Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

Decline

Predicting NFL teams most likely to decline in 2025 season
Esports

Predicting NFL teams most likely to decline in 2025 season

by admin August 20, 2025


  • Bill BarnwellAug 19, 2025, 06:15 AM ET

    Close

      Bill Barnwell is a senior NFL writer for ESPN.com. He analyzes football on and off the field like no one else on the planet, writing about in-season X’s and O’s, offseason transactions and so much more.

      He is the host of the Bill Barnwell Show podcast, with episodes released weekly. Barnwell joined ESPN in 2011 as a staff writer at Grantland.

I’ve been looking forward to this column for months. On Monday, I published my annual look at the five teams most likely to improve in the upcoming NFL season. In the years I’ve been writing that column, those teams have improved 31 of 38 times, or more than 81% of the time.

Each year, I also break down the teams that are most likely to decline. This column has had a virtually identical success rate; after last year, it’s 30 for 38. It went 3-2 last year, correctly pegging the Ravens (who dropped from 13-4 to 12-5), Giants (6-11 to 3-14) and Browns (11-6 to 3-14) as teams that would lose more games.

The two that defied my predictions will stick in my mind for a while. The Steelers defied the odds again, maintaining their 10-7 record. They’re responsible for two of those eight times in which a team didn’t decline, and the Steelers came within one win of doing it a third time in 2022. Spoiler: They’re not on my list below.

The other team did a little more than maintain its record from the previous season. The Eagles did not decline from their 11-6 mark in 2023. They went 14-3, then followed that by blitzing through the NFC playoffs and blowing out the Chiefs in Super Bowl LX. When I ranked the top 25 teams of the past 25 years earlier this offseason, I put the 2024 Eagles at No. 4. After their early-season bye, they were comfortably the league’s best team.

So, what did I miss? A massive improvement in their underlying level of play, driven by better players and coaching. This column uses 2024 data and underlying metrics to estimate each team’s true level of performance. Though every team makes offseason changes, history tells us the information from the previous season helps predict what will happen in the year to come.

Subscribe: ‘The Bill Barnwell Show’
More: Predicting teams that will win more games

The Eagles’ changes turned out to be more impactful than almost any in recent memory. It’s rare for a team to land a player in free agency who becomes a first-team All-Pro. General manager Howie Roseman signed two — running back Saquon Barkley and linebacker Zack Baun. After cornerback was a major problem in 2023, Roseman used his first two picks in the draft on Quinyon Mitchell and Cooper DeJean. I wrote last year that rookie cornerbacks often struggle in their debut seasons, which is true, but often doesn’t mean always. Mitchell and DeJean were stars, with the Eagles morphing from one of the league’s worst defenses by EPA per play during their 2-2 start to the league’s best once DeJean entered the lineup in the slot.

Editor’s Picks

2 Related

The Eagles also made strong upgrades at coordinator, as Vic Fangio and Kellen Moore were excellent. Throw in some of the league’s second-healthiest season by adjusted games lost, a 7-2 record in one-score games and the fifth-easiest schedule, and it was a special campaign.

Should I have seen that coming? Maybe. Barkley was going from what might have been the league’s worst situation for running backs to arguably its best, although the concern for him has usually been health, not ability. He was a revelation last season. Fangio and Moore had essentially been fired from their prior jobs, but Fangio was excellent with the Bears and 49ers, and the Eagles were a disaster with Matt Patricia as defensive coordinator by the end of 2023. I thought they could be better on defense but didn’t expect them to be the league’s best for most of the season. They had one of the league’s easiest projected schedules, which I shouldn’t have discounted. If you saw Baun turning into the league’s most productive linebacker, well, I suspect there are quite a few NFL teams that would like to hire you.

Of course, the Eagles were also in the decline column in 2023, when they dropped from 14-3 to 11-6 and then got blown out in the postseason. (Guess which season I heard more about on social media.) The same data that was unreliable and got Philadelphia utterly wrong in 2024 raised concerns about its health and defense and suggested it would have “10 to 12 wins” in 2023.

Being right in 2023 doesn’t make me any less wrong about 2024, but it reinforces how difficult it is to project the season ahead. The Browns and Eagles had the same record in 2023. Data is often helpful in trying to make predictions, but it’s no match for a team adding four Pro Bowl-plus players and dramatically improving its play. All I can do is tip my cap.

Jump to a team:
Chiefs | Colts
Commanders | Lions | Vikings

Record in 2024: 15-2
Point differential in 2024: plus-59
2024 record in games decided by seven or fewer points: 10-0
Projected strength of schedule, via ESPN’s FPI: Sixth toughest in NFL

Two years after the Vikings became the first team in league history to go 9-0 in games decided by seven points or fewer, the Chiefs took things a step further. Andy Reid’s team was an unprecedented 10-0 in one-score games last season. And as always, while there are situations in which a late score can make a game look closer than it actually was, the Chiefs really were getting opponents to slip on banana peels and knock themselves out at the most opportune times. Let’s relive just how narrow so many of Kansas City’s victories were:

  • In the season opener, a Lamar Jackson touchdown pass to Isaiah Likely as time expired seemed to extend the game. As the Ravens were about to line up for a two-pointer, a review found that Likely was out of bounds by half of a toenail, ending the contest.

  • The following week, the Chiefs faced a fourth-and-16 with 48 seconds left against the Bengals, only to be bailed out by a 29-yard pass interference penalty on rookie safety Daijahn Anthony. (Before the conspiracy theorists weigh in, keep in mind that a 21-yard conversion on the prior fourth-and-6 was wiped off by an illegal hands to the face penalty on Chiefs tackle Wanya Morris.) The penalty set up a game-winning field goal from 51 yards out by Harrison Butker.

  • In Week 3, defending a five-point lead in the fourth quarter, the Chiefs came up with two red zone stops on consecutive drives to stop the Falcons, including a controversial no-call on what looked to be pass interference against Kyle Pitts.

  • Six weeks later, a Baker Mayfield two-minute drill produced a touchdown pass with 30 seconds to go. Unlike the Ravens in Week 1, Tampa Bay coach Todd Bowles elected to kick an extra point and send the game to overtime, where the Chiefs won the coin toss and marched downfield for a touchdown.

  • The following week, the Broncos were in position to seal a statement victory over their divisional rivals, but Leo Chenal blocked a 35-yard field goal attempt that would have won the game for Denver, handing the Chiefs a 16-14 win.

  • In Week 12, the Panthers drove downfield for a game-tying touchdown and two-pointer, aided by a pair of pass interference penalties on Kansas City. With 1:46 to go, a Patrick Mahomes 33-yard scramble got the Chiefs into range for a short field goal to win at the buzzer.

  • In Week 13, the Chiefs somehow survived a pair of Raiders drives to hold onto a two-point lead in the fourth quarter. Daniel Carlson missed a 58-yard field goal that would have given Las Vegas the lead with 2:21 to go, and after a Kansas City three-and-out took just 14 seconds off the clock, the Raiders drove into position for another field goal, only to lose the ball on an aborted shotgun snap with 14 seconds left.

  • In Week 14, after a Cameron Dicker field goal gave the Chargers a two-point lead with 4:39 to go, Mahomes & Co. converted three consecutive third downs to drive downfield and eat up the clock. Then, a Matthew Wright field goal bounced off the uprights and in, clinching a ninth consecutive division title.

A pair of seven-point victories over the Chargers and Raiders weren’t quite as close. Maybe it’s unfair to include the Panthers game when Carolina never had the ball with a chance to tie the game or take the lead. There’s no guarantee the Buccaneers or Ravens would have converted their two-pointers, or that the Raiders or Broncos would have hit their field goals to win their respective games. Maybe it’s not fair to treat these games as some collective combination of Chiefs magic and spectacular luck.

And yet, at the same time, you really have to blindly believe to treat this as proof of a dominant team turning on the gas when it most needed it. Was it Mahomes and the offense coming up with key plays at the exact right time? Some weeks, yes. Against the Ravens, Falcons, Bucs, Panthers and Raiders, though, the Chiefs had a chance to chew up the clock and seal victories with first downs but couldn’t sustain their drives, handing the ball back to the opposing team. Most of those drives were three-and-outs.

play

1:42

Why Stephen A. says the Chiefs’ road back to the SB is hard

Stephen A. Smith discusses the improved AFC teams and why the Chiefs have a harder route to return to the Super Bowl than the Eagles.

Was it Steve Spagnuolo’s opportunistic defense closing the door with a well-timed blitz or big play, as Kansas City did against the Bills in the AFC title game? Again, only sometimes. The Chiefs blew late leads on defense against the Bucs and Panthers and came within an inch of doing so against the Ravens. The Falcons drove twice into the red zone and were let down by a missed call in the end zone that would have given them first-and-goal on the 1-yard line. The Broncos converted three third downs to get into field goal range before the Chenal block. Las Vegas quarterback Aidan O’Connell converted five straight passes to get into field goal range before the bungled exchange. That isn’t the résumé of a great defense shutting down teams when the game’s on the line, even if the results ended up looking good for Kansas City.

Do the Chiefs have a psychic hold late in games on the rest of the league? Depends on when you look. They went 8-0 in one-score games in 2021 and 10-0 in those same contests last season. In Mahomes’ other seasons as the starter, they went 25-17 in those one-score contests with him on the field, including a 3-4 mark in 2023. That total — 43-17 — is a spectacular record in one-score games, but even treating Mahomes as an outlier relative to the rest of the league (and I’m willing to believe that possibility), 10-0 is impossibly unsustainable.

The Chiefs had the point differential of a 10.2-win team, owing in part to a 38-0 loss to the Broncos in Week 18 when Mahomes and virtually every other star took most (or all) of the game off. Remove that game and the Chiefs went 15-1 with a 10.7-win point differential. Every other 14-plus win team since 1989 had a point differential of 100 points or more, with their average point differential coming in at 190 points per 17 games. Kansas City had a point differential of plus-59.

The 2024 Chiefs finished the season with the largest gap between their actual record and Pythagorean expected record of any team since 1989, coming in just ahead of the 2022 Vikings. The 30 teams with the largest gap between those two figures over that time span declined by an average of 3.2 wins per 17 games. They went from outperforming their Pythagorean expectation by 3.2 wins to just 0.1 wins per team the following season. In other words, for the vast majority of these teams, they weren’t able to defy what history tells us about point differential for more than one season.

Could the Chiefs be the exception? Of course. Mahomes is the best quarterback of his generation. There’s significant talent on both sides of the ball, and the brain trust of Reid and Spagnuolo are back. The Chiefs spent all of last season dealing with a turnstile at left tackle, a problem they believe they’ve solved after signing Jaylon Moore and drafting Josh Simmons in Round 1. They didn’t have wideout Rashee Rice for most of the season after a knee injury in September, and Isiah Pacheco’s fractured fibula neutered the run game. They converted just under 54% of their red zone trips into touchdowns, the worst rate they have posted in a single season during the Mahomes era. As we saw with the Eagles last season, one way to defy what the numbers suggest is to massively improve your underlying level of play.

Even if the Chiefs improve on a play-by-play basis, there’s a huge gap between the team they were a year ago and what their record suggested. The left side of their line is a huge question mark between tackle and guard, where Kingsley Suamataia might settle after flaming out at tackle. They lost an underrated veteran in safety Justin Reid, who was one of the league’s best tacklers during his time in Kansas City. Rice is likely to miss time with a potential suspension, and tight end Travis Kelce took a major step backward in his age-35 season. Opposing kickers hit a league-low 81.8% of their kicks against Kansas City in 2024, including misses and blocks at the most inopportune times. Can the Chiefs really count on that again?

Of course, all of this isn’t to suggest the Chiefs will be anything short of a Super Bowl contender. They were on this very list before the 2021 season, when they fell from 14-2 to 12-5. That team came within a few yards of making it back to the Super Bowl. Twelve wins and another deep playoff run seem like a reasonable expectation for this team, too.

Record in 2024: 14-3
Point differential in 2024: plus-100
2024 record in games decided by seven or fewer points: 8-1
Projected strength of schedule, via ESPN’s FPI: Fourth toughest in NFL

After mentioning the 2022 Vikings in the Chiefs’ conversation, perhaps it’s only fitting that Minnesota returns as the next team on this list. The 2022 Vikings were one of the more obvious candidates I’ve ever seen for decline, as they went 13-4 while being outscored by three points. That team finished 28th in DVOA, suggesting they were, on a snap-by-snap basis, one of the league’s worst teams. They were immediately bounced from the playoffs at home by a Giants team that ranked 23rd by the same metric.

The 2024 Vikings were different. For one, they were much better. They went 14-3 with the league’s seventh-best DVOA. They played the ninth-toughest schedule. The 2022 Vikings were passengers on defense, with coordinator Ed Donatell fielding one of the most confusingly passive units in recent memory. The 2024 Vikings were the league’s most entertaining and perhaps its most aggressive defense, throwing everything from Cover-0 blitzes to drop-eight coverages from the same pre-snap looks and confounding opposing quarterbacks in the process.

Pigskin Pick ‘Em

FREE to play. Create up to 5 entries and compete for 57 prizes worth $100K. Make Your Picks

The Vikings went 8-1 in one-score games last season. If they had done that after the 2022 season, Kevin O’Connell would be lauded as the game management wizard of his generation. Instead, they went 4-8 in one-score games between those two seasons, and while things might have been different if Kirk Cousins had stayed healthy, four of those losses came in the first five weeks, when Cousins was on the field. O’Connell is still an excellent coach, but he’s probably not going to win 88% of his close games again.

Let’s talk about that defense. Can the Vikings keep their level of play up? While acknowledging they have a great front seven and an excellent coordinator, I’d be a little nervous. They led the league in turnovers (33) and were second in turnover rate (16.6% of opposing drives), trailing only the Bills. Defense is more difficult to sustain than offense, and successful defenses built around high turnover margins are even tougher to maintain from year to year. The Bills were able to do that between 2023 and 2024, but the other teams directly below them in turnover rate two years ago were the 49ers, Bears, Cowboys, Ravens and Saints, none of whom were able to sustain their takeaway rate in 2024. Their defenses all took a meaningful step backward.

That’s not a one-year trend, either. Looking at 2000 to 2023 and the teams that ranked in the top five in turnovers per drive — as the Vikings did a year ago — just 17% of those teams finished in the top five again the following season. Their average rank in turnover rate was 15th. Minnesota could certainly field an excellent defense again, but it probably won’t lead the league in turnovers.

Are there reasons to think the Vikings will simply field better defensive talent? I’m not sure. They were the league’s fifth-healthiest defense a year ago by adjusted games lost, per the new FTN Football Almanac, and they fielded the league’s oldest defense on a snap-weighted age basis. In fact, with the league’s fifth-oldest offense, they were the league’s oldest team on a play-by-play basis. That isn’t inherently disqualifying, but it’s a reality of where they were with their roster construction.

The Vikings were able to get very good play from three veteran cornerbacks in Byron Murphy, Stephon Gilmore and Shaq Griffin. Gilmore and Griffin are gone, so they will be younger at the position, but the players replacing the three veterans haven’t been great elsewhere. Isaiah Rodgers was buried on the depth chart in Philadelphia, while Jeff Okudah and Tavierre Thomas have bounced around the league with limited results. Minnesota is better-equipped to handle the departure of starting safety Cam Bynum, who left as part of the various free agent exchanges the Colts and Vikings made this offseason, but it’s fair to say the expectations for the secondary have to be below what Vikings fans saw last season.

They’ll try to make up for it on the front end, where they … got older by importing two new defensive tackles on the wrong side of 30. Jonathan Allen and Javon Hargrave were both stars earlier in their career, but they combined to play just 11 games last season because of injuries. Allen and Hargrave are big swings, and general manager Kwesi Adofo-Mensah has generally done excellent work in free agency, so there are reasons to be optimistic the Vikings’ front will be even more devastating than it was in 2024.

Adofo-Mensah upgraded the interior of the offensive line, too, bringing in Ryan Kelly and Will Fries from Indianapolis before using his first-round pick on guard Donovan Jackson. The interior line has been a weakness seemingly since the Steve Hutchinson days, so I can’t take any issue with the idea of upgrading those spots. In practice, they should be better than the Ed Ingrams and Garrett Bradburys of the world, but Fries is coming off a broken leg, while Kelly is 32 and hasn’t been the same player he was during his peak seasons. The Vikings also get back left tackle Christian Darrisaw after he suffered a season-ending torn ACL and MCL in midseason last year.

play

1:10

Why Damien Woody trusts Kevin O’Connell

Damien Woody explains why he expects Kevin O’Connell to get the best out of J.J. McCarthy with the Vikings.

The most notable player returning from injury is quarterback J.J. McCarthy. He’ll take over for Sam Darnold, who ranked 14th in Total QBR last season. While Darnold averaged nearly 8.0 yards per attempt in a resurgent performance, he threw 12 interceptions, fumbled eight times and took sacks on more than 8% of his dropbacks. The Vikings were tied for the fourth-most drives in the league, which inflated some of his cumulative stats, both good and bad.

One way for the Vikings and McCarthy to overcome any sort of turnover-induced dip on defense would be to simply protect the ball more reliably. They ranked 18th in turnover rate on a drive-by-drive basis, and they scored just two touchdowns across the 45 drives in which Darnold took at least one sack. They seem set to move toward more of a rotation at running back after Aaron Jones fumbled five times last season. If McCarthy protects the football and takes drive-destroying sacks less often, Minnesota could improve by avoiding negative plays more often.

The Vikings are a pretty unique team. The age of their roster and the moves they have made suggest they’re trying to win right now, but they have what essentially amounts to a rookie quarterback leading the way. And while we normally associate debuting quarterbacks with subpar teams and young rosters, McCarthy is taking over a 14-win team, something I’m not sure has ever happened in the modern era. I’m not expecting a dropoff below .500 like the one we saw in 2023, but a record more in line with their 11.1-win point differential from 2024 would make sense.

Record in 2024: 12-5
Point differential in 2024: plus-94
2024 record in games decided by seven or fewer points: 8-2
Projected strength of schedule, via ESPN’s FPI: Seventh toughest in NFL

The Commanders join the Chiefs as teams that succeeded after being on last year’s most likely to improve list but are tabbed most likely to decline this season. Washington made one of the biggest single-season leaps in recent league history, improving from four wins in 2023 to 12 last season. Then, the Commanders beat the Bucs and Lions in the playoffs before running out of steam in the NFC title game against the Eagles.

Though I was optimistic about the Commanders last season, I thought they would win around eight games and didn’t expect them to make a deep playoff run. Last season, they fixed their biggest problem from the previous season, creating turnovers. The Commanders jumped from a minus-14 turnover margin in 2023 to plus-one last season, though that mostly occurred by dramatically cutting their turnovers on offense.

I hesitated comparing last year’s Commanders with the 2023 Texans, but that turned out to be a great comp in many ways. The Texans accelerated their rebuild by surrounding a talented young quarterback who cut down on the team’s giveaways with a defensive-minded coach and one of the league’s older rosters. In 2024, though they still won the AFC South, they stagnated a bit; the offseason improvements didn’t click, there weren’t many young players (other than Will Anderson Jr. and the secondary) who became impact contributors, and they relied too much on their young quarterback to bail them out. Houston was still good, but it didn’t take the next step many expected.

Read more on the NFL’s greatest

• Best all-time draft picks at every slot
• Introducing the ‘Bag’ Hall of Fame
• Our 53-man All Quarter Century team

We might see the same productions from the Commanders, who fielded the league’s seventh-oldest team last season on a snap-weighted age basis, despite quarterback Jayden Daniels and cornerback Mike Sainristil being wildly impressive in their debut seasons. Getting little out of the draft picks from the Ron Rivera era, general manager Adam Peters covered up holes throughout the roster by adding a bevy of veteran free agents, similar to what Nick Caserio did in Houston. There’s nothing wrong with that philosophy. Peters should be lauded for hitting on edge rusher Dante Fowler Jr., safety Jeremy Chinn, linebacker Frankie Luvu and center Tyler Biadasz, but some of those free agents are gone, and linebacker Bobby Wagner, 35, and tight end Zach Ertz, 34, are in their mid-30s.

Peters has also made aggressive trades to add veterans, and though there’s understandable logic behind those moves, they came at a cost to the Commanders. The deal for cornerback Marshon Lattimore didn’t deliver much last season. Offensive tackle Laremy Tunsil was brought in from the Texans, and Peters made a move with his former team to acquire wideout Deebo Samuel from the 49ers. Washington had just three top-200 picks in April’s draft as a result, and it will again field one of the league’s oldest teams. That means there aren’t a ton of young players on this roster who might improve in 2025.

The Commanders need those players because they might not have the same fortune they had in 2024. They were the league’s fifth-healthiest team by adjusted games lost, ranking among the six healthiest offenses and defenses. That doesn’t include Sam Cosmi, who was Washington’s best lineman for most of 2024 before he suffered a torn ACL in the postseason. It’s unclear whether he’ll be healthy enough to start the season on the active roster.

The Commanders went 8-2 in one-score games and enjoyed more incredible moments than some teams have in a decade. That record doesn’t even include the 86-yard touchdown pass Daniels threw to Terry McLaurin with 21 seconds left against the Cowboys in a game the Commanders eventually lost by eight points. (I don’t treat eight-point margins as one-score games because teams can’t win the game on a single drive and to allow for comparisons between now and the pre-2-point conversion era. If you prefer to consider eight points as a one-score game, the Commanders went 8-4 in those contests.)

Washington’s wildest victory, of course, was decided on the Hail Mary that snatched victory away from the Bears, seemingly sending Chicago into a tailspin. That was the most dramatic of the Commanders’ narrow wins, but it wasn’t the only unlikely or impossibly close triumph:

  • In Week 2, with the score tied at 18, Malik Nabers dropped a fourth-down pass that would have given the Giants a first down with 2:04 to go. The Commanders would have had the two-minute warning and all of their timeouts to stop the Giants, but New York would have been in position to kick a field goal to take the lead, if not score a touchdown. Instead, Daniels hit Noah Brown for a 34-yard gain two plays later, and Washington kicked a game-winning field goal.

  • In Week 15, Spencer Rattler threw a touchdown pass to Foster Moreau with no time remaining, bringing the Saints within one point. Interim coach Darren Rizzi (correctly) went for two and the win, but Rattler’s pass was broken up for a Commanders victory.

  • The following week, after Daniels’ interception late in the fourth quarter of a three-point game, the Eagles were in position to close out the game. Facing a third-and-5 with 2:07 to go, a wide-open DeVonta Smith dropped a pass that would have allowed the Eagles to run the clock down within 30 seconds and drain the Commanders of their timeouts. Instead, Philadelphia kicked a field goal to go up five, and Daniels marched Washington downfield with one timeout for a game-winning touchdown.

  • In Week 17, the Commanders allowed a late touchdown drive to Michael Penix Jr. to tie the score. After a three-and-out, the Falcons drove back into field goal range for the potential winning kick, but backup kicker Riley Patterson missed a 56-yard attempt as time expired. The Commanders won the coin toss and scored a touchdown on the only drive of overtime.

  • And finally, in Week 18, Marcus Mariota ran for 33 yards on a fourth-and-1 with 33 seconds to go to extend the game against Dallas before hitting McLaurin for a touchdown pass with six seconds left, earning Washington a 23-19 victory.

Is Daniels devastating when defenses give him an opportunity to win the game in the fourth quarter or overtime? Absolutely. Was he lucky to get so many opportunities after drops by the other team and missed field goal attempts at inopportune times? Of course. And when teams scored late and made their 2-point conversions to take the lead — as the Bears did with 27 seconds left in Washington — there was even more magic waiting from the rookie sensation. It’s tough to see Daniels getting that many opportunities again, even if he’s up to the task of succeeding when he does.

play

1:11

What is holding up Terry McLaurin’s contract talks with the Commanders?

Adam Schefter discusses if the Commanders can reach an agreement on Terry McLaurin’s contract.

There’s one more thing that is incredibly important to the 2024 Commanders and is unlikely to recur: what they did on fourth down. Coach Dan Quinn and offensive coordinator Kliff Kingsbury should be lauded for leaning into the strength of their team and staying aggressive on fourth down, but the results were almost unprecedented. When they needed a fourth-down conversion, Daniels came through more often than anybody could expect.

During the regular season, the Commanders went 20-of-23 on fourth downs, good for an 87% conversion clip. That was 14 percentage points better than any other team last season. ESPN has fourth-down data going back to 2000, and no team has gone for it on fourth down more than 10 times in a season and converted more often than Washington did in 2024.

The Commanders scored 115 points on drives after converting at least one fourth down, the most by any team over that span. Given how conservative teams were on fourth down before attitudes changed about analytics over the past decade, I would strongly suspect no team has scored more points from its fourth-down approach in NFL history than the 2024 Commanders.

Daniels & Co. will give opposing defenses pause on fourth downs, but asking them to convert at historically high rates is too much. That was a special season, and assuming Daniels stays healthy, the Commanders should be in the mix for a playoff berth again. But it will be something closer to a consolidation year than the next step toward greatness in the DMV.

Record in 2024: 8-9
Point differential in 2024: minus-50
2024 record in games decided by seven or fewer points: 7-4
Projected strength of schedule, via ESPN’s FPI: 13th easiest in NFL

Admit it: If you aren’t a fan of the franchise, did you know the Colts won eight games last season? With conversations about them dominated by the Anthony Richardson discussion, it feels like they were one of the league’s worst teams. In reality, they weren’t great, but they were within one game of a winning record. They had the point differential of a 7.3-win team, which means they outperformed their underlying performance by just under one victory; that’s not usually a team I would target here.

And yet, if you look at those eight wins more closely, it’s hard to feel like the Colts were on the same level with, say, the Cardinals or Falcons. The Colts beat the Steelers, but their other six wins came against teams with a combined record of 32-87. Six of their eight wins came over teams that finished with one of the 10 worst records, including a sweep over the Titans and victories over the Patriots and Jaguars. If they had swept the Jags or beaten the Giants late in the season, they could have ridden multiple wins over the league’s worst teams to a winning record.

One of the privileges of playing in the AFC South is facing relatively easy opponents annually. By my schedule metric, which considers point differential by opponents in games not involving the Colts, Indy faced the league’s fourth-easiest schedule. That’s up to only 13th this season, per FPI, but if the Jags or Titans take a step forward, the Colts might have to face a league-average slate.

Breaking News from Adam Schefter

Download the ESPN app and enable Adam Schefter’s news alerts to receive push notifications for the latest updates first. Opt in by tapping the alerts bell in the top right corner. For more information, click here.

It’s not just which teams they played, but when the Colts played them and who was the opposing quarterback. Though they were dealing with their own quarterback situation each week, they avoided the opposing team’s preferred signal-caller more often than just about any other team. I track how often each team faces opposing No. 1 quarterbacks. Last season, just over 36% of pass attempts by opposing quarterbacks against Indianapolis came from QBs who likely weren’t their team’s preferred option if everybody was available. That included:

Four of the Colts’ eight wins came against backup quarterbacks, including their only two victories of the season against competitive teams. There’s no way to ensure they will face something short of their opposing team’s preferred option 35% of the time next season, and they weren’t very good against preferred starting quarterbacks.

The Colts might respond that their quarterback play will be better. It’s becoming increasingly difficult to see a path forward with Richardson. After adjusting for era, he had the worst completion percentage for any quarterback with 200 attempts or more in a season in NFL history, topping Akili Smith, Tim Tebow and Ryan Leaf. Richardson’s average pass traveled farther than any other passer last season, which helps explain some of the completion issues, but we don’t see quarterbacks miss as many receivers as he did.

Richardson led the league in yards per completion (14.4), which explains why his yards per dropback were 19th, ahead of Patrick Mahomes and Bo Nix. Richardson threw interceptions on 4.5% of his dropbacks, though, and even when factoring in his impact as a scrambler and on designed runs, Total QBR ranked him 27th in the league.

The quarterback just ahead of him in 26th? That was Daniel Jones. Though Jones might offer safer hands and a better interception rate, that comes with a lack of upside. He ranked 34th in yards per dropback last season, topping only Caleb Williams and Deshaun Watson. Jones’ 6.1 yards per attempt ranked 35th. And though Richardson’s athleticism allows him to avoid sacks, Jones has an 8.5% sack rate across six pro seasons. Sacks are better than interceptions, but they’re still drive-killers.

The other problem with this duo: Neither has a great track record for health. Richardson missed most of his rookie season because of a shoulder injury, then missed time in 2024 because of hip and back ailments (in addition to his midseason benching). He was reportedly battling shoulder soreness during OTAs before dislocating a finger on a hit earlier this preseason. It’s tough to project a full season for him, even if he were up to the challenge performance-wise.

play

0:45

Holder: Tyler Warren looks ‘fantastic’ at Colts camp

Stephen Holder breaks down how Colts first-round draft pick TE Tyler Warren is looking fantastic at Colts training camp.

Unfortunately, Jones has an even bigger list of injuries. He has torn his ACL, suffered a season-ending neck injury and missed games because of multiple hamstring and ankle issues. Leaving aside his season-ending run on the bench with the Vikings, he missed 22 of 90 possible games since taking over as the starter in New York early in the 2019 season. He has completed one healthy year in six pro campaigns: 2022, which was his only above-average season as a passer.

It feels like the Colts will be cycling between quarterbacks this season because of injuries or subpar play. They’re down two starters on the offensive line after Ryan Kelly and Will Fries signed with the Vikings, with Tanor Bortolini and Matt Goncalves likely earning promotions.

The Colts can exceed expectations in two ways. One is getting better-than-expected play at quarterback. It’s possible they get the 2022 version of Jones, or that Richardson takes an enormous leap forward. But are either of those scenarios very likely? (Note: The Colts named Jones the starter on Tuesday morning.)

The other is improving their defense, where they led the league in missed tackles by a considerable margin last season. General manager Chris Ballard made some good offseason moves to address a long-suffering secondary, signing Charvarius Ward and adding Cam Bynum. Both have been above-average tacklers. Moving on from safety Julian Blackmon and linebacker E.J. Speed could be addition by subtraction, in terms of missed tackles.

Swapping out Gus Bradley for creative former Bengals defensive coordinator Lou Anarumo should also be a positive, although the veteran coordinator couldn’t coax much out of the Cincinnati defense after a run to the Super Bowl in 2021. With more starting quarterbacks on the way and questions about what the Colts can offer under center, there are too many scenarios where they struggle to make it back to eight wins.

Record in 2024: 15-2
Point differential in 2024: plus-222
2024 record in games decided by seven or fewer points: 7-2
Projected strength of schedule, via ESPN’s FPI: Second toughest in NFL

Unlike their 15-win counterparts in the AFC, the Lions have a much stronger case to be considered something close to a dominant team, at least based on how they played in the regular season. They beat teams by an average of more than 13 points per contest and had one of the 10 best point differentials per game since 1989. Six of the nine teams that finished with better point differentials than the 2024 Lions made it to the Super Bowl.

The Lions went 7-2 in one-score games, but again, they weren’t as reliant on narrow victories as the Chiefs. Detroit needed a late field goal to avoid a loss to the Vikings and kicked some more as time expired to break ties against the Texans and Packers, but they also had a handful of one-score games that looked close only because of late touchdowns in garbage time by the opposing offense.

And though the Lions were eliminated at home in a 45-31 loss to the Commanders in the divisional round, Detroit fans have a legitimate, significant excuse: Some of them were being called out of the stands to play cornerback against Jayden Daniels. The Lions were down virtually all of their significant pass rushers and multiple starting defensive backs by game’s end. Coordinator Aaron Glenn kept the defense afloat without Aidan Hutchinson and Alim McNeill by repeatedly turning the blitz meter higher and higher, but the Lions finally broke against a very good offense. They couldn’t survive turning the ball over five times with a defense in tatters.

Every year, something I hear from fans is that there’s some element of their team that can’t be worse than it was a year ago. Usually, that isn’t true. One of the few exceptions I’m considering is the health of the Detroit defense. Glenn’s unit ranked last in adjusted games lost. It was the sixth-most-injured defense of the past 25 seasons. The Lions will be healthier on defense this season, which could lead to them being better than last season.

The missing piece of information, as the FTN Football Almanac notes, is what happened on the other side of the ball. While everyone rightly noticed the Lions’ defense was an injured wreck, the Lions’ offense was spectacularly healthy. Detroit had the league’s second-healthiest offense in 2024. Depending on who you consider to be starters, its top 11 players missed just 10 games last season: Three from left tackle Taylor Decker, three more by running back David Montgomery, and one each from guard Graham Glasgow, center Frank Ragnow, tight end Sam LaPorta and guard Kevin Zeitler.

The Lions finished 25th in combined AGL; they should be healthier this season, but more injuries on offense likely will offset some of the improvements on defense. They’re already down defensive lineman Levi Onwuzurike and cornerback Ennis Rakestraw, both of whom are out for the season.

The other reason for concern about the offense looms in the middle of the line. While the Lions have great tackles in Decker and superstar Penei Sewell, the interior of their line is suddenly an obvious place for opposing teams to attack. They lost Jonah Jackson last year and replaced him with a solid veteran in Zeitler, who left for Tennessee in the offseason. Ragnow, a four-time Pro Bowler, unexpectedly retired at 29.

Now, the Lions are moving around players. They used a second-round pick on Tate Ratledge and intended to move him to center, but several days into camp, they shifted him back to guard and pushed Glasgow to center. The new starter at left guard will be Christian Mahogany, a 2024 sixth-round pick who looked promising in two spot starts last season, but that was alongside Ragnow, one of the league’s best centers. Coach Dan Campbell and general manager Brad Holmes deserve some benefit of the doubt based on their success, but it’s fair to be nervous that a line with two inexperienced starters and three players in new spots will take some time to jell, if not struggle notably.

That’s a real concern because keeping Jared Goff unbothered and free to operate within the pocket has been essential. Every quarterback gets worse under pressure, but Goff has bigger splits than any other passer. Over the past three seasons, he leads all quarterbacks in Total QBR (78.2) when opposing defenses don’t get home with pressure. When they do, his 17.6 QBR is 28th. If the Lions can’t handle interior pressure, teams will give Goff fits. Keep in mind that the Bears (Grady Jarrett) and Vikings (Javon Hargrave and Jonathan Allen) added veteran defensive tackles with pass-rush bite this offseason.

There’s also uncertainty about whether the Lions will have as many answers from their coaching staff after losing Glenn and Ben Johnson to head coaching gigs elsewhere. Campbell brought back John Morton from Denver as his offensive coordinator and promoted linebackers coach Kelvin Sheppard as the defensive coordinator. It’s admirable to see a coach promote from within, and Johnson wasn’t a household name before he emerged as the league’s hottest coordinator over the past two years, but the bar here on both sides of the ball is extremely high.

play

1:15

Why Stephen A. expects the Lions will make another deep playoff run

Stephen A. Smith explains why he would take the Lions over the Rams in the NFC this season.

The vast majority of coordinators don’t do a good enough job to earn head coaching opportunities elsewhere, especially if they haven’t been a head coach before. The 2023 Eagles are an example of a team that lost both of its coordinators, promoted from within on one side of the ball (Brian Johnson), added someone it respected on the other (Vic Fangio disciple Sean Desai) and fired both before the start of the next season. I’m not saying that’s about to happen in Detroit, but it’s only realistic to believe the Lions will struggle to get the same caliber of game planning and adjustments that Johnson and Glenn delivered weekly from a pair of relatively inexperienced coordinators.

Also, Detroit’s schedule will be tough, but that’s nothing new for the Lions; they faced the league’s sixth-toughest slate a year ago, so moving up to its second-toughest schedule shouldn’t be overwhelming. Eleven of their 17 games come against teams that made it to the playoffs in 2024, and while that can be an outdated measure of which teams could be tough by the time we get through 2025, nine of their games are against teams FPI projects to be playoff teams in 2025, a list that doesn’t include the Vikings and Steelers.

FPI is arguably more pessimistic about the Lions than I expect most people would believe. Though the model gives them the fifth-highest playoff odds, it believes Detroit has a 35% chance of missing the playoffs, likely because of the stiff competition in the division. I’d be shocked if the Lions became this year’s 49ers and missed the postseason, but I’d expect Detroit to settle back in the 12-win range after last season’s two-loss campaign.



Source link

August 20, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
HBAR/USD (TradingView)
Crypto Trends

HBAR Suffers 7% Decline Amid Substantial Liquidation Cascade

by admin August 19, 2025



HBAR faced strong downward pressure in the last 24 hours, slipping 6.68% from $0.26 to $0.24, while trading activity surged past 109 million tokens—nearly double the daily average. The steepest drop occurred during overnight sessions, when sellers accelerated outflows and forced prices down at a pace far sharper than normal. Analysts attribute the volatility to broader market stress triggered by $460 million in liquidations, compounded by U.S. economic data showing the Producer Price Index rising to 3.3%.

Despite near-term weakness, market strategists maintain a bullish long-term outlook for Hedera’s native token. Targets remain set between $0.40 and $0.50, though traders are being warned of potential turbulence in the interim. With sentiment gauges pointing to overheated conditions, technical watchers caution that sharp swings remain likely as the market digests both macroeconomic headwinds and sudden liquidity shocks.

Meanwhile, Binance has moved to integrate HBAR within its BNB Smart Chain infrastructure, a step designed to improve cross-chain interoperability. The development will enable smoother asset transfers and expand access to smart contracts across blockchain ecosystems, bolstering Hedera’s utility. Still, the integration arrives as HBAR consolidates under resistance, underscoring the challenge of balancing long-term adoption narratives with short-term market pressures.

HBAR/USD (TradingView)

Technical Metrics

  • HBAR registered an aggregate trading range of $0.018, constituting 6.93% of peak valuation during the session.
  • Robust resistance consolidated proximate the $0.252 threshold with multiple rejection attempts.
  • Support infrastructure identified near $0.240, furnishing temporary price stabilisation.
  • Trading volumes exceeded 109 million tokens, markedly surpassing the 24-hour average of 58.5 million.
  • The terminal 20-minute period exhibited complete market paralysis at $0.243 on negligible volume, suggesting potential technical disruptions or acute illiquidity conditions.
  • Distinct resistance consolidation emerged around $0.245 during the final trading hour.
  • Provisional support materialised near the $0.242 level preceding market stagnation.

Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk’s full AI Policy.



Source link

August 19, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
RESOLV price crashes after initial rally: what’s going on?
Crypto Trends

Onyxcoin price plummets 11%: what triggered the decline?

by admin June 18, 2025



The token fell from $0.01421 to $0.01319 during Wednesday’s Asian evening session. The 10.98% plunge came without any clear news catalyst, suggesting a reaction to broader crypto market weakness and a technical retest of key support.

According to CoinMarketCap data, Onyxcoin (XCN) saw a volatile 10.98% correction during Wednesday’s Asian trading session, plummeting from its daily high of $0.01421 to a swing low of $0.01319 within hours.

As of press time, Onyxcoin had recovered slightly to trade at $0.01339, with the partial rebound coinciding with Bitcoin’s bounce above $104,000. XCN now faces immediate resistance at the $0.01380 breakdown point, while sustained buying pressure could see a retest of the $0.014 psychological level.

Why XCN price plunged

Several key factors help explain Wednesday’s tumble. Over the past week, XCN’s 24-hour trading volume has fluctuated between $24 million and $27 million, relatively modest compared to mid-cap peers, but still liquid enough for small order imbalances to cause sharp swings.

That backdrop means even modest order imbalances, whether profit‑taking by insiders or stops activated by bots, can trigger outsized moves. Despite the absence of any negative news, the broader altcoin sector has been under pressure as Bitcoin’s recent indecision and macro uncertainty weigh on sentiment.

In XCN’s case, the $0.01330–$0.01340 range acted as a short-term support zone. The token stabilized around $0.01339 in early U.S. hours as buyers stepped in to absorb recent liquidations.

Beyond market structure and sentiment, Onyxcoin’s fundamentals may also be contributing to fragility. The project’s ambitious shift toward Layer-3 infrastructure is now facing its first serious stress test, as the token struggles to hold critical support levels.

With less than two weeks remaining before crucial DAO votes conclude, traders are closely watching for updates. Draft proposals reviewed by crypto.news suggest a potential doubling of staking rewards—a move that could either provide short-term price support or trigger another wave of profit-taking.

For now, Onyxcoin remains caught between its long-term technical promise and the market’s short-term realities, a precarious position that’s become increasingly common for altcoins navigating 2025’s unpredictable crypto landscape.



Source link

June 18, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Bitcoin
NFT Gaming

Bitcoin SOPR Indicator Sees Steady Decline Even As BTC’s Price Rallies – Here’s What It Means

by admin June 13, 2025


Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Bitcoin’s price has displayed remarkable resilience as the largest crypto asset holds strong above the $100,000 milestone despite several pullback attempts. During the robust bullish performance of BTC in the past few weeks, on-chain data shows that the SOPR indicator has been dropping sharply.

Key Bitcoin SOPR Indicator Dips Sharply

As Bitcoin continues to show upside strength, Rafaela Romano, a crypto enthusiast, highlighted that a significant divergence is developing below the surface. In a surprising turn of events, Bitcoin’s Spent Output Profit Ratio (SOPR) Indicator has witnessed a notable decline amidst a stunning rise in BTC’s price.

The crypto enthusiast reported the unusual development in a recent post on the X platform. In the past, the SOPR indicator, a key on-chain metric used to gauge overall market profitability, has aligned strongly with BTC’s performance.

 When the price climbs, the Spent Output Profit Ratio rises as well, hitting new highs at every new price point. Such an alignment between price movements and the indicator’s upside move is reflected by huge profit-taking from investors and traders during price spikes.

SOPR on a downward trend | Source: Rafaela Romano on X

However, while Bitcoin’s price has risen strongly and is holding beyond the $100,000 mark, this metric has been falling at a rapid pace. “Interestingly, the price of Bitcoin has been rising, but profit-taking is not keeping up,” the crypto enthusiast stated.

This current divergence suggests that many investors are confident about the flagship asset’s prospects in the short term as they continue to accumulate and hold their coins. According to the enthusiast, the trend is a sign that BTC holders, especially seasoned investors or long-term holders, still consider the $100,000 level a cheap value. 

A bullish sentiment of this magnitude among seasoned investors could pave the way for BTC’s next major rally in the short term as long as these key players continue to purchase the asset.

A Weakened BTC Net Realized Profits

Investors’ conviction in Bitcoin is undoubtedly growing strong in the current market environment. Another crucial indication of waning profit-taking by investors is a continued decrease in the BTC Net Realized Profit.

Related Reading: Bitcoin Long-Term Holders Strengthen Their Grip As Realized Cap Climbs To Uncharted Territory

As reported by Darkfost, a verified author and on-chain expert, this metric has decreased even as BTC maintains its upside trajectory compared to past scenarios. In early 2024, when Bitcoin reached a top, the net realized profits rose to $3.5 billion. Also, when the asset climbed to its previous top in January this year, profit-taking grew to $4.5 billion.

Meanwhile, data shows that profit-taking declined sharply to $1.8 billion following BTC’s surge to its current top in May. Currently, realized profits have decreased further, dropping to barely $700 million in the last seven days after reaching $110,000 on Thursday.

Darkfost noted that the trend suggests most BTC holders remain patient on the sidelines, opting to hold instead of taking profits. However, the expert has underscored the importance of caution as a shift in sentiment is probable if BTC loses its uptrend and enters a correction phase.

BTC trading at $104,889 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com

Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.



Source link

June 13, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
James Van Straten
Crypto Trends

Semler Scientific’s (SMLR) Sharp Decline Attracts Eye of Bitcoin Bull Tom Lee

by admin June 12, 2025



The recent wave of companies adding bitcoin to their balance sheets has not yielded universally positive results. Semler Scientific (SMLR), a medical technology firm that pivoted into bitcoin treasury strategy, has seen its stock fall over nearly 50% in 2025 to nearly the level it was at a bit more than one year ago when it first began to accumulate BTC.

The company’s premium to its net asset value (NAV), often referred to as multiple-to-NAV (mNAV), has dropped below 1x. On a basic share count basis, its market cap sits at approximately $420 million compared to bitcoin holdings valued around $491 million (4,449 BTC), putting its NAV ratio at just 0.859x, according to Strategy-Tracker.

The mNAV being below 1.0 is crucial as Semler’s main mechanism for accumulating bitcoin is to raise capital via share sales. However, for the share sale strategy to be accretive to shareholders, the stock must trade at a premium to the value of the company’s bitcoin holdings. With the share price at or below NAV, issuing new shares would dilute existing shareholders without adding proportional value, effectively halting the company’s ability to pursue further bitcoin accumulation under the current strategy.

Bitcoin bull Tom Lee, Head of Research at Fundstrat, however, views Semler Scientific as an opportunity in his firm’s “Granny shot” research portfolio. Granny shot refers to an unconventional way of shooting free throws in basketball and Fundstrat’s Granny Shot (GRNY) portfolio is meant to emphasize the firm’s unusual approach to research.



Source link

June 12, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Fed Beige Book flags modest decline in activity, stable labor market
Crypto Trends

Fed Beige Book flags modest decline in activity, stable labor market

by admin June 5, 2025



In a live reaction to the Federal Reserve’s Beige Book release Wednesday afternoon, Bloomberg’s Federal Reserve and economics reporter Catarina Saraiva highlighted an increasingly cautious mood across U.S. businesses and consumers.

Saraiva stated the Federal Reserve’s Beige Book is “pretty similar” report to what we have seen this year, pointing to slight declines in activity and a labor market holding steady.

Saraiva emphasized how uncertainty, particularly tied to trade tensions and tariffs, continues to weigh on decision-making. She added that businesses and consumers “are kind of waiting to see how this tariff fight plays out.”

The Beige Book mentioned tariffs a total of 122 times, and that “economic activity declining modestly” was a recurring theme across multiple regions, she noted.

Consumer spending holds

Despite fears that tariffs would depress household spending, Saraiva said U.S. consumers have remained surprisingly resilient. The consumer, she said “has stayed strong” and a “big part of that is the labor market.” Retail sales increased slightly, but there’s been a drop in big-ticket purchases.

On inflation, Saraiva pointed to an ongoing concern at the Fed: the risk of inflation expectations becoming unanchored. “That completely takes away the Fed’s ability to control prices,” she warned. However, she noted that most market-based inflation measures remain stable, despite some recent volatility in sentiment surveys.

Michelle Bowman seen as a steady, regulation-light Fed candidate

Saraiva also discussed her recent reporting on Michelle Bowman, U.S. President Donald Trump’s pick for the Federal Reserve’s Vice Chair for Supervision. Bowman, currently a Fed governor, is known for her support of lighter-touch regulation and opposition to recent proposals for increased capital requirements.

“Her views are very widely known… she’s kind of aligned with the industry when it comes to [regulation],” Saraiva said.

She added that Bowman still advocates for rigorous supervision and has called for an independent review of the Silicon Valley Bank collapse.

Bowman could also be in the running to succeed Jerome Powell as Fed Chair, Saraiva added. She’s already on the board and has “proven herself to be a dedicated policymaker.”



Source link

June 5, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Bitcoin traders anticipate decline, watch $100K
Crypto Trends

Bitcoin traders anticipate decline, watch $100K

by admin June 3, 2025



Key takeaways:

  • Bitcoin price consolidates around $105,000 as liquidity builds up on either side of the spot price.

  • After failing to flip $106,000, BTC/USD is retracing to establish support, but $100,000 is a key level of interest for Bitcoin traders.

Bitcoin’s (BTC) price trades 6% below its all-time highs of $111,900, and traders warn the asset may see a “larger correction” in June as $100,000 becomes a key level of interest.

Bitcoin price key support remains $100K

In a repeat of the move that followed its rise above $100,000 on May 8, Bitcoin has successfully held above this level for more than three weeks.

This is the critical point on traders’ radars and one that has not received a convincing retest recently.

MN Capital founder Michael van de Poppe spotted Bitcoin hovering at $104,300 saying that after being rejected from the $106,000 level, BTC may drop lower before regaining upward momentum.

An accompanying chart showed $100,000 was the key level to watch on BTC’s four-hour timeframe. 

“Clear rejection on #Bitcoin implying that we’re going to see lower prices before we see upwards momentum.”BTC/USD four-hour chart. Michael van de Poppe

Pseudonymous analyst CrypNuevo shared a chart showing that Bitcoin failed to flip the resistance at $106,000 into support. 

“So we could likely head to $100K psychological level + 150EMA.”

Meanwhile, popular analyst AlphaBTC projected a deeper correction that could see BTC price drop as low as $90,000, if the support at $100,000 is lost.

“$BTC is likely to go sideways for some time as this larger correction plays out in the first weeks of June, waiting for more hard data and the FOMC on June 18.”BTC/USD four-hour chart. Source: AlphaBTC

As reported by Cointelegraph, BTC price action could preserve $100,000 as support based on Glassnode’s market value realized value (MVRV) bands.

Related: Bitcoin price dips under $104K as Russia-Ukraine woes rile US stocks

Liquidations waiting at $100K and below

Several traders eyed a potential downside liquidity grab with bid orders thickening below the spot price, and others clustering below $100,000.

“$100K is a strong psychological level and liquidity tends to stack in these levels,” said CrypNuevo in a separate post on X. 

The latest data from monitoring resource CoinGlass showed price eating away at bids around $105,000, with the bulk of interest clustered between the spot price and $100,000.

Bitcoin liquidation heatmap (screenshot). Source: CoinGlass

High bid orders were also building up below $100,000, with $170 million worth of liquidity sitting around $93,200.

On the upside, the $112,500-$113,500 cluster was the main liquidity area. 

“There is significant liquidity in both directions, with a more concentrated build up below the lows of the last few days,” AlphaBTC said on X.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if $BTC ran the lows and then rallied back up to take what’s left above.”

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.



Source link

June 3, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Bitcoin
Crypto Trends

Bitcoin Eyes $97,000-$99,000 As Key Support Zone If Price Decline Persists

by admin June 1, 2025


Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Bitcoin prices fell by over 3% in the past week as the broader crypto market suffers from a general price correction influenced by macroeconomic pressure. Notably, the premier cryptocurrency now trades above $104,000 representing an estimated 7% decline from its new all-time high at $111,970. Amidst what may yet be a mere correction, market analyst Daan Crypto has highlighted a support zone with strong potentials to halt any further price decline. 

$97,000-$99,000 Emerges As Key BTC Price Level

In a brief X post on May 31, Daan Crypto has shared a cautious outlook on Bitcoin amidst an ongoing price correction. The analyst notes that if the retracement persists into June, Bitcoin is likely to fall to around $97,000 -$99,000 at which it may find a credible market resistance.

Daan Crypto’s selection of this price range as the next major support level for Bitcoin stems from a confluence of technical indicators. As seen in the chart below, the $97,000-$99,000 price region represents the mid range of Bitcoin trading channel between $90,845 and $108,386, alongside hosting the 200-day moving average and the 0.382 Fibonacci retracement level.

Source: @DaanCrypto on X

The mid-range in a trading channel usually serves as a key level of support or resistance, depending on where the price is relative to it. Amidst Bitcoin’s price correction, the current mid-range at $97,000-$99,000 represents the next major price floor for the premier cryptocurrency — a decisive price fall below which would signal a bearish price trend.

Meanwhile, the 0.382 Fibonacci retracement level represents a healthy market correction zone meaning prices generally pull back to this area before resuming the initial trend. In addition, the 200 day MA is a long-term indicator averaging the market closing price over the past 200 days. It also functions as a support level during bullish trends acting as a common retest level before price continues an uptrend.

Generally, all three indicators suggest the $97,000-$99,000 would act as a sound technical support zone should Bitcoin price dip any further. However, the loss of the support zone would threaten Bitcoin’s bullish potential with the next support level set around $94,000.

Bitcoin Price Overview

At press time, Bitcoin trades at $104,650 reflecting a slight price gain of 0.14% in the past day. The premier cryptocurrency also reports a monthly gain of 7.21% indicating that the majority of new market entrants remain in profits. However, the weekly decline of 2.86% suggests there is need for a resurgence in market demand to halt a creeping bearish sentiment investment.

BTC trading at $104,632 on the daily chart | Source: BTCUSDT chart on Tradingview.com

Featured image from Pexels, chart from Tradingview

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.



Source link

June 1, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
NFT sales rebound in May 2025 after months of decline: CryptoSlam
NFT Gaming

NFT sales rebound in May 2025 after months of decline: CryptoSlam

by admin May 28, 2025



Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) caught an uptick in sales in May after months of consistent decline throughout 2025. 

Data from CryptoSlam shows that May’s NFT sales climbed to $430 million, up from $373 million in April, a 15% increase. It marks the first monthly sales increase this year, suggesting renewed interest in digital collectibles. 

This follows a five-month decline in sales since volume peaked at over $900 million in December 2024. May also had the highest number of transactions in 2025, reaching 5.5 million, according to CryptoSlam. 

The sales uptick may be attributed to the divergence between unique NFT buyers and NFT sellers. NFT buyers continued to increase in May, while sellers declined. 

Chart compiled by Cointelegraph to demonstrate CryptoSlam data on NFT monthly sales. Source: Cointelegraph

NFT sellers dwindle, while buyers increase

May showed a significant jump in unique buyers. The number of users buying NFTs rose by 50% to over 936,000 in May, up from around 622,000 in April.

May’s figures are the largest buyer count since October 2024, hinting at growing investor participation during the month. 

While buyers increased, the number of unique sellers continued to decline. In May, NFT sellers fell to around 284,600, the lowest amount recorded on the CryptoSlam platform since April 2021. 

The divergence between the growing buyer interest and shrinking seller activity could set the stage for more competitive bidding, which may lead to higher valuations. 

Chart compiled by Cointelegraph to demonstrate CryptoSlam data on NFT buyers and sellers. Source: Cointelegraph 

Related: Alchemy acquires no-code NFT launchpad HeyMint for undisclosed amount

NFTs set for a comeback in 2025

CryptoSlam strategist Yehudah Petscher said that the market is poised for a rebound, but with a more tempered outlook than its previous highs. 

“The NFT market will see a bounce back this year, probably just after BTC sees its top of the cycle,” Petscher told Cointelegraph, suggesting that the momentum in digital collectibles will follow broader crypto market trends. 

Despite the bullish sentiment, the strategist told Cointelegraph that the NFT comeback might not be similar to the space’s 2021 or 2022 peak. “Don’t expect a repeat of the 21/22 euphoria that we saw in NFTs,” Petscher said. 

Meanwhile, DappRadar analyst Sara Gherghelas said in a May 27 report that the sector needs new catalysts to fully rebound. The analyst said real-world assets (RWAs) linking with NFTs could reignite the lending sector of digital collectibles. 

RWA NFTs also showed potential earlier this year. In April, digital collections in the RWA marketplace Courtyard drove Polygon-based NFT sales to $22.3 million. This allowed the blockchain to surpass Ethereum in weekly sales.

Magazine: Pranksy: Inside the anonymous life of an NFT legend — NFT Collector



Source link

May 28, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Bitcoin
Crypto Trends

Bitcoin Long-Term Holders Supply Back On The Rise After A Brief Decline

by admin May 19, 2025


Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Positive sentiment has returned to the market as Bitcoin witnessed a surge above the $105,000 mark, a key resistance level in its ongoing upward trend. Even though BTC has briefly pulled back, many seasoned investors are exhibiting significant interest in the flagship asset, which is evidenced by a recent spike in long-term holders’ supply.

Long-Term Bitcoin holders Are Accumulating Again

Bitcoin’s renewed upward trend beyond the $100,000 milestone is being met with growing interest and confidence. On-chain expert and author Darkfost reports a notable shift in supply dynamics among long-term BTC holders, often regarded as seasoned investors.

Presently, the Bitcoin long-term holders’ supply has increased after experiencing a rare second consecutive decline, which triggered speculation about a potential distribution from these committed holders. It also raised concerns that the seasoned investors are starting to reassess their positions during the previous slight shake downs in BTC’s price last week. However, the renewed rise in long-term holders’ supply suggests a resurgence in conviction and demand among these investors as BTC surges toward key resistance levels.

BTC long-term holders go on a buying spree | Source: Darkfost on X

Following his thorough analysis of the key Bitcoin Long-Term Holder Binary Spending Indicator, the expert revealed that their supply has sharply increased from 14.3 million BTC to approximately 15.8 million BTC in the past few days.

Given the long-term holders’ underlying commitment, this rebound may support BTC’s ongoing uptrend, stabilizing and strengthening its current market cycle. If the supply continues to increase, it could provide the necessary momentum for BTC’s rally to extend since this development typically encourages higher price levels.

Two Key Points From The LTHs Supply Rise

Thus far, Darkfost has underlined two important points in the rise in LTHs supply. According to the expert, long-term holders who have accumulated BTC over time appear to be holding their coins currently rather than selling them.

Furthermore, some Bitcoin holders who purchased more coins recently, especially more than six months ago, now seem to be holding steadily. Together, these factors show a general desire to hang onto their coins throughout the long and medium terms.

With the current market performance, the expert noted that the rising supply among long-term holders without spending is a critical signal to observe. Another key observation outlined by Darkfost is that the amount of UTXOs spent by LTHs has drastically fallen since peaking in December 2024 and the brief panic in March when BTC fell below $80,000.

At the time of writing, BTC’s price was trading at $102,603, indicating a nearly 3% decrease in the past week. Despite the sudden drop to the $102,000 threshold, investors are still betting on the asset’s potential to continue rallying, as evidenced by a surge in its trading volume by over 79% in the past day.

BTC trading at $103,213 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com

Featured image from Pixabay, chart from Tradingview.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.



Source link

May 19, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (909)
  • Esports (689)
  • Game Reviews (639)
  • Game Updates (805)
  • GameFi Guides (902)
  • Gaming Gear (868)
  • NFT Gaming (885)
  • Product Reviews (858)
  • Uncategorized (1)

Recent Posts

  • Keeper Is A Salvador Dali-Inspired Surrealist Adventure With No Dialogue, No Combat, And A Walking Lighthouse
  • Shokz OpenDots One review: reliable clip-on headphones that undercut the Bose
  • Winklevoss Twins Donate $21 Million in Bitcoin to Pro-Trump, Anti-Democrat Crypto PAC
  • Bitcoin STH Capitulate: $5.69B In Losses Hit Exchanges In 48 Hours
  • Today is your last chance to grab a PS5 before Sony’s price hikes go into effect

Recent Posts

  • Keeper Is A Salvador Dali-Inspired Surrealist Adventure With No Dialogue, No Combat, And A Walking Lighthouse

    August 21, 2025
  • Shokz OpenDots One review: reliable clip-on headphones that undercut the Bose

    August 21, 2025
  • Winklevoss Twins Donate $21 Million in Bitcoin to Pro-Trump, Anti-Democrat Crypto PAC

    August 21, 2025
  • Bitcoin STH Capitulate: $5.69B In Losses Hit Exchanges In 48 Hours

    August 21, 2025
  • Today is your last chance to grab a PS5 before Sony’s price hikes go into effect

    August 21, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • Keeper Is A Salvador Dali-Inspired Surrealist Adventure With No Dialogue, No Combat, And A Walking Lighthouse

    August 21, 2025
  • Shokz OpenDots One review: reliable clip-on headphones that undercut the Bose

    August 21, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close