Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

plagiarism

Disney, Universal Sue Midjourney Over AI Images, Calling It 'a Bottomless Pit of Plagiarism'
Gaming Gear

Disney, Universal Sue Midjourney Over AI Images, Calling It ‘a Bottomless Pit of Plagiarism’

by admin June 12, 2025


Disney, Universal and several of their entertainment companies filed a lawsuit against popular AI creative service Midjourney on Wednesday, alleging that the company committed copyright infringement. It’s a big move from power players and will no doubt create ripple effects across the AI and entertainment industries that’ll flow all the way to what you can create using AI tools.

Midjourney is one of many AI image generators that use generative AI text-to-image technology. With an account, anyone can use its models to create digital images. Many AI image generators have policies and internal guardrails that prevent people from being able to re-create brand logos, celebrity likenesses and other kinds of recognizable and sometimes copyrighted material. Disney and Universal are alleging that Midjourney didn’t take these precautions, even after they reached out to express their concerns.

The companies wrote in the lawsuit that Midjourney’s AI image- and upcoming video-generation technologies “blatantly incorporate and copy Disney’s and Universal’s famous characters” without proper licensing or having a hand in their original creation. “Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism,” the lawsuit alleges.

The 100-plus-page lawsuit details the ways Midjourney enables its users to re-create characters that belong to Disney’s and Universal’s different worlds, like Marvel and Star Wars. It includes examples of images the companies were able to generate that feature some of their iconic characters, including those from Shrek, Star Wars and DreamWorks’ How to Train Your Dragon. 

Midjourney didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Disney included these images in its complaint as examples of AI images made with Midjourney that mimic copyrighted characters.

Screenshot by Katelyn Chedraoui/CNET

Copyright is one of the core legal and ethical issues in AI, and this is far from the first major lawsuit between entertainment companies and AI companies. There’s an ongoing class-action lawsuit from a collection of artists, led by Karla Ortiz, against Stability AI. Publishers like The New York Times are also concerned, suing ChatGPT maker OpenAI. 

(Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET’s parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.)

At the same time, some entertainment companies are slowly exploring ways to integrate AI into their creative workflows. Disney has been fairly mum about AI, not endorsing or making partnerships like its peers at Lionsgate but not publicly ruling out the possibility either. That possibility is reflected in the statement Disney made to CNET via email.

“We are bullish on the promise of AI technology and optimistic about how it can be used responsibly as a tool to further human creativity,” Horacio Gutierrez, senior executive vice president and chief legal and compliance officer, said in the statement. “But piracy is piracy, and the fact that it’s done by an AI company does not make it any less infringing.”

Another example Disney cites in its lawsuit.

Screenshot by Katelyn Chedraoui/CNET

Read more: Inside Hollywood’s AI Power Struggle: Where Does Human Creativity Go From Here?

Today’s lawsuit marks a path forward for Disney and Universal and adds another strand to an already tangled legal web.

“The lawsuit filed by Disney and Universal is important in drawing a line in the sand with AI developers like Midjourney,” Robert Rosenberg, an intellectual-property lawyer and former general counsel at Showtime Networks, said in an email. “As the lawsuit explains, the only way the AI platforms can output an image of Yoda, Shrek or Darth Vader is because they have trained their model by ingesting copyrighted images of these characters. They are not inventing new characters here.”

For now, we’ll have to wait and see how this case and the other court cases progress. In the meantime, Midjourney users and other AI users are able to continue utilizing those services.

For more, check out our guide to understanding copyright in the age of AI.



Source link

June 12, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Decrypt logo
GameFi Guides

Disney, Universal, DreamWorks Sue Midjourney, Call It a ‘Bottomless Pit of Plagiarism’

by admin June 12, 2025



In brief

  • Disney and Universal are among a group of studios that filed a lawsuit against AI firm Midjourney.
  • The studios claim the image generator produces unauthorized copies of copyrighted characters.
  • The case highlights a growing wave of copyright suits targeting generative AI tools.

Disney and Universal, along with several other American film studios, have filed a lawsuit against artificial intelligence company Midjourney, alleging that its popular image generation tool systematically violates copyright by creating unauthorized reproductions of famous characters.

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in a U.S. federal court, accuses Midjourney of functioning as a “bottomless pit of plagiarism.”

“By helping itself to Plaintiffs’ copyrighted works, and then distributing images (and soon videos) that blatantly incorporate and copy Disney’s and Universal’s famous characters—without investing a penny in their creation—Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider,” the complaint reads. “Piracy is piracy, and whether an infringing image or video is made with AI or another technology does not make it any less infringing.”

The studios, which also include DreamWorks and the Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, cited examples of Midjourney-generated outputs that included likenesses of Yoda, Marvel superheroes, characters from Aladdin, Minions, The Simpsons, and Shrek.

They are seeking damages and an injunction to stop the platform from reproducing, displaying, or distributing their copyrighted content. Decrypt has approached Midjourney for comment on the suit.

The case is part of a mounting wave of lawsuits confronting AI companies over copyright violations. 



As generative AI tools become more widespread, legal scrutiny over their training data and outputs has intensified. The New York Times sued OpenAI and Microsoft in December 2023, and Reddit is currently pursuing legal action against Anthropic. Other plaintiffs include music publishers and media companies such as Ziff Davis.

The core legal question in these suits is whether AI companies can lawfully use copyrighted works without permission during training or generation.

Companies like OpenAI have acknowledged using copyrighted content in training and argued it would be “impossible” to develop AI systems without it.

Filtering out the issue

While some firms have sought licensing deals with copyright holders, others, like Midjourney, have faced criticism for inadequate safeguards.

In the complaint, the studios argue that Midjourney has the ability to filter prompts and outputs, just as it currently blocks certain violent or pornographic content. They claim the company could easily implement similar protections for copyrighted material, but has chosen not to.

Midjourney faced controversy in its early days for limiting image generation related to Chinese President Xi Jinping and for allowing the creation of images of other world leaders.

Meanwhile, the film industry is grappling with how AI will reshape creative labor. A report from the British Film Institute this week warned that AI poses a direct threat to screen sector jobs and revenue.

It cited research suggesting global audiovisual creators may lose up to 21% in revenue over three years and that more than 200,000 U.S. entertainment jobs could be disrupted by 2026, particularly entry-level positions.

Disney, Universal, and DreamWorks have been approached for further comment. 

Edited by Sebastian Sinclair

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.



Source link

June 12, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Morale at Bungie reportedly in "free fall" after disastrous art plagiarism fiasco and horrendous community-facing live stream
Game Updates

Morale at Bungie reportedly in “free fall” after disastrous art plagiarism fiasco and horrendous community-facing live stream

by admin May 21, 2025


It’s been reported by Forbes that developers at Bungie, the studio behind Destiny 2 and the upcoming extraction shooter Marathon, are tanking some serious damage to their will. According to the report, morale is in “free fall” following revelations that work from artist Antireal was used in Marathon without permission.

Marathon art director Joe Cross and game director Joe Ziegler teamed up for a community-facing livestream on May 16, which was already scheduled prior to news of the plagiarism breaking, but naturally saw the devs address the controversy rather than proceeding as normal. In what proved to be an awkward and frankly hard to watch event, Cross read out an official statement he wrote about what’s next regarding Antireal’s work in Marathon in place of a planned showcase of art which, for obvious reasons, didn’t happen.


To see this content please enable targeting cookies.

Manage cookie settings

Cross stated: “It came to our attention that an artist who worked on Marathon in the early stages of pre-production took a number of graphic elements from a graphic designer, without permission or acknowledgement, and placed them on a decal sheet that was then checked in in 2020. The decal sheet included icons and text elements. These elements ended up in our alpha build, and there is absolutely no excuse for this oversight, and we are working on, and 100% committed to, our review process to ensure instances like this don’t happen again on Marathon or at Bungie.

“A few of the things that we’ve done to shore up the review process are as follows: We’ve reached out to Antireal to follow up to make sure we do right by this artist. We’re auditing all of the previous work by the internal artist, including environment decals already in the build, which is why we’re delaying some of the content we were going to show today. We’re committed to removing that is questionably or innapropriately sourced. We’re doing a broad decal audit, and if we find any other details or elements, we’ll make sure they are eliminated and recreated in-house for sure.

You can watch the full statement here.Watch on YouTube

“Hundreds of artists have worked on this project for years intenrally and externally, and we share many influences including modernism, Swiss typography, 2000’s style vector art, Cyber Punk, and of course the original Marathon trilogy. Our style is a result of all of those inspirations, and it’s worth noting that none of our external partners who have worked on branding or the visual design of our game were involved in this situation.”

This statement didn’t go down especially well with live viewers of the stream, with the majority of the questions coming from chat live relating to the Marathon art and how exactly Bungie would make right by Antireal. Since this stream wrapped up, community sentiment remains largely sceptical, pending the results of the audit mentioned in the statement.

Enter Forbes’ article, published a day after this stream, in which Paul Tassi reported having been told by staff at Bungie that “the vibes have never been worse”. In addition, he claimed to have been told that the staff are worried what will happen if Marathon bombs. Bungie, having suffered wave after wave of layoffs of recent years, is in desperate need for a big financial win these days.

Tassi also reported that the public-facing explanation for the art theft is the same being given internally, and that legal teams from Bungie and Sony are currently sorting through this issue. Also, the report alleges Marathon was pitched by “good old boy” leadership at Bungie, which it claims has been been ignoring developer input on what Marathon should/shouldn’t have for years, including the idea that the game should have a PvE element – the absence
of which is proving to be a major sour point for some alpha testers.

We recommend reading Forbes’ article for the full report, but it’s safe to say that it’s been a particularly bad few days for Bungie and the Marathon team. Bungie, a company which is no stranger to plagiarism controversy, finds itself stuck in the mud in yet another debacle. This one coming roughly months ahead of the planned release date for Marathon likely spells trouble for the game’s prospects, especially if it can’t shake this negative sentiment.



Source link

May 21, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (1,001)
  • Esports (754)
  • Game Reviews (692)
  • Game Updates (881)
  • GameFi Guides (993)
  • Gaming Gear (948)
  • NFT Gaming (976)
  • Product Reviews (938)
  • Uncategorized (1)

Recent Posts

  • The Next Era Of Metal Gear Solid Is Being Entrusted To A New Generation Of Developers, If It’s Made
  • Apple Sues Chinese Phonemaker Oppo For Alleged Trade Secrets Theft
  • XRP Price Prediction for August 24
  • Bitcoin (BTC) Bull Run Cancelled? Shiba Inu (SHIB) Hits 0 in Key Metric, XRP’s Unthinkable Comeback
  • Open hardware dream collapses as Prusa slams China’s subsidies, patents, and aggressive tactics that reshaped 3D printing from an open playground into a corporate battlefield

Recent Posts

  • The Next Era Of Metal Gear Solid Is Being Entrusted To A New Generation Of Developers, If It’s Made

    August 25, 2025
  • Apple Sues Chinese Phonemaker Oppo For Alleged Trade Secrets Theft

    August 25, 2025
  • XRP Price Prediction for August 24

    August 25, 2025
  • Bitcoin (BTC) Bull Run Cancelled? Shiba Inu (SHIB) Hits 0 in Key Metric, XRP’s Unthinkable Comeback

    August 25, 2025
  • Open hardware dream collapses as Prusa slams China’s subsidies, patents, and aggressive tactics that reshaped 3D printing from an open playground into a corporate battlefield

    August 25, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • The Next Era Of Metal Gear Solid Is Being Entrusted To A New Generation Of Developers, If It’s Made

    August 25, 2025
  • Apple Sues Chinese Phonemaker Oppo For Alleged Trade Secrets Theft

    August 25, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close