Category:

Crypto Trends

Bitcoin advocate Ian Calderon runs for California governor
Crypto Trends

Bitcoin advocate Ian Calderon runs for California governor

by admin



On September 23, Ian Calderon joined the Gubernatorial Elections in California. He vowed to ensure that Bitcoin would be on the state’s balance sheet if he were elected. However, many in the Bitcoin community are skeptical.

Summary

  • Calderon has a multi-year track record of advocating for crypto and Bitcoin in the California legislature.
  • Calderon is trying to appeal to both Republicans and Democrats.
  • The announcement of his gubernatorial campaign sparked mixed reactions from the crypto community.

Who is Calderon?

Calderon, a Democrat, drew scrutiny last week with his pro-crypto stance. Critics say his Bitcoin narrative is a PR stunt. Yet, others found Calderon’s bid noteworthy, as it signifies the rising bipartisan support for Bitcoin.

Calderon served three terms in the California Legislature before quitting in 2020. He was the first millennial elected to the Legislature and the youngest majority leader in the history of the California State Assembly. 

Among his Bitcoin-related initiatives is one aimed at pulling crypto out of the gray zone. After all, Calderon is the author of the 2018 bill AB 2658, which created California’s Blockchain Working Group. It aimed to explore the potential use of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies, collaborate with policymakers to define the legal status of cryptocurrencies, and assess possible risks.

Between 2020 and 2022, he contributed to the Blockchain Working Group’s roadmap and began working on a bill aimed at making Bitcoin a legal tender in California. 

Calderon saw the bill as groundbreaking legislation for the entire country. He said in 2022:

“It’s important that we’re making this effort in California because of the national implications it will have. The goal here is to have a national model piece of legislation that can work anywhere in the country.”

It’s worth saying that despite Calderon’s claim about Bitcoin as legal tender, the bill doesn’t contain the words “Bitcoin” or “cryptocurrency.” Instead, it provides a pretty vague definition of “virtual currency” meant as a means of payment for goods and services. Calderon offered to launch pilot programs to tackle the bill’s legal ambiguity for the local cities. The bill has not seen much progress since November 2022.

Calderon’s platform

Calderon’s announcement was accompanied by a video clip in which he outlined the problems he plans to tackle as governor. He mentions growing gas and grocery prices and the housing crisis:

“Childcare costs are out of control, paychecks aren’t keeping up with the cost of living, gas prices are the highest in the nation, and now, buying a home is becoming out of reach.”

Additionally, Calderon notes that too many homes in California are owned by corporations and foreign investors, “preventing local families from attaining full ownership opportunities.”  

Calderon presents himself as a Democrat who believes in common-sense solutions and does not always agree with his party. The complete list of his initiatives is available on his campaign’s website, Ian For Governor.

He barely mentions Bitcoin in the video; however, on the day when he announced his governor bid, Calderon took to an X to state that it’s time to make California an undisputed leader on Bitcoin.

California has always been a leader on technology. It’s time for us to get back to our roots and make California the undisputed leader on Bitcoin.

— Ian Calderon (@IanCalderon) September 23, 2025

Reaction

A long-time ally, Dennis Porter, the Satoshi Act Fund CEO, has been teasing his 200,000-plus follower base with an important announcement for days.

When it turned out that he just wanted to inform his followers that Calderon is running for governor of California, many of his followers said the announcement wasn’t worth the hype.

Some of them equate Democrats with a war on crypto and don’t believe Calderon is a genuine Bitcoin supporter.

Most of them are unaware of Calderon’s track record as a Bitcoin advocate. Seemingly, the fact that the biggest crypto bills of 2025 were bipartisan doesn’t matter to them either.

Is this really “it”? Dennis…. I love what you do, but the hype was uncalled for.

— G$ (@Gendog52) September 23, 2025

Other critics recalled Calderon’s uncles, Ron and Tom, who were involved in California political life. In 2016, they were convicted on public corruption charges.

The adverse reactions stemming from Porter’s announcement spread on the comment sections of the announcements made by Calderon himself and several crypto influencers.

The latter includes The Wolf of All Streets podcast host Scott Melker and Wendy O, who is the host of the biggest female-run Bitcoin YouTube show, “The O Show.” Some expressed support for Calderon’s ambitions but urged him to stop his affiliation with Porter.

Dude… If you want to be serious drop working with @Dennis_Porter_ you might be a good guy but this guy hyped everyone up over a big announcement. It wasn’t a political announcement…

— ²¹²Johyo | CroCrash (@Johyo_cro) September 23, 2025

Nevertheless, many other people greeted an openly pro-Bitcoin candidate from the Democratic Party, hoping that Calderon could oppose fellow Democrats who go against Bitcoin.

This is the point of the announcement. Democratic pro-bitcoin voices can push back on the elizabeth warren camp in ways the GOP can’t. As bitcoiners isn’t this what we want?

— Gordon Perkins (@peconicgp) September 23, 2025

Competition

The fight for a governor’s seat in 2026 is already considered a tough contest. Calderon is facing several noteworthy candidates, including Congresswoman Katie Porter from the Democratic Party and Republican Fox News contributor Steve Hilton.

Given that the election will take place on Nov. 5, Calderon may approve himself at some point. Yet, it is hard to say if his participation in the race makes a difference. 





Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Exchange Review August
Crypto Trends

Peter Schiff Explains Why Strategy (MSTR) Should Have Bought Gold Instead of Bitcoin

by admin



Analysts mapped a slow-grind path for bitcoin and flagged $112,000 as the trigger while gold advocate Peter Schiff revived the gold-versus-bitcoin debate by challenging Michael Saylor’s BTC treasury bet for his firm.

CoinDesk Senior Analyst James van Straten said bitcoin’s market structure has shifted alongside gold’s repricing.

He expects a slow, stair-step advance supported by steady ETF inflows, with 10–20% pullbacks along the way. He compared the setup to gold in the early 2000s, when prices climbed for years but often paused for healthy corrections.

In his framing, bitcoin may sometimes lag gold and sometimes outperform it, yet he still sees bitcoin leading on total returns over a full cycle.

Read More: Bitcoin Trails Equities, Metals, and USD in Q3. Here Is a Key Level to Watch for Next Move

Michaël van de Poppe focused on near-term levels.

He called sub-$107,000 a buy zone, signaling where he thinks dip buyers are likely to step in. He also pointed to $112,000 as the ceiling to beat. A clean break and hold above $112,000 on UTC closes would, in his view, confirm strength and broaden risk appetite, the point at which flows often rotate into large altcoins. That is what he means by “altcoin mode.”

Euro Capital CEO Peter Schiff, meanwhile, challenged Michael Saylor’s strategy by contrasting Strategy’s bitcoin exposure with a hypothetical gold program.

His core claim is liquidity. He argued that tens of billions of dollars in gold could be sold with limited market impact, while trying to exit a similar bitcoin position could hit prices hard and set off copycat selling.

Supporters of bitcoin would counter that any large seller could stage exits over time and use over-the-counter channels, but Schiff’s point is that gold’s market depth offers more flexibility to very large holders.

CoinDesk Research analysis

  • Window: Sept. 27, 09:00 UTC to Sept. 28, 08:00 UTC.
  • What happened: According to CoinDesk Research’s technical analysis data model, bitcoin consolidated in about a $692 band (~1%), between $109,156.82 and $109,849.28.
  • Support showed up: repeated holds near ~$109,400 late on Sept. 27 (UTC).
  • Resistance formed: ~$109,750 capped rebounds in that same late-evening window.
  • Final 60 minutes: between 07:09 UTC and 08:08 UTC on Sept. 28, price popped to $109,663.84 at 08:03 UTC, then settled near ~$109,580, turning ~$109,575 into fresh, short-term support.
  • Read-through: Support ~$109,400–$109,575; resistance ~$109,750. A UTC close above ~$109,750 sets up $110,000–$111,000. Lose ~$109,400, and ~$109,150 is next.

Latest 24-hour and one-month chart read

  • 24-hour context (as of Sept. 28, 14:41 UTC): price near $109,724 sits above ~$109,400/109,575 support and below ~$109,750 resistance. A break and hold above ~$109,750 (UTC) points to $110,000–$111,000, with $112,000 the broader momentum trigger many traders watch. A slip back under ~$109,400 risks a retest of ~$109,150, then ~$108,500.
  • One-month context: after mid-September highs near ~$117,000, bitcoin has compressed into the $109,000–$112,000 area. Reclaiming and holding $112,000 would likely reignite upside momentum. Failing that, more sideways consolidation is the base case rather than a trend break on its own.

Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk’s full AI Policy.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Pavel Durov Declines To Censor Moldova Election Content on Telegram
Crypto Trends

Pavel Durov Declines To Censor Moldova Election Content on Telegram

by admin



Telegram co-founder Pavel Durov claimed that French intelligence services asked him to censor content related to the election in Moldova in 2024 in exchange for saying “good things” to the judge overseeing his trial, which he declined to do.

Durov said the messaging platform initially took down some posts that “clearly” violated Telegram’s terms of service, but declined to remove any additional content for political reasons. Durov wrote in a Sunday Telegram post:

“Shortly thereafter, the Telegram team received a second list of so-called ‘problematic’ Moldovan channels. Unlike the first, nearly all of these channels were legitimate and fully compliant with our rules. 

Their only commonality was that they voiced political positions disliked by the French and Moldovan governments. We refused to act on this request,” he continued.

Source: Pavel Durov

The crypto industry rallied behind Durov following his August 2024 arrest in France, and the related developments in his ongoing case, as the battle for free speech between tech platforms and state governments attempting to impose censorship polices unfolds. 

Related: Telegram founder Pavel Durov says case going nowhere, slams French gov

French and European authorities previously asked Telegram to censor political content

In May 2025, Durov pointed to a previous incident in which French intelligence services pressured Telegram into censoring Romanian election content, which he also declined to do.

“You can’t ‘defend democracy’ by destroying democracy. You can’t ‘fight election interference’ by interfering with elections. You either have freedom of speech and fair elections — or you don’t,” he wrote. 

Following his 2024 arrest, which drew widespread condemnation from the crypto community and human rights activists, he became highly critical of the French government and the direction of the European Union.

France is inching toward societal collapse due to state censorship and the failed policies of the current government, he warned in June.

He also stated that Telegram will exit jurisdictions, including France, before compromising user privacy by handing over encryption keys or building a backdoor into the messaging platform for state surveillance.

Durov’s repeated warnings about state-led attacks against online free speech and privacy came to a head in 2025, when an EU proposal to monitor all chat messages, including encrypted user communications, gained support from 19 member nations of the EU.

Magazine: Did Telegram’s Pavel Durov commit a crime? Crypto lawyers weigh in



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Bse Bars Jetking’s Vda Plan, Stalling India’s Crypto Push
Crypto Trends

BSE Bars Jetking’s VDA Plan, Stalling India’s Crypto Push

by admin



India’s cautious stance on cryptocurrencies has put a new kind of business model at risk. Jetking Infotrain, an IT training company that wanted to become the country’s first listed firm with a major crypto treasury, has been stopped by the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) from listing its shares after it raised money to invest in virtual digital assets (VDAs).

This decision shows that even as digital asset treasury companies, which hold Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies on their balance sheets, are gaining traction worldwide, India is still reluctant to let public funds move into this space.

BSE Blocks Jetking’s Listing Over Bitcoin Strategy

Jetking had secured in-principle approval from BSE on May 9, 2025, to issue shares through a preferential allotment. On May 23, its board cleared the allotment of over 3.96 lakh shares worth more than ₹6 crore. The company’s filings listed education and skill development, general corporate purposes, and acquisition of VDAs as objectives.

Nearly ₹3.96 crore, around 60% of the proceeds, was to be deployed into cryptocurrencies. Jetking already holds crypto in its treasury, and under current rules, Indian companies can invest in VDAs much like mutual funds or securities, as long as they disclose holdings to the Registrar of Companies.

However, BSE rejected the listing application, stating that “the policy on investment in virtual digital assets (VDAs) is under review and till a final view emerges, we would not be able to process the applications of this nature.”

Regulatory Grey Area Exposed

The decision underscores a deeper policy gap. While companies are allowed to buy crypto directly using profits or internal accruals, capital market authorities are uncomfortable with listed companies raising equity to invest in digital assets.

A BSE spokesperson explained, “We had processed the application in the normal course as per extant norms. Final approval was kept on hold to take up the issue of fundraising for investment in VDA at the policy level with the Regulator. Subsequently, as per the revised norms, a decision was taken to reject the application.”

Jetking’s joint MD and CFO, Siddharth Bharwani, said the company is reviewing legal options, including approaching the Securities Appellate Tribunal. He pointed out that “it has been five years since the Supreme Court said that cryptos were not illegal but require regulations.”

The situation also creates complications around reversing share allotments and refunding investors after funds have already been deployed.

Crypto Treasury Model Faces a Setback

BSE’s stance could derail plans by Indian entrepreneurs to launch crypto treasury companies modeled after global leaders like Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), XXI in the US, and Metaplanet in Japan. These companies hold large amounts of Bitcoin and other crypto assets on their balance sheets and are known as DATs.

Unlike exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which issue units backed by crypto, DATs can raise equity and debt and also stake their crypto — locking up tokens to help secure networks while earning newly minted rewards.

But India’s legal treatment of crypto as “intangible assets” rather than securities or currency complicates the picture. Without clearer classification, such entities fall outside traditional financial services rules and face additional hurdles under laws like FEMA.

“There’s an increasingly urgent need for clearer classification of virtual digital assets under various existing laws. An approach of express regulatory guidance would be preferred to policy uncertainty,” said Jaideep Reddy, partner at Trilegal.

Banks are also grappling with this uncertainty. Some wealthy Indians have invested in US crypto ETFs through the RBI’s Liberalised Remittance Scheme, but local banks remain divided on whether such investments are permissible since the underlying assets are crypto.

“Exchanges have wide discretion to deny listing where the use of funds looks speculative and policy is unsettled until there’s a formal regulatory framework on how listed companies can deploy capital into crypto or other VDAs,” said Moin Ladha, partner at Khaitan & Co.

Industry Pushback: “Stop Gatekeeping”

CoinDCX CEO Sumit Gupta reacted strongly to BSE’s move, pointing out that globally “over 145 companies from Metaplanet in Japan to Tesla in the U.S. have added Bitcoin or crypto on their balance sheets.”

He cited Strategy — “a roughly $90 billion enterprise” holding “over 620,000 BTC” — which “posted more than $14 billion in unrealized gains in Q2 2025 alone.”

Gupta highlighted Jetking’s efforts: the company spent months planning its crypto treasury strategy, secured in-principle approval, raised ₹6.1 crore, deployed ₹3.96 crore into Bitcoin, and planned further investments, only to see the plan overturned overnight.

He questioned the rationale for the decision, asking, “The Supreme Court has already affirmed that crypto trading and investing are legal and subject to taxation, so it will be interesting to know on what basis BSE wishes to bar a company from this activity?”

Gupta added that it was ironic to block a “profit-generating company aiming to adopt a proven global model” while allowing many loss-making startups with unsustainable business models to raise large sums.

Warning that such decisions could leave India behind, he wrote, “This is exactly how India ends up playing catch-up with every new technology wave. We hesitate, we restrict, and by the time others have figured it out, we’re left behind.”

With BSE’s rejection of Jetking’s listing, the future of crypto treasury companies in India looks uncertain. The case has once again highlighted the urgent need for clear regulations on how Indian companies can engage with digital assets, and whether the country is ready to embrace business models already flourishing abroad.

Also Read: India’s ED Charges Raj Kundra Over ₹150 Crore in Gain Bitcoin Scam



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
99.02% Shiba Inu Metric Drop Has Intriguing 9,008,428 SHIB Twist: Details
Crypto Trends

99.02% Shiba Inu Metric Drop Has Intriguing 9,008,428 SHIB Twist: Details

by admin


In the last 24 hours, Shiba Inu’s burn rate crashed into the negative. As reported, 7,082,219 SHIB were burned in the day preceding Sept. 27. From over 7 million SHIB tokens burned a day before, Shiba Inu burns fell not to a million but to less than 100,000 SHIB.

In the past day, Shiba Inu burn sentiment fell, leading to a drop in tokens burned. According to Shibburn, 69,690 SHIB were burned, leading to a 99.02% drop in daily burn rate. Meanwhile, in the past seven days, there has been an uptick in burn rate with over 9 million tokens burned.

HOURLY SHIB UPDATE$SHIB Price: $0.00001173 (1hr 0.07% ▲ | 24hr -1.37% ▼ )
Market Cap: $6,913,288,373 (-1.39% ▼)
Total Supply: 589,247,696,994,906

TOKENS BURNT
Past 24Hrs: 69,690 (-99.02% ▼)
Past 7 Days: 9,008,428 (365.01% ▲)

— Shibburn (@shibburn) September 28, 2025

In the last seven days, a total of 9,008,428 SHIB have been burned, according to Shibburn, resulting in a 365% surge in weekly burn rate. This suggests the peculiarity of the drop in the last day, as it might be a temporary lull in token burns.

Shiba Inu’s total supply is now 589,247,696,994,906 SHIB out of an initial 1 quadrillion tokens.

Shiba Inu Q4 rally?

At the time of writing, SHIB was down 0.32% in the last 24 hours to $0.00001176 and down 9.10% weekly.

Shiba Inu is down 3.53% so far in September, in line with a price tendency seen in the last two years.

Shiba Inu finished 2023 and 2024 higher, with gains of 23% and 104%, respectively, aided by positive Q4 performance in both instances. In 2023, while SHIB’s price was mostly flat for the larger part of the year, it saw a rise in Q4, increasing in the months spanning from October to December.

The same was witnessed in 2024, as the Shiba Inu price declined for months, only to stage a last-minute Q4 rally to close the year 104% higher. Shiba Inu rose from a low of $0.00001231 in September of that year to reach a high of $0.00003344 in December, a 171% surge. From both instances, a trend seen for Shiba Inu is that of last-minute Q4 rallies. Whether history will rhyme in the current Q4 will be closely watched in the months ahead.





Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
trash, money
Crypto Trends

Tether and Circle Are ‘Printing Money’ But Competition is Coming: Wormhole Co-Founder

by admin



Stablecoin giants like Tether and Circle are profiting from the current high-interest rate environment while stablecoin holders see none of the returns, said Wormhole’s co-founder, Dan Reecer, at Mercado Bitcoin’s DAC 2025 event.

Speaking as a panelist, he said the companies are effectively “printing money” by keeping the yield from the U.S. Treasuries backing their tokens. Tether, for example, reported $4.9 billion in net profit in the second quarter of the year. That has seen the company’s valuation soar to a reported $500 billion in a new funding round.

As interest rates remain elevated, Reecer suggested it’s only a matter of time before users expect a share of that yield or move their funds elsewhere.

Platforms like M^0 and Agora are already responding to that demand, he suggested. These projects allow stablecoin infrastructure to be built in a way that routes yield to applications or directly to end users, instead of the issuer capturing all of it.

“If I’m holding USDC, I’m losing money, losing money that Circle is making,” Reecer said in the session, referring to the opportunity cost of holding a non-yielding token that’s backed by U.S. Treasuries generating income.

Tether and Circle likely do not share the yield generated from their stablecoins directly with users as doing so could draw the ire of regulators. An alternative that’s steadily growing are money market funds, which allow investors to gain exposure to the yield behind these stablecoins.

Circle, it’s worth noting, acquired Hashnote earlier this year for $1.3 billion, the issuer of the tokenized money market fund USYC. With this acquisition, Circle aims to enable convertibility between cash and yield-bearing collateral on blockchains.

These money market funds, however, are still a fraction of the stablecoin market. According to RWA.xyz data, their market capitalization currently stands around $7.3 billion, while the global stablecoin market has topped $290 billion.

A Tether spokesperson told CoinDesk that “USDT’s role is clear: it is a digital dollar, not an investment product.” He added that “hundreds of millions of people” rely on USDT, especially in emerging markets, “where it serves as a lifeline against inflation, banking instability, and capital controls.”

“While few percentage points might make the difference for rich Americans or Europeans, the real savings for our USDT user base is the one against dramatic inflation so common in developing countries – often reaching numbers as high as 50% to 90% year-over-year, with declines of local currency values against the US dollar at 70% year-over-year,” he said.

“Passing along yield would fundamentally change a stablecoin’s nature, risk profile, and regulatory treatment,” the spokesperson added. “Competitors experimenting with yield-bearing stablecoins are targeting a completely different audience, and they take on additional risks.”

Fireblocks’ Stephen Richardson, during the panel, said the broader stablecoin market is meanwhile evolving toward real-world use cases, including cross-border payments and FX services.

He pointed out that tokenized money moving instantly could help solve problems that exist today, such as slow corporate payment rails or expensive remittances. Financial innovation, Richardson added, is already being seen in the sector, with an example being tokenized money market funds that are being used as collateral on exchanges.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Which Will Survive the Next 50 Years?
Crypto Trends

Which Will Survive the Next 50 Years?

by admin



Key takeaways

  • Stocks may survive AI disruption if they adapt quickly to changing technological and economic demands.

  • New businesses spurred by AI, such as robotics, biotech or space, are expected to drive growth, and the stocks mirroring such advances will have a better chance of surviving the innovation turmoil.

  • Periods of disruption should be expected as AI reshapes labor and markets; therefore, the next few years are for adaptation to the new technology.

  • Bitcoin’s future rests on proving itself as a true store of value but also transitioning into a medium of exchange. AI can facilitate this, mainly by impacting scalability and transaction processes.

  • As a decentralized system, Bitcoin is not affected by internal politics, whose human element could disrupt its operations. It only has to stay up-to-date with the new tech to remain relevant.

Nobody has the means to predict what will happen within the next 50 years, especially not in a financial market that is influenced by so many external factors.

However, analyzing the current status of AI and its impact on fintech sectors such as Bitcoin and stocks, it’s possible to understand what would be the best investment choice between these financial tools.

The purpose of this article is to help you make more informed decisions and understand if Bitcoin or stocks is a better choice for you in the future.

Stocks or Bitcoin: Which will survive the AI revolution?

AI will accelerate innovation and efficiency in several industries, sectors and aspects of our lives, surely advancing improvements in tech like Bitcoin in terms of efficiency and, hopefully, scaling. But how about stocks? Is their investment concept a thing of the past? Let’s find out a little bit more.

What is the case for stocks?

The world’s first stock market took shape in Amsterdam in 1602 with the founding of the Dutch East India Company. What began as a marketplace for trading company shares soon became a model for raising capital and investing. By the late 17th century, London had developed its own trading hubs, while New York’s exchange would not emerge until 1792, spreading the model across the Atlantic.

Stocks represent ownership in companies, and the stock market is where investors buy and sell them. Stock values fluctuate based on company performance and market conditions, including the ability to adapt to technological changes like AI.

Stocks of businesses that embraced technological advancements over the centuries have survived economic cycles, wars and disruptions that technology brought along. Without the benefit of hindsight, the same seems likely for companies betting on AI.

Specifically, companies that apply AI through automation, data analytics and new business models are likely to succeed.

Historically, market indexes like the S&P 500 have delivered approximately 7%-10% annualized returns over decades, adjusted for inflation. The index tracks the performance of 500 of the largest publicly traded US companies and is widely used as a benchmark for the overall stock market.

Compared to the S&P 500, Bitcoin’s (BTC) performance has been exceptionally higher, as shown in the table below:

What is the case for Bitcoin?

Bitcoin is a relatively new invention, created in 2009 by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto.

The project was introduced in a white paper detailing a peer-to-peer electronic cash system using blockchain technology.

The case for Bitcoin goes beyond the investment tool or store of value conception. Its proposal includes a true monetary revolution, which challenges gold and other financial tools.

Its decentralized design resists central control and the inflation common in fiat systems. With a fixed supply capped at 21 million coins, Bitcoin’s scarcity appeals to those seeking protection against monetary debasement.

Furthermore, blockchain’s transparency and security align well with AI’s need for verifiable data.

Over the years, Bitcoin has established itself as both a store of value and an alternative currency, while still pursuing its original goal of becoming a widely used medium of exchange.

How AI affects stocks and the stock market

The next 50 years could challenge the survival of the stock market as an institution due to “artificial intelligence speeding up innovation cycles, making public companies inefficient investment vehicles,” as predicted by analyst and investor Jordi Visser.

Stocks have been around a long time, but AI-driven disruptions leave little room for complacency, and companies that fail to adjust risk falling behind. This is especially true for tech giants like the FAANG stocks (Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google). While they are among the biggest investors in AI, these companies will still need to keep pace with rapid developments and adopt them effectively.

AI will also have an impact on the stock market, from quickly analyzing huge amounts of data to predicting market movements and automating decision-making processes, for faster and more efficient operations. AI will have an enormous impact on the way investors approach trading and investment strategies.

Overall, AI will likely boost corporate innovation but also widen the gap between adaptable and stagnant firms.

How AI affects Bitcoin

Visser sees Bitcoin as a better future investment and compares it to gold, which has endured for thousands of years.

Beyond its role as a store of value, Bitcoin is well-placed in the future of finance. The combination of AI and blockchain may disrupt traditional financial systems, bringing more capital and participants into the digital economy.

AI is expected to improve Bitcoin security and trading strategies, improving crypto trading through automated tools, enhanced data analysis and market pattern prediction. All these changes may also trigger better system efficiency.

Bitcoin mining will also benefit from AI in terms of efficiency and better resource allocation by predicting optimal times for mining activity to reduce costs and maximize output. System maintenance will improve as AI can detect existing or upcoming failures, thereby increasing its overall reliability.

However, Bitcoin faces regulatory risks, scalability issues and volatility, which may deter risk-averse investors who generally prefer more predictable and stable investment tools such as stocks.

The convergence of AI and blockchain could trigger a new era for Bitcoin, nurturing broader adoption by creating a more intuitive and secure ecosystem, giving it an edge over stagnant stocks.

Which will survive the next 50 years?

Looking 50 years ahead is practically impossible. Both Bitcoin and stocks have unique strengths and weaknesses, and their future ultimately depends on economic, technological and societal changes.

Stocks will likely endure if they adapt to AI-driven economies. Investors can mitigate risks of individual company failures by putting money into diversified portfolios, like index funds, which appear more secure. Stocks in robotics, biotech, space and AI may perform better than less tech-driven assets.

The advent of quantum computing is often discussed in relation to Bitcoin’s security model, though most experts agree the risk is still theoretical and distant. Combined with AI, its impact could be positive or negative depending on how the technology evolves and how the Bitcoin network adapts. Mining centralization might also be a concern if only a few entities gain early access to advanced quantum-AI systems.

On the other hand, the combination could be advancing Bitcoin security and network optimization by improving transaction processing, wallet security or blockchain analytics, enhancing Bitcoin’s efficiency and user experience. As long as the Bitcoin community stays ahead of the curve with quantum-resistant upgrades, the net impact could be positive.

As decentralized finance gains traction in investments, Bitcoin also enhances its competitive edge over gold. By doing so, it is emerging as a superior store of value and encouraging traditional markets to shift funds to digital finance.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Ethereum to $5,000? These Three Levels Might Be Key to Watch
Crypto Trends

Ethereum to $5,000? These Three Levels Might Be Key to Watch

by admin


Ethereum, the second largest cryptocurrency, has returned to $4,000 following a drop in the week just concluded amid a decline in risk sentiment.

At the time of writing, ETH was up 0.43% in the last 24 hours to $4,008, but down 10.07% weekly.

Ethereum fell for five straight days from Sept. 20 to reach a low of $3,825, its weakest level in nearly seven weeks, before paring the drop.

The major cryptocurrency rebounded to a high of $4,071 on Friday following the release of the PCE report, regarded as the Fed’s favored inflation gauge, but this traction was short-lived.

This is as Ethereum’s momentum paused, with price showing little to no change in the last 24 hours. ETH’s price remains tightly locked between $3,974 and $4,040, with the market awaiting its next move.

Three key levels crucial to watch

While traders watch out for where ETH trends next, whether to the upside or downside, crypto analyst Ali highlights three key levels to watch for the ETH price in the event of an upside move.

Ali stated in a tweet that the three resistance levels to watch for Ethereum (ETH) are $4,158, $4,307 and $4,505, with a breach of these key levels ultimately leading ETH to the $5,000 target.

In a recent tweet, Dr Martin Hiesboeck, Uphold’s head of research, stated that confidence in Ethereum is rising. Institutional investor BitMine recently increased its stake to 2.42 million ETH, now holding over 2% of the total supply. This accumulation matches major traditional finance moves: REX Shares is launching its REX-Osprey ETH staking ETF, and Morgan Stanley is adding support for ETH trading on E*Trade, offering millions of clients direct access. Further strengthening the market, ETHZilla raised another $350 million specifically to buy more ETH.

Ethereum’s scaling efforts are also hitting milestones, with the network achieving a new record of six blobs per block, signifying heavy utilization of the data-availability layer by Layer 2s and confirming the success of the Dencun upgrade.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
India
Crypto Trends

Indian Stock Exchange Rejects Crypto Treasury Company Listing

by admin


Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) in India has reportedly rejected the public listing of Jetking Infotrain, an IT training company, on the grounds of intended capital use for crypto investment. This decision comes amid a flurry of digital asset treasury companies worldwide.

Crypto Investments Not Suitable For Publicly Raised Capital: BSE

In a report by local Indian media, Economic Times, the BSE barred Jetking Infotrain from publicly listing its shares, citing the exchange’s investment policy around cryptocurrency. On May 9, 2025, Jetking received an in-principle approval from the BSE to raise funds via a share issue. 14 days later, the company’s board approved the issuance of 396,000+ shares, raising over ₹6 crore, i.e $720,000. 

In its application with the BSE, Jetking stated the new capital would be targeted towards general corporate uses, education and skill development, and investments in virtual digital assets (VDAs). However, a significant ₹3.96 crore ($475,000), i.e, 60% of the raised funds, was targeted at crypto investments. 

It is worth noting that Jeking currently has some digital assets on its balance sheets, as Indian companies are allowed to invest in cryptocurrencies similar to mutual funds, securities, etc. However, the BSE has strongly opted against raising public capital for this purpose, as indicated by its rejection of Jetking’s listing.

A statement from a BSE spokesperson read:

We had processed the application in the normal course as per extant norms. Final approval was kept on hold to take up the issue of fund raise for investment in VDA at the policy level with the Regulator. Subsequently, as per the revised norms, a decision was taken to reject the application.

The BSE is considered the oldest Asian exchange and the second largest in India by trading volume after the National Stock Exchange of India. Notably, the recent BSE’s decision in rejecting Jetking’s public listing is likely to threaten the rise of crypto treasury companies in India. 

By virtue of their operations, crypto treasury firms such as Strategy in the US, Next Technology Holding in China, leverage their status as publicly listed companies to access capital markets, raising funds through equity or debt offerings that are subsequently deployed into digital assets.

Jetking To Appeal BSE Rejection?

Following this development, Jetking Co-Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer Siddharth Bharwani has stated the company is considering all appropriate responses to the BSE’s decision, including a potential appeal at the Securities Appellate Tribunal. 

Notably, cryptocurrencies are not illegal investments in India but are considered intangible assets in that they are not securities or legal tender. 

Total crypto market cap valued at $3.72 trillion on the daily chart | Source: TOTAL chart on Tradingview.com

Featured image from Flickr, chart from Tradingview

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.



Source link

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Close