Tag:

Survive

First Bitcoiner in Space Says BTC Will Survive Quantum Computing
GameFi Guides

First Bitcoiner in Space Says BTC Will Survive Quantum Computing

by admin


  • Focusing on interplanetarization
  • Historic space mission

F2Pool co-founder Chun Wang, who is known as the first Bitcoiner to travel to space, is convinced that the fears of quantum computing breaking Bitcoin are overblown.

“It turns out those who are panicking about quantum computers may wipe out Bitcoin have never written a single line of quantum code,” Wang quipped.

Focusing on interplanetarization

As reported by U.Today, recent advancements within the quantum computing space have led to persistent concerns about the viability of Bitcoin’s SHA-256 hashing algorithm.

Google’s Willow, Microsoft’s Majorana 1 and IBM’s Blue Jay projects show that the newfangled technology is moving forward despite remaining somewhat obscure and lacking virtually any real-world use cases that could show off its actual potential.

You Might Also Like

Recently, Tesla CEO Elon Musk specifically asked Grok, an AI chatbot developed by xAI, to estimate the probability of SHA-256 being cracked.

However, Wang is convinced that quantum computers still will not have cracked Bitcoin by the time humans actually settle on Mars. “Instead of wasting time worrying about quantum computing, it makes far more sense to think about how to make Bitcoin latency-tolerant, so it can serve an interplanetary civilization,” he said.

Wang has specifically stressed that he wants Bitcoin to assume the role of the interplanetary settlement currency instead of some “fleeting” altcoins.

Historic space mission

As reported by U.Today, Wang traveled to space as part of the Fram2 mission, flying over the Earth’s pole alongside three other crew members.

During the mission, the crew conducted a total of 22 scientific experiments, which included performing X-rays in space for the first time.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Which Will Survive the Next 50 Years?
Crypto Trends

Which Will Survive the Next 50 Years?

by admin



Key takeaways

  • Stocks may survive AI disruption if they adapt quickly to changing technological and economic demands.

  • New businesses spurred by AI, such as robotics, biotech or space, are expected to drive growth, and the stocks mirroring such advances will have a better chance of surviving the innovation turmoil.

  • Periods of disruption should be expected as AI reshapes labor and markets; therefore, the next few years are for adaptation to the new technology.

  • Bitcoin’s future rests on proving itself as a true store of value but also transitioning into a medium of exchange. AI can facilitate this, mainly by impacting scalability and transaction processes.

  • As a decentralized system, Bitcoin is not affected by internal politics, whose human element could disrupt its operations. It only has to stay up-to-date with the new tech to remain relevant.

Nobody has the means to predict what will happen within the next 50 years, especially not in a financial market that is influenced by so many external factors.

However, analyzing the current status of AI and its impact on fintech sectors such as Bitcoin and stocks, it’s possible to understand what would be the best investment choice between these financial tools.

The purpose of this article is to help you make more informed decisions and understand if Bitcoin or stocks is a better choice for you in the future.

Stocks or Bitcoin: Which will survive the AI revolution?

AI will accelerate innovation and efficiency in several industries, sectors and aspects of our lives, surely advancing improvements in tech like Bitcoin in terms of efficiency and, hopefully, scaling. But how about stocks? Is their investment concept a thing of the past? Let’s find out a little bit more.

What is the case for stocks?

The world’s first stock market took shape in Amsterdam in 1602 with the founding of the Dutch East India Company. What began as a marketplace for trading company shares soon became a model for raising capital and investing. By the late 17th century, London had developed its own trading hubs, while New York’s exchange would not emerge until 1792, spreading the model across the Atlantic.

Stocks represent ownership in companies, and the stock market is where investors buy and sell them. Stock values fluctuate based on company performance and market conditions, including the ability to adapt to technological changes like AI.

Stocks of businesses that embraced technological advancements over the centuries have survived economic cycles, wars and disruptions that technology brought along. Without the benefit of hindsight, the same seems likely for companies betting on AI.

Specifically, companies that apply AI through automation, data analytics and new business models are likely to succeed.

Historically, market indexes like the S&P 500 have delivered approximately 7%-10% annualized returns over decades, adjusted for inflation. The index tracks the performance of 500 of the largest publicly traded US companies and is widely used as a benchmark for the overall stock market.

Compared to the S&P 500, Bitcoin’s (BTC) performance has been exceptionally higher, as shown in the table below:

What is the case for Bitcoin?

Bitcoin is a relatively new invention, created in 2009 by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto.

The project was introduced in a white paper detailing a peer-to-peer electronic cash system using blockchain technology.

The case for Bitcoin goes beyond the investment tool or store of value conception. Its proposal includes a true monetary revolution, which challenges gold and other financial tools.

Its decentralized design resists central control and the inflation common in fiat systems. With a fixed supply capped at 21 million coins, Bitcoin’s scarcity appeals to those seeking protection against monetary debasement.

Furthermore, blockchain’s transparency and security align well with AI’s need for verifiable data.

Over the years, Bitcoin has established itself as both a store of value and an alternative currency, while still pursuing its original goal of becoming a widely used medium of exchange.

How AI affects stocks and the stock market

The next 50 years could challenge the survival of the stock market as an institution due to “artificial intelligence speeding up innovation cycles, making public companies inefficient investment vehicles,” as predicted by analyst and investor Jordi Visser.

Stocks have been around a long time, but AI-driven disruptions leave little room for complacency, and companies that fail to adjust risk falling behind. This is especially true for tech giants like the FAANG stocks (Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google). While they are among the biggest investors in AI, these companies will still need to keep pace with rapid developments and adopt them effectively.

AI will also have an impact on the stock market, from quickly analyzing huge amounts of data to predicting market movements and automating decision-making processes, for faster and more efficient operations. AI will have an enormous impact on the way investors approach trading and investment strategies.

Overall, AI will likely boost corporate innovation but also widen the gap between adaptable and stagnant firms.

How AI affects Bitcoin

Visser sees Bitcoin as a better future investment and compares it to gold, which has endured for thousands of years.

Beyond its role as a store of value, Bitcoin is well-placed in the future of finance. The combination of AI and blockchain may disrupt traditional financial systems, bringing more capital and participants into the digital economy.

AI is expected to improve Bitcoin security and trading strategies, improving crypto trading through automated tools, enhanced data analysis and market pattern prediction. All these changes may also trigger better system efficiency.

Bitcoin mining will also benefit from AI in terms of efficiency and better resource allocation by predicting optimal times for mining activity to reduce costs and maximize output. System maintenance will improve as AI can detect existing or upcoming failures, thereby increasing its overall reliability.

However, Bitcoin faces regulatory risks, scalability issues and volatility, which may deter risk-averse investors who generally prefer more predictable and stable investment tools such as stocks.

The convergence of AI and blockchain could trigger a new era for Bitcoin, nurturing broader adoption by creating a more intuitive and secure ecosystem, giving it an edge over stagnant stocks.

Which will survive the next 50 years?

Looking 50 years ahead is practically impossible. Both Bitcoin and stocks have unique strengths and weaknesses, and their future ultimately depends on economic, technological and societal changes.

Stocks will likely endure if they adapt to AI-driven economies. Investors can mitigate risks of individual company failures by putting money into diversified portfolios, like index funds, which appear more secure. Stocks in robotics, biotech, space and AI may perform better than less tech-driven assets.

The advent of quantum computing is often discussed in relation to Bitcoin’s security model, though most experts agree the risk is still theoretical and distant. Combined with AI, its impact could be positive or negative depending on how the technology evolves and how the Bitcoin network adapts. Mining centralization might also be a concern if only a few entities gain early access to advanced quantum-AI systems.

On the other hand, the combination could be advancing Bitcoin security and network optimization by improving transaction processing, wallet security or blockchain analytics, enhancing Bitcoin’s efficiency and user experience. As long as the Bitcoin community stays ahead of the curve with quantum-resistant upgrades, the net impact could be positive.

As decentralized finance gains traction in investments, Bitcoin also enhances its competitive edge over gold. By doing so, it is emerging as a superior store of value and encouraging traditional markets to shift funds to digital finance.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Sentiment signals could spark the next rally
GameFi Guides

Buying their own stocks to survive

by admin



The third quarter is turning out to be a tough period for companies that followed in the footsteps of Michael Saylor’s Strategy (previously known as MicroStrategy).

The stock prices of these companies are slipping as their total share value dip below the worth of their crypto holdings.

Several digital asset treasuries, or DATs, began buying back their own stocks. FT reporter Nikou Asgari says this may be a sign of imminent collapse.

Summary

  • The stock prices of several Strategy copycats peaked shortly after the announcement of the cryptocurrency pivot.
  • Now they have to borrow up to $250 million to repurchase their shares as they hope the move will push the price up.
  • The trend aligns with the overall digital asset treasury sector turbulence. Many of them have lower value than the bitcoins they hold.

Buybacks

An FT report focuses on seven relatively small companies whose corporate Bitcoin journey has turned out to be rough. The article names Semler Scientific, ETHZilla, Empery Digital, CEA Industries, Metaplanet, SharpLink Gaming, and Ton Strategy. Five of them now have market capitalization below their Bitcoin holdings. 

Most of them made a crypto pivot only a few months ago. The pivot announcement was typically followed by a powerful short-term surge in stock prices and a subsequent decline. In recent weeks, all of these companies have resorted to buying back their shares, hoping it will boost their stock prices. 

These companies need to trade stocks above their underlying crypto assets. Otherwise, they won’t be able to follow Saylor’s strategy and keep purchasing crypto. These DATs raised dozens and hundreds of millions of dollars in debt to buy back their shares.

According to Asgari, these examples signify the soon-fading out of what he called “Bitcoin Treasury craze.” The article provides a comment from Morgan McCarthy, an analyst from a crypto analytics company Kaiko: “It’s probably the death rattle for a few [of these companies].”

McCarthy suggests these companies are trying to buy time in the hope that they will capitalize on the next crypto rally. 

At the same time, Asgari notes that share buybacks are not specific to the corporate crypto treasuries. It is a common strategy of companies looking to increase the price of their shares.

Semler Scientific and Strive Asset Management merger

While the FT article raises a question whether digital asset accumulation is a profitable strategy, it suggests that the collapse is not the only possible scenario. Asgari shows that struggling Bitcoin treasury companies may become targets for acquisitions. One such example is Semler Scientific, which was bought by Vivek Ramaswamy’s Strive Asset Management on September 22. The merger created the third-largest Bitcoin treasury (at 10,900 BTC) and a 210% premium for Semler shareholders.

The Wolf of All Streets podcast host Scott Melker suggested that this deal may mark the beginning of corporate Bitcoin space consolidation. He added that the Semler Scientific acquisition isn’t the last such merger and “almost certainly not the largest.”

Was ‘Paper Bitcoin summer’ hot?

In the first half of 2025, Bitcoin treasury companies were a really hyped topic. However, by July, there were several companies trying to repeat Saylor’s success through betting on other cryptocurrencies, including Ether, Dogecoin, Official Trump, and various other crypto assets. 

Around the same time, it became clear that many BTC treasuries perform poorly. One of the most notorious examples is David Bailey’s Nakamoto stock that plunged over 50% in a single day. 

DL News cites a former Goldman Sachs analyst, Dom Kwok, saying that the stock prices diverge from the underlying crypto prices, turning investors away.

One of the notable signs that digital asset treasury companies are facing troubles is that Metaplanet is eyeing a possible share buyback, too. Japanese company Metaplanet is the biggest corporate BTC holder in the region and the fifth-largest corporate Bitcoin treasury in the world.

The company CEO Simon Gerovich said that the company will possibly perform buybacks and release preferred shares. It may happen if the company’s market cap slides below the value of its BTC balance sheet.

Metaplanet just refinanced its “3rd bonds” series which had cash interest, personal guaranty, and collateral liens—much like MicroStrategy’s onerous $500 million 6.125% notes

Does anyone remember what happened to $MSTR mNAV after retiring their legacy debt on 9/24/24?

TLDR:🚀 pic.twitter.com/tBm7AjobFP

— Jeff Park (@dgt10011) June 30, 2025

More than that, the originator of the BTC treasury business playbook, Strategy itself, is facing some turbulence as well. At the end of August, Strategy lost around 15% of its value, effectively losing premium over its Bitcoin holdings.  

In 2025, Strategy released a series of preferred stocks, raising criticism over asset dilution or even “Ponzi vibes.” As Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies started to steal the show in July, Bitcoin’s treasuries somewhat lost their spotlight, losing much-needed investor money. As the company continues to buy Bitcoin (currently holding over 630,000 BTC), the MSTR stock continues to decline.

In 2024, MSTR’s total value was 2.5 to 3 times larger than Strategy’s Bitcoin holdings’ value. However, in August 2025, these figures came remarkably close. It undermined investors’ interest and limited the company’s opportunities for continuation of its strategy. In September, Strategy rejected by the S&P 500 committee, although many believed the company fits the index perfectly. 

Anyone who has traded crypto knows that beating bitcoin over time is nearly impossible.

You need impeccable timing and selection, even in alt season – because you always have to rotate back.

The treasury company situation is no different.

They are all trying to beat Bitcoin.

— The Wolf Of All Streets (@scottmelker) September 16, 2025

While the trend doesn’t necessarily mean that digital asset treasuries will disappear anytime soon, some ambitious projects backed by top-tier investors are continuing to emerge. However, they appear in the same reality where treasury companies are losing popularity and enjoy smaller returns. 

One notable example is Bullish, a highly hyped company backed by Peter Thiel. It was launched in August. Bullish is facing similar problems. Its current value is nearly identical to the value of its Bitcoin holdings. Time will tell if consolidation, in the form of mergers or otherwise, will save Bitcoin treasuries.





Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Plasma (Ramon Salinero/Unsplash)
NFT Gaming

Solana’s Yakovenko Says Bitcoin Must Upgrade to Survive Quantum Threat by 2030

by admin



Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko warned that Bitcoin developers must act to prepare for a possible quantum computing breakthrough that could render the network’s current security measures obsolete.

Speaking at the All-In Summit 2025, Yakovenko said there’s a “50/50” chance quantum computers will be powerful enough within five years to break the cryptographic protections securing Bitcoin wallets.

“We should migrate Bitcoin to a quantum-resistant signature scheme,” he said.

The concern stems from the possibility of quantum machines running algorithms like Shor’s, which could crack the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm currently protecting Bitcoin private keys. That would make it possible to forge transactions and compromise wallets, an existential risk for the network.

Community pushback

Bitcoin’s design doesn’t make such a change easy. A migration to post-quantum cryptography would require a hard fork, a highly contentious and technically complex process that would need widespread support across the network and would not be backward-compatible.

While Yakovenko stressed urgency, others in the crypto community aren’t convinced the threat is near. Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, estimated that the technology is still somewhat far away and even making Bitcoin quantum-ready is “relatively simple.”

Bitcoin Core contributor Peter Todd pointed out earlier on social media that quantum computers “don’t exist” as “the demos running toy problems do not count.” To Luke Dashjr, another Bitcoin Core contributor, quantum isn’t as much of a threat to Bitcoin now as spam and developer corruption, which the community can now address.

Yakovenko argued that advances in artificial intelligence show how quickly lab work can leap into the real world. The moment tech giants like Apple or Google roll out quantum-safe cryptographic stacks, he said, “it’s time to migrate.”



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Decrypt logo
GameFi Guides

‘Some Studios Won’t Survive’ as AI Takes Over Gaming, Says Google Cloud Exec

by admin



In brief

  • Google Cloud exec Jack Buser warned that rising costs and stagnant play time have left studios with a broken business model.
  • A recent Google Cloud study said nine of 10 developers now use AI tools somewhere in production.
  • While critics fear job losses and backlash as AI reshapes game design, Buser said AI can create “living games.”

Generative AI is triggering an industry-wide reckoning in gaming—and some studios won’t survive the fallout.

That’s the warning from Jack Buser, global games director at Google Cloud, who says the industry is entering an upheaval as big as any in its history.

“Some of these game companies are going to make it, and some of them are not,” Buser told Decrypt. “And some are going to be born through this revolution.”

Buser, a 30-year industry veteran, works with publishers and studios to adopt cloud infrastructure and AI, from scaling multiplayer systems to analyzing player data and testing generative tools. That role puts him at the intersection of big tech and game development, where studios connect to Google’s servers and AI models to build, or sustain, their titles.

He pointed out that AI is arriving just as developers face mounting financial pressure and shrinking player engagement with new games.

“Over half of play time is in games more than six years old,” he said. “So if you’re making a new game, you’re competing for less than half of the available play time. And if you’re the creator of one of those older games, you’re struggling to keep it relevant and keep players engaged.”

Following decades of growth, the global games industry dipped post-pandemic, with revenues falling in 2022 before recovering. In 2024, it generated $182.7 billion, up 3.2% from the year before. Revenues are expected to rise to $188.9 billion in 2025, a 3.4% increase.

“You have a broken business model, and the result is layoffs, game cancellations, and other problems across the games industry in recent years,” Buser said.



However, Buser believes generative AI could be the industry’s way out. A Harris Poll commissioned by Google found that nine out of 10 developers are already using AI tools in some part of the production process.

“If you go use case by use case in your development pipeline, from concept to quality assurance, and you attack every use case with AI, you can have quite a radical reduction in development time,” he said.

Developers are testing generative tools aimed at changing how games look, feel, and evolve in real time. Buser called this the era of the “living game”—titles that use AI in real time to analyze player behavior and generate new content on the fly. Unlike traditional games, which rely on patches and downloadable content (DLC) drops, these systems could adapt in minutes rather than months.

“Take Darth Vader in Fortnite, for example—the player reaction was strong,” Buser said. “We’re just scratching the surface.”

But the rollout wasn’t smooth. When Fortnite introduced an AI-powered Darth Vader earlier this year, the bot spewed racist and homophobic slurs before Epic Games quickly patched the system.

Not everyone welcomed the experiment. Following the release, SAG-AFTRA filed a labor complaint against Epic subsidiary Llama Productions, accusing the company of replacing voice actors with artificial intelligence without union consent.

“This charge concerns the union’s critical role in negotiating terms concerning the replacement of bargaining unit work with AI technology,” a SAG-AFTRA spokesperson told Decrypt. “We are very supportive of AI tools to enhance the audience experience, but employers cannot implement these types of uses without coming to the union first and bargaining terms.”

Buser drew comparisons between the increased role of AI and earlier shakeups in gaming history—moments when technological shifts redrew the industry map. Some companies adapted to the move from cartridges to CD-ROMs. Others didn’t.

“You will see some companies that did not make it,” Buser said. “And then you see other just massive game companies today that were what I’ll call CD-ROM-native. This is the exact same thing happening now.”

GG Newsletter

Get the latest web3 gaming news, hear directly from gaming studios and influencers covering the space, and receive power-ups from our partners.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Close