Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

Chrome

Chromebooks vs. PC: The Differences Between Chrome OS and Windows
Product Reviews

Chromebooks vs. PC: The Differences Between Chrome OS and Windows

by admin September 25, 2025


The big limitation with Chromebook software is in downloading applications from the web. With Chromebooks, you just can’t. So that means you can’t download more advanced software like video editing, photo editing, or industry-specific applications. The only apps you can download are the Android apps you’ll find in the Google Play Store. This can be helpful to fill in the gaps, though most of the web apps will be better solutions, as not all of these apps are well-optimized for touchpads. Fortunately, there are many touchscreen-enabled Chromebooks that feel more natural to control.

Because it’s primarily a web browser, Chromebooks aren’t as useful when away from Wi-Fi. You can still use offline mode in some applications like Google Docs, but for the most part, you’ll want to stay connected. These days, I’m not sure that’s too different from how people use Windows laptops.

Hardware compatibility is the other big issue you may run into. Most printers, mice, keyboards, and other accessories should work just fine on Chromebooks. In some cases, such as Wacom tablets, there are some models that Google has specifically certified. But again, it’s some of the industry-specific gadgets that will cause problems with Chromebooks. For example, I can’t use my USB colorimeter, which is how I test and calibrate screens. Because there’s no compatible software, that colorimeter doesn’t work. By contrast, Windows is the default native operating system, meaning every application imaginable is available to download.

Chromebook Plus vs. Windows Laptops

  • Photograph: Luke Larsen

  • Photograph: Luke Larsen

  • Photograph: Luke Larsen

While the best laptop hardware is still found in Windows laptops and MacBooks, Chromebooks are catching up. The “Chromebook Plus” certification has helped over the past couple of years, which is Google’s relatively recent program to increase the hardware standards of Chromebooks.

Chromebook Plus models are required to have faster chips, like an Intel Core i3 or AMD Ryzen 3, as well as at least 8 GB of RAM, 128 GB of storage, and a 1080p IPS display. You can find a lot of Chromebook Plus models for around $500, too, such as the Acer Chromebook Plus 515 or the HP Chromebook Plus x360.

But this year, the standard got moved up even further with the Lenovo Chromebook Plus 14. As I stated in my review, this is the best Chromebook ever made, going above and beyond the requirements of Chromebook Plus. It’s got a bright OLED display, has a solid webcam and speakers, up to 16 GB of RAM, and up to 256 GB of storage. Even more importantly, it gets fantastic battery life, competitive with some of the latest Windows laptops. For $750, that’s a really solid deal for the hardware. It has a better display than something like the Asus Vivobook 14, and you’d be hard-pressed to find something at this price with better hardware. You can make the argument that you’re getting a more limited software experience, but in terms of hardware, it’s a great value.

There is some Windows laptop hardware you’ll never get on Chromebooks, such as discrete graphics. You’re probably not considering a Chromebook if you’re a PC gamer anyway, unless it’s just for game streaming via GeForce Now or Xbox Game Pass.

Why Buy a Chromebook in 2025?

Chromebooks are more than just cheap laptops, but that doesn’t mean they don’t excel at those lower prices. Around $500 is the cut-off point for what I’d consider to be truly cheap laptops, and you’ll always have to accept some level of compromise in that tier. Windows laptops under $500 are often bloated, overly thick, poor performers that are both ugly and have disappointing battery life. Most often, they are not good options, even for students.

On the contrary, there are lots of Chromebooks under $500 that will do you much better. I recently tested the Asus Chromebook CX14 and CX15, both of which are under $300. These aren’t perfect laptops by any means, with lower-quality screens than I’d like. But as a basic laptop, it’s certainly better than any $300 Windows laptop you’d be able to find.



Source link

September 25, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Critical Chrome Exploit Could Drain Your Crypto, CTO of French Hardware Wallet Giant Warns
GameFi Guides

Critical Chrome Exploit Could Drain Your Crypto, CTO of French Hardware Wallet Giant Warns

by admin September 18, 2025


Charles Guillemet, chief technology officer at Ledger, has issued a security warning about a major Chrome vulnerability that could potentially allow hackers to drain one’s crypto wallet. 

The “Type Confusion” bug, which was recently discovered by security researchers, makes it possible for bad actors to run malicious code by treating one type of data as another. It has been found within V8, the engine that executes JavaScript and WebAssembly. 

Simply visiting a malicious website could make it possible for attackers to steal highly sensitive data, including private keys, seed phrases, or wallet files.

You Might Also Like

Hence, Guillemet is not recommending storing any sensitive data locally. 

Google’s urgent response 

Within just 48 hours of the critical vulnerability being detected, Google swiftly moved to publish an emergency update. Chrome users have to make sure that they are using the fixed version (140.0.7339.185). 

It is worth noting that all Chromium-based web browsers have been affected, including Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi. 



Source link

September 18, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Decrypt logo
Crypto Trends

Google Keeps Chrome as Judge Rejects Breakup: Here’s Why It Matters

by admin September 3, 2025



In brief

  • The ruling lets Google keep Chrome while imposing limits on exclusivity and new data-sharing obligations.
  • Google relied on default agreements and preferential treatment that reinforced its dominance in search, the DOJ said.
  • Analysts say the remedies are less drastic but still leave Google’s core moat intact.

A U.S. federal judge declined to force Google to sell its Chrome web browser in a landmark antitrust case on Tuesday, instead imposing remedies aimed at loosening the tech giant’s grip on online search and advertising.

Handed down by Judge Amit Mehta in Washington on Tuesday, the ruling allows Google to retain its browser while prohibiting it from entering exclusive contracts for its product suite across Search, Chrome, Google Assistant, and its Gemini AI app.

“For years, Google accounted for approximately 90 percent of all search queries in the U.S., and Google used anticompetitive tactics to maintain and extend its monopolies in search and search advertising,” the U.S. Department of Justice wrote in a statement.



Google entered into “a series of exclusionary agreements” that “locked up” how ordinary users accessed and searched online, with the company requiring itself to be the “preset default general search engine on billions of mobile devices and computers,” the DOJ wrote.

The tech company used its stature to buy “preferential treatment” for its search engine and created a “self-reinforcing cycle of monopolization,” the department added.

Judge Mehta’s order specifically requires Google to share portions of its search index and user-interaction data with qualified competitors and to offer syndication of search and text ads, according to multiple reports, though a copy of the order has not surfaced at the time of writing.

Decrypt has reached out to Google for comment.

Still in play

The case began in 2020 and was joined by nearly every U.S. state and territory. In 2024, the court ruled that Google unlawfully monopolized search in violation of the Sherman Act, which deters companies from monopolizing markets or conspiring to restrict competition.

The ruling comes as Google builds its own layer-1 blockchain and faces rising competition from AI-enabled browsers developed by companies such as Perplexity and OpenAI.

Analysts note that while the remedies impose new obligations, Google’s stature in the tech industry may prove more resilient to dislodgement.

While Google’s Chrome browser retains “its distribution advantage and ecosystem integration,” data sharing could “enable competitors to build better targeting features,” Ryan Yoon, senior analyst at Tiger Research, told Decrypt. 

Still, Google’s “core moat” in search and vertical integration “remains intact” to an extent where “meaningful market share shifts seem unlikely,” Yoon added.

Google’s broader moves into crypto and AI suggest it is positioning for regulated, enterprise-focused infrastructure where “compliance matters more than decentralization,” while betting on “superior data integration” against its AI browser competitors, even if those “could erode their search monopoly,” Yoon said.

‘Less drastic remedies’

Tuesday’s ruling shows “an enormous shift that finally has us leaning favorably towards market “unblocking” rather than interventionist asset splitting,” Andrew Rossow, a public affairs attorney and CEO of AR Media Consulting, told Decrypt.

The case also offers “a more realistic litigation and negotiation strategy,” Rossow said, citing similar ongoing anti-trust considerations from big companies like Meta and Amazon.

Such a strategy points to how the law could offer “less drastic remedies” if “large tech platform providers” can be “reformed through contract and data access regulation,” he added. 

“Our judiciary must adapt to technology’s unpredictability, rather than attempt to dictate the next market winner,” Rossow opined.

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A weekly AI journey narrated by Gen, a generative AI model.



Source link

September 3, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
DAAPrivacyRightIcon
Gaming Gear

Google doesn’t have to sell Chrome, judge in monopoly case rules

by admin September 3, 2025


Google will not have to divest its Chrome browser but will have to change some of its business practices, a federal judge has ruled. The ruling comes more than a year after the same judge ruled that Google had acted illegally to maintain a monopoly in internet search.

Following the ruling last year, the Department of Justice had proposed that Google should be forced to sell Chrome. But in a 230-page decision, Judge Amit Mehta said the government had “overreached” in its request. “Google will not be required to divest Chrome; nor will the court include a contingent divestiture of the Android operating system in the final judgment,” Mehta wrote. “Plaintiffs overreached in seeking forced divesture of these key assets, which Google did not use to effect any illegal restraints.”

Google will, however, no longer be permitted to strike exclusive deals around the distribution of search, Google Assistant, Gemini or Chrome, Mehta ruled. For example, Google can’t require device makers to pre-load its apps in order to get access to the Play Store. It also can’t condition revenue-sharing arrangements on the placement of its apps. But Google will be able to continue to pay partners — like Apple — for pre-loading search and other apps into their products. Mehta said that ending these arrangements could cause “downstream harms to distribution partners, related markets, and consumers.”

Mehta also ruled that Google will need to share some of its search data with competitors going forward. “Making data available to competitors would narrow the scale gap created by Google’s exclusive distribution agreements and, in turn, the quality gap that followed,” he wrote. The company is not required to hand over data related to its ads.

Mehta’s ruling is largely a win for the search giant, which had argued that divesting Chrome or Android “would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership.” In a statement Tuesday, Google said it had “concerns” about some aspects of the ruling.

“Today’s decision recognizes how much the industry has changed through the advent of AI, which is giving people so many more ways to find information,” the company said. “Now the Court has imposed limits on how we distribute Google services, and will require us to share Search data with rivals. We have concerns about how these requirements will impact our users and their privacy, and we’re reviewing the decision closely.”

The company previously indicated it plans to appeal Mehta’s original decision, but said in June it would wait for a final decision in the case.

Update, September 2, 2025, 4:28PM PT: This post has been updated to add a statement from Google on the ruling.



Source link

September 3, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Photo: Jay Fog
Gaming Gear

Google Won’t Have to Sell Chrome Browser After All (But There’s a Catch)

by admin September 2, 2025


A federal judge ruled in a high-profile antitrust case against Google on Tuesday with some good news and bad news for the tech giant. The good news for Google is that it won’t have to sell off its Chrome browser, which was a very real possibility. Google’s stock soared in after hours trading on the news.

The bad news for Google was that it will be required to share data with its rivals and can’t sign many of the exclusive contracts that helped the company become so dominant in the industry.

The ruling, which is available on Court Listener, comes from Judge Amit P. Mehta of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, who first ruled in Aug. 2024 that Google’s search business was an illegal monopoly.

“Google will not be required to divest Chrome; nor will the court include a contingent divestiture of the Android operating system in the final judgment,” the ruling states. “Plaintiffs overreached in seeking forced divesture of these key assets, which Google did not use to effect any illegal restraints.”

The Chrome browser has about 3.5 billion users, which is pretty impressive when you remember that there are only about 8.1 billion people on the entire planet. And AI company Perplexity even made an unsolicited offer to by Chrome last month, though it was considered to be a stunt by many tech industry watchers. Perplexity was offering $34.5 billion but was only valued at the time at about $18 billion, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Tuesday’s ruling explained that Google will need to share “search index and user-interaction data, though not ads data,” with “qualified competitors.” The ruling also says the company “will be barred from entering or maintaining any exclusive contract relating to the distribution of Google Search, Chrome, Google Assistant, and the Gemini app,” though there are a lot of carve outs that will allow Google to enter contracts in order to not harm downstream businesses.

Google also won’t be required to present users with “choice screens on its products or encourage its Android distribution partners to do the same,” according to the ruling. And it won’t have to underwrite a nationwide public education campaign. The U.S. government has presented various remedies after Google was found to be a monopoly, but the judge considered some to be “improper” demands.

Google didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday evening. Gizmodo will update this article if we hear back.

This is a developing story and will be updated.



Source link

September 2, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (1,098)
  • Esports (800)
  • Game Reviews (746)
  • Game Updates (906)
  • GameFi Guides (1,058)
  • Gaming Gear (960)
  • NFT Gaming (1,079)
  • Product Reviews (960)

Recent Posts

  • Skate’s $35 Dead Space Skin Upsets Fans
  • Silent Hill f has a hidden Easter egg that calls back to one of the most iconic horror game themes of all time
  • This Indie Game Punishes You For Skipping Its Cutscenes
  • Here are our Xbox Game Pass games for October
  • Clair Obscur And Choice-Based Games Don’t Have To Validate You

Recent Posts

  • Skate’s $35 Dead Space Skin Upsets Fans

    October 8, 2025
  • Silent Hill f has a hidden Easter egg that calls back to one of the most iconic horror game themes of all time

    October 8, 2025
  • This Indie Game Punishes You For Skipping Its Cutscenes

    October 8, 2025
  • Here are our Xbox Game Pass games for October

    October 8, 2025
  • Clair Obscur And Choice-Based Games Don’t Have To Validate You

    October 8, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • Skate’s $35 Dead Space Skin Upsets Fans

    October 8, 2025
  • Silent Hill f has a hidden Easter egg that calls back to one of the most iconic horror game themes of all time

    October 8, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close