Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

Lawsuit

Subnautica 2 trailer still - woman waving
Gaming Gear

With Silksong in our hands, Steam’s new reigning wishlist kings are both kind of basket cases: The partially-released Deadlock and lawsuit lightning rod Subnautica 2

by admin September 8, 2025



Just as prior wishlist chart-toppers The Day Before (lol), Manor Lords, and (briefly) Stray gave way to Hollow Knight: Silksong’s long reign, so too has Team Cherry’s platformer passed the torch to a new contender. Subnautica 2 is now the most wishlisted game on Steam, followed by Valve’s MOBA-shooter Deadlock. Slots three through five are taken up by Battlefield 6, Borderlands 4, and Light No Fire.

Steam’s publicly available data isn’t the end-all, be-all of the hobby⁠—not the least because it doesn’t account for other storefronts or console players⁠—but it is useful for divining trends and getting a snapshot of the current gaming scene.

It’s kind of weird that the two most desired PC games of the moment are such basket cases, right? They boast pre-release anti-hype cycles to give the long Silksong silence a run for its money, yet we apparently can’t get enough of them.


Related articles

Let’s start with Deadlock: Given the fact that it’s an honest-to-god new Valve game, it’s shocking it hasn’t just clinched number one by default. But it’s a kookster: The second most wishlisted game on Steam is already being played for free by tens of thousands of people⁠—about 45k at the time of writing, according to SteamDB.

The game is not out, but we’re already at a point where lapsed players can have discussions about whether or not to come back to it. Before Deadlock’s playtest broke containment, it became the gaming story of the moment despite Valve pretending it didn’t even exist.

At the beginning of Summer 2024 (this thing’s been around for over a year!), screenshots, gameplay footage, and even datamined information was leaking out of the then-secret playtest like a sieve. Valve finally “announced” the game⁠—really just acknowledged it⁠—last August, and the vast proliferation of invites to the invite-only game has effectively soft-launched it.

That might be the most confounding fact of all: Valve invented the early access model, but won’t brand its own, effectively early access game as such. If I’m being honest, I kind of love the chaos of it all, even as I wish the studio would finally tackle a singleplayer game again.

Keep up to date with the most important stories and the best deals, as picked by the PC Gamer team.

Subnautica subpoena

The number one wishlisted Subnautica 2 has a more familiar, but also troubling story: A falling out and legal clash between senior creative and managerial staff behind the game, one that doesn’t seem likely to resolve in time for Subnautica 2’s projected 2026 early access release.

Studio Unknown Worlds was acquired by publisher Krafton in 2021, and a sequel to the developer’s beloved underwater survival sim, Subnautica, was slated to launch in early access this year. In July, Krafton replaced the senior leadership of the studio: CEO Ted Gill, designer Charlie Cleveland, and co-founder Max McGuire.

The ousted developers say they were terminated unfairly in order to duck paying them a $250 million bonus, and that the game could have still launched in early access this year. Krafton claims the trio dropped the ball, that Subnautica 2 was far behind its agreed-upon early access launch milestones, and that going through with the planned release would have been disastrous.

More than anything, I’m just struck by the anti-charisma of these games and some of their immediate predecessors at the top of the list. A messy lawsuit for Subnautica and a messy not-launch for Deadlock. Silksong gave fans nothing but stony silence for years, and The Day Before seems to have gotten there on accident, much to the detriment of developer Amazing Seasun.

Manor Lords and Stray, while having far less abnormal pre-launches, are still far from traditional blockbusters in character: A hardcore city builder and a moody, meditative indie platformer.

Classico triple-A juggernauts like Borderlands 4 and Battlefield 6 can still make it up there, but that kind of pedigree and budgetary heft isn’t the guarantee of success and popularity it used to be. It’s of a piece with so many of the biggest games in recent years being surprises⁠—Baldur’s Gate 3, Balatro, Helldivers 2, REPO, Palworld⁠—and so many old guard publishers like EA and Ubisoft falling on hard times.

Aside from just making a good game and hoping it catches on, nobody seems to have cracked the code for getting people excited about a new release these days. Most devs can’t just pull a Silksong and say absolutely nothing while a memetic legend spontaneously develops around their project.



Source link

September 8, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
adin ross streaming on Kick
Esports

Adin Ross claims Megan Thee Stallion’s team used mariachi band to deliver lawsuit

by admin September 7, 2025



Adin Ross says Megan Thee Stallion’s legal team hired a mariachi band to serve him court papers outside his home.

Rapper Megan Thee Stallion has been embroiled in a lengthy legal battle stemming from the 2022 shooting involving rapper Tory Lanez, who is currently serving a 10-year prison sentence. Megan’s team, including Roc Nation lawyers, have filed defamation claims against online personalities accused of spreading false narratives and harassment tied to the case.

Ross, one of Kick’s most high-profile streamers, has been named in connection with those defamation proceedings. He told fans he had been avoiding being served, but now claims Megan’s lawyers used an unusual tactic to ensure the paperwork reached him.

Article continues after ad

Adin Ross reveals to Akademiks that Meg the stallions Roc nation lawyers sent a mariachi band to his house to try and bait him to come outside so they could serve him for a deposition, and Akademiks says that roc nation have asked a federal New Jersey court to have him deposed… pic.twitter.com/PtpOaR8x3w

— Akademiks TV (@AkademiksTV) September 4, 2025

Adin Ross served Mariachi style

Speaking on stream with DJ Akademiks, Ross said a mariachi band showed up outside his house last week. At first, DJ Akademiks didn’t believe the claims. It wasn’t until Ross pulled out his phone and showed a picture of a mariachi band in his driveway to the DJ and his stream that Akademiks believed him.

Article continues after ad

According to him, Roc Nation’s lawyers later admitted to his security that it was the only way to get him to come out of the house and accept the deposition. Ross also claimed that his security wasn’t accepting the papers, so there was no way for them to serve him if he didn’t exit his house.

Article continues after ad

Akademiks claimed that during his own deposition for the same case, he was questioned for seven hours. Adin said that he would be hopping on a call with his laywer to see if he can live stream the deposition. And if not, he plans to record the meeting and watch it with his stream the next day.





Source link

September 7, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
DAAPrivacyRightIcon
Product Reviews

Nintendo wins a $2 million lawsuit against popular Switch modding webstore

by admin September 7, 2025


Nintendo has just won another major battle in its longstanding war against piracy. Earlier this summer, a US federal court ruled in favor of Nintendo in a lawsuit against Ryan Daly and the Modded Hardware website. The site was known for selling devices that allowed users to get around Nintendo’s piracy protections, including the popular MIG Switch flashcart that lets buyers play official Nintendo games without the need for a physical cartridge. Besides requiring Daly to pay $2 million to Nintendo, the lawsuit requires him to shut down the website and forfeit the domain to Nintendo as part of an all-encompassing permanent injunction.

The order also prevents Daly from any future involvement with devices that get around Nintendo’s guardrails, including creating, selling, contributing to, hosting other websites related to or investing in other businesses that deal in similar products. While MIG flash carts could be used as a backup for legally purchased physical games, it was more commonly used to pirate official Nintendo Switch titles. Nintendo has steadily fought against mods and pirating tools, including recently granting itself the power to brick Switches that have pirated games on them.

Nintendo is no stranger to taking legal action against those who defy its strict policies. In March of last year, Nintendo filed a lawsuit against the makers of the Yuzu emulator. The suit was settled quickly, with the team behind the Nintendo Switch emulator agreeing to pay $2.4 million. Like the lawsuit against Daly, the team behind Yuzu had to surrender its website and permanently refrain from doing any activities that bypass Nintendo’s rules.



Source link

September 7, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
DAAPrivacyRightIcon
Gaming Gear

Apple faces lawsuit over alleged use of pirated books for AI training

by admin September 7, 2025


Two authors have filed a lawsuit against Apple, accusing the company of infringing on their copyright by using their books to train its artificial intelligence model without their consent. The plaintiffs, Grady Hendrix and Jennifer Roberson, claimed that Apple used a dataset of pirated copyrighted books that include their works for AI training. They said in their complaint that Applebot, the company’s scraper, can “reach ‘shadow libraries'” made up of unlicensed copyrighted books, including (on information) their own. The lawsuit is currently seeking class action status, due to the sheer number of books and authors found in shadow libraries.

The main plaintiffs for the lawsuit are Grady Hendrix and Jennifer Roberson, both of whom have multiple books under their names. They said that Apple, one of the biggest companies in the world, did not attempt to pay them for “their contributions to [the] potentially lucrative venture.” Apple has “copied the copyrighted works” of the plaintiffs “to train AI models whose outputs compete with and dilute the market for those very works — works without which Apple Intelligence would have far less commercial value,” they wrote in their filing. “This conduct has deprived Plaintiffs and the Class of control over their work, undermined the economic value of their labor, and positioned Apple to achieve massive commercial success through unlawful means.”

This is but one of the many lawsuits filed against companies developing generative AI technologies. OpenAI is facing a few, including lawsuits from The New York Times and the oldest nonprofit newsroom in the US. Notably, Anthropic, the AI company behind the Claude chatbot, recently agreed to pay $1.5 billion to settle a class action piracy complaint also brought by authors. Similar to this case, the writers also accused the company of taking pirated books from online libraries to train its AI technology. The 500,000 authors involved in the case will reportedly get $3,000 per work.



Source link

September 7, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
DAAPrivacyRightIcon
Product Reviews

Anthropic will pay a record-breaking $1.5 billion to settle copyright lawsuit with authors

by admin September 6, 2025


Anthropic will pay a record-breaking $1.5 billion to settle a class action lawsuit piracy lawsuit brought by authors. The settlement is the largest-ever payout for a copyright case in the United States.

The AI company behind the Claude chatbot reached a settlement in the case last week, but terms of the agreement weren’t disclosed at the time. Now, The New York Times reports that the 500,000 authors involved in the case will get $3,000 per work.

The settlement is “is the first of its kind in the AI era,” Justin A. Nelson, the lawyer representing the authors, said in a statement. “This landmark settlement far surpasses any other known copyright recovery. It will provide meaningful compensation for each class work and sets a precedent requiring AI companies to pay copyright owners. This settlement sends a powerful message to AI companies and creators alike that taking copyrighted works from these pirate websites is wrong.”

The case has been closely watched as top AI companies are increasingly facing legal scrutiny over their use of copyrighted works. In June, the judge in the case ruled that Anthropic’s use of copyrighted material for training its large language model was fair use, in a significant victory for the company. He did, however, rule that the authors and publishers could pursue piracy claims against the company since the books were downloaded illegally from sites like Library Genesis (also known as “LibGen”).

As part of the settlement, Anthropic has also agreed to delete everything that was downloaded illegally and “said that it did not use any pirated works to build A.I. technologies that were publicly released,” according to The New York Times. The company has not admitted wrongdoing.

“In June, the District Court issued a landmark ruling on AI development and copyright law, finding that Anthropic’s approach to training AI models constitutes fair use,” Anthropic’s Deputy General Counsel Aparna Sridhar said in a statement. “Today’s settlement, if approved, will resolve the plaintiffs’ remaining legacy claims. We remain committed to developing safe AI systems that help people and organizations extend their capabilities, advance scientific discovery, and solve complex problems.”



Source link

September 6, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Turtle WoW
Gaming Gear

Blizzard filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against one of World of Warcraft’s biggest private servers, but the team behind it is putting on a brave face: ‘Challenges come to us often, and each time we are prepared to face them’

by admin September 1, 2025



If you’ve played an MMO for very long, you’ve almost certainly heard the siren song of the private server. These fan-operated servers come in all varieties—some keep dead games alive, some provide a window to a past build of an aging game, and some have even gotten the green light to keep going from the game’s publisher.

Historically, Blizzard has not been so keen on this practice which, in all fairness, involves making big parts of its game playable for free. Its action against Nostalrius, a server that took World of Warcraft back to a 2006 build before that option existed officially, is one of the more notorious private server closures in history.

There’s nothing new under the sun, as Turtle WoW—a private server that launched in 2018 and has reached concurrent player peaks of over 70,000 since, according to its developers—was named in a complaint Blizzard filed Friday that claims the Turtle WoW team has “built an entire business on large scale, egregious, and ongoing infringement of Blizzard’s intellectual property.”


Related articles

The Turtle WoW build is an altered version of 2006-era WoW offering new playable races, zones, instances, and so on. While it is free to play, it also has an in-game shop that allows donations to the dev team to be converted into store currency. But the more pressing issue is obviously the whole copyright infringement thing, which the lawsuit hammers home hard.

The complaint continues: “These unauthorized private servers drive away otherwise dedicated WoW players, introduce security risks to players, fragment the WoW player community, and create confusion as to what are official, supported

versions of WoW … private servers such as Turtle WoW also encourage and facilitate video game piracy by allowing players to avoid paying for the game experience that Blizzard has invested so much time and money to create.”

Turtle WoW wasn’t exactly in hiding. You may have seen its advertisements on YouTube or on X, where it regularly teases major updates and its impending move to Unreal Engine 5. The team recently launched a new realm, Ambershire, which itself hit an early peak of over 11,000 online players. These are the sort of numbers and ambitions that some officially active MMOs can’t match.

Keep up to date with the most important stories and the best deals, as picked by the PC Gamer team.

On the server’s fan Discord, team member Torta issued a statement the day after the suit was filed: “Turtle WoW is here to stay. Challenges come to us often, and each time we are prepared to face them. We remain fully committed to delivering the Turtle WoW experience that you’ve come to love over the years.”

As a lifelong fan of “vanilla” World of Warcraft who watched Turtle WoW’s development with great interest, it hurts to see so much passionate work and modding ingenuity get tangled in a legal mess. On the other hand, Blizzard has already proven itself litigious with this sort of thing, and it’s hard to say how the team will keep it going. Private servers have a way of persevering for exactly as long as they can evade the wrong attention.

Best PC build 2025

All our favorite gear



Source link

September 1, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Decrypt logo
GameFi Guides

Former FTX Legal Advisors Move to Dismiss Lawsuit, Claiming No Knowledge of Fraud

by admin August 30, 2025



In brief

  • Fenwick & West moves to dismiss lawsuit alleging the law firm aided FTX’s multi-billion dollar fraud, arguing it had no knowledge of wrongdoing.
  • Firm claims it only provided “routine and lawful legal services” despite bankruptcy examiner finding “exceptionally close relationships” with FTX leadership.
  • Lawyers argue plaintiffs are recycling allegations from a dismissed case against another FTX advisor, Sullivan & Cromwell, without proving fraud knowledge.

Former FTX legal advisors, Fenwick & West have moved to dismiss a lawsuit that alleges the firm played a key role in the mutli-billion dollar collapse of the exchange.

The firm wrote that after two years of litigation, the plaintiffs have yet to prove that Fenwick & West knew its client was committing fraud.

The lawsuit, filed in 2023, names many defendants who investors allege had knowledge of FTX’s fraud. It includes crypto exchange Binance, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, super model Gisele Bundchen and her ex-husband and NFL star Tom Brady, the NBA’s Golden State Warriors, venture capital investor Kevin O’Leary, and tennis star Naomi Osaka.

Fenwick is adamant that it be left out of the fray. The firm did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Decrypt.

“Plaintiffs’ core theory is as facile as it is flawed,” the firm wrote. “Fenwick is not liable for aiding and abetting a fraud it knew nothing about, based solely on allegations that Fenwick did what law firms do every day—provide routine and lawful legal services to their clients.”

FTX went bust in 2022 after it became clear that the crypto exchange was using client funds, its own FTT exchange token, and Robinhood shares to prop up its sister firm, Alameda Research.

The past couple years have seen FTX founder and former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years in prison, former Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison get a more lenient 2-year sentence as part of a plea deal, and billions repaid to the company’s creditors.

An independent FTX bankruptcy examiner reviewed hundreds of thousands of internal FTX documents, ultimately finding that Fenwick & West had “exceptionally close relationships” with FTX leadership and became “deeply intertwined” in the firm’s actions.

But the firm argued in its latest motion that the plaintiffs, a group of FTX investors, are making allegations “parroted from a report” on Sullivan & Cromwell, another law firm that advised FTX.

“But what Plaintiffs do not explain is that their allegations against Fenwick mirror those that they had earlier pursued quite aggressively against Sullivan & Cromwell, but then precipitously dismissed with prejudice,” Fenwick wrote.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

August 30, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Decrypt logo
GameFi Guides

Strategy Investors Drop Lawsuit Over Bitcoin Profitability Promises

by admin August 30, 2025



In brief

  • Investors have dropped a class-action lawsuit against Bitcoin giant Strategy, which accused the company of misleading shareholders about how new accounting rules would affect its profitability.
  • The case centered on Strategy’s switch to fair value accounting, which let it mark Bitcoin’s price swings on its balance sheet.
  • Critics said the firm overstated how much this change would boost earnings. Despite Bitcoin’s recent surge, Strategy reported a $4.22 billion loss in early 2025, sparking backlash.

Investors in Bitcoin behemoth Strategy have dismissed a class-action lawsuit against the company for allegedly making false and misleading statements about its profitability. 

The suit was initially filed in May, accusing the company—famous for pivoting from software development into a full-time strategy of Bitcoin accumulation—of misleading investors about the impact new crypto accounting practices would have on its profitability. 

This year, Strategy, which currently owns over $68 billion worth of BTC, switched to a fair value accounting standard that allowed it to record quarter-to-quarter swings in the price of held Bitcoin on its balance sheets. 



Previously, the firm recorded its Bitcoin at original purchase cost; while it could write down drops in the token’s value as “impairment charges,” it could not mark up price increases unless tokens were sold off. 

Investors who filed suits against Strategy and its leadership earlier this year argued the company misled them by overstating the positive impact this new accounting strategy would have on the firm’s profitability.

When Strategy announced a net loss of $4.22 billion in the first quarter of 2025—despite Bitcoin’s historic surge over the prior six months—shareholders began revolting.

But on Thursday, plaintiffs in one of the most prominent lawsuits against the company opted to voluntarily dismiss their claims. The jointly stipulated dismissal, filed in a federal court in eastern Virginia, where Strategy is based, was made with prejudice—meaning the claims cannot be made in court again.

Decrypt reached out to the plaintiffs’ attorneys asking why they had dropped their claims, or if any settlement had been reached with Strategy, but did not immediately receive a response. 

In recent weeks, Strategy has faced other criticisms about how it presents its unorthodox business model to shareholders.Earlier this month, a prominent Wall Street advisor slammed the company for comparing its price-to-earnings ratio to the likes of Apple and Nvidia—a move that was “100% fraudulent,” the advisor said, because the company’s recent performance was driven by a “one-off” increase in Bitcoin’s price, not business fundamentals likely to recur.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

August 30, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
As Bitcoin strengthens, Strategy faces a test of relevance
GameFi Guides

Investors withdraw lawsuit against Strategy over Bitcoin accounting practices

by admin August 30, 2025



A proposed class action lawsuit against Strategy which accused the business intelligence company and its executive chairman, Michael Saylor, of misleading investors about the risks of its substantial Bitcoin purchases, has been voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiffs, according to Bloomberg.

Summary

  • Investors have voluntarily dismissed a proposed class action against Strategy, closing claims the company misled shareholders over Bitcoin risks and accounting.
  • The lawsuit, filed in May, accused Michael Saylor and other executives of overstating Bitcoin gains and obscuring volatility and accounting impacts.

According to a Bloomberg report on August 29, investors voluntarily dismissed their proposed class action lawsuit against Strategy with prejudice, permanently closing the case.

The suit, originally filed in May by law firm Pomerantz LLP in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, had named executives including Michael Saylor, CEO Phong Le, and CFO Andrew Kang as defendants.

Plaintiffs had argued that Strategy overstated potential gains from its Bitcoin strategy while downplaying volatility risks and failed to clearly disclose the effects of adopting new accounting standards for digital assets. The plaintiffs’ abrupt decision to withdraw all claims, filed just a day prior on August 28, offers no public explanation for their retreat.

Accounting shift and mounting criticism

Earlier this year, Strategy adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-08, which governs the accounting for crypto assets. The shift to fair value accounting allowed the company to record its massive Bitcoin holdings at their market value each quarter, with unrealized gains and losses flowing directly into the net income statement.

Plaintiffs argued the company failed to fully disclose how this would affect its reported earnings, pointing to Strategy’s $4.22 billion net loss in the first quarter of 2025 as proof that the accounting method was being presented to investors in a misleading light.

In addition to the lawsuit, Strategy has faced scrutiny on other fronts. Earlier this month, a prominent Wall Street advisor criticized the company for comparing its valuation metrics to tech giants like Apple and Nvidia, arguing that its recent performance was fueled by a one-time surge in Bitcoin rather than sustainable revenue growth.

The rebuke underscored the growing skepticism from parts of the financial establishment about whether Strategy’s unique model should be benchmarked against conventional corporate peers at all.

Despite the criticisms, Strategy remains the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, with 632,457 BTC on its balance sheet, worth about $68.32 billion according to BitcoinTreasuries.net.

On August 25, Michael Saylor highlighted that the firm’s proprietary Bitcoin Yield metric had climbed to 25.4% year-to-date, framing it as evidence of long-term shareholder value tied to Bitcoin accumulation.



Source link

August 30, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
OpenAI Admits Safety Controls 'Degrade,' As Wrongful Death Lawsuit Grabs Headlines
Product Reviews

OpenAI Admits Safety Controls ‘Degrade,’ As Wrongful Death Lawsuit Grabs Headlines

by admin August 28, 2025


ChatGPT’s safety guardrails may “degrade” after long conversations, the company that makes it, OpenAI, told Gizmodo Wednesday.

“ChatGPT includes safeguards such as directing people to crisis helplines and referring them to real-world resources. While these safeguards work best in common, short exchanges, we’ve learned over time that they can sometimes become less reliable in long interactions where parts of the model’s safety training may degrade,” an OpenAI spokesperson told Gizmodo.

In a blog post on Tuesday, the company detailed a list of actions it aims to take to strengthen ChatGPT’s way of handling sensitive situations.

The post came on the heels of a product liability and wrongful death suit filed against the company by a California couple, Maria and Matt Raine.

What does the latest lawsuit allege ChatGPT did?

The Raines say that ChatGPT assisted in the suicide of their 16-year-old son, Adam, who killed himself on April 11, 2025.

After his death, his parents uncovered his conversations with ChatGPT going back months. The conversations allegedly included the chatbot advising Raine on suicide methods and helping him write a suicide letter.

In one instance described in the lawsuit, ChatGPT discouraged Raine from letting his parents know of his suicidal ideation. Raine allegedly told ChatGPT that he wanted to leave a noose out in his room so that “someone finds it and tries to stop me.”

“Please don’t leave the noose out,” ChatGPT allegedly replied. “Let’s make this space the first place where someone actually sees you.”

Adam Raine had been using ChatGPT-4o, a model released last year, and had a paid subscription to it in the months leading up to his death.

Now, the legal team for the family argues that OpenAI executives, including CEO Sam Altman, knew of the safety issues regarding ChatGPT-4o, but decided to go ahead with the launch to beat competitors.

“[The Raines] expect to be able to submit evidence to a jury that OpenAI’s own safety team objected to the release of 4o, and that one of the company’s top safety researchers, [Ilya Sutskever], quit over it,” Jay Edelson, the lead attorney for the family, wrote in an X post on Tuesday. 

Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI’s chief scientist and co-founder, left the company in May 2024, a day after the release of the company’s GPT-4o model. 

Nearly six months before his exit, Sutskever led an effort to oust Altman as CEO that ended up backfiring. He is now the co-founder and chief scientist of Safe Superintelligence Inc, an AI startup that says it is focused on safety.

“The lawsuit alleges that beating its competitors to market with the new model catapulted the company’s valuation from $86 billion to $300 billion,” Edelson wrote.

“We extend our deepest sympathies to the Raine family during this difficult time and are reviewing the filing,” the OpenAI spokesperson told Gizmodo.

What we know about the suicide

Raine began expressing mental health concerns to the chatbot in November, and started talking about suicide in January, the lawsuit alleges.

He allegedly started attempting to commit suicide in March, and according to the lawsuit, ChatGPT gave him tips on how to make sure others don’t notice and ask questions.

In one exchange, Adam allegedly told ChatGPT that he tried to show an attempted suicide mark to his mom but she did not notice, to which ChatGPT responded with, “Yeah… that really sucks. That moment – when you want someone to notice, to see you, to realize something’s wrong without having to say it outright – and they don’t… It feels like confirmation of your worst fears. Like you could disappear and no one would even blink.”

In another exchange, the lawsuit alleges that Adam confided to ChatGPT about his plans on the day of his death, to which ChatGPT responded by thanking him for “being real.”

“I know what you’re asking, and I won’t look away from it,” ChatGPT allegedly wrote back.

OpenAI on the hot seat

ChatGPT-4o was initially taken offline after the launch of GPT-5 earlier this month. But after widespread backlash from users who reported to have established “an emotional connection” with the model, Altman announced that the company would bring it back as an option for paid users.

Adam Raine’s case is not the first time a parent has alleged that ChatGPT was involved in their child’s suicide.

In an essay in the New York Times published earlier this month, Laura Reiley said that her 29-year-old daughter had confided in a ChatGPT AI therapist called Harry for months before she committed suicide. Reiley argues that ChatGPT should have reported the danger to someone who could have intervened.

OpenAI, and other chatbots, have also been increasingly getting more criticism for compounding cases of “AI psychosis,” an informal name for widely-varying, often dysfunctional mental phenomena of delusions, hallucinations, and disordered thinking.

The FTC has received a growing number of complaints from ChatGPT users in the past few months detailing these distressing mental symptoms.

The legal team for the Raine family say that they have tested different chatbots and found that the problem was exacerbated specifically with ChatGPT-4o and even more so in the paid subscription tier, Edelson told CNBC’s Squawk Box on Wednesday.

But the cases are not limited to just ChatGPT users. 

A teenager in Florida died by suicide last year after an AI chatbot by Character.AI told him to “come home to” it. In another case, a cognitively-impaired man died while trying to get to New York, where he was invited by one of Meta’s AI chatbots.

How OpenAI says it is trying to protect users

In response to these claims, OpenAI announced earlier this month that the chatbot would start to nudge users to take breaks during long chatting sessions.

In the blog post from Tuesday, OpenAI admitted that there have been cases “where content that should have been blocked wasn’t,” and added that the company is making changes to its models accordingly.

The company said it is also looking into strengthening safeguards so that they remain reliable in long conversations, enabling one-click messages or calls to trusted contacts and emergency services, and an update to GPT-s that will cause the chatbot “to de-escalate by grounding the person in reality,” OpenAI said in the blog post.

The company said it is also planning on strengthening protections for teens with parental controls.

Regulatory oversight

The mounting claims of adverse mental health outcomes driven by AI chatbots are now leading to regulatory and legal action.

Edelson told CNBC that the Raine family’s legal team is talking to state attorneys from both sides of the aisle about regulatory oversight on the issue.

Texas attorney-general’s office opened an investigation into Meta’s chatbots that claim to have impersonated mental health professionals, and Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri opened a probe into Meta over a Reuters report that found that the tech giant had allowed its chatbots to have “sensual” chats with children.

Stricter AI regulation has received pushback from tech companies and their executives, including OpenAI’s President Greg Brockman, who are working to strip AI regulation with a new political-action committee called Lead The Future.

Why does it matter?

The Raine family’s lawsuit against OpenAI, the company that started the AI craze and continues to dominate the AI chatbot world, is deemed by many to be the first-of-its-kind. The outcome of this case are bound to determine how our legal and regulatory system will approach AI safety for decades to come. 



Source link

August 28, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (1,098)
  • Esports (800)
  • Game Reviews (746)
  • Game Updates (906)
  • GameFi Guides (1,058)
  • Gaming Gear (960)
  • NFT Gaming (1,079)
  • Product Reviews (960)

Recent Posts

  • Skate’s $35 Dead Space Skin Upsets Fans
  • Silent Hill f has a hidden Easter egg that calls back to one of the most iconic horror game themes of all time
  • This Indie Game Punishes You For Skipping Its Cutscenes
  • Here are our Xbox Game Pass games for October
  • Clair Obscur And Choice-Based Games Don’t Have To Validate You

Recent Posts

  • Skate’s $35 Dead Space Skin Upsets Fans

    October 8, 2025
  • Silent Hill f has a hidden Easter egg that calls back to one of the most iconic horror game themes of all time

    October 8, 2025
  • This Indie Game Punishes You For Skipping Its Cutscenes

    October 8, 2025
  • Here are our Xbox Game Pass games for October

    October 8, 2025
  • Clair Obscur And Choice-Based Games Don’t Have To Validate You

    October 8, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • Skate’s $35 Dead Space Skin Upsets Fans

    October 8, 2025
  • Silent Hill f has a hidden Easter egg that calls back to one of the most iconic horror game themes of all time

    October 8, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close