Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Category:

Gaming Gear

Promotional images of Lego Voyagers.
Gaming Gear

I could look at Lego Voyagers for hours, but that’s not the only reason why this co-op adventure might be the next Split Fiction

by admin September 1, 2025



A spiritual successor to the excellent Lego Builder’s Journey, Lego Voyagers takes the serene puzzle action of its predecessor to new heights with a focus on two player co-op play. A celebration of friendship and creativity, I went hands-on with roughly half an hour of the game as part of an early preview session ahead of Gamescom 2025 and enjoyed every second.

For starters, it’s easily one of the best-looking Lego games ever made – capturing the look and feel of the popular building toy perfectly. Its world is crafted entirely from real-life Lego pieces, rendered with loving attention to detail. The way that tiles fit together with a tiny visible gap or at slightly uneven angles is not only impressively realistic, but lends the world a pleasantly tactile appearance.

It’s life-like, but beautiful too. Everything is bathed in soft atmospheric lighting that bounces off the plastic surface to give it an almost dream-like glow that’s incredibly warm and cozy. Even those with no affinity for Lego will be able to appreciate that Voyagers is one stunning game.


You may like

1×2

(Image credit: Annapurna Interactive)

You and your companion play as tiny little bricks (part 3005 for all the real Lego pros out there), complete with a cute animated eye. These unassuming protagonists are simply adorable, cutely rolling around the screen like characters from a stop-motion animation.

Rather than speaking, your character sings, triggered by the press of a button, adding to the gentle and melodic background music and occasionally helping you solve the many puzzles.

Like Builder’s Journey, this is ultimately a game about the joy of getting from A to B, so your objective is simply figuring out how to progress. You can attach yourself to almost any visible stud (that’s the round bit on the top of a Lego brick) in the game with a satisfying click, so it’s sometimes as easy as jumping between a few exposed points up the side of your obstacle.

There are more complex encounters, too, that require attaching yourself to loose bricks. Once stuck, you can roll around with them for easy transport, then hold a key to place them in order to construct bridges or towers.

Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.

As this is a co-op-only experience, you can expect lots of moments where teamwork is a necessity. One puzzle, for example, had my co-op partner triggering catapults to send valuable bricks my way, while another had them activating switches to keep vital platforms accessible.

If you’ve tried the likes of Split Fiction or It Takes Two, then you know roughly the kind of design to expect here, and I certainly felt that it scratched my itch for a new co-op adventure. As with those games, Lego Voyagers will feature a Friend’s Pass system in addition to full local co-op that lets a buddy join your game at any time for free.

(Image credit: Annapurna Interactive)

There are plenty of diversions along the way, too, clearly intended to evoke feelings of companionship. I never thought I would get emotional over two plastic bricks sitting on a swing staring into the sunset, but the excellent presentation means that it’s surprisingly poignant and effective.

This is on top of a host of amusing and creative ways to interact with the world, such as bizarre-looking flowers that shoot up into the air like a firework as you brush past, the little bucket piece you can wear as a hat, or being able to stick yourself to the scuttling crabs represented by red horizontal clip tiles – look up Lego piece 60470 and you’ll see the vision!

Although I ultimately didn’t get to see much of the world in my brief preview session, there’s something surprisingly somber about it. The areas you explore are full of industrial debris, abandoned train tracks, and hints of something much larger than you.

It’s all very mysterious, and I’m eager to see whatever Lego Voyagers has in store for me and a friend when it launches for PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo Switch, and PC on September 15.

You might also like…



Source link

September 1, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive CS:GO Valve
Gaming Gear

AntGamer is releasing a 1,000 Hz gaming monitor next year, with a helping hand from AMD, though the chances are you really don’t need it

by admin September 1, 2025



The first widely available 1,000 Hz gaming monitor will launch in 2026, but unless you are at the top of the top in a select few games, you likely won’t be able to tell the difference between this and a monitor with a fifth of the refresh rate.

As reported by ITHome, Chinese manufacturer AntGamer recently announced its new 1,000 Hz panel will arrive in 2026, and players are encouraged to test it out with Counter-Strike 2 and PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds. As you might be able to guess from those choices, this is firmly a competitive monitor.

AntGamer reportedly published a white paper alongside AMD demonstrating the specs needed for 1,000 fps play in these games, but we don’t yet know how broad the full recommended games list is. This report was cited in a presentation by the company.


Related articles

The new 1,000 Hz screen is a TN panel, rather than an IPS or the rather fast OLED. Where IPS panels offer a large viewing angle and great colours at a more expensive price, and OLEDs offer great contrast and true blacks, TN panels are often picked in the competitive scene due to fast response times. They also tend to be cheaper, but offer a much worse picture quality than other panel types.

With IPS, TN, and OLED being ‘Sample and Hold’ displays, they are subject to motion blur. Effectively, these three all project an image, then hold that image until the next one is ready. CRT TVs create, then continuously recreate the same image, which is why they are known for having less motion blur. As noted by Blurbusters, 60 fps on a 60 Hz display runs into 16.7 ms of blur persistence, where 1,000 fps on a 1,000 Hz display runs into just 1 ms.

Higher frame rates are definitely better for visual quality. They also are power hungry, so it will take a while to solve that for standalone HMDs. I think 240 Hz/eye is a good short term target and agree with 1kHz+ for the long run.December 2, 2017

This monitor employs BFI (black frame insertion), which pops a black frame in between every displayed frame in order to help with motion blur. You get fewer pixels of motion blur at higher refresh rates, but even running a game at 1,000 fps won’t remove it entirely. Asus’ third generation of OLED monitors, like the ROG Swift PG34WCDM, support the same tech.

This isn’t our first time seeing a 1,000 Hz monitor (there was a TCL with it last year), but it is the first that is confirmed to be coming to the market. Unfortunately, much is still missing from AntGamer’s model right now. We don’t have the price point or confirmation of which ports the monitor will employ, either.

Keep up to date with the most important stories and the best deals, as picked by the PC Gamer team.

You may be wondering how much is too much when it comes to refresh rate, and that’s a valid concern given the average gamer likely won’t be able to tell a difference between mid-300s and 1,000 Hz. The refresh rate of a monitor caps the fps you will see, even if your GPU is providing them much quicker.

1,000+ fps is pretty rare, with you needing a newer, powerful graphics card playing an older/less intensive game, and with an uncapped rate. Though it may strike some as premature, Morgan McGuire, an ex-Nvidia scientist, did once say, “I think 240 Hz/eye is a good short term target and agree with 1 kHz+ for the long run.”

Ultimately, right now, monitors this snappy are intended for players performing at the very top, and they often have the additional gear to match it. In fact, when your fps is significantly lower than refresh, it can introduce notable tearing, so this panel will likely only be used for very specific purposes. Most importantly, it won’t make you any better at Elden Ring.

Best gaming monitors 2025

All our current recommendations




Source link

September 1, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Prusa Tool Changer
Gaming Gear

3D printing’s tool changer wars heat up as Prusa re-enters the ring

by admin September 1, 2025



This month, the 3D printing community has seen the announcement of four different tool-changing FDM printers. First was Snapmaker’s U1, a machine we received for review while still in beta testing. Then slipping under the radar was newcomer AtomForm with a 12-nozzle system and a desire to keep things low-key while it tested the waters. This week, Bambu Lab and Prusa Research made surprise announcements of their own.

Prusa Research didn’t invent the tool changer, but it certainly ignited a desire in the 3D printing community for a more efficient solution to color FDM printing. Announced in 2021, the Prusa XL is a beast of a machine that costs over $4,500 when fully loaded with all five tool heads and an enclosure. That’s quite a stretch for the hobby market, so the XL remained an elite machine for a more professional crowd.

It took several years, but Snapmaker countered Prusa with an “affordable” tool changer, priced as low as priced as $649 for eager early birds armed with a special rebate. Launched last week, the U1 took Kickstarter by storm, with over 14,000 people backing the Kickstarter to date, pledging over $13 million for a desktop-sized tool changer.


You may like

Bambu Lab, either emboldened by Snapmaker’s success or bothered by possible competition from newcomer Atomform, rushed an announcement of its own tool changer-like machine, the H2C. The announcement was oddly timed, just one hour after the launch of the Bambu Lab H2S, the company’s largest Core XY machine with a single nozzle.

The H2C is perhaps “tool changer adjacent” as it only swaps out the nozzle, and will still need to use an AMS system to feed filament. This method is also being used by AtomForm, a Chinese company backed by MOVA Tech, a manufacturer of LiDAR-guided robotic lawn mowers. The Palette 300, a 300 x 300 x 300 mm 12-color-nozzle swapper, will launch on Kickstarter soon. Pricing for that machine will start at $1,499, though no one has yet seen a live demonstration. We’re seeking an interview with AtomForm and will have details on this new machine as soon as they are available.

Bringing the tool changer story full circle is Josef Prusa, with a simple post on X of a popcorn emoji and a close-up photo of a CORE One with six tool heads. The post has garnered over 179,000 views, along with hundreds of likes, comments, and reposts.

Bondtech followed up the post with a tease of its own, confirming a collaboration between the companies. Bondtech’s latest project is the INDX, a DIY tool changer kit that we’ve been seeing this year at 3D printing shows, usually attached to a Voron. Bondtech was scheduled to release the INDX in November.

Get Tom’s Hardware’s best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

(Image credit: Prusa, Bambu Lab)

The INDX uses a wireless system and induction-based heating. The tools are promised to be simple and light. A CORE One with this high-tech tool changer system could put Prusa Research back on top of the consumer 3D Printer wish list.

Currently, the CORE One can be adapted to color printing with the addition of an MMU3, a complex and unwieldy five-color system. We’ve used the MMU3 on a Prusa MK4 and found that once set up, it works beautifully and with very little wasted filament. Since the MMU3 does not have a cutter, it yanks back as much filament from the hotend as it can, then pushes the rest into a purge tower, leaving no printer poop. We are currently setting up a CORE One with MMU3 for review, but the build will take some time.

Building an MMU3 is not for the faint of heart. (Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Follow Tom’s Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!



Source link

September 1, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Today, College Kids Get Ridiculously Drunk. In Medieval England, They Got Ridiculously Murderous
Gaming Gear

Today, College Kids Get Ridiculously Drunk. In Medieval England, They Got Ridiculously Murderous

by admin September 1, 2025


What words come to mind when you think of the Middle Ages, also known as the medieval period? If you’re thinking “violence,” you’re not wrong (though I would have added “smelly”).

To investigate the spread of medieval violence, researchers in the U.S. and U.K. developed medieval “murder maps” of London, Oxford, and York by mapping out 355 murders between 1296 and 1398. They studied historic jury investigations into strange deaths, which describe when the attack took place, the location of the body, the murder weapon, and occasionally the reason behind it.

This approach revealed insightful patterns of 600- to 700-year-old urban violence—including the fact that university students were even more ridiculously troublesome than college kids today.

Armed, murderous students

“Homicides were highly concentrated in key nodes of urban life such as markets, squares, and thoroughfares,” in addition to such hotspots as waterfronts and ceremonial spaces, the researchers explained in a study published earlier this summer in the journal Criminal Law Forum. In terms of timing, Sundays were the most murderous days, especially around curfew. Church in the morning was frequently followed by drinking, sports, and fights later in the day.

Each of the three cities had very different local patterns of violence, however. Oxford, for example, had a homicide rate three to four times higher than London or York. While this might seem to be at odds with the posh university city you’re probably imagining, the posh university is actually the exact reason behind those surprising rates.

“The medieval university attracted young men aged between 14 and 21, many living far from home, armed and steeped in a culture of honour and group loyalty,” University of Hull’s Stephanie Brown and University of Cambridge’s Manuel Eisner, two criminologists and co-authors of the study, wrote for The Conversation. “Students organised themselves into ‘nations’ based on their regional origins and quarrels between northerners and southerners regularly erupted into street battles.”

To make matters worse, students were often considered above the common law, so their violence could go unpunished. In fact, Oxford’s homicides were concentrated in or near the university quarter, also as a result of conflicts between students and townspeople.

The more public, the better

In London, the medieval homicidal hotspots included Westcheap, the “commercial and ceremonial heart of the city,” according to Brown and Eisner, as well as the Thames Street waterfront. The former was the site of murders associated with guild rivalries, professional feuds, and public revenge attacks, while the latter saw violence among sailors and tradespeople.

York saw significant levels of homicide in one of its main town entrances, an area that hosted significant commercial, civic, and social life as well. The concentration of travellers, locals, and merchants would have naturally caused some conflict. Stonegate, an esteemed street in York that made up part of a ceremonial route, also experienced much violence. Perhaps unexpectedly, such wealthy areas provided opportunities for competition, vengeance, and public displays of honor.

In fact, “in all three cities, some homicides were committed in spaces of high visibility and symbolic significance,” the team wrote in the study. Such public spectacles could have solidified an individual’s reputation and/or made a gruesomely compelling point. Interestingly, there were fewer murder inquests in medieval England’s poorer, marginal neighborhoods—though it’s worth considering the possibility that there wasn’t much pressure to investigate unusual deaths in less privileged communities in the first place.

Nevertheless, “the study also raises broader questions about the long-term decline of homicide,” the researchers concluded in the study, “suggesting that changes in urban governance and spatial organization may have played a crucial role in reducing lethal violence.”



Source link

September 1, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Magnesium Supplements Crash Course: Benefits and Side Effects
Gaming Gear

Magnesium Supplements Crash Course: Benefits and Side Effects

by admin September 1, 2025


Suddenly, everyone is obsessed with magnesium supplements. It’s the key ingredient in #sleepygirlmocktails, powders stirred into tart cherry juice and prebiotic soda, a wellness cocktail for anxious millennials. Your coworkers are popping magnesium glycinate before bed instead of melatonin, because it allegedly cures insomnia, constipation, and existential dread. Folks seem especially concerned with optimizing their poop and pillow time. In the past year, Google searches for “which magnesium is best for sleep” and “which magnesium makes you poop” have more than doubled.

Magnesium is essential for maintaining a healthy cardiovascular system. It’s also one of the most abundant minerals in the human body, running more than 300 biochemical reactions, from protein synthesis to nerve function and blood sugar regulation. It supports bone structure and helps shuttle calcium and potassium across cell membranes, a process that allows for muscle contractions and normal heart rhythms.

You can get it from foods like legumes, leafy vegetables, and whole grains, or from fortified foods and dietary supplements. The question is: Do you need to supplement?

TikTok content

This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from.

Symptoms of Magnesium Deficiency

While an essential mineral for overall health, many people don’t get enough magnesium. This is partly because magnesium is predominantly found in high-fiber foods, and a significant portion of Americans do not consume sufficient fiber, according to registered dietitian Sue-Ellen Anderson-Haynes. Research confirms this: More than 90 percent of women and 97 percent of men fail to meet the recommended daily intake for dietary fiber.

Older adults are particularly at risk, as the body’s ability to absorb magnesium decreases with age. Health conditions like Crohn’s disease or kidney disease, alcohol use disorder, and the use of diuretics can all lead to magnesium depletion.

Anderson-Haynes notes that a magnesium deficiency (also known as hypomagnesemia) can result in a range of symptoms, such as headaches, nausea, constipation, tremors, heart palpitations, and muscle soreness. Chronic magnesium deficiency can increase the risk of developing high blood pressure, osteoporosis, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes.

Benefits of Magnesium Supplements

There are several forms of magnesium supplements, including:

  • Magnesium citrate: Often taken as a remedy for occasional constipation.
  • Magnesium glycinate: Often taken for better sleep and reduced anxiety.
  • Magnesium oxide: Often taken for constipation or indigestion.
  • Magnesium l-threonate: Often taken for better sleep, cognitive function, and reduced stress.
  • Magnesium chloride: Often taken as an electrolyte replenisher and for its laxative effect.

Supplements are most useful for people with a confirmed deficiency, but early research suggests possible benefits for specific conditions, including migraines, insomnia, and cardiovascular disease.

“It’s really overlooked that magnesium can help with menstrual cycle irregularity in terms of making sure that you’re not having severe cramping,” says Anderson-Haynes, who adds it may also benefit women in perimenopause and menopause. Clinically, it may be part of the treatment for pregnancy complications like preeclampsia and eclampsia.

Can You Take Too Much?

The recommended dietary allowance is 320 milligrams per day for women and 420 milligrams per day for men. These are amounts most people can reach with a balanced diet; healthy kidneys regulate magnesium levels, excreting excess when magnesium intake is high and conserving it when it’s low.

Daily supplements under 350 milligrams are generally considered safe for healthy adults. “If you take too much magnesium, you’ll probably get diarrhea, because it loosens the bowels,” Anderson-Haynes says. Other side effects include nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, and, at very high levels of magnesium (usually from overusing laxatives or antacids), low blood pressure, muscle cramps, breathing problems, and, in rare cases, cardiac arrest. People with kidney disease are at the highest risk of toxicity.

Should You Supplement?

For most healthy adults, magnesium supplements aren’t essential. If you struggle with migraines, insomnia, or other conditions where research suggests health benefits, they may be worth trying—but first talk to a health care professional.

Otherwise, focus on magnesium-rich foods. These include but are not limited to: legumes (beans, lentils, chickpeas), leafy greens (artichokes, kale, spinach), whole grains (oats, barley, quinoa), nuts (almonds, cashews, peanuts), fruit (bananas, avocado, dried apricots), and soy products (tofu, soy milk, edamame).

If you do decide to take any dietary supplements, “look for a seal or certification that says GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices) or NSF,” says Anderson-Haynes, stressing the importance of third-party tests and verifications, considering the FDA doesn’t regulate dietary supplements in the US.

Thorne

Magnesium Bisglycinate

Pure Encapsulations

Magnesium Glycinate

Meet the Experts

  • Sue-Ellen Anderson-Haynes, MS, RDN, CDCES, is a spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and founder of 360Girls&Women.

Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.





Source link

September 1, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
DAAPrivacyRightIcon
Gaming Gear

Save up to 25 percent on headphones, speakers and other gear

by admin September 1, 2025


The Labor Day and back-to-school season isn’t only a good time to save on things like a new laptop. Case in point: Sonos’ latest sale. Whether you want to upgrade the sound in your dorm room or home office, you can save up to 25 percent on Sonos speakers and other gear right now. Included in the sale is the Era 100, which has a 10-percent discount at the moment.

Our choice for midrange smart speaker is down to $179 from $199 as part of a larger Labor Day sale on the Sonos website. The same price is available on Amazon, as are some more deals on Sonos products.

Nathan Ingraham for Engadget

Sonos Era 100

$179$199Save $20

Get it now for 10 percent off. 

$179 at Sonos

Sonos debuted the Era 100 speaker in 2023 as a replacement for the Sonos One. It offers great sound quality and has built-in mics for Trueplay tuning and voice control. It’s worth mentioning that the Sonos Ace headphones are also on sale for $299, down from $399 — a 25 percent discount. The headphones have come a long way since they first launched, including the introduction of TrueCinema, which works with a Sonos soundbar to create the best spatial audio experience.

Follow @EngadgetDeals on X for the latest tech deals and buying advice.





Source link

September 1, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AI agents are science fiction not yet ready for primetime
Gaming Gear

AI agents are science fiction not yet ready for primetime

by admin September 1, 2025


This is The Stepback, a weekly newsletter breaking down one essential story from the tech world. For more on all things AI, follow Hayden Field. The Stepback arrives in our subscribers’ inboxes at 8AM ET. Opt in for The Stepback here.

It all started with J.A.R.V.I.S. Yes, that J.A.R.V.I.S. The one from the Marvel movies.

Well, maybe it didn’t start with Iron Man’s AI assistant, but the fictional system definitely helped the concept of an AI agent along. Whenever I’ve interviewed AI industry folks about agentic AI, they often point to J.A.R.V.I.S. as an example of the ideal AI tool in many ways — one that knows what you need done before you even ask, can analyze and find insights in large swaths of data, and can offer strategic advice or run point on certain aspects of your business. People sometimes disagree on the exact definition of an AI agent, but at its core, it’s a step beyond chatbots in that it’s a system that can perform multistep, complex tasks on your behalf without constantly needing back-and-forth communication with you. It essentially makes its own to-do list of subtasks it needs to complete in order to get to your preferred end goal. That fantasy is closer to being a reality in many ways, but when it comes to actual usefulness for the everyday user, there are a lot of things that don’t work — and maybe will never work.

The term “AI agent” has been around for a long time, but it especially started trending in the tech industry in 2023. That was the year of the concept of AI agents; the term was on everyone’s lips as people tried to suss out the idea and how to make it a reality, but you didn’t see many successful use cases. The next year, 2024, was the year of deployment — people were really putting the code out into the field and seeing what it could do. (The answer, at the time, was… not much. And filled with a bunch of error messages.)

I can pinpoint the hype around AI agents becoming widespread to one specific announcement: In February 2024, Klarna, a fintech company, said that after one month, its AI assistant (powered by OpenAI’s tech) had successfully done the work of 700 full-time customer service agents and automated two-thirds of the company’s customer service chats. For months, those statistics came up in almost every AI industry conversation I had.

The hype never died down, and in the following months, every Big Tech CEO seemed to harp on the term in every earnings call. Executives at Amazon, Meta, Google, Microsoft, and a whole host of other companies began to talk about their commitment to building useful and successful AI agents — and tried to put their money where their mouths are to make it happen.

The vision was that one day, an AI agent could do everything from book your travel to generate visuals for your business presentations. The ideal tool could even, say, find a good time and place to hang out with a bunch of your friends that works with all of your calendars, food preferences, and dietary restrictions — and then book the dinner reservation and create a calendar event for everyone.

Now let’s talk about the “AI coding” of it all: For years, AI coding has been carrying the agentic AI industry. If you asked anyone about real-life, successful, not-annoying use cases for AI agents happening right now and not conceptually in a not-too-distant future, they’d point to AI coding — and that was pretty much the only concrete thing they could point to. Many engineers use AI agents for coding, and they’re seen as objectively pretty good. Good enough, in fact, that at Microsoft and Google, up to 30 percent of the code is now being written by AI agents. And for startups like OpenAI and Anthropic, which burn through cash at high rates, one of their biggest revenue generators is AI coding tools for enterprise clients.

So until recently, AI coding has been the main real-life use case of AI agents, but obviously, that’s not pandering to the everyday consumer. The vision, remember, was always a jack-of-all-trades sort of AI agent for the “everyman.” And we’re not quite there yet — but in 2025, we’ve gotten closer than we’ve ever been before.

Last October, Anthropic kicked things off by introducing “Computer Use,” a tool that allowed Claude to use a computer like a human might — browsing, searching, accessing different platforms, and completing complex tasks on a user’s behalf. The general consensus was that the tool was a step forward for technology, but reviews said that in practice, it left a lot to be desired. Fast-forward to January 2025, and OpenAI released Operator, its version of the same thing, and billed it as a tool for filling out forms, ordering groceries, booking travel, and creating memes. Once again, in practice, many users agreed that the tool was buggy, slow, and not always efficient. But again, it was a significant step. The next month, OpenAI released Deep Research, an agentic AI tool that could compile long research reports on any topic for a user, and that spun things forward, too. Some people said the research reports were more impressive in length than content, but others were seriously impressed. And then in July, OpenAI combined Deep Research and Operator into one AI agent product: ChatGPT Agent. Was it better than most consumer-facing agentic AI tools that came before? Absolutely. Was it still tough to make work successfully in practice? Absolutely.

So there’s a long way to go to reach that vision of an ideal AI agent, but at the same time, we’re technically closer than we’ve ever been before. That’s why tech companies are putting more and more money into agentic AI, by way of investing in additional compute, research and development, or talent. Google recently hired Windsurf’s CEO, cofounder, and some R&D team members, specifically to help Google push its AI agent projects forward. And companies like Anthropic and OpenAI are racing each other up the ladder, rung by rung, to introduce incremental features to put these agents in the hands of consumers. (Anthropic, for instance, just announced a Chrome extension for Claude that allows it to work in your browser.)

So really, what happens next is that we’ll see AI coding continue to improve (and, unfortunately, potentially replace the jobs of many entry-level software engineers). We’ll also see the consumer-facing agent products improve, likely slowly but surely. And we’ll see agents used increasingly for enterprise and government applications, especially since Anthropic, OpenAI, and xAI have all debuted government-specific AI platforms in recent months.

Overall, expect to see more false starts, starts and stops, and mergers and acquisitions as the AI agent competition picks up (and the hype bubble continues to balloon). One question we’ll all have to ask ourselves as the months go on: What do we actually want a conceptual “AI agent” to be able to do for us? Do we want them to replace just the logistics or also the more personal, human aspects of life (i.e., helping write a wedding toast or a note for a flower delivery)? And how good are they at helping with the logistics vs. the personal stuff? (Answer for that last one: not very good at the moment.)

  • Besides the astronomical environmental cost of AI — especially for large models, which are the ones powering AI agent efforts — there’s an elephant in the room. And that’s the idea that “smarter AI that can do anything for you” isn’t always good, especially when people want to use it to do… bad things. Things like creating chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) weapons. Top AI companies say they’re increasingly worried about the risks of that. (Of course, they’re not worried enough to stop building.)
  • Let’s talk about the regulation of it all. A lot of people have fears about the implications of AI, but many aren’t fully aware of the potential dangers posed by uber-helpful, aiming-to-please AI agents in the hands of bad actors, both stateside and abroad (think: “vibe-hacking,” romance scams, and more). AI companies say they’re ahead of the risk with the voluntary safeguards they’ve implemented. But many others say this may be a case for an external gut-check.

23 CommentsFollow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

  • Hayden FieldClose

    Hayden Field

    Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All by Hayden Field

  • AIClose

    AI

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All AI

  • ColumnClose

    Column

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Column

  • TechClose

    Tech

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Tech

  • The StepbackClose

    The Stepback

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All The Stepback



Source link

September 1, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
AI Education
Gaming Gear

Your smartest employee might not be human

by admin September 1, 2025



For business leaders right now, two small words seem almost impossible to avoid: AI agents. Built on the ‘brain’ of an AI model, and armed with a specific purpose and access to tools, agents are autonomous decision-makers that are being increasingly integrated into live business processes.

Unlike normal AI tools, which rely on user prompts, agent-based – agentic – AI can execute tasks iteratively, making decisions that carry real business consequences, and real governance risk. In short, agents aren’t tools, they’re teammates. As well as sitting in an organization’s tech stack, they sit on its org chart.

Marc Benioff, cofounder, chairman and CEO of Salesforce, the $260 billion valued software giant, says that today’s CEOs will be the last to manage all-human workforces. (Asked if an agent could replace him some day, Benioff responded, half-joking, “I hope so.”) The sooner businesses recognize this shift, the faster they can move to securing and governing AI for accelerated innovation.


You may like

Donnchadh ‘DC’ Casey

Social Links Navigation

Just as human workers come under the umbrella of human resources (HR), it’s useful to think of agents as non-human resources (NHRs). Just like humans, there are costs to employing NHRs – including computing, architecture and security costs – and they need induction, training and appropriate limitations on what they can do, and how.

This is especially true as these NHRs move up the value chain to perform high-skill tasks that once belonged to mid-senior level talent. For example, autonomous agents are actively managing supplier negotiations, handling payment terms, and even adjusting prices based on commodity and market shifts – functions typically handled by teams of trained analysts.

Businesses can’t secure what they don’t understand

Introducing NHRs at the enterprise level is requiring an entire rethink of governance and security. That’s because existing cybersecurity focuses on managing human risk, internally and externally; it’s not built for the realities of always-on, self-directed agents that understand, think, and act at machine speed.

Like the best employees, the most effective agents will have access to enterprise data and applications, from staffing information and sensitive financial data to proprietary product secrets. That access opens the organization up the risk of attacks from outside, as well as misuse from within.

Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!

In 2024, the global average cost of a data breach was $4.9 million, a 10% jump on the previous year and the highest total ever – and that was before the introduction of agents. In the AI era, bad actors have new weapons at their disposal, from prompt injection attacks to data and model poisoning.

Internally, a misaligned agent can trigger a cascade of failures, from corrupted analytics to regulatory breaches. When failures stem from internally-sanctioned AI, there may be no obvious attacker, just a compliant agent acting on flawed assumptions. In the age of agents, when actions are driven by non-deterministic models, unintentional behavior is the breach – especially if safeguards are inadequate.

Imagine an agent is tasked with keeping a database up to date, and has access and permissions to insert or delete data. It could delete entries relating to Fast Company, for example, by accurately finding and removing the term ‘Fast Company’.

However, it could equally decide to delete all entries that contain the word ‘Fast’ or even entries starting with ‘F’. This crude action would achieve the same goal, but with a range of unintended consequences. With agents, the question of how they complete their task is at least as important as what that task is.

Onboarding agents like employees

As organizations introduce teams of agents – or even become predominantly staffed by agents – that collaborate to rapidly make decisions and take action with a high level of opaqueness, the risk is amplified significantly.

The key to effective agentic adoption is a methodical approach from the start. Simply rebadging existing machine learning or GenAI activity, such as chatbots, as ‘agentic’ – a practice known as ‘agent washing’ – is a recipe for disappointing return on investment

Equally, arbitrarily implementing agents without understanding where they are truly needed is the same as hiring an employee who is unsuited to the intended role: it wastes time, resources, and can create tension and confusion in the workforce. Rather, businesses must identify which use cases are suitable for agentic activity and build appropriate technology and business models.

The security of the AI model underlying the agent should be extensively red-teamed, using simulated attacks to expose weaknesses and design flaws. When the agent has access to tools and data, a key test is its ability to resist agentic attacks that learn what does and doesn’t work, and adapt accordingly.

From there, governance means more than mere supervision; it means encoding organizational values, risk thresholds, escalation paths, and ‘stop’ conditions into agents’ operational DNA. Think of it as digital onboarding. But instead of slide decks and HR training, these agents carry embedded culture codes that define how they act, what boundaries they respect, and when to ask for help.

As autonomous agents climb the (virtual) corporate ladder, the real risk isn’t adoption – it’s complacency. Businesses that treat AI agents as tools rather than dynamic, accountable team members will face escalating failures, eroding trust among customers.

Build cross-functional governance from day one

No smart business would let a fresh grad run a billion-dollar division on day one. Likewise, no AI agent should be allowed to enter mission-critical systems without undergoing structured training, testing, and probation. Enterprises need to map responsibilities, surface hidden dependencies, and clarify which decisions need a human in the loop.

For example, imagine a global operations unit staffed by human analysts, with AI agents autonomously monitoring five markets in real-time, and a machine supervisor optimizing output across all of them. Who manages whom – and who gets credit or blame?

And what of performance? Traditional metrics, such as hours logged or tasks completed, don’t capture the productivity of an agent running hundreds of simulations per hour, testing and iterating at scale and creating compounding value.

To help surface and answer these questions, many businesses are hiring Chief AI Officers and forming AI steering committees that have cross-department representation. Teams can collaboratively define guiding principles that not only align with each sector of the business but the company as a whole.

A well-configured agent should know when to act, when to pause, and when to ask for help. That kind of sophistication doesn’t happen by accident, it needs a proactive security and governance approach.

This isn’t just a technical evolution; it’s a test of leadership. The companies that design for transparency, adaptability, and AI-native governance will define the next era. NHRs aren’t coming, they’re already here. The only question is whether we’ll lead them or be led by them.

We list the best HR outsourcing service and the best PEO service.

This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro’s Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro



Source link

September 1, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Kioxia Exceria Plus G2
Gaming Gear

Kioxia Exceria Plus G2 (2TB) review: Convex and compact

by admin September 1, 2025



Why you can trust Tom’s Hardware


Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Japanese memory manufacturer Kioxia doesn’t have the same kind of name recognition as its former parent company, Toshiba, which invented flash memory in the 1980s. But the spun-off company, renamed in 2019 as a combination of the Japanese word for ‘memory and the Greek word for ‘value,’ has remained a major player in cutting-edge solid-state storage, alongside Samsung, Micron / Crucial, SK hynix, and WD / SanDisk.

Kioxia largely sticks to selling flash, SSDs, and related technology to other companies, at least here in the United States. But when a representative from Kioxia Europe reached out about testing a consumer-focused external SSD, the Exceria Plus G2, I was curious to see what the drive was capable of and how it would stack up against the best external SSDs we’ve tested, despite the fact that this pocket-friendly drive isn’t officially available in the U.S.

As a 10 Gbps (USB 3.2 Gen2) SSD, I knew it wasn’t going to break any speed records, but how does this drive stand up against competing compact metal-shelled offerings like the SK hynix Beetle X31 and the various X9s and X10s from Crucial? Read on to see our benchmark results. But first, here are the specs for the Exceria Plus G2, direct from Kioxia:

Kioxia Exceria Plus G2 (2TB) specifications

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Product

500 GB

1 TB

2 TB

Interface / Protocol

USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps)

USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps)

USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps)

Included

USB-C, USB-A cables

USB-C, USB-A cables

USB-C, USB-A cables

Sequential Read

Up to 1,050 MB/s

Up to 1,050 MB/s

Up to 1,050 MB/s

Sequential Write

Up to 1,000 MB/s

Up to 1,000 MB/s

Up to 1,000 MB/s

Dimensions

72 x 40 x 11.8 mm

72 x 40 x 11.8 mm

72 x 40 x 11.8 mm

Weight

42 grams

42 grams

42 grams

Warranty

3 years

3 years

3 years

Design and accessories

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

The black metal aluminum shell of the Kioxia Exceria Plus G2 feels very solid in my hand, and the convex top and bottom feel distinctive. This design may cause some complications, though, for those who like to use Velcro or other materials to stick their drives to the side of a camera, phone, or the lid of their laptop.

Kioxia thoughtfully includes both a USB-C-to-USB-A and a USB-C-to-USB-C cable along with the drive, both of which are about a foot long, including the plugs. A tiny activity light lives on the end of the drive, next to the USB-C port.

Pricing

You can find the Kioxia Exceria Plus G2 for sale in the U.S. via third-party sellers or on eBay, but generally not at competitive prices. At Amazon in the U.K., the 2TB model we tested was selling for £149 when I wrote this, with the 1TB version going for £93 and the 512GB capacity for £65. SK hynix’ competing Beetle X31 (another 10 Gbps drive with a metal shell), was selling for a little less: £137 for the 2TB model and £82 for the 1TB.

But both those drives are undercut in the U.K. by Crucial’s X9 Pro (which we tested alongside the X10 Pro), at just £108 in the 2TB capacity. The Crucial drive was on sale when I priced out these drives, but it seems clear that, at least in the U.K., Kioxia’s drive faces stiff competition when it comes to price.

Software

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

The drive itself arrives empty, but Kioxia does offer a downloadable SSD Utility on its website that lets you monitor drive health, update firmware if necessary, and password-protect the drive. It is a bit curious that the company doesn’t include an installer or at least a link on the drive itself, especially given that the Exceria Plus G2 features 256-bit AES hardware encryption. But the program is intuitively laid out and feature-packed, should you search it out and install it.

Comparison products

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

At 72 x 40 x 11.8 mm and 42 grams, the Exceria Plus G2 is smaller than many competing drives. The SK hynix Beetle X31 is thicker and heavier (74 X 46 X 14.8 mm, 53 grams), but Crucial’s X10, X10 Pro, and X9 drives remain among the smallest, at 65 x 50 x 10 mm and the same 42 grams as the Kioxia drive.

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Beyond minute measuring contests, though, most major external SSDs are similarly pocket-friendly and light these days, unless you count models like LaCie’s Rugged SSD Pro, which is a bulky 150 grams thanks to its rubber exterior and the internal cooling necessary for Thunderbolt 5-class speeds.

Storage testbed update

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Earlier in 2025, we updated our external storage testbed to an AMD Ryzen 7600X-based PC with an Asus ROG Crosshair X870E Hero motherboard, installed in Lian Li’s Lancool 217 case. This was done in part because we needed a system with native USB4 support for upcoming drives.

Get Tom’s Hardware’s best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

All the drives in the charts below have been re-tested on the new X870E system, with the exception of the final Iometer sustained sequential test, which is less about top speed and more about how long a drive can write before depleting any fast cache. We also updated to CrystalDiskMark 8, rather than the older (and non-comparable) version 7 we used on the previous testbed.

Trace Testing – PCMark 10 Storage Benchmark

PCMark 10 is a trace-based benchmark that uses a wide-ranging set of real-world traces from popular applications and everyday tasks to measure the performance of storage devices.

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

In this first test, the Kioxia drive didn’t exactly impress; It landed last among the drives we recently retested. That said, its score of 974 wasn’t far from most other 10 Gbps drives, which tend to top out around 1,150 points on this test.

Transfer Rates – DiskBench

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

In this real-world file transfer, the Kioxia Exceria G2 looked a little better, beating out the SK hynix Beetle X31 and Seagate’s flash-drive-like Ultra-Compact SSD.

Synthetic Testing CrystalDiskMark

CrystalDiskMark (CDM) is a free and easy-to-run storage benchmarking tool that SSD companies commonly use to assign product performance specifications. It gives us insight into how each device handles different file sizes. We run this test at its default settings.

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

In this best-case synthetic scenario on our overhauled testbed, the Kioxia drive managed to edge out three other drives, but landed slightly behind SK hynix and Crucial’s competitors.

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Small file performance is one area where the Kioxia drive shines. It lands behind the SK hynix Beetle X31 and Seagate Ultra-Compact SSD once again, but ahead of many other drives, including some with a faster 20 Gbps interface.

Sustained Write Performance

A drive’s rated write specifications are only a piece of the performance picture. Most external SSDs (just like their internal counterparts) implement a write cache, or a fast area of flash, programmed to perform like fast SLC, that absorbs incoming data.

Sustained write speeds often suffer tremendously when the workload saturates the cache and slips into the “native” TLC or QLC flash. We use Iometer to hammer the SSD with sequential writes for 15 minutes to measure the size of the write cache and performance after the cache is saturated.

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

The Kioxia Exceria Plus G2 again looks good on this most demanding of tests, managing to write for close to 12 minutes at above 1,000 MB/s (and slightly above its rated write speed), before dropping below 400 MB/s for the remainder of our test. If you need something that can handle lengthier sustained writes than that, you should probably opt for something like the Crucial X9 Pro, or better yet, something with a faster USB interface if your systems support it.

Bottom line

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

With a solid, small metal shell, hardware-based encryption, solid (if not class-leading) 10 Gbps performance, and USB-C and USB-A cables included in the box, Kioxia Exceria Plus G2 is a decent option for backing up or transporting your important data. Whether or not it stands out is largely down to its price in your region, as it’s not officially available in the U.S. But if it costs less than competing drives like the SK hynix Beetle X31 or Crucial’s X9 where you live, it’s easy to recommend.



Source link

September 1, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Meta Stock Drops On News It Used Taylor Swift As Chatbot Without Permission
Gaming Gear

Meta Stock Drops On News It Used Taylor Swift As Chatbot Without Permission

by admin September 1, 2025


Meta has ignited a firestorm after chatbots created by the company and its users impersonated Taylor Swift and other celebrities across Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp without their permission.

Shares of the company have already dropped more than 12% in after hours trading as news of the debacle spread.

Scarlett Johansson, Anne Hathaway, and Selena Gomez were also reportedly impersonated.

Many of these AI personas engaged in flirtatious or sexual conversations, prompting serious concern, Reuters reports.

While many of the celebrity bots were user-generated, Reuters uncovered that a Meta employee had personally crafted at least three.

Those include two featuring Taylor Swift. Before being removed, these bots amassed more than 10 million user interactions, Reuters found.

Unauthorized likeness, furious fanbase

Under the guise of “parodies,” the bots violated Meta’s policies, particularly its ban on impersonation and sexually suggestive imagery. Some adult-oriented bots even produced photorealistic pictures of celebrities in lingerie or a bathtub, and a chatbot representing a 16-year-old actor generated an inappropriate shirtless image.

Meta’s spokesman Andy Stone told Reuters that the company attributes the breach to enforcement failures and assured that the company plans to tighten its guidelines.

“Like others, we permit the generation of images containing public figures, but our policies are intended to prohibit nude, intimate or sexually suggestive imagery,” he said.

Legal risks and industry alarm

The unauthorized use of celebrity likenesses raises legal concerns, especially under state right-of-publicity laws. Stanford law professor Mark Lemley noted the bots likely crossed the line into impermissible territory, as they weren’t transformative enough to merit legal protection.

The issue is part of a broader ethical dilemma around AI-generated content. SAG-AFTRA voiced concern about the real-world safety implications, especially when users form emotional attachments to seemingly real digital personas.

Meta acts, but fallout continues

In response to the uproar, Meta removed a batch of these bots shortly before Reuters made its findings public.

Simultaneously, the company announced new safeguards aimed at protecting teenagers from inappropriate chatbot interactions. The company said that includes training its systems to avoid romance, self-harm, or suicide themes with minors, and temporarily limiting teens’ access to certain AI characters.

U.S. lawmakers followed suit. Senator Josh Hawley has launched an investigation, demanding internal documents and risk assessments regarding AI policies that allowed romantic conversations with children.

Tragedy in real-world consequences

One of the most chilling outcomes involved a 76-year-old man with cognitive decline who died after trying to meet “Big sis Billie,” a Meta AI chatbot modeled after Kendall Jenner.

Believing she was real, the man traveled to New York, fell fatally near a train station, and later died of his injuries. Internal guidelines that once permitted such bots to simulate romance—even with minors—heightened scrutiny over Meta’s approach.



Source link

September 1, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • …
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • …
  • 96

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (1,098)
  • Esports (800)
  • Game Reviews (772)
  • Game Updates (906)
  • GameFi Guides (1,058)
  • Gaming Gear (960)
  • NFT Gaming (1,079)
  • Product Reviews (960)

Recent Posts

  • This 5-Star Dell Laptop Bundle (64GB RAM, 2TB SSD) Sees 72% Cut, From Above MacBook Pricing to Practically a Steal
  • Blue Protocol: Star Resonance is finally out in the west and off to a strong start on Steam, but was the MMORPG worth the wait?
  • How to Unblock OpenAI’s Sora 2 If You’re Outside the US and Canada
  • Final Fantasy 7 Remake and Rebirth finally available as physical double pack on PS5
  • The 10 Most Valuable Cards

Recent Posts

  • This 5-Star Dell Laptop Bundle (64GB RAM, 2TB SSD) Sees 72% Cut, From Above MacBook Pricing to Practically a Steal

    October 10, 2025
  • Blue Protocol: Star Resonance is finally out in the west and off to a strong start on Steam, but was the MMORPG worth the wait?

    October 10, 2025
  • How to Unblock OpenAI’s Sora 2 If You’re Outside the US and Canada

    October 10, 2025
  • Final Fantasy 7 Remake and Rebirth finally available as physical double pack on PS5

    October 10, 2025
  • The 10 Most Valuable Cards

    October 10, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • This 5-Star Dell Laptop Bundle (64GB RAM, 2TB SSD) Sees 72% Cut, From Above MacBook Pricing to Practically a Steal

    October 10, 2025
  • Blue Protocol: Star Resonance is finally out in the west and off to a strong start on Steam, but was the MMORPG worth the wait?

    October 10, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close