Tag:

Quantum

Quantum computers could bring lost Bitcoin back to life: Here’s how

by admin October 3, 2025

What is quantum technology?

Quantum technology can process an enormous amount of data and solve complex problems in seconds rather than decades.

Remarkably, quantum technology first appeared in the early 1900s. It originated from quantum mechanics, a branch of physics that examines how matter and energy behave at extremely small scales, such as atoms and subatomic particles.

In the real world, it’s applied in modern technologies such as transistors, lasers, MRI machines and quantum computers. These are said to be 300,000 times faster and more powerful than the ones used nowadays. Google’s new quantum chip, Willow, cuts computation times significantly and may provide hackers with the tools to unlock the algorithms that support Bitcoin and other cryptos.

Quantum computers could threaten Bitcoin’s cryptographic systems, including the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA). Experts such as Adam Back and Michael Saylor argue that quantum threats to Bitcoin aren’t a concern at present because such applications require advanced quantum hardware, which may take years, if not decades, to develop.

Research and development of quantum computers is running at a fast pace, but is Bitcoin quantum-safe at this stage? Not yet, but developers are working to upgrade the network to mitigate possible quantum risks, including breaking encryption.

While it’s important to acknowledge the risks, it’s also essential to clarify that these are far from being actual threats for now.

Did you know? Albert Einstein made significant contributions to the development of quantum technology. He set the ground for quantum mechanics with his work on the photoelectric effect, which revealed what light is made of. He won the Nobel Prize for this, and not for the relativity theory, as many believe.

How quantum tech could break Bitcoin wallets

Quantum computing could significantly impact Bitcoin. This is mainly because it could undermine the cryptography that protects its network.

Quantum computing and Bitcoin (BTC) have been a hot topic for a while, and rightly so. It can disrupt the network and potentially break Bitcoin wallets by exploiting vulnerabilities in the asymmetric cryptography that secures them. Specifically, the ECDSA, the asymmetric cryptography used in Bitcoin, is vulnerable to attacks by quantum computers.

Bitcoin wallets are secured by ECDSA to generate a pair of private-public keys. Its security relies on the hard-to-solve elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem (ECDLP), which is impossible to resolve with classical computers.

Bitcoin private key cracking with quantum computers is the real issue since private keys control your Bitcoin. If you lose them, you lose your money. When a private-public key pair is generated, the public key is set for verification, and the private key is for signing.

In 1994, mathematician Peter Shor created the Shor quantum algorithm, which can break the perceived security of the algorithms in asymmetric cryptography. All existing algorithms would require a huge amount of time, money and resources to derive a private key from the public key. However, the Shor algorithm will accelerate the process.

This means that when a person, organization or anyone with a strong quantum computer will be able to use the Shor algorithm, they may generate a private key from a public one and fake digital signatures for transactions.

Bitcoin and quantum security risk

You’ve learned by now that quantum tech could compromise Bitcoin wallets by revealing their private keys. This risk becomes more significant as quantum computers advance, especially for wallets linked to older addresses or those with reused public keys. Quantum computing could make it possible to reverse-engineer private keys from these exposed public keys, threatening the security of Bitcoin holders.

In 2025, quantum computers are supposedly decades away from breaking ECDSA. Even Michael Saylor believes the concerns to be unjustified. Bitcoin users can sit back and relax for now, but they should be aware of the best practices to handle any future quantum threats to Bitcoin.

Here’s a concise breakdown of the relationship between quantum computing and Bitcoin:

Did you know? Quantum computing progress can be assessed by the number of qubits (basic units of information) in one processor. Today, the most powerful quantum computers process between 100 and 1,000 qubits. Estimates for the number of qubits needed to break Bitcoin’s security range from 13 million to 300 million or more.

Can quantum computers recover lost Bitcoin?

Analysts think that between 2.3 million and 3.7 million Bitcoin is permanently lost. This is about 11%-18% of the total fixed supply of 21 million.

What happens to lost Bitcoin when quantum recovery technologies allow dormant wallets to come back to life? Think of Satoshi Nakamoto’s coins alone, which are estimated to be 1 million. If a quantum computer cracks their wallet and releases the coins into circulation, it could lead to big market swings.

Quantum computers might bring back that lost Bitcoin by cracking the cryptographic keys that protect those wallets. These are usually wallets with lost or hard-to-reach private keys, making them easy targets.

These are likely the oldest versions of Bitcoin addresses, using pay-to-public-key (P2PK) formats, which have never been upgraded or reused. As a result, these addresses remain vulnerable, with no one alive or available to update them. The advancement of quantum computing could potentially exploit these vulnerabilities, unlocking dormant wallets.

In May 2025, global asset manager and technology provider BlackRock added a warning to its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) filing, stating that quantum computing poses a significant risk to Bitcoin’s long-term security due to its ability to break current cryptographic defenses.

Ethical and economic implications

Recovering lost Bitcoin may raise some economic and ethical implications. Reintroducing those coins into circulation could disrupt Bitcoin’s scarcity attribute, and consequently, its market value could be impacted.

There are already talks on the best ways to preserve Bitcoin’s economic and ethical value. Many, like OG Bitcoin expert Jameson Lopp, believe those coins should be burned and destroyed forever to protect the network; others believe they should be redistributed for wealth balance.

What can you do to protect your Bitcoin?

Minimizing the public key exposure is essential if you want to protect your Bitcoin. Simple measures can help users find greater peace of mind.

Measures to protect your Bitcoin should always be taken into consideration, regardless of the quantum threats. Fraud is a perennial threat in crypto. Phishing is still one of the most common scams in crypto, with the new zero-value scam revealed, where a phony address is added to the transaction history of a targeted wallet.

When the owner starts a transaction, they may simply choose an address from their history and pick the fraudulent one, without even needing to access a private key.

Approximately 25% of all Bitcoin is stored in addresses that use pay-to-public-key (P2PK) or reused pay-to-public-key-hash (P2PKH). These methods often reveal the public key linked to a user’s address. This is where the crypto vulnerabilities to quantum computing are more clear since the exposed public keys are more prone to quantum attacks through the Shor algorithm.

You can do this by simply avoiding address reuse. Join a platform that helps your wallet change addresses automatically with each transaction. Reusing an address can expose your public key during a transaction.

The best you can do is generate new addresses for each transaction and use wallets that support Taproot and SegWit. Don’t forget to pay special attention when you’re sending transactions to your wallet’s addresses. These wallets provide addresses with better security.

Address poisoning is another type of common phishing technique that has cost users millions of dollars. It happens when bad actors send small transactions from wallet addresses similar to victims’ legitimate ones, thereby deceiving them by making them copy the wrong address when executing future transactions.

Bitcoin’s quantum resistance: Ongoing research and safety measures

Bitcoin remains resilient against quantum threats for now, with ongoing research into quantum-resistant wallets and protocols like QRAMP to protect its future, while experts explore ways quantum technology could enhance the network.

Bitcoin is decentralized and open-source. Its network adapts well, and ongoing research into quantum-resistant Bitcoin wallets suggests that coins face no immediate threat.

Users should follow best practices, like not reusing addresses, to stay safe until quantum-proof cryptocurrencies and wallets are fully ready and available for use.

Among the initial measures to protect Bitcoin from quantum threats, Bitcoin developer Agustin Cruz proposed a quantum-resistant asset mapping protocol (QRAMP) in early 2025. It is meant to protect Bitcoin from quantum risks while also allowing Bitcoin to work crosschain, extending to other blockchains without compromising custody or supply limits.

Also, experts are developing powerful quantum-resistant cryptographic techniques, which could benefit Bitcoin in several ways. It may improve scalability, create unhackable wallets and strengthen cryptography. These changes will help the Bitcoin network stay strong and thrive in a new quantum world.

Source link

October 3, 2025 0 comments

Gaming Gear

Researchers Claim First ‘Unconditional Proof’ of Quantum Advantage. What Happens Next?

by admin October 2, 2025

Quantum computers are already here, even though it’s not readily apparent. Now, researchers say quantum advantage—the field’s long-promised milestone of outperforming classical computers—appears to have finally arrived. But the story comes with an important caveat.

Research by scientists at the University of Texas at Austin and Colorado computing firm Quantinuum devised and carried out an experiment that demonstrates “unconditional” quantum advantage, sometimes referred to as quantum supremacy. As the researchers phrased it, their “result is provable and permanent: no future development in classical algorithms can close this gap.” The preprint, which has yet to be peer reviewed, was made available on arXiv earlier this month.

Gizmodo reached out to several experts in the field, who affirmed the new results. They added that the experiment, while commendable, isn’t the most practical use of a quantum computer—which already gets flak for its uselessness to everyday users.

Then again, “quantum advantage” is a weird, surprisingly malleable concept with many possible applications. Overall, the results are definitely worth a closer look.

Alice and Bob make a cameo

Quantum enthusiasts may be familiar with Alice and Bob, two fictional characters often summoned for quantum thought experiments. In the context of the new experiment, Alice and Bob are two researchers collaborating on a computation using a single device. They receive different inputs at different points in time, but only Alice can send Bob a message, and not the other way around. Based on Alice’s message, Bob must decide how to measure and interpret to produce a final output.

A simplified diagram representing the experimental setup. © Kretschmer et al., 2025

According to the paper, “the use of a quantum message can provably reduce the amount of communication required by an exponential factor compared to any protocol that uses classical communication alone.” In other words, a small quantum message can replace a much larger classical one. To prove their point, the team repeated the experiment 10,000 times on Quantinuum’s H1-1 trapped-ion quantum computers, coupled with a careful mathematical validation of their protocol.

Surprisingly, they found that a quantum computer only needed 12 qubits (qubits are the smallest unit of information for quantum computers) to solve this problem. By contrast, even the most efficient classical computers needed 330 bits.

A different way to play the game

“This is a very different type of quantum advantage than we have seen before—not better or worse, but it’s just proving something completely different from past experiments,” Bill Fefferman, a computer scientist at the University of Chicago, told Gizmodo in an email. Fefferman previously collaborated with senior author Scott Aaronson but wasn’t involved in the new study.

Fefferman explained that scientists typically equate quantum advantage to “striving to perform a computation on a quantum computer that can be solved dramatically faster than any classical computer.” By contrast, the new experiment achieves “quantum information supremacy,” in which the focus isn’t so much on speed as it is on using fewer qubits to solve a problem that classical computers need many more bits to crack.

“It is true that their result is unconditional, in the sense that it doesn’t rely on unproven assumptions,” Fefferman said. “This is, of course, a great feature of this new experiment, but it’s also inherited by this ‘moving of the goalposts.’”

Gizmodo contacted the study’s authors, who said they couldn’t comment until the paper is formally published.

Pressing the advantage

The results raise questions about the broader goals of proving quantum advantage. As IBM Quantum’s director told Gizmodo in a previous interview, a potential answer is to ask how quantum computers can enhance computing problems we’re already familiar with.

IBM’s Quantum System Two installed at the RIKEN Center for Computational Science in Kobe, Japan. © IBM

But as Fefferman noted, there isn’t necessarily a better or worse approach for arriving at quantum advantage—although this “goalpost” appears to be the holy grail for the field’s struggle to prove its worth.

That may be a product of quantum computing’s history, Giuseppe Carleo, a computational physicist at EPFL in Switzerland who wasn’t involved in the new work, explained to Gizmodo in a video call. The rapid growth of quantum computing makes it easy to forget how recently the right hardware became available to test theory.

“So the field has developed historically in the past 20, 30 years much closer to mathematics, rather than an applied field where, if you want, you can use a machine to run things,” said Carleo, who spoke with Gizmodo about the history of quantum computing. As a result, most of the analysis in the field remained at theoretical levels for a longer time than scientists would’ve hoped.

But with hardware advances and a fast-growing industry, this trend is gradually shifting—as it should, Carleo said. More projects are moving away from designing quantum advantage experiments “specifically tailored to show advantage,” he said, turning instead to places where quantum computers can help, not necessarily upend.

That’s actually closer to the field’s “origins,” he added. Richard Feynman, the physicist instrumental to quantum computing’s foundations, suggested that quantum computers should predict quantum phenomena. Sure, there might not be so much “money attached to it,” but they are “of tremendous interest for theoretical physics,” particularly with regard to fundamental questions about our universe, Carleo explained.

Quantum-anything never makes it easy

The new experiment might struggle to prove its immediate connection to practicality. But in a way, the preprint does adhere to Feynman’s advice. It’s certainly a theoretically robust demonstration of using quantum hardware to investigate quantum concepts.

At this very moment, that makes it seem detached from reality. Then again, when has anything quantum ever given easy answers? Yet, if science history is any guide, the best discoveries come from the most unexpected, seemingly impractical pursuits. We’ll just have to keep watch.

Source link

October 2, 2025 0 comments

GameFi Guides

First Bitcoiner in Space Says BTC Will Survive Quantum Computing

by admin September 29, 2025

Focusing on interplanetarization
Historic space mission

F2Pool co-founder Chun Wang, who is known as the first Bitcoiner to travel to space, is convinced that the fears of quantum computing breaking Bitcoin are overblown.

“It turns out those who are panicking about quantum computers may wipe out Bitcoin have never written a single line of quantum code,” Wang quipped.

Focusing on interplanetarization

As reported by U.Today, recent advancements within the quantum computing space have led to persistent concerns about the viability of Bitcoin’s SHA-256 hashing algorithm.

Google’s Willow, Microsoft’s Majorana 1 and IBM’s Blue Jay projects show that the newfangled technology is moving forward despite remaining somewhat obscure and lacking virtually any real-world use cases that could show off its actual potential.

You Might Also Like

Recently, Tesla CEO Elon Musk specifically asked Grok, an AI chatbot developed by xAI, to estimate the probability of SHA-256 being cracked.

However, Wang is convinced that quantum computers still will not have cracked Bitcoin by the time humans actually settle on Mars. “Instead of wasting time worrying about quantum computing, it makes far more sense to think about how to make Bitcoin latency-tolerant, so it can serve an interplanetary civilization,” he said.

Wang has specifically stressed that he wants Bitcoin to assume the role of the interplanetary settlement currency instead of some “fleeting” altcoins.

Historic space mission

As reported by U.Today, Wang traveled to space as part of the Fram2 mission, flying over the Earth’s pole alongside three other crew members.

During the mission, the crew conducted a total of 22 scientific experiments, which included performing X-rays in space for the first time.

Source link

September 29, 2025 0 comments

NFT Gaming

Caltech Builds World’s Largest Neutral-Atom Quantum Computer

by admin September 29, 2025

In brief

Caltech trapped 6,100 cesium atoms as qubits, the largest neutral-atom quantum system to date.
Qubits stayed coherent for 13 seconds with 99.98% operational accuracy, defying scaling trade-offs.
The team moved atoms across the array while keeping them in superposition.

Caltech physicists have created the largest neutral-atom quantum computer to date, trapping 6,100 cesium atoms as qubits in a single array. The result, published in Nature on Thursday, represents a significant increase over previous arrays, which contained only hundreds of qubits.

Researchers scaled their system from the hundreds of qubits typical in past experiments to more than 6,000, while maintaining stability and precision at levels needed for practical machines.

The team said it achieved coherence times of about 13 seconds—nearly 10 times longer than past experiments—while performing single-qubit operations with 99.98% accuracy.

A qubit, or quantum bit, is the fundamental unit of information in a quantum computer. Unlike a classical bit—which can be either a 0 or 1—a qubit can exist in a superposition of both states at once, allowing it to perform many calculations in parallel. The challenge is keeping that delicate state stable long enough to run computations.

That stability is called “coherence,” and it’s constantly threatened by noise, heat, or stray electromagnetic fields. The longer a qubit remains coherent, the more complex and reliable the operations a quantum processor can perform before errors creep in.

“This is an exciting moment for neutral-atom quantum computing,” Caltech professor of physics and principal investigator on the project, Manuel Endres, said in a statement. “We can now see a pathway to large error-corrected quantum computers. The building blocks are in place.”

However, according to Caltech graduate student Elie Bataille, who worked on the project, the amount of time is only one factor in the quantum process.

“What you need is a very long coherence time compared to the duration of your operations,” Bataille told Decrypt. “If your operations are one microsecond and you have a second of coherence time, that means you can do about a million operations.”

Scaling without sacrificing fidelity

The researchers used “optical tweezers,” which are highly focused beams of light, to grab and position individual atoms. By splitting a single laser into 12,000 of these tiny light traps, they were able to hold 6,100 atoms steady inside a vacuum chamber.

“If you use a laser at the right wavelength, you can make the light attractive for the atom, creating a trap,” Bataille said. “If you confine your beam of light to a very small dot, about a micrometer, you can attract and trap many atoms.”

The team showed they could move atoms around within the array without breaking their fragile quantum state, known as superposition. That ability to shift qubits while keeping them stable could make it easier to correct errors in future quantum computers.

Neutral-atom quantum systems are gaining attention as viable competitors to superconducting circuits and trapped-ion platforms. One of their unique advantages is physical reconfigurability: atoms can be rearranged during a computation using mobile optical traps, which gives dynamic connectivity that rigid hardware topologies struggle to match. So far, most neutral‐atom arrays have contained only hundreds of qubits, making Caltech’s 6,100-qubit milestone a major step forward.

A global race

The result arrives as companies and labs worldwide scale up quantum machines. IBM has pledged a 100,000-qubit superconducting computer by 2033, while firms like IonQ and QuEra are developing ion-trap and neutral-atom approaches. Colorado-based Quantinuum aims to deliver a fully fault-tolerant quantum computer by 2029.

The next milestone is demonstrating error correction at scale, which will require encoding logical qubits from thousands of physical ones. That is critical if quantum computers are to solve practical problems in chemistry, materials, and beyond.

“A traditional computer makes one error every 10 to 17 operations,” Bataille said. “A quantum computer is nowhere near that accurate, and we don’t expect to reach that level with hardware only.”

The Caltech team plans to link qubits through entanglement, a necessary step for running full-scale quantum computations.

While Caltech’s 6,100-qubit array does not yet deliver a practical quantum computer, by combining scale, accuracy, and coherence in one system, it sets a new benchmark and strengthens the case for neutral atoms as a leading platform in quantum computing.

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.

Source link

September 29, 2025 0 comments

Crypto Trends

Satoshi’s Bitcoin Holdings at Risk? Quantum Computing Advances

by admin September 26, 2025

Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, is believed to hold an estimated 1.096 million BTC, according to Arkham data. Satoshi’s wallet, which made all its holdings from mining the network in its earliest days, has remained untouched since 2010, when it was run on a few laptops.

Satoshi accumulated this Bitcoin, mining over 22,000 blocks between 2009 and 2010. He was one of the first few miners of Bitcoin, with block rewards nearing over 50 BTC at the time.

According to Arkham data, Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin stash is currently worth $119,640,092,296 ($119.64 billion) at a current Bitcoin price of $109,125.

With a current Bitcoin worth of $119.64 billion, Satoshi Nakamoto ranks among the wealthiest individuals on the planet, but none of the BTC has ever been moved.

Satoshi’s Bitcoin holdings’ fate predicted

Satoshi’s Bitcoin holdings, accumulated from early network mining, have been untouched since 2010, but recent concerns about Quantum computing seem to be shifting this narrative.

Satoshi’s coins will be market dumped. In 2-8 years Quantum will break Bitcoin. These are scientifically calculated timelines. We must upgrade Bitcoin NOW. We are running out of time.

What are you doing about it?

Come to my @token2049 talk: 10:45am, Wed 1 Oct!

“Thank you for… pic.twitter.com/b4GR3S4Qjc

— Charles Edwards (@caprioleio) September 26, 2025

In light of this, Capriole Fund Founder Charles Edwards speculates on what the fate of Satoshi coins might be: they could be market dumped.

As quantum computing continues to advance, timelines for when a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could crack modern encryption algorithms are emerging.

Edwards gives this timeline to be 2-8 years (which would be from 2027 to 2033), stating this range to be “scientifically calculated timelines.”

The timeline of when cryptocurrency encryption standards might be cracked by a sufficiently powerful quantum computer is causing debate among blockchain developers, as well as when migration to quantum-resistant cryptography must occur. Edwards indicated that the time to upgrade Bitcoin is now, as it is running out of time.

Source link

September 26, 2025 0 comments

Gaming Gear

Why One VC Thinks Quantum Is a Bigger Unlock Than AGI

by admin September 23, 2025

Depending on how you think about it, there’s half a dozen or more approaches to the hardware. And I became excited that within the hardware approach, the neutral atom approach was high potential. So we backed [Thompson’s] company called Logiqal.

What happens if you’re right?

I’m a venture investor, and we believe in convexity—taking risks on things that most likely won’t work, but if they do work could be 500x in value.

It’s a real earth-moving innovation if there’s a chance that quantum computers find the path toward success. You unlock these thinking engines, these computational engines that can run the future of material sciences, the future of pharmaceutical innovation, the future of logistics, the future of financial markets in ways that we’ve never seen before.

You can see a future where you could create pharmaceutical advancements that could elongate life 20 to 30 years. You could see changes in material sciences where we could invent new products. It could help us get to Mars! That is what quantum computing unlocks.

The way you talk about quantum computing sounds a lot like how many AI enthusiasts talk about artificial general intelligence.

In many ways, quantum is today where AI was back in 2015, which is a lot of really big research and science projects and starting to have practical applications rather than just pure research.

You mentioned that it’s hard to fake being a quantum expert. I would posit that it is not as hard to fake being an AI expert. How do you decide who to back?

There are so many companies that are being built and born in AI that when you extrapolate them 5, 10 years will not have a true genuine moat outside of brand or speed. Brand and speed are rarely strong enough moats to build a generational company.

I’ll give you an example. BrightAI creates stickers that are roughly this big [she makes a circle with her fist]. The company puts a sticker on every telephone pole, on every HVAC system, on every water line system, and then observes it for long periods of time, 5, 10, 15, 20 years [and flags potential issues]. That’s a pretty good moat. You’re not ripping all those stickers off.

For the most part, the value in AI accrues to the incumbents. Penny, my cofounder, is on the board of Microsoft. If you think about it, Microsoft and Google—Google has 3 billion users. Microsoft has a billion users. They can launch a product that is OK, not excellent, and they still have a pricing power, a distribution power. And so we very much think about the world where when the elephants dance. Don’t be an ant.

How do you use AI?

For everything. There’s nothing you don’t use AI for, nothing. From every question, I mean, today I probably used it 25 times.

It’s replaced Google for you?

Everything. Everything. Deep research, sourcing. Today I was looking up what jobs are declining fastest in the world. Truly, I would say it’s not a dozen times a day. It’s dozens of times a day.

This is an edition of the Model Behavior newsletter. Read previous newsletters here.

Source link

September 23, 2025 0 comments

Sentiment signals could spark the next rally

GameFi Guides

Bitcoin faces quantum risk: Solana co-founder issues warning

by admin September 21, 2025

Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko has warned that Bitcoin developers must prepare for a potential quantum computing breakthrough that could render the network’s current security measures outdated.

Summary

At the All-In Summit, Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko reignited debate over Bitcoin’s long-term security.
There’s a “50/50” chance that quantum computers could break its cryptographic defenses within five years. Rapid advances in AI show how quickly theory can become reality.
The question is not just if Bitcoin must migrate to quantum-safe cryptography—but when.

According to Yakovenko, who was speaking at the All-In Summit 2025, there is a “50/50” probability that within five years, quantum computers will be strong enough to crack the cryptographic safeguards protecting Bitcoin wallets.

The concern centers on quantum machines running algorithms like Shor’s, which could crack the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm currently protecting Bitcoin (BTC) private keys.

This would allow attackers to forge transactions and compromise wallets, creating an existential risk for the network.

Yakovenko argued that “we should migrate Bitcoin to a quantum-resistant signature scheme” before such technology becomes viable.

Skeptics like Blockstream’s Adam Back downplay immediacy of threat

The Bitcoin community remains divided on the urgency of quantum threats. Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, estimated that the technology is still relatively far away and argued that making Bitcoin quantum-ready is “relatively simple.”

Bitcoin Core contributor Peter Todd dismissed current quantum computers as non-existent, stating that “demos running toy problems do not count.”

Luke Dashjr, another Bitcoin Core contributor, suggested quantum threats pose less immediate danger than spam transactions and developer corruption issues the community currently faces.

Bitcoin’s design complicates any quantum upgrade. A migration to post-quantum cryptography would require a hard fork, a highly contentious and technically complex process needing widespread network support.

Yakovenko countered skepticism by pointing to quick AI advances as evidence of how quickly laboratory research can transition to real-world applications.

He suggested that when tech giants like Apple or Google deploy quantum-safe cryptographic stacks, “it’s time to migrate” Bitcoin’s security infrastructure.

Exposed keys create vulnerability

Bitcoin’s quantum vulnerability stems from two primary attack vectors. The network uses ECDSA based on the secp256k1 curve to secure private keys and validate transactions.

This makes it particularly vulnerable to Shor’s algorithm, which could derive private keys from public keys in polynomial time.

Approximately 25-30% of all Bitcoin, over 4 million BTC, including Satoshi Nakamoto’s early holdings, sits in addresses with exposed public keys.

These legacy Pay-to-Public-Key addresses are immediately vulnerable to quantum attack since their public keys are already visible on the blockchain.

Transaction windows create additional risk exposure. When Bitcoin users start transactions, they reveal public keys during the roughly 10-minute confirmation window.

A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could exploit this brief exposure to derive private keys and redirect funds before transactions confirm.

Source link

September 21, 2025 0 comments

NFT Gaming

Solana’s Yakovenko Says Bitcoin Must Upgrade to Survive Quantum Threat by 2030

by admin September 20, 2025

Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko warned that Bitcoin developers must act to prepare for a possible quantum computing breakthrough that could render the network’s current security measures obsolete.

Speaking at the All-In Summit 2025, Yakovenko said there’s a “50/50” chance quantum computers will be powerful enough within five years to break the cryptographic protections securing Bitcoin wallets.

“We should migrate Bitcoin to a quantum-resistant signature scheme,” he said.

The concern stems from the possibility of quantum machines running algorithms like Shor’s, which could crack the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm currently protecting Bitcoin private keys. That would make it possible to forge transactions and compromise wallets, an existential risk for the network.

Community pushback

Bitcoin’s design doesn’t make such a change easy. A migration to post-quantum cryptography would require a hard fork, a highly contentious and technically complex process that would need widespread support across the network and would not be backward-compatible.

While Yakovenko stressed urgency, others in the crypto community aren’t convinced the threat is near. Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, estimated that the technology is still somewhat far away and even making Bitcoin quantum-ready is “relatively simple.”

Bitcoin Core contributor Peter Todd pointed out earlier on social media that quantum computers “don’t exist” as “the demos running toy problems do not count.” To Luke Dashjr, another Bitcoin Core contributor, quantum isn’t as much of a threat to Bitcoin now as spam and developer corruption, which the community can now address.

Yakovenko argued that advances in artificial intelligence show how quickly lab work can leap into the real world. The moment tech giants like Apple or Google roll out quantum-safe cryptographic stacks, he said, “it’s time to migrate.”

Source link

September 20, 2025 0 comments

GameFi Guides

Solana Co-Founder Urges Bitcoin Community To Brace For Quantum Threat

by admin September 20, 2025

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Bitcoin’s security may need an upgrade sooner than many expect, according to Anatoly Yakovenko, co-founder of Solana.

Speaking at the All-In Summit 2025, Yakovenko warned there is roughly a 50/50 chance of a major quantum-computing breakthrough within the next five years and urged the Bitcoin community to start shifting to quantum-resistant signatures now.

Quantum Risk On A Short Timeline

According to reports, Yakovenko argued that advances in quantum hardware — helped along by rapid progress in AI — could reach a point where current cryptography used by Bitcoin becomes vulnerable by about 2030.

He recommended migrating away from Bitcoin’s existing signature scheme, ECDSA, toward algorithms designed to resist quantum attacks.

Bitcoin Uses Signatures That Could Be Targeted

Bitcoin transactions rely on ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm) to prove ownership.

Based on technical warnings from many researchers, a powerful enough quantum computer running algorithms such as Shor’s could, in theory, break those signatures and expose private keys tied to addresses that have revealed their public keys.

That is the vulnerability Yakovenko highlighted.

Experts Offer Mixed Timelines

Other voices in crypto put the timeline farther out. Reports show Adam Back of Blockstream thinks quantum machines that can threaten Bitcoin are likely decades away — he has cited a figure near 20 years.

Some figures, like Samson Mow, suggest a longer window as well, while newer commentators warn the risk could arrive much sooner if breakthroughs accelerate.

The split in views reflects real uncertainty about when — not whether — quantum will matter for blockchains.

BTCUSD trading at $115,989 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

What A Fix Would Mean In Practice

Moving Bitcoin to quantum-resistant signatures is possible, but it is not small work. Based on analysis across industry pieces, such a shift could require major protocol changes, widespread wallet updates, and careful rollout plans to avoid breaking existing addresses or exposing users during the transition.

Some proposals include one-time migration tools and new address types, but none is a simple flip of a switch.

On Action And Urgency

Based on reports, Yakovenko’s main point was urgency: begin testing and building a migration path now, not later.

He noted Bitcoin’s strengths but stressed that preparation would protect users and preserve trust if quantum capabilities arrive faster than many expect.

Industry coverage has already circulated his remarks, prompting renewed discussion across developer forums and research groups.

What Happens Next

For now, Bitcoin developers and node operators face a choice between steady, cautious research and faster, coordinated engineering to prepare for several possible futures.

Yakovenko’s estimate — a 50/50 chance in five years — is far from a consensus, but it has pushed the debate back into public view.

Featured image from Meta, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Source link

September 20, 2025 0 comments

GameFi Guides

Massive 300 Million XRP Injection, Bitcoin’s ‘Quantum Hack’ Theory, Shiba Inu (SHIB) 2025 Breakout Setup: Crypto News Digest

by admin September 10, 2025

XRP exchange reserves jump by 300 million tokens in 24 hours

XRP is back in the news after 300 million tokens, worth almost $885 million, were moved into crypto exchanges in just 24 hours. The surge lifted exchange reserves above $10.3 billion and set the stage for what may be a major price swing for the popular cryptocurrency.

Scale of inflows: 300,000,000 XRP entered exchanges in 24 hours, raising liquidity to multi-month highs.

Price reaction: XRP rebounded from $2.77 to $2.95 but has yet to break the $3.07 resistance.

Risk ahead: Extra supply on exchanges could tilt the balance toward selling pressure.

XRP’s position at the moment is tricky, to say the least. On the one hand, bouncing back from $2.77 and holding the 100-day EMA suggests that bulls are still in charge. But if there is fresh supply coming into exchanges, it might increase the risk of sell pressure if whales decide to offload.

What to watch out for next is the $3.07 barrier, which lines up with the 50-day EMA. Should it break, the path toward the $3.30-$3.50 region will open, and that is where selling picked up during previous rallies. If XRP does not clear that line, though, it risks falling back to $2.77, with the 200-day EMA at $2.53 acting as a deeper support “cushion.”

For now, with relative strength holding near the midline and trading volumes low, the market is waiting for confirmation of direction. It is pretty likely that there will be some volatility, but the endgame will depend on whether the reserves are used to aggressively sell or to keep as strategic liquidity.

You Might Also Like

Bitcoin faces “quantum threat” again, but it’s still only theory

The “FUD of the week” award goes to Josh Mandell, a former Wall Street trader, who caused a big stir in the crypto community, by saying that quantum computing is already being used to steal coins from old Bitcoin wallets.

Mandell’s claim: Quantum tech has apparently let a “big player” drain some long-dormant wallets.

Community reaction: Bitcoin analysts dismissed the idea as unrealistic and mocked the theory online.

Reality check: Breaking Bitcoin security still requires technology decades away.

What happened is that Mandell argued on X that stolen Bitcoin is being quietly accumulated off-market, with on-chain analysis as the only safeguard. However, experts immediately pushed back, stressing that the millions of qubits needed to break Bitcoin simply do not exist today.

In particular, security researchers like Harry Beckwith and Matthew Pines labeled the suggestion false, while other commentators openly ridiculed it.

There are some concerns in place as quantum computing is advancing — Microsoft and Google recently unveiled new chips — but specialists agree it will take decades before such machines could threaten Bitcoin’s encryption.

Some, like cypherpunk Jameson Lopp, still urge long-term preparation in case quantum attacks become feasible, but even he points to the distant horizon, not the present. For now, Bitcoin’s cryptography remains safe, according to common knowledge.

You Might Also Like

Shiba Inu’s (SHIB) 2025 breakout setup comes into focus

Being the biggest meme coin on Ethereum means always headlining the news, and Shiba Inu (SHIB) delivers. In today’s digest, the highlight is the fact that the meme cryptocurrency’s price is tightening inside a symmetrical triangle pattern, preparing for one of its biggest moves of the year.

Key resistance: The upside targets are defined by $0.00001297 (100-day EMA) and $0.00001388 (200-day EMA).

Support levels: The base is still at $0.00001200, but if SHIB loses that, it could be exposed to $0.00001150 and $0.00000950.

Indicators: The RSI is at 47 and falling, and there has been a bit of indecision before a breakout.

The way things are set up right now puts SHIB in a bit of a tricky position, just like XRP. The bullish scenario is that a breakout above $0.00001297 backed by strong volume drives Shiba Inu toward $0.00001450-$0.00001500, the same region where sellers capped the July rally. Clearing that ceiling shifts the broader picture back toward bullish control for the Shiba Inu coin.

Failure to defend $0.00001200, however, turns the structure bearish, exposing $0.00001150 per SHIB as the next stop and reopening the path down to $0.00000950, last touched in early summer. With RSI neutral and volume thinning, the pattern is nearly at its peak, and the outcome promises to be SHIB’s most significant move of 2025. Call it the potential Breakout of the Year.

You Might Also Like

Source link

September 10, 2025 0 comments