Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

Decline

Faustus Decline sidearm in Destiny 2
Esports

Faustus Decline god rolls and how to get them in Destiny 2

by admin October 1, 2025


It’s rare for random world drops in Destiny 2 to be meta picks, but there are a few sleeper weapons. Even though there are technically no world drops in the Portal, Faustus Decline is on the same level of appeal: unremarkable but powerful.

Faustus Decline is a Stasis Lightweight Frame sidearm. While simple on paper, Lightweight sidearms have their own niche in the Destiny 2 sandbox, and this one comes with decent perk combinations regardless of what you’re about to play.

Here are the Faustus Decline god rolls in Destiny 2 for PvE and PvP.

What is the Faustus Decline god roll in Destiny 2?

One roll down, one to go. Screenshot by Dot Esports

Faustus Decline PvE god roll

  • Barrel: Corkscrew Rifling
  • Magazine: Appended Mag
  • Perk one: Rimestealer or Demolitionist
  • Perk two: Headstone
  • Masterwork: Handling

Faustus Decline PvP god roll

  • Barrel: Hammer-Forged Rifling
  • Magazine: Ricochet Rounds
  • Perk one: Lone Wolf
  • Perk two: Kill Clip
  • Masterwork: Masterwork

In PvE, the god roll is Rimestealer with Headstone. Rimestealer grants a stack of Frost Armor when defeating a frozen target or shattering a Stasis crystal, and Headstone creates a Stasis crystal when getting a precision final blow, synergizing perfectly with Rimestealer. Frost Armor can be a weak buff unless you’re leaning into it with your subclass, so there’s always Demolitionist to get 10 percent grenade energy per kill.

In PvP, Lightweight Frame sidearms serve as a solid backup if you’re not running a Special weapon. Heliocentric QSc has been one of the top choices, with perk combinations like Heal Clip with Kill Clip, and Faustus Decline serves as an alternative for the Kinetic slot.

On Faustus Decline, there’s Lone Wolf in the third column for increased aim assist and airborne effectiveness. The base buff is five aim assist and 15 airborne effectiveness, doubling when there are no allies nearby.

Much like on Heliocentric QSc, there’s Kill Clip in the fourth column to get a 25 percent increased damage for five seconds when reloading after a kill. You could also go for Sword Logic. It doesn’t require a reload but only provides a 15 percent damage buff in PvP. Sword Logic’s strength is that you can refresh the buff’s time with additional kills, allowing for more chain kills in 6v6 playlists.

For hip-fire enjoyers, there’s also Hip-Fire Grip with Offhand Strike. Both increase the weapon’s performance when firing from the hip, and work well with Exotic armor pieces that focus on hip-fire, like Radiant Dance Machines.

How to get Faustus Decline in Destiny 2

There are quite a few weapons in the pool. Screenshot by Dot Esports

Faustus Decline drops from Solo and Fireteam Ops in the Portal. It’s one of the many weapons, including newer additions like Unfall and Drang, that can drop as a completion reward or a Bonus Drop if you’ve been keeping up with your daily challenges.

The best way to farm Faustus Decline (or any weapon in the Portal) is to wait until it becomes a Bonus Focus reward for any of the activities with the daily reset. Completing that activity with a grade B or higher has a chance of dropping the featured weapon.

Dot Esports is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy



Source link

October 1, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
XLM/USD (TradingView)
Crypto Trends

XLM Consolidates After Sharp Decline, Testing Key Support Levels

by admin September 24, 2025



Stellar’s native token XLM weathered intense volatility over the past 24 hours, plunging to key support levels before staging a robust rebound. The moves, marked by unusually heavy institutional trading activity, underscored the market’s focus on the $0.36–$0.37 support zone as traders weigh the prospects of a breakout toward higher targets.

During the Asian trading session, XLM plummeted to $0.36 on volumes surging above 40 million—more than double the 24-hour average—solidifying this price area as a critical high-volume support. The sell-off was quickly absorbed, with the token climbing back toward $0.37, a sign that institutional players may be accumulating positions at discounted levels.

The final hour of trading on Sept. 24 was especially turbulent. XLM slipped sharply to $0.368 at 13:37 before recovering back to session highs of $0.369 by 14:10. Volume spikes at 13:37 (1.27 million), 13:58 (1.19 million), and 13:59 (1.58 million) highlighted significant institutional flows driving the intraday swings.

XLM/USD (TradingView)

Technical Indicators Signal Consolidation Pattern

  • Price range of $0.01 representing 4 per cent volatility indicates active trading interest.
  • Elevated-volume support test at $0.36 level with 40.69 million in trading volume.
  • Recovery towards $0.37 during Asian trading hours suggests institutional buying.
  • Critical support zone established around $0.36 psychological level.
  • Volume spikes during final hour indicate significant institutional activity.
  • Consolidation pattern formation above $0.37 support zone.

Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk’s full AI Policy.



Source link

September 24, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
HBAR/USD (TradingView)
NFT Gaming

HBAR Experiences Sharp Decline Amid High Volume Selling Pressure

by admin September 22, 2025



HBAR experienced a sharp downturn over a 23-hour trading window between September 21 and 22, as the token tumbled from $0.24 to $0.22. The 6.29% decline was accompanied by a dramatic expansion in volatility, with trading ranges reaching 9.7%—well above monthly averages. Market pressure intensified as institutional sellers drove prices lower, establishing firm resistance around the $0.235–$0.24 zone and triggering a wave of liquidations.

The most pronounced selling pressure arrived at midnight on September 22, when volumes surged to 137.11 million, nearly triple the daily baseline. This spike marked the peak of the selloff as market sentiment soured across crypto assets, amplifying HBAR’s decline. At the trough, the token hovered around $0.22, signaling potential capitulation among short-term holders.

Yet, the session ended with a notable rebound. In the final hour of trading, bulls regained momentum, pushing HBAR from $0.2197 to $0.2222. A breakout above the $0.22 threshold was fueled by an exceptional 6.21 million in volume within minutes, sparking a short-lived rally toward session highs near $0.2225. The recovery underscored the token’s liquidity-driven dynamics, though volumes collapsed to zero in the final three minutes, suggesting a temporary equilibrium.

HBAR’s volatile session highlights the crypto market’s heightened sensitivity to institutional flows and sentiment-driven reversals. The combination of sharp declines, outsized volume spikes, and a late-stage rebound illustrates the rapid shifts in liquidity that define digital asset markets—underscoring how quickly bearish pressure can give way to opportunistic buying.

HBAR/USD (TradingView)

Key Technical Indicators

  • Price tumbles 6% from $0.24 to $0.22 over 23-hour period from 21 September 15:00 to 22 September 14:00.
  • Volume explodes to 137.11 million at 22 September 00:00—nearly triple daily average baseline.
  • Bears establish strong resistance at $0.24 level where price reverses sharply on heavy selling.
  • Bulls mount 1% recovery rally in final 60 minutes from 22 September 13:09 to 14:08.
  • Breakout above $0.22 resistance occurs at 13:54 on exceptional 6.21 million volume surge.
  • Zero trading volume in final three minutes signals temporary market pause after volatile session.

Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk’s full AI Policy.



Source link

September 22, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Christie’s Scales Back on NFTs as Art Market Faces Decline
NFT Gaming

Christie’s Scales Back on NFTs as Art Market Faces Decline

by admin September 9, 2025



UK auction giant Christie’s is reportedly closing its department that handles non-fungible token sales, putting it under a broader department amid a global decline in the art market.

The “strategic decision” will see the 258-year-old British auction house continue to sell digital art such as non-fungible tokens (NFTs), but now within the larger 20th and 21st-century art category, according to a report on Monday from Now Media that cited a statement from a Christie’s spokesperson.

At the same time, Now Media reported the auction giant laid off two employees, including its vice president of digital art, but at least one digital art specialist will be kept on staff.

Christie’s has had a huge presence in the NFT space, selling multiple artworks, including Mike “Beeple” Winkelmann’s Everydays: The First 5000 Days, which closed at auction in March 2021 with a bid of $69.3 million.

Digital artist Laura El sold one of her digital artworks, known as Lonely Island at Christie’s in 2023. Source: Laura El

The auction house had also been a supporter of the Web3 space, launching an NFT auction platform in September 2022 and a crypto-only real estate team in July.

Market conditions could have spurred shift 

Fanny Lakoubay, a digital art adviser, curator and collector, said in an X post on Monday that she suspects Christie’s move could be tied to the “current art market contraction.”

The wider art market has been declining, with global sales down 12% in 2024 to $57 billion, along with combined public and private sales by auction houses dropping by 20% to $23 billion, according to the Art Basel & UBS Art Market Report 2025 released in April.

“Auction houses can’t justify a whole department when it brings in less revenue than the others, even with some recent successful sales,” Lakoubay said.

“It’s definitely not a great public signal, but we should also remember: auction houses only focus on secondary sales of already well-known artists and brands. It’s still too early for that model to really work/scale with digital art,” she added. 

Source: Fanny Lakoubay

Lakoubay said it could be a good time to focus on primary market development and introduce traditional collectors to new digital artists.

Christie’s could be having a “Kodak moment”

Meanwhile, an NFT collector and member of the Doomed decentralized autonomous organization, posting under the handle Benji, argued that Christie’s move to close its digital art department doesn’t reflect a weakness in the demand for digital art, or that “institutions are no longer coming for our jpegs.”

He speculates the business model is likely to blame for the decision because it was “flawed and unsustainable,” and this new direction could be Christie’s “Kodak moment.”

“How can you charge 25-30% commission on something that does not need to be authenticated / stored / insured / shipped, when your online competitors like Gondi charge zero commission for the exact same sale?” Benji said.

“I hate to see good people lose their jobs, but Christie’s exiting the space is a net positive— one less value extractor means more value for collectors and artists alike.”

Source: Benji

Christie’s didn’t immediately respond to Cointelegraph’s request for comment.

NFT market records mixed results

The NFT market has had a turbulent few years. Last year was flagged as the market’s worst year for trading volume and sales since 2020, partly because of volatility and rising token prices.

Related: NFT market cap drops by $1.2B as Ether rally loses steam

It has been showing signs of life in 2025. In August, the sector surged to a market capitalization of more than $9.3 billion, a 40% uptick from July, as Ethereum-based collections and Ether (ETH) increased in price.

The market has shown signs of cooling in recent weeks, but its current market capitalization is up 2% in the last 24 hours and sits at $5.97 billion. 

Several of the largest NFT collections by market capitalization have also experienced gains. CryptoPunks is up 1.9% in the last 24 hours, and has a trading volume of $208,319 with three sales.

Yuga Labs’ Bored Ape Yacht Club is up 3.7% and has clocked a trading volume of more than $1.2 million and 30 sales, while Pudgy Penguins is up 2%, with $905,526 in trading volume and 20 sales. 

Magazine: Astrology could make you a better crypto trader: It has been foretold



Source link

September 9, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Justin Sun and WLFI's Zak Folkman at CoinDesk's Consensus Hong Kong conference. (CoinDesk/Nik De)
GameFi Guides

Holds Above $2.82 After Sharp Decline, Technicals Point to $3.30 Breakout

by admin September 6, 2025



XRP failed to sustain momentum above $2.88–$2.89, triggering a 4% decline as institutional selling capped the advance. Heavy volume confirmed resistance at those levels, while buyers reappeared in the $2.81–$2.83 range to stabilize price action.

The move keeps XRP locked in a 47-day consolidation under $3.00, with traders now eyeing the $2.77 support pivot and October’s SEC ETF decisions as the next catalysts.

News Background

  • Six institutional asset managers have filed spot XRP ETF applications, with SEC decisions expected in October.
  • Whale accumulation continues, with roughly 340 million tokens purchased in recent weeks despite persistent volatility.
  • Exchange balances remain elevated above 3.5 billion XRP, raising questions of potential supply pressure if selling resumes.
  • Federal Reserve policy shifts and inflation prints are shaping broader liquidity conditions across risk assets.
  • Previous attempts to break higher saw 227.7 million tokens trade near $2.88–$2.89, confirming that zone as firm resistance.

Price Action Summary

  • XRP traded within a $0.08 range from $2.81 to $2.89, representing 3% volatility.
  • The sharpest decline came at 14:00 on Sept 5, dropping from $2.88 to $2.81 on nearly 280 million tokens traded.
  • Stabilization followed, with consolidation between $2.82 and $2.83 on lighter volume.
  • Closing price near $2.82 kept XRP just above the $2.77 support pivot, viewed as the next key downside guardrail.

Technical Analysis

  • Support: Strong bid zone identified at $2.77–$2.81 following repeated defenses.
  • Resistance: Immediate ceiling at $2.88–$2.89, with $3.00 psychological level and $3.30 breakout threshold above.
  • Indicators: RSI sits mid-50s, reflecting neutral-to-bullish bias.
  • MACD histogram converges toward bullish crossover, signaling possible momentum shift if volume returns.
  • Structure: Ongoing 47-day consolidation under $3.00, with a close above $3.30 opening potential path to $4.00+.

What Traders Are Watching

  • Whether $2.77 holds as the decisive support level if selling resumes.
  • Price behavior on retests of $2.88–$2.89 resistance, particularly if volume surpasses daily averages.
  • How whale accumulation offsets elevated exchange balances, which suggest latent supply risk.
  • October SEC decisions on spot XRP ETFs, viewed as a key institutional adoption catalyst.
  • Macro drivers from Fed policy and inflation data releases that may influence flows across digital assets.



Source link

September 6, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Trump-linked WLFI’s 40% decline causes millions in losses for crypto whales
NFT Gaming

Trump-linked WLFI’s 40% decline causes millions in losses for crypto whales

by admin September 5, 2025



Whales, or big cryptocurrency investors, have lost millions of dollars by betting on the price appreciation of the Trump family-linked World Liberty Financial (WLFI) token.

Since its launch on Monday, the WLFI token’s price fell by over 40%, despite a large-scale token burn event that permanently reduced the token’s circulating supply, aiming to tighten supply and boost the value of the remaining tokens on the market.

Despite the over 40% decline, some of the pre-sale holders are still showing confidence in the presidentially endorsed token.

Out of more than 85,000 pre-sale participants, 60% were still holding the token, while only 29% had fully sold, wrote blockchain data platform Bubblemaps, in a Wednesday X post.

Source: Bubblemaps

Whales lose millions on Trump-linked WLFI’s 40% dip, despite 47 million burn

Big crypto investors, or whales, were suffering millions in losses on the Trump family-linked World Liberty Financial (WLFI) token, which continued to decline despite a proposal to reduce the circulating supply.

Whale wallet 0x432 lost more than $1.6 million after closing a 3x leveraged WLFI long position, according to Onchain Lens.

“The moral of the story: never be in FOMO,” short for fear of missing out, wrote the platform in a Thursday X post, referencing the whale’s hasty investment move.

The investor had opened a second long position on the WLFI token just 15 hours after closing a previous one with a $915,000 profit, only to lose the $1.6 million.

Confidence in Trump-linked token weakens

Other whales were also exiting WLFI positions at a loss, signaling waning confidence in the Trump-affiliated token’s price outlook.

Source: Onchain Lens

The whale selling came a day after the WLFI platform burned 47 million tokens on Wednesday, permanently removing them in a bid to tighten supply and boost the value of the remaining tokens.

The token burn was not enough to stop its post-launch decline, as the WLFI price fell another 18% in the 24 hours leading up to 8:31 am UTC Thursday, marking a total decline of 41% since it was launched on Monday, according to CoinMarketCap data.

WLFI/USD, all-time chart. Source: CoinMarketCap

Continue reading

Avalanche activity driven by DEXs, trading bots, whale memecoin speculation

Smart contract blockchain Avalanche recorded a consistent surge in blockchain activity, as analysts pointed to growing decentralized trading activities and returning crypto whale speculation on the next emerging memecoin.

Avalanche’s transaction growth surpassed all other blockchains the past week, increasing 66% to 11.9 million transactions across more than 181,000 active addresses, signaling growing investor mindshare focusing on the blockchain.

The milestone occurred after a “landmark effort” by the US Department of Commerce, which adopted Avalanche, along with nine other public decentralized blockchains, to publish its real gross domestic product (GDP), Cointelegraph reported on Aug. 29.

Despite Avalanche’s growing institutional and governmental adoption, we “cannot at this point attribute this to the US Government adopting Avalanche for its GDP data,” said Nicolai Sondergaard, research analyst at the Nansen crypto intelligence platform.

The network’s increasing blockchain activity was mainly driven by decentralized finance (DeFi) traders, miner extractable value (MEV) trading bots and whales speculating on the next big memecoin launch, the analyst told Cointelegraph, adding:

“The transaction surge is driven by: 60% DeFi protocol activity (Trader Joe, Aave, Benqi), 25% Automated trading bots and MEV, and 10% Whale trading and memecoin speculation […].”

The research analyst said that the additional 5% of activity was attributed to blockchain gaming and non-fungible tokens (NFTs).

Avalanche, top five entities by blockchain users, 180 days. Source: Nansen

Continue reading

DeFi lending rises 72% on institutional interest, RWA collateral adoption

Decentralized lending protocols are surging in total value and set to capitalize on the growing institutional adoption of stablecoins and tokenized assets, according to Binance Research.

Decentralized finance (DeFi) lending protocols are automated systems that facilitate lending and borrowing for investors via smart contracts, eliminating the need for financial intermediaries like banks.

DeFi lending protocols have risen more than 72% year-to-date (YTD), from $53 billion at the beginning of 2025 to over $127 billion in cumulative total value locked (TVL) on Wednesday, according to Binance Research.

This explosive growth is attributed to DeFi lending protocols benefiting from accelerated institutional adoption of stablecoins and tokenized real-world assets (RWAs).

“As stablecoin and tokenized asset adoption accelerates, DeFi lending protocols are increasingly positioned to facilitate institutional participation,” wrote Binance Research in a Wednesday report shared exclusively with Cointelegraph.

DeFi lending protocols, TVL, year-to-date chart. Source: Binance Research

A significant portion of this growth was attributed to Maple Finance and Euler, which saw 586% and 1,466% rises, respectively.

“As tokenized assets continue integrating into the mainstream financial system, we expect a new generation of onchain financial products to emerge, enabling more efficient, transparent, and accessible capital markets,” a Binance Research spokesperson told Cointelegraph, adding:

“DeFi lending protocols, in particular, offer a programmable and interoperable framework that makes them well-suited to facilitate greater institutional participation.”

This emerging dynamic is set to enhance DeFi liquidity and the broader crypto ecosystem by “bridging traditional finance and decentralized infrastructure,” added the spokesperson.

Continue reading

Mantle 2.0 to accelerate DeFi-CeFi convergence: Delphi Digital

Mantle 2.0, which aims to become the institutional “liquidity chain” for tokenized real-world assets, is championing a new business model that may accelerate the mutually beneficial convergence between the industry’s centralized and decentralized participants.

Mantle Network was initially launched as an Ethereum layer-2 (L2) scaling solution in 2021 under BitDAO, as the first L2 network launched by a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO).

In July 2023, BitDAO and Mantle Network consolidated into the Mantle brand and the Mantle (MNT) token.

The project is now entering a “new phase in its lifecycle,” dubbed Mantle 2.0. It is marked by Bybit executives being installed as key advisers and a new roadmap targeting the convergence of centralized finance (CeFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi), according to crypto research firm Delphi Digital’s Wednesday report.

Mantle 2.0 may champion a new business model for the cryptocurrency industry, encouraging more DAO-governed projects to merge with major centralized exchanges, combining the advantages of decentralized governance with the deep liquidity and mainstream user base of centralized trading venues.

On Aug. 18, the Bybit exchange launched multiple exclusive campaigns and earn products for the MNT token. 

On Aug. 29, Bybit exchange and Mantle revealed a combined roadmap, which awarded MNT holders lower slippage buys, more payment options within the Bybit ecosystem and other savings and staking products.

Source: Delphi Digital

“Mantle is no longer just an L2 but the foundation of Bybit’s ecosystem. This isn’t a simple partnership but a play for RWA dominance,” wrote Delphi Digital in a Wednesday X post, adding:

“This update shifts the Mantle token into a Bybit utility asset.”

“This anchors MNT’s value to Bybit’s massive daily volume ($3-5B spot, $25B+ derivatives) over simple governance,” wrote the research firm, adding that we are seeing the emergence of a “new competitive landscape that merges TradFi infrastructure with DeFi rails.”

Continue reading

Venus Protocol recovers user’s $13.5 millon stolen in phishing attack

Decentralized finance (DeFi) lending platform Venus Protocol helped a user recover stolen crypto following a phishing attack tied to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. 

On Thursday, Venus Protocol announced that it had helped a user recover $13.5 million in crypto after the phishing incident that occurred on Tuesday. At the time, Venus Protocol paused the platform as a precautionary measure and began investigating. 

According to Venus, the pause halted further fund movement, while audits confirmed Venus’ smart contracts and front end were uncompromised.

An emergency governance vote allowed the forced liquidation of the attacker’s wallet, enabling stolen tokens to be seized and sent to a recovery address. 

Source: Kuan Sun

Continue reading

DeFi market overview

According to data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView, most of the 100 largest cryptocurrencies by market capitalization ended the week in the green.

The meme token MemeCore (M) rose by over 236% as the week’s biggest winner in the top 100, followed by memecoin launchpad Pump.fun’s (PUMP) token, up over 41% during the past week.

Total value locked in DeFi. Source: DefiLlama

Thanks for reading our summary of this week’s most impactful DeFi developments. Join us next Friday for more stories, insights and education regarding this dynamically advancing space.



Source link

September 5, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Pepe Coin tanks below key support, a deeper decline awaits
GameFi Guides

Pepe Coin tanks below key support, a deeper decline awaits

by admin August 31, 2025



The Pepe Coin price crashed below a crucial support level, putting it at risk of a more significant decline as the derivative market indicates a negative funding rate. 

Summary

  • Pepe price has formed a death cross pattern on the daily chart.
  • The weighted funding rate has turned negative.
  • Technical analysis signals a deeper crash is coming.

Pepe Coin price at risk as funding rate flips negative 

Pepe (PEPE), the second-largest Ethereum (ETH) meme coin, was trading at $0.0000100095 on Saturday, Aug. 30, which was 33% below its highest level in June.

CoinGlass data indicates that Pepe may be at risk as liquidations surge, the weighted funding rate turns negative, and open interest declines.

Pepe’s funding rate has been in a downward trend in the past few days and has now turned negative. It moved to a low of minus 0.011%, its lowest level since Aug. 24. 

The funding rate is a figure that examines the fee that traders in the futures market pay to ensure the price remains close to the one in the spot market. A negative funding rate is a sign that these investors expect the future price to be lower than where it is today.

Pepe funding rate | Source: CoinGlass

Pepe’s futures open interest has been in a downtrend. After peaking at over $1 billion in July, it has slumped to $548 million, its lowest level since June. A falling open interest and spot market volume signal that the demand is fading. 

The decline has coincided with the rising liquidations, where exchanges close leveraged trade. Liquidations lead to increased selling pressure, which depresses the price. 

Nansen data shows that smart money and whale investors are no longer buying. Smart money holdings have plunged by 23% in the last 30 days, while whale holdings have been flat. 

Pepe price technical analysis

Pepe Coin price chart | Source: crypto.news

The daily chart indicates that the Pepe token price has remained within a tight range over the past few days. It has crashed below the critical support at $0.0000098, invalidating the forming double-bottom pattern.

Pepe price has also moved below the lower side of the symmetrical triangle pattern. Most importantly, it has formed a death cross pattern as the 50-day and 200-day moving averages crossed each other. 

Therefore, the token is likely to continue falling as sellers target the key support level at $0.0000082, its lowest point since July 22. 



Source link

August 31, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Iran
GameFi Guides

Iran’s Crypto Sector Suffers 11% Decline Following $90-M Exchange Hack

by admin August 28, 2025


Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

According to reports, Iran’s on-chain crypto activity fell sharply in the first half of 2025. Inflows totaled $3.7 billion in the first seven months, a 10% drop from the same period in 2024. The slump accelerated after April: June flows contracted 50% year-on-year and July tumbled 75%.

Major Exchange Breach Shakes Trust

Based on a TRM Labs report, a major security breach hit Nobitex on June 18. Roughly $90 million was taken from hot wallets, source code was leaked, and some stolen coins were steered to vanity addresses that referenced the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

Outflows from the exchange spiked — more than 150% in the week before the fighting — as traders moved funds to what they saw as safer places. Trust, already fragile, was seriously damaged.

Inbound Transactions Collapse As Users Withdraw

Nobitex’s inbound transfers dropped by about 70% year-on-year after the breach. Some dormant Bitcoin wallets tied to mining activity were activated and later routed funds into a newly created hot wallet.

Regulators responded by imposing overnight trading curbs designed to slow panic, but many users had already pulled funds offshore. Reports show a surge in transfers to foreign platforms and payment processors that have lighter identity checks.

Stablecoin Freezes Strain Liquidity

In July, Tether froze 42 wallets linked to Iran, removing a large chunk of usable stablecoin liquidity on local rails. More than half of those wallets had ties, on-chain, to Nobitex or addresses flagged with IRGC links, though ownership remains unclear.

Tether also froze $27 million in USDT tied to Garantex, a sanctioned Russian exchange, an action that highlights the broad reach of compliance moves. The US Treasury blacklisted Garantex in 2022, and that prior action has had echoing effects on market behavior.

Total crypto market cap currently at $3.84 trillion. Chart: TradingView

Power Cuts And Conflict Worsen Market Stress

The decline in flows came during a period of heightened regional tension. A 12-day conflict with Israel erupted in mid-June while nuclear talks stalled. Israeli strikes and internal disruptions led to widespread electricity outages.

Mining rigs were idled. Trading became harder. For many traders, the safest option was to move funds off domestic rails; for others it was to switch stablecoins or chains.

New Taxes Tighten The Grip

In August, Iran approved the Law on Taxation of Speculation and Profiteering. The law brings capital gains taxes to crypto, gold, real estate, and forex.

Enforcement will roll out in stages, but officials say oversight will increase. That policy move, combined with freezes and hacks, gives firms more reason to pause or shift operations.

Featured image from Getty Images, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.



Source link

August 28, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Further Decline on Fed Hawkishness
GameFi Guides

Further Decline on Fed Hawkishness

by admin August 21, 2025



Markets are quickly recalibrating previously lofty odds of an imminent rate cut as the jets touch down in Jackson Hole for the Kansas City Fed’s Economic Symposium.

The current data does not make the case for a September ease, said Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack, speaking with Yahoo News in Wyoming.

“We have inflation that’s too high and has been trending upwards over the past year,” she said. “If the meeting was tomorrow, I would not see a case for reducing interest rates.”

She further argued that inflation numbers are only beginning to show the impact of tariffs and that the full effect wouldn’t be seen until next year.

Hammack’s comments are notable, showing Fed Chair Jerome Powell continues to have plenty of support in his hawkish stance despite two dissident dovish votes at the last central bank policy meeting and President Trump’s continuing campaign for lower rates.

Her remarks also come after a series of potential Powell replacements appeared on the airwaves in recent days to argue for sharply lower interest rates. The latest this morning was former St. Louis Fed boss Jim Bullard, who argued for policy rates 100 basis points below the current level.

Just one week ago, bitcoin touched a record high above $124,000 alongside a nearly 100% expectation that the Fed would trim rates next month. Seven days later, those odds have slipped back to 71%, according to CME FedWatch and bitcoin BTC$112,413.52 has plunged nearly 10% to the current $112,800.

Markets will get to hear from Powell himself at his keynote address on Friday morning and at this point it’s nearly certain he’ll not turn dove. Instead, he’s likely to emphasize that inflation continues to remain too hot and thus the need to take a wait and see approach towards adjusting monetary policy.



Source link

August 21, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Predicting NFL teams most likely to decline in 2025 season
Esports

Predicting NFL teams most likely to decline in 2025 season

by admin August 20, 2025


  • Bill BarnwellAug 19, 2025, 06:15 AM ET

    Close

      Bill Barnwell is a senior NFL writer for ESPN.com. He analyzes football on and off the field like no one else on the planet, writing about in-season X’s and O’s, offseason transactions and so much more.

      He is the host of the Bill Barnwell Show podcast, with episodes released weekly. Barnwell joined ESPN in 2011 as a staff writer at Grantland.

I’ve been looking forward to this column for months. On Monday, I published my annual look at the five teams most likely to improve in the upcoming NFL season. In the years I’ve been writing that column, those teams have improved 31 of 38 times, or more than 81% of the time.

Each year, I also break down the teams that are most likely to decline. This column has had a virtually identical success rate; after last year, it’s 30 for 38. It went 3-2 last year, correctly pegging the Ravens (who dropped from 13-4 to 12-5), Giants (6-11 to 3-14) and Browns (11-6 to 3-14) as teams that would lose more games.

The two that defied my predictions will stick in my mind for a while. The Steelers defied the odds again, maintaining their 10-7 record. They’re responsible for two of those eight times in which a team didn’t decline, and the Steelers came within one win of doing it a third time in 2022. Spoiler: They’re not on my list below.

The other team did a little more than maintain its record from the previous season. The Eagles did not decline from their 11-6 mark in 2023. They went 14-3, then followed that by blitzing through the NFC playoffs and blowing out the Chiefs in Super Bowl LX. When I ranked the top 25 teams of the past 25 years earlier this offseason, I put the 2024 Eagles at No. 4. After their early-season bye, they were comfortably the league’s best team.

So, what did I miss? A massive improvement in their underlying level of play, driven by better players and coaching. This column uses 2024 data and underlying metrics to estimate each team’s true level of performance. Though every team makes offseason changes, history tells us the information from the previous season helps predict what will happen in the year to come.

Subscribe: ‘The Bill Barnwell Show’
More: Predicting teams that will win more games

The Eagles’ changes turned out to be more impactful than almost any in recent memory. It’s rare for a team to land a player in free agency who becomes a first-team All-Pro. General manager Howie Roseman signed two — running back Saquon Barkley and linebacker Zack Baun. After cornerback was a major problem in 2023, Roseman used his first two picks in the draft on Quinyon Mitchell and Cooper DeJean. I wrote last year that rookie cornerbacks often struggle in their debut seasons, which is true, but often doesn’t mean always. Mitchell and DeJean were stars, with the Eagles morphing from one of the league’s worst defenses by EPA per play during their 2-2 start to the league’s best once DeJean entered the lineup in the slot.

Editor’s Picks

2 Related

The Eagles also made strong upgrades at coordinator, as Vic Fangio and Kellen Moore were excellent. Throw in some of the league’s second-healthiest season by adjusted games lost, a 7-2 record in one-score games and the fifth-easiest schedule, and it was a special campaign.

Should I have seen that coming? Maybe. Barkley was going from what might have been the league’s worst situation for running backs to arguably its best, although the concern for him has usually been health, not ability. He was a revelation last season. Fangio and Moore had essentially been fired from their prior jobs, but Fangio was excellent with the Bears and 49ers, and the Eagles were a disaster with Matt Patricia as defensive coordinator by the end of 2023. I thought they could be better on defense but didn’t expect them to be the league’s best for most of the season. They had one of the league’s easiest projected schedules, which I shouldn’t have discounted. If you saw Baun turning into the league’s most productive linebacker, well, I suspect there are quite a few NFL teams that would like to hire you.

Of course, the Eagles were also in the decline column in 2023, when they dropped from 14-3 to 11-6 and then got blown out in the postseason. (Guess which season I heard more about on social media.) The same data that was unreliable and got Philadelphia utterly wrong in 2024 raised concerns about its health and defense and suggested it would have “10 to 12 wins” in 2023.

Being right in 2023 doesn’t make me any less wrong about 2024, but it reinforces how difficult it is to project the season ahead. The Browns and Eagles had the same record in 2023. Data is often helpful in trying to make predictions, but it’s no match for a team adding four Pro Bowl-plus players and dramatically improving its play. All I can do is tip my cap.

Jump to a team:
Chiefs | Colts
Commanders | Lions | Vikings

Record in 2024: 15-2
Point differential in 2024: plus-59
2024 record in games decided by seven or fewer points: 10-0
Projected strength of schedule, via ESPN’s FPI: Sixth toughest in NFL

Two years after the Vikings became the first team in league history to go 9-0 in games decided by seven points or fewer, the Chiefs took things a step further. Andy Reid’s team was an unprecedented 10-0 in one-score games last season. And as always, while there are situations in which a late score can make a game look closer than it actually was, the Chiefs really were getting opponents to slip on banana peels and knock themselves out at the most opportune times. Let’s relive just how narrow so many of Kansas City’s victories were:

  • In the season opener, a Lamar Jackson touchdown pass to Isaiah Likely as time expired seemed to extend the game. As the Ravens were about to line up for a two-pointer, a review found that Likely was out of bounds by half of a toenail, ending the contest.

  • The following week, the Chiefs faced a fourth-and-16 with 48 seconds left against the Bengals, only to be bailed out by a 29-yard pass interference penalty on rookie safety Daijahn Anthony. (Before the conspiracy theorists weigh in, keep in mind that a 21-yard conversion on the prior fourth-and-6 was wiped off by an illegal hands to the face penalty on Chiefs tackle Wanya Morris.) The penalty set up a game-winning field goal from 51 yards out by Harrison Butker.

  • In Week 3, defending a five-point lead in the fourth quarter, the Chiefs came up with two red zone stops on consecutive drives to stop the Falcons, including a controversial no-call on what looked to be pass interference against Kyle Pitts.

  • Six weeks later, a Baker Mayfield two-minute drill produced a touchdown pass with 30 seconds to go. Unlike the Ravens in Week 1, Tampa Bay coach Todd Bowles elected to kick an extra point and send the game to overtime, where the Chiefs won the coin toss and marched downfield for a touchdown.

  • The following week, the Broncos were in position to seal a statement victory over their divisional rivals, but Leo Chenal blocked a 35-yard field goal attempt that would have won the game for Denver, handing the Chiefs a 16-14 win.

  • In Week 12, the Panthers drove downfield for a game-tying touchdown and two-pointer, aided by a pair of pass interference penalties on Kansas City. With 1:46 to go, a Patrick Mahomes 33-yard scramble got the Chiefs into range for a short field goal to win at the buzzer.

  • In Week 13, the Chiefs somehow survived a pair of Raiders drives to hold onto a two-point lead in the fourth quarter. Daniel Carlson missed a 58-yard field goal that would have given Las Vegas the lead with 2:21 to go, and after a Kansas City three-and-out took just 14 seconds off the clock, the Raiders drove into position for another field goal, only to lose the ball on an aborted shotgun snap with 14 seconds left.

  • In Week 14, after a Cameron Dicker field goal gave the Chargers a two-point lead with 4:39 to go, Mahomes & Co. converted three consecutive third downs to drive downfield and eat up the clock. Then, a Matthew Wright field goal bounced off the uprights and in, clinching a ninth consecutive division title.

A pair of seven-point victories over the Chargers and Raiders weren’t quite as close. Maybe it’s unfair to include the Panthers game when Carolina never had the ball with a chance to tie the game or take the lead. There’s no guarantee the Buccaneers or Ravens would have converted their two-pointers, or that the Raiders or Broncos would have hit their field goals to win their respective games. Maybe it’s not fair to treat these games as some collective combination of Chiefs magic and spectacular luck.

And yet, at the same time, you really have to blindly believe to treat this as proof of a dominant team turning on the gas when it most needed it. Was it Mahomes and the offense coming up with key plays at the exact right time? Some weeks, yes. Against the Ravens, Falcons, Bucs, Panthers and Raiders, though, the Chiefs had a chance to chew up the clock and seal victories with first downs but couldn’t sustain their drives, handing the ball back to the opposing team. Most of those drives were three-and-outs.

play

1:42

Why Stephen A. says the Chiefs’ road back to the SB is hard

Stephen A. Smith discusses the improved AFC teams and why the Chiefs have a harder route to return to the Super Bowl than the Eagles.

Was it Steve Spagnuolo’s opportunistic defense closing the door with a well-timed blitz or big play, as Kansas City did against the Bills in the AFC title game? Again, only sometimes. The Chiefs blew late leads on defense against the Bucs and Panthers and came within an inch of doing so against the Ravens. The Falcons drove twice into the red zone and were let down by a missed call in the end zone that would have given them first-and-goal on the 1-yard line. The Broncos converted three third downs to get into field goal range before the Chenal block. Las Vegas quarterback Aidan O’Connell converted five straight passes to get into field goal range before the bungled exchange. That isn’t the résumé of a great defense shutting down teams when the game’s on the line, even if the results ended up looking good for Kansas City.

Do the Chiefs have a psychic hold late in games on the rest of the league? Depends on when you look. They went 8-0 in one-score games in 2021 and 10-0 in those same contests last season. In Mahomes’ other seasons as the starter, they went 25-17 in those one-score contests with him on the field, including a 3-4 mark in 2023. That total — 43-17 — is a spectacular record in one-score games, but even treating Mahomes as an outlier relative to the rest of the league (and I’m willing to believe that possibility), 10-0 is impossibly unsustainable.

The Chiefs had the point differential of a 10.2-win team, owing in part to a 38-0 loss to the Broncos in Week 18 when Mahomes and virtually every other star took most (or all) of the game off. Remove that game and the Chiefs went 15-1 with a 10.7-win point differential. Every other 14-plus win team since 1989 had a point differential of 100 points or more, with their average point differential coming in at 190 points per 17 games. Kansas City had a point differential of plus-59.

The 2024 Chiefs finished the season with the largest gap between their actual record and Pythagorean expected record of any team since 1989, coming in just ahead of the 2022 Vikings. The 30 teams with the largest gap between those two figures over that time span declined by an average of 3.2 wins per 17 games. They went from outperforming their Pythagorean expectation by 3.2 wins to just 0.1 wins per team the following season. In other words, for the vast majority of these teams, they weren’t able to defy what history tells us about point differential for more than one season.

Could the Chiefs be the exception? Of course. Mahomes is the best quarterback of his generation. There’s significant talent on both sides of the ball, and the brain trust of Reid and Spagnuolo are back. The Chiefs spent all of last season dealing with a turnstile at left tackle, a problem they believe they’ve solved after signing Jaylon Moore and drafting Josh Simmons in Round 1. They didn’t have wideout Rashee Rice for most of the season after a knee injury in September, and Isiah Pacheco’s fractured fibula neutered the run game. They converted just under 54% of their red zone trips into touchdowns, the worst rate they have posted in a single season during the Mahomes era. As we saw with the Eagles last season, one way to defy what the numbers suggest is to massively improve your underlying level of play.

Even if the Chiefs improve on a play-by-play basis, there’s a huge gap between the team they were a year ago and what their record suggested. The left side of their line is a huge question mark between tackle and guard, where Kingsley Suamataia might settle after flaming out at tackle. They lost an underrated veteran in safety Justin Reid, who was one of the league’s best tacklers during his time in Kansas City. Rice is likely to miss time with a potential suspension, and tight end Travis Kelce took a major step backward in his age-35 season. Opposing kickers hit a league-low 81.8% of their kicks against Kansas City in 2024, including misses and blocks at the most inopportune times. Can the Chiefs really count on that again?

Of course, all of this isn’t to suggest the Chiefs will be anything short of a Super Bowl contender. They were on this very list before the 2021 season, when they fell from 14-2 to 12-5. That team came within a few yards of making it back to the Super Bowl. Twelve wins and another deep playoff run seem like a reasonable expectation for this team, too.

Record in 2024: 14-3
Point differential in 2024: plus-100
2024 record in games decided by seven or fewer points: 8-1
Projected strength of schedule, via ESPN’s FPI: Fourth toughest in NFL

After mentioning the 2022 Vikings in the Chiefs’ conversation, perhaps it’s only fitting that Minnesota returns as the next team on this list. The 2022 Vikings were one of the more obvious candidates I’ve ever seen for decline, as they went 13-4 while being outscored by three points. That team finished 28th in DVOA, suggesting they were, on a snap-by-snap basis, one of the league’s worst teams. They were immediately bounced from the playoffs at home by a Giants team that ranked 23rd by the same metric.

The 2024 Vikings were different. For one, they were much better. They went 14-3 with the league’s seventh-best DVOA. They played the ninth-toughest schedule. The 2022 Vikings were passengers on defense, with coordinator Ed Donatell fielding one of the most confusingly passive units in recent memory. The 2024 Vikings were the league’s most entertaining and perhaps its most aggressive defense, throwing everything from Cover-0 blitzes to drop-eight coverages from the same pre-snap looks and confounding opposing quarterbacks in the process.

Pigskin Pick ‘Em

FREE to play. Create up to 5 entries and compete for 57 prizes worth $100K. Make Your Picks

The Vikings went 8-1 in one-score games last season. If they had done that after the 2022 season, Kevin O’Connell would be lauded as the game management wizard of his generation. Instead, they went 4-8 in one-score games between those two seasons, and while things might have been different if Kirk Cousins had stayed healthy, four of those losses came in the first five weeks, when Cousins was on the field. O’Connell is still an excellent coach, but he’s probably not going to win 88% of his close games again.

Let’s talk about that defense. Can the Vikings keep their level of play up? While acknowledging they have a great front seven and an excellent coordinator, I’d be a little nervous. They led the league in turnovers (33) and were second in turnover rate (16.6% of opposing drives), trailing only the Bills. Defense is more difficult to sustain than offense, and successful defenses built around high turnover margins are even tougher to maintain from year to year. The Bills were able to do that between 2023 and 2024, but the other teams directly below them in turnover rate two years ago were the 49ers, Bears, Cowboys, Ravens and Saints, none of whom were able to sustain their takeaway rate in 2024. Their defenses all took a meaningful step backward.

That’s not a one-year trend, either. Looking at 2000 to 2023 and the teams that ranked in the top five in turnovers per drive — as the Vikings did a year ago — just 17% of those teams finished in the top five again the following season. Their average rank in turnover rate was 15th. Minnesota could certainly field an excellent defense again, but it probably won’t lead the league in turnovers.

Are there reasons to think the Vikings will simply field better defensive talent? I’m not sure. They were the league’s fifth-healthiest defense a year ago by adjusted games lost, per the new FTN Football Almanac, and they fielded the league’s oldest defense on a snap-weighted age basis. In fact, with the league’s fifth-oldest offense, they were the league’s oldest team on a play-by-play basis. That isn’t inherently disqualifying, but it’s a reality of where they were with their roster construction.

The Vikings were able to get very good play from three veteran cornerbacks in Byron Murphy, Stephon Gilmore and Shaq Griffin. Gilmore and Griffin are gone, so they will be younger at the position, but the players replacing the three veterans haven’t been great elsewhere. Isaiah Rodgers was buried on the depth chart in Philadelphia, while Jeff Okudah and Tavierre Thomas have bounced around the league with limited results. Minnesota is better-equipped to handle the departure of starting safety Cam Bynum, who left as part of the various free agent exchanges the Colts and Vikings made this offseason, but it’s fair to say the expectations for the secondary have to be below what Vikings fans saw last season.

They’ll try to make up for it on the front end, where they … got older by importing two new defensive tackles on the wrong side of 30. Jonathan Allen and Javon Hargrave were both stars earlier in their career, but they combined to play just 11 games last season because of injuries. Allen and Hargrave are big swings, and general manager Kwesi Adofo-Mensah has generally done excellent work in free agency, so there are reasons to be optimistic the Vikings’ front will be even more devastating than it was in 2024.

Adofo-Mensah upgraded the interior of the offensive line, too, bringing in Ryan Kelly and Will Fries from Indianapolis before using his first-round pick on guard Donovan Jackson. The interior line has been a weakness seemingly since the Steve Hutchinson days, so I can’t take any issue with the idea of upgrading those spots. In practice, they should be better than the Ed Ingrams and Garrett Bradburys of the world, but Fries is coming off a broken leg, while Kelly is 32 and hasn’t been the same player he was during his peak seasons. The Vikings also get back left tackle Christian Darrisaw after he suffered a season-ending torn ACL and MCL in midseason last year.

play

1:10

Why Damien Woody trusts Kevin O’Connell

Damien Woody explains why he expects Kevin O’Connell to get the best out of J.J. McCarthy with the Vikings.

The most notable player returning from injury is quarterback J.J. McCarthy. He’ll take over for Sam Darnold, who ranked 14th in Total QBR last season. While Darnold averaged nearly 8.0 yards per attempt in a resurgent performance, he threw 12 interceptions, fumbled eight times and took sacks on more than 8% of his dropbacks. The Vikings were tied for the fourth-most drives in the league, which inflated some of his cumulative stats, both good and bad.

One way for the Vikings and McCarthy to overcome any sort of turnover-induced dip on defense would be to simply protect the ball more reliably. They ranked 18th in turnover rate on a drive-by-drive basis, and they scored just two touchdowns across the 45 drives in which Darnold took at least one sack. They seem set to move toward more of a rotation at running back after Aaron Jones fumbled five times last season. If McCarthy protects the football and takes drive-destroying sacks less often, Minnesota could improve by avoiding negative plays more often.

The Vikings are a pretty unique team. The age of their roster and the moves they have made suggest they’re trying to win right now, but they have what essentially amounts to a rookie quarterback leading the way. And while we normally associate debuting quarterbacks with subpar teams and young rosters, McCarthy is taking over a 14-win team, something I’m not sure has ever happened in the modern era. I’m not expecting a dropoff below .500 like the one we saw in 2023, but a record more in line with their 11.1-win point differential from 2024 would make sense.

Record in 2024: 12-5
Point differential in 2024: plus-94
2024 record in games decided by seven or fewer points: 8-2
Projected strength of schedule, via ESPN’s FPI: Seventh toughest in NFL

The Commanders join the Chiefs as teams that succeeded after being on last year’s most likely to improve list but are tabbed most likely to decline this season. Washington made one of the biggest single-season leaps in recent league history, improving from four wins in 2023 to 12 last season. Then, the Commanders beat the Bucs and Lions in the playoffs before running out of steam in the NFC title game against the Eagles.

Though I was optimistic about the Commanders last season, I thought they would win around eight games and didn’t expect them to make a deep playoff run. Last season, they fixed their biggest problem from the previous season, creating turnovers. The Commanders jumped from a minus-14 turnover margin in 2023 to plus-one last season, though that mostly occurred by dramatically cutting their turnovers on offense.

I hesitated comparing last year’s Commanders with the 2023 Texans, but that turned out to be a great comp in many ways. The Texans accelerated their rebuild by surrounding a talented young quarterback who cut down on the team’s giveaways with a defensive-minded coach and one of the league’s older rosters. In 2024, though they still won the AFC South, they stagnated a bit; the offseason improvements didn’t click, there weren’t many young players (other than Will Anderson Jr. and the secondary) who became impact contributors, and they relied too much on their young quarterback to bail them out. Houston was still good, but it didn’t take the next step many expected.

Read more on the NFL’s greatest

• Best all-time draft picks at every slot
• Introducing the ‘Bag’ Hall of Fame
• Our 53-man All Quarter Century team

We might see the same productions from the Commanders, who fielded the league’s seventh-oldest team last season on a snap-weighted age basis, despite quarterback Jayden Daniels and cornerback Mike Sainristil being wildly impressive in their debut seasons. Getting little out of the draft picks from the Ron Rivera era, general manager Adam Peters covered up holes throughout the roster by adding a bevy of veteran free agents, similar to what Nick Caserio did in Houston. There’s nothing wrong with that philosophy. Peters should be lauded for hitting on edge rusher Dante Fowler Jr., safety Jeremy Chinn, linebacker Frankie Luvu and center Tyler Biadasz, but some of those free agents are gone, and linebacker Bobby Wagner, 35, and tight end Zach Ertz, 34, are in their mid-30s.

Peters has also made aggressive trades to add veterans, and though there’s understandable logic behind those moves, they came at a cost to the Commanders. The deal for cornerback Marshon Lattimore didn’t deliver much last season. Offensive tackle Laremy Tunsil was brought in from the Texans, and Peters made a move with his former team to acquire wideout Deebo Samuel from the 49ers. Washington had just three top-200 picks in April’s draft as a result, and it will again field one of the league’s oldest teams. That means there aren’t a ton of young players on this roster who might improve in 2025.

The Commanders need those players because they might not have the same fortune they had in 2024. They were the league’s fifth-healthiest team by adjusted games lost, ranking among the six healthiest offenses and defenses. That doesn’t include Sam Cosmi, who was Washington’s best lineman for most of 2024 before he suffered a torn ACL in the postseason. It’s unclear whether he’ll be healthy enough to start the season on the active roster.

The Commanders went 8-2 in one-score games and enjoyed more incredible moments than some teams have in a decade. That record doesn’t even include the 86-yard touchdown pass Daniels threw to Terry McLaurin with 21 seconds left against the Cowboys in a game the Commanders eventually lost by eight points. (I don’t treat eight-point margins as one-score games because teams can’t win the game on a single drive and to allow for comparisons between now and the pre-2-point conversion era. If you prefer to consider eight points as a one-score game, the Commanders went 8-4 in those contests.)

Washington’s wildest victory, of course, was decided on the Hail Mary that snatched victory away from the Bears, seemingly sending Chicago into a tailspin. That was the most dramatic of the Commanders’ narrow wins, but it wasn’t the only unlikely or impossibly close triumph:

  • In Week 2, with the score tied at 18, Malik Nabers dropped a fourth-down pass that would have given the Giants a first down with 2:04 to go. The Commanders would have had the two-minute warning and all of their timeouts to stop the Giants, but New York would have been in position to kick a field goal to take the lead, if not score a touchdown. Instead, Daniels hit Noah Brown for a 34-yard gain two plays later, and Washington kicked a game-winning field goal.

  • In Week 15, Spencer Rattler threw a touchdown pass to Foster Moreau with no time remaining, bringing the Saints within one point. Interim coach Darren Rizzi (correctly) went for two and the win, but Rattler’s pass was broken up for a Commanders victory.

  • The following week, after Daniels’ interception late in the fourth quarter of a three-point game, the Eagles were in position to close out the game. Facing a third-and-5 with 2:07 to go, a wide-open DeVonta Smith dropped a pass that would have allowed the Eagles to run the clock down within 30 seconds and drain the Commanders of their timeouts. Instead, Philadelphia kicked a field goal to go up five, and Daniels marched Washington downfield with one timeout for a game-winning touchdown.

  • In Week 17, the Commanders allowed a late touchdown drive to Michael Penix Jr. to tie the score. After a three-and-out, the Falcons drove back into field goal range for the potential winning kick, but backup kicker Riley Patterson missed a 56-yard attempt as time expired. The Commanders won the coin toss and scored a touchdown on the only drive of overtime.

  • And finally, in Week 18, Marcus Mariota ran for 33 yards on a fourth-and-1 with 33 seconds to go to extend the game against Dallas before hitting McLaurin for a touchdown pass with six seconds left, earning Washington a 23-19 victory.

Is Daniels devastating when defenses give him an opportunity to win the game in the fourth quarter or overtime? Absolutely. Was he lucky to get so many opportunities after drops by the other team and missed field goal attempts at inopportune times? Of course. And when teams scored late and made their 2-point conversions to take the lead — as the Bears did with 27 seconds left in Washington — there was even more magic waiting from the rookie sensation. It’s tough to see Daniels getting that many opportunities again, even if he’s up to the task of succeeding when he does.

play

1:11

What is holding up Terry McLaurin’s contract talks with the Commanders?

Adam Schefter discusses if the Commanders can reach an agreement on Terry McLaurin’s contract.

There’s one more thing that is incredibly important to the 2024 Commanders and is unlikely to recur: what they did on fourth down. Coach Dan Quinn and offensive coordinator Kliff Kingsbury should be lauded for leaning into the strength of their team and staying aggressive on fourth down, but the results were almost unprecedented. When they needed a fourth-down conversion, Daniels came through more often than anybody could expect.

During the regular season, the Commanders went 20-of-23 on fourth downs, good for an 87% conversion clip. That was 14 percentage points better than any other team last season. ESPN has fourth-down data going back to 2000, and no team has gone for it on fourth down more than 10 times in a season and converted more often than Washington did in 2024.

The Commanders scored 115 points on drives after converting at least one fourth down, the most by any team over that span. Given how conservative teams were on fourth down before attitudes changed about analytics over the past decade, I would strongly suspect no team has scored more points from its fourth-down approach in NFL history than the 2024 Commanders.

Daniels & Co. will give opposing defenses pause on fourth downs, but asking them to convert at historically high rates is too much. That was a special season, and assuming Daniels stays healthy, the Commanders should be in the mix for a playoff berth again. But it will be something closer to a consolidation year than the next step toward greatness in the DMV.

Record in 2024: 8-9
Point differential in 2024: minus-50
2024 record in games decided by seven or fewer points: 7-4
Projected strength of schedule, via ESPN’s FPI: 13th easiest in NFL

Admit it: If you aren’t a fan of the franchise, did you know the Colts won eight games last season? With conversations about them dominated by the Anthony Richardson discussion, it feels like they were one of the league’s worst teams. In reality, they weren’t great, but they were within one game of a winning record. They had the point differential of a 7.3-win team, which means they outperformed their underlying performance by just under one victory; that’s not usually a team I would target here.

And yet, if you look at those eight wins more closely, it’s hard to feel like the Colts were on the same level with, say, the Cardinals or Falcons. The Colts beat the Steelers, but their other six wins came against teams with a combined record of 32-87. Six of their eight wins came over teams that finished with one of the 10 worst records, including a sweep over the Titans and victories over the Patriots and Jaguars. If they had swept the Jags or beaten the Giants late in the season, they could have ridden multiple wins over the league’s worst teams to a winning record.

One of the privileges of playing in the AFC South is facing relatively easy opponents annually. By my schedule metric, which considers point differential by opponents in games not involving the Colts, Indy faced the league’s fourth-easiest schedule. That’s up to only 13th this season, per FPI, but if the Jags or Titans take a step forward, the Colts might have to face a league-average slate.

Breaking News from Adam Schefter

Download the ESPN app and enable Adam Schefter’s news alerts to receive push notifications for the latest updates first. Opt in by tapping the alerts bell in the top right corner. For more information, click here.

It’s not just which teams they played, but when the Colts played them and who was the opposing quarterback. Though they were dealing with their own quarterback situation each week, they avoided the opposing team’s preferred signal-caller more often than just about any other team. I track how often each team faces opposing No. 1 quarterbacks. Last season, just over 36% of pass attempts by opposing quarterbacks against Indianapolis came from QBs who likely weren’t their team’s preferred option if everybody was available. That included:

Four of the Colts’ eight wins came against backup quarterbacks, including their only two victories of the season against competitive teams. There’s no way to ensure they will face something short of their opposing team’s preferred option 35% of the time next season, and they weren’t very good against preferred starting quarterbacks.

The Colts might respond that their quarterback play will be better. It’s becoming increasingly difficult to see a path forward with Richardson. After adjusting for era, he had the worst completion percentage for any quarterback with 200 attempts or more in a season in NFL history, topping Akili Smith, Tim Tebow and Ryan Leaf. Richardson’s average pass traveled farther than any other passer last season, which helps explain some of the completion issues, but we don’t see quarterbacks miss as many receivers as he did.

Richardson led the league in yards per completion (14.4), which explains why his yards per dropback were 19th, ahead of Patrick Mahomes and Bo Nix. Richardson threw interceptions on 4.5% of his dropbacks, though, and even when factoring in his impact as a scrambler and on designed runs, Total QBR ranked him 27th in the league.

The quarterback just ahead of him in 26th? That was Daniel Jones. Though Jones might offer safer hands and a better interception rate, that comes with a lack of upside. He ranked 34th in yards per dropback last season, topping only Caleb Williams and Deshaun Watson. Jones’ 6.1 yards per attempt ranked 35th. And though Richardson’s athleticism allows him to avoid sacks, Jones has an 8.5% sack rate across six pro seasons. Sacks are better than interceptions, but they’re still drive-killers.

The other problem with this duo: Neither has a great track record for health. Richardson missed most of his rookie season because of a shoulder injury, then missed time in 2024 because of hip and back ailments (in addition to his midseason benching). He was reportedly battling shoulder soreness during OTAs before dislocating a finger on a hit earlier this preseason. It’s tough to project a full season for him, even if he were up to the challenge performance-wise.

play

0:45

Holder: Tyler Warren looks ‘fantastic’ at Colts camp

Stephen Holder breaks down how Colts first-round draft pick TE Tyler Warren is looking fantastic at Colts training camp.

Unfortunately, Jones has an even bigger list of injuries. He has torn his ACL, suffered a season-ending neck injury and missed games because of multiple hamstring and ankle issues. Leaving aside his season-ending run on the bench with the Vikings, he missed 22 of 90 possible games since taking over as the starter in New York early in the 2019 season. He has completed one healthy year in six pro campaigns: 2022, which was his only above-average season as a passer.

It feels like the Colts will be cycling between quarterbacks this season because of injuries or subpar play. They’re down two starters on the offensive line after Ryan Kelly and Will Fries signed with the Vikings, with Tanor Bortolini and Matt Goncalves likely earning promotions.

The Colts can exceed expectations in two ways. One is getting better-than-expected play at quarterback. It’s possible they get the 2022 version of Jones, or that Richardson takes an enormous leap forward. But are either of those scenarios very likely? (Note: The Colts named Jones the starter on Tuesday morning.)

The other is improving their defense, where they led the league in missed tackles by a considerable margin last season. General manager Chris Ballard made some good offseason moves to address a long-suffering secondary, signing Charvarius Ward and adding Cam Bynum. Both have been above-average tacklers. Moving on from safety Julian Blackmon and linebacker E.J. Speed could be addition by subtraction, in terms of missed tackles.

Swapping out Gus Bradley for creative former Bengals defensive coordinator Lou Anarumo should also be a positive, although the veteran coordinator couldn’t coax much out of the Cincinnati defense after a run to the Super Bowl in 2021. With more starting quarterbacks on the way and questions about what the Colts can offer under center, there are too many scenarios where they struggle to make it back to eight wins.

Record in 2024: 15-2
Point differential in 2024: plus-222
2024 record in games decided by seven or fewer points: 7-2
Projected strength of schedule, via ESPN’s FPI: Second toughest in NFL

Unlike their 15-win counterparts in the AFC, the Lions have a much stronger case to be considered something close to a dominant team, at least based on how they played in the regular season. They beat teams by an average of more than 13 points per contest and had one of the 10 best point differentials per game since 1989. Six of the nine teams that finished with better point differentials than the 2024 Lions made it to the Super Bowl.

The Lions went 7-2 in one-score games, but again, they weren’t as reliant on narrow victories as the Chiefs. Detroit needed a late field goal to avoid a loss to the Vikings and kicked some more as time expired to break ties against the Texans and Packers, but they also had a handful of one-score games that looked close only because of late touchdowns in garbage time by the opposing offense.

And though the Lions were eliminated at home in a 45-31 loss to the Commanders in the divisional round, Detroit fans have a legitimate, significant excuse: Some of them were being called out of the stands to play cornerback against Jayden Daniels. The Lions were down virtually all of their significant pass rushers and multiple starting defensive backs by game’s end. Coordinator Aaron Glenn kept the defense afloat without Aidan Hutchinson and Alim McNeill by repeatedly turning the blitz meter higher and higher, but the Lions finally broke against a very good offense. They couldn’t survive turning the ball over five times with a defense in tatters.

Every year, something I hear from fans is that there’s some element of their team that can’t be worse than it was a year ago. Usually, that isn’t true. One of the few exceptions I’m considering is the health of the Detroit defense. Glenn’s unit ranked last in adjusted games lost. It was the sixth-most-injured defense of the past 25 seasons. The Lions will be healthier on defense this season, which could lead to them being better than last season.

The missing piece of information, as the FTN Football Almanac notes, is what happened on the other side of the ball. While everyone rightly noticed the Lions’ defense was an injured wreck, the Lions’ offense was spectacularly healthy. Detroit had the league’s second-healthiest offense in 2024. Depending on who you consider to be starters, its top 11 players missed just 10 games last season: Three from left tackle Taylor Decker, three more by running back David Montgomery, and one each from guard Graham Glasgow, center Frank Ragnow, tight end Sam LaPorta and guard Kevin Zeitler.

The Lions finished 25th in combined AGL; they should be healthier this season, but more injuries on offense likely will offset some of the improvements on defense. They’re already down defensive lineman Levi Onwuzurike and cornerback Ennis Rakestraw, both of whom are out for the season.

The other reason for concern about the offense looms in the middle of the line. While the Lions have great tackles in Decker and superstar Penei Sewell, the interior of their line is suddenly an obvious place for opposing teams to attack. They lost Jonah Jackson last year and replaced him with a solid veteran in Zeitler, who left for Tennessee in the offseason. Ragnow, a four-time Pro Bowler, unexpectedly retired at 29.

Now, the Lions are moving around players. They used a second-round pick on Tate Ratledge and intended to move him to center, but several days into camp, they shifted him back to guard and pushed Glasgow to center. The new starter at left guard will be Christian Mahogany, a 2024 sixth-round pick who looked promising in two spot starts last season, but that was alongside Ragnow, one of the league’s best centers. Coach Dan Campbell and general manager Brad Holmes deserve some benefit of the doubt based on their success, but it’s fair to be nervous that a line with two inexperienced starters and three players in new spots will take some time to jell, if not struggle notably.

That’s a real concern because keeping Jared Goff unbothered and free to operate within the pocket has been essential. Every quarterback gets worse under pressure, but Goff has bigger splits than any other passer. Over the past three seasons, he leads all quarterbacks in Total QBR (78.2) when opposing defenses don’t get home with pressure. When they do, his 17.6 QBR is 28th. If the Lions can’t handle interior pressure, teams will give Goff fits. Keep in mind that the Bears (Grady Jarrett) and Vikings (Javon Hargrave and Jonathan Allen) added veteran defensive tackles with pass-rush bite this offseason.

There’s also uncertainty about whether the Lions will have as many answers from their coaching staff after losing Glenn and Ben Johnson to head coaching gigs elsewhere. Campbell brought back John Morton from Denver as his offensive coordinator and promoted linebackers coach Kelvin Sheppard as the defensive coordinator. It’s admirable to see a coach promote from within, and Johnson wasn’t a household name before he emerged as the league’s hottest coordinator over the past two years, but the bar here on both sides of the ball is extremely high.

play

1:15

Why Stephen A. expects the Lions will make another deep playoff run

Stephen A. Smith explains why he would take the Lions over the Rams in the NFC this season.

The vast majority of coordinators don’t do a good enough job to earn head coaching opportunities elsewhere, especially if they haven’t been a head coach before. The 2023 Eagles are an example of a team that lost both of its coordinators, promoted from within on one side of the ball (Brian Johnson), added someone it respected on the other (Vic Fangio disciple Sean Desai) and fired both before the start of the next season. I’m not saying that’s about to happen in Detroit, but it’s only realistic to believe the Lions will struggle to get the same caliber of game planning and adjustments that Johnson and Glenn delivered weekly from a pair of relatively inexperienced coordinators.

Also, Detroit’s schedule will be tough, but that’s nothing new for the Lions; they faced the league’s sixth-toughest slate a year ago, so moving up to its second-toughest schedule shouldn’t be overwhelming. Eleven of their 17 games come against teams that made it to the playoffs in 2024, and while that can be an outdated measure of which teams could be tough by the time we get through 2025, nine of their games are against teams FPI projects to be playoff teams in 2025, a list that doesn’t include the Vikings and Steelers.

FPI is arguably more pessimistic about the Lions than I expect most people would believe. Though the model gives them the fifth-highest playoff odds, it believes Detroit has a 35% chance of missing the playoffs, likely because of the stiff competition in the division. I’d be shocked if the Lions became this year’s 49ers and missed the postseason, but I’d expect Detroit to settle back in the 12-win range after last season’s two-loss campaign.



Source link

August 20, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • 2

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (1,098)
  • Esports (800)
  • Game Reviews (730)
  • Game Updates (906)
  • GameFi Guides (1,058)
  • Gaming Gear (960)
  • NFT Gaming (1,079)
  • Product Reviews (960)

Recent Posts

  • Battlefield 6 physical copies are content complete and require no initial install, according to early copy holders
  • KPop Demon Hunters Uploaded A New Song, But Something’s Off
  • One of Borderlands’ most hated characters seems to have been cut from Borderlands 4
  • Dyson Is Offloading Its V8 Plus Model, Now Cheaper Than Entry-Level Cordless Vacuums
  • Nintendo posts cute and mysterious animated short film, but is it teasing Pikmin?

Recent Posts

  • Battlefield 6 physical copies are content complete and require no initial install, according to early copy holders

    October 8, 2025
  • KPop Demon Hunters Uploaded A New Song, But Something’s Off

    October 8, 2025
  • One of Borderlands’ most hated characters seems to have been cut from Borderlands 4

    October 7, 2025
  • Dyson Is Offloading Its V8 Plus Model, Now Cheaper Than Entry-Level Cordless Vacuums

    October 7, 2025
  • Nintendo posts cute and mysterious animated short film, but is it teasing Pikmin?

    October 7, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • Battlefield 6 physical copies are content complete and require no initial install, according to early copy holders

    October 8, 2025
  • KPop Demon Hunters Uploaded A New Song, But Something’s Off

    October 8, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close