Tag:

Bring

Quantum computers could bring lost Bitcoin back to life: Here’s how
Crypto Trends

Quantum computers could bring lost Bitcoin back to life: Here’s how

by admin



What is quantum technology?

Quantum technology can process an enormous amount of data and solve complex problems in seconds rather than decades.

Remarkably, quantum technology first appeared in the early 1900s. It originated from quantum mechanics, a branch of physics that examines how matter and energy behave at extremely small scales, such as atoms and subatomic particles. 

In the real world, it’s applied in modern technologies such as transistors, lasers, MRI machines and quantum computers. These are said to be 300,000 times faster and more powerful than the ones used nowadays. Google’s new quantum chip, Willow, cuts computation times significantly and may provide hackers with the tools to unlock the algorithms that support Bitcoin and other cryptos.

Quantum computers could threaten Bitcoin’s cryptographic systems, including the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA). Experts such as Adam Back and Michael Saylor argue that quantum threats to Bitcoin aren’t a concern at present because such applications require advanced quantum hardware, which may take years, if not decades, to develop.

Research and development of quantum computers is running at a fast pace, but is Bitcoin quantum-safe at this stage? Not yet, but developers are working to upgrade the network to mitigate possible quantum risks, including breaking encryption.

While it’s important to acknowledge the risks, it’s also essential to clarify that these are far from being actual threats for now.

Did you know? Albert Einstein made significant contributions to the development of quantum technology. He set the ground for quantum mechanics with his work on the photoelectric effect, which revealed what light is made of. He won the Nobel Prize for this, and not for the relativity theory, as many believe. 

How quantum tech could break Bitcoin wallets

Quantum computing could significantly impact Bitcoin. This is mainly because it could undermine the cryptography that protects its network. 

Quantum computing and Bitcoin (BTC) have been a hot topic for a while, and rightly so. It can disrupt the network and potentially break Bitcoin wallets by exploiting vulnerabilities in the asymmetric cryptography that secures them. Specifically, the ECDSA, the asymmetric cryptography used in Bitcoin, is vulnerable to attacks by quantum computers. 

Bitcoin wallets are secured by ECDSA to generate a pair of private-public keys. Its security relies on the hard-to-solve elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem (ECDLP), which is impossible to resolve with classical computers. 

Bitcoin private key cracking with quantum computers is the real issue since private keys control your Bitcoin. If you lose them, you lose your money. When a private-public key pair is generated, the public key is set for verification, and the private key is for signing.

In 1994, mathematician Peter Shor created the Shor quantum algorithm, which can break the perceived security of the algorithms in asymmetric cryptography. All existing algorithms would require a huge amount of time, money and resources to derive a private key from the public key. However, the Shor algorithm will accelerate the process. 

This means that when a person, organization or anyone with a strong quantum computer will be able to use the Shor algorithm, they may generate a private key from a public one and fake digital signatures for transactions.

Bitcoin and quantum security risk

You’ve learned by now that quantum tech could compromise Bitcoin wallets by revealing their private keys. This risk becomes more significant as quantum computers advance, especially for wallets linked to older addresses or those with reused public keys. Quantum computing could make it possible to reverse-engineer private keys from these exposed public keys, threatening the security of Bitcoin holders.

In 2025, quantum computers are supposedly decades away from breaking ECDSA. Even Michael Saylor believes the concerns to be unjustified. Bitcoin users can sit back and relax for now, but they should be aware of the best practices to handle any future quantum threats to Bitcoin.

Here’s a concise breakdown of the relationship between quantum computing and Bitcoin:

Did you know? Quantum computing progress can be assessed by the number of qubits (basic units of information) in one processor. Today, the most powerful quantum computers process between 100 and 1,000 qubits. Estimates for the number of qubits needed to break Bitcoin’s security range from 13 million to 300 million or more.

Can quantum computers recover lost Bitcoin?

Analysts think that between 2.3 million and 3.7 million Bitcoin is permanently lost. This is about 11%-18% of the total fixed supply of 21 million.

What happens to lost Bitcoin when quantum recovery technologies allow dormant wallets to come back to life? Think of Satoshi Nakamoto’s coins alone, which are estimated to be 1 million. If a quantum computer cracks their wallet and releases the coins into circulation, it could lead to big market swings. 

Quantum computers might bring back that lost Bitcoin by cracking the cryptographic keys that protect those wallets. These are usually wallets with lost or hard-to-reach private keys, making them easy targets.

These are likely the oldest versions of Bitcoin addresses, using pay-to-public-key (P2PK) formats, which have never been upgraded or reused. As a result, these addresses remain vulnerable, with no one alive or available to update them. The advancement of quantum computing could potentially exploit these vulnerabilities, unlocking dormant wallets.

In May 2025, global asset manager and technology provider BlackRock added a warning to its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) filing, stating that quantum computing poses a significant risk to Bitcoin’s long-term security due to its ability to break current cryptographic defenses. 

Ethical and economic implications

Recovering lost Bitcoin may raise some economic and ethical implications. Reintroducing those coins into circulation could disrupt Bitcoin’s scarcity attribute, and consequently, its market value could be impacted.

There are already talks on the best ways to preserve Bitcoin’s economic and ethical value. Many, like OG Bitcoin expert Jameson Lopp, believe those coins should be burned and destroyed forever to protect the network; others believe they should be redistributed for wealth balance.

What can you do to protect your Bitcoin?

Minimizing the public key exposure is essential if you want to protect your Bitcoin. Simple measures can help users find greater peace of mind.

Measures to protect your Bitcoin should always be taken into consideration, regardless of the quantum threats. Fraud is a perennial threat in crypto. Phishing is still one of the most common scams in crypto, with the new zero-value scam revealed, where a phony address is added to the transaction history of a targeted wallet. 

When the owner starts a transaction, they may simply choose an address from their history and pick the fraudulent one, without even needing to access a private key.

Approximately 25% of all Bitcoin is stored in addresses that use pay-to-public-key (P2PK) or reused pay-to-public-key-hash (P2PKH). These methods often reveal the public key linked to a user’s address. This is where the crypto vulnerabilities to quantum computing are more clear since the exposed public keys are more prone to quantum attacks through the Shor algorithm.

You can do this by simply avoiding address reuse. Join a platform that helps your wallet change addresses automatically with each transaction. Reusing an address can expose your public key during a transaction.

The best you can do is generate new addresses for each transaction and use wallets that support Taproot and SegWit. Don’t forget to pay special attention when you’re sending transactions to your wallet’s addresses. These wallets provide addresses with better security.

Address poisoning is another type of common phishing technique that has cost users millions of dollars. It happens when bad actors send small transactions from wallet addresses similar to victims’ legitimate ones, thereby deceiving them by making them copy the wrong address when executing future transactions. 

Bitcoin’s quantum resistance: Ongoing research and safety measures

Bitcoin remains resilient against quantum threats for now, with ongoing research into quantum-resistant wallets and protocols like QRAMP to protect its future, while experts explore ways quantum technology could enhance the network.

Bitcoin is decentralized and open-source. Its network adapts well, and ongoing research into quantum-resistant Bitcoin wallets suggests that coins face no immediate threat.

Users should follow best practices, like not reusing addresses, to stay safe until quantum-proof cryptocurrencies and wallets are fully ready and available for use.

Among the initial measures to protect Bitcoin from quantum threats, Bitcoin developer Agustin Cruz proposed a quantum-resistant asset mapping protocol (QRAMP) in early 2025. It is meant to protect Bitcoin from quantum risks while also allowing Bitcoin to work crosschain, extending to other blockchains without compromising custody or supply limits. 

Also, experts are developing powerful quantum-resistant cryptographic techniques, which could benefit Bitcoin in several ways. It may improve scalability, create unhackable wallets and strengthen cryptography. These changes will help the Bitcoin network stay strong and thrive in a new quantum world.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Battlefield 6 player hiding behind cover
Esports

Battlefield 6 Season 1 to bring new maps, modes, weapons, more

by admin



The launch of Battlefield 6 is just the start. Season 1 is already being detailed as EA has revealed new maps, modes, gameplay features, and a whole lot more set to keep players engaged. Here’s the full rundown.

When Battlefield 6 hits store shelves on October 10, players will immediately have access to a surprisingly deep campaign, a litany of multiplayer maps, and down the line, a Battle Royale mode too. However, that’s just the beginning, as EA has made clear.

Article continues after ad

In the live-service era, games with a multiplayer slant are typically supported for months and even years after launch. That’s no different here with the next mainline entry in the juggernaut FPS franchise.

Battlefield 6 Season 1 has already been unveiled in full as EA looks to hook players for the long run. From the start date to all the new content on the way, here’s what you need to know.

Article continues after ad

Battlefield 6 Season 1 start date

Battlefield 6 Season 1 kicks off on Tuesday, October 28. There’s currently no word on an exact start time, but we’re sure to learn plenty more in the coming ways, so stay tuned on that.

Article continues after ad

Of note, however, while that’s the start date for Season 1 as a whole, there are two other crucial dates to keep in mind. Rather than deploying all new content in one fell swoop, devs are drip-feeding bits and pieces over the course of three months.

New maps, weapons, limited-time modes, and more will all trickle out over time. Below is the full breakdown so you know what to expect:

  • October 28, 2025 – Season 1 starts with the Rogue Ops update
  • November 18, 2025 – California Resistance update
  • December 9, 2025 – Winter Offensive update

#Battlefield6 Season 1 begins Oct. 28 on all platforms. Free content rolls out across the season in three phases ⤵️

🔍 Oct. 28: Rogue Ops
☀️ Nov. 18: California Resistance
❄️ Dec. 9: Winter Offensive pic.twitter.com/NE3DQ0xjlV

— Battlefield (@Battlefield) September 30, 2025

New content in Battlefield 6 Season 1

Two new maps throughout Season 1

Topping the bill are two new maps set to shake things up throughout Season 1. On October 28 comes Blackwell Fields, a vast open map set in a recommissioned American air base. It will support all types of game modes, ranging from the biggest playlists down to the bite-sized encounters.

Article continues after ad

Article continues after ad

Next up on November 18 comes Eastwood, another large-scale map designed with mostly all playstyles in mind. Of note, this one won’t feature jets. Once again set in the US, this map takes us to the hills of Southern California.

Last but not least, presumably to get us in the holiday spirit, an existing map will be reskinned on December 9. Empire State will freeze over, presenting new “environmental threats”, as the official blog teased.

Six new weapons in Season 1

From new assault rifles to sidearms, there’s plenty of extra firepower coming your way as Season 1 rolls on. Six distinct weapons in total are on the docket, and they are as follows:

Article continues after ad

  • October 28 – Rogue Ops update
    • SOR-300SC – Carbine
    • GGH-22 – Sidearm
    • Mini Scout – Sniper Rifle
  • November 18 – California Resistance update
    • DB-12 – Shotgun
    • M357 Trait – Sidearm
  • December 9 – Winter Offensive update
    • Ice Climbing Axe – Melee Weapon

Three new modes in Season 1

Players will be able to equip and level up their gear in a series of new game modes arriving throughout Season 1 as well.

On October 28 comes Strikepoint, a much smaller Battlefield mode designed for 4v4, round-based gameplay. It sounds incredibly similar to Call of Duty’s popular Search and Destroy game type.

Article continues after ad

Next up on November 18, we have Sabotage joining the rotation. A mode built for 8v8 combat, this one is all about pushing the pace. Teams take turns on offense and defense, with a simple goal: Destroy more objectives than your opposition.

Article continues after ad

Last but not least comes a limited-time mode on December 9 known as Ice Lock. Here, gameplay hinges around a Freeze mechanic that will seemingly have enemies locked in place for a brief period, perhaps even vehicles too, but we’ll just have to wait and see.





Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Super Mario Galaxy 1 + 2's ports bring two all-timers to the Switch 2, but I wish Nintendo made that just a little easier to celebrate
Game Reviews

Super Mario Galaxy 1 + 2’s ports bring two all-timers to the Switch 2, but I wish Nintendo made that just a little easier to celebrate

by admin


While Super Mario Galaxy has appeared on Nintendo Switch before, via 2020’s Super Mario 3D All-Stars, this week’s re-release is still momentous. For one, 3D All-Stars was bizarrely only for sale for a limited time – so this will be the first time this game has a ‘standard’, ever-available Switch version. More importantly, this is the first time that Galaxy 2 is on Switch, meaning we now have one of gaming’s finest duologies reunited and available on modern hardware. All of this is great news.

Super Mario Galaxy and Super Mario Galaxy 2

  • Developer: Nintendo
  • Publisher: Nintendo
  • Platform: Played on Nintendo Switch 2
  • Availability: Out 2nd October on Nintendo Switch and Switch 2

Having spent a fair chunk of time with each of the new ports, I’m looking forward to an inevitably reignited debate about which of these two games is better. The rare Nintendo direct sequel, Galaxy 2 is doubtless more refined, tightly organized to push its best ideas early and hard before offering up bold experimentation and fiendish late-game challenges. But that game can only exist because of the original Galaxy – experimental, charming, and wildly atmospheric.

The two form a fascinating one-two punch in this sense. Take the core structure of the games: Galaxy goes all-in on breezy hangouts in an attractive and story-rich but relatively inconsequential hub world. Galaxy 2 jettisons that for a very simple hub with a dialed-back narrative. The first title generally channels the levels of Super Mario 64, with multiple run-throughs and the like – Galaxy 2 embraces more of a linearity reminiscent of Mario’s 2D outings, in turn allowing for more attempts at joyous one-off level design spectacle.

Image credit: Nintendo / Eurogamer

Anyway, I digress. The funny thing about writing about a new release of games such as these is that there’s little point in litigating about the quality of the work. These are undeniably classics. The march of time is not going to change that for the Galaxies any more than it has for the very first Super Mario Bros. With that said, there are curious wrinkles in how these titles play that are only now visible because our minds have been collectively rewired by Odyssey – ways in which you realise Odyssey’s physics are slightly superior, its narrative waffling better delivered, and the game’s visual identity more refined. I feel if you showed that trio to somebody who had never seen them before, they’d easily identify which game is the newest – but none of this takes away from the brilliance of the Galaxy games.

What is more important, then, is the quality of the port. And it’s, you know… it’s fine, right? We know that Nintendo can port over GameCube and Wii games well enough to new hardware. Titles like the 3D Mario games have an art style that ages and scales exceptionally well, too. There was a time when this primarily benefited emulation enthusiasts who were running Wii or 3DS Mario games at much higher resolutions – but now, Nintendo can also reap such benefits first-hand.

Watch on YouTube

Both games run at 1080p on Nintendo Switch and 4K on the Switch 2. Things like the user interface have been tidied up, and everything is smooth. It’s nice, and from that perspective doubtlessly the new definitive way to play these games. I’m less enamored with the control setup, however.

The Mario Galaxy games were built as system-defining, hardware-shifting tentpoles for the Wii, and so they ooze that 2006 energy. The menus are all designed for the pointer interface, for instance – all great big buttons and the like. These of course can be navigated more traditionally and the UI has been subtly adjusted, but the design hasn’t fundamentally changed. The same is true of the game proper, which assumes you’re playing with a Wii Remote and a nunchuck – your right hand free to point at the screen to pick up or fire off starbits, or in Galaxy 2 to interact with the environment using Yoshi’s tongue.

You probably sense where this is going. If you want to play these games in handheld mode, or with a Pro Controller – in a more traditional way, more reminiscent of Odyssey – the act of controlling all of Mario’s skillset becomes uncharacteristically hard work. Some mechanics naturally fade to the background, which naturally is a shame. On the other hand, the Joy-Con is not a Wii remote. The gyroscopic-style cursor control is not as natural or as immediate as a sensor-powered pointer.

Image credit: Nintendo

Image credit: Nintendo

Image credit: Nintendo / Eurogamer

Image credit: Nintendo

Again, it’s fine and you do get used to it. You’ll gradually dial into a ‘zone’ where it becomes more natural over time, too. Still, it’s undeniable that this isn’t as intuitive or as good as on the Wii. I’m reminded of 3D All-Stars and its version of Super Mario Sunshine, which without the GameCube controller’s analogue triggers works just fine but is nevertheless somewhat compromised. In that case, support for the triggers was later patched in – but obviously, there’s no Wii Remote support on Switch, so that’s impossible here. What we have is what we’re going to get.

There’s also a sadly missed opportunity here, which is in the lack of mouse controls. The Switch 2 might not have a proper pointer, but it does have that going for it – but it’s unused! Or, well, not exactly. In a classic baffling Nintendo move, the Joy-Con 2 mouse is supported for the second player in the co-star mode, where a second player can join in the fun in a limited way – but the mouse can’t be used in any form when playing solo. It was probably deemed too awkward, given how your right hand also needs to liberally use the analogue stick to control the camera (though this is less important in this game, as the originals lacked camera control in the first place) and of course use those all-important action buttons. At the same time, I could easily see a scenario where a split Joycon player might seamlessly transition to temporary mouse control for pointer-intensive moments. No such luck.

I’d be more inclined to accept all of this without comment, by the way, if these were particularly cheap re-releases. At £34 individually and almost sixty quid for the pair, however, I’d expect every stop to be pulled out and a bit more bespoke tailoring to fit this Wii experience to the Switch machines. The one thing these joyous games aren’t remotely is cynical – but these releases might just be, a bit.

Image credit: Nintendo / Eurogamer

It has to be said that Nintendo has made smart changes, too. Assist Mode is lovely, and makes the elements of these games that did get surprisingly punishing a bit more accessible without damping the ‘core’ experience. The visual improvements are good, the new storybook stuff is cute, and while the soundtrack and amiibo support additions are basic, I appreciate them nevertheless.

So now I sit back, and scroll up, and think to myself: Oh. That’s a lot of negative words about perfectly fine ports of two of the greatest games of all time. And I suppose that’s the thing: these games are so good, and were so perfect in their original forms (we’re talking a pair of Eurogamer tens – remember those? – and a Eurogamer Game of the Generation) that to some extent all one is left with is nitpicks, frustrations, and unfavorable comparisons to near-perfect originals and an even-better-still successor in Odyssey.

And that’s the rub, really. The only thing one with any real light in their heart can do is to fully and loudly say that these games deserve to be played. They are always and forever an instant recommendation and a vital piece of platform gaming history. These ports are solid enough, and the best new, easily accessible way to play these games. So of course it’s a recommendation, in the end. I just wish the journey of my feelings to get to that recommendation were a little less complicated.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
TACEO and Aztec to bring Private Shared State to Ethereum
NFT Gaming

TACEO and Aztec to bring Private Shared State to Ethereum

by admin



TACEO and Aztec Foundation are teaming up to create a Private Shared State, an encrypted environment that supports updates, multi-computation and auditing under one private decentralized roof.

Summary

  • TACEO and Aztec Foundation are partnering to bring Private Shared State into Ethereum.
  • PSS differs from existing MPC solutions by allowing shared, persistent private states on-chain, with a focus on developer usability through TACEO’s coNoir toolkit.
  • TACEO claims its system is built with post-quantum security in mind, using information-theoretically secure protocols and exploring hash-based proof systems.

TACEO, the company behind Worldcoin’s encrypted iris-scanning network and the largest known multiparty computation database, has partnered with the Aztec Foundation, nonprofit organization that supports the Aztec Network, to create a Private Shared State on Ethereum.

The partnership claims it would allow multiple parties to verify blockchain transactions and contracts, without exposing the underlying information or relying on a centralized entity to verify them. It combines TACEO’s collaborative computation abilities with Aztec’s privacy-first Layer 2 on Ethereum (ETH).

TACEO CEO Lukas Helminger, tells crypto.news that the PSS serves to extend the capabilities of multiparty computation or MPC to new areas that it was previously limited to. The system will enable multiple users to collaborate on encrypted data sets over which computation is done.

“In brief, PSS lets multiple parties jointly maintain and compute over a single, shared piece of private state, and then commit that state on-chain with a proof that’s publicly verifiable,” said Helminger.

Through the collaboration, Aztec developers will be able to use enhanced tooling that supports complex and collaborative computing. Developers will be able to perform general-purpose computation on encrypted data from different sources, yielding functionality and privacy beyond what web2 is capable of.

The PSS is poised to facilitate a range of different use cases, including trustless financial markets, collaborative AI model training, cheat-proof on-chain gaming and data sovereignty frameworks.

TACEO CEO: ‘Our approach is different’

TACEO CEO Lukas Helminger explains how the Private Shared State differs from run-of-the-mill multiparty computation solutions as it allows for arbitrary computation on encrypted data, as well as the possibility to generate a proof of correctness of that computation.

According to Helminger, this approach creates a “persistent state that no single entity can access, but can be updated over time,” enabling multiple parties to jointly maintain and compute over the same private state. This sets PSS apart from ZKMPC, which he said focuses on one-off secure computations without providing an on-chain state model that contracts can reference.

The company also distinguishes its work from NuCypher’s threshold cryptography framework.

Whereas NuCypher focuses more on traditional use cases for MPC or threshold cryptography to allow signing, decryption delegation and threshold access, PSS goes beyond that by providing shared, updatable private state with on-chain proofs.

Another main difference that sets PSS apart from other solutions is its emphasis on usability for developers.

“Our approach is different: we’re shaping MPC, coSNARKs and PSS into tools that any developer can pick up to build apps, with confidentiality,” Helminger said.

Through its coNoir toolkit, the company hopes to make integration seamless for those already using Noir, Aztec’s zero-knowledge programming language.

“Traditional MPC libraries often came out of academia, which meant they were powerful but not practical. With coNoir, we aim to make it trivial for developers already using coNoir to extend their applications into an MPC and PSS environment,” stated Helminger.

In terms of safety and security, Helminger claims that the protocols that the network is built upon have gone through years of peer-reviewed research and that it is currently undergoing a security assessment, with regular external audits planned once the system stabilizes.

“By the very nature of MPC, no single node learns the plaintext, and confidentiality holds as long as the threshold of colluding nodes is not exceeded,” he said.

How does the Private Shared State fare against quantum computing?

Many experts view quantum computing as a potential threat to cryptocurrency as it evolves at a rapid pace. In fact, many have predicted that with enough power it could one day break Bitcoin’s encryption and gain access to wallets, an event often referred to as “Q Day.”

Most recently, Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko said that there is currently a 50-50 possibility that in five years time, quantum computers will be strong enough to crack the cryptographic safeguards protecting Bitcoin wallets.

When asked how TACEO and Aztec’s PSS will fare against the threat of quantum computing, TACEO CEO Lukas Helminger said that some parts of the stack, such as secret sharing within MPC environments are “already information-theoretically secure and naturally post-quantum.”

“Where quantum risk does come in, such as, in certain proof systems, we’re actively exploring post-quantum secure approaches, including hash-based ZK,” said Helminger.

He explained that the research team working on the project has had prior experience working on post-quantum standards, therefore they are gearing up the system with a clear migration path in mind as the technology continues to evolve.

“We take a crypto-agile approach: the system is designed so we can migrate components to post-quantum alternatives as they mature. For example, where today’s SNARKs rely on elliptic-curve assumptions, we’re already experimenting with hash-based proof systems,” he said.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Caroline Pham, acting chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Crypto Trends

Australia Looks To Bring Crypto Under Financial Services Framework With New Draft Legislation

by admin



The Australian treasury revealed a new draft proposal for crypto firms in the country, requiring them to hold licenses and be treated as financial products.

The proposal would require crypto firms to hold financial service licenses, effectively bringing them under the wing of the country’s securities regulator, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

Digital asset platforms (DAPs) and tokenized custody platforms (TCPs) will fall under the same bracket as other financial intermediaries, and subject to the same licensing and consumer protection rules.

Daniel Mulino, assistant treasurer, revealed the draft legislation on Thursday. Mulino explained that the plan is to bring crypto under existing financial services rules.

“The final legislation will introduce a new framework for digital asset businesses in Australia. It will do so by extending existing financial services laws but in a targeted way,” Mulino said.

The treasury has opened the draft legislation for consultation. The consultation window is open until Oct. 24, 2025.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Shiba Inu (SHIB) Spikes 200% in Volume, But What Does It Bring to Price?
GameFi Guides

Shiba Inu (SHIB) Spikes 200% in Volume, But What Does It Bring to Price?

by admin


According to data from CryptoQuant, Shiba Inu (SHIB) is having one of its most erratic weeks in recent memory, with exchange inflows rising by almost 200%. According to the most recent metrics, mean inflows to exchanges more than doubled from levels earlier in the week on Sept. 24, reaching nearly 2.94 billion SHIB. Concerns regarding the short-term price stability of SHIB are raised by the fact that an increase in tokens being transferred to centralized platforms frequently indicates an increase in selling pressure.

Symmetrical SHIB triangle broken

On the daily chart, SHIB broke out of a symmetrical triangle structure and is currently trading at about $0.00001221, consolidating just below its key moving averages. The technical picture is still shaky, even though the price is currently holding fairly steady. The 50-day and 200-day EMAs are still acting as ceilings on the rise, and SHIB has not been able to break above resistance levels around $0.00001300–$0.00001350. A surge in inflows makes the outlook more complicated.

SHIB/USDT Chart by TradingView

This kind of on-chain activity frequently comes before significant sell-offs, especially when it occurs in tandem with technical malfunctions. If exchange inflows keep increasing, SHIB may test deeper support close to $0.00001150; if it fails, losses could accelerate to $0.00001000. But not every indication is negative. The token may not yet be oversold, as indicated by SHIB’s daily RSI staying in neutral territory.

SHIB volumes spike

Additionally, volume increases that do not immediately result in price breakdowns can occasionally be interpreted as a sign that buyers are absorbing selling pressure, which could lay the groundwork for a recovery. Notwithstanding the inflows, a recovery toward $0.00001350 is still possible if SHIB can maintain above the $0.00001200 level.

Exchange inflows are flashing red, but price resilience is offering a glimmer of hope as SHIB finds itself at a crossroads. According to the inflow data, sellers may soon take control and push SHIB closer to annual lows if bulls are unable to retake short-term resistances.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Bottled water. (congerdesign/Pixabay)
Crypto Trends

Ripple, Securitize Bring RLUSD to BlackRock and VanEck Tokenized Funds

by admin



Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin is being integrated into tokenized money-market funds from BlackRock and VanEck, giving holders of the products a direct redemption path into on-chain liquidity.

Through a new smart contract on Securitize’s platform, investors in BlackRock’s BUIDL and VanEck’s VBILL funds can now swap their shares for RLUSD on demand, creating what Ripple calls a 24/7 stablecoin off-ramp for tokenized treasuries.

The move positions RLUSD as a settlement layer for real-world assets (RWA) while broadening its institutional footprint.

Jack McDonald, Ripple’s SVP of Stablecoins, said in a prepared statement thathe tie-up “is a natural next step as we continue to bridge traditional finance and crypto,” framing RLUSD as regulatory-compliant and enterprise-grade.

RLUSD — backed 1:1 with liquid reserves and issued under a New York DFS trust charter — has climbed past $700 million in circulation since launching last year. Ripple has been pushing its use in cross-border payments and DeFi pools, while now anchoring it to institutional RWA platforms.

The Securitize tie-in also sets up RLUSD for deployment on the XRP Ledger, giving Ripple a dual push of a regulatory-compliant stablecoin issuance on one side, and DeFi-facing usability on the other.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
XRP
GameFi Guides

Here’s The XRP ‘Perpetual Buyer’ That Could Bring about $700 Million In Buying Pressure Yearly

by admin


Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

A new product was launched at XRP Seoul 2025, designed to act as a constant buyer of XRP. At the event, Midas and Interop Labs announced the start of mXRP, a tokenized version of XRP that can earn yield while staying fully transferable. The model recycles returns back into XRP, which experts say could generate intense yearly buying pressure and help support the market. 

mXRP Launch To Create Constant Demand For XRP

The mXRP token is created as an ERC-20 asset on the XRP Ledger’s EVM sidechain, allowing holders to use it across various DeFi platforms. Unlike other XRP yield products that keep funds inside closed accounts, mXRP is transferable and can move across lending pools, liquidity venues, and other platforms.

The primary goal of mXRP is to utilize XRP tokens that are currently unused and integrate them into active DeFi strategies. Holders can earn a base yield of 6–8%, with all returns paid directly in XRP. The launch on stage at XRP Seoul 2025, before more than 3,000 XRP holders, is closely watched by the audience, demonstrating the high interest in this first-of-its-kind product for XRP. 

mXRP stands out from other yield products. While companies like Flare, MoreMarkets, Bitrue, and Doppler already offer XRP yield accounts, those services keep funds locked in one place. Midas and Interop Labs believe that the open and portable design of mXRP allows it to grow faster and serve more uses. They also argue that this launch could mark the beginning of a new phase for DeFi on the XRP Ledger, where yields are currently very low, often below 1%.

‘Perpetual Buyer’ Model Set To Inject $700 Million Of Yearly Pressure

The unique part of mXRP is its “perpetual buyer” design. In this system, the yield collected from different strategies is recycled and reinvested in buying XRP, and the holders receive it directly. Axelar co-founder Georgios Vlachos explains that this creates a loop where the product becomes a constant buyer of XRP.

As more users adopt mXRP, the impact on the XRP market could be massive. Should the assets under management reach $10 billion by 2026, the model could generate $700 million in yearly buying pressure for the market at a 7% yield. Platforms like Strobe Finance could see liquidity rewards rise above 5% after the launch of mXRP. At the same time, Midas, which already manages over $1.2 billion in tokenized assets, shows that it has the experience to back this type of product.

Even though access will not be open in the U.S., U.K., or in sanctioned areas, many view the launch at XRP Seoul 2025 as a crucial step forward. With its “perpetual buyer” structure, the product could alter the way demand for XRP develops in the years to come. 

Token price suppressed by bears | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL.E, chart from Tradingview.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
The Gathering' Draft May Bring More Crossover Sets
Gaming Gear

The Gathering’ Draft May Bring More Crossover Sets

by admin


Spider-Man has just come to Magic: The Gathering, but the card game already has other crossovers planned, and different ways to implement them.

Just before the latest Universes Beyond set came to shelves, Magic senior game designer Corey Bowen broke down the new Pick Two Draft, a four-person format (as opposed to the standard eight) which sees players take two cards from their Play Boosters and pass them to their left and right. Bowen explained the developers chose this new way to play as away to help casual players coming into Magic and those linking up in four-person groups. But it also has the added bonus of facilitating smaller Universes Beyond sets in the future.

“How could we represent an amazing corner of the Marvel Universe without trying to fill over 300 card concepts?” wrote Bowen. “If we were focusing only on Spider-Man, there are tons of great stories, characters, and depth, but not enough to meet the demanding threshold of a full Magic set. We also believed solving this problem now would allow us to consider more partnerships that may not to fill the shoes of a full Magic set.”

That Bowen calls out “more partnerships” as a reason for Pick Two is interesting, since Magic: The Gathering has been pushing Universes Beyond collaborations hard in recent years with full sets based on major IP like Final Fantasy and Doctor Who. Days ago, we also learned New York Comic-Con will have a panel announcing a new team-up between Magic and Nicklodeon, its third following ones between Spongebob Squarepants (for Secret Lair) and Avatar: The Last Airbender. Not every Nick IP is as big now as they were back in the day (or are that deep), potentially providing a perfect use case for Pick Two.

The Nickelodeon x Magic panel will be held on October 10, where we’ll find out what it is and just how big. And if it’s not this that gets the Pick Two treatment, we’ll eventually learn what Universes Beyond crossover it’ll be.

Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
16:9 Melbourne, Australia (Daniel Bone/Pixabay)
Crypto Trends

Grvt Raises $19M to Bring Privacy and Scale to Onchain Finance

by admin



Grvt (pronounced “gravity”), a decentralized exchange (DEX) focused on privacy in on-chain finance, has raised $19 million in Series A funding.

The round was co-led by ZKsync, its foundational technology partner, along with Further Ventures, EigenCloud (formerly EigenLayer) and 500 Global, the company announced via email on Thursday.

Built on the ZKsync Validium L2, Grvt uses zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs to ensure transactions inherit Ethereum-level security while keeping trade details private and settlement costs low. The company says this architecture addresses long-standing barriers to mainstream adoption of on-chain finance: privacy, scalability and accessibility.

ZK technology is a cryptographic method in which one party can demonstrate to another that a certain piece of information is true, without revealing anything about said information. This is an important facet of blockchain-based finance as it allows users to verify transactions and transfers without revealing anything about the sender, receiver, amount.

“Privacy is uncompromising for the future of on-chain trading and investing,” said co-founder and CEO Hong Yea, adding that Grvt aims to set the standard for how zero-knowledge cryptography powers financial markets.

The raise comes amid a resurgence in Ethereum activity, with August’s on-chain volume topping $320 billion, its highest since mid-2021. Backers see Grvt as a potential liquidity hub for a trillion-dollar on-chain finance market, with applications spanning cross-exchange vaults, cross-chain interoperability, real-world assets, and structured options, according to the announcement.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Close