Tag:

amount

Vs Youtube Callofdutyblackops7worldpremieretrailergamescomopeningnightlive2025 2’27”
Game Reviews

Call Of Duty Still Has A ‘Shocking’ Amount Of Last Gen Players

by admin


Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 is set to launch this November. And, surprisingly, a decade after the PS4 and Xbox One’s launch, BLOPS 7 is still arriving day one on the aging machines. According to the devs making the next entry in Activision’s blockbuster franchise, the old consoles don’t force them to hold anything back, and Call of Duty is still played by a “shocking” amount of people on those platforms.

In a new interview with Dexerto, Treyarch’s senior director of production Yale Miller and associate design director Lawrence Metten addressed fan concerns that developing Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 for the now 13-year-old PS4 and Xbox One was holding the game back and limiting what the studio could do on PC and current-gen hardware. According to them, that’s not the case at all.

“The way we’ve talked about it always is, you should never be thinking about old-gen for the features that you’re designing,”  Miller told the outlet.

Instead, the team builds the game for PS5, Xbox Series X/S, and PC, and then makes it work on the older machines. This sometimes leads to features not making it onto PS4 and Xbox One, a disappointing decision for last-gen players, but one that the studio is willing to make.

“[Theater mode in Black Ops 6 was] something that we knew we wanted to do,” said Metten. “We can’t support it on old-gen. That’s not a reason not to do the feature. We’re gonna bite the bullet and disable it on old-gen.”

Why Call of Duty is still launching on PS4 in 2025

As to why Activision is still developing Call of Duty games for the decade-old machines, the answer is obvious but still surprising: In 2025, there are still a lot of people playing these games on older consoles. Miller didn’t share specific numbers, but told Dexerto there is a “shocking number of people” playing new Call of Duty games on PS4 and Xbox One, and this apparently helps with matchmaking, giving them more players to work with.

“It made sense for us to [bring Black Ops 7 to last gen], and we could,” said Miler. “There are straight-up, like, graphical features and things that you just won’t see, but we feel like that doesn’t necessarily break the experience. And, obviously, there’s performance and other things that are not gonna be as good, but that’s it. It’s just players.”

While that makes sense, I can’t help but feel like it might be time to move on, especially as EA’s upcoming Battlefield 6 is doing that and cutting PS4 and Xbox One loose. However, while both are military shooters, they offer very different experiences and demand different things from the platforms they are available on.

Still, if CoD is so scalable and flexible, I do wonder why the team isn’t, as far as we know, working on a Switch 2 port of Black Ops 7. Perhaps they also struggled to get dev kits ahead of Nintendo’s console launch earlier this year? Or maybe somewhere deep inside the massive entity that is Activision-owned studios, someone is tinkering with Black Ops 7 on Switch 2 right now. I wouldn’t bet on it, but maybe you like to gamble?



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Palworld will emerge from early access in 2026, with a "truly massive" amount of stuff planned for 1.0 update
Game Updates

Palworld will emerge from early access in 2026, with a “truly massive” amount of stuff planned for 1.0 update

by admin


Palworld is set to finally emerge from early access in 2026, developers Pocketpair have announced. There’s a lot of work the game about not-Pokémon, guns, and maunfacturing will need prior to that point, say the studio who’ve been busy staring down Lionel Hutzes who probably know the DK rap off by heart. They’ve also teased that a bunch of new additions are in the works for the 1.0 update.

Watch on YouTube

“While we have a lot of ideas for where we want to take Palworld, we also need to start thinking about Palworld 1.0,” Pocketpair communications director and publishing manager John ‘Bucky’ Buckley said in the above video announcement. “Beyond just adding new content there’s a lot of cleanup that needs to be done before Palworld can exit early access.

“It’s no secret that Palworld has a lot of quirks and jank, and we want to take the time to properly address those before releasing the game. With that in mind, we plan to start that cleanup this year. Our goal is to ultimately release Palworld next year, in 2026, and we think taking the time now to fix those problems will ultimately lead to a better game.”

As a result, the studio plans to be “a little quiet” for the rest of 2025, with the survival game’s winter update not set to be as chunky as the Feybreak or v0.4 update it got last December. That said, Buckley did still indicate “a few surprises” are planned for that winter update.

The big tease-a-thon continued, with the community manager declaring that a “truly massive amount of content” is in the works for the 1.0 update that’ll bring Palworld out of the early access cocoon it’s occupied since January last year. “We plan to share some sneak peeks about Palworld 1.0 in the very near future,” he concluded.

Amid releasing updates including the likes of crossplay and a Terarria collab so far this year, Pocketpair have been getting a publishing arm up and running. Horror game Dead Take from Tales Of Kenzera: ZAU devs Surgent Studios and retro-handheld-inspired angler Normal Fishing are among the titles the studio have helped release or signed up so far. All while Mario gives them the evils from a window across the road. Make sure to give our Katherine’s review of early access Palworld a read if you’re keen to be reminded what it’s all about.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Holding this amount puts you in that category
GameFi Guides

Holding this amount puts you in that category

by admin



Scott Melker, host of “The Wolf of All Streets” podcast, revived his “Bitcoin rich list” in his Aug. 29 newsletter—a table showing how BTC is spread across wallets of different sizes.

Melker said he last compiled the list in 2023, and his latest version offers a snapshot of how Bitcoin ownership has changed over the past two years.

Summary

  • Addresses holding at least 1 BTC account for the top 98% of holders, Melker says.
  • The most significant two-year change is that the number of addresses holding up to 0.0001 BTC has doubled.
  • The price of becoming a wholecoiner is growing year after year; hardcore bitcoiners say it’s never too late to invest in BTC.

You don’t have to be a ‘wholecoiner’

Melker claims that owning 0.1 BTC makes a person one of the top 8% holders.

Also, you don’t have to be a “wholecoiner” — a person holding at least 1 BTC — to become a top-tier Bitcoin owner. Why? When BTC is traded at around $110,000 (its current price is $108,500) even owning 0.1 BTC makes you richer in Bitcoin than 92% of all other Bitcoin holders.

And holding one Bitcoin or more puts you above 98% of all holders. 

This data doesn’t exclude holdings stored on the wallets of the crypto exchanges. Of 20 addresses holding the largest amounts of BTC (between 36,000 and nearly 250,000 bitcoins), only eight belong to unidentified entities.

Generally, the data shift between 2023 and 2025 is not drastic. Melker notes that in two years, the overall number of Bitcoin addresses grew by 10 million, reaching over 56 million.

The most notable change is an inflow of addresses holding between 0.00001 and 0.0001 BTC. It grew from 3.5 million to 6.9 million. “That makes sense, as more people start small,” Melker says, adding:

“That stability is actually healthy. It shows Bitcoin ownership distribution is maturing.”

From the additional data attached to Melker’s write-up, we can learn that the amount of Bitcoin dust reached an all-time high in 2025 at 1.58 thousand BTC. Bitcoin dust refers to leftovers, too small to be sent due to an insufficient amount to pay transaction fees. 

Meanwhile, the dormant wallet chart indicates:

  • 12.5 million of Bitcoin (over half of the total supply) are still for a year.
  • Over 10 million bitcoins have remained inactive for more than two years.
  • Almost 8 million bitcoins have not moved in three years.

The curve showing the amount of BTC on dormant addresses got sharper following the 2024 presidential election after President Donald Trump vowed that America will never sell its bitcoins.

Becoming a wholecoiner in 2025

If holding 0.1 BTC makes someone “Bitcoin rich,” then owning a full bitcoin—the coveted “wholecoiner” status—certainly does too. But the price of becoming a wholecoiner has risen dramatically over time. Buying 1 BTC in 2013 was a very different proposition than buying it in 2025.

At nearly every stage in Bitcoin’s history, skeptics have insisted it was “too late” to buy, arguing that the price had already climbed too high to rise further. Countless stories online reflect this doubt, with many early adopters regretting that they sold too soon. Even back when Bitcoin traded under $100, people hesitated to buy back in because it already felt “expensive.”

One of the most famous examples comes from early adopter Greg Schoen. In 2011, he tweeted that he had bought 1,700 BTC at $0.06 each, only to sell at $0.30. He lamented missing the chance to sell at $8, which would have netted him $13,600 instead of just $510. That tweet became so iconic that Schoen auctioned it as an NFT in 2022. What he couldn’t have known is that by 2025, his 1,700 BTC would be worth more than $180 million.

Today, only a little over 2,000 Bitcoin addresses hold more than 1,000 BTC. Whether Schoen is still among them remains unclear, but his story illustrates a timeless theme in Bitcoin: almost every era feels like it’s “too late”—until the next one arrives.

I wish I had kept my 1,700 BTC @ $0.06 instead of selling them at $0.30, now that they’re $8.00! #bitcoin

— gregschoen.eth (@GregSchoen) May 16, 2011

Top-tier Bitcoin bar

The number of addresses that hold above one Bitcoin (less than 2%) is slightly below one million. According to the UBS Global Wealth Report, 18.1% of adults worldwide hold assets exceeding $100,000.

It signifies that a Bitcoin-rich person is far from being the biggest fiat-rich person. The top-tier bar for bitcoiners is set lower than for the fiat money holders. It reflects how early it is to view Bitcoin as a widely adopted asset used to hold vast fortunes.

Despite all the hype, government adoption, and inflows of institutional money, Bitcoin remains a special interest of a growing, but not yet ubiquitous, group of people.





Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Sam Altman testifying on capital hill.
Gaming Gear

‘Someone is going to lose a phenomenal amount of money’ says OpenAI CEO Sam Altman about unwise AI investment. ‘When bubbles happen, smart people get overexcited about a kernel of truth’

by admin



OpenAI CEO Sam Altman spoke to assembled reporters at a dinner in San Francisco late last week on the topic of, you guessed it, AI, the applications of AI, and the vast sums of money moving behind the scenes to fund it. Despite being one of the most vocal advocates of the tech, Altman had some words of caution for investors jumping on the artificial intelligence train.

According to The Verge, Altman said it was “insane” that AI startups consisting of “three people and an idea” are receiving huge amounts of funding off the back of incredibly high company valuations, describing it as “not rational behaviour.”

“Someone is going to lose a phenomenal amount of money. We don’t know who, and a lot of people are going to make a phenomenal amount of money,” said Altman.


Related articles

“When bubbles happen, smart people get overexcited about a kernel of truth. If you look at most of the bubbles in history, like the tech bubble, there was a real thing.” said Altman, referencing the infamous dot-com bubble of the late 1990s. “Tech was really important. The internet was a really big deal. People got overexcited.”

That being said, Altman stopped short of calling investment in AI overall a bad idea for the economy in general: “My personal belief, although I may turn out to be wrong, is that, on the whole, this would be a huge net win.”

At the same dinner, Altman confirmed that OpenAI would still be spending vast amounts of money (partially provided, presumably, by the likes of Softbank and the Dragoneer Investment Group in OpenAI’s latest $8.3 billion funding round) to keep the company at the top of the AI financial leaderbooks.

“You should expect OpenAI to spend trillions of dollars on data center construction in the not very distant future,” Altman said. “You should expect a bunch of economists to wring their hands.”

Well, it certainly appears to cost a whole lot of moolah just to keep the good ship OpenAI afloat. The company has raised staggering sums of cash over the past decade to develop and run its various AI implementations, the most famous of which being ChatGPT. Reports last year indicated that OpenAI had spent $8.5 billion on LLM training and staffing for its generative AI efforts, while other analysts have predicted it costs $700,000 a day to run ChatGPT alone.

The Information recently projected that OpenAI would be burning through $20 billion in cash flow by 2027, with the company said to be hopeful that investors like Softbank would stump up another $30 to $40 billion to continue funding its operations.

A CG render of Meta’s planned Hyperion data center, superimposed over Manhattan. (Image credit: Meta)

Still, those spending figures don’t appear to be in the trillions yet, although that estimated sum is perhaps of little surprise to those of us that keep an eye on AI data center expansion.

Given that Altman’s rival, Elon Musk, has been booting up and expanding xAI’s Colossus supercomputer with incredible speed, and with the news that Meta is expanding its data center operations at such a rate it’s currently having to house a significant portion of its racks in nearby tents, OpenAI will feel the need to keep up—and to do that it needs to spend (and raise) huge amounts of cash over the next few years.

One would assume that Altman is confident enough in his company’s efforts to place its investors on the “going to make phenomenal sums of money” side of things, but his comments should perhaps serve as a warning to those looking to jump in with both feet without correctly judging the landing. Someone has to lose in the great AI race, I suppose. And as to which companies survive, and which come to a sticky end? That remains very much an open question for now.

Best graphics card 2025

All our current recommendations



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Close