Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Tag:

bans

french kick streamer jean pormanove
Esports

Kick bans streamers involved in Jean Pormanove broadcasts as France vows “justice”

by admin August 20, 2025



Kick has responded to the death of French streamer Jean Pormanove by banning co-streamers involved in his controversial broadcasts.

On August 18, 46-year-old Raphaël Graven, better known online as Jean Pormanove, died in his sleep while streaming on Kick.

In the days leading up to his death, he was reportedly subjected to “ten days and nights of torture” from fellow streamers Naruto and Safine. The alleged abuse included extreme violence, sleep deprivation, and forced ingestion of toxic products.

Article continues after ad

A day later, French authorities opened a judicial investigation. Clara Chappaz, France’s minister for digital affairs and AI, said Pormanove had been “humiliated and mistreated for months live on Kick” and criticized the platform’s lack of intervention.

Viral clips circulating on social media show Pormanove being hit, strangled, and shot at with paintball guns while live on stream.

Instagram/jeanpormanove

Kick issues bans and launches social media review

Kick’s French account has now confirmed that all streamers who participated in the broadcasts have been banned while the company conducts its own internal investigation.

Article continues after ad

Article continues after ad

“We are committed to fully cooperating with the authorities in this process,” the platform said.

The company also announced it had ended its collaboration with its former French social media agency after facing backlash for posts that used images of Pormanove to promote merchandise. Kick says it is conducting a full review of its French operations to prevent similar incidents.

“Our priority is to protect creators and ensure a safer environment on Kick,” the statement concluded.

Article continues after ad

France promises justice after deadly Kick stream

The response has not silenced critics. Sarah El Haïry, France’s High Commissioner for Children, condemned Kick for failing to step in earlier.

“Platforms have an immense responsibility in regulating online content so that our children are not exposed to violent content,” she wrote on X.

Meanwhile, one of Pormanove’s accused abusers, Owen ‘Naruto’ Cenazandotti, has claimed he is now the victim of a “cyberbullying campaign.”

His lawyer announced that a complaint will be filed with the Paris Prosecutor’s Office’s cyberhate division targeting those who have harassed him since Pormanove’s death.

Article continues after ad

Article continues after ad

Instagram/Jean Pormanove

On August 20, Minister Chappaz echoed those statements and confirmed “an investigation is underway into the alleged actions of the streamers following reports by Mediapart, conducted by the Nice judicial police service under various charges.”

“Justice will carry out its work to advance this investigation and to clarify the tragic circumstances of Jean Pormanove’s death… All platforms have the legal responsibility to remove clearly illegal content of which they are aware,” she explained.

“The largest platforms also have the new responsibility to combat systemic risks such as the protection of minors, public health, or the safety of individuals. Investigations are underway regarding some of them.”

Article continues after ad

Kick star Adin Ross has called for “severe consequences” following Pormanove’s death. Ross also said he had spoken with rapper Drake, and together they will cover the streamer’s funeral expenses.

The situation has reignited long-standing concerns about Kick’s moderation policies. While the platform has made efforts to distance itself from controversial content in recent years, French officials are now demanding stronger safeguards in the wake of Pormanove’s death.

Article continues after ad



Source link

August 20, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
US House reportedly bans WhatsApp on government devices
Gaming Gear

US House reportedly bans WhatsApp on government devices

by admin June 23, 2025


US congressional staffers have reportedly been told that they’re no longer allowed to use WhatsApp on government devices. The House of Representatives’ chief administrative officer (CAO) is said to have informed workers on Monday that the app — including the mobile, desktop and web-based versions — is not permitted on House-managed devices.

“The Office of Cybersecurity has deemed WhatsApp a high risk to users due to the lack of transparency in how it protects user data, absence of stored data encryption and potential security risks involved with its use,” the CAO wrote in an email, according to Axios. Microsoft Teams, Wickr, Signal (despite how easy it might be to accidentally invite a reporter to a sensitive group chat), iMessage and FaceTime were reportedly cited as acceptable alternatives, and the CAO reminded workers to be vigilant regarding potential phishing scams.

“We disagree with the House Chief Administrative Officer’s characterization in the strongest possible terms,” Meta spokesperson Andy Stone wrote on X. “We know members and their staffs regularly use WhatsApp and we look forward to ensuring members of the House can join their Senate counterparts in doing so officially. Messages on WhatsApp are end-to-end encrypted by default, meaning only the recipients and not even WhatsApp can see them. This is a higher level of security than most of the apps on the CAO’s approved list that do not offer that protection.”

The step follows limitations on congressional staffers’ use of other apps (including generative AI ones) that the CAO has deemed to be risky. Those include ChatGPT, TikTok, DeepSeek (which some states and federal departments have also banned from government devices) and Microsoft Copilot.



Source link

June 23, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Norway bans new power-intensive crypto mining to conserve electricity
NFT Gaming

Norway bans new power-intensive crypto mining to conserve electricity

by admin June 20, 2025



Norway will temporarily ban the launch of new crypto mining data centers in an effort to reduce energy usage.

Norway is cracking down on energy-intensive crypto mining operations. On Friday, June 20, the Norwegian government announced a temporary ban on new data centers that mine crypto. The ban, which will take effect in August, is intended to curb the significant energy consumption associated with mining activities.

“The Labour Party government has a clear intention to limit the mining of cryptocurrency in Norway as much as possible,” Minister for Digitalization and Public Administration Karianne Tung.

The move is part of an ongoing crackdown on crypto mining in the country. In April, Norway introduced a bill to regulate its data centers, including those involved in crypto mining. Under the proposed law, data centers must register and disclose ownership information. Minister Tung stated plainly that the goal is to “close the door on the projects we do not want.”

Norway becomes a hub for crypto mining

Due to its cheap and abundant electricity, Norway has become a hub for crypto mining—particularly in the northern regions, where energy and real estate costs are even lower. According to Webopedia, Norway contributes 2% of the global Bitcoin (BTC) mining hash rate.

For this reason, the mining operations require a significant amount of electricity. What is more, the government doesn’t believe that mining operations significantly contribute to the local economy and job creation. For this reason, the government wants to prioritize electricity usage for other sectors of the economy.

In addition to its oil reserves in the North Sea, Norway benefits from significant hydropower capacity due to its geography. This renewable energy source does not burn fossil fuels, making it a more sustainable option from a carbon-neutral perspective.



Source link

June 20, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
FanDuel bans bettor for heckling Gabby Thomas at track event
Esports

FanDuel bans bettor for heckling Gabby Thomas at track event

by admin June 4, 2025


  • David PurdumJun 4, 2025, 10:26 AM ET

    Close

    • Joined ESPN in 2014
    • Journalist covering gambling industry since 2008

FanDuel said it has banned a bettor who posted a video of himself heckling Olympic gold medalist Gabby Thomas at a recent track event and claimed “it made my parlay win.”

Thomas posted on X that the unnamed man “followed me around the track as I took pictures and signed autographs for fans (mostly children) shouting personal insults” last weekend at a Grand Slam Track event in Philadelphia.

Grand Slam Track said in a statement that it is conducting a “full investigation into the reprehensible behavior captured on video.”

“We are working to identify the individual involved and will take appropriate action as necessary,” Grand Slam Track said. “We will implement additional safeguards to help prevent incidents like this in the future. Let us be clear, despicable behavior like this will not be tolerated.”

Editor’s Picks

The bettor, who goes by “mr100kaday” on social media and describes himself as “The Track and Field Bully,” posted a video of himself heckling Thomas ahead of the 100-meter race alongside a screenshot of a $1,000 parlay bet on FanDuel.

“I made Gabby lose by heckling her. And it made my parlay win,” the man wrote in a post on X.

FanDuel said that it informed the customer that he has been banned from its platform.

“FanDuel condemns in the strongest terms abusive behavior directed towards athletes,” a FanDuel spokesperson said in a statement to ESPN. “Threatening or harassing athletes is unacceptable and has no place in sports. This customer is no longer able to wager with FanDuel.”

Gabby Thomas said a man “followed me around the track” and insulted her at a recent event. The unidentified man has been banned from wagering at FanDuel after posting a video of himself heckling Thomas and claiming that “it made my parlay win.” Patrick Smith/Getty Images

Cases of online harassment of athletes rarely result in criminal charges and can be difficult to investigate due to the anonymity of social media.

It marks the latest incident involving athletes being targeted by bettors, a troubling trend that Major League Baseball players have said has increased in recent years with the expansion of legal sports betting in the United States.

Houston Astros pitcher Lance McCullers Jr. said he received threats on social media toward his family after a game in May. The Houston Police Department tracked the threats to an overseas bettor.

A study commissioned last year by the NCAA found that abuse by “angry sports bettors” is one of the most common types of harassment college athletes receive, making up at least 12% of publicly posted social media abuse.



Source link

June 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Singapore
GameFi Guides

Singapore Bans Crypto Service Exports Starting June 30

by admin June 4, 2025


Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Local crypto firms in Singapore must stop serving overseas clients with token services by June 30, 2025. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) made the move clear after listening to feedback on its new rules under the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2022.

Any company, individual or partnership registered in Singapore that offers token services abroad needs to pause or shut down those operations unless it grabs a license in time.

License Requirement For Crypto Services

According to MAS, firms that fall under Section 137 of the FSM Act are treated as operating from Singapore, even if most of their work happens overseas.

That means even if token services aren’t your main thing, you still need a license to keep going. No extra time is coming—MAS says they won’t offer any transition period. Acting after June 30, 2025 without proper approval could lead to serious trouble.

BTC is now trading at $106,629. Chart: TradingView

Hefty Penalties For Non-Compliance

Based on reports, local token service providers that ignore the rule could face fines up to SGD 250,000 or about USD 200,000. They could also see jail time reaching three years.

Only businesses that already have a spot under existing financial laws—like the Securities and Futures Act, the Financial Advisers Act or the Payment Services Act—can carry on without worrying about the new DTSP rules. That limits how many outfits can still serve overseas clients without significant changes.

A scenic view of Singapore. Image: Expedia.

Exec Says Licenses Will Be Rare

Hagen Rooke, a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, warned that MAS will hand out new DTSP licenses only in very rare cases. He said these kinds of services bring extra concerns around anti-money laundering and stopping terrorist financing.

That means most firms will find it hard to qualify. MAS will grant licenses under the new framework only in extremely limited circumstances, Rooke wrote on LinkedIn. He urged local outfits to look at ways to strip out their Singapore links or move parts of their operations elsewhere to avoid falling under these strict rules.

Industry Faces Restructuring Decisions

Small and mid-sized firms that built a global user base from Singapore now face a tough choice: scale back to serve local customers only, or shift their headquarters outside Singapore’s borders.

For many, it may come down to cost. The extra work needed to meet tighter checks could be more than what fledgling teams can handle. Some business owners worry this will push talent away, as engineers and compliance officers might follow jobs to friendlier crypto hubs.

Big players, including established banks or deep-pocketed startups already licensed under other Acts, are better placed to survive these changes.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.



Source link

June 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
xqc and asmongold with a twitch background
Esports

Twitch hit with class action lawsuit alleging TOS bans users for criticizing platform

by admin June 3, 2025



A class action lawsuit has been filed against Twitch, accusing the Amazon-owned platform of violating California law by prohibiting users from criticizing the site.

On June 1, a lawsuit was filed in California by a Twitch user by the name of Daniel Blitch, claiming the platform was violating the state’s Yelp Law.

The law prohibits businesses from including clauses in contracts that restrict individuals from making statements regarding the business, its staff and its services.

Article continues after ad

According to the lawsuit, through Twitch’s terms of service and terms of sale, the platform “unlawfully seeks to restrict users’ ability to freely share their experiences with Twitch’s platform and services, in violation of California Civil Code.”

Twitch accused of using TOS to silence criticism

Blitch, an individual from LA, has been subscribed to streamers since at least 2020, and claims that the platform prohibits or discourages users from making statements that could be harmful to its brand.

“Twitch’s Terms includes language to the effect that users may not post content Twitch deems harmful, disparaging, misleading, or offensive. Such provisions are enforced through moderation, account penalties, and removal of content,” the lawsuit alleges, further noting that the site can ban users for any reason,” the suit reads.

Article continues after ad

Article continues after ad

Twitch is involved in a class action lawsuit with a “Daniel Blitch” leading the charge

Basically, he and others allege Twitch’s TOS is so specific and unique that he argues the entire Twitch TOS is invalid

Document is 9 pages

(1-4) pic.twitter.com/5Z04dyeYN3

— yeet (@Awk20000) June 2, 2025

As an example, the lawsuit referenced how at one point, there were discussions about Twitch not paying streamers well enough, leading Blitch and other users to be careful about how they approached the topic, even using words like “onionized” instead “unionized.”

“Twitch’s enforcement of its Terms deters users from expressing their genuine views, thereby chilling consumer speech,” the suit added.

Additionally, Blitch claimed that in at least one instance, a Twitch user was reprimanded for their criticisms of the platform.

Article continues after ad

Because this is a class action lawsuit, other Twitch users in California who purchased subscriptions or goods may be eligible to join. Under the Yelp Law, civil penalties start at $2,500 per violation, but can increase to $10,000 for willful or reckless violations.

At the time of writing, Twitch hasn’t publicly responded to the lawsuit, but this isn’t the first time the site has found itself in legal trouble.

Article continues after ad

Earlier in 2025, an exclusive Dexerto report revealed the platform had continued to bill some users for subscriptions to streamers who had been permanently banned on the site. Users were subsequently refunded after an attorney had planned a class action lawsuit on behalf of those affected.

Article continues after ad





Source link

June 3, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Overwatch 2’s hero bans mean changes for Sombra, Zarya, and more
Game Updates

Overwatch 2’s hero bans mean changes for Sombra, Zarya, and more

by admin May 24, 2025


Blizzard Entertainment rolled out its hero ban feature for Overwatch 2 in April, and if you’ve been playing any competitive games during season 16, you’ve probably noticed that certain heroes (e.g., Sombra, Zarya, Symmetra, Ana, Mercy) are among the most consistently banned characters. Newly published data from Blizzard shows that to be the case, with some qualifications, and it seems the frequency of banning those heroes will ultimately have some consequences. Some heroes may get rebalanced or more substantially changed, the developer says, partly as a result of their consistent bans.

“Sombra leads the PC pack with an impressive 85% ban rate, followed by Zarya at 59% and Doomfist at 43%,” Blizzard said in a blog post. “On consoles, Sombra is banned even more, with a 93% rate. She’s followed by Zarya at 57% and Symmetra at 23%.”

Gavin Winter, a senior systems designer at Blizzard, says that the past month’s worth of hero ban data will be used “to help inform balance changes” in Overwatch 2. “Heroes that are more niche or map specific may need to become more generalized if they’re always banned where they perform well,” Winter said. “Heroes that are very unpopular might see more adjustments regardless of performance. Ultimately though, there aren’t any specific changes in the works based on this data yet, and Hero Ban data alone would never dictate how Heroes are balanced.”

Exactly what that means for characters like Zarya and Symmetra is obviously unclear, but if a character like Sombra is unavailable to play in 85% of competitive games of Overwatch 2 because players hate facing her, that’s a big problem. What’s the point of investing in a character if you can only play them competitively so rarely?

That said, minus some tie-breaking decision-making quirks in the hero ban system, Blizzard is “happy with how it works overall.” Winter said, “We believe the system is meeting most of its goals, and we’re excited to see how Hero Bans evolve over time, especially once we start releasing more data about our Hero win rates and pick rates in the future!”

Blizzard will give players more control over how matches play in season 17, due in late June, when it rolls out a new map-voting feature.



Source link

May 24, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (994)
  • Esports (748)
  • Game Reviews (692)
  • Game Updates (874)
  • GameFi Guides (985)
  • Gaming Gear (939)
  • NFT Gaming (967)
  • Product Reviews (930)
  • Uncategorized (1)

Recent Posts

  • Silksong excitement has seen Hollow Knight’s concurrent Steam peak record smashed over and over again
  • The Framework Desktop and Linux have shown me the path to PC gaming in the living room
  • Bitcoin (BTC) Price Prediction for August 24
  • Trump-Backed World Liberty Gets Coinbase Approval With USD1 Stablecoin Listing
  • One of the best detective games of the decade is free to keep on Epic this week

Recent Posts

  • Silksong excitement has seen Hollow Knight’s concurrent Steam peak record smashed over and over again

    August 24, 2025
  • The Framework Desktop and Linux have shown me the path to PC gaming in the living room

    August 24, 2025
  • Bitcoin (BTC) Price Prediction for August 24

    August 24, 2025
  • Trump-Backed World Liberty Gets Coinbase Approval With USD1 Stablecoin Listing

    August 24, 2025
  • One of the best detective games of the decade is free to keep on Epic this week

    August 24, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • Silksong excitement has seen Hollow Knight’s concurrent Steam peak record smashed over and over again

    August 24, 2025
  • The Framework Desktop and Linux have shown me the path to PC gaming in the living room

    August 24, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close