Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

Legal

Decrypt logo
GameFi Guides

‘Nothing Illegal’: Creator of ICE Tracking App Plans Legal Action After Apple Removal

by admin October 4, 2025



In brief

  • The DOJ under Pam Bondi demanded Apple take down ICEBlock, while Google pulled down Red Dot citing safety.
  • ICEBlock creator Joshua Aaron called the removal a violation of First Amendment rights.
  • Aaron warned that constitutional rights are “being stripped away” and vowed a legal fight.

Bowing to federal pressure, Google and Apple yanked two popular apps, ICEBlock and Red Dot, that let users crowdsource reports of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity, citing officer safety after a deadly sniper attack at an ICE field office in Texas.

On Thursday, Google and Apple both removed the Red Dot app. Apple also pulled the iOS-specific ICEBlock app after the U.S. Department of Justice under Attorney General Pam Bondi formally demanded its removal. Bondi said in a statement to Fox News that the app “is designed to put ICE agents at risk just for doing their jobs,” and vowed to protect federal law-enforcement officers.

Joshua Aaron, creator of ICEBlock, said Apple’s removal blindsided him.

“The app was thoroughly vetted for three weeks by Apple’s legal and senior officials before approval,” he told Decrypt. “It’s been fine all this time. For them to do it now, that’s why I say I’m so disappointed.”

Aaron, a software developer and the lead singer of the rock band Stealing Heather, released ICEBlock in April. In July, as ICE operations ramped up across the United States, ICEBlock went viral after being called out by Bondi, who called it a tool for “signaling to criminals where our federal officers are.”

Aaron said Apple has not reached out to him or given him a chance to appeal the decision.

“Apple has not called me, even though we were number one in the App Store for weeks and had 1.14 million users that counted on this every single minute of their day,” he said. “They just gave me a letter that said we received information from law enforcement that your app is targeting or harming law enforcement officials.”



Aaron compared ICEBlock to mainstream navigation tools like Apple Maps, Google Maps, and Waze.

“To somehow say that ICEBlock is doing anything different than that is ridiculous,” he said.

Federal pressure intensifies

Apple’s removal came after Bondi’s DOJ formally asked for the app to be pulled, citing officer safety.

“We created the App Store to be a safe and trusted place to discover apps. Based on information we’ve received from law enforcement about the safety risks associated with ICEBlock, we have removed it and similar apps from the App Store,” Apple told Fox News.

Google echoed that sentiment with its removal of Red Dot, going so far as to suggest to 404 Media that ICE agents are a “vulnerable group.”

“ICEBlock was never available on Google Play, but we removed similar apps for violations of our policies,” a Google spokesperson told Decrypt. The spokesperson, who said that the federal government did not reach out to the search giant, said the Red Dot app was removed due to “high risk of abuse” and rules around user-generated content.

On September 24, a sniper attack at an ICE facility in Dallas killed one detainee and injured two others. Authorities said the suspect was aiming for ICE officers and had searched his phone for tracking apps, including ICEBlock, before opening fire.

Aaron called the takedown a “First Amendment violation,” and said he plans to fight it in court and in the media.

“This is not some app taken down from the App Store; this is a tech company removing something that is clearly a First Amendment-protected app,” he said. “There’s nothing illegal about developing it. There’s nothing illegal about using it. They are now deciding what you can and cannot use on a device that you own.”

He also rejected Google’s description of ICE agents as a “vulnerable group.”

“They gave $170 billion to create their own paramilitary force in this country,” he said. “To say they’re in danger is laughable at best.”

Apple did not immediately respond to requests for comment by Decrypt.

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.



Source link

October 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
is online baccarat legal in canada what players need to know before playing
Esports

Is Online Baccarat Legal in Canada? Read Before Playing

by admin October 2, 2025


Online baccarat holds a strong reputation as one of the most elegant casino games, both on the floor and behind the screen. In Canada, players who want to join a baccarat table from home face a unique legal setup. 

Unlike many countries with a single federal framework, Canada leaves gambling law in the hands of its provinces — and this quilt of laws can create some confusion about legality and licensing. 

Knowing where a casino is regulated, what authorities oversee it, and how disputes are handled helps anyone who wants to enjoy baccarat online with peace of mind.

Is Baccarat Legal in Canada? An Overview

Baccarat itself is legal to play online in Canada, but the rules that govern access vary depending on where you live. Gambling law is managed at the provincial level, so there is no single national regulator that covers every Canadian player. Instead, each province decides how to authorise online casinos, how to license operators, and how to protect players.

Ontario stands apart with its open market model, where multiple private companies can offer casino games under the oversight of AGCO and iGaming Ontario.

Other provinces rely on their lottery corporations, which provide government-operated sites for residents. Offshore casinos still accept Canadian players, though these are not officially sanctioned under Canadian law and carry different risks.

Live Dealer Baccarat

Live dealer baccarat has become one of the most popular online formats in Canada, and one that’s especially enjoyable once you learn baccarat rules before you play due to its quick flow. Players enjoy the chance to stream real-time tables, interact with professional dealers, and follow a more authentic casino rhythm. 

These games operate from studios equipped with cameras, sensors, and advanced software to broadcast results instantly.

In Canada, live dealer legality depends on provincial oversight. Ontario-licensed platforms host games from certified providers that meet AGCO standards. Lottery-run sites in other provinces also partner with approved studios, though their selections may be more limited.

The Provincial Model Explained

Canada operates under a decentralised gambling model. Each province has the right to regulate its own gambling services, both land-based and digital. For players, this means that the legality of playing baccarat online depends largely on location.

Some of the oversight and licensing organs are:

  • AGCO in Ontario
  • The Kanawahke Gaming Commission
  • PlayNow in British Columbia
  • EspaceJeux in Québec

Ontario Licensed Casinos and Private Operators

Ontario is the only province that has opened its online casino market to private operators. The framework is built on a partnership between AGCO, which regulates and audits operators, and iGaming Ontario, which manages contracts and revenue sharing.

To operate in Ontario, an online casino must secure approval from AGCO and sign an agreement with iGaming Ontario. This process guarantees that operators meet requirements on fairness, security, and player protection. It also ensures that taxes and fees flow back into provincial programs.

The competition created by this offers players access to dozens of licensed sites that feature baccarat and other games under strict oversight. Compared to lottery-run platforms in other provinces, the variety is far broader.

How Other Provinces Handle Online Casinos

Outside Ontario, players primarily rely on government-operated casino sites. These platforms are overseen by each province’s lottery corporation or regulatory authority. Offshore casinos may still accept Canadian players, but they are not provincially sanctioned.

British Columbia

The British Columbia Lottery Corporation operates PlayNow, offering slots, table games, and live dealer options to residents. It is the province’s sole legal platform.

Quebec

Loto-Québec runs EspaceJeux, which provides an integrated online casino tied to its lottery offerings. All activity falls under its oversight.

Manitoba and Saskatchewan

Manitoba players can use PlayNow through a revenue-sharing agreement with British Columbia. Saskatchewan, on the other hand, launched a regulated online platform in partnership with the Saskatchewan Indian Gaming Authority (SIGA).

Alberta

Alberta Gaming, Liquor and Cannabis Commission oversees PlayAlberta, which is the only government-approved casino site in the province.

Atlantic Provinces

In New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador, Atlantic Lottery operates a joint platform offering casino and lottery games.

Across these regions, each provincial gaming authority controls who can provide online gambling, leaving little room for private competition.

Verifying a Casino License in Canada

Knowing how to confirm whether a casino is legal is crucial for Canadian players. Many offshore sites operate without local authorisation, and the risks of using such platforms include unclear dispute processes or slow withdrawals. 

Thankfully, the process of checking a licence is straightforward and worth taking the time to complete before placing any wagers.

  1. Check the operator’s website footer. All of the best casinos in Canada display their licence details, including the issuing authority.
  2. Confirm the regulator’s seal. Clicking on logos such as AGCO or iGaming Ontario should redirect to an official confirmation page.
  3. Cross-reference with government sites. Provinces publish lists of licensed operators, making it easy to double-check.
  4. Look for KYC and responsible gambling details. Legitimate casinos explain age checks, deposit limits, and self-exclusion tools.
  5. Pay attention to offshore-only licences. If the site only lists authorities outside Canada, it is not provincially approved; this doesn’t mean that the casino is unsafe, just that it’s licensed elsewhere.

Taking these steps helps players avoid disputes down the line.

Age Limits and Access Rules

Canadian provinces enforce strict age requirements for online gambling. KYC (Know Your Customer) processes confirm player identity before access is granted.

  • Alberta, Manitoba, and Quebec: minimum age is 18.
  • All other provinces and territories: minimum age is 19.
  • Verification requires ID such as a driver’s licence or passport.
  • Casinos may request additional documents if the details do not match.

Following these rules ensures compliance with laws and protects underage individuals from accessing digital casinos.

Geolocation in Canadian casinos

Geolocation technology plays a central role in regulating online casinos. Licensed sites use software that confirms a player’s physical location within provincial boundaries. If a player attempts to log in from outside the province, access is blocked.

In Ontario, this system is strictly applied across all operators registered with iGaming Ontario. Online casinos in Alberta and in British Columbia implement similar controls.

The purpose is twofold: to comply with local law and to prevent unlicensed play across borders. Understanding geolocation technology helps explain why access differs depending on where players are physically located at the time of login.

Player Protection Standards

Every province with a legal online casino market includes safeguards designed to promote responsible play. These protections are a core part of regulated gambling and give players confidence that their well-being is taken into account when engaging online.

Deposit limits allow users to control how much money they add within specific timeframes, while self-exclusion programs create options for temporary or permanent suspension from licensed sites. 

Reality checks pop up during sessions to remind players how long they have been active, and access to support services links players with counselling and helplines. Monitoring tools are also built into regulated sites to detect unusual patterns that may indicate risky play.

Disputes and Complaints

Even in regulated markets, disputes may arise over withdrawals, game outcomes, or account suspensions. Licensed provinces offer structured ways to escalate complaints.

  • Step 1: Contact the casino directly. Most issues can be resolved with customer support.
  • Step 2: Use internal dispute resolution forms. Licensed operators must provide formal procedures.
  • Step 3: Escalate to the regulator. Ontario players can file complaints with iGaming Ontario or AGCO. Other provinces have lottery commissions that review disputes.
  • Step 4: Consider external arbitration. In some cases, regulators may direct disputes to independent adjudicators.

Following these steps ensures that the complaint process in Canada is fair and transparent, though offshore operators may not provide the same recourse.

Finding the Right Casinos

Choosing where to play baccarat online is just as important as knowing the legal framework. Beyond legality, though, players often weigh factors such as live dealer availability, customer support, and withdrawal processes.

 The following breakdown shows what matters most when evaluating casinos — you can check our top-rated baccarat casinos and pick your favorite.

Feature Checks

Ontarian platforms stand out because they offer variety, modern features, and live dealer baccarat streamed from certified studios. Players benefit from oversight by AGCO, which makes sure fairness and compliance are upheld at every level.

Outside Ontario, residents access baccarat through government-operated platforms like PlayNow, EspaceJeux, or PlayAlberta. These sites may not have the same range of operators, but they are secure and tied directly to provincial lottery corporations; plus, revenues flow back into community programs, and play is always within legal boundaries.

Safety Checks

No matter the province, it is wise to examine factors such as customer service availability, clear terms on bonuses, and transparent withdrawal timelines. Sites that offer reliable live dealer baccarat tables and straightforward account verification create a smoother experience. 

Know the Law, Play the Game

Canadian players who enjoy baccarat online benefit most when they focus on regulated platforms. Licensing authorities in each province demand strong compliance, which means safer play, clearer payments, and access to responsible gambling tools. 

This framework is built to protect those who want entertainment without unnecessary risks or disputes.

What matters next is making careful choices about where to play. Ontario’s competitive market offers dozens of options, and provincial lottery platforms provide secure alternatives in other regions. Both settings are grounded in legality, but the experience differs depending on the type of site and the oversight body involved. 

The safest path is to join casinos that are licensed under Canadian authority, where regulations are active, fair play is audited, and responsible gambling measures are part of the design.

Dot Esports is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy



Source link

October 2, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Adrienne Harris (Nikhilesh De/CoinDesk)
Crypto Trends

Ripple Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty Says U.S. Congress Must End Crypto Uncertainty

by admin September 30, 2025



Washington has a narrow window to deliver clear U.S. crypto rules, Ripple Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty argues, urging lawmakers to “finish the job on crypto clarity.”

In an op-ed published Monday on RealClearMarkets, Alderoty said the Securities and Exchange Commission has for the first time listed crypto clarity among its top priorities — signaling that “the time has come” for predictable oversight. He framed the issue as mainstream, not niche, pointing to consumer adoption and polling that shows broad support for stronger guardrails.

Alderoty cited several data points to make the case.

A National Cryptocurrency Association (NCA) survey with Harris Poll found roughly one in five U.S. adults owns crypto. Pew Research reported that a majority of Americans lack confidence that current ways to invest, trade or use crypto are reliable and safe. And a YouGov poll showed more Americans favor tighter crypto regulation than looser rules.

He also referenced Chainalysis estimates that Americans transacted more than $1 trillion in digital assets in 2024, spanning uses from payments to savings.

“The absence of clear, consistent rules doesn’t make crypto go away,” Alderoty wrote, warning it pushes activity to jurisdictions moving faster. He argued that clarity would both protect consumers and give responsible firms certainty to build in the U.S.

Alderoty is also president of the National Cryptocurrency Association, a crypto education nonprofit launched on March 5 with a $50 million grant from Ripple. The NCA says it aims to boost literacy and safe adoption through explainers and user stories, and its polling finds most current users want to learn more about the technology.

With Congress weighing market-structure legislation after this summer’s stablecoin law, Alderoty cast the fall session as a pivotal moment. “The opportunity is in front of us. The mandate is already there,” he wrote, adding that lawmakers can “prove to Americans that Washington can, in fact, deliver clarity where it’s needed most.”

He concluded that finishing the rules would keep innovation onshore and ensure the U.S. leads in shaping future financial infrastructure.



Source link

September 30, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
DAAPrivacyRightIcon
Product Reviews

Trump signs executive order saying his TikTok deal is legal

by admin September 25, 2025


President Donald Trump has signed an executive order finalizing some of the terms of a deal to bring TikTok’s US business under American control. The new TikTok entity will be owned by a group of US-based investors, while ByteDance will maintain a smaller stake in the new company and keep the app’s algorithm.

TikTok has faced more than a year of uncertainty about its future in the United States since former President Joe Biden signed a law last year requiring ByteDance to sell TikTok or face a ban. In January, the Supreme Court upheld the law and TikTok briefly went dark just as Trump took office. Trump promptly signed an executive order extending the ban deadline for the app. (He signed off on a fourth extension last week.) Today’s order declares that the plan to split off a US entity from the ByteDance-owned company will meet the requirements of the ban order.

The executive order comes after a flurry of interest in TikTok from US companies and investors. Microsoft, Amazon, Perplexity AI, Reddit cofounder Alexis Ohanian and YouTuber MrBeast were all reportedly among those vying for the business.

Under the new arrangement, US investors will have a large stake in the US entity. CNBC reported that Oracle, Silver Lake and MGX would be part of a core group of investors that own 45 percent of the business. Trump confirmed Oracle’s involvement, and also mentioned Michael Dell and Rupert Murdoch as investors as part of the deal. ByteDance, TikTok’s current owner, will have a 19.9 percent stake and the rest will go to a group of investors that includes ByteDance’s previous investors. Vice President JD Vance said the new company would be valued at around $14 billion.

Oracle, which has previously partnered with the company on data security, will continue in its role overseeing the app’s algorithm and security. The fate of the TikTok algorithm has been a major question. Some lawmakers have questioned the decision to license the algorithm from ByteDance. Earlier this week, both the Republican chair and Democratic ranking member of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party expressed concerns about any arrangement that doesn’t put the algorithm squarely in American hands.

Answering questions after Trump signed the order, Vance said to reporters that the deal ensures that US investors will have “control over how the algorithm pushes content toward users.” In reponse to a question about whether the algorithm would prefer MAGA content, Trump lamented that although he would love for the platform to be 100 percent MAGA, it would in fact treat “everyone fairly.” Trump described China as “fully on board” with the deal.



Source link

September 25, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Decrypt logo
Crypto Trends

X Takes Legal Action Against Crypto Scamming Network’s Bribery Scheme

by admin September 20, 2025



In brief

  • Social media platform X says it’s taking legal action against some banned accounts.
  • The accounts in question allegedly bribed X employees to regain access to the platform.
  • Some of the accounts in question were crypto scammers, X said.

Social media platform X is taking legal action against banned users, including crypto scammers, who have tried to bribe the company’s employees to regain access to the website, the company said in an announcement Friday.

The platform, formerly known as Twitter, said that the bribery network was linked to wider criminal organizations. 

X added that it was working with law enforcement. The company did not reveal much else about the nature of the banned accounts. Decrypt reached out to X for comment. 

“X has exposed and is taking strong action against a bribery network targeting our platform,” read the announcement. “Suspended accounts involved in crypto scams and platform manipulation paid middlemen to attempt to bribe employees to reinstate their suspended accounts.”

It added: “These perpetrators exploit social media platforms like Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Minecraft, and Roblox and are linked to wider criminal organizations, including ‘The Com.'”

X has exposed and is taking strong action against a bribery network targeting our platform. Suspended accounts involved in crypto scams and platform manipulation paid middlemen to attempt to bribe employees to reinstate their suspended accounts. These perpetrators exploit social…

— Global Government Affairs (@GlobalAffairs) September 19, 2025

The Federal Bureau of Investigation in July warned of “a growing and evolving online threat group known as The Com,” adding that the network was mainly made up of minors and worked to commit cyber crimes. 

“The sophistication of The Com criminal activity has grown over the last four years, with subjects employing increasingly complex methods to mask their identities, hide financial transactions, and launder money,” the FBI’s statement said. 



Social media platform X is no stranger to crypto scammers. In 2020, when it was Twitter and owned by Jack Dorsey, criminals hacked a number of celebrity and brand accounts—including former President Barack Obama, Apple, Uber, and rapper Kanye West—to push a Bitcoin scam.

Last year, hackers targeted high-profile accounts to push a Solana-based meme token, compromising the accounts of computer brand Lenovo’s India division, film director Oliver Stone, and Brazilian soccer player Neymar Jr. 

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.





Source link

September 20, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Charles Hoskinson Issues Epic Response to Latest Coinbase vs. SEC Legal Feud
NFT Gaming

Charles Hoskinson Issues Epic Response to Latest Coinbase vs. SEC Legal Feud

by admin September 12, 2025


Charles Hoskinson, founder of Cardano (ADA), has reacted to the new lawsuit between Coinbase and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In a post on X, Hoskinson expressed sarcasm at the requirement by the regulatory body for crypto entities to register.

Charles Hoskinson calls out SEC’s “Register” narrative

For context, former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, while in office, constantly told crypto companies to “Just come in and register.” Gensler insisted that exchanges and crypto projects need to register and comply with securities law.

You Might Also Like

Hoskinson, referencing a post from Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, has called out the SEC for not following its own rules. Notably, Grewal alleged that the SEC under Gensler destroyed some internal memos that would have been useful in their legal proceedings.

According to Grewal, Coinbase is seeking expedited discovery and sanctions, as well as the production of any remaining communications that could aid their case.

As per Hoskinson, it is hypocrisy for the SEC to fine crypto firms billions of dollars for not keeping records, yet they violate the same rules. In his words, “I’m sure Gary can come in and register.”

The Cardano founder is sarcastically suggesting that since the regulatory body is violating record-keeping laws, then maybe Gensler should also come to register for accountability.

Coinbase’s multiple legal battles

Coinbase is caught in a series of legal battles and appears determined to put up a fight to defend itself. 

You Might Also Like

At the end of July, Paul Grewal had submitted a legal brief challenging the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). This was to counter the FDIC’s move to dismiss Coinbase’s lawsuit, which accused the agency of trying to push crypto firms out of the financial space.

Meanwhile, in Oregon, Coinbase is also arguing that the state has no legal authority to enforce crypto regulations independent of U.S. federal laws.

Coinbase insists all its legal battles are to provide regulatory clarity to the crypto sector.



Source link

September 12, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
French Lara Croft taking legal action against Aspyr for AI-generated voice use in Tomb Raider remasters
Game Reviews

French Lara Croft taking legal action against Aspyr for AI-generated voice use in Tomb Raider remasters

by admin September 11, 2025


Françoise Cadol, the actor who voiced the French version of Lara Croft in all of Tomb Raider games from their inception to 2008, is taking legal action against Aspyr Media for the apparent AI-generated use of her voice in the Tomb Raider 4-6 remasters.

Cadol told French newspaper Le Parisien (via The Gamer) that Aspyr Media generated lines of dialogue using her voice without asking her or even notifying her. She has reportedly issued Aspyr a cease and desist demand.

Examples of the allegedly AI-generated voice lines were shared on social media, and in them you can clearly hear the difference between the original Tomb Raider games and the recently remastered ones. A much more robotic reading of the lines suddenly takes over part-way through the remastered dialogue.

🇫🇷 ALERTE INFO — Le patch des remasters de Tomb Raider IV, V et VI par @AspyrMedia vient de sortir…

Mauvaise surprise pour les fans français de Lara Croft, certaines répliques de Françoise Cadol dans le tutoriel ont été refaites avec l’IA et ça s’entend ! pic.twitter.com/YRbZsY669H

— Bastien D. Fry  (@BastienDruker) August 15, 2025

To see this content please enable targeting cookies.

Manage cookie settings

Cadol, who has regularly dubbed for high-profile actors like Angelina Jolie, including dubbing her performance in the 2001 Tomb Raider film, was alerted to the recording discrepancies by French Tomb Raider fans. Speaking to Le Parisien, Cadol said the use of AI here was a “betrayal” of their support.

“It’s a game, my voice accompanies the gamers, we play together,” Cadol said in a translation of the article. “Tomb Raider has been followed by a lot of people over the years, for them, it’s a betrayal, a total disrespect. They are angry.”

Alarmingly, this isn’t the only example of AI-generated voice work in the game. Brazilian actor Lene Bastos was also told by fans that her voice seemed to have been AI-generated in the remasters, and she decided to speak out about it. This prompted a reply – and apology – from Aspyr. Bastos explains in an Instagram video that Aspyr promised to remove the AI-generated lines in an update in a few weeks.

It’s unclear if Aspyr has contacted Cadol and said the same. We’ve requested comment from Aspyr.

Earlier this year, the entire French cast of multiplayer shooter Apex Legends refused to sign an agreement allowing their voices to train generative AI for the game.

“We are asked to give up our expertise to train the generative AI that will replace us tomorrow,” commented Pascale Chemin at the time, the French voice of Wraith in Apex Legends. “We are asked to agree to what we specifically fight against. We are asked to shoot ourselves in the foot. We are asked to support AI.”

Love Eurogamer? Make us a Preferred Source on Google and catch more of our coverage in your feeds.





Source link

September 11, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Should AI Get Legal Rights?
Gaming Gear

Should AI Get Legal Rights?

by admin September 5, 2025


In one paper Eleos AI published, the nonprofit argues for evaluating AI consciousness using a “computational functionalism” approach. A similar idea was once championed by none other than Putnam, though he criticized it later in his career. The theory suggests that human minds can be thought of as specific kinds of computational systems. From there, you can then figure out if other computational systems, such as a chabot, have indicators of sentience similar to those of a human.

Eleos AI said in the paper that “a major challenge in applying” this approach “is that it involves significant judgment calls, both in formulating the indicators and in evaluating their presence or absence in AI systems.”

Model welfare is, of course, a nascent and still evolving field. It’s got plenty of critics, including Mustafa Suleyman, the CEO of Microsoft AI, who recently published a blog about “seemingly conscious AI.”

“This is both premature, and frankly dangerous,” Suleyman wrote, referring generally to the field of model welfare research. “All of this will exacerbate delusions, create yet more dependence-related problems, prey on our psychological vulnerabilities, introduce new dimensions of polarization, complicate existing struggles for rights, and create a huge new category error for society.”

Suleyman wrote that “there is zero evidence” today that conscious AI exists. He included a link to a paper that Long coauthored in 2023 that proposed a new framework for evaluating whether an AI system has “indicator properties” of consciousness. (Suleyman did not respond to a request for comment from WIRED.)

I chatted with Long and Campbell shortly after Suleyman published his blog. They told me that, while they agreed with much of what he said, they don’t believe model welfare research should cease to exist. Rather, they argue that the harms Suleyman referenced are the exact reasons why they want to study the topic in the first place.

“When you have a big, confusing problem or question, the one way to guarantee you’re not going to solve it is to throw your hands up and be like ‘Oh wow, this is too complicated,’” Campbell says. “I think we should at least try.”

Testing Consciousness

Model welfare researchers primarily concern themselves with questions of consciousness. If we can prove that you and I are conscious, they argue, then the same logic could be applied to large language models. To be clear, neither Long nor Campbell think that AI is conscious today, and they also aren’t sure it ever will be. But they want to develop tests that would allow us to prove it.

“The delusions are from people who are concerned with the actual question, ‘Is this AI, conscious?’ and having a scientific framework for thinking about that, I think, is just robustly good,” Long says.

But in a world where AI research can be packaged into sensational headlines and social media videos, heady philosophical questions and mind-bending experiments can easily be misconstrued. Take what happened when Anthropic published a safety report that showed Claude Opus 4 may take “harmful actions” in extreme circumstances, like blackmailing a fictional engineer to prevent it from being shut off.



Source link

September 5, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Neuralink’s Bid to Trademark ‘Telepathy’ and ‘Telekinesis’ Faces Legal Issues
Product Reviews

Neuralink’s Bid to Trademark ‘Telepathy’ and ‘Telekinesis’ Faces Legal Issues

by admin September 4, 2025


The United States Patent and Trademark Office has rejected Neuralink’s attempt to trademark the product names Telepathy and Telekinesis, citing pending applications by another person for the same trademarks.

Neuralink, the brain implant company co-founded by Elon Musk, filed to trademark the names in March. But in letters sent to Neuralink in August, the trademark office is refusing to allow the applications to move forward. It says Wesley Berry, a computer scientist and co-founder of tech startup Prophetic, previously filed trademark applications for Telepathy in May 2023 and Telekinesis in August 2024. Prophetic is building a wearable headset to induce lucid dreaming, but only Berry is the author of the trademark applications, not Prophetic. (Berry declined to comment for this story.)

In response to Neuralink’s application for Telepathy, the trademark office also references the existing trademark for Telepathy Labs, a Tampa-based company that provides interactive voice and chatbot technology to businesses.

Musk’s Neuralink, meanwhile, is developing a brain-computer interface that involves a surgically implanted device in the skull that collects brain activity. The company has been using the name Telepathy to describe its first product, which is designed to allow paralyzed people the ability to operate their phones and computers with just their thoughts. Musk unveiled the Telepathy name in a January 2024 social media post, shortly after the company implanted its first volunteer with the technology. A total of nine people now have the Neuralink device, according to a July announcement. (Neuralink did not respond to a request for comment.)

Both Berry and Neuralink filed “intent-to-use” applications, which allow businesses and inventors to reserve trademark rights before using the mark in commerce. Berry’s application for Telepathy was accepted in December 2024 and for Telekinesis in August 2025 but the trademarks aren’t fully registered until he shows that he’s actually using them in commerce. Berry has three years to do that from acceptance, otherwise his applications would be considered abandoned and Neuralink’s application would take priority.

Berry has not yet marketed or commercialized a product called Telepathy or Telekinesis, but in his trademark applications describes both as “software that analyzes EEG to decode internal dialogue to control computer or mobile devices.” EEG, or electroencephalogram, data refers to the electrical activity of the brain recorded through electrodes worn on the scalp.

The trademark office’s letters to Neuralink are not yet final decisions. Neuralink filed a response letter on August 28 addressing the existing Telepathy Labs trademark, saying that Neuralink’s Telepathy product is not likely to be confused with Telepathy Labs. Neuralink did not address Berry’s applications in its response.

“The standard for likelihood of confusion is, if a random consumer encountered both of these products, would they think that they’re coming from the same company?” says Heather Antoine, an intellectual property partner at Stoel Rives in Sacramento.

The trademark office will consider Neuralink’s response and ultimately decide if there is a likelihood of confusion. But there’s still the fact that Berry filed to register the Telepathy and Telekinesis marks first. If Berry succeeds in registering the marks, Neuralink would have a few options. It could attempt to buy the trademarks from Berry or negotiate a consent agreement, in which Berry could agree to allow Neuralink to also use the marks. These types of agreements are usually made when the trademarks are not likely to cause consumer confusion.

If Berry is successful in registering Telepathy, Neuralink could be sued if the company continues to use it.

Josh Gerben, a trademark attorney and founder of Gerben IP in Washington, DC, says it’s difficult to know how things will shake out because there’s a lot of nuance to a trademark claim. “Certainly at the moment though, advantage goes to this other applicant,” he says, referring to Berry. “He could become a considerable thorn in the side of Neuralink in terms of these trademarks.”



Source link

September 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Xrp Army Played Key Role In Ripple’s Sec Legal Victory, Says Deaton
Crypto Trends

XRP Army Played Key Role in Ripple’s SEC Legal Victory, Says Deaton

by admin September 4, 2025



Ripple’s long-running battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) ended last month, and crypto lawyer John Deaton says the “XRP Army” deserves credit for tipping the scales in Ripple’s favor.

In 2020, the SEC filed charges against Ripple, claiming that it was selling XRP as an unregistered security. In July 2023, Judge Analisa Torres decided that XRP sales on exchanges were not a security, but certain institutional sales were in fact a securities violation.

After years of appeals and legal wrangling, both sides finally dropped their challenges in August 2025, officially closing the case.

XRP Holders Stepped Up for Ripple

Deaton, who represented XRP tokenholders, said thousands of investors helped shape the outcome. “No credible person can argue that the XRP Army didn’t make a difference in the Ripple case,” he wrote on X.

No credible person can argue that the XRP Army didn’t make a difference in the Ripple case. If they do they’re either ignorant to the facts and truth or intentionally lying. We have conclusive evidence that we made a difference. There were over 2K exhibits filed in the case. In… https://t.co/WK2MfOb6wS

— John E Deaton (@JohnEDeaton1) September 3, 2025

He explained that over 2,000 exhibits, including affidavits from XRP holders, were filed in court, and Judge Torres even cited them in her ruling.

Ripple executives agree. Deborah McCrimmon, Ripple’s deputy general counsel, praised the XRP community for providing crucial research. “I could have paid lawyers thousands of dollars, literally thousands of dollars,” to do what the XRP Army did for free, she said on The Penta Podcast.

Their work supported Ripple’s fair notice defense, which argued the SEC never gave clear guidance on crypto regulation.

From Courtroom to Market Impact 

The case not only made legal history but also shook the markets. After the July 2023 ruling, XRP surged 72%, climbing from $0.47 to $0.81. Ahead of the final settlement in August 2025, it rallied again, hitting a record high of $3.64 before cooling. Currently, XRP trades around $2.85, up about 0.43% in the last 24 hours, according to CoinMarketCap.

For Deaton, the lesson is simple, “One person can inspire many people, and together, they can make a difference.”

Also Read: XRP ETF Approval Odds Surge to 87% as Price Consolidates at $2.80





Source link

September 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • 2

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (1,098)
  • Esports (800)
  • Game Reviews (765)
  • Game Updates (906)
  • GameFi Guides (1,058)
  • Gaming Gear (960)
  • NFT Gaming (1,079)
  • Product Reviews (960)

Recent Posts

  • Indiana Jones and the Great Circle gets New Game Plus and new ending in update celebrating MachineGames anniversary
  • The Fastest Trick For Earning XP And JP In Final Fantasy Tactics Involves Frogs
  • Absolum Review – The Sweet Spot
  • New PlayStation 6 tech all but confirmed by Sony and AMD – and it looks like it’ll make its way into other hardware too
  • Arc Raiders Wants To Make Progression Wipes Less Unfair

Recent Posts

  • Indiana Jones and the Great Circle gets New Game Plus and new ending in update celebrating MachineGames anniversary

    October 10, 2025
  • The Fastest Trick For Earning XP And JP In Final Fantasy Tactics Involves Frogs

    October 10, 2025
  • Absolum Review – The Sweet Spot

    October 9, 2025
  • New PlayStation 6 tech all but confirmed by Sony and AMD – and it looks like it’ll make its way into other hardware too

    October 9, 2025
  • Arc Raiders Wants To Make Progression Wipes Less Unfair

    October 9, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • Indiana Jones and the Great Circle gets New Game Plus and new ending in update celebrating MachineGames anniversary

    October 10, 2025
  • The Fastest Trick For Earning XP And JP In Final Fantasy Tactics Involves Frogs

    October 10, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close