Tag:

solution

From Slow to Hyper: Bitcoin Hyper Tipped as Uptober’s Next 1000x Crypto
GameFi Guides

Why Bitcoin Hyper Is Next 1000x Crypto in Uptober: Innovative Bitcoin Solution

by admin


Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Bitcoin is the king of crypto. It’s the biggest, most trusted digital asset in the world.

But let’s be real – using Bitcoin for fast payments or DeFi has always been a headache. It’s slow, expensive, and not built for the chaos of meme coins or dApps.

Enter Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER), a new Layer 2 project that promises to give Bitcoin the facelift it has been waiting for.

With speed, low fees, and full DeFi compatibility, Bitcoin Hyper might just be the next 1000x crypto in Uptober.

The Problem: Bitcoin’s Scalability Gap

Bitcoin has always been a store of value first, a payment network second.

Source: Reddit

That worked when the main use case was simply ‘buy and hold.’ But as crypto culture exploded, Bitcoin’s limitations became obvious.

While Ethereum and Solana were running meme coins, NFTs, and DeFi apps at full throttle, Bitcoin was left sitting on the sidelines.

Fees spiked during bull runs, transactions slowed to a crawl, and forget about trying to run complex apps directly on the chain.

Bitcoin might be the biggest crypto by market cap, but it couldn’t keep up with the modern demands of builders, traders, and degens. This lack of scalability is the exact gap Bitcoin Hyper is designed to fill.

The Solution: Bitcoin Hyper Brings Speed and Power

Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is a real Bitcoin Layer 2 built using the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM).

That’s important, because it brings Solana’s lightning speed and cheap fees straight into the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Here’s how it works: you bridge $BTC into the network, it gets verified and minted on the Layer 2, and then you can trade, stake, or run dApps instantly.

Transactions are bundled with zero-knowledge proofs and regularly synced back to Bitcoin’s Layer 1 for security.

What does this mean in plain English? You can move Bitcoin around in sub-seconds with near-zero gas fees, all while staying connected to Bitcoin’s base chain.

Payments, DeFi, meme coins, even NFTs – it’s all on the table now for Bitcoin users. Finally, Bitcoin can do it all.

Why $HYPER Is the Token to Watch

Every transaction in this ecosystem runs on $HYPER. It’s the fuel for staking, governance, and app launches.

That means the more people use Bitcoin Hyper, the more demand there is for the token. The presale numbers already tell the story: $19.5M raised so far, and you can buy $HYPER for $0.013015.

At the same time, whale activity around Bitcoin has been heating up, with fresh buys of $12.3K and $10.9K recorded just last night – another sign that confidence in Bitcoin’s growth cycle is back on.

Early buyers also get priority access to staking rewards, token launches, and governance. Think of it like a VIP ticket to Bitcoin’s new playground.

And in Uptober, when the market heats up and everyone’s chasing the next big thing, $HYPER looks positioned to take off. If you’ve been looking for the best presale of the season, this project checks all the boxes.

The Bigger Picture: Bitcoin’s Second Act

The wild part is what this means for Bitcoin itself. For years, Bitcoin has been called ‘digital gold.’ Great as a store of value, but boring compared to the best altcoins running the show in DeFi and memes.

Bitcoin Hyper flips that script. It gives Bitcoin an execution layer where builders can launch dApps, DAOs, and meme coins directly tied to the world’s largest crypto.

That could unlock new demand and push Bitcoin even further up the ranks.

If Bitcoin is already the number one asset in crypto, imagine what happens when it becomes the most usable one too.

It’s like giving a vintage sports car a brand-new turbo engine – the same classic design, but now it roars on the track.

Bitcoin’s Next Big Chapter Starts Here

Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is more than just a new crypto project. It’s a serious attempt to make Bitcoin relevant for the fast, experimental world of DeFi and meme culture.

With a working solution, a huge presale, and Uptober momentum, $HYPER might just be the ticket to Bitcoin’s next big chapter.

This article is for informational purposes only. Always do your own research (DYOR) before investing in crypto.

Authored by Bogdan Patru for Bitcoinist: https://bitcoinist.com/from-slow-to-hyper-bitcoin-hyper-tipped-as-uptobers-next-1000x-crypto

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
China Finds Ingenious Solution for Its Decommissioned Wind Turbine Blades
Gaming Gear

China Finds Ingenious Solution for Its Decommissioned Wind Turbine Blades

by admin



Many wind turbine blades in China are approaching retirement, and researchers have come up with a creative way to reuse the giant components.

In a study published earlier this summer in the journal International Soil and Water Conservation Research, scientists suggest repurposing decommissioned wind turbine blades in sand control measures. Namely, in sand barriers. The approach could be the solution to two problems: dealing with old blades and finding optimal sand control measures.

“Wind turbine blades with high strength and durability can be directly cut and drilled into sand barriers,” the researchers wrote in the paper. “This approach not only addresses the recycling challenges of decommissioned wind turbine blades but also mitigates the shortage of windbreak and sand stabilization materials in the desert and the Gobi areas.”

Two birds with one stone

In arid and semiarid regions, wind can wreak havoc on both human and natural landscapes, and sand control measures such as sand barriers aim to decrease the resulting economic losses and protect habitats. While sand barriers such as those made out of reeds and branches are inexpensive, easy to construct, and environmentally friendly, they’re short-lived and don’t hold up well to extreme environments.

More effective artificial sand control materials don’t offer perfect solutions, because they also face challenges in extremely windy areas along railways. As such, people sometimes turn to stronger barriers made of materials such as cement, metal, and rocky sand. Ultimately, the materials should be strong, long-lasting, wind-abrasion-resistant, thermally stable, available, reasonably priced, and with optimal porosity.

As for the wind power industry, the question of what to do with old wind turbine blades faces high costs and complex traditional recycling processes, in addition to the risk of pollution in the case of improper management.

As such, the researchers investigated the efficacy of sand barriers made from decommissioned or damaged wind turbine blades. “First, we tested the mechanical properties of this material, including ultraviolet (UV) aging resistance, thermal stability, bending strength, and erosion resistance,” the researchers explained in the paper. “Second, through wind tunnel experiments and numerical simulations, we analyzed the shelter and sand stabilization effects of the new sand barriers with different porosities compared with traditional nylon net sand barriers.”

Real-life application

The approach revealed that the new barrier’s erosion rate can be 56% lower than that of wood composite materials, and its bending strength was 14 times greater. The researchers also found that a porosity of 20% was the best for the reduction of sediment transport.

“Therefore, the new porous sand barriers made from decommissioned or damaged wind turbine blades possess excellent UV and erosion resistance, high strength and thermal stability, recyclability, and long service life,” the researchers concluded. “It combines the porous structure of flexible sand barriers with the strength of rigid sand barriers, making it well-suited for regions with strong winds, large temperature variations, and intense UV radiation, which has significant potential for application in sand control practices.”

The study is the ultimate reminder of an age-old saying—one person’s trash is another person’s treasure. Or, in this case, one industry’s trash is another’s solution.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Part-MMO, part-FPS, Eve Vanguard's devs are toying with a fascinating solution for bad in-game behaviour: leverage toxic players' actions for content
Game Updates

Part-MMO, part-FPS, Eve Vanguard’s devs are toying with a fascinating solution for bad in-game behaviour: leverage toxic players’ actions for content

by admin


Eve Vanguard is a strange proposition: part-MMO, part-FPS, part-companion game to the seemingly eternal juggernaut that is Eve Online, it’s developer CCP’s latest attempt to make a shooter that works as part of the storied universe. And I think, so far, it shows a lot of promise. The potential in Vanguard is the result of a passionate team being given (relatively) free rein to do what they want, as long as it’s fun and abides by the Eve bible. In a world where many developers are looking at smaller games with shorter development cycles, Vanguard’s gestation time – and trust from its parent company – is an increasingly rare thing.

But it’s driven by trust, and a genuine desire to see something like Vanguard finally take off. Bigwigs at CCP have told me, directly, that getting a shooter in the world of Eve to work is “an age-old dream CCP has been wanting to realise.” And it’s not for lack of trying. Previously, we’ve had Dust 514, the cult MMOFPS PS3 game that CCP worked on with Sony in 2013, which shut down in 2016. Since then, we’ve heard about both Project Nova and Project Legion, neither of which made it to release. Now, there’s Vanguard – a game I’ve personally been following for quite some time.

CCP’s vision for the world of Vanguard is as expansive as it is pretty. | Image credit: CCP Games

As such, I’ve seen the development process first-hand, seen how the ambitious shooter fleshes out. I’ve played it when the guns didn’t even really have models, when enemies were just amorphous grey blobs. But CCP London has been open about it every step of the way – and when it unveiled the new direction (more 00s space shooter than bland military sim), I was thrilled. It offered something different: a take on the Tarkov-like shooter that puts fun before punishment.

Now, the developer is ready to show off the next aspect of its vision: from the FPS side to the MMO side. Right now, there’s a flotilla of dissatisfied players from Destiny 2 looking for a new home. Marathon’s internal and external issues are well-documented, and it doesn’t bode well for launch. There’s Arc Raiders, which has some hype, and Helldivers 2 continues to dominate the landscape, but there’s just about enough room for Vanguard to muscle in on the action, thinks CCP London. But the social aspect of these games is skinnier than what Davis envisions for Vanguard.

Watch on YouTube

This past week, Vanguard launched ‘Operation Nemesis’, a huge update that was designed to explain the tenets of the game. It has a complete tutorial, a taster of the sort of content you can expect in the final game, and – perhaps most importantly – a live environment where you can meet, interact with (and perhaps get absolutely obliterated by) other players. Generally speaking, when you’re on the ground, you’re fair game: you can work with other teams to extract loot and materials – a rising tide helps all ships, so they say – or you can be a dick and eliminate another team and snatch their loot. It’s the PvPvE way, alas, and has a high-percent chance of being incredibly toxic. But therein, perhaps, lies the fun.

“There are some safeguards we can already draw in,” explains Scott Davis, game director on Eve Vanguard. “Eve Online already has this concept of high-sec, low-sec and null-sec.” For clarity, high security spaces have a higher presence of NPC enforcement troops, which diminish as you go down in classification – mess with other players in high-sec, and you’re going to get some bad attention. “You always start at high-sec, and you tend to be moving into low-sec areas. And that helps to give some guardrails or some safety nets around the more player-versus-player driven parts of the game. We’ll be using those same aspects in Vanguard.”

The baseline of the Vanguard experience is the gunplay – and let me tell you, it is excellent.Image credit: CCP Games

Some of the persistent, strategic zones (which are called ‘bastions’ in Vanguard parlance) will, therefore, have no PvP at all. If you don’t want to get ganked whilst going on a nice mining mission to pick up some ore, you can chill out there. “I play Final Fantasy 14 like a single-player game,” explains Davis, “just with lots of other people around me. And it feels richer because of that. And that’s something I think we can lean into.” That’s what these high-sec ‘bastions’ will look like: pleasant MMO hubs, with “me and my friends running around, doing lots of PvE things”. It’s “mingleplayer”, says Davis.

I love that term: that’s how I spent a lot of my time in both Destiny and FF14. In Destiny, I’d often go off and play PvP as a lone wolf, head back to The Tower, dance with some randos, and then jet off to do some strikes. Seeing other people going about their business was all part of the joy. In Final Fantasy 14, I liked to play a chef; getting ingredients and cooking dishes for players before hitting up a raid. It’s a good way to make friends. But any game operating in an online space has the potential for bad behaviour. That’s not a problem for Vanguard, though.

“But even in that first bastion, you’ll be aware that there are these high-sec planets and low-sec planets and null-sec planets. So if you want to be an absolute bastard, there are specific places you can go to do that. And then anyone who goes there knows that there’s a higher propensity for bastardry in those spaces.”

But that’s not to say that the high-sec portions of the game will be completely safe for the pacifists amongst us. “We’re also thinking, ‘how can we make high-sec cool?’,” explains Davis. “The idea that I shoot you but I’m just not dealing damage to you is an easy way of solving that problem, but are there much more interesting ways of doing that? I think there are. In Eve Online, you can destroy other ships, but then you get a ‘wanted level’, and then police are after you – what if, in these high-sec worlds, you can kill another player, but then all this stuff happens.

“Suddenly, a Space Police Concord drops right next to you. You show up on the map. Security forces announce: ‘right, everyone’s got infinite respawns until this person dies!’ It takes me back to playing DayZ, when you get a player-killer on the server, and then all of a sudden the whole server now wants to rally against the player killer. It’s putting more power into the people to solve the problem. It dissuades you from wanting to do PvP, but sometimes you might just think, ‘I want to cause that to happen. I want a big fight, I want the whole server against me’.”

A fresh batch of Vanguard screenshots, showing off one of the ‘sandbox lite’ areas of the game, alongside the latest version of Vanguard’s brilliant weapons. | Image credit: CCP Games

One of the very Eve Online anecdotes I was told at CCP’s studio is that, recently, the leader of an in-game corporation sided with another corporation out of nowhere. This person started deleting the assets of all the other corporations before he was caught. It was a scandal. “That’s not something you would ever engineer,” laughs Davis. “There’s a system that you make and players just rip, tear, and rend in their own way.”

It very much sounds like CCP London wants to take that philosophy from the main Eve game and shape it into something that works in an MMOFPS. As we see Helldivers 2 devs act like dungeon masters as players opt to cause in-universe havoc, and people bounce off Destiny 2 as its narrative and development direction feels increasingly out-of-touch with the players, it’s a fascinating prospect. Of course, it’s still early days and there is plenty that will be ironed out as the game heads towards a proper early access release next year, but for now, I’m very much picking up what Vanguard is putting down. I just hope it can stick the landing.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Pepeto presale shows early momentum; Investors take notice
NFT Gaming

A demand-driven solution to crypto volatility

by admin



Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Canxium positions itself as an alternative to Bitcoin and stablecoins by introducing demand-driven supply and predictable mining costs aimed at making crypto usable as electronic cash.

Summary

  • The Canxium project adjusts coin supply based on transaction demand to limit volatility.
  • Its mining model sets costs in advance, offering more predictable economics.
  • Canxium’s design aims to support everyday use rather than speculation.

In crypto, two problems dominate: volatility and centralization. Launched in 2023, Canxium (CAU) has grown into a project with a market cap around $400k to $430k and a current price range near $0.32 to $0.34, according to CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap. The Canxium system is designed to promote more predictable and decentralized mining costs, aiming to improve usability as cash, though past performance and technical mechanisms do not guarantee future results or full price stability.

This article explains why Bitcoin and stablecoins fail as cash, how Canxium aims to address some of the challenges observed in traditional PoW and stablecoin models through its demand-driven supply and Retained Proof of Work (RdPoW), and what this means for miners, users, and the future of electronic money.

Volatility and centralization

Bitcoin, the progenitor of crypto, promised peer-to-peer electronic cash but devolved into a speculative asset. Its rigid 21 million supply cap ignores real demand, leading to wild price swings driven by hype rather than utility. Booms draw in miners, spiking difficulty and energy bills, while busts trigger mass exits and erode security. Transaction fees explode during congestion and far from Satoshi’s ideal.

Stablecoins such as USDC and USDT provide stability by pegging to fiat currencies and are managed by centralized entities, which some criticize for resulting in counterparty risk and less decentralization, though they remain popular solutions in the market. Pegged to fiat, they offer apparent stability but at the cost of decentralization. Controlled by issuers like Circle or Tether, they are vulnerable to freezes, blacklists, and regulatory whims. Billions in reserves sit in opaque banks, inviting censorship and counterparty risk. 

The crypto industry, riddled with these contradictions, has failed to deliver true money: a medium of exchange that is stable in production, adaptive to markets, and free from central control.

Stable mining costs through demand-driven supply

At Canxium’s heart is a revolutionary supply mechanism that mirrors natural markets and ensures stable mining costs while remaining fully decentralized. Unlike Bitcoin’s arbitrary halvings or stablecoins’ algorithmic tweaks, CAU issuance responds directly to demand. High transaction volume signals need and prompts more CAU production to keep fees low and prevent bottlenecks. Low demand curtails supply, avoiding inflationary dilution and preserving scarcity.

This dynamic is powered by Retained Proof of Work (RdPoW), where miners compute proofs offline and submit them flexibly, fixing costs per CAU unit regardless of external volatility. Energy, hardware, and time inputs yield predictable outputs anchored by real-world economics rather than speculative frenzy. As Canxium’s documentation asserts, this creates a “cost floor” for CAU, where each token’s production mirrors tangible value creation.

The egg market analogy

To illustrate, consider the egg market. Farmers produce eggs at a roughly fixed cost: for example, $1 per egg for feed, electricity, water, and stock. When demand surges, perhaps during holidays, prices rise to $1.50. Farmers pocket $0.50 profit per egg, incentivizing expansion with more hens and more output. Supply increases, easing scarcity and pulling prices back toward $1.

Conversely, if demand drops and prices fall to $0.70, farmers incur losses. They scale back with fewer hens and less feed, reducing supply until balance restores prices to $1. No central authority dictates quotas. The market self-regulates through incentives.

CAU operates identically. Miners produce tokens at a stable cost, but output scales with demand. Rising usage boosts rewards, drawing more miners and expanding supply to meet needs, which prevents fee spikes like Bitcoin’s. Falling demand reduces incentives, contracts supply, and stabilizes value without inflation. This equilibrium is designed to make CAU a competitive option for electronic cash use cases: predictable for users, profitable yet fair for miners, and immune to manipulation.

Hybrid features and advantages

Hybrid features amplify this dynamic. Validators stake 320 CAU for PoS governance, adding security layers, while a 1 CAU smart contract fee deters spam. Multi-algorithm support, including Bitcoin ASICs, ensures broad accessibility, and offline mining opens doors to underserved regions.

For miners, Canxium’s model seeks to reduce the volatility of mining rewards and promote decentralization among participants. Predictable costs mean sustainable operations that empower small-scale participants over corporate farms. Miners thrive on demand signals, not speculation.

For users, Canxium delivers real electronic cash. Low, stable fees enable seamless P2P transfers and DeFi without Bitcoin’s congestion or stablecoins’ censorship risks. CAU’s value, backed by verifiable work and market forces, offers a third way: mineable like BTC but adaptive like fiat, without the flaws.

Roadmap and ecosystem growth

The industry already feels the impact. Canxium exposes Bitcoin’s rigidity as outdated and stablecoins as counterfeit. By fostering organic growth, it resists pump-and-dump schemes and builds a resilient economy. Recent integrations, such as cross-mining with Kaspa and the upcoming Ravencoin hardfork, further unite PoW networks, while stable costs remain the differentiator.

As of September 2025, Canxium’s roadmap roars ahead. From the 2023 mainnet to ongoing enhancements, including defenses against rivals like Qubic via unified incentives, the project continues to advance. Community buzz on X highlights CAU’s edge with statements like: ‘No more volatile mining. CAU is the real deal for decentralized money.’

The dawn of true electronic cash

This is not evolution but revolution. Canxium is fighting crypto’s status quo and arms the masses with stable, demand-driven electronic cash. For traders spotting the next paradigm shift, miners seeking equity, and visionaries demanding purity, the call is clear. Canxium’s project seeks to contribute innovative solutions to the ongoing development of digital money.

Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
You wait all year for a quirky trolley game, then both The Trolley Solution and Troleu rock up in quick succession
Game Updates

You wait all year for a quirky trolley game, then both The Trolley Solution and Troleu rock up in quick succession

by admin


By the great transport gods, trolleymageddon is upon us! It’s the end of the line as we know it, and I feel fine. All of that is to say that two wacky trolley-related games are releasing within days of each other, no doubt driving fans of the budding genre off the rails or road.

The Trolley Solution, a game about a famous philosophical quandary and also at least one tale of a girl falling deeply in love with a tram, pulled up at this stop on September 12th. Boarding costs £5.20/$6.49/€6.33 right now, or £5.40 if you want the deluxe edition the comes with a mysterious and possibly satirical DLC dubbed ‘the V.I.P. lever’. If you hurry, you can probably still catch it! Troleu, a game that tasks you with checking tickets and occasionally kicking the bottoms of troublemakers as a trolleybus conductor, is due to pull up on the opposite side of the stop later today, September 15th. Make sure you’ve got your ticket ready!

If you opt to get on The Trolley Solution’s tram, which is named Trolley-San, you’re in for a series of amusing scenarios/puzzles based around Phillipa Foot’s famous trolley problem. You know, the one with the unstoppable train speeding towards a point at which some tracks separate, with some unfortunate folks strapped to the rails of both forks, and a lever presenting the chance to save one group at the expense of the other.

As I discovered when I gave its demo a go back in June, The Trolley Solution takes that scenario in a whole bunch of wacky directions, including one which politely requests permission to tweet something highly controversial about footwear from your Twitter account. That’s probably less of a threat if you’re solely on BlueSky or have smartly given up the socials. Also, this happens:

Tameko falls, to a degree of your choosing, in love with a tram. He goes by Trolley-San and keep pulling up and saying “Ding Ding” in what I can only assume by Tameko’s reactions to be an incredibly suave and seductive fashion. This and all the rest of the game – and I can’t emphasise this enough – are a right hoot, a great laugh, and a throaty chuckle.

Given the updated Steam page images feature the likes of a person pushing a tram up an incline like Sisyphus, I can only assume the full version’s even wackier.

Image credit: andrground

Troleu, meanwhile, is a bus conductor sim with attitude. Lest you accuse me of falsifying its trolleyness, the Steam description insists on a couple of occasions that this is a “trolleybus”. I’ve no idea what the difference between the two is, but our Nic liked the demo when he gave it a go back in June. That said, while he enjoyed lobbing folks with fake passes out of the doors “at which point they fly off down the street like a crisp packet in a gale”, he was neutral about the child kicking you can do if you wish. Here’s his conclusion:

To keep you on your toes, there’s both a passenger annoyance meter and your own boss, the ticket inspector, to contend with, who makes sure you haven’t been letting on fare dodgers. I am as yet not fully convinced there is more than 15 minutes of fun here but it is a very good 15 minutes.

Right, now pick your transport and get on. Or, divide yourself in two somehow and board both. Or board neither and stay home to play something else. The choice, as when dealing with tram quandaries and ornery passengers, is yours.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Binance's CZ Warns of Major Security Threat, Offers Big Solution
NFT Gaming

Binance’s CZ Warns of Major Security Threat, Offers Big Solution

by admin


  • Crucial warning from CZ
  • CZ says that crucial new Binance service “sucks”

Binance founder and its former CEO, Changpeng Zhao (widely known as CZ), has addressed the global crypto community with an important warning regarding the security of Web2 applications — even those that are considered to be secure ones.

CZ also offered a solution that he believes is likely to solve this problem.

You Might Also Like

Crucial warning from CZ

According to his tweet, CZ is certain that even the most secure open-source apps can be vulnerable to cyber threats: “Even open-source software is not safe these days.”

CZ reckons that Web3 is going to solve this problem and improve security for all Web2 software: “Web 3 will redefine security for Web 2.”

“We are still early,” Changpeng Zhao concluded his tweet. Web3 relates to the internet based on an extensive use of blockchain, smart contracts and crypto.

Even open-source software is not safe these days.

Web 3 will redefine security for Web 2.

We are still early.

— CZ 🔶 BNB (@cz_binance) September 8, 2025

CZ says that crucial new Binance service “sucks”

On Monday, CZ published a tweet in which he expressed his condolences because of the passing away of an important member of the Chinese crypto community. In relation to this, CZ mentioned the existence of a mechanism that allows the family of any diseased person to access his/her crypto stash on an exchange.

CZ announced that Binance has recently rolled out such a feature, and he has personally tested it. CZ says he did not like the way this mechanism works, but he is certain that it needs improvement.

RIP to a fellow cryptonian. 🙏

I hope he has setup a mechanisms for his loved ones to access his crypto.

Binance has released a related feature recently. I tried it. Direct feedback (as a user), it (the UX) sucks. Needs improving.

🙏 https://t.co/PksNt3iVEE

— CZ 🔶 BNB (@cz_binance) September 8, 2025

“Direct feedback (as a user), it (the UX) sucks. Needs improving,” he tweeted.





Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Site24x7 1
Product Reviews

I tested Site24x7, and found it a solid all-in-one IT monitoring solution

by admin



Why you can trust TechRadar


We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

Site24x7 is a cloud-based platform that delivers end-to-end network monitoring capabilities across websites, servers, networks, applications, and cloud infrastructure. As part of ManageEngine’s IT management suite and backed by Zoho’s development resources, Site24x7 has evolved into a mature platform that competes directly with industry leaders in our best network monitoring tools roundup.

TechRadar reviewers spend several weeks researching each major IT platform in the market, testing features, evaluating pricing structures, and assessing real-world performance across different use cases. While LogicMonitor remains our pick for the best network monitoring tool of 2025, Site24x7 presents a compelling alternative for organizations seeking comprehensive monitoring at more accessible price points.

Site24x7: Features

Site24x7 has an impressive feature set that positions it as a true all-in-one monitoring platform, well-suited for small to medium-sized businesses and managed service providers who need broad visibility without the complexity of enterprise-grade solutions. It provides out-of-the-box monitoring capabilities across diverse IT components, with users consistently praising its quick deployment and immediate value delivery.

While the feature execution is generally solid, some advanced reporting capabilities lag behind specialized competitors like New Relic or LogicMonitor. Pricing justification varies depending on which features you actually use up, though the flexible add-on structure does help optimize much of the costs.

Website and synthetic monitoring

Site24x7’s website monitoring capabilities include uptime tracking from over 130 global locations, synthetic transaction monitoring, and comprehensive performance metrics including web vitals and page load times. It offers both basic uptime checks and advanced synthetic transactions that can simulate complex user journeys, making it suitable for businesses that need to ensure consistent user experiences across different geographic regions.

Infrastructure and server monitoring

The platform provides robust server monitoring for Linux, Windows, macOS, and various Unix variants, with both agent-based and agentless monitoring options available. Infrastructure monitoring extends to containers, Kubernetes environments, databases, and virtualization platforms like VMware and Hyper-V, offering visibility into entire server ecosystems with customizable alerting thresholds.

Network monitoring and management

Site24x7’s network monitoring capabilities include SNMP-based device monitoring with support for over 11,000 device templates, network topology mapping, and traffic analysis through NetFlow, sFlow, and other flow protocols. The platform also offers network configuration management features to ensure compliance and security, making it particularly valuable for organizations with complex network infrastructures.

Application performance monitoring

The APM module supports multiple programming languages including Java, .NET, PHP, Node.js, Python, and Ruby, providing code-level insights, transaction tracing, and performance bottleneck identification. Integration with Real User Monitoring (RUM) allows teams to correlate synthetic monitoring data with actual user experiences, providing a complete picture of application performance.

Cloud and multi-platform monitoring

Site24x7 offers native monitoring integrations for AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform, with specialized dashboards for cloud-specific metrics and services. It includes cloud cost management features through its ManageEngine CloudSpend integration, helping organizations optimize cloud costs based on actual usage patterns and performance data.

(Image credit: Site24x7)

Site24x7: Ease of use

Site24x7 delivers a relatively straightforward onboarding experience that gets most users up and running within minutes, with agent installation and basic monitoring configuration requiring minimal technical expertise. The dashboard provides a unified view of all monitored components, though the interface design feels somewhat dated compared to newer monitoring solutions and can appear cluttered when managing large numbers of monitors.

Many users praise the quick alert setup and the platform’s ability to provide immediate value without extensive configuration, though some note that the learning curve becomes steeper when attempting to customize advanced features or create complex monitoring scenarios. Its design prioritizes functional completeness over modern design aesthetics, which can be both a strength and weakness depending on your preferences.

While power users appreciate the comprehensive feature access from the main interface, newer team members may find the abundance of options overwhelming initially. Site24x7’s strength lies in its practical approach to monitoring. Most essential features are accessible without deep technical knowledge, though users frequently need to contact support for advanced customizations.

Site24x7: Pricing

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Plan

Starting price (paid annually)

What’s included

Professional

$42/month

All-in-one monitoring support for 1 application, 5 servers, 20 websites, 4GB log ingestion, and 100K pageviews.

Enterprise

$625/month

Adds anomaly detection, event correlation, compliance features, and premium support.

Site24x7’s pricing structure is transparent and flexible, offering clear value propositions at each tier without hidden fees or per-user charges that plague many competitors. The entry-level pricing at $42/month makes it accessible to small businesses, while the scaling structure provides reasonable upgrade paths as monitoring needs grow.

However, organizations that need extensive synthetic monitoring or high-volume log management may find costs escalating quickly through add-on purchases. Plus the feature restrictions between tiers can feel limiting for teams with specific monitoring requirements that span multiple plan levels.

Site24x7: Customer support

Site24x7 provides tiered support based on subscription levels, with standard email support available for all paid plans and enhanced chat and phone support starting from the Pro tier. Most users generally report positive experiences with the support team’s technical knowledge and responsiveness, praising their ability to help with complex configuration scenarios and integration challenges.

The platform also maintains comprehensive documentation and video tutorials, though some users note that advanced configuration guidance could be more detailed. Support experience also varies significantly between plan tiers, with enterprise customers receiving dedicated support channels and faster response times. While basic queries are resolved promptly, users on lower-tier plans may experience longer response times for complex technical issues.

Site24x7: Alternatives

Site24x7 occupies a unique position in the monitoring market as an affordably-priced solution that competes effectively against both specialized tools and enterprise platforms. The platform is well-suited for small to medium-sized businesses, managed service providers, and organizations looking to consolidate multiple monitoring tools.

Its main competitors include New Relic for application monitoring, PRTG for network monitoring, and Datadog for comprehensive observability, though Site24x7’s pricing advantage becomes significant when comparing feature-equivalent configurations.

Site24x7 is a value-oriented alternative to premium solutions like LogicMonitor, New Relic, and Datadog, while offering more comprehensive features than budget alternatives like Nagios or Zabbix. Organizations choosing Site24x7 typically prioritize cost-effectiveness and breadth of monitoring capabilities over cutting-edge features or advanced analytics.

Site24x7: Final verdict

Site24x7 is an all-in-one monitoring solution that balances functionality with accessible pricing, making it attractive for organizations looking to simplify their monitoring stack. The platform’s strengths lie in its broad monitoring coverage, quick deployment, and cost-effective scaling, while its weaknesses center around interface design and customization options.

But for most small to medium-sized businesses and MSPs, these trade-offs are acceptable compromises for the significant cost savings and operational simplification. The platform earns a strong recommendation for organizations prioritizing practical monitoring coverage over cutting-edge features.

While enterprises with complex requirements or teams demanding the latest in AI-powered monitoring may find better fits elsewhere, Site24x7’s combination of functionality, reliability, and value makes it a compelling choice for the majority of IT teams seeking comprehensive monitoring capabilities without premium pricing.

FAQs

What types of infrastructure can Site24x7 monitor?

Site24x7 provides comprehensive monitoring across websites, servers (Linux, Windows, macOS, Unix variants), network devices, cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, GCP), applications, databases, containers, and virtualization environments. The platform supports both agent-based and agentless monitoring approaches, with over 11,000 device templates for network equipment and extensive integration capabilities for modern IT infrastructure components.

How does Site24x7’s pricing compare to competitors?

Site24x7 offers significantly more affordable pricing than premium competitors like New Relic, Datadog, or LogicMonitor, with plans starting at $9/month and no per-user fees. Its value proposition becomes particularly strong for organizations needing comprehensive monitoring across multiple infrastructure types, as competitors often require separate products or modules that increase total costs substantially.

What support options are available with Site24x7?

Support quality varies by plan tier, with email support for all paid customers and enhanced chat/phone support from the Pro plan onwards. Enterprise customers receive dedicated support channels and priority response times. But the platform provides documentation and video tutorials, though users frequently need direct support for advanced configurations.

Can Site24x7 replace multiple monitoring tools?

Yes, Site24x7’s comprehensive feature set is specifically designed to consolidate multiple monitoring tools into a single platform, covering website uptime, server performance, network monitoring, application performance, and cloud infrastructure. Many users successfully replace combinations of specialized tools with Site24x7, achieving both cost savings and operational simplification.

Is Site24x7 suitable for enterprise environments?

While Site24x7 can handle enterprise monitoring requirements, it’s best suited for small to medium-sized businesses and organizations prioritizing cost-effectiveness. Enterprises requiring sophisticated AI-driven analytics, extensive customization capabilities, or complex integration scenarios may find better fits with premium alternatives. Still, Site24x7’s Enterprise plan does provide enhanced capabilities for larger deployments

We’ve listed the best website defacement monitoring services.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Web3 compute has a trust issue, but the solution is obvious
GameFi Guides

Web3 compute has a trust issue, but the solution is obvious

by admin



Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

Web3 is powering a digital revolution that will bring untold benefits to organizations. Decentralization promises to tear down the monolithic structures that support the internet as it exists now, with major implications for finance, social media, and even the computing infrastructure that supports the digital economy. 

Summary

  • Decentralized compute holds huge promise — cheaper, censorship-resistant, and scalable for AI, while putting privacy and sovereignty back in users’ hands.
  • Unlike AWS or Google Cloud, decentralized networks lack enforceable SLAs or legal recourse, leaving users uncertain about reliability.
  • Centralization’s edge is accountability — cloud giants win today because they guarantee uptime, performance, and compensation when things go wrong.
  • Web3’s solution: validator audits — incentivized, community-run nodes continuously verify performance, reliability, and correctness of computations.
  • With transparent audits, staking incentives, and penalties for dishonesty, decentralized compute can rival — and even surpass — centralized providers.

The prospect of decentralized compute has many eager with anticipation, because it can bring incredible cost benefits by utilizing idle computing resources while preventing censorship. More than that, it can provide enhanced scalability for artificial intelligence workloads, and it supports ideals around privacy and sovereignty, giving users full control over their data. 

But there’s one outstanding challenge we must overcome before we can fulfill this decentralized dream — namely, the need to establish trust in decentralized compute. The question is, how can this be done without the assurances provided by cloud computing giants such as Amazon Web Services or Google Cloud? 

Those legacy cloud computing giants dominate the compute industry, even while charging exorbitant prices for their services and having questionable track records in terms of data privacy, simply because of the trust they command. By offering service level agreements within a clear, hierarchical structure, users are assured that they’re getting the reliable, scalable compute they need to power their applications. If you pay for premium uptime, guaranteed performance, and dedicated support, you know that if they don’t deliver it, you’ll have legal recourse. 

Today’s cloud giants operate in a framework that enables contracts to be enforced. Users know that downtime is an anomaly, and on the rare occasions when it happens, they’ll be compensated for the problems caused. And if that compensation isn’t forthcoming, they have clear avenues to seek recompense. This is why centralization is so powerful. Despite its limitations, it provides strong assurances and accountability, which means protection for users.

Trust is critical

As the crypto industry pushes the shift to web3 infrastructures and decentralized compute, this centralized model of trust doesn’t apply. After all, web3 seeks to kill these intermediates and single points of failure, and redistribute power equally among its users, and that means there’s no obvious recourse in the event that problems occur. Although it’s an immensely exciting shift, it leads to questions about how trust can be enforced. If web3 cannot establish trust, it’s unlikely to be able to displace centralized providers in an industry as critical as cloud-based compute.  

Instead of one massive data center operated by a rich and powerful corporation, decentralized networks have thousands, if not millions, of individual nodes, each contributing a little bit of power to the network. By combining these resources, it’s possible to make immense computing resources available to those who need them at lower costs, but those users require assurances, too. 

For instance, a cash-strapped AI startup seeking a cluster of powerful GPUs is likely to find the idea of an affordable decentralized compute network appealing, but how can it know for sure that the resources it’s paying for are reliable? How can it verify their computations? In a network where anyone can contribute resources, how can it identify which nodes are reliable and trustworthy, and which ones might be slow and potentially even malicious? 

The web2 model, based on enforceable SLAs and brand recognition, simply doesn’t apply to decentralized networks. In fact, the very idea is anathema to web3, because if you had a single entity that’s able to enforce whatever guarantees are made, that means having to accept the lack of privacy and the potential for censorship it promises to eradicate. 

The issue of trust is a critical one that must be solved; otherwise, decentralized compute’s growth will be handicapped by a lack of confidence. An application that has millions of users globally needs to know it can rely on its underlying servers, and if web3 can’t offer any assurances, it will have little choice but to rely on centralized infrastructure providers due to the strong guarantees they provide, even if their model undermines its own, decentralized principles. 

Building community trust with incentives

Fortunately, web3 offers an elegant solution that aligns with its core ethos. The answer is to engineer trust through a system of decentralized audits by incentivized, community-run validator nodes. 

So instead of having compute nodes that are vouched for by an organization like AWS, which can be sued if it breaks its promises, web3 must instead rely on the collective intelligence and vigilance of hundreds of network participants, rewarding them for their honesty and penalizing them for not telling the truth. 

The individual validators, of which there could be thousands, can be incentivized to act honestly via reward-based staking mechanisms. This will encourage them to accurately assess and verify the performance and reliability of each node. Collectively, these validators will monitor the entire network of compute providers, auditing them on a continuous basis. Their job will be to verify the correctness of their computations, measure their performance, latency, and uptime, and identify any nodes engaged in malicious behavior. Users will then be able to look at the overall consensus, and in this way, the validators generate trust in the network. 

To encourage positive behavior, a “carrot-and-stick” approach is used. Should any compute node fail to meet the expected level of performance or attempt any funny business, it would be quickly identified by validators and penalized, taking away any incentives it may have. Meanwhile, the best-performing nodes will be rewarded, enhancing their reputations and attracting more demand for the services they provide. Moreover, the validators themselves will be penalized or rewarded, based on their honesty. 

Anyone who knows anything about crypto will immediately recognize the validity of this model, for it’s already used in countless proof-of-stake blockchains, where validator nodes work together to verify transactions. With decentralized compute, these validators will instead verify computations, creating a transparent and tamper-proof system of trust that’s every bit as reliable as the SLAs offered by AWS. 

A superior trust foundation

Decentralized audits by validator nodes align perfectly with the web3 model. It’s a permissionless model, and just as everyone can provide compute to the network, anyone can become a validator, meaning it’s fair to every participant. Moreover, the audits are completely transparent, with their processes and results published on the blockchain for anyone to verify. 

The design of such a system means it’s in the best interests of every validator to act honestly, as they’re incentivized to maintain a reputation for honesty, lest they lose their rewards and forfeit their stake. 

Building such a framework is challenging, no doubt, with the need for robust verification algorithms, easy-to-understand trust profiles, and simple requirements for users to become validators and join in the process. But once these frameworks are up and running, decentralized compute networks will be able to offer a superior foundation of trust and move beyond the limitations of today’s centralized cloud providers. 

Prashant Maurya

Prashant Maurya is the co-founder and CEO at Spheron Network, building the world’s largest community-powered compute stack for AI, web3, and agentic apps. Leading Spheron, Prashant has driven product strategy, team growth, and operations, enabling the platform to achieve real products, customers, and revenue. Today, the network boasts over 44,000 nodes across over 170 geos, with over $100 million in distributed compute, and is growing fast. Prior to founding Spheron, Prashant worked as a full-stack developer at Quaero and participated in Algorand’s mentorship program, where he produced work on blockchain-based decentralized maps. His expertise includes product management, product marketing, and investment strategies, all aimed at fostering innovation in the decentralized space.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Razer and Side launch large-scale playtesting solution that could reduce costs by 80%
Esports

Razer and Side launch large-scale playtesting solution that could reduce costs by 80%

by admin


Video game services provider Side and technology and hardware firm Razer have teamed up to launch a playtesting solution that can scale to more than 100,000 players.

Dubbed ‘Razer Cortex: Playtest Program – Powered by Side’, the new technology sits within the Razer Cortex launcher, which provides access to games from different platforms like Steam and the Epic Games Store, as well as offering functionality such as video capture.

By clicking on the ‘Playtest’ tab within Cortex, users can now become playtesters for various games. To sign up, players have to agree to a set of binding NDAs, then they are allowed access to a build of a work in progress title.

Cortex tracks playtime and performance data, and players can submit reports that log the things they like and dislike about the game, as well as reporting bugs.

Players are incentivized to sign up to the playtesting program by receiving Razer Silver for completing set playtime milestones. These credits can then be exchanged for rewards such as headphones.

Cortex has more than 50 million users worldwide, meaning game developers can potentially tap into an enormous group of playtesters across various countries and demographics.

At Gamescom, GamesIndustry.biz caught up with Harlan Beverly, chief technology officer of Side, to find out more about the new system.

“We’re changing the paradigm of playtesting,” he says.

Historically, playtesting meant “you hired 10 or 20 gamers, and you videoed them playing the game, and you interviewed them,” he explains.

“But with 50 million gamers willing to sign NDAs and go through the hoops of security, we can now do massive-scale pre-alpha play testing, which has never been possible before.”

The key aspect is that in addition to enabling enormous playtesting cohorts, the system uses AI to automatically process and provide insights into the huge volumes of data that are generated.

“The hardest thing about doing something like this is you get 100,000 players all giving feedback at the same time,” says Beverly. But the AI can quickly sift through all of that data and pick out key trends.

It produces a spreadsheet that, in addition to listing all of the scores and comments from anonymised users, provides a summary of what players think and what aspects they would like to see improved.

“If you get caught leaking stuff, then you’re going to lose your Razer Silver and Razer account”

Harlan Beverly, Side

“One of the coolest [pieces of] AI tech that’s behind the scenes here is we are de-duplicating the bugs,” adds Beverly.

So rather than listing 100,000 instances of the same bug, the system can recognise when an identical bug is being reported, even if the language used to report it differs, then list it as a single bug.

The system can also automatically generate Jira tickets for each bug.

But what about worries that leaks could result from providing access to an unreleased and potentially unannounced game to thousands of people?

Beverly says there are strong deterrents for leakers in the NDAs. “If you get caught leaking stuff, then you’re going to lose your Razer Silver and Razer account,” he says.

In addition, he notes that companies can choose to limit the size of the playtesting cohort and add eligibility criteria that, for example, would only allow access for highly trusted players.

The big advantage of the Playtest Program is that not only can it offer scale, it’s also potentially much cheaper than manually gathering playtesters together, notes Beverly.

He says the company estimates that the system could generate savings of up to 80% versus bringing in playtesters on an hourly rate.

Eric Vezzoli, director of technology at Razer, is bullish about the system’s prospects. “We think it should be a game changer,” he says.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Close