Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

Contract

Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin Wins Contract to Take NASA Rover to the Moon
Gaming Gear

Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin Wins Contract to Take NASA Rover to the Moon

by admin October 2, 2025


NASA’s VIPER lunar rover could be delivered to the moon by Blue Origin, Jeff Bezos’ aerospace company. The US space agency has awarded the company a task order to design a delivery plan for the rover, with a future delivery option.

The award, worth $190 million, was issued through NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program, which the agency is using to buy delivery services to the moon from private companies. The award does not directly imply a delivery agreement; first, NASA will verify whether Blue Origin is capable of successfully sending the expensive VIPER rover to the moon’s south pole. To be eligible to take on the VIPER delivery, the company must place its Blue Moon MK1 lunar lander—complete with a NASA technology payload—on the lunar surface by the end of 2025.

Blue Origin won this contract to send cargo to the moon in 2023, and designed the Blue Moon MK1 in order to fulfil it. On this mission, it will carry NASA stereo cameras that will conduct surface surveys, in addition to small spheres equipped with laser technology for mission tracking.

“There is an option on the contract to deliver and safely deploy the rover to the Moon’s surface. NASA will make the decision to exercise that option after the execution and review of the base task and of Blue Origin’s first flight of the Blue Moon MK1 lander,” the agency said in a statement.

On the same day as NASA announced the award, Blue Origin wrote on X: “Our second Blue Moon MK1 lander is already in production and well-suited to support the VIPER rover. Building on the learnings from our first MK1 lander, this mission is important for future lunar permanence and will teach us about the origin and distribution of water on the Moon.”

VIPER—which stands for Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover—has been designed by NASA scientists to explore the moon’s south pole for ice and other resources of interest. It is about 2.5 meters tall, weighs nearly 500 kilograms, and has a one-meter drill and three scientific instruments. The vehicle had been scheduled to launch in 2023, only for that date to be pushed back. Then, in the face of rising costs and further delays, in July 2024 NASA said it had cancelled the mission. The CLPS award to Blue Origin now appears to have revived the program.

The arrival of private space companies has the potential to reduce the traditional costs of space exploration while allowing mission managers to focus on scientific issues. Blue Origin, Firefly Aerospace, and SpaceX are just some of the companies that have emerged in this sector and won CLPS contracts with NASA.

“NASA is leading the world in exploring more of the Moon than ever before, and this delivery is just one of many ways we’re leveraging US industry to support a long-term American presence on the lunar surface,” said acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy in a statement. “Our rover will explore the extreme environment of the lunar South Pole, traveling to small, permanently shadowed regions to help inform future landing sites for our astronauts and better understand the Moon’s environment—important insights for sustaining humans over longer missions, as America leads our future in space.”

This story originally appeared on WIRED en Español and has been translated from Spanish.



Source link

October 2, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
UXLINK passes smart contract audit ahead of token migration
GameFi Guides

UXLINK passes smart contract audit ahead of token migration

by admin September 24, 2025



UXLINK has finalized a new smart contract audit as it prepares for a token migration following a recent exploit that allowed the hacker to mint tokens.

Summary

  • UXLINK audit confirms new fixed-supply token contract.
  • Hack on Sept. 22 drained $11.3M and minted billions in UXLINK tokens.
  • Attacker later fell victim to phishing attack, losing 542M UXLINK tokens.

UXLINK has passed a security audit for its redesigned token contract and is preparing for a migration following a multi-sig breach that drained millions and led to mass unauthorized minting.

The UXLINK (UXLINK) team posted the update on X on Sept. 24, stating that the new Ethereum (ETH) contract had passed its audit and would be deployed on the mainnet as part of an emergency token-swap plan.

The team said it has removed the mint–burn function, will keep the UXLINK ticker for continuity, and is submitting migration details to centralized exchanges. It also plans to respond to an inquiry by Korea’s Digital Asset eXchange Association today.

Security Notice – Update 5

We would like to share the latest progress on the UXLINK token migration:

1. The new UXLINK smart contract has successfully passed its security audit.
2. The contract will be deployed on the Ethereum mainnet. The contract dropped the mint-burn…

— UXLINK (@UXLINKofficial) September 24, 2025

What the audit fixes and how the migration will work

The audited contract sets a fixed supply and drops on-chain minting to prevent repeat exploits. UXLINK said cross-chain interoperability will rely on partner services rather than a native mint function.

The migration plan is meant to realign supply with the project’s whitepaper and to restore confidence after the compromise. Centralized exchanges have been briefed and most have pledged support or temporary suspensions while the swap is coordinated.

More on UXLINK exploit

On Sept. 22 attackers used a “delegateCall” vulnerability to seize admin rights over UXLINK’s multi-signature wallet. That allowed transfers of roughly $11.3 million in assets, including stablecoins, ETH, and WBTC, and enabled the attacker to mint between 1 and 2 billion UXLINK tokens on Arbitrum.

About 490 million of those tokens were dumped on decentralized exchanges, bridged to Ethereum, and swapped for roughly 6,732 ETH, according to chain analysis. The minting and sell-off pushed UXLINK down more than 70%, from about $0.30 to roughly $0.09.

Security firms and exchanges moved quickly. PeckShield joined the probe, and major CEXs including Upbit froze suspect deposits, limiting further laundering. Law enforcement has been notified and recovery procedures are active.

UXLINK attacker falls victim to phishing scam

In an unexpected twist, the attacker was later phished. ScamSniffer and on-chain investigators flagged a subsequent approval-based drain that moved roughly 542 million UXLINK to phishing wallets tied to the Inferno Drainer network. One large transfer totaled 433,583,532 UXLINK.

That siphon reduced the exploiter’s usable holdings, though the attacker still realized substantial proceeds.

UXLINK says frozen addresses are under recovery procedures and that community losses will be handled with transparency and compensation. The audited contract and migration are the next steps in that effort. The team urged users to follow only official channels for migration instructions.





Source link

September 24, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
MSP Miner launches new cloud mining contract for XRP holders
NFT Gaming

MSP Miner launches new cloud mining contract for XRP holders

by admin September 23, 2025



Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

MSP Miner offers XRP-based cloud mining with massive payouts, enabling users to earn up passive income from crypto holdings.

Summary

  • MSP Miner lets XRP holders earn up to $5,000/day via cloud mining with no hardware or setup needed.
  • Backed by clean energy, MSP Miner offers secure crypto income across major coin options.
  • As markets shift, MSP Miner helps investors turn XRP into sustainable passive income efficiently.

The Federal Reserve’s announcement of a 0.25 percentage point interest rate cut triggered a global rebound in risk assets. XRP attracted over $3 billion in inflows, sending its price soaring.

This has come at a time when more and more investors are choosing MSP Miner to earn controllable and stable returns through cloud mining. Users simply hold XRP and activate a contract; there’s no need to purchase equipment or perform any complex operations. The system automatically settles profits daily, allowing investors to earn up to $5,000 per day, ensuring a stable cash flow.

Since registering in the UK in 2018, MSP Miner has established hundreds of clean energy mining farms worldwide and supports payments in a variety of major cryptocurrencies, including BTC, XRP, DOGE, and ETH. With transparent returns and secure funds, users can easily participate in mining and earn a stable passive income.

MSP Miner getting started guide

1. Visit MSP Miner, create an account and automatically receive a $15 bonus.

2. Choose a mining contract that suits a particuowr budget and contract length.

3. Start Mining – profits will be paid daily.

Mining profits are settled daily, and principal is fully repaid at contract maturity.

Visit the official website to learn more about the potential returns of MSP Miner contracts.

Key advantages of MSP Miner include:

Renewable Energy: MSP Miner uses 100% clean energy (solar, wind, and hydropower). This effectively reduces CO2 emissions, lowers the high energy consumption of traditional mining, and ensures stable computing power 24/7.

Supports deposits and withdrawals for multiple cryptocurrencies: BTC, ETH, DOGE, SOL, XRP, USDC, LTC, USDT, and more.

The intuitive user interface is suitable for both novice and experienced miners.

Through the affiliate program, users can earn referral rewards of up to 3% + 2% and bonuses of up to $50,000.

Compliant and Transparent: Safe and transparent, with public information on mining farms and energy consumption; suitable for medium- to long-term investors seeking stable growth and low risk.

Conclusion

The Federal Reserve’s interest rate cuts highlight growing interest in alternative investments, while Ripple’s rapid rise underscores the increasing convergence of traditional and digital financial markets. For investors, this moment represents not only short-term gains but also a long-term shift in how capital seeks growth opportunities. With MSP Miner’s cloud computing contracts, XRP holders can now transform their assets into sustainable passive income in a transparent, efficient, and affordable manner.

For more information, visit the official website.

Official email: [email protected]

Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.



Source link

September 23, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
(https://www.usdhtracker.xyz/)
NFT Gaming

Native Markets Leads Early Voting for Hyperliquid’s USDH Stablecoin Contract

by admin September 11, 2025



Good Morning, Asia. Here’s what’s making news in the markets:

Welcome to Asia Morning Briefing, a daily summary of top stories during U.S. hours and an overview of market moves and analysis. For a detailed overview of U.S. markets, see CoinDesk’s Crypto Daybook Americas.

The first signs of how validators are leaning in Hyperliquid’s hotly contested stablecoin vote are in, and the Stripe-aligned Native Markets team has an early lead.

(https://www.usdhtracker.xyz/)

As of Thursday morning Hong Kong time, Native Markets has secured 30.8% of the delegated stake, led by heavyweight validators infinitefield.xyz (13.5%) and Alphaticks (5.2%).

Paxos Labs, the New York–regulated issuer behind PayPal’s PYUSD, sits at 7.6% with backing from B-Harvest and HyBridge. Ethena has picked up 4.5%, while Agora, Frax, and Sky, despite splashy proposals, have yet to attract meaningful support, though many of the most prominent validators have yet to cast their virtual vote.

The bigger picture: more than half of stake, 57%, remains unassigned.

That block includes some of the most influential validators on Hyperliquid, such as Nansen x HypurrCollective (the single largest validator with over 18%) and Galaxy Digital. Where they ultimately land will decide whether Native Markets’ early momentum carries through to the September 14 deadline.

Native Markets is pitching a Hyperliquid-native stablecoin issued via Stripe’s Bridge infrastructure, promising yield-sharing to the Assistance Fund and HYPE buybacks.

But prominent voices, including Agora CEO Nick van Eck, warn that Stripe’s simultaneous push to launch its Tempo blockchain and its control of wallet provider Privy could create conflicts.

Despite those criticisms, some validators appear to view Stripe’s global payment rails as a compelling advantage.

What’s at stake is far more than just another token launch. Hyperliquid currently holds $5.5 billion in USDC deposits, around 7.5% of the stablecoin’s supply.

Replacing that with USDH would redirect hundreds of millions in annual Treasury yield. Paxos has pledged 95% of reserve earnings to HYPE buybacks, Frax promised 100% of yield directly to users, Agora offered 100% of net yield alongside institutional custodianship, and Sky (ex-MakerDAO) proposed 4.85% returns plus a $25 million “Hyperliquid Star” project to bootstrap DeFi on the chain.

Hyperliquid already commands nearly 80% of decentralized perpetuals trading. Whichever issuer wins the USDH contract won’t just be minting a stablecoin, they’ll be wiring themselves into the financial backbone of one of crypto’s fastest-growing exchanges.

Market Movement:

BTC: Currently trading at $114,053, up 2.6% in the past 24 hours and 2.1% over the past week, though still down 3.9% for the month. The move reflects a short-term rebound fueled by positive risk sentiment and steady demand, even as longer-term consolidation continues.

ETH: ETH is trading at $4,373.99, up 2%, as investors shrug off a mass-slashing event that penalized over 30 validators.

Gold: Gold held near $3,635 an ounce after Tuesday’s $3,674 peak as investors await U.S. inflation data that could shape Fed cuts, while ANZ raised its year-end gold target to $3,800 and sees a peak near $4,000 by June on strong investment demand and central-bank buying.

Nikkei 225: Asia-Pacific markets opened mixed Thursday, with Japan’s Nikkei 225 up 0.23% and the Topix down 0.18%, after Wall Street hit record highs on Fed rate-cut hopes and upbeat inflation data.

S&P 500: The S&P 500 rose 0.3% to a record 6,532.04 Wednesday after an unexpected drop in wholesale prices bolstered hopes for a Fed rate cut next week.

Elsewhere in Crypto:

  • Trump’s CFTC Hopeful Quintenz Takes His Dispute With Tyler Winklevoss (Very) Public (CoinDesk)
  • Polygon rolls out hard fork to address finality bug causing transaction delays (The Block)
  • Activist investor Elliott Management says crypto is facing an ’inevitable collapse’ after its ‘perceived proximity to the White House’ inflated a bubble (Fortune)



Source link

September 11, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Dynamic Duo Zuckerberg and Palmer Luckey Reunite for Army Combat Goggles Contract
Product Reviews

Dynamic Duo Zuckerberg and Palmer Luckey Reunite for Army Combat Goggles Contract

by admin September 8, 2025


Despite spending billions of dollars to make it happen, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Oculus founder Palmer Luckey were never able to make virtual reality a profitable consumer product. Teamed up again, the pair have found an audience that is more comfortable with spending lots of money for slow development timelines and little return: the US Army. According to a report from Bloomberg, Luckey’s Anduril Industries and Zuck’s Meta Platforms were among three companies tapped to produce prototypes for mixed-reality style combat goggles.

The project—which also invited a company called Rivet Industries that is headed up by the former Head of Mixed Reality at Palantir to participate, in case you were worried they couldn’t assemble the full Axis of Evil for this thing—will seek to build upon the Army’s massive, multi-billion dollar Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) project that it launched with Microsoft. The goal is to ultimately create “new helmet-mounted mixed reality systems.”

The IVAS project will certainly be familiar to Luckey’s crew at Anduril, which took over the project after Microsoft effectively abandoned its VR/AR ambitions entirely—but not before handing over a demo product that an Army participant said “would have gotten us killed.” Just what they have done with it since taking over isn’t clear, though the project did get re-named to “Soldier Borne Mission Command” (SBMC), so that’s something.

There does seem to be quite a bit of information that will help inform the new goggles project. Anduril claimed that it will be guided by “over 260,000 hours of soldier feedback from the IVAS program,” which comes after the Army poured $1.36 billion into research, development, prototypes, according to Bloomberg. Seems like a lot of that information will be on what *not* to do, but that’s a start.

The project also appears as though it’ll make good on Zuckerberg and Luckey’s promised return to collaboration after a nasty falling out in 2017. Earlier this year, the two Trumped-up tech bros promised to make “the world’s best” AR and VR technology for the U.S. military under what they called “Project EagleEye.” The expectation was that the pair would make a joint bid for an Army contract that would be worth about $100 million. While the details on this latest deal weren’t made public by Anduril, the company did announce that Meta was a part of its bid and would be involved in the development of the goggles. Rival Rivet Industries said its contract was valued at around $195 million, per Bloomberg. So, it seems we may have a match.



Source link

September 8, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Decrypt Courses Complete
Crypto Trends

What is Ethereum (ETH)? A Beginner’s Guide to the Smart Contract Blockchain

by admin September 5, 2025



In brief

  • Ethereum transformed the blockchain industry by enabling smart contracts, DAOs, NFTs, and decentralized apps.
  • From its 2015 launch to The Merge in 2022, Ethereum has driven innovation and faced growing pains.
  • Ethereum powers DeFi and NFTs, but still battles high fees, scalability limits, and fierce competition.

Ethereum, the second-biggest cryptocurrency after Bitcoin, is a blockchain-powered platform for creating decentralized applications (dapps).

Ethereum is not just a cryptocurrency. It’s a global, decentralized network that enables smart contracts—self-executing programs on the blockchain—and decentralized applications, or dapps, that run without banks, governments, or big tech.

When programmer Vitalik Buterin published a “whitepaper” in late 2013 proposing a new kind of blockchain—not just for money but for programmable code—a revolution in digital finance began. Today, the Ethereum blockchain hosts decentralized applications like smart contracts, games, digital art, and assets worth billions.

Ultimately, many believe that Ethereum could underpin a re-imagining of how the internet works, dubbed Web3, in which control of the internet is disintermediated away from big companies such as Amazon, Google, Facebook, and X.

This guide will help you understand the history of Ethereum, Buterin’s big idea, and the role Ether plays in that vision.

Smart contracts: Ethereum’s breakthrough

The feature that set Ethereum apart from Bitcoin early on was the smart contract. A smart contract is a code stored and executed on the blockchain that runs automatically once its conditions are met.

Smart contracts are transparent, tamper-proof, and execute without relying on third parties. This makes them the backbone of everything built on Ethereum, from DeFi protocols to NFT marketplaces.

Who Invented Ethereum?

Russian/Canadian computer programmer Vitalik Buterin wrote the whitepaper that Ethereum is based on. However, the building of the network and community was helped along by a number of co-founders: Anthony Di Loria, Charles Hoskinson, Miha Alisie, Amir Chetrit, Joseph Lubin and Gavin Wood.

Development of the Ethereum network began in early 2014 under the Ethereum Foundation, with Gavin Wood publishing the technical “yellow paper” that defined the Ethereum Virtual Machine.

A crowdfunded token sale followed in mid-2014, raising funds through an initial coin offering, or ICO, that exchanged Bitcoin for Ether. The ICO raised over $18 million.

The network officially went live on July 30, 2015, launching as “Frontier”—a platform for developers to test and deploy decentralized applications.

The switch from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake

When it first launched, Ethereum used the same Proof-of-Work consensus mechanism as Bitcoin, with cryptocurrency miners securing the network by solving complex cryptographic puzzles.

In September 2022, Ethereum switchted to a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus algorithm. Instead of mining, Ether is created through staking: validators lock up at least 32 ETH as collateral and are chosen to propose and verify new blocks. Honest participation earns them ETH rewards.

This shift, known as “The Merge,” ended Proof-of-Work mining, making Ethereum more energy-efficient while allowing anyone with the required stake to help secure the network and earn rewards.

Blocks are still added about every 12 seconds, but ETH is now distributed as staking rewards, not mining rewards.

Did you know?

Ether (ETH), Ethereum’s native cryptocurrency, pays for transactions, powers apps, and secures the network. Ether’s sub-units, Gwei and Wei, are named after Wei Dai, an early pioneer of cryptocurrencies.

What applications have been built on Ethereum?

  • 👥 Social Networks: Get paid for your posts on social media dapps.
  • 📁 File Storage: Decentralized file storage at a fraction of the price.
  • 💸 Overseas Payments: Dramatically reducing the cost of sending cash overseas.
  • 💳 Payment Cards: Contactless debit card to pay in Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies.
  • 👀 Online advertising: Cutting out the middlemen in online ads. Users get paid directly for watching online advertisements.
  • 💱 Exchanges: Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) such as Uniswap enable users to trade cryptocurrencies peer-to-peer, without middlemen.
  • 🏦 Loans: Blockchain-backed loans with no credit checks.

Timeline: Major milestones in Ethereum

  • Late 2013: Vitalik Buterin publishes the Ethereum white paper, introducing the idea of a programmable blockchain.
  • Mid-2014: Ethereum crowdsale (ICO) sells Ether for Bitcoin to fund development.
  • July 30, 2015: Ethereum launches with the “Frontier” genesis block.
  • September 2015: “Frontier Thawing” update increases gas limits for more stability.
  • March 2016: Homestead upgrade improves protocol security and usability.
  • April 2016: The DAO, a decentralized venture fund, launches via crowdsale.
  • June 2016: Hackers exploit The DAO and drain roughly $50 million in Ether. Community votes to hard-fork, creating Ethereum (ETH) and Ethereum Classic (ETC).
  • October 2017: Byzantium hard fork enhances performance, privacy, and sets the stage for Proof-of-Stake.
  • December 2017: CryptoKitties and CryptoPunk NFTs go viral, stressing network capacity and highlighting scalability issues.
  • January 2018: ERC-721 NFT standard is introduced, enabling unique digital assets.
  • December 2020: Beacon Chain launches, beginning Ethereum’s transition to Proof-of-Stake.
  • March 2020: Visa begins settling USD Coin (USDC) stablecoin transactions using Ethereum.
  • April 2021: Berlin hard fork reduces gas costs.
  • August 2021: London hard fork activates EIP-1559; introduces fee burning, reducing inflation.
  • September 15, 2022: “The Merge” transitions Ethereum from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake, cutting energy use by more than 99 percent.
  • April 12, 2023: The Shanghai upgrade enables withdrawal of staked Ether from the Beacon Chain.
  • March 13, 2024: The Dencun upgrade introduces proto-danksharding, a step toward reducing costs and increasing scalability.
  • May 7, 2025: The Pectra upgrade, combining Prague and Electra updates, aims to expand staking flexibility and improve Ethereum’s efficiency.

Ethereum and DAOs

One of Ethereum’s most radical innovations was the decentralized autonomous organization, or DAO. A DAO is a blockchain-based organization governed by smart contracts and community votes. Members typically hold tokens that grant them voting power on how the DAO operates and spends its funds.

The first major experiment was The DAO in 2016, which sought to operate as a decentralized venture capital fund. Investors pooled Ether, then voted collectively on how to allocate it. The project ended in disaster due to an infamous hack, but it demonstrated the potential of blockchains as platforms for decentralized governance.

Since then, DAOs have grown into a vibrant sector. They range from DAO frameworks like Moloch and Aragon, to investment collectives like Syndicate, and governance DAOs such as MakerDAO, which manages a stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar, to social DAOs that organize communities online.

Supporters argue that DAOs could redefine corporate governance by replacing traditional hierarchies with code and community control. Critics warn that legal frameworks remain murky, and smart contract vulnerabilities pose risks. Still, DAOs remain one of the clearest examples of Ethereum enabling something that could not exist without it.

A network tested by crisis

If Bitcoin is the gold of the cryptocurrency world, Ethereum is the oil that machines are powered on—but it has not been all smooth sailing.

Ethereum’s first major crisis arrived in 2016 with the DAO hack, when attackers exploited a vulnerability to steal $50 million worth of Ether.

The community was split: some argued the blockchain’s ledger should remain immutable, while others pushed to undo the damage. The decision to hard fork created two parallel blockchains—Ethereum (ETH) and Ethereum Classic (ETC).

Ethereum and the NFT boom

Ethereum also fueled the explosion of non-fungible tokens, or NFTs, unique digital assets that prove ownership of items like art, music, or collectibles.

The breakthrough came in 2017 with the ERC-721 token standard, which let developers create unique tokens on the Ethereum blockchain.  NFTs began to clog the Ethereum network as users spent millions trading CryptoKitties, CryptoPunks, and more, showing both the appeal and the limits of the technology.

By 2021, NFTs had gone mainstream. Digital artist Beeple sold an NFT artwork for $69 million, and the Bored Ape Yacht Club launched. One of the most prominent NFT collections, the Bored Ape Yacht Club, is a collection of 10,000 primate-themed NFTs that became a cultural phenomenon, drawing celebrities and selling for hundreds of thousands of dollars each. At its height, in May 2022, all 10,000 BAYC NFTs collectively were valued over $1 billion.

Ethereum’s smart contracts made this possible by encoding ownership and authenticity directly into the blockchain. The NFT boom exposed Ethereum’s energy inefficiency, accelerating its shift away from the more energy-intensive Proof-of-Work algorithm.

The race to scale

Ethereum’s biggest weakness? Scalability. At about 15 transactions per second, it cannot match Visa’s tens of thousands. That bottleneck has often caused sky-high “gas fees,” or transaction costs.

To address this, developers began a years-long upgrade known as Ethereum 2.0. The launch of the Beacon Chain in 2020, the Berlin and London upgrades in 2021, and the Merge in 2022 marked steps toward a more efficient, Proof-of-Stake network. Later upgrades, including Shanghai in 2023 and Dencun in 2024, tackled staking flexibility and lower transaction costs.

Ethereum and the Web3 vision

Supporters see Ethereum as the foundation for “Web3”—an internet where users, not corporations, control data, money, and digital identities. Ethereum powers decentralized finance DeFi, non-fungible tokens, and decentralized autonomous organizations, each of which experiments with alternatives to traditional financial and governance systems.

But competition looms. Rival networks such as Solana, Cardano, and Polkadot have positioned themselves as faster, cheaper alternatives. Meanwhile, Ethereum scaling solutions like Polygon and Arbitrum aim to process transactions off-chain before anchoring them to Ethereum’s main blockchain, reducing lag time and cost.

A decade in, Ethereum is still defining itself

As Ethereum enters its second decade, it continues to test the boundaries of what a blockchain can do. Whether it will deliver on its vision of a decentralized internet—or cede ground to faster competitors—remains an open question.

What’s certain is that Ethereum has already changed how we think about the internet, money, community, and governance.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

September 5, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
US Congressman’s Brother Lands No-Bid Contract to Train DHS Snipers
Gaming Gear

US Congressman’s Brother Lands No-Bid Contract to Train DHS Snipers

by admin September 4, 2025


The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) this month quietly awarded a $30,000 no-bid contract for sniper and combat training to a Virginia firm run by Dan LaLota, the brother of US representative Nick LaLota, a second-term Republican from New York.

Finalized on September 2, the award went to Target Down Group of Mechanicsville, Virginia, which will provide a five-day precision fires and observation course for the Homeland Security Investigations’ Special Response Team (SRT) sniper program. The course, intended to help inform new DHS procedures, is “aimed at equipping them with the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively conduct law enforcement sniper operations in high-risk environments,” per records reviewed by WIRED.

The SRT functions as the agency’s version of a SWAT team, composed of special agents with advanced tactical training for situations deemed too dangerous for standard personnel. SRT members wear military-style camouflage and helmets, carry a range of weapons, and train in breaching, sniper tactics, and close-quarters combat.

According to federal procurement records, the SRT contract was issued on a sole-source basis, with officials citing Target Down Group’s prior work with Homeland Security Investigations as well as its pre-clearance to conduct live-fire exercises at a law enforcement facility in Arizona.

Congressman LaLota, who served on the House Homeland Security Committee in the previous session, could not be reached for comment. Calls to his New York and Washington, DC, offices went unanswered Thursday.

DHS did not respond to a request for comment.

Reached by phone, Dan LaLota said his firm’s deal with ICE has nothing to do with his brother’s position in Congress. “I’m not a new guy on the block,” he tells WIRED, adding there’s only a few people qualified to provide the training DHS requested. “To say my company would be the only one eligible would not be unsound.”

LaLota added he could not speak on ICE’s behalf and declined to discuss details of his company’s work, calling the questions an invasion of privacy while directing reporters to his firm’s website for information about its staff and expertise.

Target Down Group’s website lists Dan LaLota, a retired Marine sniper, as the company’s president. According to his brother’s congressional biography, Dan LaLota served two decades in the Marine Corps, including tours with Force Reconnaissance and Marine Special Operations Command, earning a Bronze Star with Valor for actions in Fallujah, Iraq. LaLota told WIRED he also has seven years as a scout sniper instructor.

Federal procurement records list Target Down Group as a Virginia company; however, state records show the firm is not legally authorized to operate as a Virginia corporation at this time, having been terminated in November 2024 automatically after failing to meet its yearly filing and fee requirements with the state’s corporate registry. Nevertheless, the company was registered separately in Florida as of July. (Asked about the discrepancy, Target Down Group CEO Christopher Allison acknowledged the inquiry but did not provide comment.)

Federal acquisition rules allow sole-source contracts under certain conditions, effectively bypassing the competitive bidding process often required for federal awards. In a redacted justification memo, DHS said Target Down Group was the only vendor able to deliver the training, citing a tight operational schedule as well as the firm’s prior work with its sniper program and established ties to Arizona police, some of whom are participating in the exercise.

Dan LaLota declined to discuss any previous work for the government. “I’m not at liberty to discuss what business I have with a stranger like yourself. I hope you can understand that,” he said.

In June, NBC News reported that SRT units were preparing to deploy to several Democratic-led cities, including Philadelphia, Chicago, Seattle, Northern Virginia, and New York. The planned deployments followed immigration raids in Los Angeles that sparked days of protests and clashes with law enforcement. Philadelphia officials told NBC they had received no notice of incoming ICE forces.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly defended sending federal law enforcement and National Guard troops into Democratic-led cities by claiming they are plagued by “runaway crime,” a description critics call exaggerated and politically driven. In cities such as Chicago, Baltimore, and New Orleans, local and state officials have resisted the deployments, arguing they are motivated by politics, not public safety.



Source link

September 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
A contract, designer wardrobe and UFC win: Inside Baisangur Susurkaev's best week
Esports

A contract, designer wardrobe and UFC win: Inside Baisangur Susurkaev’s best week

by admin August 29, 2025


  • Brett OkamotoAug 27, 2025, 08:00 AM ET

    Close

      Brett Okamoto has reported on mixed martial arts and boxing at ESPN since 2010. He has covered all of the biggest events in combat sports during that time, including in-depth interviews and features with names such as Dana White, Khabib Nurmagomedov, Conor McGregor, Nate Diaz, Floyd Mayweather, Manny Pacquiao and Georges St-Pierre. He was also a producer on the 30 for 30 film: “Chuck and Tito,” which looked back at the careers and rivalry of Chuck Liddell and Tito Ortiz. He lives in Las Vegas, and is an avid, below-average golfer in his spare time.

The only time Baisangur Susurkaev didn’t have a smile on his face two weeks ago was for a few moments on a Tuesday night in Las Vegas — when his team tried to tell him he wasn’t allowed to eat a steak.

Susurkaev had just scored a first-round knockout on “Dana White’s Contender Series” and earned a UFC contract. Naturally, he was in the mood to celebrate, so he went straight from the UFC Apex to Herbs & Rye steakhouse. But when the waiter came to take Susurkaev’s order, his team reminded him the UFC was working furiously to book him a fight at UFC 319 in Chicago on Saturday — four days later.

“I told him he should probably order salmon,” Susurkaev’s manager, Jamie Gall, told ESPN this week. “If the UFC did get him a fight, he would have to make weight on Friday. He looked so sad that I told the waiter, ‘OK, give him a steak, but no salt, no butter, don’t even use oil. Just cooked meat.'”

But Gall still felt bad. The 24-year-old from Chechnya in Russia, who had been working as a food delivery driver less than a month before, had just achieved his dream of signing with the UFC, and all he wanted was a proper steak.

Editor’s Picks

2 Related

Gall phoned her business partner, Dave Martin, who had been in contact with the UFC all night about a potential opening on the UFC 319 card, and asked for an update. The UFC hadn’t responded to his recent messages, Martin told Gall, and it was getting late.

“Let him eat,” Martin conceded.

Gall found the waiter and ordered it all — the butter, the salt. Throw in an order of fries.

But when the team returned to the Palace Station hotel after the meal, Martin called back. The UFC had a fight for Susurkaev in Chicago.

On the morning of Tuesday, Aug. 12, Susurkaev was a struggling fighter from Chechnya living and training in South Florida who had only fought twice in the past three years. Four days later, he walked to the Octagon in front of a sold-out United Center crowd and submitted his opponent in the second round to become the first person to win a “Contender Series” bout and a UFC debut in the same week. “I haven’t been this excited about a guy in a very long time,” UFC CEO Dana White declared after Susurkaev’s “DWCS” win.

Susurkaev’s run will go down as one of the single greatest weeks in UFC history. Here are the behind-the-scenes details that show how Susurkaev came to this moment, and contextualize how impressive it is.

Tuesday, Aug. 5

Susurkaev has nearly given up on MMA multiple times over the past two years.

He took a risk and moved to the U.S. from Chechnya in 2023, after several of his MMA sponsors dropped out of the business because of economic changes resulting from the Russia-Ukraine War.

“When the war started, there was less money being invested into fighters,” Susurkaev told ESPN. “So, for me it was, ‘Am I going to stay and find work or am I going to try?’ It was my best friend who told me I had to do it. After hearing his words, I knew I had to try.”

Tamerlan Susurkaev, middle, moved to the United States from Chechnya to train with and coach his younger brother, Baisangur, right. At left is Khamzat Chimaev. MAG Agency

Susurkaev and his older brother, Tamerlan, a former professional fighter, traveled to the U.S. and started training at Kill Cliff MMA. Tamerlan initially wasn’t supposed to go to the U.S. but decided he had to be in his brother’s corner as his coach, just as he had been in Chechnya.

When the two had enough money, they lived in a hotel across the street from the gym in Deerfield Beach, Florida. When money ran short, they slept in a car in the hotel parking lot or on one of the lounge chairs next to the hotel’s pool.

Susurkaev’s talent was immediately apparent. Kill Cliff is home to some of the best fighters in the world, including former champions Kamaru Usman, Robbie Lawler and Rashad Evans, and Susurkaev blended in just fine on the mats. There were times he would spar with another middleweight at Kill Cliff, return to his hotel, play the UFC video game and recognize the face of a fighter he had just rolled with.

“I don’t watch fights,” Susurkaev said. “So we would go to choose our players [in the video game] and I would say, ‘Who is this? I sparred with him today. Who is this guy?'”

The issue he ran into was a lack of fights. Gall and her partners at MAG Agency struggled to find him opportunities. Between 2024 and the first half of 2025, Susurkaev only fought twice — at Las Vegas promotion Borroka’s inaugural event and Fury FC.

Susurkaev came close to abandoning his dream again because of the lack of work, even packing his bags to leave on several occasions. His team saw it weighing on him.

“He was great in the gym, but you could tell he was struggling in life,” Lawler told ESPN. “He wouldn’t be at practice. I would ask where he was, and you could just tell stuff was weighing on him. I didn’t ask him personally because I didn’t have that relationship with him, but he was never getting fights and I’m sure that wasn’t easy on him.”

His management team had tried and failed to secure him a spot on this year’s season of “Dana White’s Contender Series” until the UFC reached out on Aug. 5 to ask if Susurkaev was available to fill in for a middleweight who had pulled out of an Aug. 12 matchup. The timing was perfect. Susurkaev had just spent the past month in California as a main sparring partner for UFC star and fellow Chechen Khamzat Chimaev, so he was in fighting shape.

Tuesday, Aug. 12

The first week of Season 9 of “DWCS” will go down as one of the worst episodes in the series’ history. The UFC fielded five fights and awarded only two contracts, the fewest of any episode in more than three years.

The bright spot was Susurkaev, who scored a walk-off, front-kick knockout three minutes into the first round.

“My guy,” White said to Susurkaev, as he announced Susurkaev’s contract at the end of the show. “You are an absolute killer. I love everything about you. We’re going to be seeing you [in the UFC] very soon.”

As White spoke, Susurkaev held up four fingers on his right hand, signaling four days until the UFC pay-per-view event in Chicago. He had told Gall before the Tuesday event that he planned to earn a contract and fight on the same card as Chimaev, who was challenging Dricus Du Plessis for the middleweight championship in the main event. He was so adamant about fighting on the card that he refused to sign a Nevada State Athletic Commission document that restricts training and competing for a minimum of seven days after a sanctioned event to medically recover. Eventually, he did sign, and the suspension was waived.

Susurkaev was already scheduled to be in Chicago to cheer on Chimaev, well before any of this. He met Chimaev in Chechnya in 2022 and shared the training room with him that year. They stayed in touch, and when Chimaev decided to hold the final month of his UFC 319 camp in Huntington Beach, California, he invited Susurkaev to join him.

“He is a big motivation for me and everyone in Chechnya,” Susurkaev said. “In Russia, if you fight for the UFC, you’re a superstar. And he has reached an unbelievable level. I saw this with him, and it became my dream.”

The UFC informed Susurkaev that it had booked him a UFC fight the same night he knocked out Murtaza Talha in the first round with a kick to the liver. He verbally agreed to make his UFC debut four days later against an opponent to be determined. He didn’t find out he would be up against fellow newcomer Eric Nolan until Wednesday morning, on his flight to Chicago.

Wednesday, Aug. 13

Susurkaev reunited with his sparring partner, Chimaev, at the UFC 319 fighter hotel in Chicago, where the two Chechens found themselves at the center of attention.

“It was very strange for me,” Susurkaev admitted. “There were cameras every minute, you know? I was ready for everything when it came to fighting, but not being famous. In the hotel, guys wanted pictures with me. It was big, big attention.”

Chimaev invited Susurkaev to his room that evening to offer his congratulations — and his credit card. The UFC had added Susurkaev to its news conference lineup the following day, and Chimaev wanted him to look good.

“He said, ‘Go to the store, and buy everything you want,'” Susurkaev said.

Baisangur Susurkaev wore all new threads and a designer watch for the pre-UFC 319 news conference, courtesy of Khamzat Chimaev. Mike Roach/Zuffa LLC

By the end of the night, Susurkaev had a new $8,000 wardrobe. Chimaev even loaned him a designer watch, as a finishing touch to the news conference ensemble.

“All my life, I’ve never had more than $100, $200 of clothes,” Susurkaev said. “I felt like I was rich walking out with those clothes.”

Saturday, Aug. 16

Despite the indulgent meal on Tuesday night, Susurkaev made weight on Friday morning, and his first walk to the UFC Octagon on Saturday night played out like one extended celebration. He smiled all the way from the tunnel to the Octagon — and continued to smile once the fight started. It was impossible to miss his older brother, Tamerlan, by his side for the walk-in, because he was literally leaping into the air.

Khamzat Chimaev, left, and Baisangur Susurkaev, right, both of Chechnya, sparred together in the lead-up to UFC 319 in Chicago, where Susurkaev won his UFC debut fight and Chimaev won the middleweight championship. Courtesy of MAG Agency

“I couldn’t believe it,” Tamerlan said. “I couldn’t believe that it was real. It felt like we were living in a PlayStation game. It was too much. I couldn’t even take it all in.”

Susurkaev submitted Nolan in the second round to earn the first submission victory of his career. His postfight interview in the Octagon with Joe Rogan aired live on ESPN and has been viewed more than 100,000 times on YouTube. Later that evening, Chimaev dominated Du Plessis to become a UFC champion. It’s hard to say there will ever be a bigger evening for Chechen MMA.

“In my village, it was crazy, crazy,” Susurkaev said. “Like we had won a war or something like this. So many people, meeting in fields, watching in big rooms. It’s a good time for all of us in Chechnya.”

The early parallels between Chimaev and Susurkaev are impossible to ignore. Chimaev made his UFC debut in 2020 on Fight Island in Abu Dhabi and won White over by asking to fight twice in 10 days. Susurkaev one-upped him by doing the same in four days.

If you visit Susurkaev’s Instagram page, his bio now reads, “DANA’s favourite fighter,” and includes his record, 10-0. He changed the record before making his walk at UFC 319 because he was so certain he would win. Talent and belief have never been a problem for Susurkaev. And now, after one of the greatest weeks in UFC history, opportunity shouldn’t be either.



Source link

August 29, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Kumaijl Nanjiani's Marvel Contract Had Clause For Video Game That's Probably Not Coming Out
Game Updates

Kumaijl Nanjiani’s Marvel Contract Had Clause For Video Game That’s Probably Not Coming Out

by admin August 26, 2025



In 2021, Marvel Studios attempted to expand the reach of the MCU with an adaptation of Eternals, a lesser-known group of immortal heroes. Kumail Nanjiani was cast as Kingo alongside Angelina Jolie, Gemma Chan, Salma Hayek, Barry Keoghan, and more. Eternals didn’t earn enough to merit a sequel, and Nanjiani has revealed that he had a deal for a video game and a theme park attraction that never came to pass.

“I signed on for six movies, you know,” said Nanjiani during his appearance on Mike Birbiglia’s Working It Out podcast. “I signed on for a video game. I signed on for a theme park ride. They make you sign up for all this stuff … And so you’re like, ‘Oh, this is the next 10 years of my life, so I’ll be doing Marvel movies every year, and then in-between I’ll do like my own little things, whatever I want to do.’ And then none of that happened.”

That deal appears to have been predicated on Eternals being a hit like Guardians of the Galaxy before it, which did get licensed out for video games and theme park rides. Marvel hasn’t had a lot of video games based directly on the MCU movies in the last two decades, but the studio apparently kept the possibility open for Eternals.

Nanjiani previously disclosed that he went to therapy after Eternals was greeted with bad reviews, but he told Birbiglia that the experience taught him that too much of his self esteem was tied up to other people’s reactions to his work.

Eternals had $402.1 million worldwide, which is a threshold that Marvel Studios has had trouble reaching this year. Regardless, the only Marvel movie to pick up on some of the threads introduced in Eternals was Captain America: Brave New World.

Nanjiani also noted that he’s proud of Eternals, and his experience with it has given him material for his latest standup comedy set.



Source link

August 26, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Trey Hendrickson-Bengals contract dispute: What's next?
Esports

Trey Hendrickson-Bengals contract dispute: What’s next?

by admin August 25, 2025


  • Ben SolakAug 25, 2025, 06:15 AM ET

    Close

      Ben Solak joined ESPN in 2024 as a national NFL analyst. He previously covered the NFL at The Ringer, Bleeding Green Nation and The Draft Network.

In a not-so-distant future, sportswriters around the country might be tasked with writing a quick summary on the Bengals’ trade of star edge rusher Trey Hendrickson. To help them with that mad scramble, I have written two ledes (that are free to copy, word for word). Here is the first:

After consecutive seasons missing the playoffs, the Bengals continue reloading their roster, trading away a 30-year-old pass rusher after a peak season.

And here is the second:

Despite contending aspirations, the Bengals refuse their sack leader’s contract request, weakening their struggling defense via a last-minute trade.

Are either of these good ledes? No. But both could stand atop a quick summary of a potential Hendrickson trade and hold equal truth, depending on the spin the author wants to give.

There’s no end in sight for the contract dispute between the 30-year-old Hendrickson and the Bengals, which is sparking more trade rumblings. It has gone on for so long and taken so many turns that it bears recalling how it came to this point, explaining why both sides are right(ish) and trying to figure out what will happen next.

Jump to a section:
How much has actually changed?
How big could a Hendrickson extension be?
How much trouble is this defense in?
Which teams could trade for him?
What’s the most likely outcome now?

How did we get here?

This Hendrickson contract dispute really started two years ago. At the time, he was halfway through a four-year, $60 million deal he had signed as a free agent in 2021.

When Hendrickson signed that deal, he was coming off his first year as a starter for the Saints, racking up 13.5 sacks in 15 games. The Bengals rewarded him with a long contract, but in typical Bengals fashion, it came with minimal guarantees. Only $16 million of his $60 million contract was guaranteed at signing. Compare that to the other edge rushers who signed deals in that 2021 offseason: Carl Lawson, who Hendrickson replaced in Cincinnati, was given a three-year deal worth $45 million by the Jets, of which $30 million was guaranteed; Shaquil Barrett got a four-year, $68 million deal from the Buccaneers with $34.5 million guaranteed; and Bud Dupree left the Steelers for the Titans and signed a five-year, $82.5 million contract with $35 million guaranteed. This was the going rate for a 26- to 28-year-old second contract edge rusher at the time.

These deals are significant not just for the difference in guarantees, but what happened next: Hendrickson outperformed them all. Dupree struggled in Tennessee and was released after two seasons. Barrett was an All-Pro in the first season of his extension, but regressed thereafter, only making one Pro Bowl in the next five seasons. Lawson ruptured an Achilles tendon before ever taking a snap in a Jets uniform and never returned to form.

Meanwhile, Hendrickson made four straight Pro Bowls. He missed three games in four seasons, recording 57 sacks over 65 games — just three behind Myles Garrett and 1.5 behind T.J. Watt over that stretch. As his contemporaries from the 2021 free agent class faded, other star rushers got extensions, and the edge market exploded.

Editor’s Picks

2 Related

The next offseason, Haason Reddick, Harold Landry III and Maxx Crosby all got bigger deals — 32-year-olds Von Miller and Chandler Jones, too. In the spring of 2023, Rashan Gary and Montez Sweat signed deals worth over $24 million per year, while Nick Bosa reset the market with a deal worth over $34 million annually.

By the summer of 2023, Hendrickson was one of the most underpaid edge rushers on the market, and he set out to address that. He and the Bengals reached terms on a one-year extension that bumped up his APY, added $21 million in new money and guaranteed some of that money in the form of an $8 million roster bonus. That additional year is the 2025 season, but Hendrickson has said he will not play out the deal.

Structurally, this additional year is quite team-friendly (the final years of long extensions often are). In exchange for giving Hendrickson the raise he sought in 2023, as well as some guaranteed money, the Bengals secured an additional year of team control. He hits the cap for only $18.6 million this season — 10th among edge rushers. None of his base salary — $15.8 million — is guaranteed, either. That means he will only be paid by the Bengals for games he plays for the club this season — significant in the event of a midseason trade and remarkable in the event of an in-season holdout. For every week of the 18-week season Hendrickson misses, he’ll be fined 1/18th of that $15.8 million salary — $877,777.

Hendrickson is in a similar position to 2023. At that point, he had accumulated 22 sacks in 31 games with consecutive Pro Bowl appearances. This time, he has 35 sacks in 34 games (which leads the league), has added a first-team All-Pro nod to his résumé and once again dramatically outperformed his contract value. If the Bengals were willing to play ball with him then, why aren’t they now?

That question is why Cincinnati isn’t playing ball. Hendrickson already came to the team once, while under a contract that he signed, and asked for a new deal to reflect his level of play. The organization gave him that raise in exchange for an additional year of team control. Now that the Bengals are finally getting that additional year, Hendrickson wants to rip things up again? When he’s two years older? And when there’s almost no shot he outperforms his contract a third time? He would have to be setting single-season sack records to do so.

When Hendrickson signed that 2023 extension, he got more money upfront on a deal that was light on guarantees. In doing so, he gave the Bengals that additional year of team control, opting to hit the market in 2025 instead of 2024. Had he gotten banged up in the 2023 season, or if his play had fallen off, the extra financial security would have been huge. Instead, he excelled in 2023 and 2024, ascending into the upper echelon of edge rushers — and now that free agent delay is hurting his earning potential.

Has anything changed to accelerate a trade?

That’s how we got here in a general sense: unhappy Hendrickson, obstinate Bengals. How did we get here specifically? After months and months of negotiating, have the Bengals finally reached the end of their rope? Will Hendrickson be traded soon?

Probably not.

The Bengals and Hendrickson have gotten closer on an extension over the past few months. In June, ESPN’s Adam Schefter reported that the two sides still disagreed on value and length in their contract talks. One month later, Schefter said: “The deal is in place, but there is a disagreement on the guaranteed money in the deal.”

During the Bengals’ preseason game against the Commanders last week, ESPN’s Laura Rutledge spoke to Hendrickson and reported that the two sides agree on contract length and total value, yet remain far apart on guarantees. This is not unsurprising since Cincinnati is notoriously reluctant to include guaranteed money beyond the first year of any contract extension, only making recent exceptions for Joe Burrow, Ja’Marr Chase and (to a degree) Tee Higgins.

Your League, Your Rules

Create a league and customize league size, scoring and rules to play in the league you want to play in.

Create a league today!

Still, movement on length and total value implies some degree of positive momentum. Despite the reports the two parties might be close to an agreement, why are there suddenly rumors about a trade?

The first is as a negotiating tactic. Hendrickson is staring down big fines while his teammates finish their preseason and prepare for Week 1. If his resolve is beginning to crack, maybe some rumblings that he could become a Carolina Panther will spur him to give a little ground on those guaranteed numbers.

As Burrow pointed out, the Bengals recently signed extensions in the past couple of weeks before the season: His megadeal was signed on Sept. 7, 2023; running back Joe Mixon signed his extension on Sept. 2, 2020; and wide receiver A.J. Green signed his on Sept. 11, 2015. Defensive linemen Geno Atkins and Carlos Dunlap were signed on the same day — Aug. 29, 2018. At the time, Atkins’ $16.3 million APY was the biggest number for a non-quarterback over 30 years old.

If the Bengals believe Hendrickson’s deal is close and needs a little extra push, perhaps they’re using the trade rumors as a final tactic of leverage. That, to me, feels like the more likely explanation.

But it is also possible negotiations have been so stagnant for so long that the Bengals are finally taking a serious look at options: They might actually trade Hendrickson. Reportedly, their asking price is steep (which is why I believe the first explanation more than this one). Any team acquiring Hendrickson will then have to pay him the contract he seeks, and in that it is a very large contract, trading the pick(s) and spending the money makes the pill a little too big to swallow.

How big could a Hendrickson extension be?

Extending Hendrickson should be a preposterously easy exercise for the Bengals and a team possibly acquiring him. There has been so much recent activity in the edge rusher market that a clear contract range exists for a player of his age and production.

At the top end, there is Browns edge rusher Myles Garrett. Garrett, who is less than a year younger than Hendrickson, signed a four-year, $160 million deal ($40 million per year) in March. Over the past three seasons, Garrett and Hendrickson have had the same number of sacks (47) in the same number of games played (49). Garrett gets more attention from opposing offenses and is significantly better on run downs (Hendrickson’s 17% run stop win rate ranks 459th out of 463 qualifying defensive linemen, linebackers and safeties over the past three years), but he can argue to be in Garrett’s neighborhood as a pass rusher.

Hendrickson vs. Myles Garrett: 2022-24

PlayerGamesSacksSack
ratePressure
ratePass rush
win rateDouble team
rateRun Stop
Win RateRun stop%Hendrickson49433.6%13.7%23.0%19.4%17%2.7%Garrett49443.4%12.7%26.0%31.3%28%4.2%

Just below Garrett on the edge rusher rankings is the Texans’ Danielle Hunter, who signed a one-year extension in March worth $35.6 million onto his existing deal — a little like the Hendrickson 2023 extension, except most of the money is guaranteed. Hunter is more comparable to Hendrickson in run defense but has been a cut below as a pass rusher over the past three seasons.

Hendrickson vs. Danielle Hunter: 2022-24

PlayerGamesSacksSack
ratePressure
ratePass rush
win rateDouble team
rateRun stop
win rateRun stop%Hendrickson49433.6%13.7%23.0%19.4%17%2.7%Hunter51392.6%9.8%17.0%19.6%23%2.4%

Fold in a few other recent edge rusher extensions if you like. Hendrickson’s camp would rightfully argue that T.J. Watt, who is older than Hendrickson, just got $41 million per year from the Steelers despite being demonstrably less productive as a pass rusher. But remember: Chasing the bigger APY figure is what led to issues for Hendrickson. In that he’s desperate to get some guaranteed money while he’s still highly productive in his early 30s, signing him to a deal below $40 million per year but with guarantees through the first and into the second year feels feasible for the Bengals. For another team, guarantees could stretch well into Year 3.

It’s those pesky guarantees that are the hang-up. Hunter has $54.1 million guaranteed over the two seasons of his deal in what is nearly a fully guaranteed pact. Maxx Crosby signed a three-year extension with $91.5 million guaranteed with the Raiders — $62.5 million of which is in the first two years. Don’t even look at Watt and Garrett, who had $108 million and $123.6 million guaranteed in their respective extensions.

If the Bengals are trying to meet Hendrickson somewhere in the middle and give him guarantees over the first two years of an extension, they will be lucky to get him between Hunter’s and Crosby’s numbers of $54.1 million and $62.5 million. Any figure in that range will dwarf the two-year guarantees given to any Bengal not named Chase or Burrow. Only $30 million in guarantees were given to Higgins on his four-year, $115 million extension ($40.9 million, if you want to include a roster bonus that triggers next season).

If the Bengals are offering Hendrickson guarantees in Year 2, they’re likely trying to use a similar structure to the Higgins deal — all of the real guarantees in Year 1 and then a Year 2 salary that guarantees shortly after the 2026 league year begins. By doing this, Cincinnati functionally creates more team option years (like Hendrickson’s current 2025 contract) at the end of the deal — years full of fat salaries but no guaranteed money that make players easily cuttable. Will Hendrickson take a deal that includes those years? Short of signing a Hunter-esque, fully guaranteed one-year extension, it’s something he’ll likely have to endure.

As I said above, this should be painfully easy. The same realities of the quarterback and wide receiver market that forced the Bengals to break their typical contract guardrails for Burrow and Chase are present in the edge rusher market. Top pass rushers get paid like top receivers in terms of yearly contract size and functional guarantees. While it was a little easier to see Chase’s megadeal occurring than it was to see Hendrickson’s, who has unlocked a new level of play in his late 20s, this is an excellent problem to have. Sure, signing 30-year-olds to big guarantees comes with more risk, but every team does it — it’s an inescapable reality of the NFL.

If an elite player at a premium position wants to sign a contract with you, do it.

What could the Bengals defense look like without Hendrickson?

Cincinnati isn’t sure if it can financially endure Hendrickson’s demands — but can it endure his absence on the field? Forget about his elite play. He was one of a precious few good players for its defense last season. Of course, his 17.5 sacks and 65 pressures can only do so much. Despite his All-Pro efforts, the Bengals ranked 27th by defensive EPA per play and 29th by success rate. Only the Jaguars and Panthers gave up a new set of downs more frequently.

On the one hand, it feels like trading Hendrickson wouldn’t matter too much. He was elite last season, and the Bengals were really bad on defense. Their particular struggle was in run defense. By success rate, this was one of the 20 worst run defenses of the past 15 years; it was average against dropbacks. As mentioned above, he is a low-impact run defender. He makes some plays as a penetration disruptor, but his win rate against run blocking is well below the league average, and that shows up on the film — his effort wanes, he doesn’t shed contact well and he struggles against double teams.

But imagine a Bengals defense that cannot stop the run at all, and then on that rare first-and-10 when they get a stop … they don’t have their ringer pass rusher to actually get off the field. Similarly, Hendrickson’s willingness to sell out for early-down pass rushes (at the expense of run defense) helped them keep the opposing offense behind the sticks. Of his 17.5 sacks last season, 13.5 came on first and second down, which is tied for the most early-down sacks in a season this decade. The Bengals needed splashy negative plays to find flashes of viability as a defense, and Hendrickson hunted for those.

Trey Hendrickson is holding in to try to get an extension from the Bengals. His contract is set to expire after the 2025 season. Photo by Ian Johnson/Icon Sportswire

Consider a Hendrickson holdout that makes it to Week 1, when Cincinnati travels to Cleveland. The Bengals’ brass likely feels justified in its approach to his contract negotiation thus far. But the team’s young defense, even under a new defensive coordinator this season, suffers the same run issues. The Browns then lean on them on the ground. On those precious few early-down dropbacks they force, they can’t get quick pressure or a drive-ending sack. Week 2 comes against Jacksonville — who, like the Browns, aren’t considered a top offense. But the same thing happens. No Hendrickson escape button to get the two or three stops the Bengals offense needs to win shootouts.

Suddenly, Hendrickson has a lot more leverage at the negotiating table, even as he incurs his holdout fines. Because the Bengals have gotten a taste of what defense looks like without him on the field, and it’s painfully obvious, their only path to a Super Bowl involved a heroic Hendrickson effort. And they need him to get on the field now in order to be ready to deliver that in January.

Other outcomes are possible. The defense holds its own for the first few weeks — maybe the run defense even improves without him on the field — and the call for him to sign never gets unbearably loud. The extension gets done and we never see the Bengals defense without him. Or perhaps Hendrickson gets traded, and their defense is reimagined around another player altogether.

It’s difficult to imagine any player returning in a trade and dramatically overhauling this defense. Perhaps in-season we’ll be pleasantly surprised by the linebackers, defensive line and safeties — but a glaring need at corner will demand filling. Still, trading Hendrickson is defensible because of one of those headlines I wrote above: That a team that has missed the postseason twice, in large part because of an underwhelming defense, is trading an outstanding performer it doesn’t want to pay and who evidently cannot single-handedly save its defense anyway.

Which team could trade for Hendrickson at this point?

If Hendrickson gets dealt, measuring his trade package against potential deals from earlier this spring will be fascinating. I immediately recall when the Panthers sent edge rusher Brian Burns to the Giants for a second- and fifth-round pick in March 2024, not 18 months after declining two firsts and a second at the 2022 trade deadline. When the rest of the league knows you’re painted into a trade corner, the offers drop in value fast. I wonder what trade offers long past come out of the woodwork, if and when Hendrickson gets dealt over the next few weeks.

Offers were always going to be better in February and March than they are in September and October. Teams have more money at the beginning of the league year, before they’ve signed any free agents; they have more draft picks, too, before the draft hits. With that said, big late-summer trades are not unprecedented.

Breaking News from Adam Schefter

Download the ESPN app and enable Adam Schefter’s news alerts to receive push notifications for the latest updates first. Opt in by tapping the alerts bell in the top right corner. For more information, click here.

A few examples jump to mind: One of the biggest in recent memory was the Khalil Mack trade, which happened on Sep. 1, 2018. He held out of the preseason for a new deal from the Raiders, but they flipped him to the Bears (and a second-round pick) for two firsts. Mack then signed a six-year, $141 million extension — at that point the biggest deal for a defensive player in NFL history. Mack had an even stronger résumé then than Hendrickson does now — two All-Pro seasons, including a Defensive Player of the Year award — and he was only 27.

The Mack trade is perhaps the most forgivable of all late-summer expenditures of big draft capital — it went pretty well for the Bears. The other ones aren’t so excusable.

On Aug. 31, 2019, the Dolphins traded offensive tackle Laremy Tunsil (who also had one year remaining on his contract) and some change for two first-round picks and a second. Tunsil was 25 at the time, but it’s worth noting the Dolphins got a young tackle (Julien Davenport) in the deal, much as the Bengals are looking to get a young replacement back in their trade. Of course, after sending such value to secure him, the Texans were in a poor negotiating position. Tunsil played out the final year of his deal, then was signed to a three-year, $66 million contract that was the highest offensive line APY at the time. This trade was universally panned as bad business by the Texans at the time, and despite the fact that Tunsil was a pretty good left tackle for them, the juice was not worth the squeeze.

On July 25, 2020, the Jets traded safety Jamal Adams to the Seattle Seahawks for two future first-round selections. Like Tunsil and Mack, Adams was young (24 years old) and approaching the end of his deal (he had two seasons remaining). Like Tunsil and Mack, the Seahawks had to give Adams the extension he sought: a four-year, $72 million deal that topped the safety market following the 2020 season. That trade was really, really bad for the Seahawks — Adams struggled to stay healthy and make impactful plays even when he was on the field.

Hendrickson’s age complicates things significantly. ESPN’s Bill Barnwell pointed out that the last non-quarterback over 30 years old to return a first-round pick in a trade was Chris Doleman in 1994 — a much different time.

Perhaps the best analogy for Hendrickson is Richard Seymour, who was traded on Sept. 6, 2009, from the Patriots to the Raiders — a month before his 30th birthday. Seymour was entering the final year of his deal with the Patriots and coming off one of his best seasons (8 sacks, 11 TFLs, 17 QB hits). He was traded for a 2011 first-round pick — two drafts in the future — and without an extension in place, which led to a long and painful contract dispute. Much like the Tunsil deal, the Seymour trade was not considered shrewd business at the time for the Raiders, nor does it look much better in hindsight.

All of ESPN. All in one place.

Watch your favorite events in the newly enhanced ESPN App. Learn more about what plan is right for you. Sign Up Now

As such, it’s impossible to say which team will trade for Hendrickson because it doesn’t make sense. At cost, it is a universally bad idea. Sending a first-round pick for a non-quarterback over 30 is bad business. Making a big trade right before the season implies a frantic plugging of a short-term gap, which is rarely a good approach, either. It is financially achievable for almost all teams, depending on the sort of contracts they offload in the trade process — and for some, it is financially prudent. The Patriots and Titans have plenty of money and not much young ascending talent they’re preparing to pay. The Chargers and Seahawks have the room and the playoff aspirations, too. It might not be a good idea on paper, but it’s not impossible — similar trades have happened before. It only takes one team.

Should the Bengals become interested in, say, a second-round pick and cornerback Cam Hart in an offer from the Chargers, or a second-round pick and edge rusher Derick Hall from the Seahawks, then it becomes much more likely. But I don’t think they will, nor am I sure those other teams will offer those packages — not with the season around the corner and plenty of other possibilities to spend their future money on.

So what will happen next?

My prediction: The Bengals will announce a three-year extension with Hendrickson worth $38 million per year with over $60 million in new guarantees on Sept. 3.



Source link

August 25, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (1,098)
  • Esports (800)
  • Game Reviews (732)
  • Game Updates (906)
  • GameFi Guides (1,058)
  • Gaming Gear (960)
  • NFT Gaming (1,079)
  • Product Reviews (960)

Recent Posts

  • AirPods 4 Are Now 3x Cheaper Than AirPods Pro, Amazon Is Offering Entry-Level Clearance Prices
  • Wildgate Review – A Shipshape Space Race
  • Battlefield 6 physical copies are content complete and require no initial install, according to early copy holders
  • KPop Demon Hunters Uploaded A New Song, But Something’s Off
  • One of Borderlands’ most hated characters seems to have been cut from Borderlands 4

Recent Posts

  • AirPods 4 Are Now 3x Cheaper Than AirPods Pro, Amazon Is Offering Entry-Level Clearance Prices

    October 8, 2025
  • Wildgate Review – A Shipshape Space Race

    October 8, 2025
  • Battlefield 6 physical copies are content complete and require no initial install, according to early copy holders

    October 8, 2025
  • KPop Demon Hunters Uploaded A New Song, But Something’s Off

    October 8, 2025
  • One of Borderlands’ most hated characters seems to have been cut from Borderlands 4

    October 7, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • AirPods 4 Are Now 3x Cheaper Than AirPods Pro, Amazon Is Offering Entry-Level Clearance Prices

    October 8, 2025
  • Wildgate Review – A Shipshape Space Race

    October 8, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close