Tag:

Sell

Bitcoin price eye $117K breakout as sell pressure drops

by admin September 16, 2025

After a turbulent start to September, Bitcoin is still trading just above $115,000, and sell pressure indicators point to a possible accumulation phase.

Summary

Bitcoin price is consolidating above $115K after a brief dip, with sell pressure showing signs of easing.
Accumulation is picking up, suggesting stronger hands are absorbing supply ahead of the next move.
Resistance at $117K remains key — a breakout could open the way to $124K, while failure risks retesting lower supports.

Bitcoin is currently trading at $115,954, down 0.5% over the previous day. Weekly values have ranged from $110,870 to $116,705, which puts the asset 6.6% below its peak of $124,128 on Aug. 14.

Although it is still down 2% over the last 30 days, Bitcoin (BTC) has increased 3.4% over the last week. A 46.7% increase in daily trading volume to $45.1 billion from the previous day suggests that market activity has resumed.

Derivatives also saw momentum, with volume rising 42.18% to $75.28 billion, though open interest dipped slightly by 1.32%, suggesting traders may be cautious about taking new positions.

Analysts flag easing Bitcoin sell pressure

On Sept. 16, crypto analyst Ali Martinez noted that Bitcoin’s Sell-Side Risk Ratio had dropped below 0.1%, a level often associated with local bottoms, reduced sell pressure, and accumulation phases. Additionally, he pointed out that $116,963 is a crucial supply wall where sellers might try to profit if Bitcoin keeps rising.

Meanwhile, CryptoQuant contributor Arab Chain pointed to a sharp rise in the Bitcoin Scarcity Index on Binance, the first spike since June. When exchange supply thins out, either as a result of large investor withdrawals or a decline in sell orders, this index often rises. When this last happened, Bitcoin rose to $124,000.

However, Arab Chain cautioned that if the spike fades quickly, it could reflect speculative activity rather than sustained buying. A prolonged positive reading, by contrast, could confirm the beginning of a strong accumulation phase.

Bitcoin price technical analysis

On its daily chart, Bitcoin shows consolidation just below resistance at $117,525, and it is currently trading near the upper Bollinger Band. While the relative strength index, which is at 58, indicates neutral momentum, the Momentum and MACD indicators flash buy signals, indicating a bullish short-term scenario.

Bitcoin daily chart. Credit: crypto.news

Moving averages continue to be very supportive as Bitcoin trades above its 50-, 100-, and 200-day levels, all of which flash “buy.” This alignment indicates underlying strength, even though the commodity channel index and stochastic RSI point to overbought conditions and the possibility of a brief decline.

If Bitcoin breaks above the resistance level between $116,963 and $1117,525, it might retest its all-time high of $124,128 from August. However, the price may return to support at $112,244 and perhaps $106,963 if this is not done.

Source link

September 16, 2025 0 comments

GameFi Guides

200,537,614 DOGE Stuns Major Crypto Exchange, Sell Signal?

by admin September 14, 2025

Dogecoin has seen an increase in large transactions, those from large holders referred to as whales, in the last 48 hours. Blockchain data trackers reported a few large transactions for Dogecoin, with millions of coins moved between wallets and crypto exchanges.

The last 24 hours have seen 200,537,614 DOGE arrive at the crypto exchange OKEX in two separate transactions.

The two transactions reported by Whale Alert are 119,306,143 DOGE worth $34,625,784 transferred from an unknown wallet to OKEX and 81,231,471 DOGE worth $23,414,006 transferred from an unknown wallet to OKEX.

Dogecoin price

Dogecoin retreated after a sharp surge from $0.272 to $0.3075 on Saturday. DOGE surged for four straight days to a high of $0.3075, last seen in February, as investors reacted to latest Dogecoin market developments.

Spotify Would Prefer You Didn’t Sell Your Own Data for Profit

by admin September 14, 2025

Spotify has never been shy about the fact that the massive amount of user data it collects is a major part of its secret sauce, from its user-specific Discover Weekly playlist to the annual event that is Spotify Wrapped. But the company, which does everything it can to lock people into long listening sessions and sells ads based on user data, would really prefer it if you didn’t bottle up that sauce and resell it for your own profit. According to a report from Ars Technica, a set of users did just that to make a little profit, much to the company’s chagrin.

More than 18,000 Spotify users joined a group called Unwrapped, which set out with the goal of allowing said users to monetize their data by selling it to a third party. They found a buyer on Vana, a startup platform that allows people to sell data to firms building AI models. The idea is that users can get some cash directly by selling sources of data that are largely untapped, including things like private messages from Twitter, Reddit, and Telegram—and, in this case, listening history data from Spotify.

Through a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), the users voted on whether or not to make a sale, with 99.5% of the more than 10,000 voters approving, according to Ars Technica. They ultimately sold off artist preference data pulled from their respective Spotify profiles to a company called Solo AI, which markets itself as an AI-driven music platform. The users reportedly got $55,000 for the pool of data, which was split amongst them and distributed via cryptocurrency tokens. The final profit for each person: about $5.

If you’re factoring in whatever trouble it takes to collect the data and cash out the crypto, your mileage may vary on whether it was all worth it, but it’s interesting as a proof of concept. Now, whether that concept is good or not is a whole other question. The Electronic Frontier Foundation warns that selling your own data doesn’t actually do anything to correct the imbalance between the power held by companies that collect and cash in on user data and the users who are being constantly surveilled and monetized, and argues, “Those small checks in exchange for intimate details about you are not a fairer trade than we have now.”

Spotify also thinks selling your user data is bad, but for totally different reasons. According to Ars, the company told the developers in charge of the Unwrapped project that they were violating Spotfiy’s developer policy, which prohibits the use of Spotify content for machine learning or AI models. “Spotify honors our users’ privacy rights, including the right of portability,” Spotify’s spokesperson told the publication. “All of our users can receive a copy of their personal data to use as they see fit. That said, UnwrappedData.org is in violation of our Developer Terms, which prohibit the collection, aggregation, and sale of Spotify user data to third parties.”

Maybe Spotify is just annoyed that users are monetizing their own data when the company has struggled to figure out how to do the same. Per Business Insider, just 11% of the company’s revenue currently comes from its data-driven advertising business, well short of its 20% goal, as it has apparently been unable to crack ways to turn its massive trove of user data into ad placements that ad buyers actually want.

Source link

September 14, 2025 0 comments

Product Reviews

Intel could sell up to 49% of its foundry business to external investors, but a full IPO or spin-off is unlikely

by admin September 9, 2025

In recent months, we heard numerous rumors about Intel’s alleged plans to spin off its Intel Foundry manufacturing arm and then sell a significant stake to potential customers, or the U.S. government’s supposed intention to force Intel to spin off Intel Foundry and then make TSMC buy a 49% stake in Intel’s U.S. manufacturing operations. None of this has materialized, and it’s possible that it never will. However, at a recent industry event, Intel’s Chief Financial Officer said that the company could theoretically sell up to a 49% stake in Intel Foundry without running into issues with the U.S. government. However, given that Intel does not own 100% of Intel Foundry’s assets, would it make financial sense to spin off or IPO Intel Foundry?

“The structure of the government financing is that they also got warrants associated with Intel stock, it triggers off [if we sell] below or selling more than 50% of the business,” said David Zinsner, the CFO of Intel, at Citi’s 2025 Global TMT Conference. “I think, as long as we hold 51% essentially it does not trigger, and it is a five-year warrant. […] Our motivation will probably be not to sell below 51% because that would dilute investors significantly. Unless it made economic sense for investors for us to do that. So, the likelihood is, if we are selling stakes in Foundry, it would be something less than 49% that would be sold off.”

Keeping Intel Foundry an American foundry

According to Intel’s contract agreement with the U.S. government, under which Intel converted its grants into cash in exchange for equity, the company must control at least 51% of Intel Foundry over the next five years or risk triggering punitive clauses (a 5% warrant at $20/share). The same terms applied to Intel’s grants under the CHIPS and Science Act, so the company was obliged to maintain a majority ownership stake in its Intel Foundry for some time.

Semiconductor Co-Investment Program (SCIP)

While for now Intel controls and operates all of its semiconductor production capacities in the U.S., Ireland, and Israel, as well as packaging facilities in the U.S., Puerto Rico, Malaysia, and China, it should be noted that Intel does not completely own all of its fabs.

Back in 2022, Intel kicked off its Semiconductor Co-Investment Program (SCIP) arrangement, under which it attracted investors (and essentially raised $26 billion) without violating the CHIPS Act requirement or the U.S. government’s 51% ownership clause tied to a potential Intel Foundry spin-off.

However, this means that Intel lost 100% control of its advanced fabs. As a result, Intel’s leading-edge Fab 52 and Fab 62, located in the Ocotillo campus in Arizona, are co-owned by Intel (51%) and Brookfield Infrastructure (49%). The company’s Fab 34 in Ireland is also owned by Intel (51%) and Apollo Global Management (49%).

These arrangements under the SCIP program are not a spin-off, but asset-level co-financing structures, so the foundry unit stays inside Intel. Intel still owns and operates the fabs, but splits the capital investment with partners like Brookfield Infrastructure and Apollo Global Management. In each case, Intel retains exactly 51% equity and operational control, meaning it does not breach the U.S. government’s ownership clause for CHIPS funding or equity conversion.

In theory, if Intel decides to start building out its Silicon Heartland site in Ohio in the coming years (not sometime in the 2030s), then it can use the same SCIP program to raise the necessary capital and build new capacity without requiring a spin-off or IPO and without violating the contract with the U.S. government.

IPO is still a possibility

Potentially, Intel’s SCIP initiative does not stop a hypothetical IPO as there is a difference between corporate equity of Intel Foundry and project-level asset ownership (e.g., Fab 52, Fab 62, Fab 34). From an IPO perspective, selling 49% of Intel Foundry means selling a stake in the overall earnings and cash flow of the foundry business, not in each fab’s underlying real estate or assets.

The Intel Foundry division includes the full foundry business — such as process technologies that cost billions, design services, customer contracts, and global capacity — even if some fabs (like Fab 52/62 in Arizona and Fab 34 in Ireland) are only 51%-owned via joint ventures with Brookfield and Apollo. Intel still retains operational control of these fabs and consolidates their revenue, so they remain part of the foundry offering.

However, the partial fab ownership introduces minority interest adjustments in financial reporting, so investors would still value Intel Foundry based on its total capacity, customer pipeline, and roadmap, with appropriate discounts or disclosures for asset-level co-investments.

As a consequence, partial ownership of key fabs by third parties means Intel would likely raise less money in an Intel Foundry IPO, as investors will discount the valuation to reflect the fact that Intel does not retain 100% of the cash flow from those facilities. While Intel still controls Intel Foundry as a corporate entity and consolidates fab revenues, its share of profits from co-owned fabs is limited to 51%. Investors will factor in these minority interests and payout obligations when pricing shares. The added complexity also introduces risk, which may further reduce the valuation, which means that it may make no financial sense for Intel to IPO or spin off Intel Foundry.

Follow Tom’s Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

Source link

September 9, 2025 0 comments

Gaming Gear

Vodafone is testing an AI ‘actor’ to sell its products instead of paying a human to do it

by admin September 8, 2025

Vodafone made a commercial starring an AI avatar posing as a real lady. This is interesting because Vodafone is a major global brand and not a fly-by-night TikTok company using a ridiculous deepfake of Jackson Galaxy to sell cat toys.

The tells in the commercial are obvious and what one would expect. The AI avatar’s hair is a bit off, which ruins the charade that this is a real person. The physical mannerisms and speaking tone are also wonky. A facial mole moves around at one point. It’s AI. You know the drill.

The company responded to a question on a message board as to why it couldn’t put “a real person in front of the camera” by saying this is simply an experiment. It said it was “testing different styles of advertising — this time with AI,” and that “AI is so much a part of everyday life these days that we also try it out in advertising.”

This isn’t the first Vodafone ad to feature generative AI. It released a fully AI-generated commercial last year that spurred a bit of controversy, despite looking absolutely awful. Social media platforms are also becoming increasingly littered with AI-generated virtual influencers.

Source link

September 8, 2025 0 comments

Gaming Gear

Google doesn’t have to sell Chrome, judge in monopoly case rules

by admin September 3, 2025

Google will not have to divest its Chrome browser but will have to change some of its business practices, a federal judge has ruled. The ruling comes more than a year after the same judge ruled that Google had acted illegally to maintain a monopoly in internet search.

Following the ruling last year, the Department of Justice had proposed that Google should be forced to sell Chrome. But in a 230-page decision, Judge Amit Mehta said the government had “overreached” in its request. “Google will not be required to divest Chrome; nor will the court include a contingent divestiture of the Android operating system in the final judgment,” Mehta wrote. “Plaintiffs overreached in seeking forced divesture of these key assets, which Google did not use to effect any illegal restraints.”

Google will, however, no longer be permitted to strike exclusive deals around the distribution of search, Google Assistant, Gemini or Chrome, Mehta ruled. For example, Google can’t require device makers to pre-load its apps in order to get access to the Play Store. It also can’t condition revenue-sharing arrangements on the placement of its apps. But Google will be able to continue to pay partners — like Apple — for pre-loading search and other apps into their products. Mehta said that ending these arrangements could cause “downstream harms to distribution partners, related markets, and consumers.”

Mehta also ruled that Google will need to share some of its search data with competitors going forward. “Making data available to competitors would narrow the scale gap created by Google’s exclusive distribution agreements and, in turn, the quality gap that followed,” he wrote. The company is not required to hand over data related to its ads.

Mehta’s ruling is largely a win for the search giant, which had argued that divesting Chrome or Android “would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership.” In a statement Tuesday, Google said it had “concerns” about some aspects of the ruling.

“Today’s decision recognizes how much the industry has changed through the advent of AI, which is giving people so many more ways to find information,” the company said. “Now the Court has imposed limits on how we distribute Google services, and will require us to share Search data with rivals. We have concerns about how these requirements will impact our users and their privacy, and we’re reviewing the decision closely.”

The company previously indicated it plans to appeal Mehta’s original decision, but said in June it would wait for a final decision in the case.

Update, September 2, 2025, 4:28PM PT: This post has been updated to add a statement from Google on the ruling.

Source link

September 3, 2025 0 comments

Gaming Gear

Google Won’t Have to Sell Chrome Browser After All (But There’s a Catch)

by admin September 2, 2025

A federal judge ruled in a high-profile antitrust case against Google on Tuesday with some good news and bad news for the tech giant. The good news for Google is that it won’t have to sell off its Chrome browser, which was a very real possibility. Google’s stock soared in after hours trading on the news.

The bad news for Google was that it will be required to share data with its rivals and can’t sign many of the exclusive contracts that helped the company become so dominant in the industry.

The ruling, which is available on Court Listener, comes from Judge Amit P. Mehta of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, who first ruled in Aug. 2024 that Google’s search business was an illegal monopoly.

“Google will not be required to divest Chrome; nor will the court include a contingent divestiture of the Android operating system in the final judgment,” the ruling states. “Plaintiffs overreached in seeking forced divesture of these key assets, which Google did not use to effect any illegal restraints.”

The Chrome browser has about 3.5 billion users, which is pretty impressive when you remember that there are only about 8.1 billion people on the entire planet. And AI company Perplexity even made an unsolicited offer to by Chrome last month, though it was considered to be a stunt by many tech industry watchers. Perplexity was offering $34.5 billion but was only valued at the time at about $18 billion, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Tuesday’s ruling explained that Google will need to share “search index and user-interaction data, though not ads data,” with “qualified competitors.” The ruling also says the company “will be barred from entering or maintaining any exclusive contract relating to the distribution of Google Search, Chrome, Google Assistant, and the Gemini app,” though there are a lot of carve outs that will allow Google to enter contracts in order to not harm downstream businesses.

Google also won’t be required to present users with “choice screens on its products or encourage its Android distribution partners to do the same,” according to the ruling. And it won’t have to underwrite a nationwide public education campaign. The U.S. government has presented various remedies after Google was found to be a monopoly, but the judge considered some to be “improper” demands.

Google didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday evening. Gizmodo will update this article if we hear back.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

Source link

September 2, 2025 0 comments

Crypto Trends

‘Never Sell’ Bitcoin Bulls Hypying Up ‘Uptober.’ Are Stats on Their Side?

by admin September 1, 2025

Some cryptocurrency bulls are seemingly determined not to sell their holdings before “Uptober.”

They remain optimistic about Bitcoin’s Q4 performance, urging investors not to overcomplicate seasonality.

Does “Uptober” live up to its name?

The term “Uptober,” which is obviously a mix of “up” and “October,” was initially popularized on cryptocurrency Twitter.

Based on historical data, October has been one of the most successful months for Bitcoin due to the consistency of positive returns.

Does the data back up the enthusiasm of Bitcoin bulls? Absolutely. Since 2013, there were only two months when Bitcoin ended October in the red (2014 and 2018). Back in 2014, the cryptocurrency was down 13% amid a brutal bear market triggered by the collapse of the Mt. Gox exchange and regulatory scrutiny. In October 2018, Bitcoin was down 3%, remaining in the middle of another market capitulation that came after the ICO-driven euphoria of late 2017.

The rest of the months were firmly in the green. In 2013, for instance, Bitcoin rallied by as much as 61% in October when the cryptocurrency began attracting more mainstream interest.

In 2021, Bitcoin also surged by a whopping 40% in October due to the hype surrounding the approval of the first futures-based BTC ETFs in the US. These products came years before spot ETFs.

Source link

September 1, 2025 0 comments

NFT Gaming

Pundit Warns XRP Investors Not To Sell Their Tokens In The Next 3 Months

by admin August 28, 2025

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Crypto pundit UnknowDLT has explained why XRP investors should not sell their tokens within the next three months. This came as he suggested that the altcoin could witness a massive adoption wave, thanks to the event that could occur within this period.

Pundit Reveals Why XRP Investors Should Not Sell Their Tokens Before November

In an X post, UnknowDLT highlighted the end of the Ripple SEC case and the global adoption of ISO 20022 as reasons why investors should not sell their XRP before November. He noted that the XRP lawsuit already ended on August 22, the day that the Appeals Court approved Ripple and SEC’s joint dismissal of the case.

Meanwhile, the pundit stated that the ISO 20022 global adoption will occur by November 22. This is the new financial messaging standard for global payments, and several banks and financial institutions have confirmed plans to adopt this new messaging standard. This could positively impact XRP, as Ripple’s payment solution is ISO 20022 compliant.

XRP serves as the bridge currency in Ripple’s payment services and could gain greater adoption as more financial giants become ISO 20022 compliant, as they may be open to utilizing Ripple’s payment rails. It is worth mentioning that UnknowDLT made these statements in relation to an earlier X post by a community member who told investors that they need to hold their XRP for the next three months once the lawsuit ends.

They both likely expect major developments during this period to catalyze higher prices for XRP. This is based on the fact that the Ripple SEC lawsuit is believed to have suppressed the token’s price action. Moreover, it also hindered some partnerships that Ripple could have secured, which would have boosted XRP’s adoption.

XRP ETF Approval Could Happen Within This Period

The SEC’s approval of the pending XRP ETF applications is one of the major developments that could happen before November. The Commission recently delayed its decision on these funds to October, when it must approve or disapprove the proposed rule change to list and trade shares of these funds.

Despite this delay, Bloomberg analysts Eric Balchunas and James Seyffart predict that there is a 95% chance that the SEC will approve these XRP ETFs. Market expert Nate Geraci is also confident that the Commission will approve these funds and doubled down on his belief when the Ripple case approached its end.

Moreover, the XRP ETF issuers recently amended the S-1 forms for their respective funds, which Seyffart described as a good sign. He noted that this indicates that the SEC has provided feedback to the issuers.

At the time of writing, the XRP price is trading at around $3, down in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP trading at $3.0 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Featured image from iStock, chart from Tradingview.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Source link

August 28, 2025 0 comments

Product Reviews

Abxylute will sell an absurd 3D handheld from Intel and Tencent Games for “under $1,700”

by admin August 23, 2025

As the handheld PC boom has taken off, companies have tried to push the boundaries of the Steam Deck form factor Valve helped popularize. Lenovo tried detachable controllers. Acer is trying an 11-inch screen. And Abxylute is apparently combining them both (and then some) into the Abxylute 3D One, which The Verge reports features an 11-inch, glasses-free 3D display and detachable controllers, all for “under $1,700.”

The Abxylute 3D One is based on a hardware prototype co-developed by Intel and Tencent that the companies demoed at CES 2025. The prototype, dubbed the “Sunday Dragon 3D One,” featured a display that used eye-tracking to achieve its 3D effect. The version Abxylute is selling seems to be offering more or less the same features, with an Intel Lunar Lake chip, 32GB of LPDDR5X RAM, an 120Hz display and a built-in kickstand.

The Abxylute 3D One’s controllers can detach like Joy-Cons, which leaves it looking like a chunky Surface Pro.

(Abxylute)

“Abxylute claims the product’s specifically optimized to deliver 3D for 50 of the top Steam games,” The Verge writes, though it can also be used for more than gaming if you’re desperate. The Abxylute 3D One will include software for converting 2D photos and video to 3D, and a detachable keyboard accessory complete with a trackpad.

No part of what Abxylute is offering here seems particularly practical, but if you like 3D and are into the company’s maximalist approach, you could be getting a deal. Acer’s 11-inch handheld, the Acer Nitro Blaze 11, starts at $1,100. A 3D laptop like the ASUS ProArt Studiobook 16 starts at $2,000. The Abxylute 3D One could approximate the features of both for a fairly reasonable price in the middle.

That might not make up for the fact that it seems too heavy to hold for more than 30 minutes at a time, but you can put that to the test yourself when the Abxylute 3D One goes on sale in “late September or early October.”

Source link

August 23, 2025 0 comments