Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

Comeback

Decrypt logo
GameFi Guides

Moonbirds Token BIRB to Take Flight on Solana as NFT Comeback Continues

by admin October 2, 2025



In brief

  • Ethereum NFT project Moonbirds revealed plans to launch a Solana token, BIRB.
  • The IP has seen a resurgence of activity and interest after being acquired by Orange Cap Games earlier this year.
  • The original Moonbirds NFTs have surged in price in recent months, and again on Thursday.

Recently resurgent Ethereum NFT project Moonbirds has unveiled its next major step: the launch of BIRB, an ecosystem token set to debut on Solana.

The plans were announced at the Moonbirds Birbhalla side event alongside Token 2049 in Singapore, where O.G. supporters and new holders gathered. A teaser post on X suggests the token will launch “soon(ish).”

The pixelated owl collection has been through multiple hands of ownership since launching in 2022. Originally created by Kevin Rose’s Proof Collective in 2022, the collection soared at launch, generating $280 million worth of trading volume in just two days—but crashed due to community backlash as broader NFT hype collapsed.

Yuga Labs, the parent company of the Bored Ape Yacht Club, acquired Proof and the Moonbirds brand in February 2024, but left the IP largely dormant. Renewed optimism followed this May when Orange Cap Games—a gaming and IP development studio led by Spencer Gordon-Sand—acquired the collection.

The acquisition and new updates appear designed to inject new life into the project, especially by tying it into Solana’s popular meme coin ecosystem.

The move reflects a broader trend of so-called “culture coins,” or tokens issued by major NFT communities over the past several months to deepen engagement and unlock new utility. Some collections that peaked during the 2021-22 NFT bull run and were later dismissed have managed to revive interest through token launches. 

From PENGU tied to Pudgy Penguins, ANIME from Azuki, DOOD from Doodles, to MOG and MILADY tied to internet-native meme movements, culture coins have become a way for communities to both gamify participation and create liquid, tradable extensions of their brand identity. 

Market reaction to the Moonbirds announcement has so far been positive. Secondary market NFT sales spiked after news broke, pushing the collection’s floor price up to 4 ETH, and currently 3.45 ETH at the time of writing—about $15,450 worth.

The NFTs were trading for less than $1,000 worth of ETH earlier this year, before the Orange Cap acquisition. Moonbirds NFTs peaked at a floor price—that is, the cheapest listed asset on a marketplace—of almost $86,000 worth of ETH back in 2022 after the initial mint.

Traders appear to be betting that BIRB, if designed with clear utility, could cement Moonbirds’ relevance following the recent resurgence. In terms of long-term plans for the token, nothing has been announced, but Gordon-Sand cryptically wrote on X, “Timing is everything.”

In a previous interview with Decrypt, he said, “We have a lot of cool stuff we are working on, but we have [never] made specific commitments about it in public, and that’s very much on purpose.”

Even so, don’t expect a surprise token drop—the official Moonbirds account on X noted that there will be “ample time given in the lead up to the launch with more details communicated ahead of time.”

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

October 2, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Crypto Market Prediction: Shiba Inu (SHIB) in Free Fall to Add Zero, Ethereum (ETH) Secures $4,000, Bitcoin (BTC): $110,000 Comeback Attempt
GameFi Guides

Crypto Market Prediction: Shiba Inu (SHIB) in Free Fall to Add Zero, Ethereum (ETH) Secures $4,000, Bitcoin (BTC): $110,000 Comeback Attempt

by admin September 29, 2025


The price performance of Ethereum, Shiba Inu and Bitcoin is somewhat similar as all those assets are trying to recover and reach price levels that will make them stand out. Unfortunately, those recoveries are almost completely baseless and unlikely to yield strong movements toward local highs.

Shiba Inu not stabilizing?

The price of Shiba Inu has dropped to $0.00001105 and is not showing any signs of stabilizing, marking yet another period of intense pressure. There are no obvious support areas left to stop the decline after the token broke below its multi-month symmetrical triangle structure. Without volume, momentum, or any discernible buy-side strength, SHIB appears on the verge of dropping its price by another zero.

SHIB has lost important moving averages on the technical front, such as the 200-day EMA ($0.0000135) and the 50-day EMA ($0.0000125). The breakdown below these levels emphasizes the dominance of sellers and validates the exhaustion of bullish attempts. A clear rejection from descending resistance is followed by a steady decline with no indication of a demand spike, as the chart depicts.

SHIB/USDT Chart by TradingView

Trends in volume support this pessimistic view. Comparing trading activity to previous accumulation phases, it has collapsed, indicating a sharp decline in investor interest in SHIB. Since there are fewer bids to absorb sell orders, downside moves typically accelerate in low-volume settings. Another level of concern is added by momentum indicators. The RSI is slightly above oversold territory at 37, indicating weak momentum.

Relief rallies may normally be possible during oversold conditions, but in SHIB’s case, any bounce is unlikely to last due to the absence of accompanying volume. SHIB is basically in free fall because there isn’t any strong support. The $0.00001000 level is the next round-number zone. This psychological level may encourage speculative buying, but if it is broken below, SHIB’s price could drop to a new zero and possibly into the $0.00000900 range.

Ethereum takes it back

Ethereum has successfully recovered the $4,000 mark, which has now turned into a battleground for bulls and bears. ETH recovered from the 100-day EMA at $3,800 after a steep decline from highs close to $4,800, regaining significant ground and indicating that buyers are not yet prepared to relinquish control. Ethereum is currently trading just above $4,000 on the daily chart, but the recovery is not strong.

ETH/USDT Chart by TradingView

At 37, a surge of sell pressure caused the RSI to approach oversold territory, providing technical traders with a point of entry for a recovery. Volume data indicates that although buying interest has increased, it is still not robust enough to ensure long-term momentum. Since it serves as a mid-range pivot between the $3,800 support and the $4,300 resistance, as well as a psychological threshold, the $4,000 level is crucial.

The 50-day EMA and the descending resistance trendline converge at $4,280 and $4,300, which are the next targets if ETH can maintain above this level. If there is a breakout above this area, the path may reopen to $4,600 and ultimately retest the cycle highs around $4,800. Still, there is a significant chance of losing $4,000. An additional retest of $3,800, the final solid support before a possible decline toward the 200 EMA around $3,400, would be exposed if ETH were to close below this level on a daily basis.

In summary, while ETH has gained $4,000, the fight is far from over. To keep the recovery going, the bulls must firmly defend this level, any weakness could make the current rebound into just another relief rally inside a larger correction.

Bitcoin pushback

Talk of a possible push back toward $110,000 has been sparked by Bitcoin’s apparent bounce around $109,000. This comeback attempt, however, seems to be more of a transient response than a firm reversal, because it seems brittle and lacks structural support. Recently, Bitcoin fell below the 50-day EMA ($113,700) and the 100-day EMA ($112,200) on the daily chart, indicating short-term weakness. At $106,200, the price is currently just above the 200-day EMA, which is still the last significant safety net for bulls.

Although the 200 EMA has historically served as a long-term support, the current bounce did not come from it; rather, BTC is merely attempting to regain ground following several days of aggressive selling. This is what gives the recovery attempt the appearance of being unfounded. The current upswing lacks volume and conviction, in contrast to recoveries from oversold extremes or strong support zones. The lack of trading activity indicates that buyers are reluctant to intervene forcefully.

Near 38, the RSI is almost oversold, but not quite low enough to indicate exhaustion. This creates space for additional declines in the event that bearish sentiment returns. Bitcoin must recover the $112,000-$114,000 range, where the broken moving averages are currently acting as resistance, in order to confirm the $110,000 comeback. The market would only be able to view this rebound as more than a brief break in the downward trend at that point. Any short-term gains run the risk of being unwound quickly until that time.

To put it briefly, Bitcoin is making an effort to recover toward $110,000, but the move appears uncertain in the absence of a solid base or robust buyer support. The real test is yet to come: either regain momentum and overcome resistance, or run the risk of another retest of the $106,000 level, where the 200 EMA is waiting as the last line of defense.



Source link

September 29, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Changpeng Zhao discloses BNB treasury plans amid Binance comeback talks
NFT Gaming

Changpeng Zhao discloses BNB treasury plans amid Binance comeback talks

by admin September 17, 2025



Changpeng Zhao has revealed bold treasury plans to grow the BNB ecosystem as speculation of his return to Binance comeback gains momentum.

Summary

  • BNB treasury plans gain traction as CZ outlines support for growing institutional interest.
  • Speculation grows over CZ’s return to Binance after he changed his X profile back to “@binance” amid reports the DOJ may lift compliance restrictions.
  • BNB price hits all-time high of $962, with analysts predicting a surge past $1,000 amid renewed investor interest.

Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) has revealed ambitious plans to reshape the BNB ecosystem through the upcoming BNB Treasury Company. The disclosure came during a recent interview with Leon Lu, founder of B Strategy, where the former Binance CEO talked about the future of BNB, its ecosystem, and strategic plans aimed at driving long-term growth.

Describing BNB (BNB) as a “true utility coin,” CZ emphasized its unique position in the crypto space. “Very few coins have these types of benefits,” he said, referencing BNB’s multi-chain compatibility and its use across trading discounts, yield generation, launch pools, launchpads, and the Binance Alpha ecosystem. 

According to CZ, BNB’s importance spans both centralized and decentralized platforms, with active use in cross-border payments and dApps worldwide. He also spotlighted strong network effects and untapped potential in regions such as Southeast Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. He stated that this “undeveloped potential” is a competitive advantage, suggesting that the BNB ecosystem still has substantial room to grow.

The discussion builds on B Strategy’s plan to launch a U.S.-listed treasury company focused on BNB, targeting a $1 billion raise with backing from YZi Labs. CZ highlighted growing institutional demand for the asset, noting that support will be offered only to strong, well-positioned projects.

“We’ve been approached by probably more than 50 companies for BNB specifically,” stated the founder, adding that, “While we cannot not support anybody who wants to buy BNB…we will only do that to a very small number of DAT companies. Basically, the very top, strong ones.”

Alongside these BNB treasury revelations, speculation about CZ’s return to Binance has also taken center stage. 

Is CZ coming back to Binance?

The rumors were sparked when CZ quietly changed his X bio on Sept 17, from “ex-@binance” back to simply “@binance.” The subtle change comes nearly two years after CZ stepped down as CEO following a $4.3 billion settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice in Nov 2023.

At the time, he pleaded guilty to violating U.S. anti-money laundering laws and was fined $50 million. The terms of the settlement also barred him from managing or operating Binance, with Richard Teng stepping in as the new CEO.

Now, reports allege that the DOJ is close to lifting the compliance oversight placed on Binance, a move that would remove one of the final legal barriers potentially preventing CZ’s return. However, CZ has previously denied any intentions to return as CEO again, saying he has no wish to return to the company even if allowed.

Still, the timing and subtle hints have sparked fresh speculation. Meanwhile, BNB price itself has been in an uptrend, recently soaring to a new all-time high of $962, defying broader market consolidation. 

BNB treasury buzz fuel rally, price eyes $1,000 milestone

Per crypto.news data, the Binance Coin price is up 2.7% on the 24-hour chart, trading around $956 at press time. It has also increased by 8.2% and 13.7% on the week and month respectively, signaling high bullish activity partly fueled by the ongoing treasury buzz.

The altcoin has been enjoying a massive interest from institutional investors. Alongside the upcoming BNB Treasury Company, several other firms like Nano Labs have unveiled Windtree Therapeutics their various long-term bet on the asset, adding weight to the bullish momentum.

Meanwhile, the Binance Coin price has entered a bullish continuation, forming a clear uptrend with consistent volume increases. The MACD remains strongly bullish, with the MACD line above the signal line and widening, suggesting ongoing upward momentum. The RSI is at 70.82, which is entering overbought territory, signaling a possible short-term pullback or consolidation.

BNB Price chart | Source: crypto.news

Should the treasury plans continue, BNB may be positioned for further gains. Immediate resistance lies at $980, and a breakout above this could open the door to retesting the $1,000 psychological level. Strong support can be seen around $920, with deeper support near $880 if a correction occurs.



Source link

September 17, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Crypto
Crypto Trends

Crypto Funds See $3.3 Billion Comeback, Bitcoin And Ethereum Lead Rebound

by admin September 16, 2025


Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Last week was a good week for digital asset investment products, which attracted a collective $3.3 billion in inflows, according to the latest weekly report from CoinShares. The latest inflow numbers pushed assets under management (AuM) back to $239 billion, just shy of August’s all-time high of $244 billion. The rebound in inflows, which came after shedding $352 million the previous week, was due to softer-than-expected US macroeconomic data and strong end-of-week price gains across the crypto market.

Bitcoin And Ethereum Lead The Turnaround

Unsurprisingly, Bitcoin recorded the strongest shift in sentiment. Particularly, investment products based on the leading cryptocurrency witnessed $2.4 billion in inflows, its largest weekly total since July. The prevailing bullish sentiment throughout the week meant that short-Bitcoin products saw modest outflows that pushed their AuM to just $86 million. 

Ethereum also swung back into positive territory after eight consecutive trading days of outflows. It registered $646 million in inflows, buoyed by four straight daily sessions of positive investor sentiment. This was a quick turnaround from the $912 million in outflows the previous week.

Source: Chart from CoinShares

Other assets also benefited, with Solana-based products achieving their largest-ever single-day inflow of $145 million on Friday and ending the week at a $198 million inflow total. XRP-based products added $32.49 million, while SUI, Cardano, and Chainlink products saw inflows of $13.96 million, $1.04 million, and $1.54 million, respectively. The recovery across multiple altcoins is a noteworthy improvement in institutional confidence compared to earlier weeks of downward pressure.

Regional Trends Show US Dominance

The flows into digital asset funds were overwhelmingly concentrated in the United States, which saw $3.2 billion in inflows. Most of these were into Spot Bitcoin and Spot Ethereum ETFs, which witnessed $2.34 billion and $637.69 million inflows last week, according to data from SoSoValue.

Digital asset funds based in Germany followed with $160 million and capped the week with their second-largest daily inflow on record. However, Switzerland-based products stood out on the downside and registered $92 million in outflows that partially offset Europe’s gains.

Looking at providers, iShares ETFs in the US attracted $1.1 billion in new funds, Fidelity’s Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund added $850 million, and Bitwise and ARK 21Shares ETFs combined for over $360 million. Meanwhile, Grayscale drew in nearly $147 million, though it is still on net outflows year-to-date.

The recovery in fund flows has lifted overall AuM for digital asset investment products to $239 billion, just 2% below August’s all-time high of $244 billion. Continued inflow this week could see the overall AuM hitting a new all-time high this week.

Bitcoin is dominating the AuM ranks with $182 billion, which is a 76.15% stake. Ethereum, on the other hand, accounts for $40 billion. The third highest AuM is Solana with $4.1 billion. Although it is far behind, Solana has witnessed impressive AuM growth this year.

Overall crypto market at $3.96 trillion | Source: TOTAL on Tradingview.com

Featured image from Pixabay, chart from Tradingview.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.



Source link

September 16, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
NFL Week 2: Wild comeback wins for Cowboys, Colts, Bengals
Esports

NFL Week 2: Wild comeback wins for Cowboys, Colts, Bengals

by admin September 16, 2025


  • Bill BarnwellSep 15, 2025, 08:45 AM ET

    Close

      Bill Barnwell is a senior NFL writer for ESPN.com. He analyzes football on and off the field like no one else on the planet, writing about in-season X’s and O’s, offseason transactions and so much more.

      He is the host of the Bill Barnwell Show podcast, with episodes released weekly. Barnwell joined ESPN in 2011 as a staff writer at Grantland.

You certainly can’t say it was a boring Sunday. While there were a few blowout victories here and there, we saw seven of the 12 games Sunday decided by seven points or fewer. Outside of the 49ers, who firmly shut the door on the Saints to seal up their second consecutive close victory on the road to start the season, none of those wins felt resounding.

Three teams pulled off comebacks by scoring in the final two minutes of regulation or overtime. The Cowboys topped the Giants, the Bengals beat the Jaguars and the Colts pulled out a last-second victory over the Broncos.

I’m going to break down those three games. What happened? How did those teams fuel their comebacks? Are these types of performances sustainable? And should we feel concerned about the three losers of those games?

Subscribe: ‘The Bill Barnwell Show’

Let’s begin in Dallas, where the Cowboys needed help from one of the superstars it still has to overcome the absence of the one it traded away. (And if you want to read more about the Giants’ side of things, come back Thursday, when I’ll have my annual look at the league’s 0-2 teams and how they’re essentially all about to suit up for playoff games in Week 3. It’ll be the Chiefs’ first appearance in that column, too.)

Jump to a game:
Giants-Cowboys | Broncos-Colts
Jaguars-Bengals

Demoted to the 1 p.m. ET window after seemingly decades of being a nationally televised game between two of the league’s most storied franchises, the Cowboys and Giants responded with their own version of last week’s Ravens-Bills game. After a Dak Prescott interception started the second half and the Giants responded by stalling out in the red zone and turning the ball over on downs, these two teams scored on nine of the remaining 10 possessions in regulation. The lead changed hands six times in the process before the Cowboys finally took advantage of an inexplicable Russell Wilson interception in overtime to set up Brandon Aubrey for a 46-yard field goal to win the game.

Editor’s Picks

2 Related

It was Aubrey’s 64-yard field goal at the end of regulation that sent the game to overtime — a once-in-a-lifetime boot for most professionals that seems almost ho-hum for the league’s biggest leg. Cowboys kickers have a habit of bailing out coaches who mismanage end-game scenarios the moment their team crosses that fake “field goal range” line, and Brian Schottenheimer appears to be no exception.

After a Prescott pass to Jake Ferguson got the ball to midfield with nine seconds left, the Cowboys decided against using their two remaining timeouts and their $60-million-per-year quarterback to make Aubrey’s kick easier. Instead, they handed the ball off to Javonte Williams for a 3-yard gain. Aubrey came through, but that sort of late-game management won’t play well when the Cowboys try to beat stiffer competition.

The Giants weren’t supposed to give the Cowboys much trouble after an ugly loss to the Commanders in Week 1. But in what was seen as potentially his final start as a pro QB if he played poorly, Wilson put together his best start since leaving Seattle. Through the end of regulation, his 93.1 Total QBR was the second-best mark of the day and would have been the best mark he posted in a game since the 2021 season. After hitting Malik Nabers with a 48-yard touchdown pass to take the lead back for the Giants with 25 seconds to go, Wilson was 27-of-36 for 433 yards, three touchdown passes and no picks. He took just two sacks on 39 dropbacks and added a first down on a 15-yard scramble.

Of course, I’m leaving overtime out of that equation, and that appeared to be the moment when the carriage turned into a pumpkin. The Giants couldn’t score on the second drive of the extra session, when a field goal would have won them the game. When Wilson got the ball back again, he threw an incomprehensible interception under pressure.

Generously, I’d like to think that he was trying to throw the ball out of bounds in Nabers’ direction (or somewhere close enough to make it a 50-50 ball) and just missed by about 5 yards. However, there was nothing in the pass concept suggesting that Wilson was throwing somewhere Nabers was supposed to be on that play. The interception didn’t end the game — the Cowboys only took over on their own 30-yard line — but it changed the Giants’ best-case scenario from a win to a tie.

Before then, though, Wilson was having a blast picking the Cowboys apart deep. On throws traveling 20 or more yards in the air during regulation, Wilson went 7-of-10 for 264 yards and three scores. The last time somebody completed seven or more deep passes in a game was when Nick Mullens did it for the Vikings against the Lions on Christmas Eve in 2023. And frankly, while these aren’t easy throws, the only one of these completions that was really spectacular was the late TD pass to Nabers to take the lead. I say that less to disparage what Wilson did and more to just emphasize how vacant and open for business the Cowboys’ defense was downfield.

Wilson picked them apart with big throws against all kinds of coverages. The Giants hit two long completions against Tampa 2, where linebackers Kenneth Murray Jr. and Jack Sanborn couldn’t get near seam routes from Wan’Dale Robinson. Nabers torched Trevon Diggs off the line for a big gain on a fade. Wilson hit a couple more go balls against three-deep looks, where Diggs and fellow starting cornerback Kaiir Elam just couldn’t get close enough to squeeze routes. And then there were a pair of long completions against quarters coverage, where the two corners were simply going to have to run with the Giants’ wide receivers and couldn’t do so.

play

0:19

Russell Wilson’s heave finds Malik Nabers for late go-ahead TD

Russell Wilson airs out a 48-yard touchdown pass to Malik Nabers to give the Giants a late lead in the fourth quarter.

Personnel-wise, perhaps none of this should be surprising. Elam wasn’t able to get on the field consistently for much of his tenure with the Bills, and he wasn’t convincing when Buffalo did get him in the lineup. Murray, another former first-rounder and fellow addition for the Cowboys this offseason, has allowed a career passer rating north of 107 in coverage. And Sanborn is in Dallas because he played under new defensive coordinator Matt Eberflus in Chicago and came cheap, with the former undrafted free agent making $1.5 million in 2025.

Diggs, meanwhile, is the microcosm of why things are so frustrating for the Cowboys on defense and unlikely to get better. He has struggled to get back to his former form after tearing his ACL early in the 2023 season, but it’s going to be even more difficult in 2025 because of what the Cowboys have done to their roster. Last season, even with Micah Parsons sidelined for four games (ankle), the Cowboys were sixth in pressure rate and second in sack rate. In fact, Dallas led the league in both categories across Parsons’ four years with the organization before his recent trade to Green Bay.

Without Parsons, the Cowboys are still generating pressures, but the sacks haven’t come. They rank sixth in pressure rate but just 19th in sack rate, and that has come against two of the most sack-friendly quarterbacks in football in Wilson and Jalen Hurts. Against pressure, Wilson was 6-of-10 for 99 yards and a touchdown throw before the overtime interception.

When Diggs and currently injured cornerback DaRon Bland were at their best during the Dan Quinn days in Dallas, the presence and even the threat of Parsons influenced what opposing coordinators were comfortable calling. It was easier for two of the league’s most aggressive corners to sit on routes, trusting that Parsons would get home before any receiver could get past them. And while that still led to some big plays and long completions, Diggs and Bland were able to more than make up for the missteps with league-leading interception totals.

Now, without that reliable pass rush, the cornerbacks can’t sit on routes at the sticks and trust that the ball is going to come out quick. They have to be prepared to consistently deal with scramble drills and plays out of structure. You might have noticed that Jayden Daniels went 3-of-10 for 44 yards on throws 10 or more yards downfield on Thursday night against Parsons’ new team; Green Bay’s corners — the weakest spot on its roster — suddenly have much easier lives as a product of their new star teammate.

Even while allowing the explosives downfield, the Cowboys were able to survive by relying on New York’s penchant for self-immolation in the red zone. In a matchup of last season’s worst red zone offense against its worst red zone defense, the Cowboys swung the game in their favor by limiting the Giants to one touchdown, three field goals and a turnover on downs across five trips inside the 20-yard line.

One of those was on a meltdown from fill-in left tackle James Hudson III, who was benched and limited to special teams duties after he committed two unnecessary roughness penalties and two false starts in a four-play sequence. One of the penalties cost the Giants a first-and-goal opportunity at the 2-yard line after a deep Robinson catch. It would have been one of the more unique moments of Sunday’s action if Xavien Howard hadn’t strung together four penalties in six plays for the Colts later in the afternoon.

play

0:16

Donovan Wilson gives Cowboys ball back with OT INT

Donovan Wilson leaps to pick off Russell Wilson and give the Cowboys the ball back in overtime.

There isn’t just one problem for the Giants in the red zone. One drive stalled because of the Hudson penalties. Another ended on downs when Cam Skattebo dropped a pass into the flat that would have produced a first down. Kenny Clark had back-to-back pressures to blow up another sequence and force the Giants into a field goal. In general, the Giants can’t run the ball consistently, and the only truly dynamic playmaker they have in tight quarters is Nabers.

Through two weeks, by EPA per play, the Giants are the fourth-best offense in the NFL outside the red zone but the worst by a considerable margin inside the 20-yard line. I would say that has to regress toward the mean, but I was also saying that before the season — and well, it hasn’t yet.

The Cowboys narrowly avoided their nightmare scenario of starting 0-2 in the division. Amid the widespread frustration surrounding Parsons’ departure, there are a few reasons to be optimistic. The run game has been surprisingly effective early this season, with Williams turning 18 carries into 97 yards against the Giants, including a 30-yard touchdown. As Jerry Jones would happily tell you, Dallas’ run defense is better than it has been in years past, too. And with some better hands from CeeDee Lamb against the Eagles, they might be 2-0 right now.

Of course, without a spectacular kick from Aubrey, the Cowboys might also be 0-2.

Some back-and-forth battles are more spectacular than others. That fateful Bills-Chiefs game in the 2021 postseason was a prize fight with two great teams trading haymakers and somehow surviving to land another shot. The Broncos-Colts game in Indianapolis was something closer to two teams opening the door for each other and refusing to go through. The last one to make a critical mistake was going to lose.

That mistake came from the Broncos, who appeared to be escaping with a two-point win after a Spencer Shrader field goal miss from 60 yards, only for a long conference among officials to end with defender Dondrea Tillman getting flagged 15 yards for leverage. He attempted to dive over the center and instead hit him with an Ultimate Warrior-esque big splash. Teammate Eyioma Uwazurike clearly pushed down on long-snapper Luke Rhodes to help create more space for Tillman’s leap. It’s one of the more obscure rules in the NFL to decide a game in recent memory, but it is a clear and obvious foul. Shrader hit a 45-yarder with his ensuing kick to push the Colts to 2-0 and drop the Broncos to 1-1.

From the Broncos’ side, this felt like the same story for the second consecutive week, just told with a completely different plot and a new ending. Last week, an abysmal performance from Bo Nix kept the Titans in the game. But despite turning the ball over four times, the Broncos were able to ride a dominant defensive display against a hapless Titans offensive line to hold onto a narrow lead before sealing things up with their running game in the fourth quarter.

Catch up on NFL Week 2

• Takeaways, questions from all games »
• Graziano overreacts to Week 2 »
• Barnwell on three comeback wins »
• Fantasy football winners and losers »
• Full Week 2 scoreboard » | More »

This week, Nix was much better for most of the contest, going 22-of-30 for 206 yards, three touchdown passes and an interception. The jittery feet, inconsistent ball placement and ill-advised decision-making that popped up throughout Nix’s Week 1 performance weren’t on display against the Colts, especially during an excellent first half. He made a beautiful throw on a scramble drill to hit Troy Franklin for 42 yards in the second quarter, wasn’t sacked and turned just under 37% of his dropbacks into first downs, which is right above league average. His 72.6 Total QBR was up more than 45 points from where it fell in Week 1, when Nix finished 29th of 32 quarterbacks.

But after turning the ball over three times against the Titans, Nix threw a critical interception in the fourth quarter. With the Broncos up five points and in position to either kick a field goal or potentially go up two scores with a touchdown, Nix was put into a dropback passing situation on third-and-3 and attempted to throw the ball with defensive lineman Grover Stewart in his face. The tackle deflected the pass, and while Nix had an open Courtland Sutton on a crosser, the throw wobbled and sailed to safety Cam Bynum, who picked up his second INT in two games with Indianapolis.

For the second week in a row, there also were special teams blunders. After a Colts field goal got them to within one score, the Broncos drove back into field goal range, only for Wil Lutz to miss a 42-yarder with 3:20 left that would have restored Denver’s five-point lead. On a day in which Shrader was 5-for-5 on field goal tries, the miss by Lutz meant the Broncos lost out on six points on trips near or into the red zone.

And there were also penalty issues. After J.K. Dobbins had a 23-yard run to put the Broncos briefly into the red zone, he was flagged and penalized five yards for spiking the football. On the next play, the Broncos ran Dobbins for no gain, and tight end Adam Trautman was flagged for a face mask penalty, pushing the Broncos into a first-and-25 situation. A screen on third-and-24 got them back into field goal range, but the penalties brought the drive to a halt and kept them from scoring a touchdown that probably would have sealed the game.

Last week, the Broncos had a significant margin of error for mistakes on offense and special teams because their defense was able to bully the opposing offense. But this week, the Broncos’ defense wasn’t able to carry Sean Payton’s team to a victory. It allowed the Colts to average more than 7 yards per play and make six trips into the red zone. And Indy became only the second team in NFL history (after the 2024 Commanders) to go two consecutive games without a punt, fumble or interception.

The Broncos weren’t able to slow down the Colts’ run game in particular, with Jonathan Taylor gashing Denver for 165 yards on 25 carries. Though the Colts lost Ryan Kelly and Will Fries to the Vikings in free agency and swapped out Anthony Richardson Sr. (who played a meaningful role in the quarterback run game) for Daniel Jones (who has mostly been limited to sneaks and scrambles), they’ve been extremely impressive on the ground to start the season.

They were able to take advantage of a tactic that’s becoming widespread around the NFL. Defenses have been stemming (or making slight adjustments to their alignment or front just before the snap) for years. But after seeing it come more into vogue with the best college defenses in recent seasons, we’re seeing more NFL defenses use it to create confusion for blocking schemes just before the snap.

On Sunday, the Colts hit three first downs in the second half on run plays in which the Broncos stemmed just before the snap, trying to change the blocking calculus for the offensive line or free up their linebackers to attack the football. Those runs all hit the places the Broncos were making late adjustments. There’s nothing wrong with stemming or making late adjustments on the front as a tool, but just as it creates uncertainty for the offense, it can also make things hairy for the defense on the fly. Take the 68-yard run by Taylor in the fourth quarter on the drive after the Nix interception.

THERE GOES JONATHAN TAYLOR. 69 YARDS!

DENvsIND on CBS/Paramount+https://t.co/HkKw7uXVnt pic.twitter.com/PJaCD6ZM0x

— NFL (@NFL) September 14, 2025

It’s tough to see on replay, but just before the play begins, edge defender Jonathon Cooper sneaks one gap to the interior and tries to create more difficult blocking angles for the run blitz that’s coming from cornerback Ja’Quan McMillian. The Colts are running a wham concept, where the tight end comes across the play after the snap and attempts to take on an unblocked defensive lineman; in this case, Tyler Warren has to get on his horse to try to influence nose tackle D.J. Jones. Jones nearly makes the tackle for a loss, but Warren does just enough to get him out of Taylor’s way, while McMillian is blocked out of the play by Michael Pittman Jr.

Now, the Broncos have to improvise. Alex Singleton ends up in the gap where Cooper was before he stemmed, but Taylor does a great job of quickly regaining his balance and juking Singleton before running away from him. Taylor actually has two potential lanes to hit for huge gains after beating Singleton; he chooses to go outside, simply accelerating away from safety Brandon Jones and heading up the sideline.

The Broncos thrive in coverage, meanwhile, by playing a ton of man. With cornerback Pat Surtain II capable of taking on anybody one-on-one, the Broncos played man coverage on 56.3% of opposing dropbacks last season, the second-highest rate in the NFL. They led the league in EPA per dropback (minus-0.07) on those man coverage snaps and were comfortably the best defense in man by the same metric against the Titans in Week 1.

Yet on Sunday, Jones went 13-of-22 against man coverage for 221 yards. The Broncos pressured him on more than 54% of his man-coverage dropbacks but turned only one of those 12 pressures into a sack. Jones and his offense deserve credit for what they accomplished in those moments, but Colts coach Shane Steichen also had an answer for all the man coverage ready to go.

Everyone’s favorite man-beating play in the NFL is mesh, the concept that almost always includes two crossers passing in opposite directions over the middle of the field, an over route above those crossers and a wheel or “rail” route out of the backfield. Steichen’s Colts run mesh more than most teams, and while it wasn’t always a success, they went back to mesh over and over again in key situations Sunday, when they felt as if the Broncos were likely to play man.

I counted at least four instances of mesh in important spots. Two were disappointing; Pittman dropped one crosser in the red zone, and though Warren got open on an underneath drag route on fourth-and-2 with 13 minutes to go, Jones was pressured and sailed his throw. (He also had Taylor open on a wheel route against Tillman for what could have been a touchdown.)

But it worked in two other situations. Taylor caught a touchdown pass in the red zone when the Broncos simply didn’t cover the wheel route, giving Jones one of the easiest throws he’ll ever make for a score. And then on a critical third-and-6 with 1:50 to go, the Colts not only dialed up mesh again but also threw at Surtain, hitting Alec Pierce on the underneath drag route for a huge first down and forcing the Broncos to use their final timeout.

play

0:25

Colts stun Broncos after penalty gives Indy a second chance

Spencer Shrader misses his initial kick, but the Broncos are called for a personal foul, giving the Colts a second chance which is converted for a game-winning field goal.

From there, Steichen curiously chose to take the air out of the football. Indy ran twice for 2 yards, drew the clock down to 17 seconds, took a timeout and then ran the ball a third time with Taylor, who lost two yards on a failed counter run. The Colts obviously were hoping to gain more than 1 yard on those three plays, but I was surprised to see Steichen almost entirely take the ball out of Jones’ hands. Settling for what ended up being a 60-yard field goal was a bad process, even if it ended up working out well for them in the end.

It seems foolish to start the discussion about this game without touching on the biggest storyline. It’s clear that Bengals star quarterback Joe Burrow is going to miss time after suffering a serious toe injury during Sunday’s win over the Jaguars, with further testing to determine whether he will be week-to-week as he heals or sidelined for several months if the injury requires surgery. (Update: Sources told ESPN’s Adam Schefter that Burrow will need surgery.) Neither option would be good, but it’s easier to imagine the Bengals hanging on and playing vaguely .500 ball with Jake Browning at quarterback for one month than it would be for three.

When we last saw Browning starting in 2023, he went 4-3 and had a 60.9 Total QBR, which was good for ninth in the NFL from Week 10 onward. The Bengals helped Browning out by posting the league’s second-best average YAC per reception over that span, but he also had the league’s third-best off-target rate and third-best precise pass rate, the latter measuring how reliably each QB puts the ball on his receivers in stride with throws near the torso. Browning was throwing some of the shortest passes in the league, but he’s an accurate passer.

He’s also prone to more negative plays than Burrow, as Browning ran worse-than-average sack and interception rates during his time under center. While he was sacked only once on Sunday, the backup did throw three interceptions after entering the lineup. Two were wild throws under pressure, including one where the Bengals were not able to pass off a simple twist up front. The third was an attempt to fit a dig into a space that simply was not there. Those sort of throws are going to happen when you haven’t played live football in more than a year.

If all you knew about this game was that Burrow went out in the second quarter, Browning threw three interceptions and the Jaguars scored 27 points, you probably would have assumed that this was going to be a fourth straight losing home opener for the Bengals. And frankly, this should have been a Jags win; when Devin Lloyd intercepted Browning’s pass and handed the ball to Trevor Lawrence’s offense on the Cincinnati 12-yard line with 5:22 to go, the Jaguars were in the driver’s seat. Up three, they needed one touchdown to make it a two-score game, which could have put things out of reach.

All of ESPN. All in one place.

Watch your favorite events in the newly enhanced ESPN App. Learn more about what plan is right for you. Sign Up Now

Instead, Jacksonville melted down. It had some solid success running the football for the second consecutive week, but a misdirection attempt with Travis Etienne Jr. on first down lost four yards. A second-down pass went off Dyami Brown’s fingertips (his second drop of the game). After a third-down run got the Jags to fourth-and-5, Liam Coen called for the Jags to run mesh. (Yes, everybody runs it — and often in key situations.) The Bengals responded by playing zone, which isn’t the ideal look for mesh, but Brian Thomas got open right over the ball, only to drop Lawrence’s pass and turn the ball over on downs.

Let’s talk about the play itself before we get to the decision. Thomas is being hounded on social media after this game for wanting to avoid hits, with the most damning evidence being Lawrence’s second interception of this game, where Thomas appeared to stick one arm out halfheartedly with a collision coming. It’s not a great look, though I’m not sure why Thomas would suddenly exhibit some reticence about contact after breaking plenty of tackles a year ago and racking up 146 yards on tight-window catches, per NFL Next Gen Stats.

I’m also not sure the fourth-down incompletion has anything to do with the other play. While the Jags are running these crossing routes, Thomas’ shallow route has only about two yards of depth, meaning he needed to pick up three yards after the catch to at least move the chains. Because he’s facing zone, he is supposed to throttle down and present a stationary target for Lawrence. (Against man, he would continue running his route to run away from coverage.) As the ball arrives, Thomas begins to turn upfield to look and see where he needs to run for the first down, not whether a hit is coming. It seems more likely that he took his eye off the ball a fraction of a second too early than anything else (although only the second-year wideout can say for sure).

Should the Jags have kicked a field goal to go up six? Overwhelmingly, we can say the answer to this question is no, and it shouldn’t even be considered anything revolutionary or aggressive at this point. Going for it allows you to score a game-sealing touchdown or hold onto the football with a first down or penalty. Even if you fail, you’re handing the ball over deep in opposing territory, with that opponent often anchored to a game-tying field goal down three as opposed to striking for a game-winning touchdown. Down six, that team would have no choice but to play four-down football and go for the jugular.

ESPN’s model had the decision to go for it as a 5.9% win probability swing relative to trying a field goal. The Bengals ultimately didn’t settle for three, but their drive also required two fourth-down conversions, including a 25-yard pass interference penalty on Travis Hunter that extended the game and served as Cincinnati’s biggest play. And if you want to treat what we saw as gospel, of course, the Bengals proved that Jacksonville kicking a field goal to go up six wouldn’t have made a difference, given that they marched downfield for a touchdown on a long field anyway.

Hunter is off to a slow start as a pro. Through two games, he has nine catches for 55 yards on 14 targets as a receiver. An early injury to Jarrian Jones forced Hunter to play 60% of the defensive snaps on Sunday, and while he forced Andrei Iosivas out of bounds to prevent a catch, Hunter allowed a first down via illegal contact before the 25-yard pass interference call that extended the game. With Ja’Marr Chase and Tee Higgins on the other side, it seems telling that the Bengals were willing to put their game on the line with a fade to Iosivas, their third-best wideout, isolated against Hunter. It’s obviously too early to draw meaningful conclusions, but so far, Hunter hasn’t been a difference-maker on either side of the ball.

Realistically, the Jags should have put this game away before it came down to a final drive. In the second quarter, Lawrence threw a brutal interception in the red zone under pressure from Trey Hendrickson and then nearly threw another, only for that one to be overturned. That second drive ended when Lawrence scrambled 3 yards past the line of scrimmage, threw a pass to Brenton Strange and argued for pass interference on what was an illegal forward pass. Brown dropped what should have been an easy touchdown catch on a crossing route in the fourth quarter, too. Both those drives ended in field goals when they should have been touchdowns.

play

0:16

Jake Browning storms over for go-ahead Bengals TD

Jake Browning leaps into the end zone to give the Bengals the lead late in the fourth quarter vs. the Jaguars.

Of course, this stuff happens to the Jaguars all the time. The malaise that eventually ended the Doug Pederson era and brought Coen into town started with the help of Browning, who took on an 8-3 Jaguars team in his second start filling in for Burrow. The Jags were competing for the top seed in the AFC that day, but after Lawrence was injured late and the Jags lost in overtime, it started a brutal losing streak. They lost 18 of Pederson’s final 23 games in charge. They went from ascending to rapidly descending overnight.

And with that in mind, you can understand why there’s a fatalistic feeling about what’s going on with the Jags, even though I’m not sure it’s entirely supported by the evidence. Thomas stopping on a route is proof that he doesn’t want to get hit. Lawrence visibly waiving off a Coen criticism in the fourth quarter is a sign that he’s not impressed with his new coach. Blowing the late lead with some dismal work in the red zone is a sign that these are the same old Jaguars.

Maybe they are. I’m just not sure I’m comfortable drawing that conclusion after two games, especially given that they were a drop or a pass interference penalty away from starting 2-0. That Coen has finally gotten the run game going and that the defense has nearly as many interceptions in two games (five) as it did all of last season (six) are more meaningful positives to me.

And as for the Bengals, well, luck is in the eye of the beholder. It’s obviously not lucky to lose your MVP candidate at quarterback for a significant stretch of time in September. And yet, does this feel like a team that deserves to be 2-0? The offense melted down against the Browns, who lost after their kicker missed an extra point and a chip-shot field goal in the second half. The Bengals turned the ball over three times and needed some very fortuitous drops to win Sunday. I’m not sure they can keep playing this way and expect to keep racking up victories.

And unfortunately, with a two-game road trip against the Vikings and Broncos to come, they’re about to face much stiffer defensive competition without their best player.





Source link

September 16, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
WLFI finds a bull in the chaos, trader expects a comeback
Crypto Trends

WLFI finds a bull in the chaos, trader expects a comeback

by admin September 8, 2025



Backed by the Trump family and mired in controversy, World Liberty Financial’s WLFI token is now attracting bullish calls from top traders despite its turbulent debut.

Michaël van de Poppe sees the volatile newcomer staging a comeback, eyeing a move to $0.30 after bouncing from recent lows. WLFI’s price action has been anything but quiet: a blockbuster presale, a splashy exchange debut, a near 50% drop from its peak, and controversy surrounding early investor Justin Sun, whose wallet was blacklisted after suspicious transfers.

With momentum building above $0.19, van de Poppe is leaning into the chaos, calling WLFI’s volatility a trader’s dream.

Summary

  • WLFI jumps 18% in 24h, rebounding to $0.22 from $0.1908 lows.
  • Token is down close to 50% from $0.46 ATH on September 1, 2025.
  • Trader Michaël van de Poppe eyes $0.30 as next upside target.

Poppe says he is actively trading WLFI

WLFI, at last check on Sunday, is up 13% over the previous 24 hours to $0.22, recovering from a low of $0.1908. The token hit an all-time high of $0.46 on Sept. 1, 2025, but has since dropped close to 50% from that peak.

Van de Poppe’s bullish outlook comes amid increased trading volume and volatility that he views as favorable conditions.

The crypto analyst stated he is “actively trading $WLFI” and “loves the volatility” surrounding the token. He identified $0.21 as a potential buying opportunity if the market provides another dip, and mentioned $0.30 as the next target if the current uptrend remains intact.

I’m personally actively trading $WLFI.

I love the volatility. Lots of volume to generate on this one.

Uptrend has started.

I’d personally be interested to be buying the dip around $0.21, if it’s provided.

If trend remains intact –> $0.30 is next. pic.twitter.com/JV8EfOqGDm

— Michaël van de Poppe (@CryptoMichNL) September 7, 2025

With presale rounds in October 2024 at $0.015 per token and January 2025 at $0.05, WLFI’s journey got underway. Around $550 million was raised for the initiative by more than 85,000 investors worldwide. After 99.94% of holders approved for trading, the token went live on September 1, 2025.

Following the launch, WLFI made its debut on well-known exchanges like Binance, OKX, Coinbase, and Kraken. It opened between $0.30 and $0.33 before peaking at $0.46.

Justin Sun drama creates market turbulence

The token’s price action has been complicated by controversy surrounding early investor Justin Sun.

The Tron founder initially invested $30 million in November 2024, which later grew to $75 million.

Blockchain data revealed that a wallet linked to Sun transferred approximately $9 million worth of WLFI tokens to an exchange shortly after the September 1 launch.

This move raised community suspicions about potential market manipulation and dumping strategies.

World Liberty Financial responded decisively on September 3, 2025, by blacklisting Sun’s wallet address. This action froze nearly 595 million unlocked tokens worth over $100 million, plus an additional 2.4 billion locked tokens.

Current trading patterns show WLFI has found support above $0.19 and is building momentum toward higher resistance levels. This supports the technical case for van de Poppe’s bullish outlook.





Source link

September 8, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
$55 Million in Bitcoin Scooped From Binance in Major Whale Comeback
Crypto Trends

$55 Million in Bitcoin Scooped From Binance in Major Whale Comeback

by admin September 7, 2025


With the crypto market showing signs of a potential rebound, Bitcoin and other top altcoins have moved to the green zone. Amid this positive price trajectory, Bitcoin whales appear to have relented from market sell-offs as data provided by on-chain monitoring firm Whale Alert shows major BTC buy activity.

The source revealed it has spotted a huge Bitcoin transaction, which involved 500 BTC being emptied from the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange Binance in a matter of minutes.

You Might Also Like

While the transaction happened during the mid hours of Sept. 7 when Bitcoin was trading at $111,132, the large BTC scooped out of Binance during the time was worth about $55,566,215.

Although the intention behind the major Bitcoin transaction was not specified, market watchers have perceived the move to be a Bitcoin buy activity from a high profile investor or an institution due to the nature of the transfer.

Bitcoin rebound restores market confidence

With the major BTC accumulation coming at a time when the leading cryptocurrency is moving upward, showing signs of a potential price resurgence, the move comes as no surprise.

While Bitcoin had experienced mixed price action during the week, surging to about $113K and falling as low as $107,000, it appears to be closing the week on a positive note.

After falling below the $110,000 mark in the previous day amid a broad market bloodbath, it appears to be regaining momentum as it returns slowly to the upside, trading at $111,374 as of press time, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

Source: CoinMarketCap

Though slow, Bitcoin’s price appears to be gradually headed for a major breakout. Hence, the whale’s decision to buy and move such a large amount of BTC from a top exchange hints at a bullish shift in investor sentiment in preparation for a major price move.

Over the last day, Bitcoin has been moving slowly in its trading price, but on a positive path as it shows a decent price surge of 0.27%. However, the asset’s trading volume during the period has slumped massively by about 18.45%, suggesting that the demand for the asset is still outweighed by speculative trading from exiting investors.



Source link

September 7, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Battlefield 6 gameplay
Esports

Left 4 Dead’s creator is making a comeback to create the next big co-op shooter

by admin August 31, 2025



Left 4 Dead creator and lead designer Mike Booth announced that he’s stepping back into game development and feels that there’s some unfinished business. He’s aiming to make the next big co-op shooter.

Left 4 Dead is a series that has only two games, both of which are close to two decades old at this point. However, these two titles still have an iron grip on the games industry, with their influence being tangible to this day.

Article continues after ad

Mike Booth, the main creator and lead designer of the original game, is coming back with a completely different studio backing him to try and make lightning strike the same spot twice.

What’s more, they’re far enough along in development that they’ve started taking playtest applicants.

Left 4 Dead creator is looking for playtesters on a new project

Mike Booth’s career has hopped around a lot since leaving Turtle Rock Studios in 2012. He was with the studio through Left 4 Dead 1 and 2 but left to join Blizzard and work on an unannounced project.

Article continues after ad

Article continues after ad

Turns out this project “wasn’t a good fit” for the company according to Booth himself, and he left to go work with Facebook (now Meta) on VR projects.

These days he works with Bad Robot Games, a subdivision of JJ Abrams’ film and TV production company of the same name. They’ve got a newly formed internal development studio that’s backing Mike Booth’s vision and has been working on this game for a while.

Article continues after ad

“I’m Mike Booth (creator of Left 4 Dead), and I’m excited to share that I’m working on a brand new project —a 4-player co-op shooter built on the foundations of what made L4D special,” he explained in a Reddit post.

Left 4 Dead 2The cast of Left 4 Dead and Left 4 Dead 2 are still iconic to this day.

“If you enjoyed the teamwork, tension, and replayability of my past games, you’ll probably find this one interesting. It expands on the co-op formula in ways I’ve wanted to explore for a long time.”

Article continues after ad

Article continues after ad

And, while it’s not close to release by the sound of it, he has opened up a signup form for playtesters to get some early opinions on the title. You can sign up for that playtest here.

Upon signing up, there’s a small bit of information about the title, the only thing we currently know about this game other than it being a co-op shooter: It’s currently called “Project Tacoma”.

It remains to be seen if Mike Booth can recapture the magic of Left 4 Dead and create a genre-defining title all these years later. However, considering that the core Left 4 Dead series has no sign of getting a new entry from Valve, fans are excited to potentially get a new game.

Article continues after ad



Source link

August 31, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Bitcoin price
Crypto Trends

Bitcoin Price Staging A Comeback? On-Chain Signals Suggest Market Bottom Is In

by admin August 31, 2025


Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The Bitcoin price has struggled to break free of its horrid run of performances over the past few days, continuing to move below the $110,000 mark. While the flagship cryptocurrency appears to be relatively more stable in the past day, concerns are still swirling around about the coin’s struggles beneath critical levels.

According to a prominent market expert on X, the Bitcoin price could be gearing up to make a comeback in the coming days. The latest on-chain signals suggest that the market leader might have hit a price bottom, hinting that a trend reversal could be imminent.

Bitcoin Price Structure Might Be Bottoming Out: Analyst

In an August 30 post on X, crypto analyst Willy Woo revealed that the Bitcoin price structure might be bottoming out. The online pundit hinted that the world’s largest cryptocurrency might be at the start of its recovery journey after weeks of sluggish price action.

Woo highlighted a couple of on-chain metrics to back this optimistic outlook for the Bitcoin price. Firstly, the analyst mentioned the capital inflow metric, which tracks the amount of money that flows into the flagship cryptocurrency within a given period.

Source: @woonomic on X

As observed in the chart above, the Bitcoin network recently recorded its “first daily print” of positive inflows after weeks of outflows. According to Woo, this increasing flow into the BTC network is the first sign that the Bitcoin price might have reached a bottom.

Furthermore, Woo highlighted that the Macro Cycle Risk formed a new lower high and has triggered a drop in risk. Typically, a decline in the Macro Cycle Risk indicator suggests that liquidity is returning to the Bitcoin network, which could signal the start of buying pressure for the market leader.

Source: @woonomic on X

In the post on X, the crypto analyst also mentioned that the Risk-Off signal has reached a local peak and is on the decline. This drop suggests that investors are moving away from caution and might be looking to invest their money into risk assets, including cryptocurrencies.

Ultimately, Woo concluded that the Bitcoin price is stabilizing and seems to be forming a bullish structure already. The pundit, however, noted that investors would need to keep buying the dip for the bullish structure to fully form.

Bitcoin Price At A Glance

As of this writing, the price of BTC stands at around $108,756, reflecting an almost 1% increase in the past 24 hours.

The price of BTC on the daily timeframe | Source: BTCUSDT chart from TradingView

Featured image from iStock, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.



Source link

August 31, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Bitcoin (BTC) Bull Run Cancelled? Shiba Inu (SHIB) Hits 0 in Key Metric, XRP's Unthinkable Comeback
Crypto Trends

Bitcoin (BTC) Bull Run Cancelled? Shiba Inu (SHIB) Hits 0 in Key Metric, XRP’s Unthinkable Comeback

by admin August 25, 2025


  • Shiba Inu is anemic
  • XRP’s bounce

A crucial question has been raised by Bitcoin’s recent market performance: Is the bull run already over, or is this just a mid-cycle pause? BTC has had difficulty maintaining upward momentum since hitting a new high earlier this summer, and recent price action indicates the rally may be losing steam. Because Bitcoin has failed to stay above the 50-day EMA, this is the main problem. In the past, this level has served as a solid basis for bullish continuation, however, in the present configuration Bitcoin tried to break through but failed.

The rejection at this moving average indicates a market where buying pressure is insufficient to sustain the subsequent leg up, and indicates a weakness in demand. Volume has been continuously dropping, adding to the bearish weight, and indicating that traders are not very confident. Every correction during prior strong bull phases was greeted by aggressive buybacks and increased volume inflows. Now, the lack of these indicators suggests hesitancy on the part of investors who are hesitant to commit to additional upside.

BTC/USDT Chart by TradingView

The next logical area of support for Bitcoin is around the 100 EMA, which is close to $111,000, if it is unable to regain the 50 EMA anytime soon. A test of that area might significantly strain sentiment, and possibly prolong the correction. The story would change from a healthy retracement to a more comprehensive trend reversal if it breaks below it.

The failed 50 EMA breakthrough, however, indicates that the road to higher highs might be postponed for the time being. The main resistance level that investors should keep a close eye on is $116,000. Talk of a sustained bull run seems premature in the absence of a clear move above it.

Shiba Inu is anemic

Shiba Inu’s recent trading sessions have seen nearly zero volatility, signaling the start of an extremely stagnant phase. Although symmetrical triangles are frequently used to precede breakouts, the current dynamics indicate that SHIB may be headed for a protracted period of sideways movement rather than an explosive rally.

According to the chart, SHIB has been steadily tightening between levels of support and convergent resistance. Every recovery attempt has been capped by the upper descending trendline, and the July ascending support has prevented the token from dropping further. This gives the appearance of a balanced market that lacks clear-cut momentum.

You Might Also Like

It is a double-edged sword that volatility has dropped to almost zero. It lessens the possibility of unexpected malfunctions in the near future, on the one hand. On the contrary, it indicates that liquidity is dwindling and that traders are generally disinterested at current levels. The price may move indistinguishably for weeks as a result of this type of compression.

There has been a consistent drop in volume, and the token is still below its major moving averages. A breakout from this triangle might be more noise than signal if there isn’t a significant catalyst or a spike in demand. This means patience is key for investors.

The absence of volatility raises the possibility that stagnation rather than growth will characterize the foreseeable future, even though the symmetrical triangle can ultimately resolve in either direction. It is unlikely that the market will regain momentum in the near future unless SHIB recovers important levels above $0.0000135 and $0.0000141.

XRP’s bounce

After a sharp decline, XRP recently made one of the most unexpected recoveries of the summer, rising above the 50-day EMA. The asset appeared destined to decline further toward the 100-day EMA near $2.75, making this recovery nearly impossible. Rather, XRP abruptly reversed course, pushing back above short-term resistance and surprising the market. Because of how swiftly sentiment changed, the move has been called an unthinkable comeback.

You Might Also Like

A few sessions ago, XRP was on the edge of diving below the 100 EMA as it struggled to stay above $2.80. Volume was declining, and momentum indicators were weak. Nevertheless, the market managed to muster enough strength to push the token back above the 50 EMA, giving investors hope for a possible continuation rally.

There is a catch to this rally though. Although the 50 EMA breakout appears promising, XRP never really broke through its 26 EMA support. It may not be as strong as it looks because the price tested it several times but was unable to close much below it. In summary, technical resilience rather than fresh demand is the foundation of XRP’s recovery. This raises doubts about the rally’s viability.

Should XRP fail to gain traction above $3.05 and retest the $3.20-$3.30 range, the move may not last as long as it seems. The market might retest the 100 EMA if it is unable to hold above the 50 EMA, at which point genuine support would need to be verified. For the time being, holders of XRP can find solace in this improbable recovery, but the warning indicators are still there: This recovery could be brief in the absence of volume and more solid fundamentals.



Source link

August 25, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • 2

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (1,098)
  • Esports (800)
  • Game Reviews (772)
  • Game Updates (906)
  • GameFi Guides (1,058)
  • Gaming Gear (960)
  • NFT Gaming (1,079)
  • Product Reviews (960)

Recent Posts

  • This 5-Star Dell Laptop Bundle (64GB RAM, 2TB SSD) Sees 72% Cut, From Above MacBook Pricing to Practically a Steal
  • Blue Protocol: Star Resonance is finally out in the west and off to a strong start on Steam, but was the MMORPG worth the wait?
  • How to Unblock OpenAI’s Sora 2 If You’re Outside the US and Canada
  • Final Fantasy 7 Remake and Rebirth finally available as physical double pack on PS5
  • The 10 Most Valuable Cards

Recent Posts

  • This 5-Star Dell Laptop Bundle (64GB RAM, 2TB SSD) Sees 72% Cut, From Above MacBook Pricing to Practically a Steal

    October 10, 2025
  • Blue Protocol: Star Resonance is finally out in the west and off to a strong start on Steam, but was the MMORPG worth the wait?

    October 10, 2025
  • How to Unblock OpenAI’s Sora 2 If You’re Outside the US and Canada

    October 10, 2025
  • Final Fantasy 7 Remake and Rebirth finally available as physical double pack on PS5

    October 10, 2025
  • The 10 Most Valuable Cards

    October 10, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • This 5-Star Dell Laptop Bundle (64GB RAM, 2TB SSD) Sees 72% Cut, From Above MacBook Pricing to Practically a Steal

    October 10, 2025
  • Blue Protocol: Star Resonance is finally out in the west and off to a strong start on Steam, but was the MMORPG worth the wait?

    October 10, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close