Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop
Author

admin

admin

What Happens to Crypto if Government Shutdown Lingers
NFT Gaming

What Happens to Crypto if Government Shutdown Lingers

by admin October 4, 2025



The U.S. government shut down this past Wednesday, furloughing any federal employees deemed non-essential and forcing the rest to work without pay (though they should receive backpay when the government is formally funded again). If the government reopens within the next few weeks, it shouldn’t have too much of an effect on D.C.’s crypto policymaking. The longer the shutdown stretches, however, the more delayed crypto efforts will be.

You’re reading State of Crypto, a CoinDesk newsletter looking at the intersection of cryptocurrency and government. Click here to sign up for future editions.

The narrative

The government shut down on Wednesday, and at least as of press time, Democrats and Republicans do not appear to be close to a deal to reopen it.

Why it matters

As discussed in last week’s newsletter, the immediate effects of the shutdown are pretty straightforward: Market structure legislation will likely be delayed, federal agencies’ rulemaking will probably be delayed, and new spot crypto exchange-traded funds will not launch as many hoped in the coming days.

If the shutdown is just a few days — or potentially as long as two weeks — these efforts should resume pretty seamlessly. If the shutdown goes beyond that, the picture becomes much muddier.

Breaking it down

The longest U.S. government shutdown in history took place between December 2018 and January 2019, during President Donald Trump’s first term. At the time, Democrats controlled the House of Representatives while Republicans controlled the Senate. This latest shutdown is only a few days old as of press time, and could last just a few days or may stretch on further.

Perhaps the most immediate and tangible effect of the government shutdown on crypto issues is on exchange-traded funds. The Securities and Exchange Commission was expected to allow ETFs tracking the prices of assets like Solana SOL$225.07 and LTC$118.36 to launch this past week. While there was some movement last week and Monday, the clock ran out before all of the final paperwork could be pushed through, and the issuers have not yet been able to launch.

The SEC was able to finalize a pair of no-action letters prior to the shutdown as well. Other agencies, like the IRS, were similarly able to publish interim guidance prior to the shutdown.

Ron Hammond, head of Policy and Advocacy at Wintermute, told CoinDesk that, “It can’t be understated how busy the crypto policy developments have been.”

With the shutdown, policymakers are in limbo around these types of regulatory actions, he said.

On the legislative front, one individual familiar with the dynamics in Washington, D.C. said that they do not expect the timeline for market structure legislation to change much should the shutdown end within the next two weeks or so. While lawmakers are looking to hold a possible markup — a hearing where lawmakers debate bills before potentially voting to advance them to the full Senate (or House) — by Oct. 20, 2025, this seems unlikely, regardless of when the shutdown ends, given they are still working on the text of the bill.

Another individual familiar with these dynamics said an additional complicating factor for lawmakers and their staffers is the fact that the regulatory agencies they might consult with are currently furloughed, so the lawmakers writing the market structure bill won’t be able to receive feedback or answers to any questions they might have for these federal regulators.

Hammond said that December “is still feasible” for moving legislation through Congress at the moment.

“The longer this shutdown drags on, the more partisan bitterness seeps into the necessary bipartisan discourse on important topics like crypto market structure,” Hammond said. “Still, this shutdown drama isn’t affecting our calculus on odds of market structure legislation chances of passing being more probable than not before the 2026 election ramps up.”

Hammond said he was watching to see if a markup in the Senate Banking and Agriculture Committees by Thanksgiving.

This week

  • There are no hearings or events being held by lawmakers this week around crypto.

If you’ve got thoughts or questions on what I should discuss next week or any other feedback you’d like to share, feel free to email me at nik@coindesk.com or find me on Bluesky @nikhileshde.bsky.social.

You can also join the group conversation on Telegram.

See ya’ll next week!



Source link

October 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
How Low Can The Price Go Next?
Crypto Trends

How Low Can The Price Go Next?

by admin October 4, 2025



Key takeaways:

XRP (XRP) has repeatedly broken above the $3 level since its November 2024 boom, but each attempt has ended in a fakeout followed by deeper corrections.

XRP/USD four-hour price chart. Source: TradingView

On Saturday, its price once again slipped below its $3 support, coinciding with its 200-4H exponential moving average (EMA; green wave).

Can the XRP price decline even further in the coming days? Let’s examine.

XRP chart fractal puts 15% correction in play

XRP is mirroring a bearish fractal that may trigger a 15% drop toward $2.60 in the coming days.

In September, the token’s price formed a rounded top, then slipped into a period of symmetrical triangle consolidation before breaking down sharply. That move sent XRP prices tumbling toward the $2.70 area.

XRP/USD four-hour price chart. Source: TradingView

A similar sequence is playing out again in October.

On the four-hour chart, XRP has formed another rounded top and is consolidating within a bearish flag. This structure often leads to another leg lower by as much as the maximum distance between its upper and lower trendlines.

The four-hour relative strength indicator (RSI) contributes to this risk, as it has been correcting from overbought levels above 70 and still has room to decline before the oversold threshold of 30.

Related: XRP price reclaims $3, opening the way for 40% gains in October

XRP may first test flag support at $2.93. A decisive close below it could confirm a breakdown, potentially opening the way to $2.60, a decline of nearly 15% from current prices.

That downside target aligns with XRP’s 200-day EMA (the blue wave in the chart below).

XRP/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

A bounce from 20- ($2.93) or 50-day ($2.52) EMAs may invalidate the bearish outlook, prompting a rebound toward $3 again.

$500 million long squeeze can fuel the XRP sell-off

XRP’s $3 level sits right in between two heavy liquidity pockets, according to data resource CoinGlass.

On the upside, there are thick clusters of long liquidation levels between $3.18 and $3.40.

For instance, at $3.18, the cumulative short leverage is approximately $33.81 million, suggesting the market could move upward to trigger stop orders if bulls regain control.

XRP/USDT liquidation heatmap (1-week). Source: CoinGlass/HyperLiquid

On the downside, however, the heatmap highlights even larger liquidation pools stacked between $2.89 and $2.73, of over $500 million.

XRP’s decisive close below $3 could trigger a cascade of long liquidations toward $2.89–$2.73. Holding above $3, however, leaves room for a stop-run to $3.20–$3.40.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.



Source link

October 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Google is blocking AI searches for Trump and dementia
Gaming Gear

Oregon’s National Guard lawsuit hinges on Trump’s Truth Social posts

by admin October 4, 2025


After getting off the phone with Oregon Governor Tina Kotek on Saturday, the president mused over something that had baffled him about the call. Kotek had been “very nice,” said Trump in an interview the next day. But she was trying hard to convince him not to send in the National Guard, and that just didn’t make any sense to him. “But I said, ‘Well wait a minute, am I watching things on television that are different from what’s happening?’”

Hours later, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a memorandum federalizing 200 members of Oregon’s National Guard to deploy to Portland, and the state of Oregon promptly filed suit to stop it from happening.

In a hearing on Friday, the state of Oregon and the city of Portland presented arguments as to why a federal judge should grant a temporary restraining order against Trump. Over the course of about an hour and a half, the court appearance became a strange collision of television and reality, internet posts and statutory provisions. The two sides veered over a wide swath of legal territory — the prongs of Section 12406, the Posse Comitatus Act, the Administrative Procedure Act, irreparable harm. But the formalized structure of the hearing and the stolid, wood-paneled surroundings could not disguise the sheer insanity at the heart of the case. The lawsuit boils down to two things: the “great level of deference” owed to the Executive Branch when federalizing the National Guard, and the obvious truth that the Executive Branch is, at the moment, completely out of its gourd and posting through it.

There are three prongs to 10 U.S.C. § 12406, which outlines the circumstances under which the president may call up the National Guard. The first is in case of an invasion by a foreign power. The second is in the case of a rebellion. The third is when “the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”

“The parties have largely focused on Prong 3,” said Judge Karin Immergut as the hearing commenced. “I don’t think anyone has argued that we’re in danger of rebellion against the authority of the United States, but the defendants can correct me on that.”

As it turned out, the defendants — or rather, the DOJ attorneys representing the president and Pete Hegseth — did want to argue that Portland was on the verge of a revolt, saying that the protests at the ICE facility in Southwest Portland were a “deliberate organized resistance to the force and arms” of the United States.

“That standard is so broad it would swallow a whole lot of conduct,” objected Oregon senior assistant attorney general Scott Kennedy. “Most protests oppose authority.”

But somehow, the DOJ’s assertion that Portland was in danger of falling into an armed rebellion, wasn’t the most surreal part of the hearing. Most of the hearing was devoted to whether or not the preconditions for Prong 3 (the inability to execute US law using “regular forces”) had been met — or rather, whether the president’s determination that it had been met was valid.

When Judge Immergut asked the DOJ what the primary source of authority for the president’s determination was, deputy assistant attorney general Eric Hamilton replied, without the slightest hint of shame, “The most important determination is reflected in posts that he made on Truth Social.”

The two posts he cited were on September 27th and October 1st. In the first post, the president purported to authorize “full force” to call up troops to “protect War ravaged Portland” from “domestic terrorists.” The second post is much longer, and although it features Trump’s signature erratic use of capital letters, its sentences have multiple clauses and correspond to actual legal provisions. It’s a Trump-flavored post that doesn’t feel quite Trump. This October 1st post gets into the nitty gritty, specifying that he “activated and called into service the National Guard” because law enforcement “have not been able to enforce the Laws in Oregon.” The state of Oregon argued that the October 1st post was inappropriate to consider, since Hegseth had issued his memo on September 28th — a perfectly reasonable objection that barely seemed worth making, under the circumstances.

Hamilton took it upon himself to flesh out the picture of the war zone that the president was posting about. ICE was under “vicious and cruel” attacks by protesters, he said. Rocks had been thrown at ICE agents, protesters had attempted to “blind” ICE drivers with flashlights, ICE vehicle locations had been posted on the internet, ICE agents had been doxxed, and most terrifyingly, the driveway of the ICE facility had been occasionally blockaded, preventing shift changes. He also cited protesters setting up a guillotine on site. (No ICE agents have been guillotined.)

It was remarkable how many of the “attacks” he described were really about internet posts — posts about the vehicle locations, posts about the identities of ICE agents, posts with “violent threats” that proved that Portland was out of control. Kennedy pointed out that “by the defendant’s own description of the National Guard,” none of these things were in the National Guard’s power to address.

On top of that, not all of these things had happened in September, or even August. Many dated back to June, some to July. “The president’s perception of what is happening in Portland is not what is happening on the ground,” said senior deputy city attorney Caroline Turco. She spent some time reading excerpts from various law enforcement declarations that had been filed with the suit, especially in the nights leading up to Trump’s Truth Social posts, when the Portland Police Bureau had been in contact with the Federal Protective Service, which had reported “no issues, no concerns.”

Kennedy called the president’s posts “vague, incendiary hyperbole that lacks a good faith assessment of the facts.”

“We ultimately have a perception versus reality problem,” said Turco. “The president thinks it’s World War II out here. The reality is it’s a beautiful city with a sophisticated police force that can handle the situation.”

“We ultimately have a perception versus reality problem”

The shadow of 2020 loomed over much of the hearing. The DOJ wanted to use the 2020 protests to bolster its claims of violence and rebellion, but given the nature of a temporary restraining order, the judge didn’t seem to want to spend that much time thinking about what had happened five years prior. But the lawyers for the state and the city were also thinking about 2020 — “federal involvement,” they said, would only serve to “inflame” the situation, leaving Oregon and Portland holding the bag as furious protesters lashed out at Trump.

And the spectators in the courtroom and the overflow room were thinking about 2020 as well, Portlanders dressed in suits and rain jackets and puffers, filling the space with that idle, friendly chatter that is endemic to the Pacific Northwest. “Were you here in 2020?” I overheard one attendee say to another in the gallery.

The judge promised to issue her ruling soon, either that day or the next. She acknowledged that she had only been assigned to the case the day prior — the previous judge, Michael Simon, had recused himself the day before, caving to the Justice Department’s demands. Simon is married to Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR), whose district includes part of Portland and some of its suburbs. The new judge, Karin Immergut, was appointed by Trump in 2019.

As I exited the courthouse into a cold, wet October day, the building looked both new and old to me. I had been there many times before in the summer of 2020 — but the courthouse had been boarded up and fenced around, overrun with graffiti and feds in camo. I could see the spot where I had been tossed down the steps by an overzealous fed in 2020; it was next to a large engraved piece of stone I had never seen before, because it had been covered up by fortifications. There was a quote by Thomas Jefferson carved into its glossy face, with the inscription reading: “The boisterous sea of liberty is never without a wave.”

It was a bit on the nose, but so was everything else.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

  • Sarah JeongClose

    Sarah Jeong

    Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All by Sarah Jeong

  • LawClose

    Law

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Law

  • PolicyClose

    Policy

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Policy

  • Social MediaClose

    Social Media

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Social Media

  • TechClose

    Tech

    Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.

    PlusFollow

    See All Tech



Source link

October 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Developers using Unity warned to patch games ASAP following the discovery of a serious security vulnerability
Game Updates

Developers using Unity warned to patch games ASAP following the discovery of a serious security vulnerability

by admin October 4, 2025


Developers who have created their games using Unity have been warned to patch them as soon as possible following the discovery of a security vulnerability in Unity versions 2017.1 and later.

In a statement, Unity said a “security vulnerability was identified that affects games and applications built on Unity versions 2017.1 and later for Android, Windows, Linux, and macOS operating systems”, but insisted “there is no evidence of any exploitation of the vulnerability, nor has there been any impact on users or customers.”

The “Best Deal in Gaming” Just Keeps Getting Worse.Watch on YouTube

“We have proactively provided fixes that address the vulnerability, and they are already available to all developers,” Unity continued. “The vulnerability was responsibly reported by the security researcher RyotaK, and we thank him for working with us.”

Unity just sent out an email telling everyone who released a game between 2017 and today that they need to recompile and republish their games due to a security vulnerability. Yikes. CVE-2025-59489 pic.twitter.com/uXgGFMsvFV

— George Deglin (@gdeglin) October 3, 2025

To see this content please enable targeting cookies.

Manage cookie settings

The company added that it has now released an update for each of the major and minor versions of the Unity Editor, starting with Unity 2019.1, and a binary patcher to patch already-built applications dating back to 2017.1. It also warned developers that “it is imperative that you review [its] guidance to ensure the continued safety of your users”.

As spotted by VGC, the news resulted in some developers temporarily pulling their games from sale as they work over the weekend to get the patch implemented as soon as possible, including Obsidian, which removed a number of games from digital stores while it worked on the updates.

“Unity is dedicated to the security and integrity of our platform, our customers, and the wider community,” Unity concluded. “Transparent communication is central to this commitment, and we will continue to provide updates as necessary.”





Source link

October 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Even More Pasta Just Got Recalled in That Deadly Listera Outbreak
Product Reviews

Even More Pasta Just Got Recalled in That Deadly Listera Outbreak

by admin October 4, 2025



Just when you thought it was safe to let your guard down, another food recall makes headlines.

At least 20 people have been sickened by a listeria outbreak in prepared pasta products across the U.S., with four people dying, according to the CDC. Warnings have been issued for pasta from Walmart, Trader Joe’s, and a host of other retailers across the country.

Yet another pasta has been added to the list of things to avoid. Scott & Jon’s Shrimp Scampi with Linguini Pasta Bowls (9.6-oz) have been recalled over listeria concerns. The FDA has not issued a list of retailers where the product was sold, but did provide the best-by dates to look for. They include dates in 2027, so be sure to check your freezer.

Best if used by dates:

  • March 12, 2027
  • March 13, 2027
  • March 17, 2027
  • March 21, 2027

No illnesses have been reported from consuming Scott & Jon’s Shrimp Scampi, but the product is being recalled because it contains pasta supplied by Nate’s Fine Food. Kroger stores also added recalled deli bowtie and penne pasta salads sold from Aug 29, 2025 to Oct. 2, 2025 to the list.

The CDC has identified illnesses tied to the listeria outbreak in 15 states, with the largest number of cases identified so far in Texas. The recall for some pasta from Nate’s Fine Food was first issued in June 2025 but has expanded ever since. And it’s not clear if more brands will be added to the list.

This new recall adds to the previously recalled pasta, which is listed below by retailer.

Trader Joe’s

Trader Joe’s Cajun Style Blackened Chicken Breast Fettuccine Alfredo

Best-by dates:

  • 9/20/2025
  • 9/24/2025
  • 9/27/2025
  • 9/28/2025
  • 10/01/2025
  • 10/03/2025
  • 10/05/2025
  • 10/08/2025
  • 10/10/2025

Walmart

  • Marketside Linguine with Beef Meatballs & Marinara Sauce 12-oz. – best if used by dates of SEP 22, 2025; SEP 24, 2025; SEP 25, 2025; SEP 29, 2025; SEP 30, 2025; and OCT 01, 2025.
  • Establishment number “EST. 50784” or “EST. 47718” appears on the label in the USDA mark of inspection.

Walmart and Kroger

  • Marketside Grilled Chicken Alfredo with Fettuccine 12.3 oz – best-by date of June 26, 2025, or prior
  • Marketside Grilled Chicken Alfredo with Fettuccine 32.8 oz – best-by date of June 27, 2025, or prior
  • Home Chef Chicken Fettuccine Alfredo 12.5 oz – best-by date of June 19, 2025, or prior
  • Establishment number “EST. P-50784,” “EST. P-47770,” or “EST. P-47718” appears on the label in the USDA mark of inspection.

Albertson’s and Albertson’s-owned stores

Albertson’s pasta salads supplied by Nate’s Fine Foods have also been recalled. The full list of grocery stores where the Albertson’s pasta products have been sold:

  • Albertsons
  • Albertsons Market
  • Amigos
  • Andronico’s Community Markets
  • Carrs-Safeway
  • Eagle
  • Pak ‘N Save
  • Pavilions
  • Market Street
  • Randalls
  • Safeway
  • Tom Thumb
  • Vons

Consumers with questions who may need to reach the company behind the recall can contact Nate’s Fine Foods at 916-677-7303 between noon and 7 p.m. ET (9 a.m.-4 p.m. local time on the West Coast), Monday through Friday.



Source link

October 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Russell Adler walks in front of an oil fire.
Game Reviews

Black Ops 6 On Game Pass Cost Microsoft $300 Million In Lost Sales

by admin October 4, 2025


Last year’s Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 was the first entry in the hit multiplayer military shooter to launch day-one on Game Pass in what reportedly turned out to be an expensive experiment for Microsoft. According to Bloomberg, making the game available for free to paid subscribers on console and PC cost the tech giant $300 million in lost sales of the 2024 best-seller. That data point adds some interesting context to Microsoft’s controversial decision to hike the price of Game Pass Ultimate by 50 percent this week.

A defining feature of Game Pass was the decision early on to release first-party games like Forza Horizon 5 and Halo Infinite on the service day-and-date. Bloomberg reports that this move was “controversial internally” due to the likelihood of cannibalizing sales of big games that take a lot of time and money to develop. The Verge reported last year that a similar debate arose around the decision of whether to put Call of Duty on Game Pass or not.

The former long-time head of Activision, Bobby Kotick, went on record during the 2023 FTC trial over Microsoft’s acquisition of the company saying that he didn’t think adding games like Call of Duty to subscription services made “commercial sense.” “I have a general aversion to the idea of multi-game subscription services,” he said at the time. “Maybe part of it is being in Los Angeles and having large, big media companies move their content to these subscription streaming services and the business results have suffered.”

But following the acquisition, Microsoft did exactly that. According to Circana’s U.S. market data, sales of 2024’s Black Ops 6 were 23 percent higher than Modern Warfare 3 sales over the same period, but 82 percent of those sales were on PlayStation compared to Xbox and PC. Subscription gaming services also saw a 16 percent jump year-over-year following the release of Black Ops 6.

If the move cost the company $300 million in lost sales, Microsoft would have needed around 15 million players to subscribe to Game Pass Ultimate for one month to make that up, or just 1.25 million over the course of an entire year. The numbers would be more dramatic for the even cheaper Game Pass PC tier where Call of Duty is also now available day-and-date. The price hikes this week change that math. Now, even if Black Ops 7 saw a similar drop in sales, Microsoft would need only 10 million new sign-ups for Ultimate in November to fill the gap, or just 834,000 over the length of a year.

This week’s Game Pass overhaul shows Microsoft is essentially continuing to back off its original day-one commitment. Game Pass Premium is the same price Game Pass Ultimate was a few years ago, but will only get first-party Xbox games a year after they’re out and it’s not guaranteed to get Call of Duty games at all. This might not be the last major change we see to the service in the near future, either. The company is reportedly testing a “free” ad-supported tier that will be exclusively cloud gaming and could keep raising prices on the higher tiers if it thinks a core audience will stick around.

Bloomberg reports that Microsoft CFO Amy Hood has “asked Xbox to find other ways to increase profit.” Instead of growing its share of the gaming market, the company now seems content to extract more from those already paying it.



Source link

October 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
XRP Ledger: Ripple Exec Reveals Institutional Playbook
NFT Gaming

XRP Ledger: Ripple Exec Reveals Institutional Playbook

by admin October 4, 2025


In the second episode of RippleX’s Onchain Economy series, RippleX Product Director Jazzi Cooper unveils the blueprint for institutional finance on-chain.

Cooper details three core features of XRP Ledger, including multipurpose tokens (MPTs), a permissioned DEX and a native lending protocol, regarded as the blueprint for institutional finance on-chain.

The future of DeFi isn’t just about decentralization; it’s about credit, compliance, and confidentiality at scale.

Episode 2 of the Onchain Economy series just dropped, and @jazzicoop details 3 core features of the XRPL:
↳ Multi-Purpose Tokens (MPTs)
↳ Permissioned DEX
↳… pic.twitter.com/Je84HOBAtP

— RippleX (@RippleXDev) October 3, 2025

According to the RippleX product director, XRP Ledger already has payment capabilities (obviously essential for cross border payments), but in a bid to replicate traditional finance or bring more use cases onto the blockchain, the need for credit origination remains clear, with XRPL’s approach a little bit different than typical DeFi ecosystems.

MPTs

Multipurpose tokens (MPTs) went live on the XRP Ledger mainnet this week. MPT is a new native token standard designed to make issuing real-world assets on-chain far simpler, safer and more aligned with how financial institutions operate.

MPTs are created with compliance controls built in so that issuers can enforce KYC/AML, freeze or claw back assets if required, add metadata like bond terms or reserve attestations and manage distribution securely with multi-sig and escrow.

Permissioned DEX and domains

According to Cooper, the permissioned DEX is a neat feature that builds on a couple of different capabilities of XRP Ledger. Permissioned DEX extends XRPL’s decentralized exchange into regulated contexts, enabling secondary markets for RWAs or FX with full AML/KYC controls.

Permissioned domains allow markets to gate participation based on credentials, creating user-controlled environments. According to Cooper, permission domains basically allow users to create a ring fence around a protocol on XRPL to add in various compliance features.

Lending protocol

Cooper spoke about a new lending protocol coming to XRP Ledger, which will allow for credit origination on-chain. The launch of XRPL’s native lending protocol is expected in XRPL version 3.0.0 release later this year.

This protocol, defined in the XLS-65/66 specifications, introduces pooled lending and underwritten credit directly at the ledger level.





Source link

October 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
15,660,000,000,000 SHIB in 24 Hours: Shiba Inu OI Underwater
Crypto Trends

15,660,000,000,000 SHIB in 24 Hours: Shiba Inu OI Underwater

by admin October 4, 2025


The sharp decline witnessed in the SHIB trading price has also extended to its derivatives market as data from CoinGlass shows a notable decrease in its open interest over the last 24 hours.

With the data showing that SHIB futures open interest has plunged by 2.19% in the last 24 hours, the declining momentum flashes signals of new selling pressure on the market.

15,660,000,000,000 SHIB committed as bulls relent

Following the decline in SHIB’s derivatives activity, the leading dog-themed meme coin has seen only 15,660,000,000,000 of its tokens committed to open interest in the last day. This is worth $198.48 million per SHIB’s trading price during the period.

After multiple days of high price rallies, it appears that uncertainty is gradually stepping into the crypto market, with sudden price reversals sparking fears and doubts among market participants.

As such, the negative market trend has seen the total amount of money invested in Shiba Inu derivatives over the last day decrease substantially, suggesting reduced optimism and interest among investors.

While investors are still resilient on their bullish sentiments for the “Uptober” rally, they have shown less worry about the sharp reversal in SHIB’s on-chain activities as they believe it is only a brief response to the broader market headwinds; this suggests that the asset will be back on the positive trail in the near term.

With the negative trend reflecting on SHIB’s trading price during the period, data from CoinMarketCap shows that Shiba Inu has recorded a modest decline of 0.09% in the last 24 hours, trading at $0.00001245 as of press time.

Nonetheless, the fall in Shiba Inu open interest has expanded across major trading platforms, with Gate.io seeing a higher decrease of 4.21% in the metric as it accounts for nearly half of the total SHIB futures market.

Coinbase, on the other hand, has seen its SHIB derivatives activity remain on the positive side. While it accounts for only 0.34% of the SHIB derivatives market, the SHIB open interest volume on the U.S crypto exchange has surged by 1.54% over the period.



Source link

October 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Philips 27E3U7903 5K business monitor review
Gaming Gear

Philips 27E3U7903 5K business monitor review

by admin October 4, 2025



Why you can trust TechRadar


We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

Pixel density is something Apple pays far more attention to than most PC builders. Problem is, achieving Apple’s signature “Retina” display experience with one of the brand’s own monitors is very pricey. But you can now get the very same 27-inch 5K form factor from the ​​Philips 27E3U7903 for not far off half the price.

Up front and centre, this monitor matches the Apple Studio Display’s 5K resolution and 218DPI pixel density. It’s similar to the Apple panel in other ways, too. There’s a comparable feature set with excellent connectivity including Thunderbolt 4, plus an integrated webcam and microphone array.

This Philips even apes Apple with its boxy, metallic chassis aesthetic, and flat-wide base and stand. What’s more it even outstrips the Apple display by some measures. Philips has used the latest IPS Black panel tech to offer 2,000:1 static contrast, notably higher than the 1,200:1 ratio of the Studio Display.

Add in VESA DisplayHDR 600 certification, broad colour support and other features aimed at creative pros and you have a super strong on-paper package. The one catch is that while the Philips 27E3U7903 is much cheaper than the Apple Studio Display, there are some very good 4K monitors available at a significant discount among our pick of the best monitors for MacBook Pro. You’re going to have to really want that 5K thing to justify this new Philips panel.

Philips 27E3U7903: Design and features

Image 1 of 4

(Image credit: Philips // Future)(Image credit: Philips // Future)(Image credit: Philips // Future)(Image credit: Philips // Future)

  • Apple-aping design…
  • …but not quite quality
  • Excellent connectivity

Specs

Panel size: 27-inch

Panel type: IPS Black

Resolution: 5,120 by 2,880

Brightness: 500 nits SDR, 600 nits HDR

Contrast: 2,000:1

Pixel response: 4ms GtG

Refresh rate: 70Hz

Colour coverage: 99% DCI-P3

HDR: VESA DisplayHDR 600

Vesa: 100mm x 100mm

Connectivity: HDMI 2.1 x1, 1x Thunderbolt 4 with 96W PD upstream, 1x Thunderbolt 4 downstream,1x USB-C upstream, 1x USB-C downstream, 2x USB-A, headphone out

It’s obvious from the get go that the Philips 27E3U7903 is aimed squarely at the Apple Studio Display. That extends well beyond the basic 27-inch 5K form factor. The boxy, metallic-looking chassis and flat, wide stand and base, and glass screen cover all scream “Studio Display.” Even the way the fixed power cable sticks out of the rear is awfully Appley.

Where Philips can’t quite match Apple is for perceived quality. The 27E3U7903 is mostly plastic where the Apple monitor uses actual metal. So, it doesn’t feel nearly as expensive.

The Philip’s particularly chunky bezel also separates it slightly from the marginally slimmer Studio Display. To be clear it doesn’t feel cheap, either. But to at least some extent, you can see where the extra money goes on the Apple alternative.

Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!

Connectivity is both another strong point and another overlap with Apple. Philips has given this monitor Thunderbolt 4 with 96W of power delivery, plus Thunderbolt out for display daisy chaining, another three USB-C ports, USB-A, HDMI and ethernet.

That’s all tied together with full KVM switch functionality, picture-in-picture support and the aforementioned display daisy chaining. So, if you have multiple PCs, Mac, laptops, whatever, this display has you covered.

Next up, there’s a webcam with AI-enhanced autoframing and a microphone array, which again is redolent of the Studio Display’s Center Stage camera, plus stereo speakers.

For creators, there are features like a wide range of preset colour spaces including Apple’s favoured Display P3 support, 99% coverage of the DCI P3 gamut, support for Calman Ready automatic calibration.

The Philips 27E3U7903 is also VESA DisplayHDR 600 certified. That level of HDR certification requires some level of local dimming. Philips doesn’t quote the number of zones. But as we’ll see this monitor almost certainly is limited to a very small number of edge-lit zones, as opposed to full-array local dimming.

Philips 27E3U7903: Performance

Image 1 of 4

(Image credit: Philips // Future)(Image credit: Philips // Future)(Image credit: Philips // Future)(Image credit: Philips // Future)

  • Crispy 5K visuals
  • Very punchy backlight
  • Limited HDR capability

For 5K neophites, the first question is whether the upgrade in terms of pixel density compared to a 4K 27-inch monitor is obvious. And the simple answer is no, it’s not an immediately apparent and dramatic improvement in subjective, experiential terms.

No question, fonts and text are that little bit crisper and clearer. But 4K on a 27-inch panel is pretty good in that regard too. So, the benefits of 4K are a touch more subtle than that. One benefit, for instance, is that the 3,008 x 1,692 virtual resolution option in MacOS works particularly well.

For some creative workflows, it’s also very handy to be able to display a full 3,840 by 2,160 pixel 4K video stream in a window with space to spare for toolbars and controls.

But these are relatively niche upsides. For most users, it’s questionable whether the price premium versus numerous cheaper 4K monitors is worth it purely for 5K, and I say that as someone who really appreciates high pixel density in computing displays.

With that in mind, the Philips 27E3U7903 needs to justify itself in broader terms. For starters, it’s certainly very punchy. The maximum brightness in SDR mode is well beyond what most users will ever want to dial up.

However, it’s good to have some brightness in hand, especially if you want to use this display in a setting with lots of ambient light. You’ll have no problem burning that off with the ​​Philips 27E3U7903.

That said, in that context you’ll also have to contend with a fair bit of reflectivity from the glassy screen cover. That’s a very Apple feature and something you either like or dislike. But it certainly adds to a sense of heightened contrast.

On that note, this is an IPS Black panel with getting on for double the static contrast performance compared to most IPS monitors. From that spec alone, you might expect a dramatic improvement in black levels. The reality is much more marginal. This monitor still has more light bleed than a VA monitor, let alone an OLED panel with perfect per-pixel lighting.

That’s relevant for HDR performance, a notable weak point for this display. It has VESA DisplayHDR 600 certification and basic local dimming. But while Philips doesn’t quote the number of zones, it’s very likely to be around 16 edge-lit zones.

You can toggle the level of local dimming in the OSD. But in all honesty, this type of local dimming is barely any different from a dynamic backlight. Ultimately, this is not a true HDR monitor, even if it is pretty bright.

As for broader accuracy and factory calibration, that’s a slight weak point. It’s most noticeable when using an Apple laptop where the sRGB preset is actually a better visual match for Apple laptop than the Apple-default Display P3 colour space. To be clear, this is not a poorly calibrated display. But given the lofty price tag, it could be a touch better.

Finally, the integrated webcam is superior to a typical laptop camera, but not truly comparable to the Center Stage camera in the Apple Studio Display.

Philips 27E3U7903: Final verdict

Image 1 of 4

(Image credit: Philips // Future)(Image credit: Philips // Future)(Image credit: Philips // Future)(Image credit: Philips // Future)

If you’re a tech enthusiast, the very notion of 5K computing is pretty exciting. 5K has to be better than 4K, right? Yes it is, but the difference on a 27-inch display isn’t hugely dramatic.

There are advantages, such as slightly crisper fonts and the ability to view 4K content with screen real estate to spare for toolbars and other interface elements. But the benefits are relatively marginal. And I say that as something of a high-DPI aficionado.

With all that in mind, the ​​Philips 27E3U7903 needs to be absolutely excellent in broad terms to justify its premium pricing and not just by virtue of delivering that Apple Studio Display-style 5K experience.

Well, it certainly is excellent in terms of connectivity thanks to a plethora of ports, plus KVM switch and daisy chaining support. Elsewhere, the ​​Philips 27E3U7903 is certainly good, but arguably not exceptional.

The IPS Black panel is certainly nice, with vibrant colours and a very powerful backlight. But the subjective experience doesn’t quite deliver on the expectations raised by the on-paper 2,000:1 contrast spec. Likewise, as with most, perhaps even all, HDR 600 monitors, the HDR experience is limited.

Slightly harder to forgive is the factory calibration. This is not a poorly calibrated display. But it’s not as excellent as you might expect at this price point, albeit for the most demanding workflows, you’ll be calibrating this monitor yourself, something for which it provides good support.

All of which means the ​​Philips 27E3U7903 is ultimately a niche offering. If you’re tempted by Apple’s Studio Display but don’t fancy the price, this is a very appealing and effective alternative. If you want the absolute best possible pixel density, then likewise. But for most users, there’s better value to be had from a wide range of 27-inch 4K displays.

Image 1 of 5

(Image credit: Philips // Future)(Image credit: Philips // Future)(Image credit: Philips // Future)(Image credit: Philips // Future)(Image credit: Philips // Future)

For more high-resolution displays, we’ve reviewed the best 5K and 8K monitors.

Philips 27E3U7903: Price Comparison



Source link

October 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Crypto Exchanges Almost Out of Bitcoin: VanEck's Matthew Sigel
GameFi Guides

Crypto Exchanges Almost Out of Bitcoin: VanEck’s Matthew Sigel

by admin October 4, 2025


Bitcoin is on a bullish comeback move as the coin has gained 11.61% in the last seven days, as it inches closer to its all-time high (ATH) of $124,457. Amid this positive move, Matthew Sigel, VanEck’s head of Digital Asset Research, has dropped another bullish update.

Bitcoin self-custody moves tighten liquidity

According to Sigel, crypto exchanges appear to be experiencing declining reserves. In his post on X, Sigel stated that if the trend continues, at the start of business on Oct. 6, there might be a shortage of Bitcoin across the various exchanges.

He opined that it might be good thinking to acquire some Bitcoin before a shortage hits. However, a user immediately countered VanEck’s executive by noting that such a scarcity narrative has been making the rounds in the past four years.

Sigel’s reply is instructive as he insists that a scarcity was in play. “Well, I only got the calls from the exchanges today. I told them we aren’t selling,” he wrote.

Well I only got the calls from the exchanges today. I told them we aren’t selling 🤷‍♂️

— matthew sigel, recovering CFA (@matthew_sigel) October 4, 2025

This comment suggests that large holders and institutions like VanEck are being contacted to supply exchanges with Bitcoin. If this is true, it implies that there could be a supply shock with demand staying higher than supply.

It indicates that many Bitcoin holders have moved their coins off exchanges into self-custody, typically reducing liquidity. Such a scenario is a perfect condition to further drive Bitcoin prices higher.

As of this writing, Bitcoin is changing hands at $122,179.35, which represents a 1.52% increase in the last 24 hours. The flagship coin, which earlier hit an intraday peak of $123,944.70, is currently just 1.89% away from flipping its ATH.

The price surge has kept trading volume up by 1.12% at $73.51 billion within the same time frame. The uptick in activity suggests that the “Uptober” momentum is gaining ground.

Institutional bets signal new Bitcoin price peak

Worth mentioning is that the Bitcoin market looks ready to push the coin to a new ATH as investors have committed $45.3 billion in open interest on the asset. This extreme leverage move indicates that market participants are anticipating further highs from the leading cryptocurrency.

Meanwhile, Geoff Kendrick, Standard Chartered analyst, believes the coin has potential to hit $200,000 by the end of 2025. Kendrick drew a positive correlation between Bitcoin and U.S. Treasury term premiums, which are on the rise as a result of the government shutdown.





Source link

October 4, 2025 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
  • 1
  • …
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • …
  • 762

Categories

  • Crypto Trends (1,098)
  • Esports (800)
  • Game Reviews (757)
  • Game Updates (906)
  • GameFi Guides (1,058)
  • Gaming Gear (960)
  • NFT Gaming (1,079)
  • Product Reviews (960)

Recent Posts

  • Battlefield 6 Review – Battle Ready
  • Battlefield 6 review – the best entry in ages, when it’s actually being Battlefield
  • ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop (NVIDIA RTX 4050) Still at an All-Time Low With Hundreds Off, but Returning to Full Price Soon
  • Absolum Review – A Sleeper Hit
  • Little Nightmares 3 review | Rock Paper Shotgun

Recent Posts

  • Battlefield 6 Review – Battle Ready

    October 9, 2025
  • Battlefield 6 review – the best entry in ages, when it’s actually being Battlefield

    October 9, 2025
  • ASUS TUF Gaming Laptop (NVIDIA RTX 4050) Still at an All-Time Low With Hundreds Off, but Returning to Full Price Soon

    October 9, 2025
  • Absolum Review – A Sleeper Hit

    October 9, 2025
  • Little Nightmares 3 review | Rock Paper Shotgun

    October 9, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

About me

Welcome to Laughinghyena.io, your ultimate destination for the latest in blockchain gaming and gaming products. We’re passionate about the future of gaming, where decentralized technology empowers players to own, trade, and thrive in virtual worlds.

Recent Posts

  • Battlefield 6 Review – Battle Ready

    October 9, 2025
  • Battlefield 6 review – the best entry in ages, when it’s actually being Battlefield

    October 9, 2025

Newsletter

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

@2025 laughinghyena- All Right Reserved. Designed and Developed by Pro


Back To Top
Laughing Hyena
  • Home
  • Hyena Games
  • Esports
  • NFT Gaming
  • Crypto Trends
  • Game Reviews
  • Game Updates
  • GameFi Guides
  • Shop

Shopping Cart

Close

No products in the cart.

Close