Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

sues

FTC Sues Gym Chains for Making It Hard to Cancel Memberships
Gaming Gear

FTC Sues Gym Chains for Making It Hard to Cancel Memberships

by admin August 20, 2025


The Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit against the operators of several gym chains, including LA Fitness, on Wednesday over allegations that they make it too difficult to cancel memberships. And that’s probably welcome news for anyone who’s had the displeasure of trying to cancel with their gym.

The companies being sued by the FTC are Fitness International and Fitness & Sports Clubs, which own gym chains like Esporta Fitness, City Sports Club, and Club Studio. The largest chain, LA Fitness, has over 600 locations across the U.S.

The 22-page complaint, which has been posted online, details how the FTC believes LA Fitness and others have created a cumbersome process for consumers to cancel. For starters, members are required to log in to their website and print off a cancellation form. But users are encouraged at sign-up to use the LA Fitness app and a QR code, meaning that many people apparently don’t know their login information for the website. There’s no way to cancel through the app, according to the FTC.

Customers who don’t know how to log in with their credentials need to jump through even more hoops to get them. The user must provide the original email address used to get the membership account, the “key tag number” handed out when they signed up, and the first five digits of the bank account or credit card number listed on the account, according to the complaint.

The cancellation form isn’t made publicly available on the company’s website and can only be found after users log in. And the form must be printed out, a very real hurdle for many households in the year 2025.

Even if you figure out how to log in with your credentials and print out the form, customers are required to either mail the form or bring the form to a physical location, where they’ll face even more hurdles. The FTC says customers are required to send cancellation forms via registered or certified mail. And even though most LA Fitness locations are open seven days a week, often for 19 hours a day, cancellations are only accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., when most people are at work.

Nobody really wants to take PTO to cancel their gym membership. And that’s how people can get stuck with gym memberships they no longer want.

The FTC’s press release announcing the lawsuit also alleges that LA Fitness has trained staff to reject requests to cancel by phone or email. And “consumers who try to cancel their memberships by stopping charges to their bank or credit card find they are rebilled, often under new account numbers.” The FTC says that violates the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA). Cancelling with nothing more than a click on the app seems like it would be a reasonable and consumer-friendly way to conduct business.

“The FTC’s complaint describes a scenario that too many Americans have experienced—a gym membership that seems impossible to cancel,” Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a press release.

“Tens of thousands of LA Fitness customers reported difficulties—cancellation was often restricted to specific times or required speaking to specific managers who were often not present or available. The FTC will not hesitate to act on behalf of consumers when it believes companies are stifling consumers’ ability to choose which recurring charges they want to keep.”

LA Fitness is far from the only business that seems to thrive on cumbersome auto-renewal policies. How many times have you signed up for a digital subscription of some kind and failed to cancel before you were charged again? It seems like an increasingly popular business model these days. And the FTC has taken notice.

Fitness International, the operator of LA Fitness, didn’t immediately respond to questions emailed on Wednesday. Gizmodo will update this post when we hear back.



Source link

August 20, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Louisiana sues Roblox for allegedly choosing "profits over child safety", claiming "it's basically open season for sex predators on this app"
Game Updates

Louisiana sues Roblox for allegedly choosing “profits over child safety”, claiming “it’s basically open season for sex predators on this app”

by admin August 17, 2025


The U.S. state of Louisiana is suing Roblox, alleging it facilitates “the sexual exploitation of Louisiana’s children”.

In a statement, Louisiana Attorney General, Liz Murrill, claimed Roblox “endangers the safety of the children” of the state, writing: “Roblox is overrun with harmful content and child predators because it prioritises user growth, revenue, and profits over child safety.

“Every parent should be aware of the clear and present danger posed to their children by Roblox so they can prevent the unthinkable from ever happening in their own home.”

The legal papers then names several “highly inappropriate” Roblox mini games such as Escape to Epstein Island, Public Bathroom Simulator, and Diddy Party.

“These games and others are often filled with sexually explicit material and simulated sexual activity such as child gang rape. A recent report even revealed a group of 3,334 members openly traded child pornography and solicited sexual acts from minors,” the Louisiana announcement says, citing a 2024 report.

Roblox is violating Louisiana law – choosing profits over child safety. It’s basically open season for sex predators on this platform. pic.twitter.com/fGSQ8IFgWw

— Attorney General Liz Murrill (@AGLizMurrill) August 15, 2025

To see this content please enable targeting cookies.

Manage cookie settings

The lawsuit claims that while Roblox requires children to have permission from their parents or guardians to open an account, the company “does nothing to confirm or document that parental permission has been given, no matter how young a child is. Nor does Defendant require a parent to confirm the age given when a child signs up to use Roblox”.

“[Roblox] has access to biometric age verification software that requires the user to take a photo of a government-issued ID along with a real-time selfie photo that is then verified through artificial intelligence,” the AG adds. “However, while Defendant utilises this software for other purposes, Defendant intentionally does not utilise this feature when new accounts are created.”

In a press conference announcing the lawsuit, Murrill said: “So [Roblox] have chosen profits over child safety. It’s basically open season for sex predators on this app. For this reason, and all of the others that we’ve talked about today, Roblox is violating Louisiana law, and that’s why we filed this lawsuit.”

Roblox said it does not comment on pending litigation, but stressed “it would like to address erroneous claims and misconceptions about our platform, our commitment to safety, and our overall safety track record”.

“Every day, tens of millions of people around the world use Roblox to learn STEM skills, play, and imagine, and have a safe experience on our platform. Any assertion that Roblox would intentionally put our users at risk of exploitation is simply untrue. No system is perfect, and bad actors adapt to evade detection, including efforts to take users to other platforms, where safety standards and moderation practices may differ. We continuously work to block those efforts and to enhance our moderation approaches to promote a safe and enjoyable environment for all users.”

It added that it is constantly innovating safety tools and launching new safeguards, has taken an industry-leading stance on age-based communication, and serves players of which 64 percent are aged 13 or over. It also dedicates substantial resources to help detect and prevent inappropriate content and behaviour, and collaborates with law enforcement and government agencies, as well as mental health organisations, child safety organisations, and parental advocacy groups “to keep users safe on the platform”.

“We know safety is critically important to families, and we strive to empower our community of parents and caregivers to help ensure a safe online experience for their children. This includes a suite of easy-to-use parental controls to provide parents with more control and clarity on what their kids and teens are doing on Roblox,” the statement concludes.

“We aim to create one of the safest online environments for users, a goal not only core to our founding values but contrary to certain assertions, one we believe is critical to our long-term vision and success. We understand there is always more work to be done, and we are committed to making Roblox a safe and positive environment for all users.”





Source link

August 17, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Wisconsin sues Miami for tampering with football transfer
Esports

Wisconsin sues Miami for tampering with football transfer

by admin June 20, 2025


  • Dan MurphyJun 20, 2025, 03:51 PM ET

    Close

    • Covers the Big Ten
    • Joined ESPN.com in 2014
    • Graduate of the University of Notre Dame

The University of Wisconsin filed a lawsuit Friday claiming Miami’s football team broke the law by tampering with a Badgers player, a first-of-its-kind legal attempt to enforce the terms of a financial contract between a football player and his school.

The lawsuit refers to the athlete in question as “Student Athlete A,” but details from the complaint line up with the offseason transfer of freshman defensive back Xavier Lucas. Lucas left Wisconsin and enrolled at Miami in January after saying the Badgers staff refused to enter his name in the transfer portal last December.

In the complaint filed Friday, Wisconsin claims that a Miami staff member and a prominent alumnus met with Lucas and his family at a relative’s home in Florida and offered him money to transfer shortly after Lucas signed a two-year contract last December. The lawsuit states that Miami committed tortious interference by knowingly compelling a player to break the terms of his deal with the Badgers.

“While we reluctantly bring this case, we stand by our position that respecting and enforcing contractual obligations is essential to maintaining a level playing field,” the school said in a statement provided to ESPN on Friday.

According to the complaint, Wisconsin decided to file suit in hopes that “during this watershed time for college athletics, this case will advance the overall integrity of the game by holding programs legally accountable when they wrongfully interfere with contractual commitments.”

Representatives from the University of Miami did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Editor’s Picks

1 Related

The pending case promises to be an interesting test of whether schools can use name, image and likeness (NIL) deals to keep athletes from transferring even though the players aren’t technically employees. Starting July 1, schools will being paying their athletes directly via NIL deals.

The contracts between Wisconsin and their athletes gives the school the non-exclusive rights to use a player’s NIL in promotions. Part of the deal, according to the lawsuit, prohibits an athlete from making any commitments to enroll or play sports at other schools. The lawsuit says Wisconsin had a reasonable expectation that Lucas would “continue to participate as a member of its football program” until the deal ended.

However, according to several contracts between Big Ten schools and their players that ESPN has previously reviewed, these deals explicitly state that athletes are not being paid to play football for the university. Since the school is technically only paying to use the player’s NIL rights, it’s not clear if a judge will consider it fair to enforce a part of the contract that dictates where the player attends school.

The Big Ten said in a statement Friday that it supports Wisconsin’s decision to file the lawsuit and that Miami’s alleged actions “are irreconcilable with a sustainable college sports framework.”

Darren Heitner, a Florida-based attorney who represents Xavier Lucas, told ESPN that Wisconsin did not file any legal claims against Lucas and declined to comment further.



Source link

June 20, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
X sues New York over hate speech disclosure law
Product Reviews

X sues New York over hate speech disclosure law

by admin June 18, 2025


Social media company X has filed a lawsuit against the state of New York over a law governing hate speech. The social network’s Global Government Affairs account posted about the suit, claiming the law’s required disclosures infringe on First Amendment protections for free speech.

The Stop Hiding Hate Act, which is slated to take effect this week, would require social media companies to report on how they define and moderate content including hate speech, misinformation, disinformation, harassment and foreign political influence.

X sued California in 2023 about a similar state-level law regarding content moderation. A panel from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals put a hold on the lower court’s initial ruling in favor of California. While the law did endure, a settlement between the state and the company at the start of 2025 led to the elimination of the provisions that X claimed were unconstitutional.



Source link

June 18, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Decrypt logo
Crypto Trends

Ethereum Token Platform Zora Sues Deloitte Over AI Trademark Dispute

by admin June 12, 2025



In brief

  • Zora filed a lawsuit and restraining order seeking to stop Deloitte from using “Zora,” “Zora AI,” or the Zora.ai domain, demanding damages and domain transfer.
  • Deloitte launched its Zora AI productivity platform in March 2024 after dismissing Zora’s February cease-and-desist letter, arguing their services target different audiences with no consumer confusion risk.
  • The dispute is particularly contentious because Zora has been a paying client of Deloitte since 2022, with Zora’s lawyers calling it a “blatant disregard of its clients’ basic intellectual rights.”

Ethereum token platform Zora has sued Deloitte to stop it from using the “Zora AI” name for its digital workforce AI platform, claiming trademark infringement.

The company also filed a restraining order, which has yet to be granted, that would bar Deloitte from using “Zora,” “Zora AI,” or the Zora.ai domain until the conclusion of the lawsuit.

The token launchpad is seeking actual and punitive damages, and for Deloitte to cover its attorney fees. It also wants Deloitte to transfer the Zora.ai domain.

Zora gained steam during the NFT bull run of 2021-22, raising $50 million in funding in 2022 that valued the firm at $600 million.

More recently, it has functioned as a social media platform that automatically turns every post into a token on Coinbase’s Ethereum layer-2 network, Base. It sparked a flurry of hype after the creator of Base, Coinbase’s Jesse Pollak, went on a “content coin” campaign.

When it launched in April, the ZORA token briefly climbed as high as $0.03438 on its opening day, but has since slumped to $0.009324—down 73% from peak. The token has seen $21.7 million worth of trading volume in the past day and currently has a market cap of $29 million.

Neither Deloitte nor Zora immediately responded to requests from Decrypt for comment.

A letter sent to Deloitte claims its new AI product “wrongly capitalizes on Zora’s goodwill and reputation,” and “creates a false association between Deloitte and Zora and the ZORA Marks.”  Deloitte’s infringements of Zora’s rights must immediately stop, it demands.

Deloitte first started marketing its new AI platform in March, promoting it as a suite of “ready-to-deploy” agents that can augment clients’ workforces. In its press release, the company said Hewlett Packard is already using the tech to analyze its financial statements.

The token launchpad caught wind of the company’s plans and sent a letter asking it to reconsider the name of the product a month before Deloitte started promoting it.

“As you must be aware, Zora is one of the most prominent marketplace platforms in which users can mint, buy, offer for sale, sell, and curate NFTs. Zora provides an innovative AI-driven method, including for consumers to use in creating NFTs and undertaking NFT-related transactions,” the company’s lawyers wrote in a Feb. 14 letter to Deloitte.



The company included a copy of its trademarks, the earliest of which was filed in May 2020. The most recent trademark was granted in March 2025. The trademarks protect the company’s use of “Zora” in relation to downloadable mobile apps or software, cryptocurrency exchange services, and non-downloadable web applications.

Stephen Barrese, a trademark attorney at Dilworth & Barrese, told Decrypt that if Deloitte’s attorneys did a search, they would have seen pending applications for two of Zora’s most recent trademarks.

“Both were filed as ‘intent to use,’ which means that they get a ‘constructive use date’ at the time of filing,” he said, hypothesizing that someone at Deloitte might have missed that detail.

“This explains why Deloitte’s argument is that there’s no way that people would confuse the NFT platform with their digital workforce platform,” Barrese added. “They cannot say that they were unaware of the prior filed applications.”

Sure enough, that’s exactly how Deloitte responded to Zora’s letter a few weeks later.

“We do not believe that you or your client should have any cause for concern,” Deloitte wrote in response. “Our use of ‘Zora AI’ is for different goods and services than those offered by your client, as well as intended for a different audience than your client, such that there would not be any likelihood of consumer confusion.”

A response from Zora in March goes even further, pointing out that Zora has been a client of Deloitte since 2022, and blasts the firm’s “blatant disregard of its clients’ basic intellectual rights.”

The complaint includes an email that notes the token launchpad was being advised by Rob Massey, who’s a tax leader in Deloitte’s blockchain and digital assets practice.

“Rob asked that Zora give him the opportunity to discuss internally and thus hold off on escalating this matter to a court,” Zora attorney Merri Moken wrote in an email last week ahead of the June 9 deadline she’d given Deloitte to respond.

The lawsuit was filed on June 11 in the Southern District of New York and has been assigned to Judge Arun Subramanian.

Edited by Andrew Hayward

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.



Source link

June 12, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Epic sues creator and resellers of Fortnite cheat software
Esports

Epic sues creator and resellers of Fortnite cheat software

by admin June 11, 2025


Epic Games has filed a new lawsuit against Fortnite cheat software developer, Sincey Cheats and Vanta Cheats.

The legal case, as spotted by Polygon, is targeting both the creator of the aimbot software and a number of their resellers. The case has been filed in North Carolina, where Epic Games is headquartered, with Epic reporting it has taken action against “tens of thousands of Fortnite accounts” that have been caught using Sincey Cheats cheat software since February 2022. In the U.S. alone, Epic purports it has banned “over 15,000” accounts.

Epic Games alleges that Ediz Atas, aka Sincey Cheats and Vanta Cheats, has profited from developing and selling cheat software for its prized battle royale Fortnite “since at least January 2023.” The firm says the software gives players unfair advantages against players who don’t cheat, breaching its EULA and circumventing the developer’s anti-cheat software. It also alleges this hurts Epic’s bottom line, as widespread cheating could put legitimate players off, resulting in a loss of sales in season passes and cosmetics.

The company is also suing five unnamed defendants for reselling the software.

Though Epic did not indicate a dollar amount for compensation, Polygon said it’s suing for statutory and compensatory damages for lost profits, attorney’s fees, and other costs associated with the lawsuit.

The SAG-AFTRA union recently filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board against Epic Games for using AI to portray Darth Vader in Fortnite.



Source link

June 11, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Decrypt logo
NFT Gaming

ASIC Sues Former Blockchain Global Exec Over $20M in Unpaid Customer Claims

by admin May 28, 2025



In brief

  • ASIC has filed civil charges against former Blockchain Global director Liang Guo over alleged misuse of ACX customer funds totaling over $20 million.
  • The regulator’s investigation began in January 2024 after years of red flags, including a 2017 IPO stop order and an October 2023 liquidator report detailing misappropriated assets.
  • The firm’s co-director, Sam Lee, was charged in the U.S. the same month for allegedly leading a $1.89 billion Ponzi scheme tied to HyperFund and HyperVerse.

A former director of the collapsed Australian crypto exchange ACX.io is facing civil court action over what regulators allege are serious breaches tied to the disappearance of millions in customer funds.

On Wednesday, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission announced proceedings against Liang “Allan” Guo, accusing him of misusing user funds, failing to keep proper financial records, and making misleading statements while serving as a director at Blockchain Global Ltd. 

The company, now in liquidation, operated the ACX exchange, which froze withdrawals in late 2019 and ultimately left over $20 million in claims from former customers.

The lawsuit is the culmination of a years-long investigation into one of Australia’s earliest and most damaging crypto exchange failures. 

Liquidators estimate that ACX users are owed at least $22.7 million of the company’s total debt of $58.6 million to unsecured creditors.

The regulator had previously halted Blockchain Global’s 2017 IPO bid and refused it a financial services license, citing governance concerns.

ASIC launched its formal investigation into the exchange’s collapse in January 2024. Weeks later, the Federal Court imposed interim travel restrictions on Guo. 

When those expired on August 20, he left the country on September 23 and has not returned.

Same story, different exchange

In an October 2023 report to ASIC and creditors, liquidator Andrew Yeo of Pitcher Partners found that customer funds were co-mingled with company money and redirected into related entities, as cited by ABC News.

That’s reminiscent of former global exchange FTX’s misuse of customer funds, where billions were allegedly diverted to its affiliated trading firm, Alameda Research, without user consent.

Guo told liquidators that wallet credentials for Blockchain Global’s crypto holdings, worth several million dollars, were lost when his laptop was stolen in China in 2019. 

As first reported in December 2021 by The Sydney Morning Herald, no police report was ever filed to substantiate the claim.

Blockchain Global’s other directors, Xue “Sam” Lee and Zijang “Ryan” Xu, are also under investigation by ASIC. 

In the same month the probe began, Lee was charged by U.S. authorities with allegedly running a $1.89 billion Ponzi scheme under the HyperTech umbrella, which included HyperFund and HyperVerse.

U.S. prosecutors unsealed criminal wire fraud and securities fraud charges against Lee, accusing him of promoting bogus investment platforms with false promises of crypto mining returns. 

The SEC also filed a civil complaint the same day against Lee and promoter Brenda “Bitcoin Beautee” Chunga, who later pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit securities and wire fraud.

Edited by Sebastian Sinclair

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

May 28, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Bancor sues Uniswap for patent infringement
GameFi Guides

Bancor sues Uniswap for patent infringement

by admin May 21, 2025



Bprotocol Foundation and LocalCoin have filed a lawsuit against Uniswap Labs and the Uniswap Foundation, alleging patent infringement.

On May 20, 2025, the Bprotocol Foundation and LocalCoin, entities behind Bancor Protocol and the Bancor token BNT, announced the lawsuit against Uniswap (UNI). The platforms filed the lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Bancor is accusing Uniswap for infringing on the protocol’s patents around technology on smart contracts use in decentralized trading. Uniswap is a leading decentralized exchange that commands huge volumes and users in the crypto market.

In the lawsuit, Bancor alleges that Uniswap has used its patented technology underpinning the constant product automated market maker (CPAMM), the core mechanism powering the Uniswap Protocol. Bprotocol and LocalCoin claim this constitutes unauthorized use of proprietary technology.

“When an organization continuously uses our invention without our authorization and does so as a means of competing with us, we must take action,” reads part of the press release Bancor published on Tuesday.

The project claims Uniswap has relied on this technology over the past eight years, all without permission from Bancor.

The legal action, according to Bprotocol Foundation and LocalCoin, is intended to defend their intellectual property from continued unlicensed use.

Bancor filed for a patent for its decentralized trading technology in 2017, having invented it in 2016. It’s the same technology that it used to launch its AMM powered DEX protocol.

Bprotocol Foundation and LocalCoin say they own all rights pertaining to the invention, and that Uniswap Labs has illegally used it in the Uniswap Protocol since launching v1 in November 2018. The protocol unveiled its new DEX platform Carbon in April 2023.

The Uniswap Protocol meanwhile has grown since v1.

Recently, it crossed the $3 trillion cumulative swap volume, a milestone that comes amid a resurgence in the DeFi market.

Meanwhile, the total value locked in the protocol has increased significantly amid upgrades that have seen Uniswap launch v4.

According to DeFiLlama data, Uniswap TVL currently stands at over $4.8 billion.



Source link

May 21, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (909)
  • Esports (689)
  • Game Reviews (639)
  • Game Updates (805)
  • GameFi Guides (903)
  • Gaming Gear (868)
  • NFT Gaming (885)
  • Product Reviews (858)
  • Uncategorized (1)

Recent Posts

  • Bitcoin Holds $113K Support, Can BTC Break Above $117.5K?
  • Keeper Is A Salvador Dali-Inspired Surrealist Adventure With No Dialogue, No Combat, And A Walking Lighthouse
  • Shokz OpenDots One review: reliable clip-on headphones that undercut the Bose
  • Winklevoss Twins Donate $21 Million in Bitcoin to Pro-Trump, Anti-Democrat Crypto PAC
  • Bitcoin STH Capitulate: $5.69B In Losses Hit Exchanges In 48 Hours

Recent Posts

  • Bitcoin Holds $113K Support, Can BTC Break Above $117.5K?

    August 21, 2025
  • Keeper Is A Salvador Dali-Inspired Surrealist Adventure With No Dialogue, No Combat, And A Walking Lighthouse

    August 21, 2025
  • Shokz OpenDots One review: reliable clip-on headphones that undercut the Bose

    August 21, 2025
  • Winklevoss Twins Donate $21 Million in Bitcoin to Pro-Trump, Anti-Democrat Crypto PAC

    August 21, 2025
  • Bitcoin STH Capitulate: $5.69B In Losses Hit Exchanges In 48 Hours

    August 21, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • Bitcoin Holds $113K Support, Can BTC Break Above $117.5K?

    August 21, 2025
  • Keeper Is A Salvador Dali-Inspired Surrealist Adventure With No Dialogue, No Combat, And A Walking Lighthouse

    August 21, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close