Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

FTC

As Microsoft lays off thousands and jacks up Game Pass prices, former FTC chair says I told you so: The Activision-Blizzard buyout is 'harming both gamers and developers'
Gaming Gear

As Microsoft lays off thousands and jacks up Game Pass prices, former FTC chair says I told you so: The Activision-Blizzard buyout is ‘harming both gamers and developers’

by admin October 4, 2025



As Microsoft slashes jobs and raises prices, former US Federal Trade Commission chair Lina Khan has taken to X to say that the company’s actions since completing its acquisition of Activision Blizzard in 2023 is pretty much what the FTC warned would happen when it opposed the deal.

Khan, you may recall, was head of the FTC when it challenged Microsoft’s proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard, a convoluted process that didn’t formally end until May of 2025—almost two years after the deal closed.

“Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision has been followed by significant price hikes and layoffs, harming both gamers and developers,” Khan wrote on X. “As we’ve seen across sectors, increasing market consolidation and increasing prices often go hand-in-hand.


Related articles

“As dominant firms become too-big-to-care, they can make things worse for their customers without having to worry about the consequences.”

Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision has been followed by significant price hikes and layoffs, harming both gamers and developers. As we’ve seen across sectors, increasing market consolidation and increasing prices often go hand-in-hand. As dominant firms become… https://t.co/FoI50tlEsLOctober 3, 2025

Well, when you’re right, you’re right, and it’s hard to argue that Khan wasn’t right on this one. The FTC filed a lawsuit to block the deal in 2022 over concerns that the impact of the proposed acquisition was “reasonably likely to substantially lessen competition and/or tend to create a monopoly in both well-developed and new, burgeoning markets” if it was allowed to go through.

Microsoft and Activision, of course, insisted otherwise: Bobby Kotick, then the CEO of Activision Blizzard, said in a July 2023 statement that the merger “will benefit consumers and workers,” and also “enable competition rather than allow entrenched market leaders to continue to dominate our rapidly growing industry.”

The deal was closed in October 2023, even though the FTC’s legal action against it was still pending, and it’s been one shitty thing after another since then. Just a few months after the deal was sealed, Microsoft laid off 1,900 workers at Activision Blizzard and Xbox, and cancelled the studio’s long-awaited survival game; then in September 2024, another 650 people were shown the door. That was followed by the layoff of 9,000 more employees across Microsoft in July 2025, a spot of unpleasantness that also saw multiple game cancellations, the closure of The Initiative, and knock-on impacts on other studios, even as Xbox boss Phil Spencer said the company’s gaming business “never looked stronger.”

Keep up to date with the most important stories and the best deals, as picked by the PC Gamer team.

Meanwhile, in case you hadn’t heard, the cost of Game Pass Ultimate and PC Game Pass also jumped significantly this week. Which is actually the second price hike for Game Pass since the Activision Blizzard deal was concluded: The FTC had some harsh words for the previous (and, ironically, much smaller) price increase in July 2024.

Khan was replaced as chair of the FTC in January 2025 by incoming president Donald Trump, so her comments on X don’t carry any regulatory weight. But even if this is a hollow I-told-you-so, I’d say it’s a well-earned one.






Source link

October 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
DAAPrivacyRightIcon
Product Reviews

The Supreme Court will hear former FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter’s case

by admin September 23, 2025


The Supreme Court has voted 6-3 in favor of hearing a lawsuit brought by a former member of the US Federal Trade Commission, CNBC reports. Democrats Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya were fired from their posts as commissioners in the FTC by President Donald Trump in March. As has been the case with several of the Trump administration’s actions to remove possible critics from their roles in civil service, the pair said their dismissal was illegal.

Commissioners’ terms may only be ended early for good cause under a law designed to protect the FTC as an independent agency. The FTC is also not allowed to have more than three commissioners from a single political party, meaning Slaughter and Bedoya could not both be replaced by additional Republican members.

In July, US District Judge Loren AliKhan ruled in favor of Slaughter, who has moved ahead with a suit to contest her dismissal, and a federal appeals court reinstated her to the FTC in September. Today, however, the Supreme Court ruled that her firing may stand while it considers her case.



Source link

September 23, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
DAAPrivacyRightIcon
Product Reviews

FTC investigating ad sale practices at Google and Amazon

by admin September 13, 2025


The Federal Trade Commission is investigating whether Amazon and Google misled advertisers regarding the pricing and terms for their ads. As first reported by Bloomberg, the investigation is being conducted by the agency’s consumer protection unit, and centers around the auction-style sale of advertising space by the companies.

Google sells ads using automated auctions that run after a user enters a search query. These auctions take place in less than a second. Amazon uses real-time auctions to place ads within its listings, which users would recognize as “sponsored listings” or “sponsored ads” when searching for specific products.

The investigation questions whether Amazon disclosed so-called “reserve pricing” for some of its ads, which is a price floor that advertisers must meet before they can buy an ad. For Google’s part, the FTC is looking at certain practices by the search giant including its internal pricing process and whether it was surreptitiously increasing the cost of ads in ways that advertisers weren’t privy to.

The FTC isn’t the only federal agency keeping a close eye on big tech. Earlier this year, a federal judge ruled that Google held a monopoly in online ad tech after the Department of Justice (DOJ) sued to break up the giant’s ad business. Google also recently escaped mostly unscathed from a Department of Justice monopoly case involving its Chrome browser.

FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson has previously said that big tech is one of the agency’s top priorities. These investigations move forward against a backdrop of top tech CEOs continuing to try to curry favor with President Trump via lavish personal gifts and sweeping (if potentially unrealistic) promises of investment in the US economy.



Source link

September 13, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Microsoft logo
Gaming Gear

‘Microsoft has become like an arsonist selling firefighting services to their victims’ says US senator, referring it to the FTC for a cybersecurity flaw, though Microsoft says it has a plan

by admin September 12, 2025



US senator Ron Wyden has written a letter to the FTC requesting that the organisation investigate Microsoft for what he calls “gross cybersecurity negligence.” His complaint is primarily related to a form of encryption still supported by the company’s Windows operating system, which the senator’s office believes is vulnerable to ransomware attacks.

In the letter [PDF warning], Senator Wyden reveals that an investigation his office conducted into a ransomware breach of healthcare provide Ascension last year found that support of the RC4 encryption cipher was a direct contributor to the attack (via Ars Technica).

“Because of dangerous software engineering decisions by Microsoft, which the company has largely hidden from its corporate and government customers, a single individual at a hospital or other organization clicking on the wrong link can quickly result in an organization-wide ransomware infection,” said Wyden.


Related articles

“Microsoft has utterly failed to stop or even slow down the scourge of ransomware enabled by its dangerous software.”

RC4, or Rivest Cipher 4, was developed in 1987 by mathematician and cryptographer Ron Rivest, and was considered a protected method of encryption until 1994, when it was compromised as a result of a leaked technical description. Despite this, RC4 was widely used in common encryption protocols until around a decade ago, and is still used by Microsoft to secure Active Directory, a Windows component used by system administrators to configure user accounts.

(Image credit: Witthaya Prasongsin via Getty Images)

While Windows will use AES encryption by default, the senator’s office discovered that Windows servers will still respond to RC4-based authentication requests, which potentially opens them up to “Kerberoasting.” This is a technique in which administrative privileges are gained via exploiting encryption on one affected machine in order to install ransomware on others.

In the case of Ascension, the senator claims that a contractor clicking on a malicious link led to hackers “moving laterally” within its server network, exploiting the weak encryption in order to push ransomware to thousands of other other computers in the organisation and ultimately stealing the sensitive data of 5.6 million patients.

Keep up to date with the most important stories and the best deals, as picked by the PC Gamer team.

While the senator says that his office contacted Microsoft about the vulnerability, and that the company eventually posted a blog post with actions that organisations could take to protect against it, a promised security update to fix the issue is yet to arrive.

(Image credit: Future)

“The Ascension hack illustrates how it is Microsoft’s customers, and, ultimately, the public, who bear the cost of Microsoft’s dangerous software engineering practices and the company’s refusal to inform its customers about the pressing need to adopt important cybersecurity safeguards,” the senator continues.

“There is one company benefiting from this status quo: Microsoft itself. Instead of delivering secure software to its customers, Microsoft has built a multibillion dollar secondary business selling cybersecurity add-on services to those organizations that can afford it. At this point, Microsoft has become like an arsonist selling firefighting services to their victims”


Related articles

The senator ends his letter by urging the FTC to investigate Microsoft, and hold the company responsible for what the senator claims is the “serious harm it has caused by delivering dangerous, insecure software to the U.S. government and to critical infrastructure entities, such as those in the U.S. health care sector.”

(Image credit: Maciej Toporowicz, NYC via Getty Images)

Microsoft has since released a statement to multiple outlets, including Ars Technica, directly addressing the senator’s claims:

“RC4 is an old standard, and we discourage its use both in how we engineer our software and in our documentation to customers – which is why it makes up less than .1% of our traffic. However, disabling its use completely would break many customer systems,” the company said.

“For this reason, we’re on a path to gradually reduce the extent to which customers can use it, while providing strong warnings against it and advice for using it in the safest ways possible. We have it on our roadmap to ultimately disable its use. We’ve engaged with The Senator’s office on this issue and will continue to listen and answer questions from them or others in government.”

Microsoft also says that in the first quarter of 2026, “Any new installations of Active Directory Domains using Windows Server 2025 will have RC4 disabled by default, meaning any new domain will inherently be protected against attacks relying on RC4 weaknesses. We plan to include additional mitigations for existing in-market deployments with considerations for compatibility and continuity of critical customer services.”

Best gaming PC 2025

All our current recommendations



Source link

September 12, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Decrypt logo
GameFi Guides

AI Giants Face FTC Inquiry Into Chatbot Safety and Child Protections

by admin September 12, 2025



In brief

  • The FTC has issued orders to seven companies requiring detailed disclosure of safety protocols and monetization strategies within 45 days.
  • The probe comes amid growing concerns about AI chatbots’ impact on children, with safety advocates calling for stronger protections.
  • Companies must reveal user data handling by age group and safeguards preventing inappropriate interactions with minors.

The Federal Trade Commission issued compulsory orders Thursday to seven major technology companies, demanding detailed information about how their artificial intelligence chatbots protect children and teenagers from potential harm.

The investigation targets OpenAI, Alphabet, Meta, xAI, Snap, Character Technologies, and Instagram, requiring them to disclose within 45 days how they monetize user engagement, develop AI characters, and safeguard minors from dangerous content.

Recent research by advocacy groups documented 669 harmful interactions with children in just 50 hours of testing, including bots proposing sexual livestreaming, drug use, and romantic relationships to users aged between 12 and 15.

“Protecting kids online is a top priority for the Trump-Vance FTC, and so is fostering innovation in critical sectors of our economy,” FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson said in a statement.

The filing requires companies to provide monthly data on user engagement, revenue, and safety incidents, broken down by age groups—Children (under 13), Teens (13–17), Minors (under 18), Young Adults (18–24), and users 25 and older.

The FTC says that the information will help the Commission study “how companies offering artificial intelligence companions monetize user engagement; impose and enforce age-based restrictions; process user inputs; generate outputs; measure, test, and monitor for negative impacts before and after deployment; develop and approve characters, whether company- or user-created.”

Building AI guardrails

“It’s a positive step, but the problem is bigger than just putting some guardrails,” Taranjeet Singh, Head of AI at SearchUnify, told Decrypt.

The first approach, he said, is to build guardrails at the prompt or post-generation stage “to make sure nothing inappropriate is being served to children,” though “as the context grows, the AI becomes prone to not following instructions and slipping into grey areas where they otherwise shouldn’t.”

“The second way is to address it in LLM training; if models are aligned with values during data curation, they’re more likely to avoid harmful conversations,” Singh added.

Even moderated systems, he noted, can “play a bigger role in society,” with education as a prime case where AI could “improve learning and cut costs.”



Safety concerns around AI interactions with users have been highlighted by several cases, including a wrongful death lawsuit brought against Character.AI after 14-year-old Sewell Setzer III died by suicide in February 2024 following an obsessive relationship with an AI bot.

Following the lawsuit, Character.AI “improved detection, response and intervention related to user inputs that violate our Terms or Community Guidelines,” as well as a time-spent notification, a company spokesperson told Decrypt at the time.

Last month, the National Association of Attorneys General sent letters to 13 AI companies demanding stronger child protections.

The group warned that “exposing children to sexualized content is indefensible” and that “conduct that would be unlawful—or even criminal—if done by humans is not excusable simply because it is done by a machine.”

Decrypt has contacted all seven companies named in the FTC order for additional comment and will update this story if they respond.

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.



Source link

September 12, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Disney corporate logo on a phone screen
Gaming Gear

Disney Settles FTC Complaint With YouTube Over Children’s Data Collection

by admin September 4, 2025


Disney will pay a $10 million penalty over allegations that it mislabeled videos on YouTube and allowed personal data to be collected from children without notifying parents or getting their consent, the FTC said in an announcement on Tuesday.

The complaint filed in a US District Court alleged that Disney uploaded videos to YouTube in channels that defaulted to “Not Made For Kids” when the videos should have been labeled “Made For Kids.”

Due to the mislabeling, videos intended for children collected more information than they should have and used that information to target advertising to children under 13, the FTC said. The error, which enabled features like autoplay on the videos, allegedly violated COPPA, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule.

“Supporting the well-being and safety of kids and families is at the heart of what we do. This settlement does not involve Disney-owned and operated digital platforms, but rather is limited to the distribution of some of our content on YouTube’s platform,” a Disney spokesperson told CNET. “Disney has a long tradition of embracing the highest standards of compliance with children’s privacy laws, and we remain committed to investing in the tools needed to continue being a leader in this space.”

In addition to the $10 million civil penalty for allegedly violating COPPA, Disney has agreed to ensure COPPA compliance by notifying parents and getting consent for videos that are “Not Made For Kids” and establishing a review program on how videos should be labeled. According to the FTC, “this forward-looking provision reflects and anticipates the growing use of age assurance technologies to protect kids online.” 

Separately, the FTC also took COPPA-related action against toy maker Apitor Technology, which makes robots aimed at children ages 6 to 14. The FTC alleges the company collected geolocated information from children via a third-party app in China. The FTC is imposing a $500,000 penalty.

When even big companies ‘miss the mark’

Since COPPA was passed in 1998, technology that can reach young people has evolved dramatically, but enforcement hasn’t eased off as regulators shift their expectations of how companies should comply. That can be a challenge even for companies like Disney.

“For any company that interacts with children or collects children’s data, getting privacy compliance right means investing in the internal knowledge and resources to meet these evolving standards,” said Cobun Zweifel-Keegan, managing director of the Washington, DC office of the nonprofit IAPP.

In addition to the federal rules, there are also state laws that companies have to keep up with. 

“This means more protections for consumers and families. It also means a lot of work for privacy teams in a wide variety of organizations,” Zweifel-Keegan told CNET. “As standards change, and given the complex ecosystem involved in providing kids with a safe online experience, even businesses that invest a lot in privacy compliance can miss the mark.

“When they don’t, they can miss the mark by a wider margin.”

Disney has missed the mark on child privacy before, however: in 2011, the company paid a $3 million FTC fine over similar allegations against its Playdom social networking service. 

“If a company with Disney’s reputation is doing this, you can bet many other brands, big and small, are too,” said Mark Weinstein, a privacy expert and author of Restoring Our Sanity Online. “Disney is one of the most trusted brands in the world, yet they knowingly broke the rules. YouTube reportedly warned them in 2019, but Disney still went on for years collecting ad revenue likely worth millions of dollars while hoping they wouldn’t get caught.”

Weinstein said there’s emerging legislation that may do more to protect kids from targeted ads and other online dangers, especially amid the emergence of AI and increased spyware. “Fines alone won’t solve this because dominant companies like Disney and Google pay them as ‘costs of doing business,'” Weinstein said.



Source link

September 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
DAAPrivacyRightIcon
Product Reviews

Disney will pay $10 million to settle FTC complaint that it collected children’s data on YouTube

by admin September 2, 2025


The Federal Trade Commission announced that Disney will pay $10 million to settle allegations that the entertainment giant allowed data collection on YouTube videos meant for children. Under the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule, also known as COPPA, companies are required to notify parents and obtain parental consent if they collection information from minors. According to the FTC complaint, Disney failed to properly label some YouTube videos as “Made for Kids,” which allowed the company to collect data and deliver targeted ads to viewers younger than 13.

The proposed order from the FTC would also require Disney to create a review process for determining when and how videos are correctly designated with YouTube’s Made for Kids label. YouTube rolled out the Made for Kids tags following a $170 million settlement in 2019 on charges that the video platform had violated COPPA. Google faced an additional settlement of $30 million last month from a similar class-action lawsuit.



Source link

September 2, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
FTC Sues Gym Chains for Making It Hard to Cancel Memberships
Gaming Gear

FTC Sues Gym Chains for Making It Hard to Cancel Memberships

by admin August 20, 2025


The Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit against the operators of several gym chains, including LA Fitness, on Wednesday over allegations that they make it too difficult to cancel memberships. And that’s probably welcome news for anyone who’s had the displeasure of trying to cancel with their gym.

The companies being sued by the FTC are Fitness International and Fitness & Sports Clubs, which own gym chains like Esporta Fitness, City Sports Club, and Club Studio. The largest chain, LA Fitness, has over 600 locations across the U.S.

The 22-page complaint, which has been posted online, details how the FTC believes LA Fitness and others have created a cumbersome process for consumers to cancel. For starters, members are required to log in to their website and print off a cancellation form. But users are encouraged at sign-up to use the LA Fitness app and a QR code, meaning that many people apparently don’t know their login information for the website. There’s no way to cancel through the app, according to the FTC.

Customers who don’t know how to log in with their credentials need to jump through even more hoops to get them. The user must provide the original email address used to get the membership account, the “key tag number” handed out when they signed up, and the first five digits of the bank account or credit card number listed on the account, according to the complaint.

The cancellation form isn’t made publicly available on the company’s website and can only be found after users log in. And the form must be printed out, a very real hurdle for many households in the year 2025.

Even if you figure out how to log in with your credentials and print out the form, customers are required to either mail the form or bring the form to a physical location, where they’ll face even more hurdles. The FTC says customers are required to send cancellation forms via registered or certified mail. And even though most LA Fitness locations are open seven days a week, often for 19 hours a day, cancellations are only accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., when most people are at work.

Nobody really wants to take PTO to cancel their gym membership. And that’s how people can get stuck with gym memberships they no longer want.

The FTC’s press release announcing the lawsuit also alleges that LA Fitness has trained staff to reject requests to cancel by phone or email. And “consumers who try to cancel their memberships by stopping charges to their bank or credit card find they are rebilled, often under new account numbers.” The FTC says that violates the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA). Cancelling with nothing more than a click on the app seems like it would be a reasonable and consumer-friendly way to conduct business.

“The FTC’s complaint describes a scenario that too many Americans have experienced—a gym membership that seems impossible to cancel,” Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a press release.

“Tens of thousands of LA Fitness customers reported difficulties—cancellation was often restricted to specific times or required speaking to specific managers who were often not present or available. The FTC will not hesitate to act on behalf of consumers when it believes companies are stifling consumers’ ability to choose which recurring charges they want to keep.”

LA Fitness is far from the only business that seems to thrive on cumbersome auto-renewal policies. How many times have you signed up for a digital subscription of some kind and failed to cancel before you were charged again? It seems like an increasingly popular business model these days. And the FTC has taken notice.

Fitness International, the operator of LA Fitness, didn’t immediately respond to questions emailed on Wednesday. Gizmodo will update this post when we hear back.



Source link

August 20, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (1,098)
  • Esports (800)
  • Game Reviews (732)
  • Game Updates (906)
  • GameFi Guides (1,058)
  • Gaming Gear (960)
  • NFT Gaming (1,079)
  • Product Reviews (960)

Recent Posts

  • AirPods 4 Are Now 3x Cheaper Than AirPods Pro, Amazon Is Offering Entry-Level Clearance Prices
  • Wildgate Review – A Shipshape Space Race
  • Battlefield 6 physical copies are content complete and require no initial install, according to early copy holders
  • KPop Demon Hunters Uploaded A New Song, But Something’s Off
  • One of Borderlands’ most hated characters seems to have been cut from Borderlands 4

Recent Posts

  • AirPods 4 Are Now 3x Cheaper Than AirPods Pro, Amazon Is Offering Entry-Level Clearance Prices

    October 8, 2025
  • Wildgate Review – A Shipshape Space Race

    October 8, 2025
  • Battlefield 6 physical copies are content complete and require no initial install, according to early copy holders

    October 8, 2025
  • KPop Demon Hunters Uploaded A New Song, But Something’s Off

    October 8, 2025
  • One of Borderlands’ most hated characters seems to have been cut from Borderlands 4

    October 7, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • AirPods 4 Are Now 3x Cheaper Than AirPods Pro, Amazon Is Offering Entry-Level Clearance Prices

    October 8, 2025
  • Wildgate Review – A Shipshape Space Race

    October 8, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close