just a little more patience,” he added. “It’ll all happen soon.”

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

August 19, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 12

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (1,022)
  • Esports (766)
  • Game Reviews (699)
  • Game Updates (898)
  • GameFi Guides (1,013)
  • Gaming Gear (967)
  • NFT Gaming (997)
  • Product Reviews (957)
  • Uncategorized (1)

Recent Posts

  • Romeo Is A Dead Man Has So Many Art Styles Because Suda51 Wanted Artists To “Do Their Best”
  • Perplexity Comet Flaw Exposed User Data to Attackers, Brave Reports
  • Cardano’s Token Finds Support as Charles Hoskinson Talks Markets, Network’s Future
  • Inside the Chinese PC gaming industry as it gets ready to dominate the next decade: ‘We have to work harder, we have to make the games even better’
  • Someone Recreated All Of Robocop As The Cracker Barrel Logo

Recent Posts

  • Romeo Is A Dead Man Has So Many Art Styles Because Suda51 Wanted Artists To “Do Their Best”

    August 25, 2025
  • Perplexity Comet Flaw Exposed User Data to Attackers, Brave Reports

    August 25, 2025
  • Cardano’s Token Finds Support as Charles Hoskinson Talks Markets, Network’s Future

    August 25, 2025
  • Inside the Chinese PC gaming industry as it gets ready to dominate the next decade: ‘We have to work harder, we have to make the games even better’

    August 25, 2025
  • Someone Recreated All Of Robocop As The Cracker Barrel Logo

    August 25, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • Romeo Is A Dead Man Has So Many Art Styles Because Suda51 Wanted Artists To “Do Their Best”

    August 25, 2025
  • Perplexity Comet Flaw Exposed User Data to Attackers, Brave Reports

    August 25, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close