Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

Regulation

Uk And Us Joint Task Force For Digital Asset Regulation
Crypto Trends

UK and US Joint Task Force for Digital Asset Regulation

by admin September 23, 2025



On September 22, 2025, the United Kingdom and the United States announced the formation of the “Transatlantic Taskforce for Markets of the Future.” The initiative, led by UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and US Commerce Secretary Scott Bessent, aims to increase collaboration on key financial topics, with a specific focus on digital assets. The move signals a potential step toward a unified Anglo-American regulatory approach for the crypto industry.

UK-US corridor

The task force was unveiled in an official announcement by Chancellor Reeves. Its stated goals are to enhance collaboration on capital markets and digital assets, according to a government press release. This partnership builds on an existing financial relationship valued at £1.2 trillion in mutual investment.

The UK and US are deeply linked with £1.2 trillion invested between us.

Today @SecScottBessent and I have established the Transatlantic Taskforce for Markets of the Future, enhancing collaboration on key topics such as capital markets and digital assets.https://t.co/gdtZFzMJXx

— Rachel Reeves (@RachelReevesMP) September 22, 2025

While specific details on the task force’s agenda remain limited, the explicit inclusion of “digital assets” represents an advance in their relation. The collaboration can be motivated by a desire to create a more attractive and streamlined regulatory environment for crypto businesses, as well as grow the capital market the relation between the UK-US.

Europe’s regulatory dominance

A unified UK-US regulatory framework can present a challenge to the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, which is currently the most comprehensive crypto framework globally. This partnership can intensify “regulatory arbitrage,” where crypto firms select where they want to act based on the place that seems more favorable. If the UK and US align their policies, they could create a necessary regulatory bloc capable of shifting the industry’s center of gravity away from the EU.

The establishment of the UK-US task force is an important diplomatic partnership; it represents a potential first move in reshaping global cryptocurrency policy. Industry participants and policymakers will now be closely watching for the task force’s first whitepapers and policy recommendations. The initiative can mark the beginning of a new, two-bloc era in global crypto regulation.

Also read: UK Crypto Petition Backed by Coinbase Passes 5,000 Signatures





Source link

September 23, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Is US crypto regulation favoring CeFi over DeFi?
Crypto Trends

Is US crypto regulation favoring CeFi over DeFi?

by admin September 21, 2025



Once heralded as a disruptive alternative to traditional finance, the DeFi (decentralized finance) sector now faces competition from CeFi (centralized finance)—a hybrid model that blends crypto’s financial rewards with the familiar convenience of centralized platforms.

Summary

  • While the current administration is not suppressing decentralized platforms, it doesn’t focus on this space either.
  • The CLARITY Act is set to clarify the legal status of cryptocurrencies. The crypto community members shared the principles of decentralization that should be included in the bill.
  • There is a risk that centralized companies will disguise themselves as decentralized to benefit from the “innovator exempt.”

While much is said about the support of the Trump Administration for the crypto sector in general, tech attorney Alexander Urbelis and other experts believe that the U.S. regulators favor CeFi over DeFi.

But Urbelis warns that the U.S. regulators’ leaning toward facilitating centralized crypto businesses creates dangers. His concerns were outlined in the Unchained media article on Sept. 17.

Generally, U.S. regulators are more focused on platforms and products that comply with anti-money laundering (AML) laws and collect user data.

What’s the difference between DeFi and CeFi?

While DeFi and CeFi platforms offer similar services—like cryptocurrency exchange and yield farming—the key difference lies in control.

Blockchain Association co-founder Connor Spelliscy outlines seven principles of decentralization, developed with input from over 40 industry experts:

  • Open: The source code should be available to the public.
  • Autonomous: The network should be controlled by the encoded rules without human intervention.
  • Permissionless: No one can restrict the use of the network for others unilaterally.
  • Non-Custodial: The platform doesn’t store private keys of its users. Only users themselves are in charge of keeping their keys and private data.
  • Distributed: No person or group of people can perform changes to the network unilaterally, nor can they control large portions of the token supply.
  • Credibly Neutral: The code doesn’t provide anyone with the network privileges over other users.
  • Economically Independent: The network mechanisms facilitate the token value growth.

These principles stand in stark contrast to the approach of U.S. policymakers, particularly in the CLARITY Act, which may allow companies to self-certify as decentralized.

This could lead to discrepancies in how decentralization is defined, allowing centralized platforms to exploit the benefits meant for true DeFi projects.

Spelliscy warns that without clear definitions, opportunistic companies may pass themselves off as DeFi while enjoying the regulatory advantages intended for innovators.

Does the U.S. crypto regulation favor CeFi over DeFi?

The CLARITY Act aims to define the legal status of cryptocurrencies, but it’s still unclear whether decentralized projects will thrive under the current administration.

While regulators have paused legal actions against major CeFi players like Circle, Binance, and Coinbase, they’ve taken a harsher stance on DeFi developers such as those behind Samourai Wallet and Tornado Cash, who face prison for creating privacy tools.

The $USDH debate is one of the more interesting events in recent crypto memory — a case where US policy (the GENIUS Act) is crucial to a major design decision.

I have no vote, but I do see some misunderstanding about GENIUS worth clarifying. A few points to consider for those…

— Jake Chervinsky (@jchervinsky) September 10, 2025

The passage of the GENIUS Act in 2025, which sets the framework for stablecoin issuers, is seen as a step forward. However, critics argue it only lays the groundwork for further regulation. While stablecoins serve as a key entry point to DeFi, the U.S. government’s oversight—requiring issuers to obtain permission and collect user data—undermines decentralization.

In sum, the Trump administration doesn’t actively target decentralized platforms, but it clearly seems to favor CeFi over DeFi.





Source link

September 21, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
U.s. And U.k. To Announce Closer Cooperation On Crypto Regulation
GameFi Guides

U.S. and U.K. to Announce Closer Cooperation on Crypto Regulation

by admin September 16, 2025



The UK and the US are set to announce a new agreement on digital assets, with the goal of adopting closer regulatory alignment and boosting investment. The move, which comes amid President Donald Trump’s state visit to the UK, is seen as a direct response to growing concerns that British companies are falling behind their US counterparts in the digital asset space.

On the other side of the Atlantic, businesses want higher valuations. Because of this, they are shifting their listings from the London Stock Exchange to the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq. This has caused a lot of political stress, which has now been followed by a push.

The topic about closer cooperation between both the countries was a central one during a meeting between UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday. 

The discussion included key figures from major financial institutions and crypto firms like Coinbase, Circle, and Ripple, as well as banks such as Citi and Bank of America. According to Financial Times the meeting was organized following a letter from UK crypto industry groups urging the government to prioritize digital assets during the state visit.

Change in UK Strategy

The agreement represents a shift for the UK, which has been criticized by some in the industry for its cautious regulatory approach. The Trump administration has taken a more supportive stance toward the crypto industry, and UK officials believe that aligning with US policies is “vital to unlocking adoption” in Britain.

Former Conservative Chancellor George Osborne, now with Coinbase, has publicly stated that the UK is being “completely left behind” in the cryptocurrency sector. This sentiment is shared by many in the British crypto community who feel that regulatory uncertainty is driving businesses to more favorable jurisdictions, particularly the US.

Stablecoins and Digital Sandboxes

The new agreement is expected to specifically address stablecoin cryptocurrencies pegged to traditional currencies. The UK and US are reportedly working on developing digital securities sandboxes. These would allow companies to test blockchain-based financial services in a controlled environment. 

The concept of a joint US-UK digital sandbox was previously proposed by SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce to give regulators more data and allow companies to serve both markets simultaneously.

Reeves had previously emphasized the need for the UK’s capital markets to remain competitive and has noted Commissioner Peirce’s proposals for collaboration on digital topics. While the Treasury declined to comment on the specifics of the new proposals, Reeves’ public statements underscore the government’s focus on attracting investment and strengthening the UK’s financial sector.

Also Read: SEC And CFTC Launch Joint Push for Crypto Regulation Clarity



Source link

September 16, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Sec Engages Bitgo On &Quot;Project Crypto&Quot; To Modernize Regulation
GameFi Guides

SEC Engages BitGo on “Project Crypto” to Modernize Regulation

by admin September 12, 2025



BitGo Inc., a leading developer of institutional digital asset infrastructure, had a meeting with U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Paul Atkins on September 10, 2025 and appropriate personnel to discuss the agency’s “Project Crypto” initiative. The meeting included two of BitGo’s leadership figures: Co-Founder and CEO Mike Belshe and Vice President of Corporate Development J. Baylor Myers.

The focus of the discussion was to refresh custody rules, increase market transparency, and adopt recommendations from the President Trump crypto working group.

Why did SEC meet BitGo?

BitGo’s delegation, led by Belshe and Myers, presented their perspective on adapting existing custody rules for digital assets. The discussion focused on the need for clear guidelines for market participants and the role of qualified custodians in ensuring investor protection. The agenda, which was also attached to the SEC memo, included topics such as:

Custody Rule Enhancements: BitGo aims to give best practices for secure storage, such as multi-signature wallets, and offer guidance on how to modify existing rules to mitigate crypto-specific risks such as private key management and cyber security threats.

Congressional Bills: The company delegates wish to discuss how the SEC can utilize its authority to enact change that is incremental to pending market structure bills and the GENIUS Act.

Market Structure: BitGo will present its view of how broker-dealers and investment advisers can compliantly manage crypto transactions in a changing regulatory environment.

The meeting follows SEC Chairman Paul Atkins’ landmark speech in July, where he unveiled “Project Crypto” and signaled a pivot away from the prior administration’s enforcement-heavy approach. The initiative seeks to establish clear rules for crypto asset distributions, custody, and trading.

The meeting with BitGo is a clear indication that the SEC is actively seeking input from industry leaders as it develops its new framework. At the same time, BitGo’s request also reflects an increasing interest among industry champions to engage actively with regulators.

Also Read: SEC Delays Franklin Solana ETF Decision to November 2025



Source link

September 12, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Mudrex Survey 93% Of Indian Investors Support Crypto Regulation
GameFi Guides

93% of Indian Investors Support Crypto Regulation

by admin September 10, 2025



Mudrex, one of India’s biggest crypto investment platforms, has come out with a new survey on how Indians see regulation, taxation and the future of digital assets. The survey is titled “What India Thinks: Crypto Regulation, Taxation & Investment Trends.” It is based on the views of more than 9,000 people from different regions, professions, and income groups. 

The most significant finding is that 93% of respondents support crypto regulation. Of these, 56% asked for a full framework with investor protection, 24% said lighter oversight would be better for innovation, and 13% wanted regulation to be limited to taxation. Half of those surveyed also supported the idea of a separate regulator for crypto.

1/5 India is already the global leader in #crypto adoption 🌏

But beyond headlines, what do everyday investors really think?

We conducted one of the country’s largest surveys to capture investor voices, across age, income and profession, on:

⚖️ Regulation
📈 Behaviour & Trends… pic.twitter.com/qkpv01Z74X

— Mudrex (@officialmudrex) September 9, 2025

Edul Patel, CEO and Co-Founder of Mudrex, noted that India is already leading global crypto adoption with the talent, appetite, and scale to shape the digital asset economy. However, he emphasized that achieving this potential requires clear regulation. According to him, the survey highlights that investors are not opposed to rules, but to the uncertainty surrounding them.

Taxes Remain the Biggest Pain Point

Taxation came out as the biggest roadblock. About 84% of participants called the current system unfair compared to other assets. Two-thirds said the 30% tax on gains was the biggest deterrent. Other issues included not being able to offset losses (12%), fraud concerns (12%), 1% TDS (7%), and exchange fees (3%).

Nearly nine in 10 investors said they would put more money into crypto if government policies were clearer. Out of these, 55% strongly backed the idea, while 35% said they would be encouraged if taxes were brought down.

Long-Term Outlook

Most respondents see crypto as more than a quick trade. About 64% said they view it as a tool for long-term wealth creation. Curiosity drives 14% of investors, 12% look at it for short-term profits, and 6% treat it as a safeguard against inflation. Just 4% are still unsure.

Where Investors Learn About Crypto

For most, YouTube is the go-to source, with 43% depending on it for updates. News outlets follow at 19%, then friends and family at 15%, and platforms like X at 14%. Education is also on the wish list, with 77% wanting blockchain and crypto to be part of college courses in India.

Politics and Policy Outlook

Crypto has entered the political space as well. About 67% of investors said they are very likely to back a party that supports digital assets, while 24% are somewhat likely. Only 9% said policy would not affect their vote.

At the same time, 78% believe India is already late in embracing crypto and Web3. With the government preparing a discussion paper, the survey offers a clear message: investors want clarity, fair taxation, and practical rules to match India’s growing role in global adoption.

Also Read: Indian Crypto Exchanges See 70–80% Volume From Perp Futures





Source link

September 10, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Luna Snow Mirae 2099 in Marvel Rivals
Esports

LoL player is so unhappy with a $250 gacha skin that they’re calling for government regulation

by admin August 31, 2025



A very passionate Morgana main on Reddit has spent months talking about how they want improvements to Spirit Blossom Morgana, an Exalted skin they spent around $250 USD on.

Exalted skins are only available for a limited time and have to be rolled for via a gacha system. If you get lucky, you’ll nab the skin early on without having to spend too much money. However, drop rates are astronomically low, and the majority of people who get Exalted skins should expect to pay around $250 for them.

Article continues after ad

Riot has explained that these skins are meant to be “hyper-exclusive“, that they’re made for truly dedicated fans who’d be willing to dish a ton of money for what Riot’s calling a “luxury good”.

However, one extremely dedicated Morgana main was very unhappy with the Spirit Blossom skin, and it’s not even because it was expensive. Rather, they were expecting to get more for their money and feel that its quality is far below that of other skins of its kind. After months of discussing how they’d like to see the skin get improved, they’re going to Europe’s government and seeking legal action.

Article continues after ad

Article continues after ad

Dedicated Morgana main seeks legal action

Reddit user LoveForNuWa has been documenting their journey with this skin for months. The only thing they’ve posted about since June is the Spirit Blossom Morgana skin, complaining on various Reddit threads and trying to show why they believe it’s far below the standard they expected.

Their sentiment isn’t exactly unique, either. It’s not that people don’t like the skin, it’s that they believe it’s missing features that are advertised as part of the Exalted skin experience and just isn’t worth the up to $250. This user in particular doesn’t have an issue with spending that much on a skin, they’re just disappointed by what they got.

Article continues after ad

Steve ZhangThe concept artist’s mock up for what Spirit Blossom Morgana was meant to look like in-game

So, instead of making more Reddit posts, they went to government regulators.

“With Riot’s boldness in selling this skin for €250 in the state that it’s in, and with so many players pointing out issues, missing features, as well as its clear incomparability to other Exalted skins – I felt this raised serious questions. Especially when the product fails to adhere to Riot’s own official statements about what Exalted skins are meant to represent and the standards they are expected to meet,” they claimed.

Article continues after ad

Article continues after ad

“Long story short, yes, I actually wrote an official email to the European Commission briefly outlining the situation and asking for their view on whether Riot’s handling of this release is in line with current consumer rights and digital product standards.”

This was posted on July 25, 2025 and was followed by a month of silence. But, on August 29, 2025, the user broke their silence and returned with a response from Austria’s European Consumer Center as to what options they can take.

Article continues after ad

They’re going to go with the third option, pooling as many player complaints as they can and sending them straight to Austria’s authorities to go to Riot on their behalf. This would then go to Ireland’s government (where Riot is based in Europe) and confront them directly. You can read the response from Austria’s Consumer Center in full here.

The Redditor concluded with this:

“This is not a malicious attack on Riot Games. I’m simply a long-time customer growing increasingly concerned about Riot’s direction, their failure to follow and uphold their own standards, their disregard for their official statements and their inconsistency with premium, high-end products like Exalted skins. Expecting players to accept this without question or consequence isn’t right and a company, especially one of Riot’s scale, isn’t exempt from following rules and laws – including those regarding digital content – and should be held accountable.

Article continues after ad

Article continues after ad

Steve Zheng/Riot GamesConcept art for Spirit Blossom Morgana

“Ultimately, my goal isn’t about money — I’d rather see Riot fix, adjust, polish and overhaul Spirit Blossom Morgana, bring the product up to true Exalted quality, and let everyone enjoy it for what it’s sold as.”

From here, they plan to rally the Morgana mains community and continue to pressure Riot so they can get a skin they believe is worth the full $250.



Source link

August 31, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Regulation encourages the separation of income and liquidity
NFT Gaming

Regulation encourages the separation of income and liquidity

by admin August 24, 2025



Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

Digital assets have long grappled with regulatory ambiguity, but two recently enacted United States legislative pieces are ending an era of chaos by delivering structural clarity. The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act) and the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (Clarity Act) are potent signals of a major shift in how digital assets are built, traded, and understood.

Summary

  • The GENIUS Act ring-fences stablecoin liquidity — requiring 1:1 backing in highly liquid assets, banning yield for simply holding, and segregating reserves to prevent rehypothecation.
  • Income and liquidity are now legally separated — yield-generating activity must happen on distinct layers or products, freeing the base liquidity layer from speculative pressure.
  • The Clarity Act defines digital commodities vs. investment contracts — giving builders a modular framework to separate utility tokens from profit-driven schemes, reducing SEC/CFTC turf wars.
  • Regulatory certainty fuels innovation — clearer rules, consumer protections, and risk disclosures are drawing praise from industry leaders and setting the stage for U.S. leadership in crypto.

Most importantly, there is now a logical basis of separation between income-generating mechanisms and underlying liquidity. Let’s unpack what that means.

How the GENIUS Act ring-fences liquidity

The GENIUS Act targets payment stablecoins with unprecedented precision, mandating that they must be 1:1 backed by highly liquid assets, like U.S. dollars or short-term treasuries. Reserves must be held in segregated accounts without re-hypothecation (the holding institute cannot use the funds). The act also explicitly prohibits interest or yield payments solely for holding, using, or retaining stablecoins.

With a separation of income and liquidity, we can unequivocally define stablecoins as a pure form of base-layer liquidity, perfect for payments, settlements, and stable value transfers. In the U.S., they are no longer a passive income vehicle, and by stripping them of their yield mechanisms, the GENIUS Act forces builders to innovate. 

For U.S.-based crypto investors, any yield-generating activity involving stablecoins must now take place on a separate layer or financial product, distinct from the stablecoin itself. Some may not be thrilled by this news, but this regulatory clarity ensures that speculative yield expectations unburden the liquidity layer. This will force disruption in one of the most widely adopted use cases for cryptocurrency. 

The Clarity Act is an architect for modular systems

Complementing the GENIUS Act is the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (H.R. 3633). This passed the House and is heading to the Senate, aiming to resolve the longstanding jurisdictional ambiguities between the SEC and CFTC. It introduced statutory definitions for various digital assets, notably distinguishing “digital commodities” from “investment contracts.”

From now on, digital commodities will be those that derive their value from utility within a network. Investment contracts, however, will be vehicles through which a profit expectation from the efforts of others is conveyed. The core utility token (now a digital commodity) will be separated from any associated investment schemes or yield-generating activities (now investment contracts). This clarity will empower projects to build modular systems and go to market without worrying that the SEC may challenge their activities. 

Yield-bearing layers vs. Base-layer liquidity

There’s now a framework in place to separate the different functions of a blockchain system and regulate them accordingly. This is thanks to the Clarity Act’s provisions regarding tailored registration for digital commodity offerings and its recognition of “Decentralized Systems” and “Decentralized Finance Trading Protocols”. Consider this a kind of regulatory sandbox and definitive demarcation line between “yield-bearing layers” and “base-layer liquidity”. These are terms we will be seeing used more frequently. 

The eventual outcome of this decoupling is that transparency and proper disclosure are achieved, ensuring users (and builders) understand the risks associated with yield. Builders gain clearer pathways to design compliant products, while investors know exactly what they’re getting into. 

Predictability provides the confidence and trust to attract substantial capital, while the U.S. taking this unique stance could inspire a great deal of domestic innovation and leadership. Sure, there will be implementation challenges and friction ahead, but this is a real moment of maturation for crypto in the U.S. 

A new dawn of certainty

Experts generally echo positive sentiment about this change. Forbes, for example, has lauded the acts for providing much-needed clarity, reducing “jurisdictional turf wars,” and setting the stage for institutional engagement. Paul Grewal, Chief Legal Officer at Coinbase, noted:

“GENIUS is now the law of the land. Coinbase and crypto policy across the industry are committed to sensible rules for stablecoins and got it done. It’s been a good day.” 

Ji Hun Kim, President and Acting Chief Executive Officer, Crypto Council for Innovation, stated that the GENIUS Act “includes important consumer protections, such as segregating customer funds, bankruptcy procedures, addressing conflicts of interest, and requiring risk disclosures of operation, ownership, and structure. We strongly support these requirements that would protect consumers and their funds.”

These powerful regulatory design signals are confidently reshaping digital assets, compelling necessary separations and modularity. Ultimately, they encourage much-needed innovation of the liquidity and yield-bearing layers by legally protecting them and their architectures. The Gensler era is over, as the GENIUS era begins.

Andrei Grachev

Andrei Grachev is the managing partner of DWF Labs, a new-generation web3 investor and one of the world’s largest high-frequency trading entities in the digital asset space. Under his leadership, DWF Labs operates across more than 60 top exchanges, executing sophisticated trading strategies in both spot and derivatives markets, while actively investing in and supporting web3 projects globally. Andrei is also the managing partner of Falcon Finance, a next-generation synthetic dollar protocol. Falcon’s flagship asset, USDf, is an overcollateralized synthetic dollar backed by diversified crypto and real-world assets. Built for sustainable yield and capital preservation, Falcon combines transparency, institutional-grade risk management, and composability, setting a new standard for synthetic finance in a regulated future. Known for his deep understanding of market dynamics, infrastructure development, and digital asset economics, Andrei sits at the intersection of crypto finance and long-term ecosystem building. His work continues to shape the global conversation around stablecoins, synthetic assets, and the evolution of on-chain capital markets.



Source link

August 24, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Pay rises, AI regulation, and layoff protection: what Activision Blizzard's newly unionised employees want from Microsoft
Game Updates

Pay rises, AI regulation, and layoff protection: what Activision Blizzard’s newly unionised employees want from Microsoft

by admin August 22, 2025


Last week, Activision Blizzard’s Story and Franchise Development team (SFD) announced to the world it had unionised alongside the Communications Workers of America (CWA). As of writing, a neutrality agreement is in place while negotiations for a union contract are in the works.

It is not the first time the push for unionisation has surged at Activision Blizzard. Three months ago the Overwatch team unionised, 500 staff from the World of Warcraft team unionised last year, and Raven Software recently ratified its first union contract.

But as yet another wave of layoffs have been made at the company as part of Microsoft’s massive cuts across its gaming studios, this push for employee representation appears more necessary than ever.

To find out more about this next stage in Blizzard’s unionisation efforts, as well as what those at the SFD department want, I talked to two recently unionised Blizzard employees about what’s next for the team going forward.

Check out the new World of Warcraft cinematic here!Watch on YouTube

“The industry has had a lot of instability over the last few years, studios have been hit with layoffs, closures, game cancellations. I feel like it’s the most profitable entertainment sector in the world, and the people who work in it should have a piece of that and some stability to their working conditions.”

That was Alison Venato, video editor on the SFD team and one of many people responsible for Activision Blizzard’s incredibly popular cinematics across Overwatch and Diablo. The team and her have found themselves at the centre of a seemingly ever-shifting company in recent years, where it has proven hard to find stability.

“There’s been a lot of leadership changes over the past few years,” states Veneto, “and we feel like getting a union contract will give us some stability no matter what shake-ups happen at the company. We’ve had others that have unionised on the Warcraft and Overwatch teams, and we’ve had a wave of layoffs hit us since the Microsoft acquisition.

“We understand companies need to make money, but we were bought in the largest tech acquisition of all time, so obviously we have value. Our union can work with the leadership to create a situation that’s beneficial to everyone.”

Microsoft spent $75.4b on Activision Blizzard, for Call of Duty, World of Warcraft, and more. | Image credit: Activision

Sammi Kay, associate producer at Blizzard SFD, shares Venato’s desire to protect the developer’s ability to create the excellent work, without fear of reprisal from an industry disconnected from the realities of modern day video game development

“The industry has been expanding quite rapidly, especially since the pandemic when everyone was playing video games – myself included,” she said. “There’s a disconnect between what the companies and leadership are expecting from the industry and the workers who are developing that content.”

Kay elaborates on the feeling of the developers on the ground at Blizzard: “Everyone at Blizzard who has had a long tenure here enjoys the team, and there’s this sentiment that Blizzard is a special place. Things have changed due to many factors, including the pandemic, and the age of Blizzard as a company and it evolving, including with the acquisition by Microsoft. We’re unionising because we’re attached to how special Blizzard is […] We want to protect what we have and make it better.”

There’s a lot of love for Blizzard games, even after all this time. | Image credit: Blizzard.

So what do the folks at the SFD department want? Many concerns shared by those recently unionised at Blizzard are similar to those expressed elsewhere in the industry. Namely the issues of pay, AI regulation, and layoff protections.

“Everyone is talking about the same issues,” expressed Veneto. “Pay is always an issue – we live in Irvine which is always expensive. Layoff protections are important given the waves of layoffs [we’ve seen]. Work from home policies are very important to people, and AI obviously is having a huge impact. Plus, we’ve had things that were outsourced that we’d rather have in-house.

Then there’s the “big issue” of transparency, a key demand for those who feel ambushed by years of sudden changes. “A lot of decisions are made about pay and promotions that we have no insight into. So just having some more information there is key. For me and other people in SFD we’re all doing creative work, and a lot of these problems make it hard to be creative. A more stable environment where we have a contract that allows us to do this would be great […] I want to work with the best people on the best work.”

World of Warcraft’s story is in the midset of a major overhaul, deep into the trilogy of expansions that started with The War Within. | Image credit: Blizzard

As for Kay, while they are hesitant to speak on behalf of the whole department, AI regulation and pay are at the top of their list: “For me I would hope for better pay rises that keep pace or ahead of inflation,” they said. “More considerations with the use of AI, what that means as a tool for us at SFD and its implications moving forward. I think there’s very specific discussions on that for those in SFD in particular that should happen. I think it would be prudent to negotiate what layoff protections look like as well as severance packages.”

However, given Kay’s background in film and TV prior to Blizzard, they’re keen to avoid the temp-worker-focused dynamic found in other entertainment industries. “Having gone from contract work to full time was wonderful, and I want that opportunity to be available for more people,” they said. “From discussions I’ve had, there’s movement towards more contract roles being the norm, and that’s not in the best interest of Blizzard and its employees.”

Ultimately it’s a big win for the SFD team, and another blow landed in the ongoing fight for unionisation in the video game industry. With layoffs and closures happening at an alarming rate, one can only hope negotiations go well for all involved.

So how good a shot does the SFD department have at getting what they want, and what’s the deal with what certainly feels like a growing push for unionisation in the video game industry? To find more, I spoke to Scott Alsworth from the UK’s IWGB Union.

He credits the increase in unionisation efforts to several factors: technological displacement (especially poignant with the push for AI), a greater number of working class people joining the video game industry who bring a greater awareness of unionisation, and a response to the state of the industry as a whole.

The UVWCWA is one such union that has seen a surge of members, including the Blizzard SFD team. | Image credit: Communications Workers of America

“People are angry,” said Alsworth “The feeling in the industry is one of frustration. The biggest factor to the growth in unionisation is a widespread response to mass layoffs across the industry. Everybody knows someone who has been impacted, and people see unions as insurance and a way to help them keep their job, or at least a way to get extra help if they’re made redundant.

“It’s a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy,” he continued “Once unions are there people start joining and you gain momentum. When I’m talking to people about joining a union there are two reasons: the first a basic self preservation, what a union can do for me. The second is a desire to see the industry change, not just for themselves, but for workers everywhere.”

So what sort of protections can be gained? It depends on whether or not the union is recognised by the company in question. But even before any new contract is signed, the SFD department forming a union provides valuable resources.

“In the case of a large-scale layoff, what we can do is make sure the studio is doing things by the book,” said Alsworth “You’d be surprised how many studios cut corners and don’t do things like they’re supposed to do. At IWGB we have a great legal team, and that’s a great resource for us. I can safely say that in a number of cases, things like labour laws haven’t been adhered to. Once we raise that with our legal team, the studio gets spooked and you start to see concessions.”

Then of course as a collective the union has have options like strike action which becomes feasible to organise while unionised, better access to information and council in regard to contracts and an individual’s rights as a worker, and so on. Even as negotiations are in their early stages, the Blizzard SFD department has gained a few tools for its tool belt.

So the decision to unionise is a great first step for those at Activision Blizzard seeking better working conditions. Getting a proper contract in place, getting recognition from the company and solidifying a place within the legendary developer will surely be a hard and arduous process. But it’s a process many are eager to engage in, especially at a time when instability is becoming the norm in an industry gaining a reputation for its troubled nature.



Source link

August 22, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Representation of AI
Gaming Gear

The U.S. is blocking state AI regulation. Here’s what that means for every business

by admin August 18, 2025



Congress didn’t just reshape tax codes with the “One Big Beautiful” bill; it also quietly reshaped the future of artificial intelligence. A lesser-known provision of the sweeping legislation is now on its way to becoming law: a 10-year freeze on state-level AI regulation.

In other words, no individual state can pass rules that govern how businesses develop or use AI systems. The message is clear for companies rushing to embed AI in daily operations: govern yourselves or risk learning the hard way why guardrails matter.

Nichole Windholz

Social Links Navigation

AI isn’t a side project anymore. It’s already embedded in cybersecurity platforms, CRMs, internal chat tools, reporting dashboards and customer-facing products. Even mid-size organizations are training AI models on proprietary data to speed up everything from supplier selection to contract analysis.


You may like

However, the adoption curve has outpaced internal checks. Many teams are greenlighting tools without understanding how they were trained, what data they retain or how outputs are validated. IT leaders often discover AI use well after it’s already operational. This kind of shadow Ai creates a major risk surface.

And now, with state-level oversight blocked for a decade, there’s no outside pressure forcing organizations to establish policies or baseline rules. This shift pushes businesses to take even more responsibility for what happens inside their walls.

Without guardrails, AI can drift; fast

AI models aren’t static. Once deployed, they learn from new data, interact with systems and influence decision-making. That’s powerful but also unpredictable.

Left unchecked, an AI-driven forecasting tool might rely too heavily on outdated patterns, causing overproduction or supply chain bottlenecks. A chatbot designed to streamline customer service could unintentionally generate biased or off-brand responses.

Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!

Meanwhile, generative models trained on sensitive business documents can inadvertently expose proprietary information in future prompts. For example, a study released in January 2025 found that nearly 1 in 10 prompts used by business users when interacting with generative AI (GenAI) tools could inadvertently disclose sensitive data.

These aren’t abstract dangers; they’ve already appeared in public incidents. But it’s not just PR damage that’s at stake. AI errors can affect revenue, data security and even legal exposure. The absence of regulatory pressure doesn’t make these issues go away – it makes them easier to miss until they’re too big to ignore.

The smart play is internal governance: before you need it

Organizations are eager to integrate GenAI, with many teams already using these powerful tools in daily operations. This rapid adoption means that just passively monitoring things isn’t enough; a strong governance structure is crucial, one that can adapt as AI becomes more central to the business.

Setting up an internal AI governance council, ideally with leaders from IT, security, compliance and operations, offers that vital framework. This council isn’t there to stop innovation. Its job is to bring clarity. It typically reviews AI tools before they’re rolled out, sets clear usage policies and works with teams so they fully understand the benefits and limits of the AI they’re using.

This approach reduces unauthorized tool usage, makes auditing more efficient and helps leadership steer AI strategy with confidence. However, for governance to be effective, it must be integrated into broader enterprise systems, not siloed in spreadsheets or informal chats.

GRC platforms can anchor AI governance

Governance, risk and compliance (GRC) platforms already help businesses manage third-party risk, policy enforcement, incident response and internal audits. They’re now emerging as critical infrastructure for AI governance as well.

By centralizing policies, approvals and audit trails, GRC platforms help organizations track where AI is being used, which data sources are feeding it, and how outputs are monitored over time. They also create a transparent, repeatable process for teams to propose, evaluate and deploy AI tools with oversight so innovation doesn’t become improvisation.

Don’t count on vendors to handle it for you

Many tools advertise AI features with a sense of built-in safety, which includes privacy settings, explainable models and compliance-ready dashboards. But too often, the details are left up to the user.

If a vendor-trained model fails, your team will likely bear the operational and reputational costs. Businesses can’t afford to treat third-party AI as “set and forget.” Even licensed tools must be governed internally, especially if they’re learning from company data or making process-critical decisions.

The bottom line

With the U.S. blocking states from setting their own rules, many assumed federal regulation would follow quickly. However, the reality is more complicated. Draft legislation exists, but timelines are fuzzy, and political support is mixed.

In the meantime, every organization using AI is effectively writing its own rulebook. That’s a challenge and an opportunity, especially for companies that want to build trust, avoid missteps and confidently lead.

The organizations that define their governance now will have fewer fire drills later. They’ll also be better prepared for whatever federal rules eventually arrive because their internal structure won’t need a last-minute overhaul.

Because whether or not rules are enforced externally, your business still depends on getting AI right.

We’ve featured the best business plan software.

This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro’s Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro



Source link

August 18, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (1,098)
  • Esports (800)
  • Game Reviews (769)
  • Game Updates (906)
  • GameFi Guides (1,058)
  • Gaming Gear (960)
  • NFT Gaming (1,079)
  • Product Reviews (960)

Recent Posts

  • Final Fantasy 7 Remake and Rebirth finally available as physical double pack on PS5
  • The 10 Most Valuable Cards
  • The Far Lands! Over 14 years later, the edge of a Minecraft world has been reached
  • Mad Max Director George Miller Makes Silly Pro-AI Comments
  • Indiana Jones and the Great Circle gets New Game Plus and new ending in update celebrating MachineGames anniversary

Recent Posts

  • Final Fantasy 7 Remake and Rebirth finally available as physical double pack on PS5

    October 10, 2025
  • The 10 Most Valuable Cards

    October 10, 2025
  • The Far Lands! Over 14 years later, the edge of a Minecraft world has been reached

    October 10, 2025
  • Mad Max Director George Miller Makes Silly Pro-AI Comments

    October 10, 2025
  • Indiana Jones and the Great Circle gets New Game Plus and new ending in update celebrating MachineGames anniversary

    October 10, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • Final Fantasy 7 Remake and Rebirth finally available as physical double pack on PS5

    October 10, 2025
  • The 10 Most Valuable Cards

    October 10, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close