Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

social

Decrypt logo
GameFi Guides

Remilia Launching Milady Social Media Network to Serve ‘4chan Diaspora’

by admin September 20, 2025



In brief

  • Remilia Corporation is launching a Milady-centric social network called RemiliaChat.
  • The rollout is beginning with RemiliaNET, a social identity layer launching Friday.
  • While aimed at fans of 4chan, RemiliaChat will have some level of content moderation.

The Milady gang thinks social media is broken, calling the community of fans the “diaspora of chan culture”—such as the notoriously edgy 4chan. To fix that, the NFT project’s creators are launching a social media network to rival X, with the first step coming via official Milady profiles.

RemiliaNET is an in-browser experience that will allow the community to track their Milady achievements and build up a “social credit score,” with a competitive leaderboard to boot. And the upcoming RemiliaChat, with no release date confirmed, looks to be a fully fledged social media platform with an algorithm-driven feed and chat function.

“Remilia’s goal has never been just to dominate crypto and NFTs. We plan to save the entire culture of the internet, and the world through it, in the same way we did for crypto. RemiliaChat is how we achieve this,” Remilia Corporation Chief of Staff Michael Dragovic told Decrypt. “RemiliaNET is the identity service layer of Remilia Chat. We’re launching it now prior to releasing full social features to begin the onboarding process.”

Two weeks ago, a mysterious countdown started on the Milady Cult website, sending its community into a frenzy of theories and self-referential memes—the latest being, “What did CULT mean by this?” As it ticked down to zero, an additional eight days were added to the clock in the wake of last week’s assassination of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.

RemiliaNET profiles. Image: Remilia Corporation

On Friday, the clock finally finished, and it was revealed that what CULT meant was that RemiliaNET is now open for business.

Users of RemiliaNET will have the option of using one of the default Kagami-style profile pictures, or connecting their wallet to use an NFT profile picture from a wide array of Remilia and derivative collections—including Radbro, Aura, and Schizposters.

Most importantly, though, the platform will become the go-to spot for the Milady community to track their achievements, which translates to a “social credit score” used to place everyone upon a global leaderboard.

Achievements can already be unlocked via the Remilia Achievement Score page. Some of these can be collected by minting specific NFTs, playing on the Miladycraft Minecraft server, or participating in one of the project’s many alternate reality games.

The new system, Remilia Corporation says, however, will be much more seamless. Plus, the number of achievements is also set to expand with the launch of the site, with notifications prompting users when a new achievement is available.

In doing this, Dragovic—better known as Scorched Earth Policy—confirmed to Decrypt that RemiliaNET will act as a platform for users to “actively and knowingly” participate in “manipulation rounds.” This refers to periods where Milady’s CULT token is airdropped to users based on their achievements and rankings, although Dragovic added that rewards will not be limited to CULT tokens.

“RemiliaNET assigns a public ‘social credit score’ to every user that serves as multifactor sybil detection as well as cross-platform scoring, which will result in hidden incentive rewards,” Dragovic told Decrypt. “[It] will extend beyond direct token allocation into a general rewards ecosystem. These will be used to encourage user behaviors that maximize quality contribution and community distribution.”

Why RemiliaChat?

Friday’s launch of RemiliaNET is just the first step towards the creation of RemiliaChat, an ambitious Milady-infused attempt to disrupt the social media status quo. Remilia Corporation leader Charlotte Fang has been preparing the cult for this moment for years, forcing the core team to flicker through different platforms for communication.

“We’ve experimented with dozens of platforms in the past five years alone,” Dragovic said. “We’re definitely veterans of the internet, and we have quite a bit of experience with understanding what makes a platform work and what keeps that fire alive.”



As such, Dragovic said, the team has learned lessons from what they see as the downfall of Reddit, Discord, Twitter, and chan culture, especially 4chan. RemiliaChat will attempt to build on those failings to build a social media platform with a content feed, chat, and profiles. Specifically, RemiliaChat will look to reduce the pertinence of “slop” content via a custom algorithm, and emphasize anonymity and pseudonymity. 

It’s not just the team leading the Milady-sphere that is deeply rooted in internet culture; the entire community is a product of obsession with online spaces and disillusionment with the perceived degradation of society. 

“Remilia has been very much a product of the diaspora of chan culture,” Dragovic told Decrypt. “People are yearning for a new platform and a new space. RemeliaChat wants to be that. It wants to be the place where people go. It’s going to be one of the first and only platforms that’s designed around really hard online discourse principles.”

With a core community entrenched in online culture and a team dedicated to critiquing it, RemiliaChat hopes to become a new cultural hub for the cultivation of radical thought.

“Society’s most important discourse always occurs in iconic gathering places,” Dragovic said. “These places were our tribal campfires, our Athenian forums, our zones of intellectual exchange. And within them, always a core group of people coming together to develop the ideas of their time.”

“Our pivotal places now happen online,” he added. “Our iconic minds are anonymous posters.”

A free-for-all?

Milady, Remilia, and its surrounding communities have become a melting pot of ideas branching to the far corners of all wings of the political spectrum. However, many outsiders would likely characterize the group as far-right, with its tendencies to echo racist and other controversial sentiments.

In part, however, the group’s flirtation with fringe theories comes as part of Fang’s concept of “pre-cancelling” yourself. This has led to members leaning into shock humor or intentionally saying slurs under the intention of appearing punk, despite not necessarily agreeing with their own take.

As a result of this ethos, moderation on traditional social media platforms has become a problem for the community. RemiliaChat, to the dismay of its community, cannot be completely unmoderated as the spread of illegal and unethical content, such as child sexual abuse materials, may occur.

Remilia Corporation confirmed to Decrypt that it will have a moderation system in place, and claims to have been learning lessons on how to handle it through its previous projects.

“Our intention is to do as little moderation as possible in terms of content,” Dragovic told Decrypt. “Our belief is that 90% of moderation comes from the way you design the layout of your site. The site should itself steer the user into posting a certain way and creating a certain form of engagement.”

“We’ll intervene on the absolutely necessary parts,” he added, “like bad actors, illegal shit, and things that could get the FBI knocking on our door.”

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

September 20, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Are Billionaires Destroying Social Media? Ethereum's Buterin Weighs In
GameFi Guides

Are Billionaires Destroying Social Media? Ethereum’s Buterin Weighs In

by admin September 15, 2025


  • Good old days?
  • Anti-capitalist or elitism? 

The increasing toxicity of social media is a hot-button issue, and some believe that billionaires are to blame for this. 

Ethereum’s Vitalik Buterin recently weighed in on the matter, explaining that Web 1.0, which is generally considered to be the very first stage of the World Wide Web, was considered to be a much more unbridled source of good. 

Good old days?

Despite the fact that the technology was quite underwhelming with static websites and minimal interactivity, some still feel nostalgic about this era due to its grassroots spirit since Silicon Valley was yet to seize control, and the online experience was not shaped by tech behemoths such as Facebook, Amazon, and Google. 

You Might Also Like

Plus, the audience is less selective since content is now being explicitly pushed at consumers instead of being sought out. In the early days, for instance, users had to look for a specific internet forum that matched their interests.

Anti-capitalist or elitism? 

With Web 1, there was little pressure for websites to be profitable as opposed to Web 2 platforms that prioritize strong capital optimization. 

Hence, if one adopts an anti-capitalist view, the current toxicity of social media essentially boils down to the flawed incentive structure.

At the same time, as Buterin argues, the problem with the current state of the internet is that it is meant to appeal to the average Joe with shallow and often reactive content that is mainly comprised of memes and soundbites. For comparison, Web 1 was mainly being created by well-informed “right-curve” users. 

The Ethereum co-founder also believes that this could be due to “some mix” of both of these factors. 



Source link

September 15, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Trump Media Links Truth Social Gems to Crypto.com’s Cronos
Crypto Trends

Trump Media Links Truth Social Gems to Crypto.com’s Cronos

by admin September 9, 2025



Trump Media and Technology Group has updated its Truth Social platform to connect its digital rewards program with cryptocurrency.

The company announced on Tuesday that Truth Social users subscribed to its Patriot Package, a paid version of its Truth+ streaming platform, will gain access to premium features like the “Truth gems,” as part of its upgraded rewards program. 

The gems can be earned through activities across Trump Media’s platforms and converted into Cronos (CRO), the native token of Crypto.com, using the exchange’s wallet infrastructure.

Cointelegraph reached out to Crypto.com for more information, but did not receive a response by publication. 

Trump Media takes a different approach to Truth Social rewards

The move to integrate CRO signals a pivot from the company’s earlier remarks about exploring the launch of its own utility token. 

In April, Trump Media said it was exploring the launch of a proprietary token and digital wallet to support its Truth+ streaming platform. In an April 29 letter to shareholders, Trump Media CEO Devin Nunes said the company is exploring the introduction of a utility token within a Truth digital wallet.  

Nunes said the token can initially be used to pay for subscription costs and be applied to other products within the ecosystem. He added that the token will also be part of a rewards program that Trump Media is exploring across services. 

In May, rumors of a Truth Social memecoin launching circulated on social media. However, Truth Social denied that it was planning to launch a memecoin. Donald Trump Jr., the US president’s eldest son, said that there was “no truth” to the rumors. 

Related: Trump family’s wealth grew by $1.3B following ABTC and WLFI debuts: Report

Trump Media and Crypto.com’s relationship 

This is not the first time that Trump Media has collaborated with Crypto.com. Earlier this year, the company partnered with the platform to launch exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tracking digital assets and securities “with a Made in America focus.” 

The funds will launch through Truth.Fi and will be available through Crypto.com’s broker-dealer, Foris Capital. The ETFs are expected to go live later in 2025, subject to regulatory approvals. 

Trump Media has also entered a major agreement with Crypto.com to acquire 684.4 million CRO tokens, worth roughly $105 million, as part of a broader $6.4 billion digital-asset treasury strategy. The tokens will be acquired through a mix of stock and cash and held in Crypto.com’s institutional custody, potentially allowing Trump Media to stake them for additional yield.

Magazine: ‘Accidental jailbreaks’ and ChatGPT’s links to murder, suicide: AI Eye



Source link

September 9, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Kai Cenat and Corey2U side by side looking at camera
Esports

Kai Cenat addresses plans to build a school in Nigeria amid social media frenzy

by admin September 2, 2025



Kai Cenat halted Mafiathon 3 right out of the gate in order to address his plans of building a school in Nigeria. This update comes after weeks of fans pestering the social media celeb online.

Back in March 2024, Twitch superstar Kai Cenat visited Nigeria. While there, he was taken to a local school. After seeing the state of the building, with hundreds of students crammed into a single classroom, he pledged to help them however he could.

Article continues after ad

“Whatever they tell me you guys need, we’re gonna make sure you guys have [it],” he said at the time. Upon returning to America, he then doubled down and announced plans to build an entirely new school in Nigeria.

In the year and a half since, fans of the streamer have begun to question the charitable cause. With on-stream updates few and far between, and further donations piling up, it’s become a point of contention, with viewers hounding Cenat for information at every turn.

Article continues after ad

Article continues after ad

Now, he’s delivered. At the very beginning of Mafiathon 3, what’s intended to be a record-breaking Twitch stream, he paused the celeb-filled broadcast to address the situation and clarify progress being made.

Twitch: Kai CenatThe main reason construction hasn’t begun yet is due to complications with the land in Makoko.

Kai Cenat clarifies the status of new school in Nigeria

Two representatives working with Cenat on the project flew in from South Africa and Nigeria, Fanny Moral and Chinedum Umeche respectively, to help provide an update. These partners are from Banwo & Ighodalo, along with Enko Education.

Crucially, the group stressed how “it’s impossible” to build a new school from the ground up in under two years. At least, that’s if they want it done right. Ultimately, they want this school “to last for a long time,” as Cenat stressed. “Beyond me, beyond streaming.”

Article continues after ad

“From land purchase and approvals to construction, staffing, and curriculum,” there’s a great deal involved, as an accompanying slideshow conveyed.

The first factor listed there has been the main reason for delays, they explained, as due to the “topography, it’s difficult to build a school in that community.”

Article continues after ad

Specifically, Cenat visited Makoko, which has been described as the “Venice of Africa,” due to its position amid streams of open water. As such, the team has decided to move the project to Yaba, Lagos, which is located “next to Makoko.”

Article continues after ad

When established, students from Makoko will still receive free education, while students travelling from other areas will pay.

Kai Cenat brought officials from Nigeria and South Africa to explain why the school hasn’t been built yet 👀

The Reasons:
– Finding Land
– Buy the Land
– Authorization from the Government
– Build the School
– Hiring Employees
– Gaining Accreditation pic.twitter.com/bXrcxo6932

— ryan 🤿 (@scubaryan_) September 2, 2025

As part of the Mafiathon 3 stream, Cenat announced that 15% of revenue from the broadcast will again be helping build the school in Nigeria. If he achieves his plan of reaching 1 million Twitch subscribers, that will provide roughly $750,000 USD for the project, without factoring in higher-tier subs.

To continue providing full transparency moving forward, the group has established the Kai Cenat Foundation Inc. This is a public charity, which ensures all funds are accounted for and that no individual involved can personally profit. We’ve all seen how it’s worked out in the past for those who haven’t disclosed where charity money is going.

Article continues after ad

Article continues after ad

Today, the account has a balance of $1,134,453 USD. Cenat himself personally donated $128,579 USD in order to supply the current school with computers while the project gets underway.

Twitch: Kai CenatCenat revealed how funds are being spent through his charity.

All up, the charity is seeking $5 million in total investment to “get us to the first day of class,” Cenat explained. “That’s what we’re aiming for.”





Source link

September 2, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
DOGE Put Everyone’s Social Security Data at Risk, Whistleblower Claims
Product Reviews

DOGE Put Everyone’s Social Security Data at Risk, Whistleblower Claims

by admin September 2, 2025


As students returned to school this week, WIRED spoke to a self-proclaimed leader of a violent online group known as “Purgatory” about a rash of swattings at universities across the US in recent days. The group claims to have ties to the loose cybercriminal network known as The Com, and the alleged Purgatory leader claimed responsibility for calling in hoax active-shooter alerts.

Researchers from multiple organizations warned this week that cybercriminals are increasingly using generative AI tools to fuel ransomware attacks, including real situations where cybercriminals without technical expertise are using AI to develop the malware. And a popular, yet enigmatic, shortwave Russian radio station known as UVB-76 seems to have turned into a tool for Kremlin propaganda after decades of mystery and intrigue.

But wait, there’s more! Each week, we round up the security and privacy news we didn’t cover in depth ourselves. Click the headlines to read the full stories. And stay safe out there.

Since it was first created, critics have warned that the young and inexperienced engineers in Elon Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) were trampling over security and privacy rules in their seemingly reckless handling of US government data. Now a whistleblower claims that DOGE staff put one massive dataset at risk of hacking or leaking: a database containing troves of personal data about US residents, including virtually every American’s Social Security number.

The complaint from Social Security Administration chief data officer Charles Borges, filed with the Office of the Special Counsel and reviewed by The New York Times, states that DOGE affiliates explicitly overruled security and privacy concerns to upload the SSA database to a cloud server that lacked sufficient security monitoring, “potentially violating multiple federal statutes” in its allegedly reckless handling of the data. Internal DOGE and SSA communications reviewed by the Times shows officials waving off concerns about the data’s lack of sanitization or anonymization before it was uploaded to the server, despite concerns from SSA officials about the lack of security of that data transfer.

Borges didn’t allege that the data was actually breached or leaked, but Borges emphasized the vulnerability of the data and the immense cost if it were compromised. “Should bad actors gain access to this cloud environment, Americans may be susceptible to widespread identity theft, may lose vital health care and food benefits, and the government may be responsible for reissuing every American a new Social Security number at great cost,” Borges wrote.

Nearly 10 months have passed since the revelation that China’s cyberespionage group known as Salt Typhoon had penetrated US telecoms, spying on Americans’ calls and texts. Now the FBI is warning that the net cast by those hackers may have been far broader than even previously thought, encompassing potential victims in 80 countries. The bureau’s top cyber official, Brett Leatherman, told The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post that the hackers had shown interest in at least 600 companies, which the FBI notified, though it’s not clear how many of those possible targets the hackers breached or what level of access they achieved. “That global indiscriminate targeting really is something that is outside the norms of cyberspace operations,” Leatherman told the Journal. The FBI says that Salt Typhoon’s telecom hacking alone resulted in the spies gaining access to at least a million call records and targeted the calls and texts of more than a hundred Americans.

Days after Donald Trump’s Alaska summit with Vladimir Putin, the White House moved to gut its own intelligence ranks. A senior CIA Russia analyst—29 years in service and slated for a coveted overseas post—was abruptly stripped of her clearance, The Washington Post reported. She was one of 37 officials forced out under an August 19 memo from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. The order listed no infractions. To colleagues, it looked like a loyalty purge. The firings have reportedly unsettled the CIA’s rank and file, sending a message that survival depends on hewing intelligence to fit the president’s views.

On Monday, Gabbard unveiled what she calls “ODNI 2.0,” a restructuring that cuts more than 500 positions and shutters or folds whole offices she deems redundant. The Foreign Malign Influence Center and the Cyber Threat Intelligence Integration Center are being pared back, while the National Intelligence University will be absorbed into the Pentagon’s defense school. Gabbard says the plan will save $700 million a year and depoliticize intelligence. Critics noted, however, a fact sheet published by Gabbard on Monday itemized only a fraction of those savings, and tjeu warned that the overhaul could hollow out the very coordination ODNI was created post-9/11 to provide—discarding expertise and leaving the intelligence fragmented at a time of escalating threats.



Source link

September 2, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
DAAPrivacyRightIcon
Product Reviews

Chinese social media platforms roll out labels for AI-generated material

by admin September 2, 2025


Major social media platforms in China have started rolling out labels for AI-generated content to comply with a law that took effect on Monday. Users of the likes of WeChat, Douyin, Weibo and RedNote (aka Xiaohongshu) are now seeing such labels on posts. These denote the use of generative AI in text, images, audio, video and other types of material, according to the South China Morning Post. Identifiers such as watermarks have to be included in metadata too.

WeChat has told users they must proactively apply labels to their AI-generated content. They’re also prohibited from removing, tampering with or hiding any AI labels that WeChat applies itself, or to use “AI to produce or spread false information, infringing content or any illegal activities.”

ByteDance’s Douyin — the Chinese version of TikTok — similarly urged users to apply a label to every post of theirs that includes AI-generated material while noting it’s able to use metadata to detect where a piece of content content came from. Weibo, meanwhile, has added the option for users to report “unlabelled AI content” option when they see something that should have such a label.

Four agencies drafted the law — which was issued earlier this year — including the main internet regulator, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC). The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security and the National Radio and Television Administration also helped put together the legislation, which is being enforced to help oversee the tidal wave of genAI content. In April, the CAC started a three-month campaign to regulate AI apps and services.

Mandatory labels for AI content could help folks better understand when they’re seeing AI slop and/or misinformation instead of something authentic. Some US companies that provide genAI tools offer similar labels and are starting to bake such identifiers into hardware. Google’s Pixel 10 devices are the first phones that implement C2PA (Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity) content credentials right inside the camera app.



Source link

September 2, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
How Social Engineering Fooled A Millionaire Out Of $1.2M In Crypto
GameFi Guides

How Social Engineering Fooled a Millionaire Out of $1.2M in Crypto

by admin August 31, 2025



In crypto, the most dangerous scams don’t always hide in code. They hide in trust. Swedish entrepreneur Erik Bergman, Founder of Great.com, learned this lesson in the most brutal way possible. 

In a gripping thread on X, he revealed how fraudsters manipulated him into giving away $1.25 million. This was not done through a hack, but via a carefully staged play on human trust, featuring the biggest names in online culture.

The Trap: Belonging Before Betrayal

The story begins with a call that seemed impossible to refuse. Bergman was approached for a virtual meeting on a water project, featuring none other than YouTube stars MrBeast and Mark Rober. The project was to build wells in Africa and aid people in getting access to clean water. 

Both YouTubers have built reputations on philanthropy and bold charitable campaigns. So for Bergman, who has committed much of his own wealth to social impact causes, the meeting felt like a natural fit.

I just got scammed for $1.25 million.

I feel ashamed and stupid.

This story starts with me getting a phone call from @MrBeast and @MarkRober .

They ask me to donate money @teamwater. To build wells in Africa and help people get clean water.

I’m surprised by their call. We’ve… pic.twitter.com/ZQkTSovtqz

— Erik Bergman (@smilingerik) August 29, 2025

“It started with MrBeast and Mark Rober on a call about water,” Bergman wrote. The presence of these names disarmed him immediately. He was convinced he was stepping into a legitimate circle of philanthropists.

But the call was only the first step in an elaborate social engineering scheme. Soon after, Bergman was added to what looked like an exclusive donor group on WhatsApp. Inside this digital circle, he saw names like Adin Ross, Eddie (the Co-Founder of Stake), Shopify’s Tobi Lütke, and even a Norwegian billionaire. The design was intentional: to make him feel like part of a rarefied community of wealthy do-gooders.

From there, the trust gap only widened. A “Coinbase representative” appeared in the group, offering members early access to a new token. The opportunity was presented as insider access to a major exchange rollout, exactly the kind of exclusive deal one might expect among big-ticket philanthropists. 

Bergman, already softened by the names around him, didn’t really question the offer and transferred nearly $1 million.

The money was gone in minutes.

A Scam Built on Belonging

What happened to Bergman is a clear case of social engineering in crypto. This was not a hack of codes or systems. It was a hack of trust. The scammers built an environment where he believed he was among people like him. Once that sense of belonging was created, his skepticism faded. That is when the fraudsters struck.

Bergman himself admitted this vulnerability. He said he had always thought of himself as “too smart” to fall for a scam. But intelligence wasn’t the deciding factor. The fraudsters weren’t testing his knowledge of blockchains; they were testing his capacity for trust.

“I was vulnerable because I wanted to be part of the group,” he confessed in his thread.

This is the uncomfortable truth of such scams: they don’t work because people are uninformed. They work because people are human.

The First Transaction

At first, the buy-in looked small compared to what was promised. Bergman sent $500,000 in crypto to what he believed was an official wallet. The chat, filled with supposed billionaires and creators, lit up with excitement. 

Even when one “billionaire” appeared to be rejected for being late, Bergman felt reassured. If they could reject someone of that stature, surely the process was genuine.

The following day, the scammers raised the stakes. The price of the coin had doubled, and the maximum buy-in was now $750,000. Eager not to be left out, Bergman wired the amount without hesitation. That brought his total loss to $1.25 million in just 48 hours.

Raising the Stakes

By the third day, the pitch escalated again. The price had climbed to $0.45 per coin, and Bergman got prepared to invest once more. But this time, something made him pause. Looking closer, he spotted inconsistencies: a supposed American influencer using a UK number, details that did not add up. When he finally called the real MrBeast, also known as Jimmy, the truth hit him with devastating clarity.

Everything was fake. The WhatsApp group, the banter, the plans of a trip to Africa, even the Coinbase tie-up. In all, Bergman had lost $1.25 million across three staged investment rounds and had narrowly avoided sending even more.

Not the First, Not the Last

Bergman’s ordeal may sound extraordinary, but social engineering has quietly siphoned billions from the crypto economy. It is one of many striking cases that show just how devastating and varied these attacks can be.

In 2022, the Ronin Network, which powers the play-to-earn game Axie Infinity, suffered one of the largest breaches in crypto history. Hackers didn’t storm its systems; instead, they tricked employees into downloading a fake PDF job offer, which gave attackers control of the network. The result? More than $600 million was stolen, and the exploit wasn’t discovered for nearly a week!

In 2024, DMM Bitcoin, a Japanese exchange, lost over $300 million in what investigators say was most likely a social engineering attack. Though details remain under wraps, early findings suggest attackers infiltrated through stolen operator credentials rather than direct technical flaws.

Both cases underline what Bergman’s story makes painfully clear: the weakest link in crypto is rarely the blockchain itself. It’s the person holding the keys.

Erik’s Brother Steps In

The aftermath of Bergman’s revelation carried a layer of humanity. His brother, who works alongside him, stepped in with a sober response to the flood of sympathy and criticism the X posts received.

Here’s what my brother wrote. Translated by almighty GPT.

“Little brother, this fucking sucks!
BUT, one of your admirable qualities is your positive view of people. Your starting point is that the world is a good place. With that mindset, sometimes you take a hit. The…

— Erik Bergman (@smilingerik) August 29, 2025

“My brother is brave for sharing this,” he wrote. But he also cautioned followers not to romanticize the story. Scammers hadn’t just stolen money; they had shaken Bergman’s sense of judgment, self-image, and trust in himself.

That distinction mattered. Losing money is devastating, but in Bergman’s case, it wasn’t the millions alone that cut deepest. It was the humiliation of realizing he had been fooled despite thinking he was immune.

A Warning Wrapped in a Confession

By making his experience public, Bergman did more than tell a personal story. He issued a warning to the wider crypto community, especially those who assume they are too sophisticated to fall victim. The most sophisticated scams are tailored to exactly that confidence.

The choice of MrBeast and Mark Rober was deliberate. The scammers understood which names carried Bergman’s trust. By invoking figures known for generosity and credibility, they created an aura of legitimacy. 

The scheme was carefully constructed: a supposed Coinbase representative, the promise of an insider token, and a network of alleged philanthropists. None of it existed. Every element was crafted to exploit his trust rather than breach technology.

Bergman’s experience is also a cautionary tale for influencers, creators, and institutions whose reputations hold influence online. When scammers misuse those identities, the harm extends far beyond financial loss. It weakens public confidence in communities that are built on trust.

Social Engineering: A Growing Threat

Social engineering is not a new tactic, but in the world of crypto it is becoming more widespread. Chainalysis estimates that scammers stole more than $1.7 billion in 2023, with a large part of that linked to social engineering. 

Its real danger is in how flexible it is. Criminals do not need to attack the blockchain itself when they can attack something more fragile: human trust.

Experts have warned that as crypto adoption widens, these scams will only evolve. From fake customer support chats to fraudulent airdrops, from compromised Discord servers to deepfake calls, the toolbox is growing. Bergman’s story may look unusual, but the mechanics, impersonation, trust, and exclusivity are already common across the industry.

Lessons in Trust

For Bergman, the $1.25 million loss is now public record. He chose transparency, despite the personal cost of embarrassment, in hopes others might avoid the same fate. His candor has turned his misfortune into a cautionary tale, one that should echo far beyond crypto circles.

The broader lesson? In a world obsessed with decentralization and code, trust remains the most fragile currency of all. And when it breaks, the damage spreads further than any ledger can show.

As Bergman himself admitted, “I thought I was too smart to be scammed.” His story proves no one is.

Also Read: Crypto Investor Loses 783 Bitcoin ($91M) to Social Engineering Scam





Source link

August 31, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
DAAPrivacyRightIcon
Gaming Gear

Whistleblower claims DOGE uploaded Social Security data to unsecure cloud server

by admin August 26, 2025



The Social Security Administration’s (SSA) chief data officer, Charles Borges, has filed a whistleblower complaint alleging that members of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) uploaded a copy of a key Social Security database to an unsecured cloud environment in June, the New York Times reported. This may have exposed the personal information of hundreds of millions of Americans. The complaint alleges that under the authority of the SSA’s Chief Information Officer, Aram Moghaddassi, a copy of the country’s Social Security information was held in a cloud environment that lacked any security oversight or adherence to SSA security protocols. The information uploaded was from the Numerical Identification System (Numident) database, and includes the names, Social Security numbers, place and date of birth, citizenship, race, ethnicity, address and even parents’ names of anyone who has ever had a Social Security number, even those who are no longer alive.

 “Mr. Borges has raised concerns internally with various authorities in the Chief Information Officer’s (CIO) office and to date has not been made aware of any remedial action. He therefore elevates his concerns out of a sense of urgency and duty to the American public,” the  complaint states. “Should bad actors gain access to this cloud environment, Americans may be susceptible to widespread identity theft, may lose vital health care and food benefits, and the government may be responsible for reissuing every American a new Social Security number at great cost.” 

The approvals to copy the Numident database were, despite the enormous risk of that information falling into the wrong hands, approved expeditiously, according to the complaint. “I have determined the business need is higher than the security risk associated with this implementation and I accept all risks,” Moghaddassi wrote in a memo. Another senior DOGE official, Michael Russo, is alleged to have signed off on the decision in under half an hour. Before accepting his position as CIO, Moghaddassi worked for then-de facto DOGE boss Elon Musk at both Neuralink and X.

In a statement to the New York Times, SSA spokesperson Nick Perrine said the agency was “not aware of any compromise to this environment” and that “the data referenced in the complaint is stored in a longstanding environment used by S.S.A. and walled off from the internet.”

That DOGE should have access to sensitive data in the first place was the subject of tension within the federal government earlier this year. Several lawsuits attempted to block DOGE from accessing SSA, Treasury and Office of Personnel Management data. Via the so-called shadow docket, the Supreme Court struck down a Fourth Circuit injunction preventing the agency from siphoning SSA data in June. Among his other allegations, Borges claims DOGE regained access to the data during the injunction period.  



Source link

August 26, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
DOGE Targeted Him on Social Media. Then the Taliban Took His Family.
Gaming Gear

DOGE Targeted Him on Social Media. Then the Taliban Took His Family.

by admin August 25, 2025


ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Reporting Highlights

  • Errors: DOGE staffers exposed a sensitive U.S.-funded Afghanistan program and falsely suggested a contractor was involved in an off-books mission.
  • Consequences: DOGE’s public outing led to a Taliban intelligence service crackdown in Kabul.
  • Fight: The Afghan scholar whom DOGE exposed is fighting to clear his name after his family was forced to flee the country.

These highlights were written by the reporters and editors who worked on this story.

It was early morning on April 1 when Mohammad Halimi, a 53-year-old exiled Afghan scholar, got a panicked message from his son. Halimi’s name had just appeared in a viral post on X, shared by none other than the site’s owner and the world’s richest man, Elon Musk.

Halimi thought his son was joking. It was April Fools’ Day after all. Musk had been assigned a big job in the Trump administration, running the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency that was established to comb through the government to root out waste and fraud.

Halimi had a much smaller job, working on a contract for the United States Institute of Peace, an independent nonprofit funded by Congress that promotes conflict resolution efforts around the world, including in Halimi’s native Afghanistan. There was no way, he thought to himself, that someone like him would have landed on Musk’s radar.

But Halimi’s son was not joking. He told Halimi to go online and see for himself. The post, which Musk shared with his 222 million followers, was real. It had already been picked up by the local press back home. And it was potentially deadly.

“United States Institute of Peace Funded Taliban,” the post read. At the bottom, the post named Halimi and described him as a “former Taliban member,” and the payments to him as U.S. support for the militants. Below that, thousands of comments tumbled in, calling him a terrorist and a grifter. Republican U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia later chimed in to congratulate Musk for discovering that “the federal government is paying the Taliban and they covered it up.”

Halimi couldn’t make any sense of it. Critics of U.S. foreign aid efforts might argue that his small contract of $132,000 with USIP amounted to waste. But if there was one thing Washington should have known about Halimi, it was that he was no enemy of America.

It was true that he’d once worked for the Taliban government that ruled Afghanistan in the 1990s, but he had switched sides after the United States invaded following 9/11. He had even served as a cabinet minister in the U.S.-backed Afghan government, where he often shared his knowledge of the Taliban’s internal workings with intelligence officials and military leaders.

In fact, during President Donald Trump’s first term in office, Halimi was part of a team of advisers that helped the U.S. prepare for difficult diplomatic talks with the Taliban, which eventually included guarantees to allow American troops safe passage out.

And his political views were easy to figure out: Halimi had made numerous media appearances as one of the Taliban’s more ardent critics, accusing them of straying from Islam’s true principles.

This all made him an obvious target. The Taliban had attempted to assassinate Halimi as a traitor at least three times during the U.S. occupation. And the U.S. government knew he had faced real danger in the past. He narrowly managed to flee Afghanistan in the final days before the U.S.-backed government fell to the Taliban, with the help of the second-highest-ranking CIA officer in the country. Since then, he had tried to live a mostly quiet life, partly to keep the relatives he’d left behind safe from retribution.

The work he was pursuing with USIP had nothing to do with supporting the Taliban. It was the opposite.

ProPublica has obtained records making clear that Musk and his team at the newly formed DOGE should have known this too. Halimi’s work at USIP was spelled out in precise detail in the agency’s records, down to the tasks he performed on specific days. His role at the institute was far from top secret, but it had been treated as highly sensitive and confidential. Among other tasks, it involved a program gathering information on the ground about living conditions for Afghan women, who are largely barred from education past primary school or from having a role in public life.

Partly because of Halimi’s contentious history with the Taliban, the militants might equate his work at USIP to espionage and severely punish anyone involved with it. By exposing him, Musk and his team endangered those working with Halimi, as well his relatives who were still in Afghanistan. The White House and Musk did not respond to requests for comment.

Multiple senior government officials at the State Department were warned about the danger that DOGE’s callout posed to Halimi’s family, according to two USIP staffers interviewed by ProPublica. They were trying to stop the damage from spreading. But Musk’s crew was then locked in a pitched battle for control of USIP. The misleading narrative about Halimi became central to DOGE’s argument; American foreign aid was corrupt and even, at times, funding America’s enemies — and that’s why DOGE had to take over.

Those battles were playing out across the government at the time. DOGE often won, but ultimately Musk’s tenure was short-lived. He resigned from DOGE at the end of May, shortly before a public falling-out with Trump. DOGE’s hard-charging takeovers of government agencies brought chaos and confusion and left many qualified bureaucrats jobless. But Halimi risked losing a lot more.

Shortly after Halimi spoke to his son, a flood of threatening messages began appearing on his phone. The most ominous came from members of the Taliban. Just as Halimi had worried, they accused him of being a thief and traitor, which could be like a death sentence for anyone connected to him back home. “My family was in great danger,” Halimi thought to himself.

About a week after DOGE outed him, Halimi’s worst fears were realized. Taliban intelligence agents in Kabul descended on the homes of his relatives and detained three of his family members. They were blindfolded, thrown into the backs of 4×4 pickup trucks and driven to a small remote prison. They were held incommunicado over several days and repeatedly beaten and questioned about Halimi and his recently publicized yet ambiguous work for the United States.

The account of the beatings is based on interviews with multiple people familiar with the events. ProPublica did not interview any sources in Afghanistan, a country where people are sometimes imprisoned for speaking out against the government.

Zabihullah Mujahid, chief government spokesperson for the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, said Halimi “is not important to us and we do not want to talk about him that much.” He added that there was no active criminal investigation targeting him. The spokesperson did not answer questions about the treatment of Halimi’s family, saying, “I do not consider it necessary to answer.”

While Halimi felt powerless to do anything, his relatives in Afghanistan braced themselves for even worse. He tried to put on a brave face, though he knew from his own near-death experiences with the Taliban that the situation was increasingly bleak.

“To keep the morale of the family high, I did not show them my panic,” he told ProPublica in one of multiple interviews conducted through a translator.

He’d been frantically reaching out to his bosses in Washington to ask what was behind Musk’s social media blasts against him and to seek help clearing his name. But everyone Halimi worked with had been fired.

A 28-year-old college dropout named Nate Cavanaugh had been installed as USIP’s new president. DOGE had ousted its leader, State Department veteran George E. Moose.

Halimi and his loved ones were on their own. Maybe, they hoped, this would all pass if they stayed quiet and lay low. Then Musk and DOGE took their campaign against USIP and Halimi to another level.

In May, a little more than a month later, DOGE invited Fox News host Jesse Watters to sit in and film one of its team meetings. It was the first major media appearance by the larger DOGE team. For nearly 30 minutes on prime-time TV, Musk and more than a dozen triumphant young men in suits sat around a table congratulating one another. They swapped war stories about the government fraud they had exposed and the wasteful bureaucrats they had brought to heel.

At that point, DOGE was riding high: It had mostly shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development, the main foreign aid agency. The watchdog Consumer Financial Protection Bureau had been reduced to a skeleton crew. And at the Department of Education, DOGE had cut hundreds of millions of dollars to an internal research arm that tracks the performance of public schools.

For weeks, DOGE had been posting online hundreds of contracts it had canceled and tallying up the savings — though in multiple cases, the totals were later found to be wildly off, or the contracts mostly misrepresented. The White House has defended the accuracy of DOGE’s claims, with a spokesperson recently saying, “All numbers are rigorously scrubbed with agency procurement officials.”

With Watters, the DOGE team zeroed in on government spending. Steve Davis, Musk’s right-hand man at DOGE, shared an eye-popping example of waste from the Education Department. He said that the department had misused taxpayer money by funding parties at Caesars Palace, a casino and hotel in Las Vegas, before DOGE implemented new requirements to submit receipts. The claim appeared to have little resemblance to the truth: One school district in Utah had used DOE funds to send teachers to an education conference hosted at a Caesars hotel. Davis did not reply to a request for comment.

Musk went around the table, prodding the other members of the team as they one-upped one another with outrageous examples of their own. With each story, Watters egged them on, raising his eyebrows in disbelief. Every so often, the DOGE team would burst into laughter.

At one point, Musk cued Cavanaugh with an awkward joke about how the work he’d found being done at the United States Institute of Peace was actually “the opposite of the title.”

Cavanaugh agreed, saying, “It was by far the least peaceful agency we worked with.” To prove his point, he turned toward Watters and said he’d uncovered documents showing that the agency was making payments to a contractor associated with the Taliban.

Watters looked at Cavanaugh in disbelief: “Get out of here.”

“This is real,” Cavanaugh said. Watters raised a hand, pressing on: “What was the money going to the Taliban for? … Was it for opium, or weapons, or a bribe?”

“Or nothing,” Musk interjected.

He and Watters burst into laughter. The chyron at the bottom of the screen read, “THE TALIBAN GETS DOGED.”

In a statement, a spokesperson with Fox News said, “It’s clear ProPublica is trying to insert FOX News into this story despite acknowledging the network having no part in any unmasking or identification of the independent contractor.” The spokesperson added, “At no point was the contractor identified, and the focus of the interview was on extreme spending practices and potential billing fraud within government agencies.”

In an email, Cavanaugh said he was mandated by Trump to dismantle the USIP, and “that includes the contract with former Taliban member Mohammad Qasem Halimi.” Cavanaugh added, “An overwhelming majority of Americans would agree that the Federal Government should not be funding former members of the Taliban when our country is $36T in debt.” He did not respond to questions about why DOGE chose to publicize Halimi’s contract or whether it knew the risk in doing so.

While DOGE initially referred to Halimi as a “former Taliban member,” the distinction was sometimes lost as Halimi’s contract became a viral social media and news story. For example, one social media post claiming that USIP had been “funding multiple terrorist organizations” was viewed by more than 180,000 people. And on Fox News, Cavanaugh dropped the reference that Halimi was a “former” Taliban member, describing his USIP work simply as payments to the Taliban.

Cavanaugh told Watters that DOGE was unable to find any justification for those payments. But ProPublica’s reporting showed that four weeks earlier, Cavanaugh had been sent dozens of pages of internal records from USIP outlining Halimi’s work in detail, according to documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. There were invoices, project descriptions, and dates and times showing what Halimi was supposed to be doing on specific days. Cavanaugh did not respond to questions about his access to these records or how they appeared to conflict with his statements on Fox News.

USIP’s own records, obtained by ProPublica, show that none of the institute’s work involved payments to the Taliban. Much of what Halimi did was actually routine foreign policy consulting: He provided expert advice to the State Department to help U.S. diplomats understand religious dynamics and civil society in Afghanistan. He was paid to attend Islamic conferences, where he made contact with other prominent political and religious figures across the Middle East on behalf of the USIP.

He was also an adviser to USIP on women’s issues in Islam, something he was uniquely qualified to do both personally and professionally. Years earlier, Halimi’s sister had been murdered by her husband in an act of domestic violence, and Halimi spoke about her openly and emotionally, recalled Mary Akrami, an Afghan women’s rights advocate who opened the country’s first women’s shelter after the Taliban fell.

As an official in the government of Hamid Karzai, Halimi was an outspoken advocate for the shelter. “He was one of the most supportive and open-minded religious scholars I have ever known,” Akrami said in an interview.

Halimi went on to serve in a number of high-profile posts in the U.S.-backed government, including as an investigator at the Supreme Court, a spokesperson for the national religious council, an adviser to the national security council, and finally the minister for religious affairs and hajj under the last democratically elected president, Ashraf Ghani.

After the Fox News interview, Halimi was struggling to move forward. By early spring, the Taliban had released his beaten and terrified family members. But they made it clear that they expected Halimi to publicly admit that he was an American spy. There were no good options. Such an admission would mean that his family would never be safe again, since they’d forever be associated with a traitor. But if he refused, they would also be under constant pressure.

Halimi had barely escaped the country four years earlier, when the U.S.-backed government he worked for collapsed in the face of a rapid Taliban military advance into the capital. A prominent Taliban cleric had publicly singled him out as an apostate — a traitor to Islam — placing a bullseye on his head. And Halimi said that a broad amnesty offer from the Taliban, extended to most of their enemies, would not apply to him. (The Taliban spokesperson told ProPublica that Halimi was free to return to Afghanistan.)

The situation was dire, and the U.S. government knew it too. In those final days, a CIA operative reached out to Halimi and directed him to catch an evacuation flight. Disguised as an ambulance driver and with his nephew donning a nurse outfit, Halimi evaded multiple Taliban checkpoints en route to the U.S.-controlled airbase at Bagram. A CIA spokesperson declined to comment. The Pentagon declined to comment and referred questions about Halimi’s past work with the U.S. to the State Department.

“I never cried harder in my life than I did that night when I left my country,” he told ProPublica. “But I had no choice.”

It wasn’t Halimi’s first time in exile.

When he was 7 years old, his mother took him and his six siblings across the border to Pakistan to escape the civil war that engulfed Afghanistan after the Soviet invasion. “My earliest recollections are just of war, of violence, of blood and of killings,” Halimi said. “My mother used to tell me Afghanistan was a peaceful place in the past. I have no memory of it.”

Halimi’s father, the town imam in a rural Afghan village, had died when Halimi was young. He and his siblings grew up in a tent across the border within a refugee camp. From a dirt-floored classroom, Halimi found a way out through a scholarship to study Islamic law in Egypt.

Halimi’s time in Cairo, where he socialized with international students from across the globe, changed him. He began looking at the world differently, he said, with a curiosity about other cultures and a lifelong interest in foreign languages.

But by the time he returned home, a group of conservative religious students turned rebel fighters were dominating Afghanistan’s messy, multisided civil war and had consolidated power over the capital. They were known as the Taliban.

Halimi took a job in a government office responsible for dealing with foreign diplomats, not because he believed in Taliban ideology, but because, for a man with a college degree and political aspirations, “it was the only good job I could find,” he said.

Then came the U.S. invasion, which ousted the Taliban government and ushered in a bloody, protracted war. The George W. Bush administration ordered the detention of swaths of the Taliban government at a giant prison at Bagram Airfield. Halimi was among them. The treatment was brutal. He was constantly shackled by his hands and feet, except for short bathroom breaks. But along the way, he said, he learned English and built an understanding of his captors.

While some prominent Taliban fighters and leaders were sent to Guantanamo, Halimi, as a relatively unknown bureaucrat, was part of a group that was gradually let out. Some people were enlisted to join the U.S.-backed government; their experience made them useful to Washington and its local allies’ efforts to understand, and even communicate with, the Taliban.

In those early days of the conflict, the U.S. military and intelligence communities were under tremendous pressure to stop further attacks on the homeland. Yet they knew virtually nothing about their assumed enemy. What followed was two decades of American military intervention across the region that led to hundreds of thousands of civilian deaths and the resurgence of the very groups the U.S. once sought to unseat.

When U.S. forces finally withdrew for good from Afghanistan in late 2021, so did Halimi. His country had been savaged by warring powers for decades. Somehow, he had managed to stay alive through all of it, but now there was no place for him.

Nate Cavanaugh had nothing in his background to suggest he would be chosen to wind down an international conflict-resolution agency. His 15 minutes of fame on Fox News represented an unlikely turn for a young man who’d spent his short career founding niche tech startups.

Cavanaugh comes from a wealthy family — his father built a $100 million sports supplement company — and he told people he was inspired by the tech mogul Peter Thiel. He started two small companies, which focused on specialized software tools to help companies manage their finances and intellectual property. But investors in both told ProPublica that neither company successfully took off.

When DOGE was announced, Cavanaugh was eager to join up, a former co-worker told ProPublica. It’s not clear how he ultimately got connected to the group, but DOGE recruited heavily from young right-wing tech circles in California.

Friends and former colleagues said they’d never heard him discuss American foreign policy or show an interest in geopolitics. Yet in January, as a leader in Musk’s DOGE, he was assigned to evaluate and oversee budget cuts across a variety of federally funded international programs. Among the agencies in Cavanaugh’s portfolio were the Inter-American Foundation and African Development Foundation. He was part of the DOGE team that sought cuts at the National Endowment for the Humanities and redirected its funds to build a park full of statues of “American Heroes,” according to a lawsuit by NEH grant recipients.

But it was the U.S. Institute of Peace, housed in a futuristic, glass-encased building overlooking the Potomac River in downtown Washington, where Cavanaugh hit resistance. Established under President Ronald Reagan, the agency had once enjoyed bipartisan support. While it’s largely taxpayer funded, USIP is not a government agency; its contracts have not typically been posted publicly, and its employees operate with a degree of removal from U.S. officialdom. That gives the institute some ability to operate behind the scenes and establish relationships with figures at the center of complex conflicts — figures such as Mohammad Halimi.

It’s often pushing informal diplomacy: In 2023, for example, USIP staff helped facilitate a ceasefire between Islamic rebels and the government of the Philippines in the country’s restive south.

But in 2024, the Heritage Foundation — which led Project 2025 — published a report arguing that USIP had become a partisan, Democrat-controlled institution.

When Cavanaugh and several other DOGE officials first showed up to take control of the USIP in March, he was physically blocked from entering the building by its security chief, Colin O’Brien, who spent 15 years working as a police officer before joining the institute. Cavanaugh tried to enter again a little later, this time with two FBI agents in tow. O’Brien blocked him again, believing Cavanaugh and DOGE had no business dismantling the USIP, which had been established by Congress as an independent entity.

Over the next few days, DOGE put more pressure on O’Brien. FBI agents indicated O’Brien was the subject of a new Justice Department investigation. And they visited the home of one of his subordinates for questioning. Ultimately, the interim U.S. attorney in Washington at the time, Trump ally Edward Martin, demanded that USIP officials give DOGE access to the building.

The next time Cavanaugh appeared at the agency’s door, he and a phalanx of local police officers forced their way in. “I am a firm believer that what makes this country special is that we follow laws and process,” O’Brien said. “What happened that day was the antithesis of everything I believe in.”

An FBI spokesperson declined to comment on the role of FBI personnel in the takeover. Martin did not respond to a request for comment. A spokesperson for the Metropolitan Police Department of D.C. referred ProPublica to a published statement, which said that police officers spoke with the new acting USIP president and assisted him in removing “unauthorized individuals” from the building.

Once in possession of its offices and information systems, Cavanaugh and his team fired virtually all USIP personnel, including over 100 overseas staff. With little warning or awareness of the potential danger to overseas employees, former staffers said, they shuttered USIP offices in Pakistan, Nigeria and El Salvador. After DOGE fired USIP’s international security team, its staff in Libya feared for their safety and were forced to flee on their own across the border. Cavanaugh and his staff canceled more than 700 contracts over 12 days.

They rifled through other USIP files, spotlighting expenditures they used to publicly embarrass the institute. On Fox, DOGE also bragged about uncovering payments for “private jets,” when, in fact, records show that USIP chartered a single plane for an evacuation mission out of a war zone for its staff. Cavanaugh did not answer a question about the assertion.

Over the following weeks, the DOGE team celebrated its newfound power inside the USIP building. Members were seen smoking cigars in the office and drinking beer as they worked late into the night. The agency’s insignia was torn from the entryway.

“DOGE was completely indifferent to the effect their actions had on human beings,” said Barnett Rubin, an Afghanistan expert who has served as a senior adviser for the United Nations and State Department. All it cared about, he said, was making “its enemies look bad.”

Months after Musk’s fateful retweet, Halimi is still picking up the pieces and trying to get answers.

During his long career as an official in the Afghan government, Halimi often rubbed shoulders with senior U.S. diplomats and generals, but now no one in the Trump administration is calling him back. He proudly showed ProPublica a letter he received from Stephen Hadley, the former U.S. national security adviser under George W. Bush, thanking him for his contributions to “promoting democracy” in Afghanistan.

Former senior State Department, White House and national security officials who worked on Afghanistan over the last two decades described the Trump administration’s attack on Halimi as not only absurd, but also dangerous.

Johnny Walsh, a former State Department official who worked with Halimi, recalled that “he wanted the same thing as the Trump administration,” which was for a peaceful end to the war.

Lisa Curtis, a former senior adviser to the National Security Council who focused on Afghanistan in the first Trump administration, said, “DOGE did not do their homework. They are putting at risk individuals who are helping the United States.”

As for the graying Afghan scholar, the Taliban relented just long enough for several family members to make it out of the country. ProPublica is not disclosing how that happened or where they are for their safety, but they remain stranded without immigration status.

Cavanaugh, DOGE’s man inside USIP, announced he was leaving government service on Aug. 6. In a tweet, Cavanaugh thanked Trump “for the opportunity to help reduce wasteful spending” and said that “I’m hopeful the United States continues to prioritize sensible spending — I believe it is critical to maintain our supremacy 🇺🇸.”

USIP’s operations have been essentially frozen. Its headquarters is under federal control — standing empty aside from a few security guards monitoring the entrances. A new acting president, Darren Beattie, was named in late July.

Beattie is a former Duke University professor and Trump speechwriter who was fired in 2018 after it came out that he spoke at a conference regularly attended by white nationalists. Beattie did not address a ProPublica question about the event but previously dismissed the criticism, calling it “an honor to be attacked by the far-left.”

At USIP, he has promised to rebuild the organization to match the Trump administration’s foreign policy priorities.

In an emailed statement to ProPublica, Beattie defended the administration’s treatment of Halimi. The takeover of USIP, he wrote, “underscores President Trump’s resolve to end the weaponization of government, cut off funding to adversaries, and shut down reckless so-called peacebuilding programs that end up undermining our national security.”

George Foote, the former head lawyer of USIP who still represents its old leadership in ongoing litigation against the Trump administration, called DOGE’s outing of Halimi “criminally careless.”

Halimi remains without work. He wonders how he will support his wife and children and whether there’s any chance he can clear his name. At the very least, he hopes that the Trump administration will admit the error that has caused his family so much harm.

In one of ProPublica’s final interviews, Halimi made a last request: Could we help him get an audience with Musk?

“Why would one of the richest men in the world commit such an act of injustice?” Halimi asked. “Sometimes I think that if Elon Musk himself were fully informed about this matter, he would likely be deeply ashamed.”



Source link

August 25, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Crypto Trader’s $2M social pressure campaign claims MEXC froze $3M for a year
NFT Gaming

Crypto Trader’s $2M social pressure campaign claims MEXC froze $3M for a year

by admin August 25, 2025



A cryptocurrency trader launched a $2 million social media pressure campaign against MEXC, claiming that the digital asset exchange had frozen more than $3 million worth of his personal funds for no clear reason.

In July 2025, centralized cryptocurrency exchange (CEX) MEXC allegedly froze $3.1 million worth of personal funds without any terms of service violations, according to pseudonymous crypto trader the White Whale.

In response, the trader is launching a $2 million social media pressure campaign against MEXC, claiming that the exchange had requested a one-year review period before unfreezing the user’s funds.

“I’m Putting a $2M Bounty Up For Grabs (half can be claimed by YOU),” wrote the White Whale in a Sunday X post, adding:

“What kind of review takes 12 months – without a single update, document, or charge?”

Numerous other traders are affected by similar account freezes, the trader said, adding that the industry’s most successful participants are “punished for winning.”

Source: the White Whale

Related: US retirement plans could fuel Bitcoin rally to $200K despite downturn: Finance Redefined

In response to his account suspension, the trader launched a social media campaign, requesting that users mint a free non-fungible token (NFT) on the Base network, tag MEXC or its chief operating officer’s X account with the “#FreeTheWhiteWhale” tag, and change their profile pictures to the above image.

For completing these tasks, $1 million of the bounty will be equally divided among the first 20,000 NFT holders, awarding each holder $50 USDC (USDC), provided that MEXC releases the frozen funds.

Another $1 million worth of USDC will be allocated to “verified, carefully vetted charities,” with the trader promising onchain receipts after the donations.

Source: The White Whale

The trader claimed to have previously completed the exchange’s Know Your Customer (KYC) verification process.

Cointelegraph was unable to verify the frozen account independently. Cointelegraph has approached MEXC for comment on the matter.

Related: Andrew Tate shorts Kanye West’s YZY, racks up $700K losses on Hyperliquid

“White whale” claims to surpass MEXC market makers before $3 million freeze

The trader claimed that his funds were frozen due to being more profitable than the exchange’s crypto market makers, firms or individuals who provide liquidity by placing consistent buy and sell orders to ensure smooth trading.

“My only conceivable offense? I was too profitable,” wrote the pseudonymous trader, adding:

“I consistently beat their external market makers – the firms they quietly partner with to be the counterparty to trades (this is public record).”

Crypto market makers are among the most misunderstood participants of the digital asset market, often blamed by traders for deliberately manipulating cryptocurrency prices, despite a lack of evidence.

Still, research from Acheron Trading suggested that 78.5% of new crypto launches between April and June 2024 were conducted in a manner that disrupted fair price discovery, detrimentally affecting both end-users and the projects themselves.

Breakdown of premarket listing approaches. Source: Acheron Trading

Moreover, 69.9% of primary token listings were “Parasitic,” meaning that market makers were exploiting premarket conditions by creating artificial scarcity and sentiment around the token.

Magazine: Solana Seeker review: Is the $500 crypto phone worth it?



Source link

August 25, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (1,098)
  • Esports (800)
  • Game Reviews (761)
  • Game Updates (906)
  • GameFi Guides (1,058)
  • Gaming Gear (960)
  • NFT Gaming (1,079)
  • Product Reviews (960)

Recent Posts

  • Arc Raiders Wants To Make Progression Wipes Less Unfair
  • Battlefield 6 Review – Good Company
  • BF6 Review: The first Battlefield game I can recommend without reservations
  • Battlefield 6 review | Rock Paper Shotgun
  • Battlefield 6 Review – Battle Ready

Recent Posts

  • Arc Raiders Wants To Make Progression Wipes Less Unfair

    October 9, 2025
  • Battlefield 6 Review – Good Company

    October 9, 2025
  • BF6 Review: The first Battlefield game I can recommend without reservations

    October 9, 2025
  • Battlefield 6 review | Rock Paper Shotgun

    October 9, 2025
  • Battlefield 6 Review – Battle Ready

    October 9, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • Arc Raiders Wants To Make Progression Wipes Less Unfair

    October 9, 2025
  • Battlefield 6 Review – Good Company

    October 9, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close