Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

Push

'I Hope They Push Us So Hard'
GameFi Guides

‘I Hope They Push Us So Hard’

by admin May 23, 2025


Anatoly Yakovenko, cofounder of Solana (SOL), has responded to Ryan Watkins’ post about the subtle Hyperliquid rivalry. In an update shared on X, Yakovenko acknowledged that competition in the crypto space has a transformative effect.

Solana founder advocates product-driven development over hype

Yakovenko’s comments suggest that Solana remains committed to prioritizing blockchain performance and user experience over hype.

Notably, Ryan Watkins implies that Hyperliquid and Solana are now competing head-to-head. The rivalry could be a crucial battle for dominance in bringing the U.S. equities market on-chain.

You Might Also Like

Interestingly, rather than dismissing competitors, Yakovenko welcomes the pressure and hopes that Hyperliquid does well enough to put more of a spotlight on Solana. According to him, this will force Solana to focus on product, engineering and revenue through actual usage.

The real competition that you pick or is picked for you will change you. Do I want to be changed by TVL numbers and monetary premium, or a laser focus on product and engineering and revenues?

I hope the hype guys do so well that they push the solana ecosystem to double down on… https://t.co/BzYdR8XaUM

— toly 🇺🇸 (@aeyakovenko) May 23, 2025

He maintained that Solana is not prioritizing the chase of Total Value Locked (TVL) or monetary premium figures.

“I hope the hype guys do so well that they push the Solana ecosystem to double down on the latter,” Yakovenko wrote.

This suggests that the industry should prioritize developing product-thinking approaches to drive development in the crypto space. Yakovenko is advocating a shift from speculative metrics like TVL that do not translate to sustainable growth.

SOL eyes $200 milestone amid market optimism

On the broader crypto market, Solana investors look forward to the asset’s price climbing to $200 on the back of the ongoing bullish run. As U.Today reported, Solana’s technical indicators show that attaining the $200 level remains achievable if the ecosystem supports the current momentum.

You Might Also Like

As of press time, the SOL price was trading at $182.74, representing a 2.29% increase in the last 24 hours. In earlier trading activity, Solana had reached a peak of $187.

Meanwhile, trading volume has increased slightly by 3.16% to $6.75 billion.

The coming days will determine Solana’s price trajectory. Can the ecosystem support its climb to $200 as it faces a crucial price test?





Source link

May 23, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Long live the tush push! The controversial play's top moments
Esports

Long live the tush push! The controversial play’s top moments

by admin May 22, 2025


  • Kalyn KahlerMay 21, 2025, 01:30 PM ET

    Close

      Kalyn Kahler is a senior NFL writer at ESPN. Kalyn reports on a range of NFL topics. She reported about the influence of coaching agents on NFL hiring and found out what current and former Cowboys players really think about the tour groups of fans that roam about The Star every day. Before joining ESPN in July of 2024, Kalyn wrote for The Athletic, Defector, Bleacher Report and Sports Illustrated. She began her career at Sports Illustrated as NFL columnist Peter King’s assistant. She is a graduate of Northwestern University, where she was a varsity cheerleader. In her free time, Kalyn takes Spanish classes and teaches Irish dance. You can reach out to Kalyn via email.

BILL SNYDER DOESN’T understand what all the fuss is about.

The legendary Kansas State coach, 85 years old and retired from coaching, can’t remember exactly what the Wildcats called the play because it was just an add-on to a sneak. He didn’t — and still doesn’t — think it was very innovative or creative.

Editor’s Picks

2 Related

“It was just a natural thing to do,” he told ESPN of the play that would become known as the “tush push” and eventually inspire a raging NFL-wide debate. “We need to create a way in which we could take the shortest distance to get the short distance we needed to go and not get held up, because everybody put all the people over there, so we wanted to compete against no matter how many people you put there. We wanted to be strong enough not to get held up at the line of scrimmage. And we would bring one or two, or on occasion, three backs up right off of the hip of the center, and on the snap of the ball, we would push the center or push the back of the quarterback.”

Snyder said he’s not aware of anyone running the play before his Wildcats teams, who added the play soon after 2013, when pushing became legal in college football. His offensive coordinator, Dana Dimel, took the concept with him to UTEP when he became head coach there in 2018 and experimented with running fake sneaks off of it. (Dimel died in 2023.) Snyder said that sometimes opposing coaches would complain to officials during games but that it never went further than that because the play was within the rules. He said he has never heard from any NFL coaches about it. He’s not sure the Eagles even knew he was running the play years before they were, and he certainly doesn’t believe it was special enough to warrant such attention.

“It was like any other play,” Snyder said. “It was just a play in our repertoire, and that’s what we did on certain occasions, and we didn’t treat it any differently than any other play that we had.”

But that’s not how the league office or a majority of NFL owners look at the play. For cited reasons including health and safety and pace of play, a large group of teams that believes pushing has no place in football attempted to ban the tush push. Those efforts came up short, with 10 teams voting down the efforts to ban it Wednesday.

Although what was likely the first tush push took place in Manhattan, Kansas, Eagles coach and former Colts OC Nick Sirianni has credited Eagles offensive line coach Jeff Stoutland, former Colts head coach and Eagles assistant Frank Reich, and quarterbacks Carson Wentz and Jacoby Brissett for inspiring the play. Though nearly every team in the NFL has run it, the Eagles are the face of the play (or perhaps the tush of it). It was Philadelphia that ran what some believed would be the final such play in its Super Bowl LIX win over the Chiefs — the team’s first touchdown of the game — when Jalen Hurts powered his way into the Caesars Superdome end zone.

When asked in March how he would feel if he ended up being the last coach to call a tush push, Saints coach and former Eagles offensive coordinator Kellen Moore said: “Give credit to Jalen and all those guys for creating a play that someone decided we’re just going to make a rule up to stop it. “

In the end, an impossible-to-stop play remained impossible to stop, even for the league office and a conference room full of owners.

play

0:41

Saquon Barkley to tush push critics: ‘Get better at stopping it’

Philadelphia Eagles star Saquon Barkley discusses the tush push debate before this year’s Met Gala.

IN THE THREE-ISH-YEAR NFL lifespan of the play, 28 of 32 teams have run a variation of it. The only four clubs that have never pushed the player taking the direct snap on a sneak are ones that have smaller or possibly more fragile quarterbacks — Miami, Carolina and Washington, plus New Orleans, which has a dynamic backup in Taysom Hill with his own short-yardage packages.

Not every push sneak is made equal (some feature a very late and likely incidental push from a running back out of the I-formation), and there is no specific stat available to ESPN to filter for the distinct formation that we recognize as the Eagles tush push, where the offensive line is crouched low to the ground and the running backs, tight ends or receivers cluster on each side of the quarterback or behind him in a tripod shape. So ESPN’s push sneak numbers reflect all kinds of sneaks where the player taking the direct snap under center is pushed by another player at any point.

Since 2022, 12 teams have scored touchdowns using the tush push. Philadelphia has run more tush pushes than any other team (124 for 106 first downs and 33 touchdowns, nearly twice the number of push sneaks as the Bills, the team with the second most) and converted 85.5% of them, but Buffalo has a better first-down success rate than the Eagles, and has converted 88.2% (60 of 68 attempts) for first downs.

Though no other team has come close to running the play as much as the Eagles, Philadelphia’s success with the tush push coincided with a leaguewide increase in quarterback sneaks.

The tush push is NOT dead. Long live the tush push. AP Photo/Chris Szagola

In 2016, the first year ESPN started tracking quarterback sneaks, there were 109 sneaks. By 2020, that number had doubled to 234, and by 2023, the year after the Eagles ramped up their own sneak usage and leaned into the tush push, the leaguewide sneak usage plateaued at triple the 2016 number: 341 sneaks.

Even if passed, the proposal wouldn’t have prevented the quarterback sneak, just the pushing aspect, and, as the Eagles said multiple times during their advocacy for this play at league meetings this offseason, their success rate has actually been higher on sneaks without pushing.

According to ESPN data, which has identified push sneaks since the 2022 season, the Eagles have run only six regular non-push sneaks in the last three seasons, compared with 124 push sneaks.

Their success rate on regular sneaks is 83.3%, 2.3 percentage points lower than their success rate when pushing.

Lament the continued legality of the tush push if you must, or choose to celebrate its best qualities: The tush push is innovative; it’s efficient; and it requires more skill and technique than you might think. The tush push is far from dead … long live the tush push?

The first one

Nov. 21, 2021
The start of the Tush Push era. pic.twitter.com/eJejydq41E

— Kalyn Kahler (@kalynkahler) May 14, 2025

Contrary to popular belief, the first Eagles tush push actually happened as early as 2021. Stoutland and his O-line group led by center Jason Kelce had been a fan of the quarterback sneak well before Sirianni arrived as the head coach that January. During previous coach Doug Pederson’s tenure, the Eagles had pushed the boundaries of going for it on fourth down and had used quarterback sneaks with the mobile, 6-foot-5 and 230-plus-pound Wentz to convert many of them.

In 2021, Hurts’ first full season as the Eagles’ starting quarterback, that short-yardage philosophy continued. And in the first quarter of a Week 11 game at home vs. the Saints, tight end Dallas Goedert motioned left across the formation and then came back to the right to settle in just behind Hurts. At the snap, he pushed to help Hurts get the yard needed.

It was the only one of their 18 sneaks that year that featured a planned push. But the next year, the Eagles nearly doubled their sneak total, running 35 sneaks in a year that ended in the Super Bowl, 16 of which were push sneaks. They even ran six sneaks in the Super Bowl loss.

The pushing started in earnest in Week 1 of 2022, with Goedert motioning and pushing. Then Philadelphia tried out different variations of pushers throughout the 2022 season — lining up a running back behind Hurts, and then debuting the now-familiar formation with a player on each of Hurts’ hips (similar to what Snyder’s Kansas State teams did) against Dallas in Week 6.

The one that wasn’t

The Eagles pull off the fake tush push 😂

🎥: @NFL pic.twitter.com/UVc7RDqWug

— The Sporting News (@sportingnews) October 29, 2023

The Eagles pulled off a fake sneak more than once, and that’s what made the tush push a thing of game-planning beauty. When defenses committed to stopping it (look closely and you can see defensive tackle Jonathan Allen throw himself sideways, almost lying on the ground to stop the offensive line), it left them vulnerable on the outside for a play like this.

The one that made the Bills really mad

Eagles center Jason Kelce on @SportsRadioWIP said that the Bills Jordan Phillips should be fined for this play on Sunday. Phillips jumped offside as Philly was set up to run QB sneak.
Kelce “He purposely tried to hurt Cam Jurgens” Audio in WIP clip below
Thoughts #BillsMafia ?… https://t.co/KZfTr3XL3q pic.twitter.com/JmYIGPG6Pv

— Mike Catalana (@MikeCatalana) November 29, 2023

Another beautiful thing about this play is that even when it doesn’t work, it still works. All the Eagles had to do here was line up in a formation that resembled the tush push and be in a short-yardage situation, and Bills defensive tackle Jordan Phillips got hot to stop it, left early and plowed through Eagles offensive lineman Cam Jurgens. The officials called an encroachment penalty for 5 yards, and Kelce argued that it should have been a personal foul for 15 yards.

At the combine this February, Niners general manager John Lynch, who is a member of the league’s competition committee, talked about how he was afraid that this play would lead to defensive players acting out. “I think back to my playing days, and I think that might have made me do things that I wouldn’t be proud of because if they aren’t going to stop it, I’ll stop it,” Lynch told reporters. “That kind of trickles into players that have a certain mentality [in their] head. I’m just being truthful there. I hope that’s never the case.”

The one where the Chiefs faked a field goal

The Chiefs’ fake field goal *really* faked out the Amazon Prime Video broadcast. #TNF 📺🏈😵‍💫 pic.twitter.com/pWcTv5cDQ0

— Awful Announcing (@awfulannouncing) October 13, 2023

Kansas City has never run a tush push with Patrick Mahomes, but it did run one of the coolest variations of the play on special teams, which is surprising because ever since having Mahomes and a successful offense, the Chiefs’ special teams unit has been pretty conservative. The only time Kansas City has ever tried this play was out of a field goal formation while up 3-0 in the second quarter against Denver in 2023.

Just before the snap, holder Tommy Townsend ran up to the line of scrimmage, and at the same time, tight end Noah Gray and offensive lineman Wanya Morris ran in from the wings. Gray took the direct snap, and Morris and Townsend pushed him forward.

This looked awesome, but the Chiefs ran this on fourth-and-2, and Gray gained just 1 yard.

The one where the Jaguars countered

Nov. 3, 2024
Jaguars show that defense can push too. pic.twitter.com/L85FTQAM4Y

— Kalyn Kahler (@kalynkahler) May 14, 2025

The 2024 Jaguars were not a good team, but they can hang a banner for stopping two Eagles tush pushes on 2-point conversion attempts in Week 9 of last season — and the way they did it was something not many other defenses have tried to do. The argument for the tush push’s place in the NFL is that football is all about innovation as a necessity. Offenses put stress on defenses to find ways to counter their creativity, and that’s how the game grows and stays interesting. The Jaguars found a way to push back on the Eagles — literally — by lining up two linebackers close behind their defensive linemen, particularly the one lined up across from the Eagles center. Stopping the Eagles’ center from getting the low drive is the key to stopping the play, and the Jaguars committed their linebackers to backing up their defensive linemen instead of trying to time the snap and leap over the top to stop Hurts’ momentum, as most other teams did.

At the league meeting in March, multiple head coaches said the tush push shouldn’t be allowed because pushing defensive linemen isn’t allowed on field goal block attempts. What many of those coaches didn’t mention is that pushing defensive players on a regular offensive down is legal and a strategy they could have employed.

“The defense can push as well,” ex-Eagles OC Moore said in March. “As it’s written right now, it’s not like the defense can’t push as well.”

The Jaguars showed on tape what can happen when you counter the Eagles with their own attack. But Falcons coach Raheem Morris said at the March meeting that he wasn’t comfortable doing that with his defensive players.

“I don’t like the play because of what I have to do to try to stop it and for me to have someone push a human into another human, potentially what could happen, I don’t like. … I don’t want to do what I think is necessary to try to stop it.”

The one that was a six-in-a-row ‘s— show’

“Encroachment, defense No. 93. Washington has been advised that at some point the referee can award a score if this type of behavior happens again. For now, it’s a replay of second down.” – Shawn Hochuli, after Fox’s Mike Pereira alluded to this as well.pic.twitter.com/jZcDABVdMv

— Awful Announcing (@awfulannouncing) January 26, 2025

The Eagles love to run this play back-to-back, because they are rarely stopped for no gain, so if they need a yard on third down and get a half a yard, that sets them up for a positive fourth-down opportunity to run it back.

Philadelphia ran a push sneak three times in a row against Arizona in 2022, illustrating that commitment. Then, this past January, they repeated the play six consecutive times after four Commanders defensive penalties nullified second down, took a minute off the game clock, and ultimately prompted referee Shawn Hochuli to issue an official warning to Washington that if it committed another “palpably unfair act,” he would award the Eagles a touchdown.

“I was aware that that may happen if there’s a continued penalty over and over,” Washington coach Dan Quinn said at the March league meeting. “But we’re not going to concede to anything. That’s not how we get down. So that meant, we’re going to go fight for it to the last second of the last play of the last moment.”

Again, the beauty of this play is that, just by threatening it, the Eagles already won. And for the Commanders, taking the consequences of half the distance to the goal to live another play was better than surrendering a touchdown, which they ultimately did on the sixth tush push attempt, after Hochuli’s warning.

It was a series that made the tush push a real target for elimination because of that “pace of play” logic, that this isn’t a watchable television product. One source familiar with the competition committee’s thinking told ESPN the series was a “s— show” that created real momentum for banning the play.

The one where Josh Allen loved the left guard

KC sniffed out Josh Allen to the left guard. pic.twitter.com/xiVTh7Jhik

— Kalyn Kahler (@kalynkahler) May 14, 2025

What the Chiefs saw on film: pic.twitter.com/dgQPHSkgVU

— Kalyn Kahler (@kalynkahler) May 14, 2025

When Hurts runs this play, he usually goes straight forward, following his center immediately at the snap, and the Eagles’ offensive line gets such a push — or, as they called it, a “knockback” — that Hurts can just ride the wave forward. But the quarterback who has run the second-most tush pushes does it a little differently, and it would ultimately cost him in this case. Instead of moving directly forward at the snap, Bills quarterback Allen took the snap and often waited a split second before stepping to his left and following the space created by Buffalo’s left guard. According to TruMedia, Allen has stepped to his left on 42 of 68 push sneak attempts.

Kansas City sniffed out this tendency ahead of the AFC title game and prepared for it.

“I mean, from our defensive side, he always QB sneaks to our right,” Chiefs safety Nazeeh Johnson told SiriusXM’s Mad Dog Sports Radio. “So every time we see him in QB sneak formation, we know he’s coming to the right side every time. It’s a hundred percent, 10-for-10, he’s going to that side.”

The Bills converted only two of five sneak attempts in the game, including one that drew an unfavorable and much-debated Buffalo spot on fourth down.

The most recent one … but NOT the last one

Super Bowl tush push tuddy has arrived ‼️ #FlyEaglesFly

📺: #SBLIX on FOX
📱: Tubi + NFL app pic.twitter.com/PA4G79M9uY

— NFL (@NFL) February 10, 2025

The Eagles ran only one tush push in their second Super Bowl appearance ATP (After Tush Push) because they simply didn’t need it any more than that against the Chiefs. The Eagles rarely found themselves in late-down, short-yardage situations, and because they got off to a quick lead, they could settle for field goals on fourth down.

Chiefs defensive tackle Chris Jones laid himself out horizontally in an all-out effort to stop the play at the goal line, similar to the Commanders’ defensive line technique.

Chris Jones lined up sideways to try stopping the tush push 😯 pic.twitter.com/yHhOhxeRlW

— NFL (@NFL) February 18, 2025

Philadelphia’s first touchdown in Super Bowl LIX nearly turned out to be its last tush push. But after Wednesday’s vote, the play lives on. Expect the controversy to endure as well.





Source link

May 22, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Google Doubles Down on AI: Veo 3, Imagen 4 and Gemini Diffusion Push Creative Boundaries
Crypto Trends

Google Doubles Down on AI: Veo 3, Imagen 4 and Gemini Diffusion Push Creative Boundaries

by admin May 21, 2025



Google I/O 2025 was never about subtlety. This year, the company abandoned incrementalism, delivering a cascade of generative AI upgrades that aim to redraw the map for search, video, and digital creativity.

The linchpin: Gemini, Google’s next-gen model family, is now powering everything from search results to video synthesis and high-resolution image creation—staking out new territory in a race increasingly defined by how fast, and how natively, AI can generate.

The showstopper is Veo 3, Google’s first AI video generator that creates not just visuals, but complete soundtracks—ambient noise, effects, even dialogue—synchronized directly with the footage. Text and image prompts go in, and fully-produced 4K video comes out.

This marks the first large-scale video model capable of generating audio and visuals simultaneously—a trend that began with Showrunner Alpha, an unreleased model, but Veo3 offers far more versatility, generating various styles beyond simple 2D cartoon animations.

“We’re entering a new era of creation with combined audio and video generation,” Google Labs VP Josh Woodward said during the launch. It’s a direct challenge to current video generation leaders—Kling, Hunyuan, Luma, Wan, and OpenAI’s Sora—positioning Veo as an all-in-one solution rather than requiring multiple tools.

Alongside Veo3, Imagen 4—Google’s latest iteration of its image generator model—arrives with enhanced photorealism, 2K resolution, and perhaps most importantly, text rendering that actually works for signage, products, and digital mockups.

For anyone who’s suffered through the gibberish text created by previous AI image models, Imagen 4 represents a significant improvement.

These tools don’t exist in isolation. Flow AI, a new subscription feature for professional users, combines Veo, Imagen, and Gemini’s language capabilities into a unified filmmaking and scene-editing environment. But this integration comes at a price—$125 per month to access the complete toolkit as part of a promotional period until the full $250 price starts to be charged.

Image: Google

Gemini: Powering search and “text diffusion”

Generative AI isn’t just for content creators. Gemini 2.5 now forms the backbone of the company’s redesigned search engine, which Google wants to evolve from a link aggregator into a dynamic, conversational interface that handles complex queries and delivers synthesized, multi-source answers.

AI overviews—where Google Gemini attempts to provide comprehensive answers to queries without requiring users to click through to other sites—now sit at the top of search pages, with Google reporting over 1.5 billion monthly users.

Image: Google via Youtube

Another interesting development is “Gemini Diffusion,” built with technology pioneered by Inception Labs months ago. Until recently, the AI community generally agreed that autoregressive technology worked best for text generation while diffusion technology excelled for images.

Autoregressive models generate each new token after reading all previous generations to determine the best next token—ideal for crafting coherent text responses by constantly reviewing the prompt and prior output.

Diffusion technology operates differently, starting with filling all the context with random information and refining (diffusing) the output each step to make the final product match the prompt—perfect for images with fixed canvases and aesthetics.

OpenAI first successfully applied autoregressive generation to image models, and now Google has become the first major company to apply diffusion generation to text. This means the model begins with nonsense and refines the entire output with each iteration, producing thousands of tokens per second while maintaining accuracy—for context, Groq (not xAI’s Grok), which is one of the fastest inference providers in the world, generates near 275 tokens per second, and traditional providers like OpenAI or Anthropic cannot come close to those speeds.

The model, however, isn’t publicly available yet—interested users must join a waiting list—but early adopters have shared impressive results showing the model’s speed and precision.

Hands-on with Google’s AI tools

We got our hands on several of Google’s new AI features, with mixed results depending on the tier.

Deep Research is particularly powerful—even beating ChatGPT’s alternative. This comprehensive research agent evaluates hundreds of sources and delivers reliable information with minimal errors.

What gives it an edge over OpenAI’s research agent is the ability to generate infographics. After producing a complete research text, it can condense that information into visually appealing slides. We fed the model everything about Google’s latest announcement, and it presented accurate information through charts, schemes, graphs, and mind maps.

Veo 3 remains exclusive to Gemini Ultra users, though some third-party providers like Freepik and Fal.ai already offer access via API. Flow isn’t available to try unless you spring for the Ultra plan.

Flow proves to be an intuitive video editor with Veo’s models at its core, allowing users to edit, cut, extend, and modify AI scenes using simple text prompts.



However, even Veo2 got a little love, which is making life easier for Pro users. Generations with the now-accessible Veo2 are significantly faster—we created 8 seconds of video in about 30 seconds. While Veo2 lacks sound and currently only supports text-to-video (with image-to-video coming soon), it understood our prompts and even generated coherent text.

Veo2 already performs comparably to Kling 2.0—widely considered the quality benchmark in the generative video industry. The new generations with Veo3 seem to be even more realistic, coherent, with good background sound and lifelike dialogue and voices.

For Imagen, it’s difficult to determine at first glance whether Google incorporates version 4 or still uses version 3 on its Gemini chatbot interface, though users can confirm this through Whisk. Our initial tests suggest Imagen 4 prioritizes realism unless specified otherwise, with better prompt adherence and visuals that surpass its predecessor.

We generated an image with different elements that don’t usually fit together in the same scene. Our prompt was “Photo of a woman with a skin made of glass, surrounded by thousands of glitter and ethereal pieces in a baroque room with the word ‘Decrypt’ written in neon, realistic.”

Even though both Imagen 3 and Imagen 4 understood the concept and the elements, Imagen 3 failed to capture the realistic style—which Imagen 4 easily did. Overall, Imagen 4 is comparable to the SOTA image generators, especially considering how easy it is to prompt.

Audio overviews have also improved, with models now easily providing over 20 minutes of full debates on Gemini instead of forcing users to switch to NotebookLM. This makes Gemini a more complete interface, reducing the fragmentation that previously required users to jump between different sites for various services.

The quality is comparable to that of NotebookLM, with slightly longer outputs on average. However, the key feature is not that the model is better, but that it is now embedded into Gemini’s chatbot UI.

Premium AI at a premium price

Google didn’t hide its monetization strategy. The company’s “Ultra” plan costs $250 monthly, bundling priority access to the most powerful models, Flow AI tools, and 30 terabytes of storage—clearly targeting filmmakers, serious creators, and businesses. The $20 “AI Pro” tier unlocks Google’s previous Veo2 model, along with image and productivity features for a broader user base. Basic generative tools—like simple Gemini Live and image creation—remain free, but with limitations like a token cap and only 10 researches per month.

This tiered approach mirrors the broader AI market trend: drive mass adoption with freebies, and then lock in the professionals with features too useful to pass up. Google’s bet is that the real action (and margin) is in high-end creative work and automated enterprise workflows—not just casual prompts and meme generation.

Edited by Andrew Hayward

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.



Source link

May 21, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (96)
  • Esports (75)
  • Game Reviews (81)
  • Game Updates (86)
  • GameFi Guides (94)
  • Gaming Gear (94)
  • NFT Gaming (88)
  • Product Reviews (96)
  • Uncategorized (1)

Recent Posts

  • Nintendo Switch 2 will support regular USB mice in at least one game
  • Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Tactical Takedown Review – Splitting Up The Family
  • Prices Head Lower as Trade War Heats Up
  • DGX B200 Blackwell node sets world record, breaking over 1,000 TPS/user
  • Dungeon RNG codes (May 2025)

Recent Posts

  • Nintendo Switch 2 will support regular USB mice in at least one game

    May 24, 2025
  • Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Tactical Takedown Review – Splitting Up The Family

    May 24, 2025
  • Prices Head Lower as Trade War Heats Up

    May 24, 2025
  • DGX B200 Blackwell node sets world record, breaking over 1,000 TPS/user

    May 24, 2025
  • Dungeon RNG codes (May 2025)

    May 24, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • Nintendo Switch 2 will support regular USB mice in at least one game

    May 24, 2025
  • Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Tactical Takedown Review – Splitting Up The Family

    May 24, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close