Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

explains

Football Manager player numbers are through the roof thanks to subscription platforms like Game Pass and Netflix - series boss Miles Jacobson explains how
Game Reviews

Football Manager player numbers are through the roof thanks to subscription platforms like Game Pass and Netflix – series boss Miles Jacobson explains how

by admin September 20, 2025


“It was five, six years ago we celebrated two million players for the first time,” Miles Jacobson tells me, during our lengthy interview with the studio head at Football Manager developer Sports Interactive’s office earlier this summer. Checking that reference, it was indeed 2020 when the studio first announced that figure, with some pride. “And then we’ve really embraced the subscription platforms…”

Those platforms – Xbox Game Pass, PS Plus, Apple Arcade, Netflix and more – have had a marked effect on the series. From 2 million players in 2020, the series’ playerbase has skyrocketed. “As I sit here today,” Jacobson says, in the late summer, “and because I haven’t been on social media these numbers haven’t been [publicly] updated for a long time, so I’m glad you’re sitting down – as of when I last checked, we’re at 19.09 million players. Of which, 7.5 million have played for more than five hours. If you play a game for more than five hours, you tend to play for a lot longer.”

Of those, 2 million people played the game in the month of June alone, Jacobson goes on. “That’s for a game that has been out since November 2023.”

While going through the figures, Jacobson brings up a dashboard on the giant screen he has in his office. Total playtime: 1.7bn hours, for FM24 alone. Average playtime: 118.8 hours, “including all the people that have subscribed and played for an hour and then not come back.” Without those, that figure’s in the many hundreds.

And then the one that stood out the most to me: FM24, as of late this summer, actually had slightly more regular daily players than when it first came out. Two years after release, with no FM25 after that game’s shock cancellation and no additional, official updates or data patches to fill the gap, FM24 is effectively bigger than it’s ever been.

“We have nine times as many players; we have two and a half times the revenue,” Jacobson says, before adding quite understandably: “So we’re really happy with the partnerships.”

Those kinds of partnerships have been in the spotlight of late. Back in July, for instance, Arkane Studios founder Raphael Colantonio called Game Pass the “elephant in the room” of the conversation around Xbox parent company Microsoft’s large-scale layoffs. He referred to it then as an “unsustainable model that has been increasingly damaging the industry for a decade, subsidised by ‘infinite money’, but at some point reality has to hit.” He added, “I don’t think it can co-exist with other models, they’ll either kill everyone else, or give up.”

The sentiment has some backing – in a continued conversation on X with Michael Douse, director of publishing at Baldur’s Gate 3 studio Larian, who broadly echoed those points, Colantonio continued: “I’m fed up with all the bs they fed us at first like ‘don’t worry, it doesn’t impact the sales’, only to admit years later that it totally does.”

It all makes for interesting context for Football Manager’s huge success, something Jacobson attributes quite directly to subscriptions. FM is a relatively unique series of course, in that it’s annualised, has theoretically different audience to ‘core’ games, and is available on such a wide array of platforms, from PC and consoles to tablets and mobile. Nevertheless, Jacobson says there are specific things the studio has done to ensure its success on subscription services.

“We built a whole business model around it,” he says. “You can’t just turn around and do this – this was before we launched on the subscription platforms, we’d been talking about it. And we’d been working out what we were going to do for five years – it was a five-year journey before we went with the first experiment, and then we did another experiment, and then we did another experiment, and then we learned from those experiments, and that’s when the full strategy was put in place.”

Part of that strategy is in building up what Jacobson called a “long-term addressable audience”. In other words: those players who play the game for more than five hours. Essentially they become a kind of insurance against subscription revenue suddenly going away. “If the platforms decided they didn’t want us anymore, we would know that we have a lot more consumers to talk to,” Jacobson explains.

As for that revenue, the specifics of the deals these kinds of platforms make with publishers and developers are quite heavily guarded, but Jacobson could speak broadly to how that worked – how, for instance, does getting nine times more players in a game like Football Manager equate to 2.5 times the revenue, when the games don’t include any real in-game microtransactions for those extra players to spend on?

“Different platforms work in different ways,” he says. “Some of them work in a world of up-front fees and royalties. Some of them work in a way of royalties. Those royalties are different for different platforms, so some are based on eyeballs, some are based on playtimes… So what Epic does with their free weeks is very different to what Microsoft does with Game Pass, very different to what Apple Arcade does. Which is very different to what Amazon Prime Days do, which is very different to what Netflix does.”

An extra upside comes “if your sales don’t drop,” Jacobson adds, meaning a studio such as Sports Interactive gets the revenue from the royalties and revenue from sales of the games they would’ve always had. “We don’t see cannibalisation, which is an absolute key thing. But we work with a publisher that we’ve worked with for a long time, who happens to own us as well, who understands the nature of annual iterations.” The studio also has a five-year plan, Jacobson says, and publisher Sega its own 10-year plans, which factor in the timing for when certain deals might run out.

“We know when our deals are going to run out with these platforms,” Jacobson says. “If we can get a deal that makes sense for us, then we will do the deal that makes sense. If we don’t… we know how many customers have played for more than five hours, so we know what our target number is going to be to hit that year. So it actually helps us, being able to be in a – I can’t say fully ‘no-lose’ situation – but in most cases we’re in a no-lose situation.”

All that has left Jacobson almost unanimously positive about the services, at least in terms of how they’ve worked for Football Manager. “We’d love to stay with the partners, we work very, very well together, and it’s massively increased our audience – but I don’t control their businesses, and with any large business they can pivot, so we’ve protected ourselves from that, and that’s why it was so important to do that long-term plan first.”

As for that painfully protracted wave of layoffs, Jacobson put much of the industry’s difficulty down to games’ increasing competition for attention: “We are in the middle of a battle for eyeballs.”

“We are not just battling time for other games,” he adds. “We’re also battling for the time of people watching TV, people watching YouTube, music, videos – games are battling with streamers over eyeballs, because there’s only one set of eyeballs. It all ties into the same thing… you have games like ours that have huge playtime. You have games like Candy Crush or Clash Royale, but also games like Destiny that have huge, huge playtimes, and we’ve seen a lot more of those coming through.”

All of those games, he goes on, “are battling against everything else. Plus there are more games coming out now than there’ve ever been before. Literally thousands of games coming out each month. Not everything can survive. So the subscription platforms are part of it, but the whole market is part of it as well.”

Likewise, he adds, “you have to be realistic about the situation, which is: if there aren’t enough hours in the day for the games to be played, then there are games that aren’t going to be able to be made. That’s the reality, in my opinion, of what people have been going through the last few years… I think people probably realised there’s just too many games coming out, they can’t all be successful. And the budgets have gone up so much – budgets have gone up exponentially – so you have to sell a lot more than you had to sell five years ago to have a hit game. So it’s a perfect storm.”

That ultimately comes back to Jacobson and the team’s five- and ten-year plans – something which might insulate Football Manager as a series more than other games from the “infinite money” concerns raised above. “We’ve got my COO, we’ve got the comms team, we’ve got the finance team, we’ve got the BI team, and we’ve got the whole of Sega that we worked with to agree on that long-term plan,” Jacobson says. “And then I ruined it all by not releasing FM25.”

You can read much more from Jacobson on what happened to FM25 and what expect from FM26 in our big Football Manager interview with the Sports Interactive gaffer.



Source link

September 20, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Strategy's Saylor Explains Why OGs Are Selling Bitcoin
Crypto Trends

Strategy’s Saylor Explains Why OGs Are Selling Bitcoin

by admin September 19, 2025


  • “Bitcoin rich, fiat poor” 
  • Reducing volatility 

According to Strategy co-founder Michael Saylor, Bitcoin O.G.s are responsible for the recently observed selling pressure. 

“Right now, I think that the selling is [done by] crypto OGs that have had a lot of money for a long time,” he said during a recent podcast appearance. 

Moreover, the market is absorbing all these coins and building its support level.

“Bitcoin rich, fiat poor” 

During his podcast appearance, Saylor explained why long-term holders are suddenly selling their holdings. 

“You’ve got a lot of people that own a lot of Bitcoin, but they can’t get a loan against it. And because they can’t get a loan against it, the only, you know, at the point that you all of a sudden find yourself Bitcoin rich, but fiat poor, you don’t have a lot of dollars, but you have a lot of Bitcoin, and you can’t borrow against it, then you think, I have to go sell it,” Saylor explained. 

You Might Also Like

According to Saylor, Bitcoin resembles a Magnificent 7 startup, where all of a sudden all the employees got insanely rich on penny stock options, but they can’t borrow against them, so they have to sell them.

However, this does not necessarily mean that they have no confidence in the company. 

“It’s just they have kids to go to college. They want to buy a house right they want to live comfortably,” Saylor said. 

Reducing volatility 

According to Saylor, Bitcoin O.Gs selling as “much as they need” is actually beneficial for BTC since it helps to reduce the volatility of the leading cryptocurrency. 

This will ensure that institutions will feel more comfortable when entering BTC.

“You want the volatility to decrease so the mega institutions feel comfortable entering the space in size,” Saylor explained. 



Source link

September 19, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Arca CIO Says Crypto Isn’t in a Bull Market and Explains Why Some Tokens Outperformed
NFT Gaming

Arca CIO Says Crypto Isn’t in a Bull Market and Explains Why Some Tokens Outperformed

by admin September 18, 2025



The chief investment officer of digital asset manager Arca is challenging the idea that 2025 represents a broad-based crypto bull market, arguing that only a handful of large-cap tokens are carrying the industry.

In an X thread posted Tuesday, Jeff Dorman wrote that “more than 75% of tokens in our coverage universe are negative year-to-date, and more than 50% of tokens are down 40% or more YTD.”

He added that some of the year’s few gainers have been “complete nonsense coins and memecoins that no serious investor would even look at,” citing litecoin LTC$115.80 and bitcoin cash BCH$646.06.

By contrast, the best-known names have done relatively well. Bitcoin BTC$117,157.54, ether (ETH), solana SOL$246.05, binance coin BNB$996.68 and XRP are all up between 20% and 40% this year, Dorman said.

He compared the dynamic to traditional finance, where large caps can rally while smaller stocks slump: “This is the TradFi equivalent of the DJIA and GameStop having a good year, while small caps are -40%.”

Dorman argued that this dispersion is ultimately healthy. Broad rallies, he said, breed complacency, while uneven performance forces investors to be more selective. “Nothing good comes from an everything rally, because no one learns anything,” he wrote. When weaker projects falter, he added, investors “start to ask questions like ‘how are you doing this?’”

Unlike in past cycles, he said, investors in 2025 cannot simply rely on momentum across altcoins. Instead, they must prioritize projects with tangible business models. “Own stocks and tokens that actually make money & buy back their own tokens with the profits,” Dorman said. “The days of throwing darts to make a fortune are over (i.e. Alt Season isn’t a thing).”

‘FAANG’ of crypto

According to Dorman, the tokens and companies that have held up in 2025 generally fall into a few categories.

Assets connected to exchange-traded funds or digital asset trusts, such as BTC, ETH and SOL, are leading the way.

Crypto-related equities have also performed well, including Circle, Galaxy Digital, Coinbase and miners like Iris Energy and TeraWulf.

He also pointed to what he called “U.S. government coins,” namely XRP and Chainlink’s LINK token.

Finally, Dormann noted that revenue-generating tokens that distribute value back to holders — among them Hyperliquid’s HYPE, Pump.fun’s PUMP, Maple Finance’s MPL/SKY — have stood out as relative winners.

Earlier this year, Dorman had floated the idea of a crypto equivalent to the “FAANG” stocks. He suggested an acronym called the “BACHELORS”, naming tokens such as BNB, AERO, CAKE, HYPE, ENA, LEO, OKB, RAY and SKY (MKR). In his Sept. 16 thread, he updated that list to the “BARHEAPs,” incorporating newer projects like PUMP.

For Dorman, the lesson of 2025 is that crypto’s growth story is more complicated than headline gains might suggest. He argued that calling the year a “bull market” is misleading, since at best it represents a narrow cycle led by a few majors and select revenue-focused projects.

“The reason this has been a hard bull market is because it’s barely even a good year for crypto, let alone a bull market,” he wrote.



Source link

September 18, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Ripple Explains Stablecoin Approach as Market Surpasses $300 Billion
GameFi Guides

Ripple Explains Stablecoin Approach as Market Surpasses $300 Billion

by admin September 17, 2025


In a recent tweet, Ripple highlights infrastructure as that key element that makes a stablecoin truly useful, with interoperability, transparency and scale underpinning this usability as infrastructure.

According to Jack McDonald, CEO of Standard Custody and SVP of Stablecoins at Ripple, the design of a stablecoin is critical. For a stablecoin to succeed, it must be interoperable across platforms and networks rather than tethered to a single brand.

What makes a stablecoin truly useful? Infrastructure.

As @_JackMcDonald_ highlights, interoperability, transparency, and scale all underpin this usability as infrastructure. https://t.co/8KO0Yn9P0v

And $RLUSD was built on these principles: an enterprise-grade, fully backed…

— Ripple (@Ripple) September 16, 2025

A stablecoin should also provide complete transparency around reserves and redemption and provide the scalability and reliability expected of a core financial infrastructure. In this regard, Ripple is committed to the full transparency of the reserves supporting RLUSD with its monthly reserve reports.

According to McDonald, the above-stated approach is not optional as those features are necessary for mainstream adoption, long-term relevance and the stability that “stablecoin” implies, forming the basis of the RLUSD stablecoin issued on both XRP Ledger and Ethereum.

The current stablecoin market capitalization is $302 billion, according to CoinMarketCap data.

Privacy coming to XRP Ledger

In a recent tweet, RippleX revealed initial discussions of an upcoming amendment that might bring privacy to the XRP Ledger.

Confidential MPT is a spec for the XRP Ledger that would bring privacy to balances and transfers. However, public auditability and validator-enforced checks would remain unchanged, creating a secure financial environment.

Confidential MPTs provide confidential transfers and balances using EC-ElGamal encryption and Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs), while preserving XLS-33 semantics.

This design aligns naturally with XLS-33, which enables flexible tokenization on the XRP Ledger; however, all balances and transfers remain publicly visible, which might limit adoption in institutional and privacy-sensitive contexts. Confidential MPTs address this gap by introducing encrypted balances and confidential transfers while preserving XLS-33 semantics.





Source link

September 17, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Eva and Ice stare into their cameras.
Game Reviews

Ice Cube Explains His Awful War Of The Worlds Movie

by admin September 16, 2025


Last month, Amazon quietly released a new film version of H.G. Wells’ The War of the Worlds. The movie, in which everything we see is happening on computer screens, stars Ice Cube and was a huge flop with critics. It featured a scene where the world is saved thanks to an Amazon drone driver. Seriously. Now, a month later, the rapper and actor has explained how the internet’s favorite bad movie of 2025 came to be.

During a recent livestream marathon hosted by popular creator Kai Cenat, Ice Cube dropped by to talk about his career, his future projects, and just shoot the shit with Cenat and his friends. At one point during the stream, Cenat asked Ice Cube about Amazon’s War of the Worlds. And while Cenat didn’t call it a terrible movie, it was clear that Ice Cube wasn’t particularly happy about the finished product, which apparently was shot half a decade ago in about two weeks.

“[War of the Worlds is a movie] I did in 2020 during the pandemic, five years ago,” Ice Cube told Cenat during the marathon stream. “We shot it in 15 days, and it was during the pandemic. So, the director wasn’t in there. None of the actors was in there. This was the only way we could really shoot the movie. [It was] pandemic time.”

Ice Cube added that this is the reason War of the Worlds is presented entirely as a series of computer screens. He then added: “But really, if shit went down, everybody would only have their screen to look at.”

As for why the movie took five years to release, Ice Cube provided an odd answer, telling Kai Cenat that after Universal sold the movie to Amazon Prime, it “took a minute to finish” the film because of “how it was shot.”

“The movie is shot, the actors are shot, but all the footage is from real surveillance cameras around the world,” claimed Ice Cube. “And they had to build all that shit. So yeah, it took a minute.”

As someone who has watched the movie and flipped through it a few times, I think a lot of the footage featured in it is actually stock footage or content licensed cheaply from some asset library.  But hey, maybe they really did fly around the world collecting original security camera footage for this straight-to-digital low-budget adaptation of a classic novel. That’s possible, too, I guess…?



Source link

September 16, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
U.S. Federal Reserve in Washington .(Jesse Hamilton/CoinDesk)
GameFi Guides

Arthur Hayes Explains Why Complaints About Bitcoin’s Recent Performance Miss the Point

by admin September 14, 2025



Arthur Hayes believes the current crypto bull market has further to run, supported by global monetary trends he sees as only in their early stages.

Speaking in a recent interview with Kyle Chassé, a longtime bitcoin and Web3 entrepreneur, the BitMEX co-founder and current Maelstrom CIO argued that governments around the world are far from finished with aggressive monetary expansion.

He pointed to U.S. politics in particular, saying that President Donald Trump’s second term has not yet fully unleashed the spending programs that could arrive from mid-2026 onward. Hayes suggested that if expectations for money printing become extreme, he may consider taking partial profits, but for now he sees investors underestimating the scale of liquidity that could flow into equities and crypto.

Hayes tied his outlook to broader geopolitical shifts, including what he described as the erosion of a unipolar world order. In his view, such periods of instability tend to push policymakers toward fiscal stimulus and central bank easing as tools to keep citizens and markets calm.

He also raised the possibility of strains within Europe — even hinting that a French default could destabilize the euro — as another factor likely to accelerate global printing presses. While he acknowledged these policies eventually risk ending badly, he argued that the blow-off top of the cycle is still ahead.

Turning to bitcoin, Hayes pushed back on concerns that the asset has stalled after reaching a record $124,000 in mid-August.

He contrasted its performance with other asset classes, noting that while U.S. stocks are higher in dollar terms, they have not fully recovered relative to gold since the 2008 financial crisis. Hayes pointed out that real estate also lags when measured against gold, and only a handful of U.S. technology giants have consistently outperformed.

When measured against bitcoin, however, he believes all traditional benchmarks appear weak.

Hayes’ message was that bitcoin’s dominance becomes even clearer once assets are viewed through the lens of currency debasement.

For those frustrated that bitcoin is not posting fresh highs every week, Hayes suggested that expectations are misplaced.

In his telling, investors from the traditional world and those in crypto actually share the same premise: governments and central banks will print money whenever growth falters. Hayes says traditional finance tends to express this view by buying bonds on leverage, while crypto investors hold bitcoin as the “faster horse.”

His conclusion is that patience is essential. Hayes argued that the real edge of holding bitcoin comes from years of compounding outperformance rather than short-term speculation.

Coupled with what he sees as an inevitable wave of money creation through the rest of the decade, he believes the present crypto cycle could stretch well into 2026, far from exhausted.



Source link

September 14, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
 Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss at the White House in July 2025. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)
GameFi Guides

Galaxy Digital CEO Explains Why This Is the ‘Season of SOL’

by admin September 12, 2025



Solana’s SOL rallied above $239 on Friday, extending its sharp September gains, as Galaxy Digital CEO Mike Novogratz described the blockchain as “tailor-made” for global financial markets and analyst Ali Martinez charted a potential path to $1,314.

Martinez, a well-known crypto analyst, highlighted Solana’s breakout from what chart technicians call a cup-and-handle pattern, a formation that often signals the start of a long-term rally.

In his chart, Martinez marked $1,314.41 as the main technical target, using Fibonacci retracement levels to project Solana’s upside. The pattern reflects a multi-year basing structure: Solana’s deep decline in 2022 and 2023 formed the “cup,” while the sideways consolidation of 2024 and early 2025 formed the “handle.”

According to Martinez, the breakout above resistance near $220 validates the structure and opens the way to much higher levels if momentum persists.

Novogratz, speaking on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” Thursday, laid out a sweeping bull case for Solana and crypto more broadly. He began by pointing to treasury companies tied to both ETH and SOL, which he said are raising billions of dollars and bringing “lots of energy and money” into the digital asset ecosystem.

He then pivoted to bitcoin, predicting the world’s largest cryptocurrency should see a surge toward the end of the year.

But his most detailed remarks focused on Solana and the changing regulatory landscape. Novogratz said U.S. SEC Chair Paul Atkins has made clear that he wants all markets to move on-chain, citing a speech earlier in the week where Atkins declared, “On-chain capital markets and agentic finance are on the horizon, and the world is watching.”

As part of that backdrop, Novogratz flagged Nasdaq’s proposal to the SEC to allow tokenized securities to be traded directly on the Nasdaq Stock Market. Combined with the new U.S. stablecoin framework, he argued, crypto finally has both the technology and the regulatory clarity to serve as financial market infrastructure.

On the technology side, Novogratz emphasized Solana’s raw capacity, saying the blockchain can handle 14 billion transactions per day — enough, in his words, “to process all the transactions in equities, fixed income, commodities and foreign exchange combined.” He went on to call Solana a blockchain that is “tailor-made” for financial markets.

Adding it up — scalable infrastructure, a pro-blockchain regulatory stance and billions in new institutional inflows — Novogratz concluded that “this is the season of SOL,” a moment when Solana is positioned to take a leading role as capital markets shift on-chain.

Technical Analysis Highlights (Sept. 11 15:00 – Sept. 12 14:00 UTC)

  • According to CoinDesk Research’s technical analysis data model, SOL gained about 6% in the 24-hour period, climbing from $227.14 to $240.02, with trading volumes reaching 3.66 million contracts.
  • The token broke above eight months of resistance at $220, hitting $240 for the first time since January as institutional buyers added exposure.
  • The strongest rally occurred in the final hour of trading (13:14–14:13 UTC on Sept. 12), when SOL advanced another 1% from $239.92 to $241.17.
  • The most dramatic breakout came just after midnight UTC on Sept. 12, when volume surged to 3.66 million contracts — nearly triple the 24-hour average of 1.46 million.
  • Support was established around $225.50 during early consolidation, while resistance emerged at $240.08, where several rallies initially stalled.
  • Heavy trading volume at $228.78 (3.66 million contracts) confirmed that level as a key support zone.
  • The busiest trading window was 14:09–14:11 UTC, with 214,368 contracts changing hands — nearly six times the typical hourly average.
  • A fresh support level has now formed near $241.17, suggesting buyers are willing to defend higher prices even after the breakout.

Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk’s full AI Policy.



Source link

September 12, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Chainlink CEO and co-founder Sergey Nazarov
NFT Gaming

How Stripe’s Tempo and Circle’s Arc Fail the Decentralization Test, Explains Libra Co-Creator

by admin September 7, 2025



Christian Catalini, co-creator of Facebook’s Libra project, warned on Friday that Stripe’s Tempo and Circle’s Arc could succeed commercially but at the cost of crypto’s decentralization ideal.

Launched in 2019, Libra was Meta’s bold bid to create a global digital currency backed by a basket of stable assets. The project promised to make payments as seamless as messaging, but it triggered immediate backlash from regulators concerned about financial sovereignty, systemic risk, and user privacy. By 2022, Libra — renamed Diem in a bid to reset its image — was shuttered and its assets sold off.

Catalini, who served as Libra’s chief economist, used his Sept. 5 thread on X to revisit the project’s early compromises and explain why they matter now. He said the original open design, developed with Harvard economist Scott Kominers, was reduced to a short appendix after months of regulatory negotiations.

The first major retreat, he wrote, was abandoning non-custodial wallets. Regulators insisted on a “clear perimeter,” meaning a responsible intermediary they could contact — and penalize — if problems arose.

For supervisors used to intermediated finance, a world where users truly held their own money was unmanageable. “For them, killing self-custody wasn’t a choice, it was an obvious necessity,” he recalled.

Catalini noted the irony: today, open networks are developing compliance tools native to blockchain that could have addressed these concerns more effectively than traditional frameworks. But back then, Libra was forced to strip away decentralization, a change he described as an early signal of where corporate-led projects were heading.

His broader lesson was stark: “As long as there is a single throat to choke — or a committee of them — you can’t truly rewire the system. Worse, any network with an architect is living on borrowed time.”

Arc and Tempo in the Spotlight

Catalini placed Stripe’s Tempo and Circle’s Arc in that context. Both are new blockchains designed explicitly for payments, promoted as stablecoin-first infrastructure for enterprises and fintechs.

Circle launched Arc on Aug. 12, presenting it as a Layer-1 network purpose-built for stablecoin finance. Unlike public chains that rely on volatile gas tokens, Arc uses USDC for fees, offering predictable, dollar-denominated costs.

It integrates a built-in foreign exchange engine, promises sub-second finality, and includes opt-in privacy features. Circle said Arc will support cross-border payments, onchain credit systems, tokenized capital markets and programmable, automated payments.

Just weeks later, Stripe and Paradigm unveiled Tempo on Sept. 4, describing it as a payments-first blockchain capable of handling over 100,000 transactions per second.

The network is EVM-compatible, features a dedicated payments lane with support for memos and access lists, and allows users to pay both transactions and gas in any stablecoin. Stripe said early design partners include Visa, Deutsche Bank, Revolut, Nubank, Shopify, OpenAI, Anthropic and DoorDash.

Both projects were marketed as steps toward mainstreaming stablecoin payments. But for Catalini, they raised a deeper concern.

A Revolution or a Failed Coup?

Catalini argued that corporate-led chains like Arc and Tempo risk simply rebuilding the old financial system with new players in charge. Instead of displacing card networks and banks, he warned, they could elevate fintech giants to the same position of dominance. “The throne will have new occupants, but it will be the same throne,” he wrote.

He also predicted such networks would fracture geopolitically, with Western and Eastern blocs unlikely to share a single corporate-led infrastructure. The result, he said, would be competing financial empires rather than the borderless system crypto’s early advocates envisioned.

Ultimately, Catalini described Stripe’s Tempo as a “referendum on the ghost of Libra.” If it thrives, he suggested, it may prove Libra failed because of timing, not design — and show that the dream of open, permissionless money has been overtaken by more pragmatic, centralized solutions.



Source link

September 7, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Indian flag (Naveed Ahmed/Unsplash)
Crypto Trends

Stripe CEO Explains Why Stablecoins Are Winning Over Global Businesses

by admin September 7, 2025



Stripe CEO Patrick Collison said stablecoins are gaining adoption because they offer businesses faster, cheaper and more reliable payments than traditional systems.

His remarks came in a Hacker News thread on Sept. 5, 2025, one day after Stripe and Paradigm launched Tempo, a blockchain designed specifically for stablecoin payments.

In his first comment on the Tempo announcement thread, Collison wrote that Stripe had been “disappointed with crypto’s payments utility for much of the past decade.” He said the company’s view shifted as more businesses began using stablecoins for routine financial activity.

Collison pointed to Bridge, the stablecoin infrastructure provider Stripe acquired in October 2024. He said SpaceX uses it to manage money flows in hard-to-reach markets, Latin American fintech DolarApp relies on it for banking services, and an Argentinian bike importer uses Stripe’s dashboard to pay suppliers.

“These businesses are not using crypto because it’s crypto or for speculative benefit,” Collison wrote. “They’re performing real-world financial activity, and they’ve found that crypto (via stablecoins) is easier, faster, better than the status quo.”

When asked whether people will eventually “pay with Tempo,” Collison said the blockchain is intended to function behind the scenes. He compared it to financial messaging systems like SWIFT or ACH, noting that consumers may not interact with Tempo directly but would benefit from its efficiency. He called “decentralized, internet-scale SWIFT” an imperfect but useful analogy.

In the answer to another question (about why businesses find crypto payments appealing), Collison outlined five reasons companies prefer stablecoins: near-instant settlement that reduces trapped liquidity, lower costs than card payments, greater reliability in cross-border transfers, fewer currency conversions and direct on-chain access to U.S. dollars.

He also rejected the idea that adoption is mainly regulatory arbitrage. Collison said stablecoins are now explicitly regulated in the United States under the GENIUS Act and in Europe under MiCA, and argued their appeal lies in solving the frictions of high-volume money movement.

In the Thursday announcement, Tempo was described as a “payments-first” blockchain built from the ground up for stablecoins, combining Stripe’s global payments experience with Paradigm’s crypto research. The companies said they launched the network to provide infrastructure tailored to real-world payment needs as stablecoins move into mainstream use.

Tempo’s design emphasizes predictable low fees, optional privacy and the ability to pay both transactions and gas costs in any stablecoin. It includes a dedicated payments lane with features such as memos and access lists, and is EVM-compatible, running on the Reth client. Stripe and Paradigm said the blockchain is engineered to process more than 100,000 transactions per second with sub-second finality.

The network is aimed at supporting global payouts and payroll, remittances, tokenized deposits that can settle around the clock, embedded financial accounts, microtransactions and what the companies call “agentic payments.”

Stripe and Paradigm also stressed governance. They said Tempo will operate as a neutral platform for stablecoins, secured by an independent and diverse validator set, with a roadmap toward fully permissionless validation.

The project launched with a broad roster of design partners, including Visa, Standard Chartered, Deutsche Bank, Nubank, Revolut, Shopify, OpenAI, Anthropic, Coupang, DoorDash, Lead Bank and Mercury.



Source link

September 7, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
XRP Is Consolidating For 200 Days Already — Analysts Weigh Where Price Is Heading Next
Crypto Trends

XRP Price Cycle Target Remains $20: Analyst Explains

by admin August 28, 2025



Key takeaways:

  • XRP’s macro outlook remains bullish, with technical scenarios projecting a cycle top above $20, according to one analyst.

  • XRP’s symmetrical triangle signals a potential bullish breakout targeting $4.

XRP’s (XRP) price fell 22% to $2.72 from its multi-year high of $3.66 reached on July 18, before recovering to current levels around $3. 

Has the popular altcoin finally topped out, or is there a stronger rally in the cards?

XRP macro outlook still “bullish”

XRP price action reveals a consolidation within a symmetrical triangle on the daily chart, suggesting that the altcoin may be preparing another bullish impulse,  according to analyst XForceGlobal.

XRP price at “$20 remains the primary cycle target,” the pseudonymous analyst said in an X post on Wednesday. 

Related: XRP 30% open interest drop may open buy zone below $2.50

Although the price still faces strong resistance around the $4 psychological level, “this does not alter the overall bullish outlook on the macro,” the analyst said, adding that XRP could now follow two possible scenarios. 

In the first scenario, the recent pullback is similar to the ones seen in past cycles, where the price drops to create new levels of distribution before a major breakout.

In an accompanying video, XForceGlobal said that after an almost 50% pullback from Jan. 16 highs at $3.40, the price recovered to retest the level with the recent run-up to $3.66.

As such, the latest drawdown is another period of distribution, before making “one of the strongest moves to the upside,” the analyst added.

In the second scenario, XRP distribution will continue to complete the flat period between Wave 1 and 2, before making that “massive” Wave 3 to the upside.

“Essentially, we have two scenarios, in my opinion, that have the highest conviction probability, and I think we are very close to a much larger upward move,” XForceGlobal said, adding,

“There are just no signals supporting a larger sell-off to the downside.”XRP/USD chart, possible scenarios. Source: XForceGlobal

The target for XRP price is between $19 and $30 based on both scenarios, as shown in the charts above. 

XRP symmetrical triangle breakout targets $4

Currently, XRP price is trading within a symmetrical triangle on the daily candle chart, data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView shows 

The price needs to produce a daily candlestick close above the upper boundary of the triangle at $3 to confirm a bull breakout. Above that, the next major resistance is the eight-year high at $3.66, which bulls must overcome to continue the upward trajectory. 

The measured target of the triangle is $4, or a 34% increase from current levels. 

XRP/USD daily chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

The symmetrical triangle interpretation “makes sense when you look at the big picture for XRP,” said veteran trader Matthew Dixon in an X post on Tuesday.

An accompanying chart suggested that the consolidation within the triangle was part of a distribution phase between Waves 3 and 4 before a larger Wave 5 move toward $4.

XRP/USD daily chart. Source: Matthew Dixon

As Cointelegraph reported, multiple technical charts point to a potential XRP breakout in the short term with targets between $4.40 and $6.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.



Source link

August 28, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (1,098)
  • Esports (800)
  • Game Reviews (742)
  • Game Updates (906)
  • GameFi Guides (1,058)
  • Gaming Gear (960)
  • NFT Gaming (1,079)
  • Product Reviews (960)

Recent Posts

  • Clair Obscur And Choice-Based Games Don’t Have To Validate You
  • Little Nightmares 3 Review – Recurring Dreams
  • Little Nightmares III Review – A Familiar Dream
  • Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 will receive new update with “a bit of whee and a bit of whoo”, as studio celebrates new sales milestone
  • LEGO’s Final Prime Day Generosity, Star Wars Ahsoka Ghost and Phantom II Spaceship Hits Lowest Price

Recent Posts

  • Clair Obscur And Choice-Based Games Don’t Have To Validate You

    October 8, 2025
  • Little Nightmares 3 Review – Recurring Dreams

    October 8, 2025
  • Little Nightmares III Review – A Familiar Dream

    October 8, 2025
  • Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 will receive new update with “a bit of whee and a bit of whoo”, as studio celebrates new sales milestone

    October 8, 2025
  • LEGO’s Final Prime Day Generosity, Star Wars Ahsoka Ghost and Phantom II Spaceship Hits Lowest Price

    October 8, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • Clair Obscur And Choice-Based Games Don’t Have To Validate You

    October 8, 2025
  • Little Nightmares 3 Review – Recurring Dreams

    October 8, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close