Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

jail

johnny somali with his tongue sticking out
Esports

Real lawyer claims Caseoh would get 3,000 years in jail for Goob Lagoon waterpark ‘crimes’

by admin September 30, 2025



Real-life lawyer and content creator ‘LawByMike’ launched an ‘investigation’ into Caseoh’s fictional Goob Lagoon waterpark, finding it liable for hundreds of millions of dollars.

No, Twitch streamer Caseoh doesn’t actually own a waterpark in real life. However, his ‘Goob Lagoon’ waterpark in the game Waterpark Simulator has gone so viral that it’s no surprise some folks might think it’s a real place.

Caseoh’s streams playing the game have taken over social media, prompting fans to literally buy billboards and even rent out space on the sides of trucks advertising the nonexistent park.

Article continues after ad

Specifically, the amount of ‘injuries’ and ‘deaths’ from guests at Goob Lagoon have become an inside joke within the fanbase that has now expanded to the real world, even resulting in fans making an official-looking website to help ‘injured guests’ seek compensation.

Although Caseoh’s adventures at Goob Lagoon are now over, the streams grew so popular that an actual lawyer looked into the fictional waterpark to see exactly how deep in legal trouble it would be, if it were an actual business.

Article continues after ad

Article continues after ad

Lawyer says Caseoh would owe $400M for ‘crimes’ at Goob Lagoon

‘LawByMike’ is an experienced attorney based out of Los Angeles, California. He has practiced law in a variety of areas, such as personal injury, criminal defense, entertainment, and more.

On top of having his own practice, he also creates videos on YouTube, where he delves into the legal side of popular creators’ lives and breaks down the legal system for his 15 million subscribers.

In a September 30 upload, LawByMike looked into Caseoh’s Goob Lagoon, where he analyzed the many incidents of ‘injury’ caused to guests by dangerous water slides, slipping on puddles, and even getting walloped by Caseoh himself for spraying graffiti in the park.

Article continues after ad

Mike also pointed out violations of health codes and OSHA regulations, such as when Caseoh discovered trash bags and human waste inside the Goob Lagoon swimming pools. According to LawByMike, each violation is considered a separate incident, racking up thousands of dollars and lots of jail time.

Article continues after ad

Of course, he couldn’t just skip over the moment when Caseoh tased someone swimming in a pool, electrocuting and killing everyone inside it.

“Now we’re looking at mass murder,” Mike said. “We’ve got three counts of murder here. Caseoh’s going away for life. Depending on where he lives, the death penalty could happen here.”

Article continues after ad

He did, however, note that Caseoh could argue he didn’t know what would happen if he used the taser in the pool — but found that defense “weak” and unlikely to sway a judge.

Using Caseoh’s daily park reports, Mike found that there were around 22 estimated deaths at the Goob Lagoon, along with numerous health code violations, OSHA violations, and employment lawsuits, resulting in a hypothetical fine of $399 million.

Combined with other lawsuits from employees and fines from code violations, he estimated the number to be closer to $400M — and that’s not including the jail time Caseoh would have to face.

Article continues after ad

Article continues after ad

For the ‘crimes’ of criminal negligence, battery, battery with a deadly weapon, involuntary manslaughter, and second-degree murder, Mike hypothesized Caseoh would spend around 3,000 years in jail.

“This is the scariest waterpark I’ve ever seen,” Mike remarked. “…Caseoh, I loved reacting to you playing this game. Everyone should watch more of this series.”

Thus far, Caseoh has not reacted to his hypothetical prison sentence — but knowing his viewers, it won’t be long until the news gets to him. Unfortunately, his run at the Goob Lagoon is over… but it’s probably for the best, given all the (fake) legal trouble.

Article continues after ad



Source link

September 30, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Can Luigi Mangione get too big to jail?
Gaming Gear

Can Luigi Mangione get too big to jail?

by admin September 16, 2025


The first people in line on Tuesday, I was told, started camping out on the sidewalk two days ago. Luigi Mangione, the man accused of gunning down UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December 2024, was due in court at 9AM ET for a hearing in one of three concurrent criminal cases against him. And this time everyone was prepared for the mayhem: the signs, the fans, the livestreamers, the protests, the media circus. That’s why the line started even earlier than last time — the people who really wanted to get in to see him knew that no time was too early.

Mangione is both ubiquitous and fleeting. The last time the public saw him (aside from a bizarre, unauthorized appearance in a men’s shirt listing on Shein) was in February at this same courthouse in Manhattan, when hundreds of members of the general public and media convened for a routine pretrial hearing. He exists in memes, in passing references, and in content moderation decisions, and he lives rent-free in the mind of Donald Trump — yet most people are likely not thinking or talking about Mangione day to day. They are reminded of him when new photos drop or when there are incremental updates in the cases against him. But the wall-to-wall coverage of the case has waned, and it’s the people who are the most tapped in that are working to keep interest in the case alive. Mangione and the larger discussions around healthcare reform are one item in a list of approximately 8,000 pressing topics swirling in the US. How do you keep attention and energy alive in an information ecosystem defined by its fragmentation?

Court officials and police seem to have learned their lesson from February: don’t let a million people inside

The hearing on Tuesday was much more eventful than the one in February: Mangione’s team successfully got two terrorism-related charges tossed in the New York case, a development that supporters of his are celebrating. Given the magnitude of the news, the tempered atmosphere — and the smaller crowds — was noticeable.

Court officials and police seem to have learned their lesson from February: don’t let a million people inside. Instead of admitting members of the public to a hallway outside the courtroom where they could set up camp, the court kept most on the sidewalk.

There are fewer people here than in February, but in some ways the supporters and frenzy are even more fervent. Mason Alexander, who told The Verge he’d been one of the few to make it inside the courtroom for the first hearing, arrived at 11PM the night before and was 25th in line, meaning he wouldn’t get a spot the second time. Some in line have numbers written on the backs of their hands, which I later am told are not part of any official numbering system from the courthouse but were the work of an attendee walking around with a marker, trying to bring order to the line.

“The case just resonated with me,” Alexander says, explaining why he showed up. “Obviously what he allegedly did isn’t something to be cheered about, but I think it was beneficial in the way that it put a spotlight on [the healthcare system issue] that I think is probably the most important in the country, and how much it affects everyday people. It got people talking.”

People Over Profit NYC, a grassroots healthcare reform group with a focus on Mangione’s case, again organized a rally outside. A giant homemade spinning wheel has slots reading “APPROVED” and “DENIED” — spin the wheel to learn the fate of your insurance claim. There are Luigi hats, keychains, DIY T-shirts, flyers about local healthcare legislation. When I arrive shortly after 8AM, reporters and news crews outnumber rally attendees — there are fewer people here, too, than six months ago.

A POPNYC rally attendee who asked to remain anonymous, citing the current political climate, says “protest fatigue” could be a reason attendance dipped (the early morning timeslot also may have contributed).

“I think people are just tired, and they just want to either ignore what’s going on or just give up,” the attendee says. “That’s why we’re out here, to let them know we’re still here. Even if you’re tired, we’ll still go on. And maybe they’ll join us next time.”

There’s also the unavoidable reality that the hearing is happening a week after right-wing provocateur Charlie Kirk was killed at a public event in Utah. Though the two cases are not obviously connected, there’s been a swift and brutal crackdown from the American right wing, directed at anyone who is deemed to be “celebrating” Kirk’s murder. Private and in some cases innocuous social media posts are being used to report people to employers or dox them. It’s not surprising that Mangione supporters may be reluctant to be photographed at a rally for him.

It’s hard enough to keep major events and causes in the news, but Mangione’s case has unique, complicating factors. The central character — who many see as sympathetic — is accused of stalking and shooting Thompson point-blank (Mangione has pleaded not guilty). UnitedHealth Group has waged an all-out attack on critics, targeting filmmakers, social media users, and news outlets. Tech companies are working to moderate Mangione-related content, though some supporters complain that their content and accounts are being taken down without explanation. There is also the general specter of violence that clouds current US political discourse. It’s never a good time to be an alleged assassin, but especially not now.

Part of what makes the Brian Thompson murder case so strange is the way most people consume and follow it: through the hundreds of photos and videos of Mangione looking “hot.” Mangione’s overlapping and high-stakes legal battle is relayed to the public via new photos of him; it obfuscates both the seriousness of the crime and charges, as well as the punishment he faces if convicted. There is a clear tonal disconnect in coverage of the case: the Daily Mail is both running stories about the “sick” fans that support him and posting 29-photo slideshows to TikTok that are a collection of Mangione’s face from every possible angle.

On Tuesday, Mangione wore a khaki prison outfit instead of street clothes. He was once again shackled at the ankles, wrists, and waist — something his attorneys have complained about. As we waited for him to enter, another reporter remarked that it felt a bit like a wedding: the press and two dozen or so members of the public kept glancing back at the slightest of noises, like we were waiting for a bride to walk down the aisle. A supporter who managed to get into the courtroom, who asked to be named as SAS, later told me she could hear his shackles before she saw him. Some online commenters described him as looking “pale,” “skinny,” and like he had been “crying a lot.” (I’m not really seeing this, personally.) After both hearings, there’s been a lot of reading into Mangione’s demeanor — but the truth is that the court dates have been exceedingly normal and professional. There is no deeper personality or psychology to be gleaned from being inside a room with him for 20 minutes.

The most significant development from Tuesday’s hearing brought good news for Mangione: Judge Gregory Carro, who is overseeing the New York state case against Mangione, dropped two major terrorism-related charges in what is seen as a major win for the defense. The state argued that Thompson’s murder was meant to “intimidate or coerce a civilian population,” but Carro found the claims to be “legally insufficient.” Carro says in essence that under New York law, the alleged “ideological” motive doesn’t fit the definition of terrorism.

As Carro announced that he was dropping the terrorism charges, a few supporters in the courtroom audibly reacted

“The court agrees with the defendant that the [state] appear[s] to conflate an ideological belief with the intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population,” Carro writes. “While the defendant was clearly expressing an animus toward UHC, and the health care industry generally, it does not follow that his goal was to ‘intimidate and coerce a civilian population,’ and indeed, there was no evidence presented of such a goal.” Mangione still faces charges of second-degree murder in the New York state case.

As Carro announced that he was dropping the terrorism charges, a few supporters in the courtroom audibly reacted — a faint exclamation, maybe even a gentle clap, that drew a scolding from a guard.

On other motions, Mangione’s defense was less successful. Mangione is facing three concurrent cases: the one in New York, a separate state case in Pennsylvania, and a federal case. Mangione’s defense team has argued that the state and federal cases happening at the same time amounts to double jeopardy: the US Constitution bars defendants from being prosecuted for the same crime twice. Carro rejected the double jeopardy argument. Mangione’s lawyers have also argued that the federal case against him — which carries the possibility of the death penalty — should proceed before the state case. On Tuesday, Carro denied Mangione’s request to put the state case on hold. The next hearing in the state case is scheduled for December 1st. Mangione is due in court for the federal case a few days later.

Luigi Mangione’s fate and his public persona are inextricably linked. Widespread and sustained attention on his case depends on how often he can get in front of people through their digital feeds. The windows of opportunity to grab attention and deeper public engagement are limited because he is making public court appearances only once every several months. The public spectacle of the case is ever-present: Mangione’s attorneys have written at length objecting to him being shackled during court appearances that are then photographed and shared, saying they are “deeply prejudicial” and damaging to his right to a fair trial.

One avenue Mangione supporters have been pursuing is around jury nullification, when a jury acquits even if it believes a defendant committed a crime (in February, a truck with an LED billboard on the side showing jury nullification information circled the courthouse during the hearing). But even that relies on a massive public outreach campaign in an era of short attention spans and a fractured media ecosystem.

As I wrote in February, a cycle is beginning to take shape: One day Mangione is all we see on social media. The next he is gone. Rinse and repeat. While I was in court with my phone tucked away, friends texted me about new Luigi photos, just as they did six months ago. Is becoming a meme — no matter how beloved or reviled — enough to have your life spared? The stakes couldn’t be higher, and the culture couldn’t be more fickle.

0 CommentsFollow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

  • Mia SatoClose

    Mia Sato

    Features Writer, The Verge

    Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All by Mia Sato

  • CultureClose

    Culture

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Culture

  • EntertainmentClose

    Entertainment

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Entertainment

  • Internet CultureClose

    Internet Culture

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Internet Culture

  • LawClose

    Law

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Law

  • PolicyClose

    Policy

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Policy

  • PoliticsClose

    Politics

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Politics

  • ReportClose

    Report

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Report

  • Social MediaClose

    Social Media

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Social Media

  • TechClose

    Tech

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Tech





Source link

September 16, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
DeFi
NFT Gaming

Writing Defi Code Won’t Land You In Jail

by admin August 22, 2025


Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

In a major policy shift, federal prosecutors are changing how they approach decentralized finance, or Defi.

After years of uncertainty around liability for coders and software developers, officials are now drawing a clear line between creating technology and committing a crime.

The US Justice Department has announced it will no longer target software developers who build Defi platforms without proof of criminal intent.

Acting Assistant Attorney General Matthew Galeotti made the remarks Thursday during a digital assets summit in Wyoming. He said that writing code alone does not constitute a crime.

This signals a significant change from earlier enforcement strategies where prosecutors charged developers for operating unlicensed money transmission businesses.

Debate Over Money Transmission Rules

Regulators have long applied stringent rules to companies in the money remittance business, but the rise of Defi systems is putting those standards to the test.

Traditional payment platforms face clear obligations, while DeFi projects say those same rules don’t make sense in a code-driven environment.

Money transmitters such as PayPal and Cash App must secure licenses and comply with anti-money laundering obligations. They also have to verify customers and report suspicious transactions.

But decentralized exchanges argue these rules don’t fit their model since they have no control over user activity on their platforms.

NEW: US DOJ’S ACTING AAG MATTHEW GALEOTTI SAYS “OUR VIEW IS THAT MERELY WRITING CODE, WITHOUT ILL INTENT, IS NOT A CRIME. INNOVATING NEW WAYS FOR THE ECONOMY TO STORE AND TRANSMIT VALUE AND CREATE WEALTH, WITHOUT ILL INTENT, IS NOT A CRIME”https://t.co/iyGVBr0BCZ

— DEGEN NEWS (@DegenerateNews) August 21, 2025

Source: Getty Images

On Defi, Hiding Money & Ill Intent

The issue came under the spotlight after a New York jury recently convicted Roman Storm, co-founder of Tornado Cash, on conspiracy charges linked to operating an unlicensed money transmitting business.

Tornado Cash is a privacy service specifically designed to make Defi and cryptocurrency transactions more difficult to trace.

Jurors could not reach a decision on whether Storm committed money laundering or violated sanctions.

Prosecutors said the service allowed illicit finance, while critics of the case argued Storm had only written code.

Total crypto market cap currently at $3.7 trillion. Chart: TradingView

Prosecutors Will Prioritize Evidence Of Intent

According to Galeotti, future cases in the Defi and crypto space will require proof that a developer knowingly aided fraud, sanctions evasion, or laundering.

“Innovating new ways for the economy to store and transmit value and create wealth, without ill-intent, is not a crime,” he said.

He added that laws banning unlicensed money transmission will not apply to developers unless there is evidence of deliberate wrongdoing.

The focus of the US justices will remain on fraud, Ponzi schemes, and global laundering networks, including those based in China and other countries suspected of carrying out illicit transactions.

Featured image from Getty Images, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.





Source link

August 22, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Holding Bitcoin Might Result in Jail Time for Pennsylvania Officials
Crypto Trends

Holding Bitcoin Might Result in Jail Time for Pennsylvania Officials

by admin August 22, 2025


A bill that bans holding Bitcoin for public officials as well as their immediate families has been introduced in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives.

The legislative effort (HB1812) aims to change the state’s ethics and financial disclosure laws in order to prevent public officials from having exposure to the nascent asset class. 

Apart from Bitcoin, public officials would also be barred from holding alternative cryptocurrencies (including memecoins), non-fungible tokens, and even stablecoins. 

They would not be able to hold crypto through funds, trusts, or funds. The same applies to cryptocurrency derivatives as well as exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which have gained significant adoption over the past year. 

The state’s officials would be required to divest their digital asset holdings within two months of taking office. Moreover, they would also be prohibited from owning crypto a year after leaving their government jobs. 

Potential jail time

If a public official fails to comply with these requirements, he or she could face a civil penalty of up to $50,000. 

It should also be noted that violations under the Ethics Act could be punishable as felonies with imprisonment. 

Will it pass? 

The recently introduced bill has now been referred to the Committee on State Government.

For now, it remains at the very beginning of the legislative process, meaning that it remains unclear whether the bill will eventually pass. 

Crypto holders in Congress 

For now, there are no restrictions preventing members of Congress from holding Bitcoin. However, they are supposed to comply with existing disclosure laws. 

Several members of Congress from both the Republican and the Democratic parties have previously disclosed crypto holdings. They include Michael Collins (R-GA), Barry Moore (R-AL), Jeffrey Jackson (D-NC), and so on.



Source link

August 22, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (1,098)
  • Esports (800)
  • Game Reviews (739)
  • Game Updates (906)
  • GameFi Guides (1,058)
  • Gaming Gear (960)
  • NFT Gaming (1,079)
  • Product Reviews (960)

Recent Posts

  • Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 will receive new update with “a bit of whee and a bit of whoo”, as studio celebrates new sales milestone
  • LEGO’s Final Prime Day Generosity, Star Wars Ahsoka Ghost and Phantom II Spaceship Hits Lowest Price
  • Broken Sword sequel gets Reforged treatment after last year’s “reimagining”, out next year
  • Samsung Offloads Its Old T7 External SSDs, Now Selling for Pennies on the Dollar at Amazon
  • Voila! Nintendo quietly shares new details on Samus’s motorbike in Metroid Prime 4

Recent Posts

  • Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 will receive new update with “a bit of whee and a bit of whoo”, as studio celebrates new sales milestone

    October 8, 2025
  • LEGO’s Final Prime Day Generosity, Star Wars Ahsoka Ghost and Phantom II Spaceship Hits Lowest Price

    October 8, 2025
  • Broken Sword sequel gets Reforged treatment after last year’s “reimagining”, out next year

    October 8, 2025
  • Samsung Offloads Its Old T7 External SSDs, Now Selling for Pennies on the Dollar at Amazon

    October 8, 2025
  • Voila! Nintendo quietly shares new details on Samus’s motorbike in Metroid Prime 4

    October 8, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 will receive new update with “a bit of whee and a bit of whoo”, as studio celebrates new sales milestone

    October 8, 2025
  • LEGO’s Final Prime Day Generosity, Star Wars Ahsoka Ghost and Phantom II Spaceship Hits Lowest Price

    October 8, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close