Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

Elon

Sam Altman Seeks Texts From Shivon Zilis, Elon Musk's Employee/Mother of His Child
Product Reviews

Sam Altman Seeks Texts From Shivon Zilis, Elon Musk’s Employee/Mother of His Child

by admin September 12, 2025


Last year, Elon Musk sued his rival Sam Altman’s company, tech superstar OpenAI. In his lawsuit, Musk claimed that the company had violated federal racketeering laws because, having once promised to stay a nonprofit research lab, had since converted itself into a for-profit company. Musk, who initially poured tens of millions of dollars into the startup, claims he was deceived. OpenAI and Altman have since countered that Musk also wanted OpenAI to become a for-profit venture. This week, the legal battle was ratcheted up a notch, as OpenAI sought to bring those close to Musk into the mix.

Business Insider writes that Altman has now asked a judge to order Shivon Zilis and Jared Birchall to turn over key correspondence as part of the legal case.

Zilis, an executive at Musk’s brain-computer interface startup Neuralink, has had four children with Musk via IVF. They first met back in 2016 when Zilis, who formerly worked for OpenAI, joined the company. Birchall, meanwhile, has often been described as the billionaire’s “right-hand man” and his “fixer,” and often seems to be tasked with critical behind-the-scenes affairs (like managing his money), while also dealing with the less savory aspects of managing Musk’s empire (like interfacing with other women that Musk has had children with).

Additionally, Birchall occupies several important executive roles at Musk-related orgs. Specifically, he runs Musk’s family office, Excession, directs the Musk Foundation, and is the CEO of Neuralink. The inclusion of the two Musk allies in the legal case is described thusly:

As part of his defense against Musk’s 2024 racketeering lawsuit, Altman wants a judge in California to order Birchall and Zilis to turn over key texts and emails in 72 hours. If either blows that deadline, they should be required to sit for one additional, preliminary deposition prior to their primary depositions in the case.

The OpenAI CEO’s legal team has noted that communications with Zilis, in particular, should have relevance to the case. BI reports that attorneys have argued, “She was a conduit between Musk and OpenAI’s co-founders on matters central to this case, including discussions about a potential 2017 restructuring that would have given Musk a large equity stake in OpenAI.”

Altman’s targeting of Zilis and Birchall, two people with close personal and professional ties to Musk, could indicate a broader escalation of the legal fight, as both sides seek to gain an advantage. “Birchall and Zilis should not be forced to sit for two depositions each,” Musk’s attorneys have argued. “If their texts and Gmails cannot be produced in time, their depositions should be rescheduled.” Gizmodo reached out to Neuralink, OpenAI, and Tesla for comment.

The lawsuit against OpenAI is the culmination of a long-running feud between the two billionaires. More recently, Musk sued OpenAI again (along with Apple), alleging that the two companies had colluded to exert anticompetitive control over the AI market.

The suit seeks “billions” in damages. “Apple and OpenAI’s exclusive arrangement has made ChatGPT the only generative AI chatbot integrated into the iPhone,” the suit says. “This means that if iPhone users want to use a generative AI chatbot for key tasks on their devices, they have no choice but to use ChatGPT, even if they would prefer to use more innovative and imaginative products like xAI’s Grok.” In the past, OpenAI has characterized the litigation as being “consistent with Mr. Musk’s ongoing pattern of harassment.” Musk also previously tried to buy OpenAI, although Altman turned him down.

Where did the feud between Musk and Altman start? God only knows, but one thing’s for sure: it shows no signs of simmering down. In the before times, Altman and Musk were chums and business partners, but that all imploded, and for the past several years, it’s been increasingly bad. Can it all be traced back to the fact that Musk was once a co-founder and board member of OpenAI but now, having acrimoniously fallen out with Altman, must be forced to watch it soar without him? All we really know for sure is that personal animosity has transmogrified into a nasty legal war that could ultimately hurt both men more than it helps anyone.



Source link

September 12, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Tesla Offers ONE TRILLION DOLLAR Pay Package to Elon Musk (If He Can Stay Focused)
Gaming Gear

Tesla Offers ONE TRILLION DOLLAR Pay Package to Elon Musk (If He Can Stay Focused)

by admin September 5, 2025


Tesla’s board is asking shareholders to sign off on a massive, unprecedented pay package that could turn its CEO, Elon Musk, who is already the world’s richest man, into the first trillionaire.

If the plan is approved, Musk would need to reach several performance benchmarks over the next 10 years to get the full payout.

The board said in a securities filing on Friday that the pay package’s primary goal is to retain “Mr. Musk to lead Tesla through its next phase of transformational growth.” In other words, the board wants Musk’s full attention on Tesla. But Musk, who’s been running the company since 2008, is also juggling four other ventures: SpaceX, xAI, Neuralink, and the Boring Company.

Musk’s ruinous forays into politics have also hurt Tesla’s brand. In 2024, he endorsed Donald Trump for president, poured millions into Trump’s campaign, and led a shakeup of the federal government via the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Musk’s politics triggered backlash that included incidents of arson and vandalism at Tesla stores and charging stations. Meanwhile, Tesla logged two of its worst quarters in years, with global vehicle deliveries down 13%. In Europe, sales are especially dire.

The new pay proposal follows a Delaware judge’s decision to block Musk’s previous $55 billion compensation plan from 2018, siding with shareholders who said the deal was unfairly approved. Tesla has appealed the ruling. And in August, the company offered Musk about $29 billion in stock if he agreed to stick around for two more years.

How the new plan would work

Under the new plan, Musk could be awarded up to 423 million shares, worth about $143 billion at today’s prices and equal to roughly 12% of Tesla’s stock. Musk already owns about 13% of the company. To cash in, he has to stay on as CEO or hold another executive office and hit a series of production and market-cap milestones.

The award is split into 12 tranches. The first unlocks if Tesla’s market cap, currently hovering around $1 trillion, doubles to $2 trillion. The next nine tranches require an extra $500 billion each, and the final two require a trillion-dollar jump each.

For Musk to take home the full payout, Tesla would need to hit a market value of $8.5 trillion within the next decade, about eight times higher than its current assessment. That would make Musk’s stock haul worth more than $1 trillion.

The plan also ties his payout to some ambitious operational goals, including delivering 20 million vehicles, putting a million robotaxis on the road, and rolling out a million Optimus humanoid robots.



Source link

September 5, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Face,detection,and,recognition,of,citizens,people,,ai,collect,and
Gaming Gear

Elon Musk, AI Startups, and The Case of The Allegedly Missing Trade Secrets

by admin September 5, 2025


A second lawsuit filed by an artificial intelligence company alleging a former employee stole trade secrets has been filed in California, just days after Elon Musk’s xAI alleged it had recently experienced corporate espionage.

In this case, Scale AI, a leading AI data-labeling firm, sued competitor Mercor Inc. in federal court Wednesday, accusing the startup and a former employee of misappropriating trade secrets to win new business.

Scale is valued at approximately $29 billion following a massive $15 billion Meta investment.

The allegations

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, targets Eugene Ling, Scale’s former head of engagement management, and his new employer, Mercor.

The case is Scale AI Inc. v. Mercor.io Corporation, 25-cv-07402.

In its court filing, Scale alleges Ling downloaded over 100 confidential documents, including proprietary customer strategy materials and product information, to a personal Google Drive while still employed at the company and after meeting with Mercor’s CEO.

According to the complaint, Ling then contacted one of Scale’s top clients, referred to as “Customer A,” on behalf of Mercor while still at Scale, even arranging calls to pitch Mercor’s services. The lawsuit claims this effort was an attempt to steal business worth “millions of dollars.”

Attempts to reach Ling’s attorney were unsuccessful. But on his social media, Ling posted that he “never used” any of the Scale files and is “still waiting for guidance on how to resolve this.”

“I just wanted to say that there truly was no nefarious intent here,” he wrote. “I’m really sorry to my new team at Mercor for having to deal with this.”

Mercor’s response

Mercor co-founder Surya Midha denied any misuse of Scale’s intellectual property, stating that while several former Scale employees have joined Mercor, the two firms operate under “intentionally different” strategies. He added that Mercor is investigating the matter and had offered to have Ling delete any documents in his possession.

“While Mercor has hired many people who departed Scale, we have no interest in any of Scale’s trade secrets and in fact are intentionally running our business in a different way,” Midha said in a statement.

“Eugene informed us that he had old documents in a personal Google Drive, which we have never accessed and are now investigating,” it reads. “We reached out to Scale six days ago offering to have Eugene destroy the files or reach a different resolution, and we are now awaiting their response.”

Scale, in turn, argues that ordering Ling to destroy the files would eliminate crucial evidence. The company is seeking damages, legal fees, an injunction barring Mercor from using the stolen material, and the return of all misappropriated documents.

Scale’s legal move is another speed bump for a turbulent period for the company, which has recently experienced Meta’s massive investment, the hiring of Scale’s CEO Alexandr Wang by Meta, and a 14% workforce reduction.

Cutthroat competition comes to the courts

The case is a glimpse into the fiercely competitive nature of the AI sector, where intellectual property—particularly data strategy and customer relationships—is the key to market dominance. The situation mirrors another recent trade secret lawsuit, when Elon Musk’s xAI sued a former engineer for allegedly stealing confidential information on his way to a rival.

In that case, Musk’s company is alleging Zhihao “Zack” Li stole confidential files tied to the development of Grok, the company’s chatbot, before departing for rival OpenAI.

The complaint, filed in California state court, accuses Li, who joined xAI last year as an engineer, of copying proprietary materials in July 2025 shortly after agreeing to take a job at OpenAI. Court filings say Li also sold $7 million worth of vested xAI stock ahead of his departure.

According to the lawsuit, Li admitted during an internal meeting on Aug. 14 that he had taken sensitive documents, though xAI alleges he attempted to “cover his tracks” by deleting files. Forensic checks later uncovered additional materials still stored on his devices, the company alleges.

Musk’s startup argues that the stolen information could allow OpenAI to enhance ChatGPT with what it describes as xAI’s “more innovative AI and imaginative features.”

That case is xAI Corp v. Xuechen Li, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 3:25-cv-07292-RFL

What are the broader implications?

For investors and the AI industry in general, the lawsuit highlights two key risks.

Firstly, the theft of highly complex and coveted intellectual property, or even the appearance of it, can rapidly alter competitive positioning in a market where trust and proprietary data are currency. Secondly, it signals that AI startups may increasingly turn to legal avenues to enforce boundaries and protect their turf.

As AI becomes a part of so much of the technology we see and use all the time, the companies that make it are going to become even more fiercely protective of their products and brands. The value of proprietary data and client relationships makes legal protection, and the precedents set through lawsuits like this, the next frontier for companies looking to safeguard their tools and reputations.

“Scale has become the industry leader on the strength of our ideas, innovation, and execution,” Joe Osborne, a spokesperson for Scale, said in a statement. “We won’t allow anyone to take unlawful shortcuts at the expense of our business.”



Source link

September 5, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Dogecoin price slumps despite Elon Musk, DOGE treasury rumor
NFT Gaming

Dogecoin price slumps despite Elon Musk, DOGE treasury rumor

by admin August 30, 2025



Dogecoin slipped more than 2% to $0.21 in the last 24 hours, bucking the coin’s usual pattern of rallying on Elon Musk-related news.

The drop comes as rumors swirl that Musk’s attorney, Alex Spiro, is spearheading a Dogecoin (DOGE) treasury project aimed at raising $200 million from public investors.

According to Fortune, investors are receiving offers for a public vehicle that will invest in Dogecoin coins.

Summary

  • Dogecoin slips 2% to $0.21 despite news of a $200m treasury initiative
  • Elon Musk’s lawyer Alex Spiro is set to chair the planned DOGE treasury
  • House of Doge backs the venture as Dogecoin’s official corporate vehicle

Dogecoin price slumps despite positive rumors

Since its 2013 debut, Dogecoin’s price has often moved in step with Musk’s public comments. However, the market’s muted response to the proposed treasury vehicle—a project reportedly approved by the official Dogecoin organization, the House of Doge—suggests that traders may be prioritizing fundamentals over hype.

Details about the structure and launch timeline remain scarce, even as analysts see potential for a renewed rally.

Spiro’s Track Record Defending Musk in Crypto Cases

Alex has successfully defended Musk against allegations of market manipulation.

In August 2024, Spiro helped secure the dismissal of a 2022 lawsuit claiming Musk had manipulated Dogecoin markets through social media posts.

Spiro, who also represents celebrities such as Jay-Z and Alec Baldwin, successfully argued that Musk’s comments constituted protected speech rather than market manipulation.

Musk’s influence over Dogecoin pricing has been so pronounced that his social media activity has become a key factor in trading strategies.

His 2021 Saturday Night Live appearance, where he called Dogecoin “a hustle,” caused immediate price volatility.

Nevertheless, analyst Ali recently posted on X that “Dogecoin $DOGE is ready for a 30% move.” This suggests that technical momentum may be building despite current price weakness.

This prediction aligns with historical patterns where DOGE often experiences sharp moves following periods of consolidation.

The treasury company’s plans could provide sustained buying pressure for Dogecoin if successfully launched.

At last check Saturday, Dogecoin is down nearly 9% over the previous seven days.

Source: CoinGecko



Source link

August 30, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Elon Musk's DOGE Point Man is Now An MDMA Consigliere
Product Reviews

Elon Musk’s DOGE Point Man is Now An MDMA Consigliere

by admin August 30, 2025


Antonio Gracias, Elon Musk’s close ally and Tesla (TSLA) board member, has pivoted to a controversial takeover of Lykos Therapeutics, a biotech firm developing MDMA-based therapies once rejected by the FDA for safety concerns, The Guardian reports.

As the psychedelics industry inches toward mainstream acceptance, new developments reveal how politics, science, and industry interests are shaping the future of mental health treatments.

But Gracias’ involvement in the regulatory body of the company he is now boosting is raising eyebrows, The Guardian reports.

Lykos, which announced a $50 million recapitalization earlier this year, has been at the front of pioneering some of the most promising research into MDMA-assisted therapy. But the firm’s recent FDA rejection of its clinical trials, which cited flaws linked to bias and trial design, has cast doubt on its prospects for approval.

Thanks largely to debates about scientific rigor, the agency ordered new Phase 3 testing, a process likely to take several years and cost millions.

The company’s opponents argue that flawed science led to the rejection, while supporters believe in the therapeutic potential of MDMA under proper regulation.

Neither Lykos nor Gracias responded to a request for comment.

‘Greasing the wheels’ for regulation?

Gracias’s recent leadership of Lykos, financed with a $50 million infusion backed by wealthy investors including hedge funds and veteran executives, arrives as Republican and Democratic officials alike are warming to the idea of faster approval for psychedelic medicines.

Some top Trump-era health officials, such as former officials and lawmakers, have publicly supported reevaluating the regulatory process, citing promising early results and patient demand.

This is raising alarm bells with ethics experts.

“You can’t be greasing the wheels and then say, ‘OK, now I’m going to quit and go pursue that approval,’” said Cynthia Brown, senior ethics counsel at the non-profit watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, told The Guardian.

This political backing fuels concerns about politicizing the science. Critics warn that relaxing FDA standards or fast-tracking approvals under the influence of industry insiders could undermine the integrity of scientific research, risking future setbacks if safety is compromised.

“The challenge is ensuring that enthusiasm doesn’t outpace the evidence,” As Mason Marks, a Harvard law professor specializing in drug policy, told The Guardian. “Science must remain independent from politics to avoid bringing the entire industry into disrepute.”

Meanwhile, Gracias’s ties to Musk and the military, along with his past work in government, have raised questions about conflicts of interest amid the push for regulatory reform.

So will the FDA now reconsider?

The FDA now has broad discretion to reconsider its previous decisions, potentially issuing emergency authorizations or expedited reviews, creating opportunities for firms like Lykos to accelerate their path to market.

“Maps and Gracias are going to try to seize the moment that we’re in,” Ifetayo Harvey, a former Maps employee and executive director of the People of Color Psychedelic Collective, said. “I think the aim is to get MDMA-assisted psychotherapy approved by the FDA by any means necessary.”

Gracias’ involvement raises quite a few questions for the burgeoning psychedelics industry.

It stands at a crossroads: Whether to forge ahead under politicized but promising conditions or to proceed cautiously to ensure long-term safety and efficacy. As political figures harness deepening public interest in mental health and wellness, industry insiders and regulators face a delicate balance between hope and harm, progress and prudence.

“With the lack of transparency, it leaves us really grasping at what it even means to be Doge,” said Faith Williams, a policy director at the Project on Government Oversight, a non-profit watchdog group, told The Guardian.. “We have seen so many, if not outright conflicts of interest then potential for conflicts of interest, and if not outright corruption, potential for corruption.”

The magic of Burning Man

Rick Doblin, founder and president of the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) and a prominent, longtime advocate for the research and therapeutic use of psychedelic drugs. Doblin said he immediately saw a partnership.

“It was the magic of Burning Man,” Doblin said. “I was sort of looking for a white knight that would come in and would be more focused on healing and on public benefit.”

That spring, Lykos Therapeutics has announced a major leadership shakeup, appointing a new CEO and chief medical officer and restructuring its board of directors. These moves arrived as Gracias and investor Christopher Hohn assumed control.

“Gracias is actively involved in the company’s day-to-day operations,” an unnamed Map director and industry insider, told The Guardian. They said that was emphasizing the influence Gracias now wields over the firm’s strategic direction as it aims to regain regulatory confidence and accelerate clinical trials.

This leadership shift underscores the high stakes and intense industry interest in psychedelics, with supporters and critics alike watching closely as the company navigates complex regulatory and scientific hurdles.

But even more unusually, backers of the the company have been accused of a fundraising effort that allegedly involved doing drugs with investors.

“Definitely part of their fundraising strategy is ‘Meet rich people at Burning Man, do psychedelics with them and get Maps money,’” Harvey, who was Doblin’s executive assistant in 2015, told The Guardian.

Maps addresses allegations of drugs with investors

Maps denied that it used drugs to as a means of drumming up investment.

“MAPS conducts all fundraising activities with the highest integrity and maintains strict ethical boundaries in all donor relationships and fundraising activities. MAPS does not supply controlled substances at any events or gatherings, nor do we use substances as a fundraising tool or strategy,” Maps said in a statement.

Doblin also told Business Insider last year that giving drugs to donors was “not common”.



Source link

August 30, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Elon Musk’s Lawyer To Chair $200M Dogecoin Treasury Plan: Report
Crypto Trends

Elon Musk’s Lawyer to Chair $200M Dogecoin Treasury Plan: Report

by admin August 30, 2025



Elon Musk, the billionaire tech mogul, is once again making headlines through his inner circle. His personal lawyer, Alex Spiro, is listed as chairman of a new Dogecoin digital asset treasury (DAT) aiming to raise at least $200 million, Fortune reported on Friday, citing anonymous sources.

According to the report, investors are already receiving pitches for the Dogecoin treasury company, which plans to invest directly in the token. However, the exact timeline for the launch remains unclear. The House of Doge, the organization tied to the memecoin Dogecoin, has not yet commented on this.

Spiro, known for representing celebrity clients like Jay-Z and Alec Baldwin, is now stepping into crypto leadership. His involvement adds weight to Dogecoin’s growing push into mainstream finance.

DATs, or digital asset treasuries, have become one of the hottest trends in crypto. Several Nasdaq-listed firms have recently transformed into token-accumulating companies, backing assets such as Solana, SUI, Toncoin, and World Liberty Financial’s WLFI governance token.

Dogecoin Market Update

As of writing, Dogecoin was down 2%, trading at $0.2761 with a market cap of $32.81 billion, according to CoinMarketCap. Despite the dip, the memecoin still enjoys huge community support.

The biggest DAT to date is Michael Saylor’s Strategy, holding nearly $70 billion worth of Bitcoin. Inspired by this model, Bit Origin also announced plans in July to build a corporate Dogecoin treasury with $500 million in funding.

Musk, Dogecoin’s most famous supporter, recently said that “fiat is hopeless,” reinforcing his belief in digital assets.

Also Read: Musk Says Fiat Hopeless; His America Party Supports Bitcoin



Source link

August 30, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Decrypt logo
NFT Gaming

Eliza Labs Sues X, Accuses Elon Musk’s Platform of Copying AI and Cutting Them Off

by admin August 29, 2025



In brief

  • Eliza Labs sued X Corp., alleging theft of AI tech and anti-competitive deplatforming.
  • A legal expert said that Eliza Labs’ open-source status weakens IP claims, but unfair practices may hold.
  • Eliza Labs seeks damages, reinstatement, and profits from allegedly misused technology.

Eliza Labs and its founder, Shaw Walters, are suing Elon Musk’s X, claiming the company tricked them into handing over technical details about their AI tools, then banned them from the platform and launched copycat products.

The lawsuit says X unfairly used its monopoly power, damaged Eliza’s reputation, blocked its access to customers and investors, and profited from Eliza’s innovations. Eliza Labs isn’t naming a dollar figure, but is asking the court to make X return its “ill-gotten gains,” pay for Eliza’s losses, and add treble damages and punitive damages on top.

Eliza Labs is the company behind ElizaOS, an open-source framework for building autonomous AI agents that can interact and perform tasks across blockchain networks.



The complaint, filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claimed Eliza was invited in, mined for information, and ultimately pushed aside—with its own framework allegedly repurposed for X’s competing AI product, Grok.

The lawsuit claims that in early 2025, X invited Walters to meet after Eliza’s open-source tools gained traction with developers. The platform lets users build autonomous AI agents and 3D avatars with real-time chat, voice, video, and phone integration.

Soon after, X allegedly demanded a $50,000-per-month enterprise license to continue operating on the platform, before suspending Eliza Labs and Walters’ accounts for violating X’s terms and conditions. Internal messages cited in the complaint show an X executive warning that Eliza Labs had triggered legal action for API circumvention, unverified government customers, and unapproved use cases. Eliza Labs claimed that X then offered to pause that process in exchange for further talks.

While the accounts remained inactive, Walters says X continued requesting technical documentation under the guise of resolving the issue—then launched nearly identical AI agents under its xAI brand.

According to legal expert Kelly Lawton-Abbott, partner at law firm SSM, the lawsuit breaks new ground in the AI space—but faces long odds.

“There aren’t many cases in the AI space on anticompetitive behavior,” Lawton-Abbott told Decrypt. “Because Eliza is an open-source software platform, they don’t have the same protection of their software that they would have if it were proprietary.”

According to Lawton-Abbott, the burden of proof in federal antitrust claims is high. “For antitrust, it’s a pretty high standard,” she said. “I think that’s going to be a hard one for them to succeed on.”

Still, Lawton-Abbott said the lawsuit may be more about leverage than litigation. “I wouldn’t expect this to move forward,” she said. “I think it’s probably going to be leverage for a settlement.”

Lawton-Abbott also acknowledged the underlying power dynamic between the companies.

The suit claims X never responded to Eliza Labs’ request to have its accounts reinstated, and instead launched its own AI agents with similar features. In July, X’s artificial intelligence division, xAI, rolled out “Companions,” a new feature in the Grok chatbot app. The launch included Ani, a gothic anime-style avatar that greets users with “Hey babe!” and Rudy, a hoodie-wearing red panda for more playful interactions.

X Corp. has not publicly responded to the complaint. However, its AI tool, Grok, was sanguine about Eliza prevailing in court.

“This case has intriguing hooks but faces uphill battles, especially against a platform like X with deep pockets and precedent-favoring defenses.” It said. “Overall, this has 40-50% odds of surviving dismissal—fraud/UCL claims are stickier than antitrust, which often fails against tech giants.”

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.



Source link

August 29, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Decrypt logo
GameFi Guides

Google Gemini and Elon Musk’s Grok Are Gaining on ChatGPT

by admin August 29, 2025



In brief

  • ChatGPT still leads, but Google’s Gemini and Musk’s Grok are closing fast, per Andreessen Horowitz’s Top 100 AI Apps.
  • The AI app market is stabilizing—fewer new entrants on web, more originality on mobile.
  • China’s AI giants and “Brink List” newcomers show the next wave of global challengers.

For more than a year, OpenAI’s ChatGPT has been the undisputed heavyweight of consumer generative AI.

But according to the latest “Top 100 Gen AI Consumer Apps” report from venture capital giant Andreessen Horowitz, which analyzes two-and-a-half years of AI usage data, the challengers are finally starting to close the gap. Google’s Gemini and Elon Musk’s Grok are climbing the charts, signaling that rivals are coming for OpenAI’s crown.

That said, the Gen AI ecosystem is showing signs of stabilization. The web list saw 11 newcomers compared to 17 in March 2025, indicating less churn. The mobile app market, however, saw 14 new entries, partly due to app stores cracking down on “ChatGPT copycats,” making room for more original apps.

The report also seems to be somewhat at odds with a June SimilarWeb analysis that showed that OpenAI’s GPT was eating the web, with some 5.5 billion visits a month.

The big takeaways

That could be explained, of course, by how rapidly the AI landscape is shifting. Google has been making significant moves, with four products entering the web list for the first time. Gemini, its general LLM assistant, now ranks second on the web, capturing about 12% of ChatGPT’s web visits.

Other notable Google products include AI Studio (developer-oriented, top 10 web) and NotebookLM (#13 web), which has seen steady growth. On mobile, Gemini is also #2, with strong Android usage (nearly 90% of its MAUs).



While ChatGPT still leads among general LLM assistants, Google, xAI, and Meta are closing the gap.

X’s Grok jumped from no mobile app in late 2024 to 20 million MAUs, ranking #4 on web and #23 on mobile. This surge was fueled by the release of Grok 4—with improved reasoning, real-time search, and tool integration—and the introduction of AI companion avatars. Meta AI, however, has seen more subdued growth, ranking #46 on the web list and missing the mobile cutoff. DeepSeek and Claude have seen mobile usage flatten, while Perplexity continues to grow.

The AI world, of course, includes significantly more users than those who use the dominant platforms in the west. Chinese AI apps are gaining significant traction globally. Three China-serving companies—Quark (#9 web, #47 mobile), Doubao (#12 web, #4 mobile), and Kimi (#17 web)—are in the web top 20, largely due to China being the largest market and restrictions on non-Chinese LLMs.

Additionally, a substantial portion of the web list and 22 of the top 50 mobile apps—especially in photo/video editing, with Meitu contributing five entries—are developed in China and are now “exported” globally. Chinese video models, in particular, show an advantage, potentially due to more research focus and fewer IP regulations.

“Vibe coding” platforms are generating strong user engagement and revenue retention. Lovable and Replit debuted on the main list, while Bolt, previously a newcomer, is now on the “Brink List.” These platforms are also boosting traffic for other AI products and infrastructure providers like Supabase.

The report, now in its fifth edition, continues to anoint “All-Stars.” Fourteen companies have consistently appeared in all five editions of the web top 50, earning them “All-Star” status. These include general assistance (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Poe), companionship (Character AI), image generation (Midjourney, Leonardo), editing (Veed, Cutout), voice generation (Eleven Labs), productivity (Photoroom, Gamma, Quillbot), and model hosting (Civitai, HuggingFace). These All-Stars primarily hail from the U.S., UK, Australia, China, and France.

And finally, to track momentum at the edges, Andreessen Horowitz now publishes a “Brink List”—the five web and five mobile apps closest to breaking in. From the previous cycle, three “almosts” actually made it: Lovable (#22 web), PolyBuzz, and Pixverse. The message is clear: Today’s near-misses can be tomorrow’s breakouts.

The bottom line

ChatGPT still leads—but Gemini and Grok’s rise proves the fight is no longer one-sided. As Andreessen Horowitz’s top 100 shows, the consumer AI ecosystem is growing up, but it hasn’t stopped mutating. The giants may be closing the gap, but the next big breakout could still come from the “brink.”

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.



Source link

August 29, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Grok's Tips On How to Assassinate Elon Musk Are One More Red Flag For Wall Street
Product Reviews

Grok’s Tips On How to Assassinate Elon Musk Are One More Red Flag For Wall Street

by admin August 27, 2025


Wall Street tech watchers that had only recently recovered from Elon Musk’s AI chatbot going rogue are now quietly reassessing the technology, after a new leak of thousands of user conversations show it teaching people how to make drugs, assassinate Musk himself, and build malware and explosives.

Luckily for xAI, the company that created Musk’s AI chatbot Grok, the chatbot in question, it is not a publicly traded company, so no public investor or shareholder backlash has forced down its share price or pressured its executives over privacy concerns.

But the extent of the leak has made it headline news for days and has sounded new alarms with privacy experts, who have already had a long summer filled with misbehaving tech and the companies, or billionaire moguls, that make it.

So what did Grok do now?

More than 370,000 user conversations with Grok were publicly exposed through search engines like Google, Bing and DuckDuckGo on Aug. 21. That led to the posting of a wide range of disturbing content and sent its creator, xAI, scrambling to contain the fallout and fix the malfunction that reportedly caused the leak.

What kind of disturbing content? Well, in one instance, Grok offers up a detailed plan on how to assassinate Musk himself, before walking that back as “against my policies.” In another exchange, the chatbot also helpfully pointed users to instructions on how to make fentanyl at home or build explosives.

Forbes, which broke the story, reports that the leak stemmed from an unintended malfunction in Grok’s “share” function, which allowed private chats to be indexed and accessed without user consent.

Neither Musk nor xAI responded to a request for comment. Its creator has not yet publicly addressed the leak.

So how detailed is detailed?

In this instance, pretty detailed.

“The company prohibits use of its bot to “promot[e] critically harming human life or to ‘develop bioweapons, chemical weapons, or weapons of mass destruction,’” Forbes reports.

“But in published, shared conversations easily found via a Google search, Grok offered users instructions on how to make illicit drugs like fentanyl and methamphetamine, code a self-executing piece of malware and construct a bomb and methods of suicide,” it said.

Wait, what was that about assassinating Elon Musk?

Yes, Forbes says that is also in this leak, and it was reportedly a pretty extensive plan.

“Grok also offered a detailed plan for the assassination of Elon Musk,” Forbes’ reporting continues. “Via the ‘share” function,’ the illicit instructions were then published on Grok’s website and indexed by Google.”

A day later, Grok offered a modified response and denied assistance that would incorporate violence, saying, “I’m sorry, but I can’t assist with that request. Threats of violence or harm are serious and against my policies.”

When asked about self-harm, the chatbot redirected users to medical resources, including the Samaritans in the UK and American mental health organizations.

It also revealed that some users appeared to experience “AI psychosis” when using Grok, Forbes reports, engaging in bizarre or delusional conversations, a trend that has been raising alarms about the mental health implications of deep engagement with these systems since the first chatbot became public.

How could Grok be used in a business setting?

Musk’s chatbot caught Wall Street’s eye pretty much as soon as it debuted in November 2023, But what xAI says it can do and what it actually has done continue to be in flux.

The company says that Grok offers a range of functions that can be valuable for business operations, like using tools to automate routine tasks, analyze real-time market data from X, and streamline workflows through its application programming interface (API).

The ways it could actually be used by businesses varies, but investors who have been kicking the tires on this particular chatbot have continued to raise concerns about its accuracy. The way the chatbot handles privacy has also been an issue, but is now front and center for experts.

“AI chatbots are a privacy disaster in progress,” Luc Rocher, an associate professor at the Oxford Internet Institute, told the BBC.

Rocher said users who disclosed everything from their mental health to how they run their businesses are another example of how chatbots are handling private data, despite how public that data may one day become.

“Once leaked online, these conversations will stay there forever,” they added.

Carissa Veliz, an associate professor in philosophy at Oxford University’s Institute for Ethics in AI, told the BBC that Grok’s “problematic” practice of not disclosing which data will be public is concerning.

“Our technology doesn’t even tell us what it’s doing with our data, and that’s a problem,” she said.

Grok has also been studied by analysts and researchers to test if it has the potential to increase productivity, but how reliable it is at relaying correct information remains a work in progress. Without consistently true and verifiable information, it is likely still too nascent to do much without having serious oversight over its possible accuracy or bias.

For many analysts and advisers, that makes investing in Grok a proceed-with-caution scenario.

“Speculation isn’t bad, but unmanaged speculation is dangerous. Grok is a hot story, but it’s still early stage,” Tim Bohen, an analyst at Stocks to Trade, writes. “The model could stall. The platform could underperform. The hype cycle could peak before fundamentals catch up. Traders need to know the risks.”

Musk previously flamed ChatGPT for a similar leak

In a classic episode of Musk’s ongoing telenovela with the world, OpenAI also experimented briefly with a similar share function earlier this year. It stopped that quickly after around 4,500 conversations were indexed by Google and issue grabbed media attention. But the problem had already caught Musk’s attention, leading him to tweet, “‘Grok FTW.” Unlike OpenAI, Grok’s “Share’”

Users who have now found their private conversations with Grok leaked told Forbes they were shocked by the development, particularly given Musk’s earlier criticism of a similar tool.

“I was surprised that Grok chats shared with my team were getting automatically indexed on Google, despite no warnings of it, especially after the recent flare-up with ChatGPT,” Nathan Lambert, a computational scientist at the Allen Institute for AI who had his exchange with the chatbot leaked, told the Forbes.

No word from Musk or OpenAI’s Sam Altman on who gets FTW this time.



Source link

August 27, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Decrypt logo
Crypto Trends

Elon Musk Sues Apple, OpenAI Over iPhone AI ‘Monopoly’

by admin August 26, 2025



In brief

  • Musk’s X Corp. and xAI claim Apple’s exclusive ChatGPT integration gives OpenAI “billions of user prompts” while completely blocking competitors.
  • The lawsuit accuses Apple of manipulating App Store rankings to favor ChatGPT despite Grok ranking second in “Productivity.”
  • Xai and X Corp. are seeking billions in damages and court orders to end the exclusive arrangement.

Elon Musk’s X Corp. and xAI filed a federal antitrust lawsuit Monday against Apple and OpenAI, claiming the tech giants entered an exclusive arrangement that blocks competitors from iPhone AI integration while cementing lopsided dominance in the chatbot market.

The complaint, filed in the Northern District of Texas, seeks “billions” in damages and court orders to end what the plaintiffs call an anticompetitive conspiracy between “two monopolists joining forces to ensure their continued dominance.”

The lawsuit targets Apple’s June 2024 decision to make ChatGPT the exclusive AI chatbot integrated into iOS. 



ChatGPT controls “at least 80 percent” of the generative AI chatbot market while Grok holds only “a few percent” despite claimed superior capabilities, the filing says.

The arrangement gives ChatGPT “exclusive access to billions of user prompts originating from hundreds of millions of iPhones” while shutting out competitors like xAI’s Grok, the firms allege.

“Apple’s exclusive ChatGPT deal has left rivals like Grok unable to match the data scale, and they continue to fall behind,” Midhun Krishna M, MLOps engineer at Juno AI, told Decrypt.

The integration gives OpenAI control of the “largest real-time feedback loop,” he added, ensuring “accuracy and dominance.”

The exclusive integration means iPhone users can receive Siri responses powered by ChatGPT, use AI for photo analysis, and access writing tools, all exclusively through OpenAI’s technology. 

The lawsuit also accuses Apple of manipulating App Store rankings to favor ChatGPT while suppressing competitors. 

Earlier in August, Musk challenged Apple over App Store rankings, questioning why his apps don’t appear in the “Must Have” section despite high rankings.

Despite Grok ranking second in Apple’s “Productivity” category and X ranking first in “News,” neither appears in the prominent “Must-Have Apps” section where ChatGPT is featured, according to the firms.

They also allege Apple delayed approval for Grok app updates and rejected featuring requests, even when new capabilities were added. 

The complaint quotes former Apple App Store director Phillip Shoemaker acknowledging that rankings are often “arbitrary” and that “Apple has struggled with using the App Store as a weapon against competitors.”

Apple fears “super apps” could make iPhones obsolete, threatening its 65 percent U.S. smartphone market share, the filing reads.

OpenAI plans to raise ChatGPT’s premium fee to $44 by 2029, and share revenue with Apple, according to the complaint, which would then collect what it calls “monopoly rents.”

The complaint lists Sherman Act violations such as restraint of trade, monopolization, attempted monopolization, and conspiracy, together with civil conspiracy, unfair competition, and Texas antitrust violations.

X Corp. and xAI are demanding injunctive relief ending the exclusive arrangement and requiring equal integration opportunities for competitors.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

August 26, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (1,098)
  • Esports (800)
  • Game Reviews (772)
  • Game Updates (906)
  • GameFi Guides (1,058)
  • Gaming Gear (960)
  • NFT Gaming (1,079)
  • Product Reviews (960)

Recent Posts

  • This 5-Star Dell Laptop Bundle (64GB RAM, 2TB SSD) Sees 72% Cut, From Above MacBook Pricing to Practically a Steal
  • Blue Protocol: Star Resonance is finally out in the west and off to a strong start on Steam, but was the MMORPG worth the wait?
  • How to Unblock OpenAI’s Sora 2 If You’re Outside the US and Canada
  • Final Fantasy 7 Remake and Rebirth finally available as physical double pack on PS5
  • The 10 Most Valuable Cards

Recent Posts

  • This 5-Star Dell Laptop Bundle (64GB RAM, 2TB SSD) Sees 72% Cut, From Above MacBook Pricing to Practically a Steal

    October 10, 2025
  • Blue Protocol: Star Resonance is finally out in the west and off to a strong start on Steam, but was the MMORPG worth the wait?

    October 10, 2025
  • How to Unblock OpenAI’s Sora 2 If You’re Outside the US and Canada

    October 10, 2025
  • Final Fantasy 7 Remake and Rebirth finally available as physical double pack on PS5

    October 10, 2025
  • The 10 Most Valuable Cards

    October 10, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • This 5-Star Dell Laptop Bundle (64GB RAM, 2TB SSD) Sees 72% Cut, From Above MacBook Pricing to Practically a Steal

    October 10, 2025
  • Blue Protocol: Star Resonance is finally out in the west and off to a strong start on Steam, but was the MMORPG worth the wait?

    October 10, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close