Tag:

Break

Exchange Review August
Crypto Trends

Anchored Above $0.251, Traders Watching $0.264 Break

by admin



Dogecoin swung through a 5% range before fading late, with institutional liquidation flows breaking support in the closing session. A defended $0.251 floor and rebound toward $0.264 showed resilience, but a sharp 33M-volume selloff at 03:55 punctured momentum and left price consolidating near $0.261.

News Background

DOGE traded between $0.251 and $0.264 from Oct. 2, 04:00 to Oct. 3, 03:00, posting a 2.7% net gain after navigating both intraday correction and recovery phases. Analysts pointed to institutional desks as the dominant flow driver, with SBI and ETF speculation keeping broader bid interest intact. Technical specialists highlighted an emerging ascending megaphone pattern and hidden bullish divergence, suggesting potential upside remains despite short-term sell pressure.

Price Action Summary

  • DOGE dipped to $0.251 at 14:00 before rebounding to $0.264 by 21:00.
  • Selloff volumes peaked at 666M tokens during the downturn; the rebound phase drew 414M.
  • Support formed at $0.251–$0.253, while resistance consolidated at $0.262–$0.264.
  • In the final hour, DOGE slipped from $0.261 to $0.260 on a 33.1M spike, signaling institutional liquidation.

Technical Analysis

Key support remains anchored at $0.251–$0.253, where buyers repeatedly stepped in. Resistance is firm at $0.262–$0.264, with rejection pressure capping rebounds. The structure shows both resilience and fragility: late-session liquidation prints broke short-term support, yet broader patterns — including an ascending megaphone and bullish divergence on momentum indicators — suggest potential continuation toward $0.34 if buyers reassert above $0.262.

What Traders Are Watching?

  • Whether DOGE can stabilize above $0.260 after late-session liquidation.
  • A retest of $0.251–$0.253 support if selling persists into U.S. hours.
  • Confirmation of bullish divergence and megaphone breakout setups, with upside targets toward $0.34.
  • ETF speculation flows that could re-anchor meme-coin bids across DOGE and SHIB.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Gold's Rare Red Day Allows BTC to Advance
Crypto Trends

When Could Bitcoin (BTC) Price Break New Record Highs? Watch Out for Gold

by admin



Stocks printed fresh records and gold is on a tear crossing $3,900, but the last leg higher in traditional markets left bitcoin BTC$117,536.67 behind.

The largest crypto, often touted as digital gold, has been stuck in a $100,000–$120,000 range for nearly three months after setting new highs in July and August.

The lag fits a pattern. Over the past couple of years, gold and bitcoin have taken turns: when gold breaks out, bitcoin tends to consolidate; when gold cools, BTC often resumes the advance.

BTC versus gold (TradingView)

From January into April, BTC plunged about 30% while gold kicked off its next leg, rising roughly 28% to $3,500 at the height of the global tariff tantrum. Gold then stalled into August, and bitcoin took the baton, rallying about 60% from trough to peak to notch fresh records.

Bitcoin to catch up when gold tires

“Gold likes low rates and a weak economy, whereas bitcoin likes them firm,” said Charlie Morris, chief investment officer at ByteTree, in a recent report. “Because bitcoin likes a super strong economy, and low rates are associated with economic slumps.” He added that the BTC–gold relationship is loose: the 90-day correlation has averaged around 0.1 — “basically zero.”

Right now, gold is in a lockout rally toward $4,000, up about 17% across a seven-week winning streak. Bitcoin, meanwhile, is still ranging below $120,000.

If the recent rhythm holds, a pause in gold, or even a sideways drift, could be the tell for BTC’s next break out of the range and another run at records.

“The good news for bitcoin is that sooner or later, gold will get tired,” Morris said.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Can Google be trusted without a break up?
Gaming Gear

Can Google be trusted without a break up?

by admin


On day three of the two-week remedies trial in the Justice Department’s ad tech case against Google, Judge Leonie Brinkema boiled down the argument to one key issue: trust. Brinkema interrupted testimony from a DOJ expert with a hypothetical: should she issue a strict order modifying Google’s behavior, could it resolve the issues at hand if “you had confidence that Google would actually act in complete good faith?”

The question felt particularly pointed, given how the Google trial Brinkema presided over last year unfolded. Over three weeks, the DOJ repeatedly presented examples of Google employees allegedly using chat messages to avoid leaving a paper trail for discovery. Brinkema later said the practice represented “systemic disregard of the evidentiary rules.” While she opted not to sanction Google for its lax approach to preserving evidence, she warned not to take its decision as condoning the behavior.

Soon, Brinkema will decide how hard to crack down on the monopoly that she ruled Google holds in ad tech. That decision may hinge on whether she thinks it will follow the rules this time.

Google’s remedies proposal involves a court order banning specific business practices and requiring it to engage in the ad auction process in ways similar to its rivals. But the DOJ says that leaves it easily capable of monopolizing the market again. The government wants to take power out of Google’s hands altogether by making it spin off ad exchange AdX and open source part of (and possibly even sell) its DFP tool for web publishers.

It’s the second time in just a few months that a judge has faced the question of breaking up Google. In a separate case over Google’s search monopoly, Judge Amit Mehta declined to do so, opting for lower-lift remedies like banning anticompetitive practices and sharing data. The facts that led Mehta to decide against a break up have no bearing on this case, the government argued in its opening statement. Still, Brinkema’s ruling could be an indicator of how widely judges share Mehta’s caution, as more cases against Big Tech companies roll toward a trial.

“The devil is in the details”

The DOJ was still in the midst of its case-in-chief on Friday, but Google’s attorneys were already driving at their core argument: that the government is underselling how difficult and risky its asks are. Google advertising executive Tim Craycroft testified that the DOJ’s proposals were “naive” and “incoherent.” This line of thinking seemed to land with the judge by mid-week. “The devil is in the details,” she said during the testimony of Jonathan Weissman, the DOJ’s expert witness on the technical feasibility of a break up. After he compared changing Google’s ad tech tools to changing tires on a car, Brinkema noted that a change to snow tires could result in a “bumpier” ride for the user.

But during Craycroft’s testimony, Brinkema appeared to entertain an even more extreme option the government hadn’t asked for: shutting down AdX altogether. This was apparently something Google itself considered within the past few years in an analysis it called “Project Monday,” Craycroft said.

“Why is that not a very simple and elegant solution?” Brinkema asked, after Craycroft noted that another Big Tech company could buy AdX and create its own monopoly. Though several ad exchanges exist today, the court found they’ve been denied a level playing field because of tactics like reserving full real-time bidding access to Google’s huge advertiser base through its own tools. Publishers testified in the liability trial that made it nearly impossible to leave, even though AdX was charging a supracompetitive take rate of 20 percent on transactions. Craycroft told the judge that deprecating AdX could be an elegant solution, but that would also get rid of other helpful features in the product.

Brinkema made clear she wants to learn what’s actually possible, as she considers options for leveling the playing field without harming publishers and advertisers who rely on Google products.

Google found a so-called business divestiture of AdX would be feasible within two years, Craycroft said, including offloading IP, moving customer contracts, and providing reference code to guide the buyer through duplicating product functions in its own systems. But he stressed Google couldn’t realistically provide source code guaranteed to work in an unknown buyer’s tech stack, as the DOJ requests. Former Facebook capacity engineer Goranka Bjedov, who helped migrate Instagram and WhatsApp during their acquisitions, testified that the reference source code would be sufficient for a full migration. If Brinkema finds a divestiture is possible, she’ll have to decide if she trusts Google enough not to force one.

Even after helping Google’s attorneys craft their remedies proposals, Craycroft told DOJ attorney Matthew Huppert that he could not commit to lowering AdX’s 20 percent take rate, which the judge had ruled to be above a competitive level, and said a tie between DFP and access to AdX real-time bidding, a sticking point for publishers, was “just how the product was built.”

The answer to Brinkema’s question about trust wasn’t necessarily reassuring for Google. Robin Lee, the Harvard economist she asked, said the problem was how many different ways Google could get around the intentions behind a court order. Lee said there’s an almost unpredictably exhaustive list of methods for tilting the scales in Google’s favor, and it’s got every incentive to take them.

Longtime Google critics were disappointed after Mehta’s ruling didn’t include a breakup. If Brinkema reaches a similar conclusion, The Trade Desk Chief Revenue Officer Jed Dederick testified, “I think there will be a sense that they got away with it.”

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

  • Close

    Lauren Feiner

    Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All by Lauren Feiner

  • AntitrustClose

    Antitrust

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Antitrust

  • GoogleClose

    Google

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Google

  • PolicyClose

    Policy

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Policy

  • ReportClose

    Report

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Report

  • TechClose

    Tech

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Tech



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
shoemaker in mushroom kayak
Esports

Russian freediver plunges 413 feet on a single breath to break world record

by admin



Russian freediver Alexey Molchanov has set a new world record after diving 413 feet on a single breath at the AIDA Freediving World Championships in Cyprus.

Molchanov, 37, is widely considered the greatest freediver in history. He has broken more than 30 world records and is the son of legendary diver Natalia Molchanova, who set 42 records of her own before her death in 2015.

This latest dive was particularly grueling. Molchanov held his breath for 4 minutes and 32 seconds as he descended into near-total darkness, battling extreme cold, crushing water pressure, and the ever-present risk of blackout during ascent. He broke his own record of 410 feet, set just last year.

Article continues after ad

Breaking records in the deep

Molchanov competed in the constant weight bi-fins category at the 2025 AIDA Freediving World Championships, which requires divers to descend and ascend using only fins without pulling on the rope. His headlamp and safety line were the only guides in the Mediterranean waters off Limassol, Cyprus.

Article continues after ad

He later described the toughest parts of the dive on Instagram, noting the “thermocline drop” when water temperature plunged from 77°F to 54°F within seconds, as well as the delicate pressure management needed to avoid lung injury at depth. Molchanov also highlighted the riskiest stretch: the final 100 feet of ascent, where most blackouts occur due to expanding air in the lungs and dwindling oxygen.

Article continues after ad

To officially secure the record, Molchanov had just 15 seconds after resurfacing to complete a strict protocol: remove his gear, give a hand signal, and say “I’m OK.” With the record validated, his 413-foot descent now stands as the deepest constant weight bi-fins dive ever achieved.

For perspective, the dive is longer than a football field and a half, roughly equal to the height of a 41-story building, all completed on a single breath of air.

Article continues after ad



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Wall Street’s RWA bet could break on crypto infrastructure
Crypto Trends

Wall Street’s RWA bet could break on crypto infrastructure

by admin



Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

Real-world asset tokenization has surged to $27 billion, making it the fastest-growing corner of crypto. But while headlines boast about trillion-dollar potential, most platforms still fall short of the institutional standards needed to unlock real capital. The next phase of tokenization isn’t about hype — it’s about building rails institutions can actually trust.

Summary

  • RWA tokenization grew 118% YoY to $27B, led by BlackRock’s $1.7B BUIDL fund.
  • Institutions like Franklin Templeton and KKR are testing tokenization, but major allocators remain cautious.
  • Current gaps include asset commingling, weak auditability, and a lack of regulated custody and insurance.
  • To attract trillions in institutional capital, platforms must embed compliance, real-time audits, and ironclad custodial safeguards from day one.

Real-world asset tokenization is now the fastest-growing segment in crypto, clocking in at $27 billion, a 118% year-over-year surge. In the past year alone, BlackRock’s BUIDL fund crossed $1.7 billion in tokenized U.S. Treasuries, while institutional players like Franklin Templeton, Apollo, and KKR are rushing to tokenize everything from private credit to real estate on-chain. 

The institutional growth has arrived, and now the challenge is clear: RWA platforms must build infrastructure that meets the unique standards of institutional capital if this gold rush is to deliver on its potential for investors and markets alike. When trillions in institutional assets start migrating onto blockchains, the quality of the rails matters for everyone.

As more players rush in, the gap between what is being built and what is actually needed deepens, growing more dangerous. With more at stake than ever, it’s time for platforms to focus on embedding the controls, transparency, and reliability that institutional capital requires. Only by adopting these standards can RWA tokenization deliver lasting benefits for end investors, borrowers, and overall financial stability, unlocking institutional capital at the scale needed to drive this trillion-dollar market. Forward-looking RWA platforms, however, recognize that serving institutions means evolving beyond early crypto playbooks. The next phase is about building the features needed to welcome and safeguard major capital.

The institutional standard: Where RWA infrastructure still falls short

In financial services, there are certain standards that are baseline; for example, client assets must be kept in legally distinct accounts. Meaning that if a custodian fails, the assets are recoverable and protected by regulations that have been used for decades.

On-chain, many RWA platforms still rely on pooled or omnibus wallets, a shortcut that blurs the line between client holdings and platform funds. This approach introduces a systemic risk: if a protocol is compromised, client assets may be mixed in ways that make legal recovery or restitution highly uncertain. On-chain, where such protections are usually absent, commingling turns a technical breach into a potential operational and legal nightmare.

Just as critical is auditability. Blockchain may promise transparency, but for institutional players, visibility without audit‑ready oversight is meaningless, and most RWA platforms still fall short.

It’s no surprise that many traditional hedge fund managers remain hesitant to crypto exposure, due to concerns over auditability and reporting standards, with 76% of those not currently invested in digital assets unlikely to enter the space within the next three years, up from 54% in 2023. Failing to meet these rigorous standards means locking out the very institutional capital poised to transform this market.

If RWA tokenization delivers on its promise, the industry can no longer settle for shortcuts. Infrastructure built for institutions means inherited safeguards, not just innovation. These safeguards include meticulous asset segregation, real-time auditability, and ironclad regulatory compliance, the same protections that have underpinned traditional finance for decades. Without them, institutional allocators will simply not move. This shift is what is needed if the next wave of capital is to be both substantial and sustainable.

Custody and compliance struggles

Behind every major allocation of institutional capital sits a base of regulated custody and insurance. Pension funds and sovereign wealth managers are not going to entrust billions to a browser extension wallet. Instead, institutions expect highly certified custodians (SOC2 or ISO) who provide both regulatory protection and robust insurance protecting clients in case of loss.

In short, while custody infrastructure is steadily improving, and leading providers are showing what’s possible, the broader market still has a way to go. Elevating these standards industry-wide is essential. Without insured, regulated custody at scale, even the most innovative platforms may find doors to major institutional capital remain firmly shut.

The same gap shows up in compliance. DeFi’s promise of permissionless access was once its boldest selling point. This same promise is ringing alarm bells for institutional allocators. Without built-in KYC, AML controls, and whitelisted investor pools, institutional allocators cannot participate — the risk profile is simply untenable. Expanding these frameworks will be key to unlocking broader institutional engagement going forward.

Until RWA platforms give regulated custody, insurance, and compliance the same priority as technical innovation, the sector will be stuck on the sidelines of true institutional finance. For tokenization to scale safely, these core systems must be foundational, or the promise of bringing real-world assets on-chain will not become a market reality.

The rift between headlines and reality

Even as the RWA tokenization market now exceeds $27 billion, the vast majority is held by crypto-native investors, hedge funds, and stablecoin issuers, not by the banks, insurers, or pension funds that move true institutional capital. Among the Fortune 100, only a handful have run tokenization pilots, and even fewer have allocated real balance sheet capital.

While some platforms have ticked off compliance boxes, earned accredited certifications, and landed custody partnerships, most of the industry still faces stiff regulatory scrutiny in the United States. As of today, the SEC continues to press for deeper disclosures, stronger investor protections, and clearer legal structures before it greenlights RWA tokenization for broad investment.

The real test is just beginning

Crypto is now at the same crossroads. The next wave of institutional capital will flow to platforms designed from day one with transparency, real-time auditability, segregated and insured custody, and with compliance woven into every layer. However, these platforms are still the exception, not the rule, at a time when the sector desperately needs robust, institution-ready rails. The few platforms taking a compliance-first approach, embedding safeguards and institution-ready custody from the outset, are the ones best positioned to meet Wall Street’s bar.

And as capital pours in, it’s only getting more selective. Institutional allocators will not move billions onto rails they cannot trust. The next leaders in RWA tokenization will be the ones embedding compliance, auditability, and custodial safeguards into their architecture from day one.

Abdul Rafay Gadit

Abdul Rafay Gadit is the Co-Founder of ZIGChain, a next-generation Layer 1 blockchain protocol created to provide the core infrastructure for real-world financial applications. At ZIGChain, Rafay oversees the development of foundational blockchain components, including the Wealth Management Engine and a $100 million ecosystem fund that supports builders and institutions bringing traditional financial products on-chain. In addition to his role at ZIGChain, Rafay is also the Co-Founder and Chief Financial Officer of Zignaly, a leading Web3-native investment platform that connects everyday investors with top-performing fund managers through blockchain-powered profit sharing.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
A whale leaps out of the sea.
NFT Gaming

The Main Driver Behind BTC’s Break From Global M2, According to Raoul Pal

by admin



Raoul Pal, founder of Global Macro Investor, has drawn attention to a widely circulated chart that compares bitcoin’s (BTC) movements with global M2 money supply.

The chart shows that since early 2023, bitcoin has tended to track global M2 money supply with a consistent 12-week lag, implying that changes in liquidity conditions filter through to crypto markets with a three-month delay.

Based on that model, bitcoin would still be on track to approach $200,000 by the end of 2025 if the correlation were to hold.

However, since July 16, this relationship has broken down. While global M2 has continued to trend higher, reflecting ongoing monetary expansion globally, bitcoin has stalled, moving sideways through the summer despite its historically tight connection to liquidity.

TGA refill plays spoilsport

Pal argues that the break is not a failure of the model but rather the result of actions by the U.S. Treasury through its Treasury General Account (TGA). The TGA is the government’s operating account at the Federal Reserve, used to receive taxes, bond sale proceeds, and other inflows while also funding federal expenditures.

When the Treasury seeks to rebuild this account by issuing more bonds than needed to cover immediate obligations, it effectively drains liquidity from the system, reducing the pool of capital available to risk assets. According to Pal, since July, the Treasury has issued about $500 billion in bonds to replenish the TGA, pushing its balance near $800 billion, a multi-year high.

This large-scale withdrawal of cash has hit liquidity-sensitive assets like crypto the hardest, explaining bitcoin’s sideways action despite rising M2.

Importantly, Pal believes the TGA is now sufficiently replenished, meaning the liquidity drain is likely over and should fade completely by the end of the month. If that happens, liquidity conditions will normalize, and bitcoin’s braoder rally could resume following its M2-driven trajectory upward.

However, to counter Pal’s argument, it is worth noting that tech stocks and gold have continued to set new all-time highs, suggesting that broader risk appetite remains intact.

While the TGA replenishment may have weighed heavily on crypto, the sharper impact could also reflect heavy selling pressure from long-held coins, which helps explain the deviation between bitcoin and global M2.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Louisiana Hands Meta a Tax Break and Power for Its Biggest Data Center
Product Reviews

Louisiana Hands Meta a Tax Break and Power for Its Biggest Data Center

by admin


The agreement sets out hiring timelines that the company must also hit to receive these tax incentives: Meta can receive the highest property tax exemption as long as it hires the equivalent of 300 “full-time” jobs by 2030, 450 by 2032, 475 by 2033 and 500 by December 31, 2034.

Louisiana’s agreements ask for more than some other states’ tax subsidies. According to Good Jobs First, nearly half of state tax subsidies for data centers don’t require any new jobs to be created. But Miller has concerns that the tax breaks were not necessary at all to entice a company as large as Meta. “While everyone likes to avoid taxes, they’re not going to hire people in Richland [Parish] just because they’re going to get a tax break,” Miller says.

Louisiana had already amended a tax rebate to create an exemption for data centers in 2024 to entice Meta; in its latest iteration, it says data centers can receive a full sales tax exemption for equipment purchases in the state as long as they hire 50 full-time jobs and invest at least $200 million by July 1, 2029. A separate contract viewed by WIRED affirms that this applies to the Richland Parish data center, in addition to the PILOT agreement.

Good Jobs First says that at least 10 states have subsidies for data centers that are worth more than $100 million each, and “have suffered estimated losses of $100 million each in tax revenue for data centers,” according to its data. In total, these states forgo more than $3 billion in taxes annually for data centers. Texas revised the cost of its data center subsidy in 2025 from $130 million to $1 billion. In 2024, a pause on data center subsidies was passed in Georgia but vetoed by governor Brian Kemp.

The Franklin Farms site in Holly Ridge, the area of Richland Parish where Meta’s data center is being built, was purchased by Louisiana specifically for economic development projects. In its ground lease with Meta, Louisiana offered the 1,400-acre plot to the company for $12 million, which the lease says was the cost to the state of acquiring and maintaining the land. The lease also says Meta’s $732,000 a year “rent” is “credit toward the Base Purchase Price,” meaning the company will have paid for the property by a little over 16 years into its 30-year lease.

The price for the potential sale would be slightly higher if Meta does not reach minimum hiring and investment thresholds: As an example, the lease says if Meta only spends $4 billion in the state instead of $5 billion, the property would end up costing it $19 million. Louisiana Economic Development reserves the right to reclaim the property if Meta doesn’t invest at least $3.75 billion and hire the equivalent of 225 “full-time” jobs by 2028. When asked if Meta plans to purchase the property, Clayton said, “We’ll keep you updated on our future plans for this site.”

Meta’s presence has already caused land values to jump. A nearby tract of 4,000 acres of land in Holly Ridge is for sale for $160 million, or $40,000 per acre—more than 4.5 times the price paid by Louisiana for the data center’s site.

But there’s also a concern that Meta could delay or abandon the data center project. The PILOT agreement its subsidiary signed with the state says the company’s timeline will depend on “numerous factors outside of the control of the lessee, such as market orientation and demand, competition, availability of qualified laborers to construct and/or weather conditions.”

“My general fear is that too many data centers are being built,” Miller says. “That means some of the data centers are just going to be abandoned by the owners.”

She says in the scenario that Big Tech cuts back investments in data centers, Meta would not even be able to find another buyer. “Essentially, the state will be stuck with this warehouse full of computers,” Miller says.

Update: 9/22/2025, 12:50 PM EDT: Wired has clarified the subhead to reflect how critics perceive the data center.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
A soldier in an icy landscape facing off against two well-armed skeleton enemies while a dragon watches in the background
Product Reviews

This metroidvania based on an old Atari 2600 classic had the audacity to release on the same day as Silksong, but it’s a nice break from Hornet’s hell

by admin



Every week at least a couple of metroidvanias release on Steam, and most remain obscure. Adventure of Samsara, which released on September 4, was more fated to obscurity than most, despite being published by an ascendant Atari. Because September 4 was also the day Silksong released. Few were going to make time for a handsome but orthodox pixel art metroidvania when the joys and indignities of Pharloom beckon.

Except me: I needed a break from Silksong earlier this week, mostly because I was getting my ass kicked, but also because a small detail on the Adventure of Samsara Steam page piqued my interest. This is actually a spiritual sequel of sorts to the 1980 game Adventure, which was probably the most cryptic and sprawling Atari 2600 cart on the market.

Adventure gave me nightmares as a child. Whereas most Atari 2600 games were cheerfully straightforward one-screen arcade games or scrolling shooters, Adventure had designs on being a full-blown, well, adventure, and it displayed some proto-metroidvania qualities to that end.


Related articles

You explore a same-ish labyrinth as a dot, collecting color-coded keys to unlock color-coded doors, avoiding bats and dragons, and using tools—such as a magnet and a bridge—to solve problems. Its austere blocky graphics are to ASCII what Duplo is to Lego, but there’s a quiet inscrutability to it that freaked me out as a kid (as did Secret Quest, another fairly ambitious Atari 2600 adventure game).

Here’s what the original Adventure looked like (via Retro Games Fan):

Atari 2600: Adventure – YouTube

Watch On

After spending around seven hours in Adventure of Samsara, I can confirm that it doesn’t share a hell of a lot in common with its 1980 source material. The closest call-back I can find, the dragons, are coiled in the same way as the old game and similarly color-coded. If you liked Adventure (I highly doubt you ever loved it), then you’re probably not going to feel relief or the frisson of familiarity with this 2025 game. It definitely feels like a case of having a languishing IP fitted to a new game, almost as an afterthought. (Beyond the Ice Palace 2 comes to mind.)

That’s fine (that’s business) but how does Adventure of Samsara stack up as a 2025 exploration platformer? Kinda well, but not brilliantly. As a “Solar Champion” it’s my job to reactivate “a mysterious interdimensional fortress”, which means exploring a big interconnected underground labyrinth full of monsters, traps and those dragons. Along the way I find the usual array of exploration-gratifying power-ups while unlocking shortcuts, save points and fast travel stations.

Image 1 of 5

(Image credit: Atari)(Image credit: Atari)(Image credit: Atari)(Image credit: Atari)(Image credit: Atari)

My Solar Champion is a floaty lil’ fellow (“lil” because Adventure of Samsara feels more zoomed out than most modern platformers) and his actions can’t be canceled. These qualities do not bode well at first, but I did get used to the stiffness of the controls, probably because Samsara isn’t otherwise a very demanding game. My Solar Champion eventually has three weapons—a sword, a bow and a hammer—and the latter two double as traversal and exploration tools, alongside the usual hard-won character upgrades. Yes, there is a double jump.

I was surprised to find that this game kept me up just as late as Silksong has been this past week.

What I like about Adventure of Samsara is its atmosphere. Yes, it blends fantasy and sci-fi in a pretty familiar way, but the retro-futuristic synth soundtrack is evocatively subtle. It clearly has designs on channeling the 1980s, but it does so in a quiet, nearly plaintive way that’s quite at odds with the nowadays suffocating banality of synthwave.

The other thing I liked about Samsara, especially compared to the 30-odd hours I’ve spent in Silksong, is how exploration-forward it is. There are bosses, but they’re not especially hard, and once you’ve beaten them you can look forward to big chunks of just nosing around. At first this exploration is done tentatively, as the combat is pretty rote and repetitive: attack, dash back, attack, dash back. But once my Solar Champion has some crisper moves and more effective weapons, the exploration becomes freewheeling and engaging. I was surprised to find that this game kept me up just as late as Silksong has been this past week.

(Image credit: Atari)

I also came to appreciate the pixel art, which was a bit of an obstacle for me at first. The world is coherent and carefully illustrated, but the enemy sprites kinda look like something you’d see in uh, Siralim. They’re barely animated—they just blob around. But this culminates in Samara having an interesting primitive quality that oddly reminded me of Barbuta from UFO 50.

Will Silksong signal the end of the charming, humble indie metroidvania? Are these games now doomed to be big budget affairs designed to sap mindshare for weeks going and months? What I love about the genre is that the vast majority of its purveyors—the ones making games you find on Steam with less than 50 reviews—feel like the work of joyful hobbyists, a tradition that runs from Cave Story through to stuff like Astalon.

Adventure of Samsara definitely belongs to that tradition, despite having a 40-odd year old IP attached to it. Yes, it has rough edges, but the next time you want to slide into a mysterious, enveloping metroidvania that doesn’t want you to suffer mercilessly, I’d recommend giving it a look. Maybe also check out Zexion.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Decrypt logo
GameFi Guides

Dogecoin and Solana Look Poised to Break September Crypto Curse: Analysis

by admin



In brief

  • Dogecoin surged 11% and Solana 10 % in the last week, defying seasonal crypto trends
  • Federal Reserve is expected to cut rates this week as inflation moderates to 2.9%, which bodes well for risk assets.
  • Users on the prediction market Myriad are signaling growing bullish sentiment. Here’s what the price charts have to say about it.

The crypto market is trying to rewrite the “Red September” playbook, with major altcoins like Dogecoin and Solana finding investors still have an appetite for riskier bets.

The Altcoin Season Index touched 80 points today—the highest it’s been so far in 2025. Meanwhile, the Crypto Fear and Greed Index climbed to 53 points from 39 at the beginning of the month, signaling growing bullish sentiment across the board.

On the normie side of Wall Street, the S&P 500 advanced 0.85% to 6,587.47 and the Nasdaq gained 0.72% to 22,043.07, both hitting record highs, providing a supportive backdrop for risk assets as markets price in an 89% chance of the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates at the September 17 meeting.

The Federal Reserve has kept interest rates between 4.25%-4.50% since December 2024, but markets are now expecting at least a 0.25% cut at the upcoming meeting. On Myriad, a prediction market developed by Decrypt’s parent company Dastan, users place the odds of a 0.25% rate cut at 88%.



Core inflation at 2.9% and unemployment rising to 4.2% in July provide the Fed cover to begin easing, potentially unleashing the roughly $7 trillion sitting in money market funds into risk-on assets, including stocks and crypto.

Here’s what the charts are looking like today:

Dogecoin (DOGE) price: Breaking out—but beware

Dogecoin has been on a roll over the last week, rising by over 11%, which is typically an indicator of retail investments in crypto coming back.

Today, though, appears primed for a correction, with DOGE so far dipping about 5% in the last 24 hours and currently trading for $0.2649.

Dogecoin price data. Image: Tradingview

Despite today’s drop, the technical picture shows strength.

The Relative Strength Index, or RSI, for Dogecoin is at 60, which traders would normally interpret as bullish. RSI measures trading momentum, with readings below 30 signalling oversold territory and above 70 signally overbought. At 60, DOGE is hot, but not yet overbought, meaning traders would expect more upside to come.

The Average Directional Index, or ADX, for DOGE is at 26, which confirms a trending environment. ADX measures trend strength, regardless of direction, on a scale from 0 to 100. ADX readings above 25 tell traders there’s a trend in place, and the recent upward movement is strong enough to be considered directional.

But current price support for the token at around $0.23 shows the current correction underway would lead to more short-term downside, but it isn’t yet cause for alarm for traders.

Exponential moving averages, or EMAs, give traders a sense of price supports and resistances, based on price averages over the short, medium, and long term.

When looking at both the 50-day and 200-day EMAs, Dogecoin is currently trading well above both moving averages, with the gap between them widening. That’s a pattern traders call “bullish divergence,” which typically occurs in strong uptrends. When shorter-term averages pull away from longer-term ones, it signals sustained buying pressure across multiple timeframes.

In terms of price movement, Dogecoin finally broke its bullish symmetrical triangle, first testing support near the the 20-day EMA before climbing back.

Key Levels:

  • Immediate support: $0.25
  • Strong support: $0.22 (psychological level)
  • Immediate resistance: $0.28214 (recent high)
  • Strong resistance: $0.30000 (major psychological barrier)

Solana (SOL) price: What Red September?

Solana may be the standout coin so far is what is historically a bad month for crypto assets.

SOL is up nearly 10% since last Monday, now trading at around $232 with a market cap above $126 billion.

The token today peaked at $244.08 before consolidating at its current levels, falling back to the upper side of an ascending channel that has been in place since early August when the coin entered into “golden cross” territory.

A golden cross happens when the average price of an asset over the last 50 days crosses above the average price over the last 200 days. This is widely interpreted as a strong bullish signal, because it shows prices are accelerating upwards more quickly over time.

Solana price data. Image: Tradingview

Like with DOGE, technical indicators for Solana paint a bullish picture, with a slight warning that a small correction could be in the cards.

SOL’s RSI is at 65, which shows strong buying momentum approaching but not yet reaching overbought territory above 70. The ADX at 33 confirms exceptionally strong trend strength. Readings above 30 indicate a powerful directional move that trend-following traders (and their algorithm setups) typically capitalize on. For swing traders, an ADX this high tells them to continue trading with the trend rather than anticipate reversals, since momentum tends to persist at these levels.

The EMA configuration (the average price of Solana in the last 50 and 200 days) reveals SOL trading decisively above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages. But the Squeeze Momentum indicator, which traders use to determine trends or price compressions before the next big move, is showing a bearish impulse that creates an interesting divergence in the data.

This contradiction between price action and momentum suggests the market is at an inflection point—either momentum will catch up to price (bullish continuation) or price will correct to match momentum (bearish reversal).

In either scenario, we may see a small dip in the immediate future. But the overall picture on SOL remains bullish in the medium to long term.

That bullish sentiment is reflected in the shifting odds on SOL markets on Myriad. Users now believe there’s a 90% chance Solana hits $250 before dropping to $130, up roughly 15% since last week. Myriad users also believe it’s likely Solana hits a new all-time high price above $294 this year, placing those odds at 59%, up from 45% last week.



Key Levels:

  • Immediate support: $218 (current consolidation)
  • Strong support: $207 (support of the channel)
  • Immediate resistance: $244.08 (recent high)
  • Strong resistance: $260.00 (psychological target)

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed by the author are for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, or other advice.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
raul bautista in a gta 6 shootout
Esports

Rockstar break GTA 6 silence with subtle title update

by admin



Rockstar Games have broken their months-long silence on Grand Theft Auto 6 with a slight update to the name of the game that you may have missed.

The Grand Theft Auto developers are notoriously difficult to get new information from. Rockstar hasn’t shown anything off to the public at events like Gamescom or Summer Games Fest for a number of years, and any announcement is on their terms.

They proved that back in May by announcing a delay to Grand Theft Auto 6’s release date. The GTA devs shifted the release from Holiday 2025 to May 26, 2026, and dropped the long-awaited second trailer in the aftermath.

Article continues after ad

Since then, Rockstar have gone back to being ultra secretive about Grand Theft Auto 6. They’ve not even dropped a mention about it in GTA Online. However, they have broken their silence.

Subtle GTA 6 title change mentioned by Rockstar

As spotted by Rockstar Intel, the Grand Theft Auto developers posted a job listing for a Lead Software Engineer in Data Engineering at Rockstar New York.

Article continues after ad

In the listing, the game developers note that their upcoming title “will be the largest game launch in history.” That is obvious, but they also referred to the game as GTA 6 for the first time. 

Article continues after ad

“With the continued growth of Grand Theft Auto Online and the upcoming release of Grand Theft Auto 6,” the listing reads. As Rockstar Intel points out, the developers have regularly used Grand Theft Auto VI to this point, not the number six. They have also just referred to the game as “a new Grand Theft Auto.”

They also noted that it could very well be a mistake from whichever recruiter posted the listing for Rockstar. Yet, you would assume that it would at least be looked over with a fine-tooth comb because of how rabid Grand Theft Auto fans are.

Article continues after ad

It’s not like Rockstar are going to wedge a mention of Vice City or even Jason and Lucia into the title anytime soon, but the slight tweak is noteworthy.

Article continues after ad



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Close